Zoe Saldaña Чистый капитал 2026
Обновлено August 3, 2026
As of 2026, Zoe Saldaña has an estimated net worth of $191.8 Million, computed film by film and year by year from public records and published rates. Every input, rate, and source behind the number is on this page.
Calculation
- Раскрытые зарплаты и документированная внутренняя часть, каждая с цитатой
- Нераскрытые роли, смоделированные на основе раскрытых сопоставимых данных для их эпохи, бюджетного диапазона и этапа карьеры.
- Бэкэнд, одобрение и производство кредитов, оцененных на основе раскрытых медианных значений
Fast Facts
| Birthdate | June 19, 1978 |
|---|---|
| Birthplace | Passaic |
| Breakthrough | Avatar (2009) |
| Best Known | Avatar (2009) |
Who Is Zoe Saldaña?
Zoe Saldaña was born June 19, 1978 in Passaic, best known for Avatar (2009). The earnings behind Zoe's net worth come from film salaries, backend participation, and endorsement deals.
The model tracks Zoe's earning years from 1999 to 2026, with the biggest single year in 2022 at about $71.6 Million of gross income. After representation fees, taxes, and living costs, what stays invested compounds at market returns into an estimated $191.8 Million today.
Data
Каждая строка ниже рассчитана на основе общедоступных данных и опубликованных таблиц тарифов на нашем сайте. страницу методики. Уверенность: Оценка С. Документированные цифры охватывают лишь небольшую часть этой цифры, поэтому большая ее часть смоделирована на основе опубликованных показателей и сопоставимых показателей (оценки варьируются от A, в основном документально подтвержденного, до C, в основном смоделированного).
The Calculation
| Line | Amount |
|---|---|
| Revenue | |
| Film pay, modeled lead roles (38 of 67 films) era and budget-band medians of disclosed lead salaries (winsorized, thin cells shrunk toward the era median), blended with this actor's disclosed quote history when available; soft breakthrough blend near the career break year | $346,858,682 |
| Film pay, modeled post-breakthrough supporting roles (10 of 67 films) 12.0% of lead cells: lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio | $22,131,203 |
| Film pay, modeled supporting and early roles (19 of 67 films) 2,5% медианы эпохи: уровень до славы | $14,835,069 |
| Оценочные баллы бэкэнда 12% of disclosed lead deals included points, at a median 2.6% of box office; expected value on 29 commercially viable undisclosed lead roles; cash spread over 3 years; 10 film(s) used band-specific box-office/budget multiples as a gross proxy | $52,854,969 |
| Оценочное количество одобрений (2 партнерства с брендами) 2 named partnerships x the $4.0M annual fee from the median disclosed film deal x a 4-year term, spread across the deal years | $32,000,000 |
| Остатки, расчетные SAG residual rates on post-theatrical receipts assumed at half of box office, split by role share and spread over the ten years after each release; 24 film(s) used band-specific box-office proxies | $115,374,440 |
| TV: Law & Order Belinca; guest default per credited year; broadcast network family; priced from tv_episode_rates.csv (en.wikipedia.org) | $150,000 |
| TV: Law & Order: Special Victims Unit Gabrielle Vega; guest default per credited year; broadcast network family; priced from tv_episode_rates.csv (en.wikipedia.org) | $30,000 |
| TV: Six Degrees Regina; recurring default per credited year; broadcast network family; priced from tv_episode_rates.csv (en.wikipedia.org) | $900,000 |
| TV: Comedy Bang! Bang! Herself; guest default per credited year; network not identified, priced on the broadcast cell; priced from tv_episode_rates.csv (en.wikipedia.org) | $30,000 |
| TV: Rosemary's Baby Rosemary Woodhouse; series episode total for a full-run credit; broadcast network family; priced from tv_episode_rates.csv (en.wikipedia.org) | $500,000 |
| TV: Lip Sync Battle Herself; guest default per credited year; reality format tier; priced from tv_episode_rates.csv (en.wikipedia.org) | $30,000 |
| TV: Home Movie: The Princess Bride Princess Buttercup; guest default per credited year; streaming network family; priced from tv_episode_rates.csv (en.wikipedia.org) | $30,000 |
| TV: Maya and the Three Princess Maya (voice); series episode total for a full-run credit; animation format tier; priced from tv_episode_rates.csv (en.wikipedia.org) | $315,000 |
| TV: From Scratch Amy; series episode total for a full-run credit; streaming network family; priced from tv_episode_rates.csv (en.wikipedia.org) | $6,000,000 |
| TV: MPower Herself; guest default per credited year; network not identified, priced on the broadcast cell; priced from tv_episode_rates.csv (en.wikipedia.org) | $30,000 |
| TV: Marvel Studios: Assembled Herself; guest default per credited year; network not identified, priced on the broadcast cell; priced from tv_episode_rates.csv (en.wikipedia.org) | $30,000 |
| TV: Lioness Joe McNamara; estimated ~12 episodes per credited year (no published count); network not identified, priced on the broadcast cell; priced from tv_episode_rates.csv (en.wikipedia.org) | $12,000,000 |
| Инвестиционная доходность от сбережений mixed portfolio: 55% actual 60/40 securities returns (taxed) + 45% US long-run home-price rate on the rest | $72,738,819 |
| Expenses | |
| Представительские сборы агент 10% + адвокат 5% | -$85,362,657 |
| Taxes Эффективные ставки США-Калифорния, год за годом | -$218,118,762 |
| Личные расходы measured household savings rates by income, times a 88% entertainment-household factor | -$146,520,908 |
| Предполагаемая чистая стоимость | $191,820,872 |
Фильм за фильмом
| Film | Year | Role | Budget | Театральная касса | Зарплата засчитана |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| The Bluff no disclosed fee: modeled on the $23.8M shrunk median for 2020s/large (n=2), capped at $10.5M | 2026 | Lead | $70,000,000 | – | $10,499,881 |
| Avatar: Fire and Ash no disclosed fee: modeled on the $18.0M shrunk median for 2020s/blockbuster (n=8) | 2025 | Lead | $250,000,000 | $1,490,000,000 | $17,999,591 |
| Elio no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $23.8M shrunk median for 2020s/large (n=2) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio) | 2025 | Supporting | $70,000,000 | $154,000,000 | $2,849,947 |
| Dovecote no disclosed fee: modeled on the $23.8M shrunk median for 2020s/large (n=2), capped at $10.5M | 2024 | Lead | $70,000,000 | – | $10,499,550 |
| Emilia Pérez no disclosed fee: modeled on the $21.7M shrunk median for 2020s/mid (n=1), capped at $3.9M | 2024 | Lead | $26,000,000 | $16,300,000 | $3,899,848 |
| Good Burger 2 no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $23.8M shrunk median for 2020s/large (n=2) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio) | 2023 | Supporting | $70,000,000 | – | $2,849,801 |
| Guardians of the Galaxy Vol. 3 no disclosed fee: modeled on the $18.0M shrunk median for 2020s/blockbuster (n=8) | 2023 | Lead | $250,000,000 | $845,555,777 | $17,998,448 |
| Lioness no disclosed fee: modeled on the $23.8M shrunk median for 2020s/large (n=2), capped at $10.5M | 2023 | Lead | $70,000,000 | – | $10,499,124 |
| MPower no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $23.8M shrunk median for 2020s/large (n=2) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio) | 2023 | Supporting | $70,000,000 | – | $2,849,801 |
| The Absence of Eden no disclosed fee: modeled on the $25.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid), capped at $0.0M | 2023 | Lead | $37,265 | $37,265 | $5,590 |
| Amsterdam no disclosed fee: modeled on the $23.8M shrunk median for 2020s/large (n=2), capped at $12.0M | 2022 | Lead | $80,000,000 | $31,200,000 | $11,998,036 |
| Avatar: The Way of Water no disclosed fee: modeled on the $18.0M shrunk median for 2020s/blockbuster (n=8) | 2022 | Lead | $250,000,000 | $2,176,229,105 | $17,996,978 |
| From Scratch no disclosed fee: modeled on the $23.8M shrunk median for 2020s/large (n=2), capped at $10.5M | 2022 | Lead | $70,000,000 | – | $10,498,294 |
| Guardians of the Galaxy: Cosmic Rewind no disclosed fee: modeled on the $23.8M shrunk median for 2020s/large (n=2), capped at $10.5M | 2022 | Lead | $70,000,000 | – | $10,498,294 |
| The Adam Project no disclosed fee: modeled on the $16.4M shrunk median for 2020s/tentpole (n=5) | 2022 | Lead | $116,000,000 | – | $16,425,813 |
| Maya and the Three no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $23.8M shrunk median for 2020s/large (n=2) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio) | 2021 | Supporting | $70,000,000 | – | $2,849,243 |
| Vivo no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $23.8M shrunk median for 2020s/large (n=2) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio) | 2021 | Supporting | $70,000,000 | $1,300,000 | $2,849,243 |
| Домашний фильм: Принцесса-невеста no disclosed fee: modeled on the $23.8M shrunk median for 2020s/large (n=2), capped at $10.5M | 2020 | Lead | $70,000,000 | – | $10,493,532 |
| Vampires vs. the Bronx no disclosed fee: modeled on the $23.8M shrunk median for 2020s/large (n=2), capped at $10.5M | 2020 | Lead | $70,000,000 | – | $10,493,532 |
| Мстители: Финал no disclosed fee: modeled on the $15.8M shrunk median for 2010s/blockbuster (n=11) | 2019 | Lead | $356,000,000 | $2,797,501,328 | $15,749,689 |
| Missing Link no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $20.0M shrunk median for 2010s/tentpole (n=12) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio) | 2019 | Supporting | $100,000,000 | $26,600,000 | $2,397,585 |
| Мстители: Война бесконечности no disclosed fee: modeled on the $15.8M shrunk median for 2010s/blockbuster (n=11) | 2018 | Lead | $400,000,000 | $2,048,359,754 | $15,731,214 |
| Стражи Галактики Том. 2 no disclosed fee: modeled on the $15.8M shrunk median for 2010s/blockbuster (n=11) | 2017 | Lead | $200,000,000 | $863,756,051 | $15,695,358 |
| Guardians of the Galaxy – Mission: Breakout! no disclosed fee: modeled on the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3), capped at $6.0M | 2017 | Lead | $40,000,000 | – | $5,972,493 |
| I Kill Giants no disclosed fee: modeled on the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3), capped at $6.0M | 2017 | Lead | $40,000,000 | $342,558 | $5,972,493 |
| My Little Pony: The Movie no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $5.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio) | 2017 | Supporting | $6,500,000 | $61,300,000 | $597,718 |
| Live by Night no disclosed fee: modeled on the $20.0M shrunk median for 2010s/large (n=8), capped at $9.8M | 2016 | Lead | $65,000,000 | $15,885,366 | $9,663,827 |
| Nina no disclosed fee: modeled on the $5.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid), capped at $0.0M | 2016 | Lead | $22,584 | $22,584 | $3,388 |
| Star Trek Beyond no disclosed fee: modeled on the $20.0M shrunk median for 2010s/tentpole (n=12) | 2016 | Lead | $185,000,000 | $343,471,816 | $19,818,339 |
| Unity no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio) | 2015 | Supporting | $40,000,000 | – | $1,301,204 |
| Guardians of the Galaxy no disclosed fee: modeled on the $20.0M shrunk median for 2010s/tentpole (n=12) | 2014 | Lead | $170,000,000 | $772,776,600 | $19,328,319 |
| Infinitely Polar Bear no disclosed fee: modeled on the $5.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid), capped at $1.0M | 2014 | Lead | $6,700,000 | $2,100,000 | $974,688 |
| Rosemary's Baby no disclosed fee: modeled on the $5.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid), capped at $0.3M | 2014 | Lead | $2,300,000 | – | $337,422 |
| The Book of Life no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $20.0M shrunk median for 2010s/large (n=8) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio) | 2014 | Supporting | $50,000,000 | $100,000,000 | $2,334,554 |
| Blood Ties no disclosed fee: modeled on the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3), capped at $3.8M | 2013 | Lead | $25,000,000 | $2,500,000 | $3,524,232 |
| Комедийный взрыв! Хлопнуть! no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio) | 2013 | Supporting | $40,000,000 | – | $1,252,107 |
| Out of the Furnace no disclosed fee: modeled on the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3), capped at $3.3M | 2013 | Lead | $22,000,000 | $15,700,000 | $3,103,468 |
| Star Trek no disclosed fee: modeled on the $20.0M shrunk median for 2010s/tentpole (n=12) | 2013 | Lead | $187,500,000 | $467,400,000 | $18,733,101 |
| Star Trek Into Darkness no disclosed fee: modeled on the $20.0M shrunk median for 2010s/tentpole (n=12) | 2013 | Lead | $190,000,000 | $467,400,000 | $18,733,101 |
| The Words no disclosed fee: modeled on the $5.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid), capped at $0.9M | 2012 | Lead | $6,000,000 | $16,399,999 | $807,618 |
| Colombiana soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.79): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3), capped at $6.0M vs early terms | 2011 | Lead | $40,000,000 | $63,500,000 | $4,805,716 |
| Burning Palms soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.66): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $5.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid), capped at $0.8M vs early terms | 2010 | Lead | $5,000,000 | $3,200,000 | $537,973 |
| Death at a Funeral soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.66): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3), capped at $3.1M vs early terms | 2010 | Lead | $21,000,000 | $49,100,000 | $2,174,675 |
| Takers soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.66): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3), capped at $4.8M vs early terms | 2010 | Lead | $32,000,000 | $69,100,000 | $3,264,923 |
| The Losers soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.66): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3), capped at $3.8M vs early terms | 2010 | Lead | $25,000,000 | $29,379,723 | $2,571,128 |
| Avatar soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.50): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $20.0M shrunk median for 2000s/blockbuster (n=1) vs early terms | 2009 | Lead | $237,000,000 | $2,924,000,000 | $10,250,000 |
| Star Trek soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.50): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $11.8M shrunk median for 2000s/tentpole (n=9) vs early terms | 2009 | Lead | $150,000,000 | $385,700,000 | $6,056,818 |
| The Skeptic soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.50): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $19.4M shrunk median for 2000s/mid (n=2), capped at $6.0M vs early terms | 2009 | Lead | $40,000,000 | $6,671 | $3,242,188 |
| Vantage Point soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.34): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $19.4M shrunk median for 2000s/mid (n=2), capped at $6.0M vs early terms | 2008 | Lead | $40,000,000 | $152,000,000 | $2,355,516 |
| After Sex soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.21): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $18.8M median for its era and nearest band (mid), capped at $0.1M vs early terms | 2007 | Lead | $825,000 | – | $123,750 |
| Blackout soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.21): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $19.4M shrunk median for 2000s/mid (n=2), capped at $6.0M vs early terms | 2007 | Lead | $40,000,000 | – | $1,634,981 |
| Premium no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $19.4M shrunk median for 2000s/mid (n=2) (pre-stardom rate); soft-breakthrough weight 0.12 | 2006 | Lead | $40,000,000 | – | $1,141,854 |
| The Heart Specialist no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $18.8M median for its era and nearest band (mid) (pre-stardom rate), capped at 15% of budget; soft-breakthrough weight 0.12 | 2006 | Lead | $3,000,000 | $1,100,000 | $450,000 |
| Constellation no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $19.4M shrunk median for 2000s/mid (n=2) (pre-stardom rate); soft-breakthrough weight 0.06 | 2005 | Lead | $40,000,000 | – | $842,721 |
| Dirty Deeds no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $19.4M shrunk median for 2000s/mid (n=2) (pre-stardom rate); soft-breakthrough weight 0.06 | 2005 | Lead | $40,000,000 | $146,490 | $842,721 |
| Guess Who no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $19.4M shrunk median for 2000s/mid (n=2) (pre-stardom rate); soft-breakthrough weight 0.06 | 2005 | Lead | $35,000,000 | $103,000,000 | $793,994 |
| The Curse of Father Cardona no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $19.4M shrunk median for 2000s/mid (n=2) (pre-stardom rate); soft-breakthrough weight 0.06 | 2005 | Lead | $40,000,000 | – | $842,721 |
| Haven no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $19.4M shrunk median for 2000s/mid (n=2) (pre-stardom rate); soft-breakthrough weight 0.03 | 2004 | Lead | $40,000,000 | – | $674,362 |
| Six Degrees no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $19.4M shrunk median for 2000s/mid (n=2) (pre-stardom rate); soft-breakthrough weight 0.03 | 2004 | Lead | $40,000,000 | – | $674,362 |
| Temptation no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $19.4M shrunk median for 2000s/mid (n=2) (pre-stardom rate); soft-breakthrough weight 0.03 | 2004 | Lead | $40,000,000 | – | $674,362 |
| The Terminal no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $20.0M shrunk median for 2000s/large (n=18) (pre-stardom rate); soft-breakthrough weight 0.03 | 2004 | Lead | $60,000,000 | $219,000,000 | $792,784 |
| Pirates of the Caribbean: The Curse of the Black Pearl no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $11.8M shrunk median for 2000s/tentpole (n=9) (pre-stardom rate); soft-breakthrough weight 0.02 | 2003 | Lead | $140,000,000 | $654,264,015 | $502,705 |
| Crossroads no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $18.8M median for its era and nearest band (mid) (pre-stardom rate); soft-breakthrough weight 0.01 | 2002 | Lead | $11,000,000 | $61,700,000 | $479,754 |
| Drumline no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $19.4M shrunk median for 2000s/mid (n=2) (pre-stardom rate); soft-breakthrough weight 0.01 | 2002 | Lead | $20,000,000 | $57,600,000 | $507,810 |
| Get Over It no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $19.4M shrunk median for 2000s/mid (n=2) (pre-stardom rate); soft-breakthrough weight 0.00 | 2001 | Lead | $22,000,000 | $19,900,000 | $497,903 |
| Snipes no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $19.4M shrunk median for 2000s/mid (n=2) (pre-stardom rate); soft-breakthrough weight 0.00 | 2001 | Lead | $40,000,000 | – | $510,876 |
| Center Stage no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $19.4M shrunk median for 2000s/mid (n=2) (pre-stardom rate); soft-breakthrough weight 0.00 | 2000 | Lead | $23,500,000 | $26,300,000 | $491,893 |
Как работают смоделированные фигуры. An undisclosed lead role after the breakthrough gets the median of disclosed lead salaries for its era and budget band, capped at 15% of the film’s budget. Supporting and pre-breakthrough roles get 2.5% of that median, the documented going rate for actors before stardom. Films with no reported budget are treated as small productions. Undocumented backend, endorsements, and producer or director credits enter as separate estimated lines in the calculation above, built from disclosed medians. Every median comes from the published tables on our страницу методики.
Чистый капитал Over Time
Смоделированный баланс на конец каждого года, соответствующий приведенной ниже таблице по годам.
Год за годом
| Year | Income | Плата за представительство | Ставка налога | Spent | Saved | Balance |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | $19,357,171 | $2,903,576 | 45% | $4,988,072 | $4,061,405 | $191,820,872 |
| 2025 | $29,718,079 | $4,457,712 | 45% | $7,657,933 | $6,235,269 | $184,032,802 |
| 2024 | $30,029,129 | $4,504,369 | 45% | $7,738,086 | $6,300,532 | $165,725,893 |
| 2023 | $41,806,966 | $6,271,045 | 45% | $10,773,070 | $8,771,687 | $147,621,064 |
| 2022 | $71,551,543 | $10,732,731 | 45% | $18,437,831 | $15,012,515 | $127,441,865 |
| 2021 | $32,635,458 | $4,895,319 | 45% | $8,409,701 | $6,847,376 | $120,649,826 |
| 2020 | $26,540,857 | $3,981,128 | 45% | $6,839,207 | $5,568,643 | $104,964,589 |
| 2019 | $30,059,211 | $4,508,882 | 45% | $7,745,838 | $6,306,843 | $92,521,247 |
| 2018 | $23,884,033 | $3,582,605 | 45% | $6,154,581 | $5,011,205 | $77,922,443 |
| 2017 | $29,301,018 | $4,395,153 | 47% | $7,275,900 | $5,924,209 | $72,487,909 |
| 2016 | $33,623,183 | $5,043,477 | 47% | $8,349,161 | $6,798,083 | $61,855,650 |
| 2015 | $14,976,338 | $2,246,451 | 47% | $3,718,858 | $3,027,982 | $52,337,384 |
| 2014 | $21,987,953 | $3,298,193 | 47% | $5,459,952 | $4,445,621 | $48,139,962 |
| 2013 | $42,765,703 | $6,414,855 | 47% | $10,619,391 | $8,646,558 | $41,179,896 |
| 2012 | $25,527,500 | $3,829,125 | 43% | $6,817,282 | $5,550,792 | $29,793,103 |
| 2011 | $18,342,748 | $2,751,412 | 43% | $4,898,548 | $3,988,513 | $22,724,752 |
| 2010 | $22,023,490 | $3,303,524 | 43% | $5,881,514 | $4,788,867 | $18,043,374 |
| 2009 | $28,729,954 | $4,309,493 | 43% | $7,672,518 | $6,247,145 | $12,407,029 |
| 2008 | $8,525,084 | $1,278,763 | 43% | $2,276,678 | $1,853,725 | $5,622,737 |
| 2007 | $3,357,276 | $503,591 | 43% | $896,582 | $730,018 | $4,143,137 |
| 2006 | $3,019,264 | $452,890 | 43% | $806,314 | $656,520 | $3,265,112 |
| 2005 | $3,586,126 | $537,919 | 43% | $957,698 | $779,780 | $2,445,957 |
| 2004 | $3,526,204 | $528,931 | 43% | $941,695 | $766,750 | $1,607,627 |
| 2003 | $1,336,470 | $200,470 | 43% | $356,913 | $290,607 | $797,552 |
| 2002 | $911,058 | $136,659 | 46% | $282,018 | $136,158 | $461,696 |
| 2001 | $1,018,037 | $152,706 | 46% | $257,564 | $209,715 | $335,651 |
| 2000 | $646,959 | $97,044 | 46% | $200,266 | $96,688 | $125,990 |
| 1999 | $297,568 | $44,635 | 46% | $107,737 | $28,846 | $28,846 |
Model Notes
- ПРОКСИ РЕЗИДЕНЦИИ: место проживания не указано индивидуально для этой партии; По умолчанию США-Калифорния применяется до тех пор, пока не будет документально подтверждено
- salary comps: 2 disclosed lead fee(s) flagged as non-market outliers (scale / far-below-quote) and excluded from era medians
- Изображение предоставлено: Wikimedia Commons via Wikipedia (Zoe Saldaña)
Методология
We rebuild Zoe’s career as a yearly time series. Disclosed salaries and documented backend enter as reported, with citations. Undisclosed lead roles get the median of disclosed salaries for their era and budget band, capped at 15% of the film’s budget. Supporting roles and roles from before the breakthrough get 2.5% of that median, the going-rate ratio measured from disclosed pre-stardom deals. Films with no reported budget are treated as small productions, and every role is estimated unless a source documents it was unpaid. Representation fees come out at sourced rates, taxes follow the eras actually lived through, spending follows measured household savings behavior unless court documents say otherwise, and what remains compounds at real market returns. Undocumented backend enters as an expected value from disclosed deals, endorsements at the median disclosed ambassador fee, and producer or director credits at union-scale floors.
Полная модель, каждая таблица тарифов и то, как наши оценки сверяются с реальными сделками, находятся на сайте. страницу методики.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is Zoe Saldaña's net worth in 2026?
As of 2026, Zoe Saldaña's net worth is an estimated $191.8 Million. The estimate is built film by film from disclosed salaries and documented backend, then year by year: income, minus representation fees and taxes, minus spending, compounded at real market returns.
How does Zoe Saldaña make money?
Заработная плата за фильмы и документальное участие в бэкэнде.
How is Zoe Saldaña's net worth calculated?
Disclosed paydays enter as reported, with citations. Undisclosed lead roles use the median of disclosed salaries for their era and budget band, capped at 15% of the film's budget, and supporting or early-career roles use the documented pre-stardom fraction of that median. We subtract sourced representation fees, taxes for the years Zoe actually worked, and spending from measured savings behavior, then compound at real market returns. Undocumented backend, endorsements, and producing credits enter as estimated lines from disclosed medians. Every rate and source is published.
How much does Zoe Saldaña make per film?
Это зависит от роли и эпохи, а в приведенной выше таблице для каждого фильма указана оплата за каждый фильм. Раскрытые дни выплаты заработной платы вводятся в соответствии с отчетом. Нераскрытые роли смоделированы на основе того, что сопоставимые актеры зарабатывали в ту же эпоху и в том же бюджетном диапазоне, при этом главные роли после прорыва зарабатывали больше всего, а роли второго плана или ранние роли - документально подтвержденной части этого.
Почему ставка налога такая высокая, и разве актеры не избегают ее с помощью кредитной компании?
Tax comes out at the effective rate for where Zoe lived each year, which is the rate shown in the year-by-year table. In a high-tax state like California, combined federal and state income tax reaches close to half of a top earner's income, so those years run in the mid-40s percent. A loan-out company, the corporation many actors run their income through, does not lower the tax on the money they take home. Its real advantage is deducting business costs such as agent, manager, and attorney fees, and the model already subtracts those as a separate line before any tax is applied. High-earning performers also fall outside the pass-through business deduction that other company owners can claim, so it buys them no rate cut.
Почему эта цифра отличается от других сайтов с чистым капиталом?
Most sites publish a single number with no way to check it. This estimate is built in the open: every salary, rate, and assumption is on the page, and the страницу методики lists every source.
Насколько точна эта оценка?
Никакая оценка собственного капитала частного лица не является точной; это модель, построенная на основе общедоступных данных. Разница в том, что вы можете увидеть, как все было построено, и проверить каждый шаг. Уровень достоверности в верхней части расчета показывает, какая часть цифры основана на раскрытых цифрах, а на странице отмечается, где цифры основаны на предположениях.
Is Zoe Saldaña rich compared to the average person?
Yes. A net worth of $191.8 Million is far above the median American household, which sits near $193,000 according to Federal Reserve data.
What is Zoe Saldaña's biggest source of wealth?
On this page it is film salaries, the largest line in the calculation at $346.9 Million. The full breakdown, with every other line and its source, is above.
How much does Zoe Saldaña make from endorsements?
The model counts $32.0 Million in career endorsement income for Zoe: 2 named partnerships x the $4.0M annual fee from the median disclosed film deal x a 4-year term, spread across the deal years. It is an estimate, since the individual deal values are not all public, and it sits as its own line in the calculation above.
Исследуйте других актеров
О NetWorth Explained
We originally created NWE because nobody in the public-figure net worth space showed their work. Magazines and sites threw out big numbers while hiding behind vague claims of “proprietary algorithms” или “insider knowledge.” That’s why we started the world’s only publication that transparently showed every assumption, every variable, and every calculation. We’re still the only ones who do it this way. Подробнее о NetWorth Explained.