Jennifer Garner Patrimoine net 2026
Dernière mise à jour August 3, 2026
As of 2026, Jennifer Garner has an estimated net worth of $135.9 Million, computed film by film and year by year from public records and published rates. Every input, rate, and source behind the number is on this page.
Calculation
- Salaires divulgués et backend documenté, chacun avec une citation
- Rôles non divulgués modélisés à partir de comparables divulgués pour leur époque, leur tranche budgétaire et leur étape de carrière
- Backend, avenants et crédits de production estimés à partir des médianes divulguées
Fast Facts
| Birthdate | April 17, 1972 |
|---|---|
| Birthplace | Houston |
| Breakthrough | Alias (2001) |
| Best Known | 13 Going on 30 (2004) |
Who Is Jennifer Garner?
Jennifer Garner was born April 17, 1972 in Houston, best known for 13 Going on 30 (2004). The earnings behind Jennifer's net worth come from film salaries, backend participation, producing and directing fees, endorsement deals, and the Once Upon a Farm stake.
The model tracks Jennifer's earning years from 1996 to 2026, with the biggest single year in 2007 at about $17.9 Million of gross income. After representation fees, taxes, and living costs, what stays invested compounds at market returns into an estimated $135.9 Million today.
Data
Chaque ligne ci-dessous est calculée à partir des données publiques et des tableaux de tarifs publiés sur notre page méthodologie. Confiance: Catégorie C. Les chiffres documentés ne couvrent qu’une petite partie de ce chiffre, de sorte que la majeure partie est modélisée à partir de taux publiés et de comparables (les notes vont de A, principalement documentées, à C, principalement modélisées).
The Calculation
| Line | Amount |
|---|---|
| Revenue | |
| Film pay, modeled lead roles (21 of 35 films) era and budget-band medians of disclosed lead salaries (winsorized, thin cells shrunk toward the era median), blended with this actor's disclosed quote history when available; soft breakthrough blend near the career break year | $79,249,653 |
| Film pay, modeled post-breakthrough supporting roles (7 of 35 films) 12.0% of lead cells: lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio | $10,302,326 |
| Film pay, modeled supporting and early roles (7 of 35 films) 2,5% des médianes de l'époque : le taux de pré-célébrité | $7,438,700 |
| Points back-end, estimés 12% of disclosed lead deals included points, at a median 2.6% of box office; expected value on 14 commercially viable undisclosed lead roles; cash spread over 3 years; documented-but-unquantified points use the median rate directly; 1 film(s) used band-specific box-office/budget multiples as a gross proxy | $8,955,294 |
| Approbations, estimées (2 partenariats de marque) 2 named partnerships x the $4.0M annual fee from the median disclosed film deal x a 4-year term, spread across the deal years | $32,000,000 |
| Producer, director, and writer credits, estimated (3 credits) union-scale floor per credit, scaled to each era; post-breakthrough lead packages use a multiple of that floor; actual packages often run higher | $3,216,096 |
| Résidus, estimés SAG residual rates on post-theatrical receipts assumed at half of box office, split by role share and spread over the ten years after each release; 3 film(s) used band-specific box-office proxies | $9,931,822 |
| Alias salary (2001-2005) Variety covered her mid-run raise; the series is booked from a reported $45K per episode early to $150K by the final season, interpolated between the documented endpoints (variété.com) | $10,800,000 |
| Retour sur investissement de l'épargne mixed portfolio: 55% actual 60/40 securities returns (taxed) + 45% US long-run home-price rate on the rest | $43,567,455 |
| Brentwood Park home appreciation, estimated documented $7,900,000 purchase in 2019, 6.0%/yr US-CA appreciation, net 7% selling costs; the purchase itself is already counted in savings | $3,147,172 |
| First Brentwood marital home appreciation, estimated documented $5,500,000 purchase in 2004, sold 2025 for a documented $10,800,000, actual sale price, net 7% selling costs; the purchase itself is already counted in savings (hellomagazine.com) | $4,544,000 |
| Once Upon a Farm stake equity, estimated co-founded 2017 with a documented 7% stake; the February 2026 IPO priced the company at $724M and Forbes valued her stake at $64M on the first trading day; $724,000,000 x 7% stake (forbes.com) | $50,680,000 |
| Expenses | |
| Frais de représentation agent 10% + avocat 5% | -$24,118,160 |
| Taxes Taux effectifs US-CA, année par année | -$60,309,267 |
| Dépenses personnelles measured household savings rates by income, times a 88% entertainment-household factor | -$42,439,741 |
| Valeur nette estimée | $135,859,189 |
Film par film
| Film | Year | Role | Budget | Billetterie | Salaire compté |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Family Switch no disclosed fee: modeled on the $23.8M shrunk median for 2020s/large (n=2), capped at $10.5M | 2023 | Plomb + P | $70,000,000 | – | $10,499,969 |
| The Adam Project no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $16.4M shrunk median for 2020s/tentpole (n=5) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio) | 2022 | Supporting | $116,000,000 | – | $1,971,419 |
| Yes Day no disclosed fee: modeled on the $25.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid), capped at $0.9M | 2021 | Plomb + P | $6,000,000 | $2,000,000 | $899,997 |
| Wonder Park no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $20.0M shrunk median for 2010s/tentpole (n=12) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio) | 2019 | Supporting | $100,000,000 | $119,600,000 | $2,399,914 |
| Love, Simon no disclosed fee: modeled on the $5.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid), capped at $2.5M | 2018 | Lead | $17,000,000 | $66,300,000 | $2,549,786 |
| Peppermint no disclosed fee: modeled on the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3), capped at $3.8M | 2018 | Lead | $25,000,000 | $53,900,000 | $3,749,693 |
| A Happening of Monumental Proportions no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $5.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio) | 2017 | Supporting | $6,000,000 | $850,000 | $599,918 |
| The Tribes of Palos Verdes no disclosed fee: modeled on the $5.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid), capped at $0.8M | 2017 | Lead | $5,000,000 | $11,603 | $749,892 |
| Miracles from Heaven no disclosed fee: modeled on the $5.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid), capped at $2.1M | 2016 | Lead | $14,000,000 | $74,000,000 | $2,099,338 |
| Mother's Day no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio) | 2016 | Supporting | $25,000,000 | $48,800,000 | $1,319,650 |
| Nine Lives no disclosed fee: modeled on the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3), capped at $4.5M | 2016 | Lead | $30,000,000 | $57,800,000 | $4,498,583 |
| Wakefield no disclosed fee: modeled on the $5.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid), capped at $0.6M | 2016 | Lead | $4,000,000 | $874,187 | $599,841 |
| Danny Collins no disclosed fee: modeled on the $5.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid), capped at $1.5M | 2015 | Lead | $10,000,000 | $10,800,000 | $1,499,102 |
| Alexander and the Terrible, Horrible, No Good, Very Bad Day no disclosed fee: modeled on the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3), capped at $4.2M | 2014 | Lead | $28,000,000 | $100,600,000 | $4,195,011 |
| Draft Day no disclosed fee: modeled on the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3), capped at $3.8M | 2014 | Lead | $25,000,000 | $29,500,000 | $3,745,583 |
| Men, Women & Children no disclosed fee: modeled on the $5.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid), capped at $2.4M | 2014 | Lead | $16,000,000 | $2,200,000 | $2,397,108 |
| Dallas Buyers Club no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $5.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio) | 2013 | Supporting | $5,000,000 | $55,700,000 | $598,826 |
| The Odd Life of Timothy Green no disclosed fee: modeled on the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3), capped at $3.8M | 2012 | Lead | $25,000,000 | $56,000,000 | $3,733,303 |
| Arthur no disclosed fee: modeled on the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3), capped at $6.0M | 2011 | Lead | $40,000,000 | $48,100,000 | $5,946,666 |
| Butter no disclosed fee: modeled on the $5.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid), capped at $1.6M | 2011 | Plomb + P | $10,800,000 | $175,706 | $1,606,073 |
| Valentine's Day no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $20.0M shrunk median for 2010s/large (n=8) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio) | 2010 | Supporting | $52,000,000 | $216,500,000 | $2,365,826 |
| Ghosts of Girlfriends Past no disclosed fee: modeled on the $19.4M shrunk median for 2000s/mid (n=2), capped at $5.6M | 2009 | Lead | $37,500,000 | $102,400,000 | $5,447,930 |
| The Invention of Lying no disclosed fee: modeled on the $18.8M median for its era and nearest band (mid), capped at $2.8M | 2009 | Lead | $18,500,000 | $32,700,000 | $2,695,561 |
| Juno no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $18.8M median for its era and nearest band (mid) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio), capped at 15% of budget | 2007 | Supporting | $7,500,000 | $231,400,000 | $1,046,773 |
| The Kingdom no disclosed fee: modeled on the $20.0M shrunk median for 2000s/large (n=18), capped at $10.9M | 2007 | Lead | $72,500,000 | $87,000,000 | $9,638,270 |
| Catch and Release soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.79): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $19.4M shrunk median for 2000s/mid (n=2), capped at $3.8M vs early terms | 2006 | Lead | $25,000,000 | $16,000,000 | $3,068,763 |
| Elektra soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.66): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $20.0M shrunk median for 2000s/large (n=18), capped at $9.8M vs early terms | 2005 | Lead | $65,000,000 | $57,000,000 | $6,611,996 |
| 13 Going on 30 soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.50): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $19.4M shrunk median for 2000s/mid (n=2), capped at $5.5M vs early terms | 2004 | Lead | $37,000,000 | $96,500,000 | $3,017,188 |
| Daredevil soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.34): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $20.0M shrunk median for 2000s/large (n=18), capped at $11.7M vs early terms | 2003 | Lead | $78,000,000 | $179,200,000 | $4,299,529 |
| Pearl Harbor no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $11.8M shrunk median for 2000s/tentpole (n=9) (pre-stardom rate) | 2001 | Supporting | $140,000,000 | $449,200,000 | $429,287 |
| Stealing Time no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $19.4M shrunk median for 2000s/mid (n=2) (pre-stardom rate); soft-breakthrough weight 0.12 | 2001 | Lead | $40,000,000 | – | $1,141,854 |
| Dude, Where's My Car? no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $18.8M median for its era and nearest band (mid) (pre-stardom rate) | 2000 | Supporting | $13,000,000 | $73,200,000 | $564,986 |
| Deconstructing Harry no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $14.4M shrunk median for 1990s/mid (n=6) (pre-stardom rate) | 1997 | Supporting | $20,000,000 | $10,600,000 | $372,097 |
| Mr. Magoo no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $14.4M shrunk median for 1990s/mid (n=6) (pre-stardom rate) | 1997 | Supporting | $30,000,000 | $28,900,000 | $372,097 |
| Washington Square no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $10.0M shrunk median for 1990s/small (n=1) (pre-stardom rate) | 1997 | Supporting | $15,000,000 | $1,900,000 | $258,850 |
Comment fonctionnent les figures modélisées. An undisclosed lead role after the breakthrough gets the median of disclosed lead salaries for its era and budget band, capped at 15% of the film’s budget. Supporting and pre-breakthrough roles get 2.5% of that median, the documented going rate for actors before stardom. Films with no reported budget are treated as small productions. Undocumented backend, endorsements, and producer or director credits enter as separate estimated lines in the calculation above, built from disclosed medians. Every median comes from the published tables on our page méthodologie.
Patrimoine net Over Time
Solde modélisé à la fin de chaque année, correspondant au tableau année par année ci-dessous.
Année par année
| Year | Income | Frais de représentation | Taux d'imposition | Spent | Saved | Balance |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | $311,972 | $46,796 | 45% | $131,729 | $14,118 | $135,859,189 |
| 2025 | $470,405 | $70,561 | 45% | $173,468 | $46,446 | $75,936,192 |
| 2024 | $548,991 | $82,349 | 45% | $202,448 | $54,205 | $70,737,179 |
| 2023 | $8,890,581 | $1,333,587 | 45% | $2,290,978 | $1,865,368 | $65,449,410 |
| 2022 | $4,832,044 | $724,807 | 45% | $1,245,150 | $1,013,831 | $58,360,138 |
| 2021 | $2,623,004 | $393,451 | 45% | $675,911 | $550,343 | $61,539,287 |
| 2020 | $753,448 | $113,017 | 45% | $237,549 | $114,688 | $56,252,563 |
| 2019 | $2,226,416 | $333,962 | 45% | $573,716 | $467,133 | $52,255,111 |
| 2018 | $5,739,255 | $860,888 | 45% | $1,478,926 | $1,204,176 | $46,807,094 |
| 2017 | $3,417,529 | $512,629 | 47% | $848,626 | $690,971 | $45,338,143 |
| 2016 | $7,006,451 | $1,050,968 | 47% | $1,739,811 | $1,416,595 | $41,489,278 |
| 2015 | $4,136,789 | $620,518 | 47% | $1,027,229 | $836,394 | $38,092,845 |
| 2014 | $8,243,201 | $1,236,480 | 47% | $2,046,915 | $1,666,647 | $36,372,863 |
| 2013 | $4,092,268 | $613,840 | 47% | $1,016,174 | $827,393 | $32,709,005 |
| 2012 | $3,331,476 | $499,721 | 43% | $889,692 | $724,408 | $29,196,271 |
| 2011 | $8,175,735 | $1,226,360 | 43% | $2,183,382 | $1,777,761 | $26,689,535 |
| 2010 | $4,548,949 | $682,342 | 43% | $1,214,826 | $989,140 | $23,990,537 |
| 2009 | $9,046,165 | $1,356,925 | 43% | $2,415,836 | $1,967,031 | $21,530,715 |
| 2008 | $4,941,083 | $741,162 | 43% | $1,319,548 | $1,074,407 | $17,857,715 |
| 2007 | $17,898,527 | $2,684,779 | 43% | $4,779,916 | $3,891,920 | $18,449,278 |
| 2006 | $13,772,494 | $2,065,874 | 43% | $3,678,033 | $2,994,741 | $13,926,088 |
| 2005 | $17,234,015 | $2,585,102 | 43% | $4,602,454 | $3,747,426 | $10,249,824 |
| 2004 | $15,323,298 | $2,298,495 | 43% | $4,092,185 | $3,331,953 | $6,273,902 |
| 2003 | $6,237,522 | $935,628 | 43% | $1,665,770 | $1,356,309 | $2,790,369 |
| 2002 | $2,812,555 | $421,883 | 46% | $711,579 | $579,384 | $1,306,058 |
| 2001 | $2,116,301 | $317,445 | 46% | $535,426 | $435,956 | $749,249 |
| 2000 | $872,794 | $130,919 | 46% | $270,173 | $130,439 | $313,427 |
| 1999 | $175,457 | $26,319 | 46% | $63,526 | $17,009 | $180,142 |
| 1998 | $5,962 | $894 | 46% | $2,471 | $265 | $152,321 |
| 1997 | $702,131 | $105,320 | 46% | $217,344 | $104,934 | $137,569 |
| 1996 | $300,913 | $45,137 | 46% | $108,948 | $29,171 | $29,171 |
Model Notes
- salary comps: 2 disclosed lead fee(s) flagged as non-market outliers (scale / far-below-quote) and excluded from era medians
Méthodologie
We rebuild Jennifer’s career as a yearly time series. Disclosed salaries and documented backend enter as reported, with citations. Undisclosed lead roles get the median of disclosed salaries for their era and budget band, capped at 15% of the film’s budget. Supporting roles and roles from before the breakthrough get 2.5% of that median, the going-rate ratio measured from disclosed pre-stardom deals. Films with no reported budget are treated as small productions, and every role is estimated unless a source documents it was unpaid. Representation fees come out at sourced rates, taxes follow the eras actually lived through, spending follows measured household savings behavior unless court documents say otherwise, and what remains compounds at real market returns. Undocumented backend enters as an expected value from disclosed deals, endorsements at the median disclosed ambassador fee, and producer or director credits at union-scale floors.
Le modèle complet, chaque tableau de taux et la façon dont nos estimations ont été comparées aux offres réelles sont disponibles. page méthodologie.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is Jennifer Garner's net worth in 2026?
As of 2026, Jennifer Garner's net worth is an estimated $135.9 Million. The estimate is built film by film from disclosed salaries and documented backend, then year by year: income, minus representation fees and taxes, minus spending, compounded at real market returns.
How does Jennifer Garner make money?
Alias salaries built from Variety-covered raise reporting, plus film leads modeled from their budgets. Her Capital One campaign enters as an estimated endorsement line and her documented Juno points at the median disclosed backend rate; the Once Upon a Farm stake stays queued.
How is Jennifer Garner's net worth calculated?
Les jours de paie divulgués sont saisis tels que rapportés, avec des citations. Les rôles principaux non divulgués utilisent la médiane des salaires divulgués pour leur époque et leur tranche budgétaire, plafonnés à 15 % du budget du film, et les rôles de soutien ou en début de carrière utilisent la fraction documentée de cette médiane avant la célébrité. Nous soustrayons les frais de représentation, les impôts pour les années où Jennifer a réellement travaillé et les dépenses du comportement d'épargne mesuré, puis nous composons les rendements réels du marché. Le backend, les avenants et les crédits de production non documentés entrent comme lignes estimées à partir des médianes divulguées. Chaque tarif et source est publié.
How much does Jennifer Garner make per film?
Cela varie selon le rôle et l'époque, et le tableau film par film ci-dessus répertorie les rémunérations comptabilisées pour chaque titre. Les jours de paie divulgués entrent tels que déclarés. Les rôles non divulgués sont calqués sur ce que des acteurs comparables ont gagné à la même époque et dans la même fourchette budgétaire, les rôles principaux après la percée gagnant le plus et les rôles de soutien ou les premiers rôles une fraction documentée de ce montant.
Pourquoi le taux d'imposition est-il si élevé et les acteurs ne l'évitent-ils pas en faisant appel à une société de prêt ?
L'impôt est calculé au taux effectif de l'endroit où Jennifer vivait chaque année, qui est le taux indiqué dans le tableau année par année. Dans un État à fiscalité élevée comme la Californie, l'impôt sur le revenu fédéral et celui de l'État combinés atteignent près de la moitié du revenu d'un haut revenu, de sorte que ces années se situent autour de 40 %. Une société de prêt, par laquelle de nombreux acteurs gèrent leurs revenus, ne réduit pas l’impôt sur l’argent qu’ils rapportent à la maison. Son véritable avantage réside dans la déduction des coûts professionnels tels que les honoraires d’agent, de gestionnaire et d’avocat, et le modèle les soustrait déjà sur une ligne distincte avant l’application de toute taxe. Les entreprises à revenus élevés ne bénéficient également pas de la déduction commerciale répercutée à laquelle les autres propriétaires d’entreprise peuvent prétendre, de sorte que cela ne leur permet pas de réduire les taux.
Pourquoi ce chiffre est-il différent de celui des autres sites à valeur nette ?
Most sites publish a single number with no way to check it. This estimate is built in the open: every salary, rate, and assumption is on the page, and the page méthodologie lists every source.
Quelle est la précision de cette estimation ?
Aucune estimation de la valeur nette d’un particulier n’est exacte ; celui-ci est un modèle construit à partir de données publiques. La différence est que vous pouvez voir comment il a été construit et vérifier chaque étape. Le niveau de confiance situé en haut du calcul indique dans quelle mesure le chiffre repose sur des chiffres divulgués, et la page indique où un chiffre s'appuie sur une hypothèse.
Is Jennifer Garner rich compared to the average person?
Yes. A net worth of $135.9 Million is far above the median American household, which sits near $193,000 according to Federal Reserve data.
What is Jennifer Garner's biggest source of wealth?
On this page it is film salaries, the largest line in the calculation at $79.2 Million. The full breakdown, with every other line and its source, is above.
How much does Jennifer Garner make from endorsements?
The model counts $32.0 Million in career endorsement income for Jennifer: 2 named partnerships x the $4.0M annual fee from the median disclosed film deal x a 4-year term, spread across the deal years. It is an estimate, since the individual deal values are not all public, and it sits as its own line in the calculation above.
What businesses does Jennifer Garner own?
The stake counted on this page is Once Upon a Farm stake. It is valued from a reported transaction or a revenue multiple, and shown as its own line in the calculation above with the basis next to it.
Explorez d'autres acteurs
À propos de NetWorth Explained
We originally created NWE because nobody in the public-figure net worth space showed their work. Magazines and sites threw out big numbers while hiding behind vague claims of “proprietary algorithms” ou “insider knowledge.” That’s why we started the world’s only publication that transparently showed every assumption, every variable, and every calculation. We’re still the only ones who do it this way. En savoir plus sur NetWorth Explained.