Cillian Murphy Чистый капитал 2026
Обновлено August 3, 2026
As of 2026, Cillian Murphy has an estimated net worth of $45.3 Million, computed film by film and year by year from public records and published rates. Every input, rate, and source behind the number is on this page.
Calculation
- Раскрытые зарплаты и документированная внутренняя часть, каждая с цитатой
- Нераскрытые роли, смоделированные на основе раскрытых сопоставимых данных для их эпохи, бюджетного диапазона и этапа карьеры.
- Бэкэнд, одобрение и производство кредитов, оцененных на основе раскрытых медианных значений
Fast Facts
| Birthdate | May 25, 1976 |
|---|---|
| Birthplace | Cork |
| Breakthrough | Oppenheimer (2023) |
| Best Known | Oppenheimer (2023) |
Who Is Cillian Murphy?
Cillian Murphy was born May 25, 1976 in Cork, best known for Oppenheimer (2023). The earnings behind Cillian's net worth come from film salaries, backend participation, and endorsement deals.
The model tracks Cillian's earning years from 1997 to 2026, with the biggest single year in 2025 at about $21.6 Million of gross income. After representation fees, taxes, and living costs, what stays invested compounds at market returns into an estimated $45.3 Million today.
Data
Каждая строка ниже рассчитана на основе общедоступных данных и опубликованных таблиц тарифов на нашем сайте. страницу методики. Уверенность: Оценка С. Документированные цифры охватывают лишь небольшую часть этой цифры, поэтому большая ее часть смоделирована на основе опубликованных показателей и сопоставимых показателей (оценки варьируются от A, в основном документально подтвержденного, до C, в основном смоделированного).
The Calculation
| Line | Amount |
|---|---|
| Revenue | |
| Film pay, modeled lead roles (6 of 76 films) era and budget-band medians of disclosed lead salaries (winsorized, thin cells shrunk toward the era median), blended with this actor's disclosed quote history when available; soft breakthrough blend near the career break year | $38,701,235 |
| Film pay, modeled post-breakthrough supporting roles (2 of 76 films) 12.0% of lead cells: lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio | $3,714,452 |
| Film pay, modeled supporting and early roles (68 of 76 films) 2,5% медианы эпохи: уровень до славы | $34,200,634 |
| Оценочные баллы бэкэнда 12% of disclosed lead deals included points, at a median 2.6% of box office; expected value on 6 commercially viable undisclosed lead roles; cash spread over 3 years; 3 film(s) used band-specific box-office/budget multiples as a gross proxy | $4,801,812 |
| Оценочное количество одобрений (1 партнерство с брендом) 1 named partnerships x the $4.0M annual fee from the median disclosed film deal x a 4-year term, spread across the deal years | $16,000,000 |
| Остатки, расчетные SAG residual rates on post-theatrical receipts assumed at half of box office, split by role share and spread over the ten years after each release; 44 film(s) used band-specific box-office proxies | $45,074,716 |
| Peaky Blinders lead pay (modeled) Lead across six series of Peaky Blinders plus film work; UK prestige-TV leads modeled as annualized series income. (bbc.com) | $3,100,000 |
| Инвестиционная доходность от сбережений mixed portfolio: 55% actual 60/40 securities returns (taxed) + 45% US long-run home-price rate on the rest | $16,917,403 |
| Expenses | |
| Представительские сборы агент 10% + адвокат 5% | -$20,332,587 |
| Taxes Эффективные ставки США-Калифорния, год за годом | -$51,777,131 |
| Личные расходы measured household savings rates by income, times a 88% entertainment-household factor | -$35,031,094 |
| Предполагаемая чистая стоимость | $45,327,168 |
Фильм за фильмом
| Film | Year | Role | Budget | Театральная касса | Зарплата засчитана |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 28 Years Later: The Bone Temple no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $23.8M shrunk median for 2020s/large (n=2) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio) | 2026 | Supporting | $63,000,000 | $58,500,000 | $2,581,048 |
| Peaky Blinders: The Immortal Man no disclosed fee: modeled on the $23.8M shrunk median for 2020s/large (n=2), capped at $10.5M | 2026 | Lead | $70,000,000 | – | $9,319,146 |
| 28 Years Later soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.79): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $23.8M shrunk median for 2020s/large (n=2), capped at $9.0M vs early terms | 2025 | Lead | $60,000,000 | $151,300,000 | $7,246,385 |
| Steve soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.79): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $23.8M shrunk median for 2020s/large (n=2), capped at $10.5M vs early terms | 2025 | Lead | $70,000,000 | – | $8,433,472 |
| Small Things like These soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.66): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $25.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid), capped at $0.5M vs early terms | 2024 | Lead | $3,000,000 | $14,400,000 | $450,000 |
| Kensuke's Kingdom soft-breakthrough supporting blend (w=0.50) | 2023 | Supporting | $10,945,388 | $2,964,000 | $1,133,404 |
| Oppenheimer soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.50): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $16.4M shrunk median for 2020s/tentpole (n=5), capped at $15.0M vs early terms | 2023 | Lead | $100,000,000 | $955,300,000 | $7,705,357 |
| Tommy Shelby soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.50): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $23.8M shrunk median for 2020s/large (n=2), capped at $10.5M vs early terms | 2023 | Lead | $70,000,000 | – | $5,546,875 |
| Pana-vision soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.34): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $23.8M shrunk median for 2020s/large (n=2), capped at $10.5M vs early terms | 2022 | Lead | $70,000,000 | – | $3,954,382 |
| All of This Unreal Time soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.21): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $23.8M shrunk median for 2020s/large (n=2), capped at $10.5M vs early terms | 2021 | Lead | $70,000,000 | – | $2,660,278 |
| A Quiet Place Part II no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $23.8M shrunk median for 2020s/large (n=2) (pre-stardom rate); soft-breakthrough weight 0.12 | 2020 | Lead | $58,000,000 | $297,500,000 | $1,560,039 |
| Anna no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3) (pre-stardom rate); soft-breakthrough weight 0.06 | 2019 | Lead | $40,000,000 | – | $646,948 |
| The Delinquent Season no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3) (pre-stardom rate); soft-breakthrough weight 0.03 | 2018 | Lead | $40,000,000 | $39,194 | $472,199 |
| The Overcoat no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3) (pre-stardom rate) | 2018 | Supporting | $40,000,000 | – | $310,995 |
| Dunkirk no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $20.0M shrunk median for 2010s/tentpole (n=12) (pre-stardom rate); soft-breakthrough weight 0.02 | 2017 | Lead | $100,000,000 | $549,100,000 | $760,800 |
| Fionn Regan no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3) (pre-stardom rate); soft-breakthrough weight 0.02 | 2017 | Lead | $40,000,000 | – | $377,971 |
| The Party no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3) (pre-stardom rate); soft-breakthrough weight 0.02 | 2017 | Lead | $40,000,000 | $6,000,000 | $377,971 |
| Anthropoid no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $5.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid) (pre-stardom rate); soft-breakthrough weight 0.01 | 2016 | Lead | $9,000,000 | $5,300,000 | $136,412 |
| Free Fire no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $5.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid) (pre-stardom rate); soft-breakthrough weight 0.01 | 2016 | Lead | $7,000,000 | $3,800,000 | $133,617 |
| The Frank and Walters no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3) (pre-stardom rate) | 2016 | Supporting | $40,000,000 | – | $284,735 |
| Atlantic: The Wildest Ocean on Earth no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3) (pre-stardom rate) | 2015 | Supporting | $40,000,000 | – | $280,021 |
| In the Heart of the Sea no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $20.0M shrunk median for 2010s/tentpole (n=12) (pre-stardom rate); soft-breakthrough weight 0.00 | 2015 | Lead | $100,000,000 | $94,300,000 | $569,669 |
| Paul Hartnoll no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3) (pre-stardom rate); soft-breakthrough weight 0.00 | 2015 | Lead | $40,000,000 | – | $302,507 |
| Aloft no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3) (pre-stardom rate); soft-breakthrough weight 0.00 | 2014 | Lead | $40,000,000 | $270,971 | $289,156 |
| Ballyturk no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3) (pre-stardom rate); soft-breakthrough weight 0.00 | 2014 | Lead | $40,000,000 | – | $289,156 |
| Grief is the Thing with Feathers no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3) (pre-stardom rate); soft-breakthrough weight 0.00 | 2014 | Lead | $40,000,000 | – | $289,156 |
| Transcendence no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $20.0M shrunk median for 2010s/tentpole (n=12) (pre-stardom rate); soft-breakthrough weight 0.00 | 2014 | Lead | $100,000,000 | $103,039,258 | $535,853 |
| Harriet and the Matches no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3) (pre-stardom rate) | 2013 | Supporting | $40,000,000 | – | $276,328 |
| Broken no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3) (pre-stardom rate); soft-breakthrough weight 0.00 | 2012 | Lead | $40,000,000 | – | $278,738 |
| Red Lights no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $5.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid) (pre-stardom rate); soft-breakthrough weight 0.00 | 2012 | Lead | $14,000,000 | $14,100,000 | $126,290 |
| Темный рыцарь: Возрождение легенды no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $15.8M shrunk median for 2010s/blockbuster (n=11) (pre-stardom rate) | 2012 | Supporting | $250,000,000 | $1,115,000,000 | $395,209 |
| In Time no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3) (pre-stardom rate); soft-breakthrough weight 0.00 | 2011 | Lead | $40,000,000 | $174,000,000 | $276,920 |
| Retreat no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $5.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid) (pre-stardom rate); soft-breakthrough weight 0.00 | 2011 | Lead | $6,400,000 | – | $125,280 |
| From Galway to Broadway and back again. no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3) (pre-stardom rate); soft-breakthrough weight 0.00 | 2010 | Lead | $40,000,000 | – | $275,986 |
| Hippie Hippie Shake no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3) (pre-stardom rate); soft-breakthrough weight 0.00 | 2010 | Lead | $40,000,000 | – | $275,986 |
| Начало no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $20.0M shrunk median for 2010s/tentpole (n=12) (pre-stardom rate); soft-breakthrough weight 0.00 | 2010 | Lead | $160,000,000 | $839,000,000 | $503,358 |
| Peacock no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3) (pre-stardom rate); soft-breakthrough weight 0.00 | 2010 | Lead | $40,000,000 | – | $275,986 |
| Tron: Legacy no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $20.0M shrunk median for 2010s/tentpole (n=12) (pre-stardom rate) | 2010 | Supporting | $170,000,000 | $409,900,000 | $500,327 |
| Feist (singer) no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $19.4M shrunk median for 2000s/mid (n=2) (pre-stardom rate); soft-breakthrough weight 0.00 | 2009 | Lead | $40,000,000 | – | $484,863 |
| Perrier's Bounty no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $19.4M shrunk median for 2000s/mid (n=2) (pre-stardom rate); soft-breakthrough weight 0.00 | 2009 | Lead | $40,000,000 | $160,430 | $484,863 |
| The Dark Knight no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $11.8M shrunk median for 2000s/tentpole (n=9) (pre-stardom rate) | 2008 | Supporting | $185,000,000 | $1,008,999,999 | $295,506 |
| The Edge of Love no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $19.4M shrunk median for 2000s/mid (n=2) (pre-stardom rate); soft-breakthrough weight 0.00 | 2008 | Lead | $40,000,000 | – | $484,625 |
| Waveriders no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $19.4M shrunk median for 2000s/mid (n=2) (pre-stardom rate) | 2008 | Supporting | $40,000,000 | – | $484,459 |
| Sunshine no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $19.4M shrunk median for 2000s/mid (n=2) (pre-stardom rate); soft-breakthrough weight 0.00 | 2007 | Lead | $40,000,000 | $34,800,000 | $484,504 |
| Watching the Detectives no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $18.8M median for its era and nearest band (mid) (pre-stardom rate), capped at 15% of budget; soft-breakthrough weight 0.00 | 2007 | Lead | $2,000,000 | $15,006 | $300,000 |
| Ambassadors Theatre (London) no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $19.4M shrunk median for 2000s/mid (n=2) (pre-stardom rate); soft-breakthrough weight 0.00 | 2006 | Lead | $40,000,000 | – | $484,441 |
| The Silent City no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $19.4M shrunk median for 2000s/mid (n=2) (pre-stardom rate); soft-breakthrough weight 0.00 | 2006 | Lead | $40,000,000 | – | $484,441 |
| The Wind That Shakes the Barley no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $18.8M median for its era and nearest band (mid) (pre-stardom rate); soft-breakthrough weight 0.00 | 2006 | Lead | $8,300,000 | $25,700,000 | $468,759 |
| Batman Begins no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $11.8M shrunk median for 2000s/tentpole (n=9) (pre-stardom rate); soft-breakthrough weight 0.00 | 2005 | Lead | $150,000,000 | $375,400,000 | $295,525 |
| Breakfast on Pluto no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $19.4M shrunk median for 2000s/mid (n=2) (pre-stardom rate); soft-breakthrough weight 0.00 | 2005 | Lead | $40,000,000 | $3,900,000 | $484,409 |
| Red Eye no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $19.4M shrunk median for 2000s/mid (n=2) (pre-stardom rate); soft-breakthrough weight 0.00 | 2005 | Lead | $26,000,000 | $96,200,000 | $484,396 |
| The Playboy of the Western World no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $19.4M shrunk median for 2000s/mid (n=2) (pre-stardom rate); soft-breakthrough weight 0.00 | 2004 | Lead | $40,000,000 | – | $484,392 |
| Cold Mountain no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $20.0M shrunk median for 2000s/large (n=18) (pre-stardom rate); soft-breakthrough weight 0.00 | 2003 | Lead | $79,000,000 | $173,000,000 | $500,018 |
| Girl with a Pearl Earring no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $18.8M median for its era and nearest band (mid) (pre-stardom rate); soft-breakthrough weight 0.00 | 2003 | Lead | $10,000,000 | $31,400,000 | $468,752 |
| Intermission no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $18.8M median for its era and nearest band (mid) (pre-stardom rate); soft-breakthrough weight 0.00 | 2003 | Lead | $5,000,000 | $5,100,000 | $468,750 |
| The Seagull no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $19.4M shrunk median for 2000s/mid (n=2) (pre-stardom rate); soft-breakthrough weight 0.00 | 2003 | Lead | $40,000,000 | – | $484,384 |
| Zonad no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $19.4M shrunk median for 2000s/mid (n=2) (pre-stardom rate); soft-breakthrough weight 0.00 | 2003 | Lead | $40,000,000 | – | $484,384 |
| 28 Days Later no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $18.8M median for its era and nearest band (mid) (pre-stardom rate); soft-breakthrough weight 0.00 | 2002 | Lead | $8,000,000 | $82,800,000 | $468,751 |
| The Shape of Things no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $18.8M median for its era and nearest band (mid) (pre-stardom rate); soft-breakthrough weight 0.00 | 2002 | Lead | $4,000,000 | $826,617 | $468,750 |
| Disco Pigs no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $19.4M shrunk median for 2000s/mid (n=2) (pre-stardom rate); soft-breakthrough weight 0.00 | 2001 | Lead | $40,000,000 | – | $484,377 |
| How Harry Became a Tree no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $19.4M shrunk median for 2000s/mid (n=2) (pre-stardom rate); soft-breakthrough weight 0.00 | 2001 | Lead | $40,000,000 | – | $484,377 |
| On the Edge no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $19.4M shrunk median for 2000s/mid (n=2) (pre-stardom rate); soft-breakthrough weight 0.00 | 2001 | Lead | $40,000,000 | – | $484,377 |
| Peaky Blinders no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $19.4M shrunk median for 2000s/mid (n=2) (pre-stardom rate); soft-breakthrough weight 0.00 | 2001 | Lead | $40,000,000 | – | $484,377 |
| The Way We Live Now no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $19.4M shrunk median for 2000s/mid (n=2) (pre-stardom rate); soft-breakthrough weight 0.00 | 2001 | Lead | $40,000,000 | – | $484,377 |
| Watchmen no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $19.4M shrunk median for 2000s/mid (n=2) (pre-stardom rate); soft-breakthrough weight 0.00 | 2001 | Lead | $40,000,000 | – | $484,377 |
| A Man of Few Words no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $19.4M shrunk median for 2000s/mid (n=2) (pre-stardom rate); soft-breakthrough weight 0.00 | 2000 | Lead | $40,000,000 | – | $484,376 |
| Filleann an Feall no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $19.4M shrunk median for 2000s/mid (n=2) (pre-stardom rate); soft-breakthrough weight 0.00 | 2000 | Lead | $40,000,000 | – | $484,376 |
| At Death's Door no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $14.4M shrunk median for 1990s/mid (n=6) (pre-stardom rate); soft-breakthrough weight 0.00 | 1999 | Lead | $26,000,000 | – | $359,375 |
| Eviction no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $14.4M shrunk median for 1990s/mid (n=6) (pre-stardom rate); soft-breakthrough weight 0.00 | 1999 | Lead | $26,000,000 | – | $359,375 |
| Juno and the Paycock no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $14.4M shrunk median for 1990s/mid (n=6) (pre-stardom rate); soft-breakthrough weight 0.00 | 1999 | Lead | $26,000,000 | – | $359,375 |
| Sunburn no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $14.4M shrunk median for 1990s/mid (n=6) (pre-stardom rate); soft-breakthrough weight 0.00 | 1999 | Lead | $26,000,000 | – | $359,375 |
| The Country Boy no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $14.4M shrunk median for 1990s/mid (n=6) (pre-stardom rate); soft-breakthrough weight 0.00 | 1999 | Lead | $26,000,000 | – | $359,375 |
| The Trench no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $14.4M shrunk median for 1990s/mid (n=6) (pre-stardom rate); soft-breakthrough weight 0.00 | 1999 | Lead | $26,000,000 | – | $359,375 |
| Much Ado About Nothing no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $14.4M shrunk median for 1990s/mid (n=6) (pre-stardom rate); soft-breakthrough weight 0.00 | 1998 | Lead | $26,000,000 | – | $359,375 |
| Sweety Barrett no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $14.4M shrunk median for 1990s/mid (n=6) (pre-stardom rate); soft-breakthrough weight 0.00 | 1998 | Lead | $26,000,000 | – | $359,375 |
| Quando no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $14.4M shrunk median for 1990s/mid (n=6) (pre-stardom rate); soft-breakthrough weight 0.00 | 1997 | Lead | $26,000,000 | – | $359,375 |
Как работают смоделированные фигуры. An undisclosed lead role after the breakthrough gets the median of disclosed lead salaries for its era and budget band, capped at 15% of the film’s budget. Supporting and pre-breakthrough roles get 2.5% of that median, the documented going rate for actors before stardom. Films with no reported budget are treated as small productions. Undocumented backend, endorsements, and producer or director credits enter as separate estimated lines in the calculation above, built from disclosed medians. Every median comes from the published tables on our страницу методики.
Чистый капитал Over Time
Смоделированный баланс на конец каждого года, соответствующий приведенной ниже таблице по годам.
Год за годом
| Year | Income | Плата за представительство | Ставка налога | Spent | Saved | Balance |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | $14,438,432 | $2,165,765 | 45% | $3,720,582 | $3,029,385 | $45,327,168 |
| 2025 | $21,558,896 | $3,233,834 | 45% | $5,555,426 | $4,523,358 | $41,458,254 |
| 2024 | $11,861,229 | $1,779,184 | 45% | $3,056,473 | $2,488,652 | $34,427,185 |
| 2023 | $16,386,262 | $2,457,939 | 45% | $4,222,510 | $3,438,067 | $29,573,715 |
| 2022 | $9,259,691 | $1,388,954 | 45% | $2,386,093 | $1,942,813 | $23,988,409 |
| 2021 | $4,243,714 | $636,557 | 45% | $1,093,546 | $890,391 | $23,657,500 |
| 2020 | $3,590,518 | $538,578 | 45% | $925,226 | $753,341 | $20,999,023 |
| 2019 | $3,321,378 | $498,207 | 45% | $855,873 | $696,872 | $18,845,394 |
| 2018 | $2,629,605 | $394,441 | 45% | $677,612 | $551,728 | $16,403,027 |
| 2017 | $3,333,404 | $500,011 | 47% | $827,736 | $673,962 | $15,759,265 |
| 2016 | $2,862,899 | $429,435 | 47% | $710,903 | $578,834 | $14,018,320 |
| 2015 | $2,767,370 | $415,106 | 47% | $687,181 | $559,519 | $12,775,493 |
| 2014 | $3,319,511 | $497,927 | 47% | $824,286 | $671,153 | $11,926,255 |
| 2013 | $2,786,250 | $417,937 | 47% | $691,869 | $563,336 | $10,607,413 |
| 2012 | $2,528,392 | $379,259 | 43% | $675,223 | $549,783 | $9,198,079 |
| 2011 | $2,271,695 | $340,754 | 43% | $606,671 | $493,966 | $8,106,916 |
| 2010 | $3,102,238 | $465,336 | 43% | $828,472 | $674,562 | $7,331,424 |
| 2009 | $2,360,600 | $354,090 | 43% | $630,413 | $513,297 | $6,231,230 |
| 2008 | $2,512,558 | $376,884 | 43% | $670,995 | $546,340 | $5,219,324 |
| 2007 | $2,038,773 | $305,816 | 43% | $544,467 | $443,318 | $5,136,841 |
| 2006 | $2,593,627 | $389,044 | 43% | $692,645 | $563,968 | $4,489,992 |
| 2005 | $2,137,869 | $320,680 | 43% | $570,932 | $464,866 | $3,681,253 |
| 2004 | $1,316,423 | $197,463 | 43% | $351,559 | $286,248 | $3,103,363 |
| 2003 | $3,030,858 | $454,629 | 43% | $809,410 | $659,041 | $2,671,967 |
| 2002 | $1,512,396 | $226,859 | 46% | $382,638 | $311,552 | $1,833,256 |
| 2001 | $3,232,108 | $484,816 | 46% | $817,726 | $665,812 | $1,568,977 |
| 2000 | $1,211,578 | $181,737 | 46% | $306,530 | $249,584 | $903,553 |
| 1999 | $2,237,194 | $335,579 | 46% | $566,012 | $460,860 | $643,800 |
| 1998 | $745,731 | $111,860 | 46% | $230,841 | $111,450 | $170,814 |
| 1997 | $359,375 | $53,906 | 46% | $111,244 | $53,709 | $53,709 |
Model Notes
- ПРОКСИ РЕЗИДЕНЦИИ: место проживания не указано индивидуально для этой партии; По умолчанию США-Калифорния применяется до тех пор, пока не будет документально подтверждено
- salary comps: 2 disclosed lead fee(s) flagged as non-market outliers (scale / far-below-quote) and excluded from era medians
- Изображение предоставлено: Wikimedia Commons via Wikipedia (Cillian Murphy)
Методология
We rebuild Cillian’s career as a yearly time series. Disclosed salaries and documented backend enter as reported, with citations. Undisclosed lead roles get the median of disclosed salaries for their era and budget band, capped at 15% of the film’s budget. Supporting roles and roles from before the breakthrough get 2.5% of that median, the going-rate ratio measured from disclosed pre-stardom deals. Films with no reported budget are treated as small productions, and every role is estimated unless a source documents it was unpaid. Representation fees come out at sourced rates, taxes follow the eras actually lived through, spending follows measured household savings behavior unless court documents say otherwise, and what remains compounds at real market returns. Undocumented backend enters as an expected value from disclosed deals, endorsements at the median disclosed ambassador fee, and producer or director credits at union-scale floors.
Полная модель, каждая таблица тарифов и то, как наши оценки сверяются с реальными сделками, находятся на сайте. страницу методики.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is Cillian Murphy's net worth in 2026?
As of 2026, Cillian Murphy's net worth is an estimated $45.3 Million. The estimate is built film by film from disclosed salaries and documented backend, then year by year: income, minus representation fees and taxes, minus spending, compounded at real market returns.
How does Cillian Murphy make money?
Заработная плата за фильмы и документальное участие в бэкэнде.
How is Cillian Murphy's net worth calculated?
Disclosed paydays enter as reported, with citations. Undisclosed lead roles use the median of disclosed salaries for their era and budget band, capped at 15% of the film's budget, and supporting or early-career roles use the documented pre-stardom fraction of that median. We subtract sourced representation fees, taxes for the years Cillian actually worked, and spending from measured savings behavior, then compound at real market returns. Undocumented backend, endorsements, and producing credits enter as estimated lines from disclosed medians. Every rate and source is published.
How much does Cillian Murphy make per film?
Это зависит от роли и эпохи, а в приведенной выше таблице для каждого фильма указана оплата за каждый фильм. Раскрытые дни выплаты заработной платы вводятся в соответствии с отчетом. Нераскрытые роли смоделированы на основе того, что сопоставимые актеры зарабатывали в ту же эпоху и в том же бюджетном диапазоне, при этом главные роли после прорыва зарабатывали больше всего, а роли второго плана или ранние роли - документально подтвержденной части этого.
Почему ставка налога такая высокая, и разве актеры не избегают ее с помощью кредитной компании?
Tax comes out at the effective rate for where Cillian lived each year, which is the rate shown in the year-by-year table. In a high-tax state like California, combined federal and state income tax reaches close to half of a top earner's income, so those years run in the mid-40s percent. A loan-out company, the corporation many actors run their income through, does not lower the tax on the money they take home. Its real advantage is deducting business costs such as agent, manager, and attorney fees, and the model already subtracts those as a separate line before any tax is applied. High-earning performers also fall outside the pass-through business deduction that other company owners can claim, so it buys them no rate cut.
Почему эта цифра отличается от других сайтов с чистым капиталом?
Most sites publish a single number with no way to check it. This estimate is built in the open: every salary, rate, and assumption is on the page, and the страницу методики lists every source.
Насколько точна эта оценка?
Никакая оценка собственного капитала частного лица не является точной; это модель, построенная на основе общедоступных данных. Разница в том, что вы можете увидеть, как все было построено, и проверить каждый шаг. Уровень достоверности в верхней части расчета показывает, какая часть цифры основана на раскрытых цифрах, а на странице отмечается, где цифры основаны на предположениях.
Is Cillian Murphy rich compared to the average person?
Yes. A net worth of $45.3 Million is far above the median American household, which sits near $193,000 according to Federal Reserve data.
What is Cillian Murphy's biggest source of wealth?
On this page it is residuals, the largest line in the calculation at $45.1 Million. The full breakdown, with every other line and its source, is above.
How much does Cillian Murphy make from endorsements?
The model counts $16.0 Million in career endorsement income for Cillian: 1 named partnerships x the $4.0M annual fee from the median disclosed film deal x a 4-year term, spread across the deal years. It is an estimate, since the individual deal values are not all public, and it sits as its own line in the calculation above.
Исследуйте других актеров
О NetWorth Explained
We originally created NWE because nobody in the public-figure net worth space showed their work. Magazines and sites threw out big numbers while hiding behind vague claims of “proprietary algorithms” или “insider knowledge.” That’s why we started the world’s only publication that transparently showed every assumption, every variable, and every calculation. We’re still the only ones who do it this way. Подробнее о NetWorth Explained.