$150.7 Million

Hugh Grant 净资产 2026

最近更新 August 3, 2026

As of 2026, Hugh Grant has an estimated net worth of $150.7 Million, computed film by film and year by year from public records and published rates. Every input, rate, and source behind the number is on this page.

Calculation

  • 披露的工资和记录的后端,每个都有一个引用
  • 未公开的角色是根据其时代、预算范围和职业阶段的已公开可比角色建模的
  • 根据披露的中位数估算后端、背书和生产积分
Hugh Grant

Fast Facts

Birthdate不适用
Birthplace不适用
Breakthroughcareer breakthrough modeled at 1994
Best KnownNotting Hill (1999)

Who Is Hugh Grant?

Hugh Grant is best known for Notting Hill (1999). The earnings behind Hugh's net worth come from film salaries, backend participation, and endorsement deals.

The model tracks Hugh's earning years from 1982 to 2026, with the biggest single year in 2023 at about $35.0 Million of gross income. After representation fees, taxes, and living costs, what stays invested compounds at market returns into an estimated $150.7 Million today.

Data

下面的每一行都是根据公共数据和我们网站上发布的费率表计算得出的 方法页。信心: C级。记录的数字仅占该数字的一小部分,因此大部分数据是根据已发布的比率和可比数据建模的(等级从 A(主要记录在案)到 C(主要建模))。

The Calculation

Hugh Grant net worth line items
LineAmount
Revenue
Film pay, modeled lead roles (40 of 72 films)
era and budget-band medians of disclosed lead salaries (winsorized, thin cells shrunk toward the era median), blended with this actor's disclosed quote history when available; soft breakthrough blend near the career break year
$212,585,001
Film pay, modeled post-breakthrough supporting roles (8 of 72 films)
12.0% of lead cells: lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio
$12,900,635
Film pay, modeled supporting and early roles (24 of 72 films)
时代中位数的 2.5%:成名前的比率
$6,431,827
后端点,估计
12% of disclosed lead deals included points, at a median 2.6% of box office; expected value on 26 commercially viable undisclosed lead roles; cash spread over 3 years; 1 film(s) used band-specific box-office/budget multiples as a gross proxy
$13,744,197
预计认可度(1 个品牌合作伙伴)
1 named partnerships x the $4.0M annual fee from the median disclosed film deal x a 4-year term, spread across the deal years
$16,000,000
残差,估计
SAG residual rates on post-theatrical receipts assumed at half of box office, split by role share and spread over the ten years after each release; 2 film(s) used band-specific box-office proxies
$27,913,816
TV: Honour, Profit and Pleasure
Lord Burlington; one engagement for a television film or special; broadcast network family; priced from tv_episode_rates.csv (en.wikipedia.org)
$75,000
TV: Jenny's War
Peter Baines; stated episode count; broadcast network family; priced from tv_episode_rates.csv (en.wikipedia.org)
$225,000
TV: The Last Place on Earth
Apsley Cherry-Garrard; stated episode count; broadcast network family; priced from tv_episode_rates.csv (en.wikipedia.org)
$450,000
TV: Ladies in Charge
Gerald Boughton-Green; stated episode count; animation format tier; priced from tv_episode_rates.csv (en.wikipedia.org)
$75,000
TV: A Very Peculiar Practice
Preacher Colin; stated episode count; network not identified, priced on the broadcast cell; priced from tv_episode_rates.csv (en.wikipedia.org)
$75,000
TV: Till We Meet Again
Bruno de Lancel; stated episode count; network not identified, priced on the broadcast cell; priced from tv_episode_rates.csv (en.wikipedia.org)
$150,000
TV: Champagne Charlie
Charles Heidsieck; one engagement for a television film or special; network not identified, priced on the broadcast cell; priced from tv_episode_rates.csv (en.wikipedia.org)
$75,000
TV: The Lady and the Highwayman
Lucius Vyne/Silver Blade; one engagement for a television film or special; network not identified, priced on the broadcast cell; priced from tv_episode_rates.csv (en.wikipedia.org)
$75,000
TV: The Trials of Oz
Richard Neville; one engagement for a television film or special; broadcast network family; priced from tv_episode_rates.csv (en.wikipedia.org)
$75,000
TV: Our Sons
James Grant; one engagement for a television film or special; broadcast network family; priced from tv_episode_rates.csv (en.wikipedia.org)
$75,000
TV: Performance
Alsemero/Richard Neville; stated episode count; network not identified, priced on the broadcast cell; priced from tv_episode_rates.csv (en.wikipedia.org)
$150,000
TV: Shakespeare: The Animated Tales
Sebastian; guest default per credited year; cable network family; priced from tv_episode_rates.csv (en.wikipedia.org)
$150,000
TV: The Nanny
Himself; stated episode count; broadcast network family; priced from tv_episode_rates.csv (en.wikipedia.org)
$75,000
TV: Doctor Who and the Curse of Fatal Death
The 12th Doctor; one engagement for a television film or special; broadcast network family; priced from tv_episode_rates.csv (en.wikipedia.org)
$75,000
TV: Robbie the Reindeer
Blitzen; guest default per credited year; animation format tier; priced from tv_episode_rates.csv (en.wikipedia.org)
$24,000
TV: Red Nose Day Actually
David; guest default per credited year; broadcast network family; priced from tv_episode_rates.csv (en.wikipedia.org)
$30,000
TV: W1A
Himself; stated episode count; broadcast network family; priced from tv_episode_rates.csv (en.wikipedia.org)
$15,000
TV: A Very English Scandal
Jeremy Thorpe; stated episode count; broadcast network family; priced from tv_episode_rates.csv (en.wikipedia.org)
$225,000
TV: One Red Nose Day and a Wedding
Charles; guest default per credited year; network not identified, priced on the broadcast cell; priced from tv_episode_rates.csv (en.wikipedia.org)
$30,000
TV: The Undoing
Dr. Jonathan Fraser; stated episode count; cable network family; priced from tv_episode_rates.csv (en.wikipedia.org)
$450,000
TV: Death to 2020
Tennyson Foss; one engagement for a television film or special; streaming network family; priced from tv_episode_rates.csv (en.wikipedia.org)
$75,000
TV: Death to 2021
Tennyson Foss; one engagement for a television film or special; streaming network family; priced from tv_episode_rates.csv (en.wikipedia.org)
$75,000
TV: The Regime
Edward Keplinger; stated episode count; cable network family; priced from tv_episode_rates.csv (en.wikipedia.org)
$15,000
储蓄投资回报
mixed portfolio: 55% actual 60/40 securities returns (taxed) + 45% US long-run home-price rate on the rest
$90,955,742
Expenses
代表费
代理人10%+律师5%
-$42,847,311
Taxes
美国-加拿大有效利率,逐年
-$109,206,028
个人消费
measured household savings rates by income, times a 88% entertainment-household factor
-$73,847,322
估计净资产$150,703,821

电影接电影

Hugh Grant film-by-film pay
FilmYearRoleBudget票房工资已计算
Bridget Jones: Mad About the Boy
no disclosed fee: modeled on the $23.8M shrunk median for 2020s/large (n=2), capped at $7.5M
2025Lead$50,000,000$140,400,000$7,500,000
Heretic
no disclosed fee: modeled on the $25.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid), capped at $1.5M
2024Lead$10,000,000$60,000,000$1,500,000
Paddington in Peru
no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $23.8M shrunk median for 2020s/large (n=2) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio)
2024Supporting$82,500,000$211,000,000$2,850,000
The Regime
no disclosed fee: modeled on the $25.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid); budget unreported, small-film terms
2024Lead$3,000,000
Unfrosted
no disclosed fee: modeled on the $23.8M shrunk median for 2020s/large (n=2), capped at $10.5M
2024Lead$70,000,000$10,500,000
Dungeons & Dragons: Honor Among Thieves
no disclosed fee: modeled on the $16.4M shrunk median for 2020s/tentpole (n=5)
2023Lead$150,000,000$208,200,000$16,428,571
Operation Fortune: Ruse de Guerre
no disclosed fee: modeled on the $23.8M shrunk median for 2020s/large (n=2), capped at $7.5M
2023Lead$50,000,000$49,000,000$7,500,000
Wonka
no disclosed fee: modeled on the $16.4M shrunk median for 2020s/tentpole (n=5)
2023Lead$125,000,000$634,500,000$16,428,571
Glass Onion: A Knives Out Mystery
no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $21.7M shrunk median for 2020s/mid (n=1) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio)
2022Supporting$40,000,000$15,000,000$2,600,000
Death to 2021
no disclosed fee: modeled on the $25.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid); budget unreported, small-film terms
2021Lead$3,000,000
Death to 2020
no disclosed fee: modeled on the $25.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid); budget unreported, small-film terms
2020Lead$3,000,000
The Undoing
no disclosed fee: modeled on the $25.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid); budget unreported, small-film terms
2020Lead$3,000,000
One Red Nose Day and a Wedding
no disclosed fee: modeled on the $5.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid), capped at $0.7M
2019Lead$4,400,000$245,700,000$660,000
The Gentlemen
no disclosed fee: modeled on the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3), capped at $3.3M
2019Lead$22,000,000$115,200,000$3,300,000
A Very English Scandal
no disclosed fee: modeled on the $5.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid); budget unreported, small-film terms
2018Lead$3,000,000
Paddington 2
no disclosed fee: modeled on the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3), capped at $6.0M
2017Lead$40,000,000$290,100,000$5,999,999
Red Nose Day Actually
no disclosed fee: modeled on the $5.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid); budget unreported, small-film terms
2017Lead$2,999,999
W1A
no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $5.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio); budget unreported, small-film terms
2017Supporting$600,000
Florence Foster Jenkins
no disclosed fee: modeled on the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3), capped at $4.3M
2016Lead$29,000,000$56,000,000$4,349,998
The Man from U.N.C.L.E.
no disclosed fee: modeled on the $20.0M shrunk median for 2010s/large (n=8), capped at $11.9M
2015Lead$79,500,000$110,000,000$11,924,990
One Rogue Reporter
no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $5.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio); budget unreported, small-film terms
2014Supporting$599,999
The Rewrite
no disclosed fee: modeled on the $5.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid), capped at $0.7M
2014Lead$4,500,000$4,500,000$674,999
Cloud Atlas
no disclosed fee: modeled on the $20.0M shrunk median for 2010s/tentpole (n=12), capped at $18.5M
2012Lead$123,350,000$130,500,000$18,502,389
The Pirates! In an Adventure with Scientists!
no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $20.0M shrunk median for 2010s/large (n=8) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio)
2012Supporting$55,000,000$123,000,000$2,399,988
I'm Still Here
no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $5.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio); budget unreported, small-film terms
2010Supporting$626,000$599,989
Did You Hear About the Morgans?
no disclosed fee: modeled on the $20.0M shrunk median for 2000s/large (n=18), capped at $8.7M
2009Lead$58,000,000$85,300,000$8,699,628
Music and Lyrics
no disclosed fee: modeled on the $19.4M shrunk median for 2000s/mid (n=2), capped at $6.0M
2007Lead$40,000,000$145,900,000$5,999,050
American Dreamz
no disclosed fee: modeled on the $18.8M median for its era and nearest band (mid), capped at $2.5M
2006Lead$17,000,000$16,500,000$2,549,302
Housewarming
no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $18.8M median for its era and nearest band (mid) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio); budget unreported, small-film terms
2005Supporting$2,248,837
Bridget Jones: The Edge of Reason
no disclosed fee: modeled on the $19.4M shrunk median for 2000s/mid (n=2), capped at $6.8M
2004Lead$45,000,000$265,100,000$6,742,036
Love Actually
no disclosed fee: modeled on the $19.4M shrunk median for 2000s/mid (n=2), capped at $6.0M
2003Lead$40,000,000$246,942,017$5,986,362
About a Boy
no disclosed fee: modeled on the $19.4M shrunk median for 2000s/mid (n=2), capped at $4.5M
2002Lead$30,000,000$130,500,000$4,480,706
Robbie the Reindeer
no disclosed fee: modeled on the $18.8M median for its era and nearest band (mid); budget unreported, small-film terms
2002Lead$2,987,838
Two Weeks Notice
no disclosed fee: modeled on the $20.0M shrunk median for 2000s/large (n=18), capped at $9.0M
2002Lead$60,000,000$199,000,000$8,959,160
Bridget Jones's Diary
no disclosed fee: modeled on the $19.4M shrunk median for 2000s/mid (n=2), capped at $3.8M
2001Lead$25,000,000$282,000,000$3,719,578
Small Time Crooks
no disclosed fee: modeled on the $19.4M shrunk median for 2000s/mid (n=2), capped at $3.8M
2000Lead$25,000,000$29,900,000$3,691,264
Doctor Who and the Curse of Fatal Death
no disclosed fee: modeled on the $10.0M shrunk median for 1990s/small (n=1); budget unreported, small-film terms
1999Lead$2,905,276
Mickey Blue Eyes
no disclosed fee: modeled on the $14.4M shrunk median for 1990s/mid (n=6), capped at $5.4M
1999Lead$36,000,000$54,300,000$5,226,375
Notting Hill
no disclosed fee: modeled on the $14.4M shrunk median for 1990s/mid (n=6), capped at $6.3M
1999Lead$42,000,000$364,000,000$6,095,374
Extreme Measures
soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.79): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $14.4M shrunk median for 1990s/mid (n=6), capped at $5.7M vs early terms
1996Lead$38,000,000$17,400,000$4,585,900
The Nanny
soft-breakthrough supporting blend (w=0.79)
1996Supporting$1,001,822
An Awfully Big Adventure
soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.66): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $2.0M median for its era and nearest band (small), capped at $0.6M vs early terms
1995Lead$4,000,000$2,000,000$413,416
Nine Months
soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.66): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $12.8M shrunk median for 1990s/tentpole (n=1) vs early terms
1995Lead$138,500,000$138,500,000$8,588,547
Restoration
soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.66): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $10.0M shrunk median for 1990s/small (n=1), capped at $2.9M vs early terms
1995Lead$19,000,000$4,000,000$1,967,967
Sense and Sensibility
soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.66): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $10.0M shrunk median for 1990s/small (n=1), capped at $2.4M vs early terms
1995Lead$16,000,000$135,000,000$1,670,626
The Englishman Who Went Up a Hill But Came Down a Mountain
soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.66): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $10.0M shrunk median for 1990s/small (n=1); budget unreported, small-film terms vs early terms
1995Lead$21,000,000$2,067,080
Four Weddings and a Funeral
soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.50): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $2.0M median for its era and nearest band (small), capped at $0.7M vs early terms
1994Lead$4,400,000$245,700,000$355,000
Sirens
soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.50): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $10.0M shrunk median for 1990s/small (n=1); budget unreported, small-film terms vs early terms
1994Lead$1,625,000
Night Train to Venice
soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.34): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $10.0M shrunk median for 1990s/small (n=1); budget unreported, small-film terms vs early terms
1993Lead$1,182,920
The Remains of the Day (film)
soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.34): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $10.0M shrunk median for 1990s/small (n=1), capped at $2.2M vs early terms
1993Lead$15,000,000$23,237,911$928,487
Bitter Moon
soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.21): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $2.0M median for its era and nearest band (small), capped at $0.3M vs early terms
1992Lead$1,900,000$1,900,000$99,023
Shakespeare: The Animated Tales
soft-breakthrough supporting blend (w=0.21)
1992Supporting$448,178
Impromptu
no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $2.0M median for its era and nearest band (small) (pre-stardom rate); soft-breakthrough weight 0.12
1991Lead$4,099,999$4,099,999$117,350
Our Sons
no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $10.0M shrunk median for 1990s/small (n=1) (pre-stardom rate); budget unreported, small-film terms; soft-breakthrough weight 0.12
1991Lead$577,808
Performance
no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $2.0M median for its era and nearest band (small) (pre-stardom rate); soft-breakthrough weight 0.12
1991Lead$1,500,000$70,861
The Trials of Oz
no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $10.0M shrunk median for 1990s/small (n=1) (pre-stardom rate); budget unreported, small-film terms; soft-breakthrough weight 0.12
1991Lead$577,808
The Big Man
no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $10.0M shrunk median for 1990s/small (n=1) (pre-stardom rate); budget unreported, small-film terms; soft-breakthrough weight 0.06
1990Lead$475,872$428,665
Champagne Charlie
no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $4.1M shrunk median for pre1990/small (n=2) (pre-stardom rate); budget unreported, small-film terms; soft-breakthrough weight 0.03
1989Lead$202,908
The Lady and the Highwayman
no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $4.1M shrunk median for pre1990/small (n=2) (pre-stardom rate); budget unreported, small-film terms; soft-breakthrough weight 0.03
1989Lead$202,908
Till We Meet Again
no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $4.1M shrunk median for pre1990/small (n=2) (pre-stardom rate); budget unreported, small-film terms; soft-breakthrough weight 0.03
1989Lead$202,908
Rowing with the Wind
no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $4.1M shrunk median for pre1990/small (n=2) (pre-stardom rate); budget unreported, small-film terms; soft-breakthrough weight 0.02
1988Lead$155,229
The Bengali Night
no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $4.1M shrunk median for pre1990/small (n=2) (pre-stardom rate); budget unreported, small-film terms; soft-breakthrough weight 0.02
1988Lead$155,229
The Dawning
no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $4.1M shrunk median for pre1990/small (n=2) (pre-stardom rate); budget unreported, small-film terms; soft-breakthrough weight 0.02
1988Lead$155,229
The Lair of the White Worm (film)
no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $2.8M median for its era and nearest band (small) (pre-stardom rate); soft-breakthrough weight 0.02
1988Lead$2,000,000$1,200,000$72,909
Maurice
no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $2.8M median for its era and nearest band (small) (pre-stardom rate); soft-breakthrough weight 0.01
1987Lead$1,580,000$2,950,000$70,317
White Mischief
no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $4.1M shrunk median for pre1990/small (n=2) (pre-stardom rate); soft-breakthrough weight 0.01
1987Lead$8,500,000$3,100,000$114,042
A Very Peculiar Practice
no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $4.1M shrunk median for pre1990/small (n=2) (pre-stardom rate); budget unreported, small-film terms; soft-breakthrough weight 0.00
1986Lead$117,044
Ladies in Charge
no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $4.1M shrunk median for pre1990/small (n=2) (pre-stardom rate); budget unreported, small-film terms; soft-breakthrough weight 0.00
1986Lead$117,044
Honour, Profit and Pleasure
no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $4.1M shrunk median for pre1990/small (n=2) (pre-stardom rate); budget unreported, small-film terms; soft-breakthrough weight 0.00
1985Lead$110,288
Jenny's War
no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $4.1M shrunk median for pre1990/small (n=2) (pre-stardom rate); budget unreported, small-film terms; soft-breakthrough weight 0.00
1985Lead$110,288
The Last Place on Earth
no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $4.1M shrunk median for pre1990/small (n=2) (pre-stardom rate); budget unreported, small-film terms; soft-breakthrough weight 0.00
1985Lead$110,288
Privileged
no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $4.1M shrunk median for pre1990/small (n=2) (pre-stardom rate); budget unreported, small-film terms; soft-breakthrough weight 0.00
1982Lead$104,096

建模人物如何工作。 An undisclosed lead role after the breakthrough gets the median of disclosed lead salaries for its era and budget band, capped at 15% of the film’s budget. Supporting and pre-breakthrough roles get 2.5% of that median, the documented going rate for actors before stardom. Films with no reported budget are treated as small productions. Undocumented backend, endorsements, and producer or director credits enter as separate estimated lines in the calculation above, built from disclosed medians. Every median comes from the published tables on our 方法页.

净资产 Over Time

$50M$100M$150M198219912000200920182026$150.7 Million1982: $3,8541983: $3,9321984: $7,8361985: $189,3991986: $251,8341987: $305,2931988: $464,4071989: $727,9321990: $920,2321991: $1,370,4131992: $1,724,6211993: $2,254,3061994: $4,370,0731995: $8,400,8451996: $10,893,9091997: $13,147,2291998: $15,483,8921999: $19,038,9222000: $20,320,0312001: $22,144,0372002: $24,516,8962003: $28,673,9492004: $31,832,8932005: $33,858,5902006: $37,153,3692007: $39,988,1812008: $37,201,1272009: $42,393,6252010: $45,580,6102011: $48,890,5012012: $55,506,6512013: $60,767,7312014: $65,490,6982015: $69,106,4122016: $73,994,0592017: $81,337,4172018: $82,711,6812019: $92,706,3362020: $100,974,6872021: $110,296,2802022: $105,825,7162023: $122,632,4962024: $135,974,7162025: $147,481,9402026: $150,703,821

每年年底的余额模型,与下表相匹配。

逐年

Hugh Grant year by year model
YearIncome代表费税率SpentSavedBalance
2026$1,546,278$231,94245%$487,514$235,371$150,703,821
2025$7,638,624$1,145,79445%$1,968,366$1,602,690$147,481,940
2024$16,853,483$2,528,02245%$4,342,907$3,536,097$135,974,716
2023$34,955,535$5,243,33045%$9,007,552$7,334,161$122,632,496
2022$14,510,343$2,176,55145%$3,739,112$3,044,473$105,825,716
2021$3,906,682$586,00245%$1,006,697$819,677$110,296,280
2020$6,576,772$986,51645%$1,694,742$1,379,899$100,974,687
2019$5,686,260$852,93945%$1,465,270$1,193,057$92,706,336
2018$4,285,954$642,89345%$1,104,430$899,253$82,711,681
2017$8,464,609$1,269,69147%$2,101,895$1,711,412$81,337,417
2016$6,409,546$961,43247%$1,591,590$1,295,910$73,994,059
2015$10,014,524$1,502,17947%$2,486,763$2,024,781$69,106,412
2014$5,007,754$751,16347%$1,243,504$1,012,490$65,490,698
2013$1,062,347$159,35247%$322,759$155,828$60,767,731
2012$15,412,006$2,311,80143%$4,115,875$3,351,242$55,506,651
2011$7,172,413$1,075,86243%$1,915,439$1,559,595$48,890,501
2010$1,339,363$200,90443%$357,685$291,236$45,580,610
2009$7,535,874$1,130,38143%$2,012,503$1,638,627$42,393,625
2008$3,788,934$568,34043%$1,011,859$823,879$37,201,127
2007$5,291,716$793,75743%$1,413,187$1,150,650$39,988,181
2006$4,798,846$719,82743%$1,281,563$1,043,478$37,153,369
2005$3,984,223$597,63343%$1,064,012$866,344$33,858,590
2004$7,364,222$1,104,63343%$1,966,663$1,601,303$31,832,893
2003$8,067,584$1,210,13843%$2,154,500$1,754,245$28,673,949
2002$14,757,625$2,213,64446%$3,733,691$3,040,059$24,516,896
2001$8,896,848$1,334,52746%$2,250,910$1,832,744$22,144,037
2000$4,759,188$713,87846%$1,204,078$980,389$20,320,031
1999$11,921,728$1,788,25946%$3,016,207$2,455,866$19,038,922
1998$4,622,164$693,32546%$1,169,411$952,162$15,483,892
1997$4,658,338$698,75146%$1,178,563$959,614$13,147,229
1996$8,885,269$1,332,79046%$2,247,980$1,830,358$10,893,909
1995$16,692,029$2,503,80446%$4,223,097$3,438,545$8,400,845
1994$10,072,025$1,510,80446%$2,548,230$2,074,829$4,370,073
1993$2,081,054$312,15846%$526,508$428,695$2,254,306
1992$1,174,403$176,16136%$352,148$286,727$1,724,621
1991$1,409,428$211,41436%$422,621$344,108$1,370,413
1990$707,520$106,12836%$212,152$172,739$920,232
1989$859,014$128,85236%$257,578$209,726$727,932
1988$563,228$84,48436%$168,886$137,511$464,407
1987$290,630$43,59545%$91,631$44,239$305,293
1986$369,169$55,37555%$95,230$45,977$251,834
1985$1,051,831$157,77555%$221,762$180,564$189,399
1984$99,259$14,88955%$34,291$3,675$7,836
1983$0$055%$0$0$3,932
1982$104,096$15,61455%$35,963$3,854$3,854

Model Notes

  • 住宅代理:该批次住宅并非单独采购;美国-加拿大默认适用直至记录
  • salary comps: 2 disclosed lead fee(s) flagged as non-market outliers (scale / far-below-quote) and excluded from era medians
  • 图片来源: Wikimedia Commons via Wikipedia (Hugh Grant)
重现这个数字。 净值估计应该像科学发现一样是可重复的:相同的公众投入和相同的公布率应该总是给出相同的答案。电影预算和票房是公开报告的。每一份披露的工资、费率、税率、储蓄率和基准回报率都会在我们的网站上发布并引用 方法页. Undisclosed lead roles use the median of disclosed salaries for their era and budget band, capped at 15% of the film’s budget. Supporting and early-career roles use the documented pre-stardom fraction of that median. Undocumented backend, endorsements, and hyphenate credits enter as estimated lines from disclosed medians. Apply the rates year by year as shown above and you will land on $150.7 Million.

方法论

We rebuild Hugh’s career as a yearly time series. Disclosed salaries and documented backend enter as reported, with citations. Undisclosed lead roles get the median of disclosed salaries for their era and budget band, capped at 15% of the film’s budget. Supporting roles and roles from before the breakthrough get 2.5% of that median, the going-rate ratio measured from disclosed pre-stardom deals. Films with no reported budget are treated as small productions, and every role is estimated unless a source documents it was unpaid. Representation fees come out at sourced rates, taxes follow the eras actually lived through, spending follows measured household savings behavior unless court documents say otherwise, and what remains compounds at real market returns. Undocumented backend enters as an expected value from disclosed deals, endorsements at the median disclosed ambassador fee, and producer or director credits at union-scale floors.

完整的模型、每个费率表以及我们的估算如何与实际交易进行核对的信息均位于 方法页.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Hugh Grant's net worth in 2026?

As of 2026, Hugh Grant's net worth is an estimated $150.7 Million. The estimate is built film by film from disclosed salaries and documented backend, then year by year: income, minus representation fees and taxes, minus spending, compounded at real market returns.

How does Hugh Grant make money?

电影工资和记录的后端参与。

How is Hugh Grant's net worth calculated?

Disclosed paydays enter as reported, with citations. Undisclosed lead roles use the median of disclosed salaries for their era and budget band, capped at 15% of the film's budget, and supporting or early-career roles use the documented pre-stardom fraction of that median. We subtract sourced representation fees, taxes for the years Hugh actually worked, and spending from measured savings behavior, then compound at real market returns. Undocumented backend, endorsements, and producing credits enter as estimated lines from disclosed medians. Every rate and source is published.

How much does Hugh Grant make per film?

它因角色和时代而异,上面的逐部电影表格列出了每部电影的片酬。披露的发薪日按报告输入。未公开的角色是根据同等演员在同一时代和预算范围内的收入来建模的,突破后的主角收入最高,配角或早期角色只占其中的一小部分。

为什么税率那么高,演员不跟外贷公司避税吗?

Tax comes out at the effective rate for where Hugh lived each year, which is the rate shown in the year-by-year table. In a high-tax state like California, combined federal and state income tax reaches close to half of a top earner's income, so those years run in the mid-40s percent. A loan-out company, the corporation many actors run their income through, does not lower the tax on the money they take home. Its real advantage is deducting business costs such as agent, manager, and attorney fees, and the model already subtracts those as a separate line before any tax is applied. High-earning performers also fall outside the pass-through business deduction that other company owners can claim, so it buys them no rate cut.

为什么这个数字与其他净值网站不同?

Most sites publish a single number with no way to check it. This estimate is built in the open: every salary, rate, and assumption is on the page, and the 方法页 lists every source.

这个估计有多准确?

对于个人的净资产没有准确的估计;这是根据公共数据构建的模型。不同之处在于您可以看到它是如何构建的并检查每一步。计算顶部附近的置信度显示了该数字有多少是基于披露的数字,以及数字依赖于假设的页面标记。

Is Hugh Grant rich compared to the average person?

Yes. A net worth of $150.7 Million is far above the median American household, which sits near $193,000 according to Federal Reserve data.

What is Hugh Grant's biggest source of wealth?

On this page it is film salaries, the largest line in the calculation at $212.6 Million. The full breakdown, with every other line and its source, is above.

How much does Hugh Grant make from endorsements?

The model counts $16.0 Million in career endorsement income for Hugh: 1 named partnerships x the $4.0M annual fee from the median disclosed film deal x a 4-year term, spread across the deal years. It is an estimate, since the individual deal values are not all public, and it sits as its own line in the calculation above.

探索其他演员

关于NetWorth Explained

We originally created NWE because nobody in the public-figure net worth space showed their work. Magazines and sites threw out big numbers while hiding behind vague claims of “proprietary algorithms” 或者 “insider knowledge.” That’s why we started the world’s only publication that transparently showed every assumption, every variable, and every calculation. We’re still the only ones who do it this way. 了解更多关于NetWorth Explained的信息.