Tessa Thompson Чистый капитал 2026
Обновлено August 3, 2026
As of 2026, Tessa Thompson has an estimated net worth of $88.1 Million, computed film by film and year by year from public records and published rates. Every input, rate, and source behind the number is on this page.
Calculation
- Раскрытые зарплаты и документированная внутренняя часть, каждая с цитатой
- Нераскрытые роли, смоделированные на основе раскрытых сопоставимых данных для их эпохи, бюджетного диапазона и этапа карьеры.
- Бэкэнд, одобрение и производство кредитов, оцененных на основе раскрытых медианных значений
Fast Facts
| Birthdate | October 3, 1983 |
|---|---|
| Birthplace | Los Angeles |
| Breakthrough | Creed (2015) |
| Best Known | Thor: Ragnarok (2017) |
Who Is Tessa Thompson?
Tessa Thompson was born October 3, 1983 in Los Angeles, best known for Thor: Ragnarok (2017). The earnings behind Tessa's net worth come from film salaries, backend participation, and endorsement deals.
The model tracks Tessa's earning years from 2005 to 2026, with the biggest single year in 2019 at about $43.1 Million of gross income. After representation fees, taxes, and living costs, what stays invested compounds at market returns into an estimated $88.1 Million today.
Data
Каждая строка ниже рассчитана на основе общедоступных данных и опубликованных таблиц тарифов на нашем сайте. страницу методики. Уверенность: Оценка С. Документированные цифры охватывают лишь небольшую часть этой цифры, поэтому большая ее часть смоделирована на основе опубликованных показателей и сопоставимых показателей (оценки варьируются от A, в основном документально подтвержденного, до C, в основном смоделированного).
The Calculation
| Line | Amount |
|---|---|
| Revenue | |
| Film pay, modeled lead roles (27 of 71 films) era and budget-band medians of disclosed lead salaries (winsorized, thin cells shrunk toward the era median), blended with this actor's disclosed quote history when available; soft breakthrough blend near the career break year | $193,476,167 |
| Film pay, modeled post-breakthrough supporting roles (6 of 71 films) 12.0% of lead cells: lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio | $8,992,708 |
| Film pay, modeled supporting and early roles (38 of 71 films) 2,5% медианы эпохи: уровень до славы | $26,728,917 |
| Оценочные баллы бэкэнда 12% of disclosed lead deals included points, at a median 2.6% of box office; expected value on 24 commercially viable undisclosed lead roles; cash spread over 3 years; 14 film(s) used band-specific box-office/budget multiples as a gross proxy | $20,269,615 |
| Оценочное количество одобрений (1 партнерство с брендом) 1 named partnerships x the $4.0M annual fee from the median disclosed film deal x a 4-year term, spread across the deal years | $16,000,000 |
| Остатки, расчетные SAG residual rates on post-theatrical receipts assumed at half of box office, split by role share and spread over the ten years after each release; 51 film(s) used band-specific box-office proxies | $56,070,514 |
| Инвестиционная доходность от сбережений mixed portfolio: 55% actual 60/40 securities returns (taxed) + 45% US long-run home-price rate on the rest | $24,419,134 |
| Expenses | |
| Представительские сборы агент 10% + адвокат 5% | -$45,767,079 |
| Taxes Эффективные ставки США-Калифорния, год за годом | -$117,322,090 |
| Личные расходы measured household savings rates by income, times a 88% entertainment-household factor | -$78,342,055 |
| Предполагаемая чистая стоимость | $88,101,769 |
Фильм за фильмом
| Film | Year | Role | Budget | Театральная касса | Зарплата засчитана |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| His & Hers no disclosed fee: modeled on the $23.8M shrunk median for 2020s/large (n=2), capped at $10.5M | 2026 | Lead | $70,000,000 | – | $10,475,506 |
| Is God Is no disclosed fee: modeled on the $25.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid), capped at $2.2M | 2026 | Lead | $14,800,000 | $5,000,000 | $2,216,056 |
| The Fear of 13 no disclosed fee: modeled on the $23.8M shrunk median for 2020s/large (n=2), capped at $10.5M | 2026 | Lead | $70,000,000 | – | $10,475,506 |
| Hedda no disclosed fee: modeled on the $23.8M shrunk median for 2020s/large (n=2), capped at $10.5M | 2025 | Lead | $70,000,000 | $15,352 | $10,452,403 |
| Marvel Zombies no disclosed fee: modeled on the $23.8M shrunk median for 2020s/large (n=2), capped at $10.5M | 2025 | Lead | $70,000,000 | – | $10,452,403 |
| Creed III no disclosed fee: modeled on the $23.8M shrunk median for 2020s/large (n=2), capped at $11.2M | 2023 | Lead | $75,000,000 | $276,100,000 | $11,058,334 |
| The Marvels no disclosed fee: modeled on the $18.0M shrunk median for 2020s/blockbuster (n=8) | 2023 | Lead | $220,000,000 | $206,136,557 | $17,684,342 |
| The Listener no disclosed fee: modeled on the $23.8M shrunk median for 2020s/large (n=2), capped at $10.5M | 2022 | Lead | $70,000,000 | – | $10,158,777 |
| Тор: Любовь и гром no disclosed fee: modeled on the $18.0M shrunk median for 2020s/blockbuster (n=8) | 2022 | Lead | $250,000,000 | $760,928,081 | $17,395,487 |
| Passing no disclosed fee: modeled on the $25.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid), capped at $1.5M | 2021 | Lead | $10,000,000 | – | $1,443,152 |
| RuPaul's Drag Race All Stars no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $23.8M shrunk median for 2020s/large (n=2) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio) | 2020 | Supporting | $70,000,000 | – | $2,581,048 |
| Sylvie's Love no disclosed fee: modeled on the $23.8M shrunk median for 2020s/large (n=2), capped at $10.5M | 2020 | Lead | $70,000,000 | – | $9,319,146 |
| The Left Right Game no disclosed fee: modeled on the $23.8M shrunk median for 2020s/large (n=2), capped at $10.5M | 2020 | Lead | $70,000,000 | – | $9,319,146 |
| Мстители: Финал soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.79): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $15.8M shrunk median for 2010s/blockbuster (n=11) vs early terms | 2019 | Lead | $356,000,000 | $2,797,501,328 | $12,561,875 |
| Between Two Ferns: The Movie soft-breakthrough supporting blend (w=0.79) | 2019 | Supporting | $40,000,000 | – | $1,102,004 |
| Brave Girl Rising soft-breakthrough supporting blend (w=0.79) | 2019 | Supporting | $40,000,000 | – | $1,102,004 |
| Drunk History soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.79): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3), capped at $6.0M vs early terms | 2019 | Lead | $40,000,000 | – | $4,805,716 |
| Lady and the Tramp soft-breakthrough supporting blend (w=0.79) | 2019 | Supporting | $60,000,000 | – | $2,003,644 |
| Men in Black: International soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.79): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $20.0M shrunk median for 2010s/tentpole (n=12), capped at $16.5M vs early terms | 2019 | Lead | $110,000,000 | $253,890,701 | $13,162,264 |
| Tuca & Bertie soft-breakthrough supporting blend (w=0.79) | 2019 | Supporting | $40,000,000 | – | $1,102,004 |
| Uneventful Days soft-breakthrough supporting blend (w=0.79) | 2019 | Supporting | $40,000,000 | – | $1,102,004 |
| Annihilation soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.66): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3), capped at $6.0M vs early terms | 2018 | Lead | $40,000,000 | $43,070,915 | $4,057,830 |
| Creed II soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.66): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $20.0M shrunk median for 2010s/large (n=8), capped at $7.5M vs early terms | 2018 | Lead | $50,000,000 | $214,215,889 | $5,125,295 |
| Dear White People soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.66): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $5.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid), capped at $0.2M vs early terms | 2018 | Lead | $1,300,000 | $5,400,000 | $171,253 |
| Dirty Computer soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.66): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3), capped at $6.0M vs early terms | 2018 | Lead | $40,000,000 | – | $4,057,830 |
| Furlough soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.66): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3), capped at $6.0M vs early terms | 2018 | Lead | $40,000,000 | – | $4,057,830 |
| Little Woods soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.66): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $5.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid), capped at $0.0M vs early terms | 2018 | Lead | $171,912 | $171,912 | $25,787 |
| Portlandia soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.66): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3), capped at $6.0M vs early terms | 2018 | Lead | $40,000,000 | – | $4,057,830 |
| Pynk soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.66): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3), capped at $6.0M vs early terms | 2018 | Lead | $40,000,000 | – | $4,057,830 |
| Sorry to Bother You soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.66): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $5.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid), capped at $0.5M vs early terms | 2018 | Lead | $3,200,000 | $18,300,000 | $359,569 |
| Jay-Z soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.50): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3), capped at $6.0M vs early terms | 2017 | Lead | $40,000,000 | – | $3,137,500 |
| South Dakota soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.50): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3), capped at $6.0M vs early terms | 2017 | Lead | $40,000,000 | – | $3,137,500 |
| Тор: Рагнарёк soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.50): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $20.0M shrunk median for 2010s/tentpole (n=12) vs early terms | 2017 | Lead | $180,000,000 | $853,977,126 | $10,250,000 |
| BoJack Horseman soft-breakthrough supporting blend (w=0.34) | 2016 | Supporting | $40,000,000 | – | $629,510 |
| Salt Water soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.34): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3), capped at $6.0M vs early terms | 2016 | Lead | $40,000,000 | – | $2,217,170 |
| Second Stage Theater soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.34): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3), capped at $6.0M vs early terms | 2016 | Lead | $40,000,000 | – | $2,217,170 |
| War on Everyone soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.34): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3), capped at $6.0M vs early terms | 2016 | Lead | $40,000,000 | $698,036 | $2,217,170 |
| Westworld soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.34): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3), capped at $6.0M vs early terms | 2016 | Lead | $40,000,000 | – | $2,217,170 |
| Creed soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.21): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3), capped at $5.2M vs early terms | 2015 | Lead | $35,000,000 | $173,578,883 | $1,312,827 |
| The Grand Romantic soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.21): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3), capped at $6.0M vs early terms | 2015 | Lead | $40,000,000 | – | $1,469,284 |
| Dear White People no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $5.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid) (pre-stardom rate); soft-breakthrough weight 0.12 | 2014 | Lead | $1,300,000 | $5,400,000 | $133,344 |
| Grantham & Rose no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3) (pre-stardom rate); soft-breakthrough weight 0.12 | 2014 | Lead | $40,000,000 | – | $957,437 |
| Points of Origin no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3) (pre-stardom rate); soft-breakthrough weight 0.12 | 2014 | Lead | $40,000,000 | – | $957,437 |
| Selma no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3) (pre-stardom rate); soft-breakthrough weight 0.12 | 2014 | Lead | $20,000,000 | $67,800,000 | $599,828 |
| Automotive no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3) (pre-stardom rate); soft-breakthrough weight 0.06 | 2013 | Lead | $40,000,000 | – | $646,948 |
| Murder on the 13th Floor no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3) (pre-stardom rate); soft-breakthrough weight 0.03 | 2012 | Lead | $40,000,000 | – | $472,199 |
| 666 Park Avenue no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3) (pre-stardom rate); soft-breakthrough weight 0.02 | 2011 | Lead | $40,000,000 | – | $377,971 |
| Copper no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3) (pre-stardom rate); soft-breakthrough weight 0.02 | 2011 | Lead | $40,000,000 | – | $377,971 |
| Off the Map no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3) (pre-stardom rate); soft-breakthrough weight 0.02 | 2011 | Lead | $40,000,000 | – | $377,971 |
| Periphery no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3) (pre-stardom rate); soft-breakthrough weight 0.02 | 2011 | Lead | $40,000,000 | – | $377,971 |
| Red & Blue Marbles no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3) (pre-stardom rate); soft-breakthrough weight 0.02 | 2011 | Lead | $40,000,000 | – | $377,971 |
| Rizzoli & Isles no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3) (pre-stardom rate); soft-breakthrough weight 0.02 | 2011 | Lead | $40,000,000 | – | $377,971 |
| Betwixt no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3) (pre-stardom rate); soft-breakthrough weight 0.01 | 2010 | Lead | $40,000,000 | – | $328,334 |
| Blue Belle no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3) (pre-stardom rate); soft-breakthrough weight 0.01 | 2010 | Lead | $40,000,000 | – | $328,334 |
| Detroit 1-8-7 no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3) (pre-stardom rate); soft-breakthrough weight 0.01 | 2010 | Lead | $40,000,000 | – | $328,334 |
| Everyday Black Man no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3) (pre-stardom rate); soft-breakthrough weight 0.01 | 2010 | Lead | $40,000,000 | – | $328,334 |
| Exquisite Corpse no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3) (pre-stardom rate); soft-breakthrough weight 0.01 | 2010 | Lead | $40,000,000 | – | $328,334 |
| For Colored Girls no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3) (pre-stardom rate); soft-breakthrough weight 0.01 | 2010 | Lead | $21,000,000 | $38,000,000 | $301,783 |
| Heroes no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $19.4M shrunk median for 2000s/mid (n=2) (pre-stardom rate); soft-breakthrough weight 0.00 | 2009 | Lead | $40,000,000 | – | $510,876 |
| Mental no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $19.4M shrunk median for 2000s/mid (n=2) (pre-stardom rate); soft-breakthrough weight 0.00 | 2009 | Lead | $40,000,000 | – | $510,876 |
| Mississippi Damned no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $19.4M shrunk median for 2000s/mid (n=2) (pre-stardom rate); soft-breakthrough weight 0.00 | 2009 | Lead | $40,000,000 | – | $510,876 |
| Private Practice no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $19.4M shrunk median for 2000s/mid (n=2) (pre-stardom rate); soft-breakthrough weight 0.00 | 2009 | Lead | $40,000,000 | – | $510,876 |
| Three Rivers no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $19.4M shrunk median for 2000s/mid (n=2) (pre-stardom rate); soft-breakthrough weight 0.00 | 2009 | Lead | $40,000,000 | – | $510,876 |
| Жизнь no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $19.4M shrunk median for 2000s/mid (n=2) (pre-stardom rate); soft-breakthrough weight 0.00 | 2008 | Lead | $40,000,000 | – | $498,013 |
| Make It Happen no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $19.4M shrunk median for 2000s/mid (n=2) (pre-stardom rate); soft-breakthrough weight 0.00 | 2008 | Lead | $40,000,000 | $10,100,000 | $498,013 |
| The Human Contract no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $19.4M shrunk median for 2000s/mid (n=2) (pre-stardom rate); soft-breakthrough weight 0.00 | 2008 | Lead | $40,000,000 | – | $498,013 |
| Hidden Palms no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $19.4M shrunk median for 2000s/mid (n=2) (pre-stardom rate); soft-breakthrough weight 0.00 | 2007 | Lead | $40,000,000 | – | $491,385 |
| The Initiation of Sarah (2006 film) no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $19.4M shrunk median for 2000s/mid (n=2) (pre-stardom rate); soft-breakthrough weight 0.00 | 2006 | Lead | $40,000,000 | – | $487,977 |
| When a Stranger Calls no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $18.8M median for its era and nearest band (mid) (pre-stardom rate); soft-breakthrough weight 0.00 | 2006 | Lead | $15,000,000 | $67,100,000 | $469,913 |
| Cold Case no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $19.4M shrunk median for 2000s/mid (n=2) (pre-stardom rate); soft-breakthrough weight 0.00 | 2005 | Lead | $40,000,000 | – | $486,225 |
| Veronica Mars no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $19.4M shrunk median for 2000s/mid (n=2) (pre-stardom rate); soft-breakthrough weight 0.00 | 2005 | Lead | $40,000,000 | – | $486,225 |
Как работают смоделированные фигуры. An undisclosed lead role after the breakthrough gets the median of disclosed lead salaries for its era and budget band, capped at 15% of the film’s budget. Supporting and pre-breakthrough roles get 2.5% of that median, the documented going rate for actors before stardom. Films with no reported budget are treated as small productions. Undocumented backend, endorsements, and producer or director credits enter as separate estimated lines in the calculation above, built from disclosed medians. Every median comes from the published tables on our страницу методики.
Чистый капитал Over Time
Смоделированный баланс на конец каждого года, соответствующий приведенной ниже таблице по годам.
Год за годом
| Year | Income | Плата за представительство | Ставка налога | Spent | Saved | Balance |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | $20,764,450 | $3,114,668 | 45% | $5,350,708 | $4,356,672 | $88,101,769 |
| 2025 | $26,165,017 | $3,924,752 | 45% | $6,742,358 | $5,489,787 | $82,082,918 |
| 2024 | $11,756,386 | $1,763,458 | 45% | $3,029,456 | $2,466,654 | $71,392,807 |
| 2023 | $25,371,579 | $3,805,737 | 45% | $6,537,901 | $5,323,312 | $63,822,669 |
| 2022 | $32,685,705 | $4,902,856 | 45% | $8,422,649 | $6,857,919 | $53,693,198 |
| 2021 | $16,551,561 | $2,482,734 | 45% | $4,265,106 | $3,472,749 | $50,259,726 |
| 2020 | $27,154,110 | $4,073,117 | 45% | $6,997,234 | $5,697,313 | $43,153,515 |
| 2019 | $43,097,947 | $6,464,692 | 45% | $11,105,737 | $9,042,553 | $34,865,553 |
| 2018 | $36,704,405 | $5,505,661 | 45% | $9,458,211 | $7,701,098 | $23,339,386 |
| 2017 | $25,679,801 | $3,851,970 | 47% | $6,376,695 | $5,192,055 | $15,547,490 |
| 2016 | $12,858,966 | $1,928,845 | 47% | $3,193,082 | $2,599,882 | $9,622,995 |
| 2015 | $5,988,071 | $898,211 | 47% | $1,486,931 | $1,210,695 | $6,676,128 |
| 2014 | $3,752,903 | $562,936 | 47% | $931,904 | $758,779 | $5,335,813 |
| 2013 | $2,270,407 | $340,561 | 47% | $563,777 | $459,041 | $4,313,644 |
| 2012 | $1,506,244 | $225,937 | 43% | $402,252 | $327,523 | $3,529,935 |
| 2011 | $2,461,706 | $369,256 | 43% | $657,414 | $535,282 | $3,001,942 |
| 2010 | $2,543,218 | $381,483 | 43% | $679,183 | $553,006 | $2,375,443 |
| 2009 | $2,666,012 | $399,902 | 43% | $711,975 | $579,707 | $1,705,912 |
| 2008 | $2,018,034 | $302,705 | 43% | $538,929 | $438,809 | $1,027,999 |
| 2007 | $1,103,981 | $165,597 | 43% | $294,825 | $240,054 | $647,676 |
| 2006 | $1,040,907 | $156,136 | 43% | $277,981 | $226,339 | $389,946 |
| 2005 | $972,449 | $145,867 | 43% | $317,745 | $153,407 | $153,407 |
Model Notes
- ПРОКСИ РЕЗИДЕНЦИИ: место проживания не указано индивидуально для этой партии; По умолчанию США-Калифорния применяется до тех пор, пока не будет документально подтверждено
- salary comps: 2 disclosed lead fee(s) flagged as non-market outliers (scale / far-below-quote) and excluded from era medians
- Изображение предоставлено: Wikimedia Commons via Wikipedia (Tessa Thompson)
Методология
We rebuild Tessa’s career as a yearly time series. Disclosed salaries and documented backend enter as reported, with citations. Undisclosed lead roles get the median of disclosed salaries for their era and budget band, capped at 15% of the film’s budget. Supporting roles and roles from before the breakthrough get 2.5% of that median, the going-rate ratio measured from disclosed pre-stardom deals. Films with no reported budget are treated as small productions, and every role is estimated unless a source documents it was unpaid. Representation fees come out at sourced rates, taxes follow the eras actually lived through, spending follows measured household savings behavior unless court documents say otherwise, and what remains compounds at real market returns. Undocumented backend enters as an expected value from disclosed deals, endorsements at the median disclosed ambassador fee, and producer or director credits at union-scale floors.
Полная модель, каждая таблица тарифов и то, как наши оценки сверяются с реальными сделками, находятся на сайте. страницу методики.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is Tessa Thompson's net worth in 2026?
As of 2026, Tessa Thompson's net worth is an estimated $88.1 Million. The estimate is built film by film from disclosed salaries and documented backend, then year by year: income, minus representation fees and taxes, minus spending, compounded at real market returns.
How does Tessa Thompson make money?
Заработная плата за фильмы и документальное участие в бэкэнде.
How is Tessa Thompson's net worth calculated?
Disclosed paydays enter as reported, with citations. Undisclosed lead roles use the median of disclosed salaries for their era and budget band, capped at 15% of the film's budget, and supporting or early-career roles use the documented pre-stardom fraction of that median. We subtract sourced representation fees, taxes for the years Tessa actually worked, and spending from measured savings behavior, then compound at real market returns. Undocumented backend, endorsements, and producing credits enter as estimated lines from disclosed medians. Every rate and source is published.
How much does Tessa Thompson make per film?
Это зависит от роли и эпохи, а в приведенной выше таблице для каждого фильма указана оплата за каждый фильм. Раскрытые дни выплаты заработной платы вводятся в соответствии с отчетом. Нераскрытые роли смоделированы на основе того, что сопоставимые актеры зарабатывали в ту же эпоху и в том же бюджетном диапазоне, при этом главные роли после прорыва зарабатывали больше всего, а роли второго плана или ранние роли - документально подтвержденной части этого.
Почему ставка налога такая высокая, и разве актеры не избегают ее с помощью кредитной компании?
Tax comes out at the effective rate for where Tessa lived each year, which is the rate shown in the year-by-year table. In a high-tax state like California, combined federal and state income tax reaches close to half of a top earner's income, so those years run in the mid-40s percent. A loan-out company, the corporation many actors run their income through, does not lower the tax on the money they take home. Its real advantage is deducting business costs such as agent, manager, and attorney fees, and the model already subtracts those as a separate line before any tax is applied. High-earning performers also fall outside the pass-through business deduction that other company owners can claim, so it buys them no rate cut.
Почему эта цифра отличается от других сайтов с чистым капиталом?
Most sites publish a single number with no way to check it. This estimate is built in the open: every salary, rate, and assumption is on the page, and the страницу методики lists every source.
Насколько точна эта оценка?
Никакая оценка собственного капитала частного лица не является точной; это модель, построенная на основе общедоступных данных. Разница в том, что вы можете увидеть, как все было построено, и проверить каждый шаг. Уровень достоверности в верхней части расчета показывает, какая часть цифры основана на раскрытых цифрах, а на странице отмечается, где цифры основаны на предположениях.
Is Tessa Thompson rich compared to the average person?
Yes. A net worth of $88.1 Million is far above the median American household, which sits near $193,000 according to Federal Reserve data.
What is Tessa Thompson's biggest source of wealth?
On this page it is film salaries, the largest line in the calculation at $193.5 Million. The full breakdown, with every other line and its source, is above.
How much does Tessa Thompson make from endorsements?
The model counts $16.0 Million in career endorsement income for Tessa: 1 named partnerships x the $4.0M annual fee from the median disclosed film deal x a 4-year term, spread across the deal years. It is an estimate, since the individual deal values are not all public, and it sits as its own line in the calculation above.
Исследуйте других актеров
О NetWorth Explained
We originally created NWE because nobody in the public-figure net worth space showed their work. Magazines and sites threw out big numbers while hiding behind vague claims of “proprietary algorithms” или “insider knowledge.” That’s why we started the world’s only publication that transparently showed every assumption, every variable, and every calculation. We’re still the only ones who do it this way. Подробнее о NetWorth Explained.