Edward Norton 净资产 2026
最近更新 August 3, 2026
As of 2026, Edward Norton has an estimated net worth of $133.6 Million, computed film by film and year by year from public records and published rates. Every input, rate, and source behind the number is on this page.
Calculation
- 披露的工资和记录的后端，每个都有一个引用
- 未公开的角色是根据其时代、预算范围和职业阶段的已公开可比角色建模的
- 根据披露的中位数估算后端、背书和生产积分
Fast Facts
| Birthdate | August 18, 1969 |
|---|---|
| Birthplace | Boston |
| Breakthrough | Primal Fear (1996) |
| Best Known | Fight Club (1999) |
Who Is Edward Norton?
Edward Norton was born August 18, 1969 in Boston, best known for Fight Club (1999). The earnings behind Edward's net worth come from film salaries, backend participation, and endorsement deals.
The model tracks Edward's earning years from 1995 to 2026, with the biggest single year in 2012 at about $18.7 Million of gross income. After representation fees, taxes, and living costs, what stays invested compounds at market returns into an estimated $133.6 Million today.
Data
下面的每一行都是根据公共数据和我们网站上发布的费率表计算得出的 方法页。信心： C级。记录的数字仅占该数字的一小部分，因此大部分数据是根据已发布的比率和可比数据建模的（等级从 A（主要记录在案）到 C（主要建模））。
The Calculation
| Line | Amount |
|---|---|
| Revenue | |
| Film pay, modeled lead roles (36 of 59 films) era and budget-band medians of disclosed lead salaries (winsorized, thin cells shrunk toward the era median), blended with this actor's disclosed quote history when available; soft breakthrough blend near the career break year | $190,496,850 |
| Film pay, modeled post-breakthrough supporting roles (23 of 59 films) 12.0% of lead cells: lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio | $40,279,668 |
| 后端点，估计 12% of disclosed lead deals included points, at a median 2.6% of box office; expected value on 27 commercially viable undisclosed lead roles; cash spread over 3 years; 6 film(s) used band-specific box-office/budget multiples as a gross proxy | $7,626,697 |
| 预计认可度（1 个品牌合作伙伴） 1 named partnerships x the $4.0M annual fee from the median disclosed film deal x a 4-year term, spread across the deal years | $16,000,000 |
| 残差，估计 SAG residual rates on post-theatrical receipts assumed at half of box office, split by role share and spread over the ten years after each release; 14 film(s) used band-specific box-office proxies | $19,280,750 |
| 储蓄投资回报 mixed portfolio: 55% actual 60/40 securities returns (taxed) + 45% US long-run home-price rate on the rest | $76,602,767 |
| Expenses | |
| 代表费 代理人10%+律师5% | -$40,589,907 |
| Taxes 美国-纽约有效利率，逐年 | -$103,013,742 |
| 个人消费 measured household savings rates by income, times a 88% entertainment-household factor | -$70,000,048 |
| 估计净资产 | $133,598,452 |
电影接电影
| Film | Year | Role | Budget | 票房 | 工资已计算 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| The Invite no disclosed fee: modeled on the $23.8M shrunk median for 2020s/large (n=2), capped at $10.5M | 2026 | Lead | $70,000,000 | $32,900,000 | $10,500,000 |
| The American Revolution no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $23.8M shrunk median for 2020s/large (n=2) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio) | 2025 | Supporting | $70,000,000 | – | $2,850,000 |
| The Tiger no disclosed fee: modeled on the $23.8M shrunk median for 2020s/large (n=2), capped at $10.5M | 2025 | Lead | $70,000,000 | – | $10,500,000 |
| A Complete Unknown no disclosed fee: modeled on the $23.8M shrunk median for 2020s/large (n=2), capped at $9.8M | 2024 | Lead | $65,000,000 | $140,500,000 | $9,750,000 |
| Sausage Party: Foodtopia no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $23.8M shrunk median for 2020s/large (n=2) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio) | 2024 | Supporting | $70,000,000 | – | $2,850,000 |
| Asteroid City no disclosed fee: modeled on the $21.7M shrunk median for 2020s/mid (n=1), capped at $3.8M | 2023 | Lead | $25,000,000 | $53,857,743 | $3,750,000 |
| Extrapolations no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $23.8M shrunk median for 2020s/large (n=2) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio) | 2023 | Supporting | $70,000,000 | – | $2,850,000 |
| Carl Foreman no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $25.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio), capped at 15% of budget | 2022 | Supporting | $6,000,000 | $28,900,000 | $900,000 |
| Glass Onion: A Knives Out Mystery no disclosed fee: modeled on the $21.7M shrunk median for 2020s/mid (n=1), capped at $6.0M | 2022 | Lead | $40,000,000 | $15,000,000 | $6,000,000 |
| The French Dispatch no disclosed fee: modeled on the $21.7M shrunk median for 2020s/mid (n=1), capped at $3.8M | 2021 | Lead | $25,000,000 | $46,333,545 | $3,750,000 |
| Alita: Battle Angel no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $20.0M shrunk median for 2010s/tentpole (n=12) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio) | 2019 | Supporting | $170,000,000 | $405,000,000 | $2,400,000 |
| Motherless Brooklyn no disclosed fee: modeled on the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3), capped at $3.9M | 2019 | Lead | $26,000,000 | $18,600,000 | $3,899,999 |
| Ask the StoryBots no disclosed fee: modeled on the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3), capped at $6.0M | 2018 | Lead | $40,000,000 | – | $5,999,998 |
| Gotti no disclosed fee: modeled on the $5.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid), capped at $1.5M | 2018 | Lead | $10,000,000 | $6,400,000 | $1,499,999 |
| Isle of Dogs no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio) | 2018 | Supporting | $35,000,000 | $64,337,744 | $1,320,000 |
| The Guardian Brothers no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $5.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio) | 2017 | Supporting | $12,000,000 | $11,900,000 | $600,000 |
| Collateral Beauty no disclosed fee: modeled on the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3), capped at $5.4M | 2016 | Lead | $36,000,000 | $88,500,000 | $5,399,992 |
| Sausage Party no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $5.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio) | 2016 | Supporting | $19,000,000 | $140,705,322 | $599,999 |
| 约翰·奥利弗上周今晚 no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio) | 2015 | Supporting | $40,000,000 | – | $1,319,997 |
| Birdman or (The Unexpected Virtue of Ignorance) no disclosed fee: modeled on the $5.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid), capped at $2.7M | 2014 | Lead | $18,000,000 | $103,215,094 | $2,699,984 |
| My Own Man no disclosed fee: modeled on the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3), capped at $6.0M | 2014 | Lead | $40,000,000 | – | $5,999,965 |
| The Grand Budapest Hotel no disclosed fee: modeled on the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3), capped at $3.8M | 2014 | Lead | $25,000,000 | $174,801,324 | $3,749,979 |
| Salinger no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio) | 2013 | Supporting | $40,000,000 | $650,675 | $1,319,987 |
| Spring Break Anthem no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio) | 2013 | Supporting | $40,000,000 | – | $1,319,987 |
| Moonrise Kingdom no disclosed fee: modeled on the $5.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid), capped at $2.4M | 2012 | Lead | $16,000,000 | $68,264,022 | $2,399,947 |
| Thanks for Sharing no disclosed fee: modeled on the $5.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid), capped at $0.5M | 2012 | Lead | $3,500,000 | $3,500,000 | $524,991 |
| The Bourne Legacy no disclosed fee: modeled on the $20.0M shrunk median for 2010s/tentpole (n=12), capped at $18.8M | 2012 | Lead | $125,000,000 | $276,144,750 | $18,749,575 |
| The Dictator no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $20.0M shrunk median for 2010s/large (n=8) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio) | 2012 | Supporting | $65,000,000 | $179,379,533 | $2,399,956 |
| Leaves of Grass no disclosed fee: modeled on the $5.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid), capped at $1.4M | 2010 | Lead | $9,000,000 | $1,018,000 | $1,349,892 |
| Stone no disclosed fee: modeled on the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3), capped at $3.3M | 2010 | Lead | $22,000,000 | $10,300,000 | $3,299,733 |
| By the People: The Election of Barack Obama no disclosed fee: modeled on the $19.4M shrunk median for 2000s/mid (n=2), capped at $6.0M | 2009 | Lead | $40,000,000 | – | $5,999,050 |
| The Invention of Lying no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $18.8M median for its era and nearest band (mid) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio) | 2009 | Supporting | $18,500,000 | $32,406,507 | $2,249,693 |
| Bustin' Down the Door no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $19.4M shrunk median for 2000s/mid (n=2) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio) | 2008 | Supporting | $40,000,000 | – | $2,324,383 |
| Pride and Glory no disclosed fee: modeled on the $19.4M shrunk median for 2000s/mid (n=2), capped at $4.5M | 2008 | Lead | $30,000,000 | $31,200,000 | $4,498,653 |
| The Incredible Hulk no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $11.8M shrunk median for 2000s/tentpole (n=9) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio) | 2008 | Supporting | $150,000,000 | $263,427,551 | $1,417,805 |
| Documentary Film no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $19.4M shrunk median for 2000s/mid (n=2) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio) | 2007 | Supporting | $40,000,000 | – | $2,323,798 |
| Man from Plains no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $18.8M median for its era and nearest band (mid) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio), capped at 15% of budget | 2007 | Supporting | $108,807 | $108,807 | $16,321 |
| The Simpsons Movie no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $20.0M shrunk median for 2000s/large (n=18) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio) | 2007 | Supporting | $75,000,000 | $527,071,022 | $2,398,759 |
| The Illusionist no disclosed fee: modeled on the $18.8M median for its era and nearest band (mid), capped at $2.5M | 2006 | Lead | $17,000,000 | $87,892,388 | $2,547,355 |
| The Painted Veil no disclosed fee: modeled on the $18.8M median for its era and nearest band (mid), capped at $2.9M | 2006 | Lead | $19,400,000 | $26,900,000 | $2,906,897 |
| Down in the Valley no disclosed fee: modeled on the $18.8M median for its era and nearest band (mid), capped at $1.2M | 2005 | Lead | $8,000,000 | $568,932 | $1,198,192 |
| Kingdom of Heaven no disclosed fee: modeled on the $11.8M shrunk median for 2000s/tentpole (n=9) | 2005 | Lead | $135,000,000 | $164,000,000 | $11,789,690 |
| Stella no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $19.4M shrunk median for 2000s/mid (n=2) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio) | 2005 | Supporting | $40,000,000 | – | $2,320,449 |
| After the Sunset no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $20.0M shrunk median for 2000s/large (n=18) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio) | 2004 | Supporting | $58,500,000 | $62,700,000 | $2,390,871 |
| Dirty Work no disclosed fee: modeled on the $19.4M shrunk median for 2000s/mid (n=2), capped at $6.0M | 2004 | Lead | $40,000,000 | – | $5,973,499 |
| The Italian Job no disclosed fee: modeled on the $20.0M shrunk median for 2000s/large (n=18), capped at $9.0M | 2003 | Lead | $60,000,000 | $176,070,171 | $8,920,814 |
| 25th Hour no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $18.8M median for its era and nearest band (mid) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio), capped at 15% of budget | 2002 | Supporting | $5,000,000 | $23,900,000 | $744,941 |
| Death to Smoochy no disclosed fee: modeled on the $20.0M shrunk median for 2000s/large (n=18), capped at $7.5M | 2002 | Lead | $50,000,000 | $8,300,000 | $7,374,097 |
| Frida no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $18.8M median for its era and nearest band (mid) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio), capped at 15% of budget | 2002 | Supporting | $12,000,000 | $56,300,000 | $1,776,056 |
| Red Dragon no disclosed fee: modeled on the $20.0M shrunk median for 2000s/large (n=18), capped at $11.7M | 2002 | Lead | $78,000,000 | $209,196,298 | $11,498,554 |
| The Score no disclosed fee: modeled on the $20.0M shrunk median for 2000s/large (n=18), capped at $10.2M | 2001 | Lead | $68,000,000 | $113,500,000 | $9,865,882 |
| Keeping the Faith no disclosed fee: modeled on the $19.4M shrunk median for 2000s/mid (n=2), capped at $4.3M | 2000 | Lead | $29,000,000 | $59,900,000 | $4,098,854 |
| Fight Club no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $14.6M shrunk median for 1990s/large (n=3) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio) | 1999 | Supporting | $63,000,000 | $101,209,702 | $1,586,666 |
| American History X soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.79): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $14.4M shrunk median for 1990s/mid (n=6), capped at $3.0M vs early terms | 1998 | Lead | $20,000,000 | $23,800,000 | $2,449,143 |
| Out of the Past soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.79): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $14.4M shrunk median for 1990s/mid (n=6), capped at $3.9M vs early terms | 1998 | Lead | $26,000,000 | – | $3,161,395 |
| Rounders soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.79): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $10.0M shrunk median for 1990s/small (n=1), capped at $1.8M vs early terms | 1998 | Lead | $12,000,000 | $22,900,000 | $1,476,657 |
| Everyone Says I Love You soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.50): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $14.4M shrunk median for 1990s/mid (n=6), capped at $3.0M vs early terms | 1996 | Lead | $20,000,000 | $9,800,000 | $1,679,688 |
| Primal Fear soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.50): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $14.4M shrunk median for 1990s/mid (n=6), capped at $4.5M vs early terms | 1996 | Lead | $30,000,000 | $102,616,183 | $2,429,688 |
| The People vs. Larry Flynt soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.50): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $14.4M shrunk median for 1990s/mid (n=6), capped at $5.2M vs early terms | 1996 | Lead | $35,000,000 | $43,000,000 | $2,804,688 |
建模人物如何工作。 An undisclosed lead role after the breakthrough gets the median of disclosed lead salaries for its era and budget band, capped at 15% of the film’s budget. Supporting and pre-breakthrough roles get 2.5% of that median, the documented going rate for actors before stardom. Films with no reported budget are treated as small productions. Undocumented backend, endorsements, and producer or director credits enter as separate estimated lines in the calculation above, built from disclosed medians. Every median comes from the published tables on our 方法页.
净资产 Over Time
每年年底的余额模型，与下表相匹配。
逐年
| Year | Income | 代表费 | 税率 | Spent | Saved | Balance |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | $8,152,760 | $1,222,914 | 45% | $2,100,852 | $1,710,563 | $133,598,452 |
| 2025 | $13,252,932 | $1,987,940 | 45% | $3,415,095 | $2,780,651 | $129,270,168 |
| 2024 | $13,532,667 | $2,029,900 | 45% | $3,487,179 | $2,839,343 | $117,901,457 |
| 2023 | $8,968,247 | $1,345,237 | 45% | $2,310,992 | $1,881,664 | $106,542,596 |
| 2022 | $7,542,675 | $1,131,401 | 45% | $1,943,642 | $1,582,559 | $96,062,255 |
| 2021 | $5,400,152 | $810,023 | 45% | $1,391,544 | $1,133,028 | $101,387,751 |
| 2020 | $1,860,916 | $279,137 | 45% | $479,532 | $390,446 | $92,468,974 |
| 2019 | $5,122,723 | $768,408 | 45% | $1,320,054 | $1,074,819 | $85,709,937 |
| 2018 | $8,879,034 | $1,331,855 | 45% | $2,288,003 | $1,862,946 | $76,495,050 |
| 2017 | $3,893,950 | $584,093 | 47% | $966,929 | $787,296 | $74,198,784 |
| 2016 | $5,558,506 | $833,776 | 47% | $1,380,264 | $1,123,843 | $68,219,094 |
| 2015 | $3,909,903 | $586,485 | 47% | $970,890 | $790,521 | $63,780,332 |
| 2014 | $10,495,961 | $1,574,394 | 47% | $2,606,311 | $2,122,120 | $61,495,921 |
| 2013 | $6,707,197 | $1,006,080 | 47% | $1,665,502 | $1,356,091 | $55,957,063 |
| 2012 | $18,676,610 | $2,801,491 | 43% | $4,987,708 | $4,061,109 | $50,002,012 |
| 2011 | $8,038,379 | $1,205,757 | 43% | $2,146,701 | $1,747,894 | $43,065,021 |
| 2010 | $4,131,489 | $619,723 | 43% | $1,103,341 | $898,366 | $39,789,220 |
| 2009 | $8,014,159 | $1,202,124 | 43% | $2,140,232 | $1,742,628 | $36,404,219 |
| 2008 | $9,122,410 | $1,368,362 | 43% | $2,436,198 | $1,983,610 | $31,639,071 |
| 2007 | $6,718,279 | $1,007,742 | 43% | $1,794,159 | $1,460,847 | $32,599,166 |
| 2006 | $6,263,930 | $939,590 | 43% | $1,672,823 | $1,362,052 | $29,788,028 |
| 2005 | $13,331,146 | $1,999,672 | 43% | $3,560,168 | $2,898,772 | $26,653,736 |
| 2004 | $11,422,205 | $1,713,331 | 43% | $3,050,373 | $2,483,685 | $22,920,210 |
| 2003 | $9,668,479 | $1,450,272 | 43% | $2,582,029 | $2,102,349 | $19,383,561 |
| 2002 | $18,307,044 | $2,746,057 | 46% | $4,631,697 | $3,771,236 | $15,738,719 |
| 2001 | $13,698,447 | $2,054,767 | 46% | $3,465,718 | $2,821,869 | $12,339,265 |
| 2000 | $6,145,790 | $921,868 | 46% | $1,554,890 | $1,266,028 | $9,521,490 |
| 1999 | $6,581,417 | $987,213 | 46% | $1,665,104 | $1,355,767 | $8,127,095 |
| 1998 | $9,772,086 | $1,465,813 | 46% | $2,472,346 | $2,013,042 | $6,322,509 |
| 1997 | $6,367,151 | $955,073 | 46% | $1,610,894 | $1,311,628 | $3,898,885 |
| 1996 | $8,988,519 | $1,348,278 | 46% | $2,274,103 | $1,851,628 | $2,312,622 |
| 1995 | $2,074,219 | $311,133 | 46% | $524,779 | $427,287 | $427,287 |
Model Notes
- 住宅代理：该批次住宅并非单独采购；美国-加拿大默认适用直至记录
- salary comps: 2 disclosed lead fee(s) flagged as non-market outliers (scale / far-below-quote) and excluded from era medians
- 图片来源： Wikimedia Commons via Wikipedia (Edward Norton)
方法论
We rebuild Edward’s career as a yearly time series. Disclosed salaries and documented backend enter as reported, with citations. Undisclosed lead roles get the median of disclosed salaries for their era and budget band, capped at 15% of the film’s budget. Supporting roles and roles from before the breakthrough get 2.5% of that median, the going-rate ratio measured from disclosed pre-stardom deals. Films with no reported budget are treated as small productions, and every role is estimated unless a source documents it was unpaid. Representation fees come out at sourced rates, taxes follow the eras actually lived through, spending follows measured household savings behavior unless court documents say otherwise, and what remains compounds at real market returns. Undocumented backend enters as an expected value from disclosed deals, endorsements at the median disclosed ambassador fee, and producer or director credits at union-scale floors.
完整的模型、每个费率表以及我们的估算如何与实际交易进行核对的信息均位于 方法页.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is Edward Norton's net worth in 2026?
As of 2026, Edward Norton's net worth is an estimated $133.6 Million. The estimate is built film by film from disclosed salaries and documented backend, then year by year: income, minus representation fees and taxes, minus spending, compounded at real market returns.
How does Edward Norton make money?
电影工资和记录的后端参与。
How is Edward Norton's net worth calculated?
Disclosed paydays enter as reported, with citations. Undisclosed lead roles use the median of disclosed salaries for their era and budget band, capped at 15% of the film's budget, and supporting or early-career roles use the documented pre-stardom fraction of that median. We subtract sourced representation fees, taxes for the years Edward actually worked, and spending from measured savings behavior, then compound at real market returns. Undocumented backend, endorsements, and producing credits enter as estimated lines from disclosed medians. Every rate and source is published.
How much does Edward Norton make per film?
它因角色和时代而异，上面的逐部电影表格列出了每部电影的片酬。披露的发薪日按报告输入。未公开的角色是根据同等演员在同一时代和预算范围内的收入来建模的，突破后的主角收入最高，配角或早期角色只占其中的一小部分。
为什么税率那么高，演员不跟外贷公司避税吗？
Tax comes out at the effective rate for where Edward lived each year, which is the rate shown in the year-by-year table. In a high-tax state like California, combined federal and state income tax reaches close to half of a top earner's income, so those years run in the mid-40s percent. A loan-out company, the corporation many actors run their income through, does not lower the tax on the money they take home. Its real advantage is deducting business costs such as agent, manager, and attorney fees, and the model already subtracts those as a separate line before any tax is applied. High-earning performers also fall outside the pass-through business deduction that other company owners can claim, so it buys them no rate cut.
为什么这个数字与其他净值网站不同？
Most sites publish a single number with no way to check it. This estimate is built in the open: every salary, rate, and assumption is on the page, and the 方法页 lists every source.
这个估计有多准确？
对于个人的净资产没有准确的估计；这是根据公共数据构建的模型。不同之处在于您可以看到它是如何构建的并检查每一步。计算顶部附近的置信度显示了该数字有多少是基于披露的数字，以及数字依赖于假设的页面标记。
Is Edward Norton rich compared to the average person?
Yes. A net worth of $133.6 Million is far above the median American household, which sits near $193,000 according to Federal Reserve data.
What is Edward Norton's biggest source of wealth?
On this page it is film salaries, the largest line in the calculation at $190.5 Million. The full breakdown, with every other line and its source, is above.
How much does Edward Norton make from endorsements?
The model counts $16.0 Million in career endorsement income for Edward: 1 named partnerships x the $4.0M annual fee from the median disclosed film deal x a 4-year term, spread across the deal years. It is an estimate, since the individual deal values are not all public, and it sits as its own line in the calculation above.
探索其他演员
关于NetWorth Explained
We originally created NWE because nobody in the public-figure net worth space showed their work. Magazines and sites threw out big numbers while hiding behind vague claims of “proprietary algorithms” 或者 “insider knowledge.” That’s why we started the world’s only publication that transparently showed every assumption, every variable, and every calculation. We’re still the only ones who do it this way. 了解更多关于NetWorth Explained的信息.