$347.0 Million
Drew Barrymore 净资产 2026
最近更新 August 3, 2026
As of 2026, Drew Barrymore has an estimated net worth of $347.0 Million, computed film by film and year by year from public records and published rates. Every input, rate, and source behind the number is on this page.
Calculation
- 披露的工资和记录的后端，每个都有一个引用
- 未公开的角色是根据其时代、预算范围和职业阶段的已公开可比角色建模的
- 根据披露的中位数估算后端、背书和生产积分
Fast Facts
| Birthdate | February 22, 1975 |
|---|---|
| Birthplace | Culver City |
| Breakthrough | E.T. the Extra-Terrestrial (1982) |
| Best Known | Charlie's Angels (2000) |
Who Is Drew Barrymore?
Drew Barrymore was born February 22, 1975 in Culver City, best known for Charlie's Angels (2000). The earnings behind Drew's net worth come from film salaries, backend participation, and endorsement deals.
The model tracks Drew's earning years from 1979 to 2026, with the biggest single year in 2020 at about $25.5 Million of gross income. After representation fees, taxes, and living costs, what stays invested compounds at market returns into an estimated $347.0 Million today.
Data
下面的每一行都是根据公共数据和我们网站上发布的费率表计算得出的 方法页。信心： C级。记录的数字仅占该数字的一小部分，因此大部分数据是根据已发布的比率和可比数据建模的（等级从 A（主要记录在案）到 C（主要建模））。
The Calculation
| Line | Amount |
|---|---|
| Revenue | |
| Film pay, modeled lead roles (70 of 98 films) era and budget-band medians of disclosed lead salaries (winsorized, thin cells shrunk toward the era median), blended with this actor's disclosed quote history when available; soft breakthrough blend near the career break year | $340,482,746 |
| Film pay, modeled post-breakthrough supporting roles (27 of 98 films) 12.0% of lead cells: lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio | $56,078,591 |
| Film pay, modeled supporting and early roles (1 of 98 films) 时代中位数的 2.5%：成名前的比率 | $550,981 |
| 后端点，估计 12% of disclosed lead deals included points, at a median 2.6% of box office; expected value on 53 commercially viable undisclosed lead roles; cash spread over 3 years; 27 film(s) used band-specific box-office/budget multiples as a gross proxy | $14,811,854 |
| 预计认可度（2 个品牌合作伙伴） 2 named partnerships x the $4.0M annual fee from the median disclosed film deal x a 4-year term, spread across the deal years | $32,000,000 |
| 残差，估计 SAG residual rates on post-theatrical receipts assumed at half of box office, split by role share and spread over the ten years after each release; 46 film(s) used band-specific box-office proxies | $35,045,071 |
| TV: Lindsay Rule 6 episodes; guest default per credited year; network not identified, priced on the broadcast cell; priced from tv_episode_rates.csv (en.wikipedia.org) | $30,000 |
| The Drew Barrymore Show daytime talk host pay; entered at $5M/yr for 2020-25 seasons as a mid-market host floor | $30,000,000 |
| 储蓄投资回报 mixed portfolio: 55% actual 60/40 securities returns (taxed) + 45% US long-run home-price rate on the rest | $242,073,372 |
| Expenses | |
| 代表费 代理人10%+律师5% | -$75,417,654 |
| Taxes 美国-纽约有效利率，逐年 | -$193,514,320 |
| 个人消费 measured household savings rates by income, times a 88% entertainment-household factor | -$128,946,303 |
| 估计净资产 | $346,979,453 |
电影接电影
| Film | Year | Role | Budget | 票房 | 工资已计算 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Influenced no disclosed fee: modeled on the $23.8M shrunk median for 2020s/large (n=2), capped at $10.5M | 2026 | Lead | $70,000,000 | – | $10,500,000 |
| Outcome no disclosed fee: modeled on the $23.8M shrunk median for 2020s/large (n=2), capped at $10.5M | 2026 | Lead | $70,000,000 | – | $10,500,000 |
| Hollywood Squares no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $23.8M shrunk median for 2020s/large (n=2) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio) | 2025 | Supporting | $70,000,000 | – | $2,850,000 |
| Child Star no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $23.8M shrunk median for 2020s/large (n=2) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio) | 2024 | Supporting | $70,000,000 | – | $2,850,000 |
| Princess Power no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $23.8M shrunk median for 2020s/large (n=2) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio) | 2024 | Supporting | $70,000,000 | – | $2,850,000 |
| Smile 2 no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $21.7M shrunk median for 2020s/mid (n=1) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio) | 2024 | Supporting | $28,000,000 | $138,100,000 | $2,600,000 |
| And Just Like That... no disclosed fee: modeled on the $23.8M shrunk median for 2020s/large (n=2), capped at $10.5M | 2023 | Lead | $70,000,000 | – | $10,500,000 |
| Jackpot no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $23.8M shrunk median for 2020s/large (n=2) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio) | 2023 | Supporting | $70,000,000 | – | $2,850,000 |
| The Eric Andre Show no disclosed fee: modeled on the $23.8M shrunk median for 2020s/large (n=2), capped at $10.5M | 2023 | Lead | $70,000,000 | – | $10,500,000 |
| Ziwe no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $23.8M shrunk median for 2020s/large (n=2) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio) | 2022 | Supporting | $70,000,000 | – | $2,850,000 |
| A Castle for Christmas no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $23.8M shrunk median for 2020s/large (n=2) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio) | 2021 | Supporting | $70,000,000 | – | $2,850,000 |
| Armchair Expert with Dax Shepard no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $23.8M shrunk median for 2020s/large (n=2) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio) | 2021 | Supporting | $70,000,000 | – | $2,850,000 |
| Rebel Homemaker: Food, Family, Life no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $23.8M shrunk median for 2020s/large (n=2) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio) | 2021 | Supporting | $70,000,000 | – | $2,850,000 |
| Beat Bobby Flay no disclosed fee: modeled on the $23.8M shrunk median for 2020s/large (n=2), capped at $10.5M | 2020 | Lead | $70,000,000 | – | $10,500,000 |
| Martha Knows Best no disclosed fee: modeled on the $23.8M shrunk median for 2020s/large (n=2), capped at $10.5M | 2020 | Lead | $70,000,000 | – | $10,500,000 |
| The Drew Barrymore Show no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $23.8M shrunk median for 2020s/large (n=2) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio) | 2020 | Supporting | $70,000,000 | – | $2,850,000 |
| The Stand In no disclosed fee: modeled on the $25.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid), capped at $0.0M | 2020 | Lead | $100,884 | $100,884 | $15,133 |
| Charlie's Angels no disclosed fee: modeled on the $20.0M shrunk median for 2010s/large (n=8), capped at $7.7M | 2019 | Lead | $51,500,000 | $264,100,000 | $7,725,000 |
| The World's Best no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio) | 2019 | Supporting | $40,000,000 | – | $1,320,000 |
| First Dates no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio) | 2017 | Supporting | $40,000,000 | – | $1,320,000 |
| Freak Show no disclosed fee: modeled on the $5.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid), capped at $0.3M | 2017 | Lead | $2,000,000 | $20,657 | $300,000 |
| Odd Mom Out no disclosed fee: modeled on the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3), capped at $6.0M | 2016 | Lead | $40,000,000 | – | $6,000,000 |
| Santa Clarita Diet no disclosed fee: modeled on the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3), capped at $6.0M | 2016 | Lead | $40,000,000 | – | $6,000,000 |
| Miss You Already no disclosed fee: modeled on the $5.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid), capped at $1.2M | 2015 | Lead | $8,199,999 | $8,199,999 | $1,230,000 |
| Wildflower no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio) | 2015 | Supporting | $40,000,000 | – | $1,320,000 |
| Animal no disclosed fee: modeled on the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3), capped at $6.0M | 2014 | Lead | $40,000,000 | – | $6,000,000 |
| Blended no disclosed fee: modeled on the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3), capped at $6.4M | 2014 | Lead | $42,500,000 | $128,000,000 | $6,375,000 |
| Big Miracle no disclosed fee: modeled on the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3), capped at $6.0M | 2012 | Lead | $40,000,000 | $24,700,000 | $6,000,000 |
| Best Coast no disclosed fee: modeled on the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3), capped at $6.0M | 2011 | Lead | $40,000,000 | – | $6,000,000 |
| Charlie's Angels no disclosed fee: modeled on the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3), capped at $6.0M | 2011 | Lead | $40,000,000 | $264,100,000 | $6,000,000 |
| Going the Distance no disclosed fee: modeled on the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3), capped at $4.8M | 2010 | Lead | $32,000,000 | $42,100,000 | $4,800,000 |
| Everybody's Fine no disclosed fee: modeled on the $19.4M shrunk median for 2000s/mid (n=2), capped at $3.1M | 2009 | Lead | $20,500,000 | $16,399,999 | $3,075,000 |
| Grey Gardens no disclosed fee: modeled on the $19.4M shrunk median for 2000s/mid (n=2), capped at $6.0M | 2009 | Lead | $40,000,000 | $36,923 | $6,000,000 |
| He's Just Not That Into You no disclosed fee: modeled on the $19.4M shrunk median for 2000s/mid (n=2), capped at $6.0M | 2009 | Lead | $40,000,000 | $178,000,000 | $6,000,000 |
| List of directorial debuts no disclosed fee: modeled on the $19.4M shrunk median for 2000s/mid (n=2), capped at $6.0M | 2009 | Lead | $40,000,000 | – | $6,000,000 |
| Whip It no disclosed fee: modeled on the $18.8M median for its era and nearest band (mid), capped at $2.2M | 2009 | Lead | $15,000,000 | $16,600,000 | $2,250,000 |
| Beverly Hills Chihuahua no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $18.8M median for its era and nearest band (mid) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio), capped at 15% of budget | 2008 | Supporting | $12,000,000 | $149,281,606 | $1,800,000 |
| Lucky You no disclosed fee: modeled on the $20.0M shrunk median for 2000s/large (n=18), capped at $8.2M | 2007 | Lead | $55,000,000 | $8,400,000 | $8,250,000 |
| Music and Lyrics no disclosed fee: modeled on the $19.4M shrunk median for 2000s/mid (n=2), capped at $6.0M | 2007 | Lead | $40,000,000 | $145,900,000 | $6,000,000 |
| Curious George no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $20.0M shrunk median for 2000s/large (n=18) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio) | 2006 | Supporting | $50,000,000 | $71,100,000 | $2,400,000 |
| Fever Pitch no disclosed fee: modeled on the $19.4M shrunk median for 2000s/mid (n=2), capped at $4.5M | 2005 | Lead | $30,000,000 | $50,600,000 | $4,499,999 |
| Stewie Griffin: The Untold Story no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $19.4M shrunk median for 2000s/mid (n=2) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio) | 2005 | Supporting | $40,000,000 | – | $2,325,000 |
| 50 First Dates no disclosed fee: modeled on the $20.0M shrunk median for 2000s/large (n=18), capped at $11.2M | 2004 | Lead | $75,000,000 | $198,500,000 | $11,249,995 |
| Choose or Lose Presents: The Best Place to Start no disclosed fee: modeled on the $19.4M shrunk median for 2000s/mid (n=2), capped at $6.0M | 2004 | Lead | $40,000,000 | – | $5,999,998 |
| Charlie's Angels no disclosed fee: modeled on the $19.4M shrunk median for 2000s/mid (n=2), capped at $6.0M | 2003 | Lead | $40,000,000 | $264,100,000 | $5,999,995 |
| Charlie's Angels: Full Throttle no disclosed fee: modeled on the $11.8M shrunk median for 2000s/tentpole (n=9) | 2003 | Lead | $120,000,000 | $259,200,000 | $11,818,172 |
| Duplex no disclosed fee: modeled on the $19.4M shrunk median for 2000s/mid (n=2), capped at $6.0M | 2003 | Lead | $40,000,000 | $19,300,000 | $5,999,995 |
| Confessions of a Dangerous Mind no disclosed fee: modeled on the $19.4M shrunk median for 2000s/mid (n=2), capped at $4.5M | 2002 | Lead | $30,000,000 | $33,000,000 | $4,499,993 |
| Donnie Darko no disclosed fee: modeled on the $18.8M median for its era and nearest band (mid), capped at $0.7M | 2001 | Lead | $4,500,000 | $7,500,000 | $674,999 |
| Freddy Got Fingered no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $18.8M median for its era and nearest band (mid) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio), capped at 15% of budget | 2001 | Supporting | $14,000,000 | $14,300,000 | $2,099,995 |
| Riding in Cars with Boys no disclosed fee: modeled on the $19.4M shrunk median for 2000s/mid (n=2), capped at $7.0M | 2001 | Lead | $47,000,000 | $35,700,000 | $7,049,979 |
| Charlie's Angels no disclosed fee: modeled on the $20.0M shrunk median for 2000s/large (n=18), capped at $13.9M | 2000 | Lead | $93,000,000 | $264,100,000 | $13,949,917 |
| Skipped Parts no disclosed fee: modeled on the $19.4M shrunk median for 2000s/mid (n=2), capped at $6.0M | 2000 | Lead | $40,000,000 | – | $5,999,966 |
| Titan A.E. no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $20.0M shrunk median for 2000s/large (n=18) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio) | 2000 | Supporting | $82,500,000 | $36,800,000 | $2,399,988 |
| Family Guy no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $14.4M shrunk median for 1990s/mid (n=6) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio) | 1999 | Supporting | $26,000,000 | – | $1,724,984 |
| Never Been Kissed no disclosed fee: modeled on the $14.4M shrunk median for 1990s/mid (n=6), capped at $3.8M | 1999 | Lead | $25,000,000 | $84,600,000 | $3,749,959 |
| Olive, the Other Reindeer no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $14.4M shrunk median for 1990s/mid (n=6) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio) | 1999 | Supporting | $26,000,000 | – | $1,724,984 |
| Swirl 360 no disclosed fee: modeled on the $14.4M shrunk median for 1990s/mid (n=6), capped at $3.9M | 1999 | Lead | $26,000,000 | – | $3,899,958 |
| The Simpsons no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $14.6M shrunk median for 1990s/large (n=3) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio) | 1999 | Supporting | $75,000,000 | $536,400,000 | $1,751,983 |
| Ever After no disclosed fee: modeled on the $14.4M shrunk median for 1990s/mid (n=6), capped at $3.8M | 1998 | Lead | $25,500,000 | $98,000,000 | $3,824,919 |
| Home Fries no disclosed fee: modeled on the $10.0M shrunk median for 1990s/small (n=1), capped at $2.2M | 1998 | Lead | $15,000,000 | $10,400,000 | $2,249,953 |
| The Larry Sanders Show no disclosed fee: modeled on the $14.4M shrunk median for 1990s/mid (n=6), capped at $3.9M | 1998 | Lead | $26,000,000 | – | $3,899,917 |
| The Wedding Singer no disclosed fee: modeled on the $10.0M shrunk median for 1990s/small (n=1), capped at $2.7M | 1998 | Lead | $18,000,000 | $123,300,000 | $2,699,943 |
| Best Men no disclosed fee: modeled on the $10.0M shrunk median for 1990s/small (n=1), capped at $2.1M | 1997 | Lead | $14,000,000 | $5,000 | $2,099,916 |
| Wishful Thinking no disclosed fee: modeled on the $14.4M shrunk median for 1990s/mid (n=6), capped at $3.9M | 1997 | Lead | $26,000,000 | – | $3,899,839 |
| Bill Nye the Science Guy no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $14.4M shrunk median for 1990s/mid (n=6) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio) | 1996 | Supporting | $26,000,000 | – | $1,724,879 |
| Everyone Says I Love You no disclosed fee: modeled on the $14.4M shrunk median for 1990s/mid (n=6), capped at $3.0M | 1996 | Lead | $20,000,000 | $9,800,000 | $2,999,767 |
| Scream no disclosed fee: modeled on the $14.4M shrunk median for 1990s/mid (n=6), capped at $3.6M | 1996 | Lead | $24,000,000 | $140,041,405 | $3,599,713 |
| Batman Forever no disclosed fee: modeled on the $12.8M shrunk median for 1990s/tentpole (n=1) | 1995 | Lead | $100,000,000 | $336,567,158 | $12,831,179 |
| Boys on the Side no disclosed fee: modeled on the $14.4M shrunk median for 1990s/mid (n=6), capped at $3.1M | 1995 | Lead | $21,000,000 | $47,400,000 | $3,149,519 |
| Mad Love no disclosed fee: modeled on the $14.4M shrunk median for 1990s/mid (n=6), capped at $3.9M | 1995 | Lead | $26,000,000 | $15,453,274 | $3,899,390 |
| You Got It no disclosed fee: modeled on the $14.4M shrunk median for 1990s/mid (n=6), capped at $3.9M | 1995 | Lead | $26,000,000 | – | $3,899,390 |
| Bad Girls no disclosed fee: modeled on the $14.4M shrunk median for 1990s/mid (n=6), capped at $4.5M | 1994 | Lead | $30,000,000 | $23,000,000 | $4,498,611 |
| Inside the Goldmine no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $14.4M shrunk median for 1990s/mid (n=6) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio) | 1994 | Supporting | $26,000,000 | – | $1,724,542 |
| Doppelganger no disclosed fee: modeled on the $2.0M median for its era and nearest band (small), capped at $0.5M | 1993 | Lead | $3,000,000 | – | $449,739 |
| No Place to Hide no disclosed fee: modeled on the $14.4M shrunk median for 1990s/mid (n=6), capped at $3.9M | 1993 | Lead | $26,000,000 | $135,004 | $3,897,688 |
| The Amy Fisher Story no disclosed fee: modeled on the $14.4M shrunk median for 1990s/mid (n=6), capped at $3.9M | 1993 | Lead | $26,000,000 | – | $3,897,688 |
| Wayne's World 2 no disclosed fee: modeled on the $14.4M shrunk median for 1990s/mid (n=6), capped at $6.0M | 1993 | Lead | $40,000,000 | $48,197,805 | $5,996,317 |
| 2000 Malibu Road no disclosed fee: modeled on the $14.4M shrunk median for 1990s/mid (n=6), capped at $3.9M | 1992 | Lead | $26,000,000 | – | $3,895,500 |
| Guncrazy no disclosed fee: modeled on the $14.4M shrunk median for 1990s/mid (n=6), capped at $3.9M | 1992 | Lead | $26,000,000 | $114,516 | $3,895,500 |
| Poison Ivy no disclosed fee: modeled on the $2.0M median for its era and nearest band (small), capped at $0.5M | 1992 | Lead | $3,000,000 | $1,800,000 | $449,492 |
| Sketch Artist no disclosed fee: modeled on the $14.4M shrunk median for 1990s/mid (n=6), capped at $3.9M | 1992 | Lead | $26,000,000 | – | $3,895,500 |
| Waxwork II: Lost in Time no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $14.4M shrunk median for 1990s/mid (n=6) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio) | 1992 | Supporting | $26,000,000 | – | $1,723,264 |
| Motorama no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $14.4M shrunk median for 1990s/mid (n=6) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio) | 1991 | Supporting | $26,000,000 | $10,535 | $1,721,623 |
| CBS Schoolbreak Special no disclosed fee: modeled on the $4.1M shrunk median for pre1990/small (n=2), capped at $2.1M | 1989 | Lead | $14,000,000 | – | $2,081,397 |
| Far from Home no disclosed fee: modeled on the $4.1M shrunk median for pre1990/small (n=2), capped at $2.1M | 1989 | Lead | $14,000,000 | $11,859 | $2,081,397 |
| See You in the Morning no disclosed fee: modeled on the $4.1M shrunk median for pre1990/small (n=2), capped at $2.1M | 1989 | Lead | $14,000,000 | $4,795,009 | $2,081,397 |
| Conspiracy of Love no disclosed fee: modeled on the $4.1M shrunk median for pre1990/small (n=2), capped at $2.1M | 1987 | Lead | $14,000,000 | – | $2,031,217 |
| Babes in Toyland no disclosed fee: modeled on the $4.1M shrunk median for pre1990/small (n=2), capped at $0.8M | 1986 | Lead | $5,000,000 | – | $707,973 |
| Rock 'n' Roll to the Rescue no disclosed fee: modeled on the $4.1M shrunk median for pre1990/small (n=2), capped at $2.1M | 1986 | Lead | $14,000,000 | – | $1,970,265 |
| The Ray Bradbury Theatre no disclosed fee: modeled on the $4.1M shrunk median for pre1990/small (n=2), capped at $2.1M | 1986 | Lead | $14,000,000 | – | $1,970,265 |
| ABC Weekend Specials no disclosed fee: modeled on the $4.1M shrunk median for pre1990/small (n=2), capped at $2.1M | 1985 | Lead | $14,000,000 | – | $1,861,967 |
| Cat's Eye no disclosed fee: modeled on the $4.1M shrunk median for pre1990/small (n=2), capped at $1.1M | 1985 | Lead | $7,000,000 | $13,100,000 | $937,130 |
| Star Fairies no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $4.1M shrunk median for pre1990/small (n=2) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio) | 1985 | Supporting | $14,000,000 | – | $448,287 |
| Firestarter soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.79): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $4.1M shrunk median for pre1990/small (n=2), capped at $1.8M vs early terms | 1984 | Lead | $12,000,000 | $18,900,000 | $1,446,017 |
| Irreconcilable Differences soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.79): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $4.1M shrunk median for pre1990/small (n=2), capped at $1.2M vs early terms | 1984 | Lead | $8,000,000 | $12,000,000 | $971,183 |
| E.T. the Extra-Terrestrial soft-breakthrough supporting blend (w=0.50) | 1982 | Supporting | $10,500,000 | $797,300,000 | $299,062 |
| Altered States soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.21): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $4.1M shrunk median for pre1990/small (n=2), capped at $2.2M vs early terms | 1980 | Lead | $15,000,000 | $19,900,000 | $550,981 |
建模人物如何工作。 An undisclosed lead role after the breakthrough gets the median of disclosed lead salaries for its era and budget band, capped at 15% of the film’s budget. Supporting and pre-breakthrough roles get 2.5% of that median, the documented going rate for actors before stardom. Films with no reported budget are treated as small productions. Undocumented backend, endorsements, and producer or director credits enter as separate estimated lines in the calculation above, built from disclosed medians. Every median comes from the published tables on our 方法页.
净资产 Over Time
每年年底的余额模型，与下表相匹配。
逐年
| Year | Income | 代表费 | 税率 | Spent | Saved | Balance |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | $15,830,737 | $2,374,611 | 45% | $4,079,359 | $3,321,510 | $346,979,453 |
| 2025 | $14,419,230 | $2,162,885 | 45% | $3,715,634 | $3,025,356 | $336,836,994 |
| 2024 | $12,844,004 | $1,926,601 | 45% | $3,309,720 | $2,694,852 | $311,147,353 |
| 2023 | $25,165,683 | $3,774,852 | 45% | $6,484,844 | $5,280,113 | $285,613,820 |
| 2022 | $15,124,017 | $2,268,603 | 45% | $3,897,248 | $3,173,231 | $257,302,202 |
| 2021 | $13,217,729 | $1,982,659 | 45% | $3,406,024 | $2,773,265 | $272,710,072 |
| 2020 | $25,474,948 | $3,821,242 | 45% | $6,564,537 | $5,345,001 | $248,973,603 |
| 2019 | $14,391,183 | $2,158,677 | 45% | $3,708,406 | $3,019,472 | $226,778,084 |
| 2018 | $3,508,187 | $526,228 | 45% | $904,011 | $736,067 | $202,237,874 |
| 2017 | $2,018,639 | $302,796 | 47% | $501,260 | $408,137 | $200,331,869 |
| 2016 | $9,899,897 | $1,484,985 | 47% | $2,458,299 | $2,001,605 | $185,783,127 |
| 2015 | $6,281,386 | $942,208 | 47% | $1,559,766 | $1,269,998 | $174,701,583 |
| 2014 | $10,357,391 | $1,553,609 | 47% | $2,571,902 | $2,094,103 | $169,318,417 |
| 2013 | $5,103,655 | $765,548 | 47% | $1,267,317 | $1,031,879 | $157,601,185 |
| 2012 | $5,639,069 | $845,860 | 43% | $1,505,950 | $1,226,180 | $143,381,702 |
| 2011 | $11,738,441 | $1,760,766 | 43% | $3,134,826 | $2,552,449 | $133,256,644 |
| 2010 | $8,336,121 | $1,250,418 | 43% | $2,226,214 | $1,812,636 | $125,870,758 |
| 2009 | $19,250,293 | $2,887,544 | 43% | $5,140,914 | $4,185,853 | $116,125,991 |
| 2008 | $9,613,371 | $1,442,006 | 43% | $2,567,312 | $2,090,366 | $102,178,863 |
| 2007 | $11,857,863 | $1,778,679 | 43% | $3,166,718 | $2,578,416 | $110,023,631 |
| 2006 | $7,508,224 | $1,126,234 | 43% | $2,005,119 | $1,632,615 | $102,785,929 |
| 2005 | $7,809,135 | $1,171,370 | 43% | $2,085,479 | $1,698,046 | $94,846,829 |
| 2004 | $16,276,946 | $2,441,542 | 43% | $4,346,862 | $3,539,318 | $89,875,516 |
| 2003 | $23,471,020 | $3,520,653 | 43% | $6,268,086 | $5,103,623 | $81,887,846 |
| 2002 | $11,767,492 | $1,765,124 | 46% | $2,977,185 | $2,424,094 | $69,930,588 |
| 2001 | $9,770,869 | $1,465,630 | 46% | $2,472,038 | $2,012,791 | $69,603,652 |
| 2000 | $20,226,777 | $3,034,017 | 46% | $5,117,391 | $4,166,700 | $67,619,938 |
| 1999 | $16,855,852 | $2,528,378 | 46% | $4,264,544 | $3,472,292 | $62,466,578 |
| 1998 | $13,728,076 | $2,059,211 | 46% | $3,473,214 | $2,827,973 | $55,084,010 |
| 1997 | $9,151,083 | $1,372,662 | 46% | $2,315,231 | $1,885,116 | $47,277,375 |
| 1996 | $8,656,353 | $1,298,453 | 46% | $2,190,064 | $1,783,202 | $40,573,905 |
| 1995 | $19,883,455 | $2,982,518 | 46% | $5,030,530 | $4,095,976 | $35,954,421 |
| 1994 | $11,883,058 | $1,782,459 | 46% | $3,006,423 | $2,447,900 | $28,056,285 |
| 1993 | $12,171,433 | $1,825,715 | 46% | $3,079,382 | $2,507,305 | $25,151,631 |
| 1992 | $14,263,829 | $2,139,574 | 36% | $4,277,049 | $3,482,474 | $21,391,682 |
| 1991 | $5,576,461 | $836,469 | 36% | $1,672,117 | $1,361,477 | $17,068,735 |
| 1990 | $741,856 | $111,278 | 36% | $222,448 | $181,122 | $14,083,842 |
| 1989 | $4,600,299 | $690,045 | 36% | $1,379,412 | $1,123,150 | $13,538,902 |
| 1988 | $2,124,853 | $318,728 | 36% | $637,143 | $518,777 | $11,126,767 |
| 1987 | $1,693,674 | $254,051 | 45% | $436,436 | $355,357 | $9,906,954 |
| 1986 | $4,127,843 | $619,176 | 55% | $870,290 | $708,610 | $9,214,241 |
| 1985 | $11,874,011 | $1,781,102 | 55% | $2,503,445 | $2,038,364 | $7,825,634 |
| 1984 | $10,824,436 | $1,623,665 | 55% | $2,282,159 | $1,858,188 | $5,132,433 |
| 1983 | $8,851,792 | $1,327,769 | 54% | $1,907,731 | $1,553,320 | $3,094,583 |
| 1982 | $8,221,164 | $1,233,175 | 54% | $1,771,819 | $1,442,656 | $1,510,672 |
| 1981 | $101,539 | $15,231 | 55% | $35,079 | $3,760 | $66,666 |
| 1980 | $385,687 | $57,853 | 55% | $99,491 | $48,034 | $61,658 |
| 1979 | $165,294 | $24,794 | 55% | $49,872 | $13,353 | $13,353 |
Model Notes
- 住宅代理：该批次住宅并非单独采购；美国-加拿大默认适用直至记录
- salary comps: 2 disclosed lead fee(s) flagged as non-market outliers (scale / far-below-quote) and excluded from era medians
- 图片来源： Wikimedia Commons via Wikipedia (Drew Barrymore)
重现这个数字。 净值估计应该像科学发现一样是可重复的：相同的公众投入和相同的公布率应该总是给出相同的答案。电影预算和票房是公开报告的。每一份披露的工资、费率、税率、储蓄率和基准回报率都会在我们的网站上发布并引用 方法页. Undisclosed lead roles use the median of disclosed salaries for their era and budget band, capped at 15% of the film’s budget. Supporting and early-career roles use the documented pre-stardom fraction of that median. Undocumented backend, endorsements, and hyphenate credits enter as estimated lines from disclosed medians. Apply the rates year by year as shown above and you will land on $347.0 Million.
方法论
We rebuild Drew’s career as a yearly time series. Disclosed salaries and documented backend enter as reported, with citations. Undisclosed lead roles get the median of disclosed salaries for their era and budget band, capped at 15% of the film’s budget. Supporting roles and roles from before the breakthrough get 2.5% of that median, the going-rate ratio measured from disclosed pre-stardom deals. Films with no reported budget are treated as small productions, and every role is estimated unless a source documents it was unpaid. Representation fees come out at sourced rates, taxes follow the eras actually lived through, spending follows measured household savings behavior unless court documents say otherwise, and what remains compounds at real market returns. Undocumented backend enters as an expected value from disclosed deals, endorsements at the median disclosed ambassador fee, and producer or director credits at union-scale floors.
完整的模型、每个费率表以及我们的估算如何与实际交易进行核对的信息均位于 方法页.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is Drew Barrymore's net worth in 2026?
As of 2026, Drew Barrymore's net worth is an estimated $347.0 Million. The estimate is built film by film from disclosed salaries and documented backend, then year by year: income, minus representation fees and taxes, minus spending, compounded at real market returns.
How does Drew Barrymore make money?
电影工资和记录的后端参与。
How is Drew Barrymore's net worth calculated?
Disclosed paydays enter as reported, with citations. Undisclosed lead roles use the median of disclosed salaries for their era and budget band, capped at 15% of the film's budget, and supporting or early-career roles use the documented pre-stardom fraction of that median. We subtract sourced representation fees, taxes for the years Drew actually worked, and spending from measured savings behavior, then compound at real market returns. Undocumented backend, endorsements, and producing credits enter as estimated lines from disclosed medians. Every rate and source is published.
How much does Drew Barrymore make per film?
它因角色和时代而异，上面的逐部电影表格列出了每部电影的片酬。披露的发薪日按报告输入。未公开的角色是根据同等演员在同一时代和预算范围内的收入来建模的，突破后的主角收入最高，配角或早期角色只占其中的一小部分。
为什么税率那么高，演员不跟外贷公司避税吗？
Tax comes out at the effective rate for where Drew lived each year, which is the rate shown in the year-by-year table. In a high-tax state like California, combined federal and state income tax reaches close to half of a top earner's income, so those years run in the mid-40s percent. A loan-out company, the corporation many actors run their income through, does not lower the tax on the money they take home. Its real advantage is deducting business costs such as agent, manager, and attorney fees, and the model already subtracts those as a separate line before any tax is applied. High-earning performers also fall outside the pass-through business deduction that other company owners can claim, so it buys them no rate cut.
为什么这个数字与其他净值网站不同？
Most sites publish a single number with no way to check it. This estimate is built in the open: every salary, rate, and assumption is on the page, and the 方法页 lists every source.
这个估计有多准确？
对于个人的净资产没有准确的估计；这是根据公共数据构建的模型。不同之处在于您可以看到它是如何构建的并检查每一步。计算顶部附近的置信度显示了该数字有多少是基于披露的数字，以及数字依赖于假设的页面标记。
Is Drew Barrymore rich compared to the average person?
Yes. A net worth of $347.0 Million is far above the median American household, which sits near $193,000 according to Federal Reserve data.
What is Drew Barrymore's biggest source of wealth?
On this page it is film salaries, the largest line in the calculation at $340.5 Million. The full breakdown, with every other line and its source, is above.
How much does Drew Barrymore make from endorsements?
The model counts $32.0 Million in career endorsement income for Drew: 2 named partnerships x the $4.0M annual fee from the median disclosed film deal x a 4-year term, spread across the deal years. It is an estimate, since the individual deal values are not all public, and it sits as its own line in the calculation above.
探索其他演员
Drew Barrymore
Angelina Jolie
Bruce Willis
Christian Bale
Emma Watson
Hugh Jackman
Jason Statham
Jennifer Aniston
Jennifer Garner
Jodie Foster
Johnny Depp
Julia Roberts
Leonardo DiCaprio
Margot Robbie
Matt Damon
Mila Kunis
Morgan Freeman
Natalie Portman
Samuel L. Jackson
Sandra Bullock
Scarlett Johansson
Sylvester Stallone
Tom Hanks
关于NetWorth Explained
We originally created NWE because nobody in the public-figure net worth space showed their work. Magazines and sites threw out big numbers while hiding behind vague claims of “proprietary algorithms” 或者 “insider knowledge.” That’s why we started the world’s only publication that transparently showed every assumption, every variable, and every calculation. We’re still the only ones who do it this way. 了解更多关于NetWorth Explained的信息.