Jane Fonda 净资产 2026
最近更新 August 3, 2026
As of 2026, Jane Fonda has an estimated net worth of $345.2 Million, computed film by film and year by year from public records and published rates. Every input, rate, and source behind the number is on this page.
Calculation
- 披露的工资和记录的后端,每个都有一个引用
- 未公开的角色是根据其时代、预算范围和职业阶段的已公开可比角色建模的
- 根据披露的中位数估算后端、背书和生产积分

Fast Facts
| Birthdate | December 21, 1937 |
|---|---|
| Birthplace | New York City |
| Breakthrough | Cat Ballou (1965) |
| Best Known | 9 to 5 (1980) |
Who Is Jane Fonda?
Jane Fonda was born December 21, 1937 in New York City, best known for 9 to 5 (1980). The earnings behind Jane's net worth come from film salaries, backend participation, and endorsement deals.
The model tracks Jane's earning years from 1955 to 2026, with the biggest single year in 2020 at about $25.4 Million of gross income. After representation fees, taxes, and living costs, what stays invested compounds at market returns into an estimated $345.2 Million today.
Data
下面的每一行都是根据公共数据和我们网站上发布的费率表计算得出的 方法页。信心: C级。记录的数字仅占该数字的一小部分,因此大部分数据是根据已发布的比率和可比数据建模的(等级从 A(主要记录在案)到 C(主要建模))。
The Calculation
| Line | Amount |
|---|---|
| Revenue | |
| Film pay, modeled lead roles (81 of 115 films) era and budget-band medians of disclosed lead salaries (winsorized, thin cells shrunk toward the era median), blended with this actor's disclosed quote history when available; soft breakthrough blend near the career break year | $274,391,202 |
| Film pay, modeled post-breakthrough supporting roles (13 of 115 films) 12.0% of lead cells: lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio | $28,055,287 |
| Film pay, modeled supporting and early roles (21 of 115 films) 时代中位数的 2.5%:成名前的比率 | $4,202,114 |
| 后端点,估计 12% of disclosed lead deals included points, at a median 2.6% of box office; expected value on 72 commercially viable undisclosed lead roles; cash spread over 3 years; 50 film(s) used band-specific box-office/budget multiples as a gross proxy | $10,869,001 |
| 预计认可度(1 个品牌合作伙伴) 1 named partnerships x the $4.0M annual fee from the median disclosed film deal x a 4-year term, spread across the deal years | $16,000,000 |
| 残差,估计 SAG residual rates on post-theatrical receipts assumed at half of box office, split by role share and spread over the ten years after each release; 70 film(s) used band-specific box-office proxies | $25,613,865 |
| TV: A String of Beads Gloria Winters; one engagement for a television film or special; network not identified, priced on the broadcast cell; priced from tv_episode_rates.csv (en.wikipedia.org) | $75,000 |
| TV: Lily for President? Judy Bernly; one engagement for a television film or special; network not identified, priced on the broadcast cell; priced from tv_episode_rates.csv (en.wikipedia.org) | $75,000 |
| TV: 9 to 5 O'Neil; guest default per credited year; broadcast network family; priced from tv_episode_rates.csv (en.wikipedia.org) | $150,000 |
| TV: The Dollmaker Gertie Nevels; one engagement for a television film or special; broadcast network family; priced from tv_episode_rates.csv (en.wikipedia.org) | $75,000 |
| TV: The Newsroom Leona Lansing; stated episode count; network not identified, priced on the broadcast cell; priced from tv_episode_rates.csv (en.wikipedia.org) | $749,250 |
| TV: The Simpsons Maxine Lombard; guest default per credited year; animation format tier; priced from tv_episode_rates.csv (en.wikipedia.org) | $24,000 |
| TV: Grace and Frankie Grace Hanson; stated episode count; streaming network family; priced from tv_episode_rates.csv (en.wikipedia.org) | $49,937,500 |
| TV: Elena and the Secret of Avalor Shuriki; one engagement for a television film or special; animation format tier; priced from tv_episode_rates.csv (en.wikipedia.org) | $35,000 |
| TV: Elena of Avalor Shuriki; stated episode count; animation format tier; priced from tv_episode_rates.csv (en.wikipedia.org) | $120,000 |
| TV: The Ellen DeGeneres Show Herself (guest host); guest default per credited year; network not identified, priced on the broadcast cell; priced from tv_episode_rates.csv (en.wikipedia.org) | $30,000 |
| TV: Who Wants to Be a Millionaire? Herself (contestant); guest default per credited year; reality format tier; priced from tv_episode_rates.csv (en.wikipedia.org) | $30,000 |
| TV: Make It Work! Herself; guest default per credited year; broadcast network family; priced from tv_episode_rates.csv (en.wikipedia.org) | $30,000 |
| TV: Stoner Cats Ms. Stoner; guest default per credited year; animation format tier; priced from tv_episode_rates.csv (en.wikipedia.org) | $48,000 |
| TV: The Comeback Herself; guest default per credited year; cable network family; priced from tv_episode_rates.csv (en.wikipedia.org) | $30,000 |
| 储蓄投资回报 mixed portfolio: 55% actual 60/40 securities returns (taxed) + 45% US long-run home-price rate on the rest | $261,763,490 |
| Expenses | |
| 代表费 代理人10%+律师5% | -$60,788,409 |
| Taxes 美国-加拿大有效利率,逐年 | -$158,301,590 |
| 个人消费 measured household savings rates by income, times a 88% entertainment-household factor | -$102,773,023 |
| 估计净资产 | $345,156,524 |
电影接电影
| Film | Year | Role | Budget | 票房 | 工资已计算 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gaslit no disclosed fee: modeled on the $23.8M shrunk median for 2020s/large (n=2), capped at $10.5M | 2026 | Lead | $70,000,000 | – | $10,500,000 |
| The Comeback no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $23.8M shrunk median for 2020s/large (n=2) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio) | 2026 | Supporting | $70,000,000 | – | $2,850,000 |
| The Greatest Love Story Never Told no disclosed fee: modeled on the $23.8M shrunk median for 2020s/large (n=2), capped at $10.5M | 2024 | Lead | $70,000,000 | – | $10,500,000 |
| This Is Me... Now: A Love Story no disclosed fee: modeled on the $23.8M shrunk median for 2020s/large (n=2), capped at $10.5M | 2024 | Lead | $70,000,000 | – | $10,500,000 |
| 待公布 no disclosed fee: modeled on the $23.8M shrunk median for 2020s/large (n=2), capped at $10.5M | 2024 | Lead | $70,000,000 | – | $10,500,000 |
| 80 for Brady no disclosed fee: modeled on the $21.7M shrunk median for 2020s/mid (n=1), capped at $4.2M | 2023 | Lead | $28,000,000 | $40,400,000 | $4,200,000 |
| Book Club: The Next Chapter no disclosed fee: modeled on the $21.7M shrunk median for 2020s/mid (n=1), capped at $3.0M | 2023 | Lead | $20,000,000 | $29,100,000 | $3,000,000 |
| Ruby Gillman, Teenage Kraken no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $23.8M shrunk median for 2020s/large (n=2) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio) | 2023 | Supporting | $70,000,000 | $46,200,000 | $2,850,000 |
| Luck no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $16.4M shrunk median for 2020s/tentpole (n=5) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio) | 2022 | Supporting | $140,000,000 | – | $1,971,429 |
| Moving On no disclosed fee: modeled on the $25.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid), capped at $0.3M | 2022 | Lead | $2,100,000 | $2,100,000 | $315,000 |
| 9to5: The Story of a Movement no disclosed fee: modeled on the $23.8M shrunk median for 2020s/large (n=2), capped at $10.5M | 2020 | Lead | $70,000,000 | – | $10,500,000 |
| Make It Work! no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $23.8M shrunk median for 2020s/large (n=2) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio) | 2020 | Supporting | $70,000,000 | – | $2,850,000 |
| Stoner Cats no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $23.8M shrunk median for 2020s/large (n=2) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio) | 2020 | Supporting | $70,000,000 | – | $2,850,000 |
| The Ellen DeGeneres Show no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $23.8M shrunk median for 2020s/large (n=2) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio) | 2020 | Supporting | $70,000,000 | – | $2,850,000 |
| Who Wants to Be a Millionaire? no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $23.8M shrunk median for 2020s/large (n=2) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio) | 2020 | Supporting | $70,000,000 | – | $2,850,000 |
| Alan Pakula: Going for Truth no disclosed fee: modeled on the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3), capped at $6.0M | 2019 | Lead | $40,000,000 | – | $6,000,000 |
| Book Club no disclosed fee: modeled on the $5.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid), capped at $1.5M | 2018 | Lead | $10,000,000 | $104,400,000 | $1,500,000 |
| Jane Fonda in Five Acts no disclosed fee: modeled on the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3), capped at $6.0M | 2018 | Lead | $40,000,000 | – | $6,000,000 |
| Our Souls at Night no disclosed fee: modeled on the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3), capped at $6.0M | 2017 | Lead | $40,000,000 | – | $6,000,000 |
| Elena and the Secret of Avalor no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio) | 2016 | Supporting | $40,000,000 | – | $1,320,000 |
| Elena of Avalor no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio) | 2016 | Supporting | $40,000,000 | – | $1,320,000 |
| Fathers and Daughters no disclosed fee: modeled on the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3), capped at $3.4M | 2015 | Lead | $22,400,000 | $5,100,000 | $3,360,000 |
| Youth no disclosed fee: modeled on the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3), capped at $6.0M | 2015 | Lead | $40,000,000 | $24,000,000 | $6,000,000 |
| Better Living Through Chemistry no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio) | 2014 | Supporting | $40,000,000 | $120,823 | $1,320,000 |
| Grace and Frankie no disclosed fee: modeled on the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3), capped at $6.0M | 2014 | Lead | $40,000,000 | – | $6,000,000 |
| The Simpsons no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $20.0M shrunk median for 2010s/large (n=8) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio) | 2014 | Supporting | $75,000,000 | $536,400,000 | $2,400,000 |
| This Is Where I Leave You no disclosed fee: modeled on the $5.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid), capped at $2.9M | 2014 | Lead | $19,000,000 | $40,996,320 | $2,850,000 |
| The Butler no disclosed fee: modeled on the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3), capped at $4.5M | 2013 | Lead | $30,000,000 | $177,300,000 | $4,500,000 |
| Jane Fonda's Am/Pm Yoga for Beginners no disclosed fee: modeled on the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3), capped at $6.0M | 2012 | Lead | $40,000,000 | – | $6,000,000 |
| All Together no disclosed fee: modeled on the $5.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid), capped at $1.1M | 2011 | Lead | $7,000,000 | $11,100,000 | $1,050,000 |
| Jane Fonda's Prime Time: Firm & Burn no disclosed fee: modeled on the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3), capped at $6.0M | 2011 | Lead | $40,000,000 | – | $6,000,000 |
| Jane Fonda's Prime Time: Trim, Tone & Flex no disclosed fee: modeled on the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3), capped at $6.0M | 2011 | Lead | $40,000,000 | – | $6,000,000 |
| Miss Representation no disclosed fee: modeled on the $5.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid), capped at $0.1M | 2011 | Lead | $750,000 | – | $112,500 |
| Peace, Love & Misunderstanding no disclosed fee: modeled on the $5.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid), capped at $0.1M | 2011 | Lead | $542,762 | $542,762 | $81,414 |
| Jane Fonda's Prime Time: Fit and Strong no disclosed fee: modeled on the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3), capped at $6.0M | 2010 | Lead | $40,000,000 | – | $6,000,000 |
| Jane Fonda's Prime Time: Walkout no disclosed fee: modeled on the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3), capped at $6.0M | 2010 | Lead | $40,000,000 | – | $6,000,000 |
| 33 Variations no disclosed fee: modeled on the $19.4M shrunk median for 2000s/mid (n=2), capped at $6.0M | 2009 | Lead | $40,000,000 | – | $6,000,000 |
| Georgia Rule no disclosed fee: modeled on the $19.4M shrunk median for 2000s/mid (n=2), capped at $3.0M | 2007 | Lead | $20,000,000 | $25,000,000 | $3,000,000 |
| Monster-in-Law no disclosed fee: modeled on the $19.4M shrunk median for 2000s/mid (n=2), capped at $6.5M | 2005 | Lead | $43,000,000 | $155,400,000 | $6,450,000 |
| V-Day: Until the Violence Stops no disclosed fee: modeled on the $19.4M shrunk median for 2000s/mid (n=2), capped at $6.0M | 2003 | Lead | $40,000,000 | – | $6,000,000 |
| Searching for Debra Winger no disclosed fee: modeled on the $19.4M shrunk median for 2000s/mid (n=2), capped at $6.0M | 2002 | Lead | $40,000,000 | – | $6,000,000 |
| Generation 2000: Changing Girls' Realities no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $19.4M shrunk median for 2000s/mid (n=2) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio) | 2000 | Supporting | $40,000,000 | – | $2,325,000 |
| Jane Fonda's Personal Trainer Series: Abs, Buns & Thighs no disclosed fee: modeled on the $14.4M shrunk median for 1990s/mid (n=6), capped at $3.9M | 1995 | Lead | $26,000,000 | – | $3,900,000 |
| Jane Fonda's Personal Trainer Series: Low Impact Aerobics & Stretch no disclosed fee: modeled on the $14.4M shrunk median for 1990s/mid (n=6), capped at $3.9M | 1995 | Lead | $26,000,000 | – | $3,900,000 |
| Jane Fonda's Personal Trainer Series: Total Body Sculpting no disclosed fee: modeled on the $14.4M shrunk median for 1990s/mid (n=6), capped at $3.9M | 1995 | Lead | $26,000,000 | – | $3,900,000 |
| Jane Fonda's Step and Stretch Workout no disclosed fee: modeled on the $14.4M shrunk median for 1990s/mid (n=6), capped at $3.9M | 1994 | Lead | $26,000,000 | – | $3,900,000 |
| Jane Fonda's Favorite Fat Burners no disclosed fee: modeled on the $14.4M shrunk median for 1990s/mid (n=6), capped at $3.9M | 1993 | Lead | $26,000,000 | – | $3,900,000 |
| Jane Fonda's Pregnancy Workout no disclosed fee: modeled on the $14.4M shrunk median for 1990s/mid (n=6), capped at $3.9M | 1993 | Lead | $26,000,000 | – | $3,900,000 |
| Jane Fonda's Yoga Exercise Workout no disclosed fee: modeled on the $14.4M shrunk median for 1990s/mid (n=6), capped at $3.9M | 1993 | Lead | $26,000,000 | – | $3,900,000 |
| Jane Fonda's Step Aerobic and Abdominal Workout no disclosed fee: modeled on the $14.4M shrunk median for 1990s/mid (n=6), capped at $3.9M | 1992 | Lead | $26,000,000 | – | $3,899,999 |
| Jane Fonda's Lower Body Solution no disclosed fee: modeled on the $14.4M shrunk median for 1990s/mid (n=6), capped at $3.9M | 1991 | Lead | $26,000,000 | – | $3,899,998 |
| Jane Fonda's Lean Routine no disclosed fee: modeled on the $14.4M shrunk median for 1990s/mid (n=6), capped at $3.9M | 1990 | Lead | $26,000,000 | – | $3,899,997 |
| Jane Fonda's Workout Presents Fun House Fitness: The Fun House Funk no disclosed fee: modeled on the $14.4M shrunk median for 1990s/mid (n=6), capped at $3.9M | 1990 | Lead | $26,000,000 | – | $3,899,997 |
| Jane Fonda's Workout Presents Fun House Fitness: The Swamp Stomp no disclosed fee: modeled on the $14.4M shrunk median for 1990s/mid (n=6), capped at $3.9M | 1990 | Lead | $26,000,000 | – | $3,899,997 |
| Stanley & Iris no disclosed fee: modeled on the $14.4M shrunk median for 1990s/mid (n=6), capped at $3.5M | 1990 | Lead | $23,000,000 | $5,800,000 | $3,449,997 |
| The Earth Day Special no disclosed fee: modeled on the $14.4M shrunk median for 1990s/mid (n=6), capped at $3.9M | 1990 | Lead | $26,000,000 | – | $3,899,997 |
| Jane Fonda's Light Aerobics and Stress Reduction Program no disclosed fee: modeled on the $4.1M shrunk median for pre1990/small (n=2), capped at $2.1M | 1989 | Lead | $14,000,000 | – | $2,099,997 |
| Old Gringo no disclosed fee: modeled on the $6.3M shrunk median for pre1990/mid (n=4), capped at $3.9M | 1989 | Lead | $26,000,000 | $3,574,256 | $3,899,994 |
| Jane Fonda's Complete Workout no disclosed fee: modeled on the $4.1M shrunk median for pre1990/small (n=2), capped at $2.1M | 1988 | Lead | $14,000,000 | – | $2,099,994 |
| Jane Fonda's Sports Aid no disclosed fee: modeled on the $4.1M shrunk median for pre1990/small (n=2), capped at $2.1M | 1987 | Lead | $14,000,000 | – | $2,099,988 |
| Jane Fonda's Workout with Weights no disclosed fee: modeled on the $4.1M shrunk median for pre1990/small (n=2), capped at $2.1M | 1987 | Lead | $14,000,000 | – | $2,099,988 |
| Start Up with Jane Fonda no disclosed fee: modeled on the $4.1M shrunk median for pre1990/small (n=2), capped at $2.1M | 1987 | Lead | $14,000,000 | – | $2,099,988 |
| Jane Fonda's Low Impact Aerobic Workout no disclosed fee: modeled on the $4.1M shrunk median for pre1990/small (n=2), capped at $2.1M | 1986 | Lead | $14,000,000 | – | $2,099,976 |
| The Morning After no disclosed fee: modeled on the $4.1M shrunk median for pre1990/small (n=2), capped at $2.2M | 1986 | Lead | $15,000,000 | $25,100,000 | $2,249,974 |
| Agnes of God no disclosed fee: modeled on the $4.1M shrunk median for pre1990/small (n=2), capped at $1.1M | 1985 | Lead | $7,500,000 | $25,600,000 | $1,124,976 |
| Jane Fonda's New Workout no disclosed fee: modeled on the $4.1M shrunk median for pre1990/small (n=2), capped at $2.1M | 1985 | Lead | $14,000,000 | – | $2,099,953 |
| Jane Fonda's Prime Time Workout no disclosed fee: modeled on the $4.1M shrunk median for pre1990/small (n=2), capped at $2.1M | 1984 | Lead | $14,000,000 | – | $2,099,909 |
| Jane Fonda's Workout Challenge no disclosed fee: modeled on the $4.1M shrunk median for pre1990/small (n=2), capped at $2.1M | 1984 | Lead | $14,000,000 | – | $2,099,909 |
| Terror in the Aisles no disclosed fee: modeled on the $4.1M shrunk median for pre1990/small (n=2), capped at $2.1M | 1984 | Lead | $14,000,000 | $10,004,817 | $2,099,909 |
| The Dollmaker no disclosed fee: modeled on the $4.1M shrunk median for pre1990/small (n=2), capped at $2.1M | 1984 | Lead | $14,000,000 | – | $2,099,909 |
| The Newsroom no disclosed fee: modeled on the $4.1M shrunk median for pre1990/small (n=2), capped at $2.1M | 1984 | Lead | $14,000,000 | – | $2,099,909 |
| Jane Fonda's Pregnancy, Birth and Recovery Workout no disclosed fee: modeled on the $4.1M shrunk median for pre1990/small (n=2), capped at $2.1M | 1983 | Lead | $14,000,000 | – | $2,099,823 |
| 9 to 5 no disclosed fee: modeled on the $4.1M shrunk median for pre1990/small (n=2), capped at $2.1M | 1982 | Lead | $14,000,000 | – | $2,099,656 |
| Jane Fonda's Workout no disclosed fee: modeled on the $4.1M shrunk median for pre1990/small (n=2), capped at $2.1M | 1982 | Lead | $14,000,000 | – | $2,099,656 |
| Lily for President? no disclosed fee: modeled on the $4.1M shrunk median for pre1990/small (n=2), capped at $2.1M | 1982 | Lead | $14,000,000 | – | $2,099,656 |
| On Golden Pond no disclosed fee: modeled on the $4.1M shrunk median for pre1990/small (n=2), capped at $1.1M | 1981 | Lead | $7,500,000 | $119,300,000 | $1,124,657 |
| Rollover no disclosed fee: modeled on the $4.1M shrunk median for pre1990/small (n=2), capped at $2.4M | 1981 | Lead | $16,000,000 | $10,851,261 | $2,399,230 |
| Sois belle et tais-toi (Be Pretty and Shut Up) no disclosed fee: modeled on the $4.1M shrunk median for pre1990/small (n=2), capped at $2.1M | 1981 | Lead | $14,000,000 | – | $2,099,330 |
| 9 to 5 no disclosed fee: modeled on the $4.1M shrunk median for pre1990/small (n=2), capped at $1.5M | 1980 | Lead | $10,000,000 | $103,300,000 | $1,499,088 |
| The China Syndrome no disclosed fee: modeled on the $4.1M shrunk median for pre1990/small (n=2), capped at $0.9M | 1979 | Lead | $5,900,000 | $51,700,000 | $884,006 |
| The Electric Horseman no disclosed fee: modeled on the $4.1M shrunk median for pre1990/small (n=2), capped at $1.9M | 1979 | Lead | $12,500,000 | $61,800,000 | $1,872,748 |
| California Suite no disclosed fee: modeled on the $2.8M median for its era and nearest band (small), capped at $0.5M | 1978 | Lead | $3,025,000 | $42,900,000 | $452,798 |
| Comes a Horseman no disclosed fee: modeled on the $4.1M shrunk median for pre1990/small (n=2), capped at $1.6M | 1978 | Lead | $11,000,000 | $9,585,769 | $1,646,175 |
| Coming Home no disclosed fee: modeled on the $2.8M median for its era and nearest band (small), capped at $0.5M | 1978 | Lead | $3,000,000 | $32,700,000 | $449,057 |
| Fun with Dick and Jane no disclosed fee: modeled on the $2.8M median for its era and nearest band (small), capped at $0.7M | 1977 | Lead | $4,500,000 | $13,600,000 | $672,087 |
| Julia no disclosed fee: modeled on the $4.1M shrunk median for pre1990/small (n=2), capped at $1.2M | 1977 | Lead | $7,840,000 | $20,714,400 | $1,170,845 |
| The Blue Bird no disclosed fee: modeled on the $4.1M shrunk median for pre1990/small (n=2), capped at $1.8M | 1976 | Lead | $12,000,000 | $3,500,000 | $1,784,192 |
| Introduction to the Enemy no disclosed fee: modeled on the $2.8M median for its era and nearest band (small), capped at $0.5M | 1974 | Lead | $3,025,000 | – | $440,489 |
| Steelyard Blues no disclosed fee: modeled on the $2.8M median for its era and nearest band (small), capped at $0.5M | 1973 | Lead | $3,025,000 | $1,000,000 | $428,737 |
| F.T.A. no disclosed fee: modeled on the $2.8M median for its era and nearest band (small), capped at $0.5M | 1972 | Lead | $3,025,000 | – | $407,857 |
| Letter to Jane no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $2.8M median for its era and nearest band (small) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio) | 1972 | Supporting | $3,025,000 | – | $298,858 |
| Tout Va Bien no disclosed fee: modeled on the $2.8M median for its era and nearest band (small), capped at $0.5M | 1972 | Lead | $3,025,000 | – | $407,857 |
| Klute soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.79): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $2.8M median for its era and nearest band (small), capped at $0.4M vs early terms | 1971 | Lead | $2,500,000 | $12,500,000 | $311,114 |
| They Shoot Horses, Don't They? soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.50): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $2.8M median for its era and nearest band (small), capped at $0.7M vs early terms | 1969 | Lead | $4,860,000 | $12,600,000 | $398,875 |
| Barbarella soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.34): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $4.1M shrunk median for pre1990/small (n=2), capped at $1.0M vs early terms | 1968 | Lead | $6,500,000 | $5,500,000 | $398,903 |
| Spirits of the Dead soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.34): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $4.1M shrunk median for pre1990/small (n=2), capped at $2.2M vs early terms | 1968 | Lead | $15,000,000 | – | $831,439 |
| Barefoot in the Park soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.21): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $2.8M median for its era and nearest band (small), capped at $0.3M vs early terms | 1967 | Lead | $2,000,000 | $30,000,000 | $116,991 |
| Hurry Sundown soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.21): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $2.8M median for its era and nearest band (small), capped at $0.6M vs early terms | 1967 | Lead | $3,785,000 | $4,050,000 | $172,846 |
| Any Wednesday no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $4.1M shrunk median for pre1990/small (n=2) (pre-stardom rate); soft-breakthrough weight 0.12 | 1966 | Lead | $15,000,000 | $1,500,000 | $359,039 |
| The Chase no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $4.1M shrunk median for pre1990/small (n=2) (pre-stardom rate); soft-breakthrough weight 0.12 | 1966 | Lead | $15,000,000 | $3,300,000 | $359,039 |
| The Game Is Over no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $4.1M shrunk median for pre1990/small (n=2) (pre-stardom rate); soft-breakthrough weight 0.12 | 1966 | Lead | $15,000,000 | – | $359,039 |
| Cat Ballou no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $4.1M shrunk median for pre1990/small (n=2) (pre-stardom rate); soft-breakthrough weight 0.06 | 1965 | Lead | $15,000,000 | $20,700,000 | $242,606 |
| Circle of Love no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $4.1M shrunk median for pre1990/small (n=2) (pre-stardom rate); soft-breakthrough weight 0.03 | 1964 | Lead | $15,000,000 | – | $177,075 |
| In the Cool of the Day no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $2.8M median for its era and nearest band (small) (pre-stardom rate); soft-breakthrough weight 0.02 | 1963 | Lead | $1,500,000 | – | $71,560 |
| Strange Interlude no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $4.1M shrunk median for pre1990/small (n=2) (pre-stardom rate); soft-breakthrough weight 0.02 | 1963 | Lead | $15,000,000 | – | $141,739 |
| Sunday in New York no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $2.8M median for its era and nearest band (small) (pre-stardom rate); soft-breakthrough weight 0.02 | 1963 | Lead | $2,000,000 | $2,000,000 | $72,909 |
| Period of Adjustment no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $2.8M median for its era and nearest band (small) (pre-stardom rate); soft-breakthrough weight 0.01 | 1962 | Lead | $1,900,000 | $4,000,000 | $70,765 |
| The Chapman Report no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $4.1M shrunk median for pre1990/small (n=2) (pre-stardom rate); soft-breakthrough weight 0.01 | 1962 | Lead | $15,000,000 | $2,500,000 | $123,125 |
| The Fun Couple no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $4.1M shrunk median for pre1990/small (n=2) (pre-stardom rate); soft-breakthrough weight 0.01 | 1962 | Lead | $15,000,000 | – | $123,125 |
| Walk on the Wild Side no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $2.8M median for its era and nearest band (small) (pre-stardom rate); soft-breakthrough weight 0.01 | 1962 | Lead | $4,500,000 | $3,000,000 | $74,398 |
| A String of Beads no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $4.1M shrunk median for pre1990/small (n=2) (pre-stardom rate); soft-breakthrough weight 0.00 | 1961 | Lead | $15,000,000 | – | $113,440 |
| Invitation to a March no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $4.1M shrunk median for pre1990/small (n=2) (pre-stardom rate); soft-breakthrough weight 0.00 | 1960 | Lead | $15,000,000 | – | $108,433 |
| Tall Story no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $4.1M shrunk median for pre1990/small (n=2) (pre-stardom rate); soft-breakthrough weight 0.00 | 1960 | Lead | $15,000,000 | $1,700,000 | $108,433 |
| There Was a Little Girl no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $4.1M shrunk median for pre1990/small (n=2) (pre-stardom rate); soft-breakthrough weight 0.00 | 1960 | Lead | $15,000,000 | – | $108,433 |
| The Country Girl no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $2.8M median for its era and nearest band (small) (pre-stardom rate); soft-breakthrough weight 0.00 | 1955 | Lead | $2,500,000 | – | $68,777 |
建模人物如何工作。 An undisclosed lead role after the breakthrough gets the median of disclosed lead salaries for its era and budget band, capped at 15% of the film’s budget. Supporting and pre-breakthrough roles get 2.5% of that median, the documented going rate for actors before stardom. Films with no reported budget are treated as small productions. Undocumented backend, endorsements, and producer or director credits enter as separate estimated lines in the calculation above, built from disclosed medians. Every median comes from the published tables on our 方法页.
净资产 Over Time
每年年底的余额模型,与下表相匹配。
逐年
| Year | Income | 代表费 | 税率 | Spent | Saved | Balance |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | $10,736,081 | $1,610,412 | 45% | $2,766,538 | $2,252,580 | $345,156,524 |
| 2025 | $5,302,308 | $795,346 | 45% | $1,366,331 | $1,112,499 | $336,097,961 |
| 2024 | $23,227,250 | $3,484,088 | 45% | $5,985,337 | $4,873,402 | $312,241,480 |
| 2023 | $17,263,577 | $2,589,536 | 45% | $4,448,582 | $3,622,140 | $284,609,691 |
| 2022 | $14,294,258 | $2,144,139 | 45% | $3,683,430 | $2,999,136 | $257,902,327 |
| 2021 | $10,524,282 | $1,578,642 | 45% | $2,711,960 | $2,208,142 | $273,540,901 |
| 2020 | $25,351,111 | $3,802,667 | 45% | $6,532,626 | $5,319,018 | $250,261,146 |
| 2019 | $16,507,941 | $2,476,191 | 45% | $4,253,865 | $3,463,597 | $228,000,759 |
| 2018 | $12,613,071 | $1,891,961 | 45% | $3,250,212 | $2,646,399 | $202,941,544 |
| 2017 | $11,808,471 | $1,771,271 | 47% | $2,932,227 | $2,387,489 | $199,132,213 |
| 2016 | $9,033,203 | $1,354,980 | 47% | $2,243,085 | $1,826,373 | $182,828,971 |
| 2015 | $12,950,250 | $1,942,537 | 47% | $3,215,749 | $2,618,338 | $172,059,955 |
| 2014 | $12,715,228 | $1,907,284 | 47% | $3,157,390 | $2,570,821 | $165,423,076 |
| 2013 | $7,983,586 | $1,197,538 | 47% | $1,982,449 | $1,614,157 | $153,480,722 |
| 2012 | $6,574,257 | $986,139 | 43% | $1,755,697 | $1,429,530 | $139,075,067 |
| 2011 | $11,754,856 | $1,763,228 | 43% | $3,139,210 | $2,556,018 | $129,028,981 |
| 2010 | $12,828,965 | $1,924,345 | 43% | $3,426,057 | $2,789,576 | $121,795,997 |
| 2009 | $8,097,111 | $1,214,567 | 43% | $2,162,385 | $1,760,665 | $111,397,289 |
| 2008 | $2,025,763 | $303,864 | 43% | $540,993 | $440,489 | $100,076,218 |
| 2007 | $2,469,578 | $370,437 | 43% | $659,517 | $536,994 | $109,525,920 |
| 2006 | $1,244,052 | $186,608 | 43% | $332,232 | $270,511 | $104,262,698 |
| 2005 | $4,919,035 | $737,855 | 43% | $1,313,660 | $1,069,613 | $97,508,710 |
| 2004 | $2,278,699 | $341,805 | 43% | $608,541 | $495,489 | $93,050,209 |
| 2003 | $4,583,132 | $687,470 | 43% | $1,223,955 | $996,573 | $87,785,967 |
| 2002 | $6,297,256 | $944,588 | 46% | $1,593,211 | $1,297,230 | $79,042,715 |
| 2001 | $2,052,889 | $307,933 | 46% | $519,382 | $422,893 | $80,160,728 |
| 2000 | $1,981,694 | $297,254 | 46% | $501,370 | $408,227 | $79,772,136 |
| 1999 | $1,063,347 | $159,502 | 46% | $269,028 | $219,049 | $78,129,848 |
| 1998 | $375,377 | $56,307 | 46% | $116,198 | $56,100 | $72,746,693 |
| 1997 | $543,096 | $81,464 | 46% | $168,115 | $81,166 | $65,765,041 |
| 1996 | $613,912 | $92,087 | 46% | $190,036 | $91,749 | $58,711,581 |
| 1995 | $8,886,835 | $1,333,025 | 46% | $2,248,376 | $1,830,681 | $54,333,691 |
| 1994 | $6,861,165 | $1,029,175 | 46% | $1,735,880 | $1,413,395 | $46,237,016 |
| 1993 | $9,909,753 | $1,486,463 | 46% | $2,507,175 | $2,041,401 | $44,024,143 |
| 1992 | $6,837,739 | $1,025,661 | 36% | $2,050,315 | $1,669,415 | $39,660,332 |
| 1991 | $4,527,603 | $679,140 | 36% | $1,357,614 | $1,105,402 | $36,208,016 |
| 1990 | $15,052,591 | $2,257,889 | 36% | $4,513,561 | $3,675,048 | $31,474,601 |
| 1989 | $10,381,994 | $1,557,299 | 36% | $3,113,070 | $2,534,735 | $27,072,072 |
| 1988 | $3,803,695 | $570,554 | 36% | $1,140,549 | $928,662 | $21,989,906 |
| 1987 | $5,591,605 | $838,741 | 45% | $1,440,878 | $1,173,197 | $19,669,398 |
| 1986 | $5,480,607 | $822,091 | 55% | $1,155,498 | $940,834 | $17,842,927 |
| 1985 | $4,057,725 | $608,659 | 55% | $855,506 | $696,573 | $15,550,827 |
| 1984 | $8,851,859 | $1,327,779 | 55% | $1,866,273 | $1,519,563 | $13,173,476 |
| 1983 | $5,143,165 | $771,475 | 55% | $1,084,354 | $882,907 | $11,014,447 |
| 1982 | $5,852,290 | $877,844 | 55% | $1,233,862 | $1,004,639 | $9,930,449 |
| 1981 | $6,401,334 | $960,200 | 55% | $1,349,619 | $1,098,891 | $8,748,650 |
| 1980 | $3,189,359 | $478,404 | 55% | $672,425 | $547,504 | $7,497,925 |
| 1979 | $2,702,117 | $405,318 | 55% | $569,698 | $463,862 | $6,812,468 |
| 1978 | $2,780,303 | $417,046 | 55% | $586,182 | $477,284 | $6,222,599 |
| 1977 | $2,146,772 | $322,016 | 55% | $452,613 | $368,528 | $5,631,282 |
| 1976 | $1,873,247 | $280,987 | 55% | $394,944 | $321,573 | $5,158,299 |
| 1975 | $618,987 | $92,848 | 55% | $130,503 | $106,259 | $4,740,726 |
| 1974 | $406,785 | $61,018 | 55% | $85,764 | $69,831 | $4,542,482 |
| 1973 | $552,014 | $82,802 | 55% | $116,383 | $94,762 | $4,383,877 |
| 1972 | $5,040,284 | $756,043 | 55% | $1,062,663 | $865,245 | $4,203,985 |
| 1971 | $4,692,915 | $703,937 | 55% | $989,426 | $805,614 | $3,272,472 |
| 1970 | $4,242,767 | $636,415 | 54% | $914,398 | $744,524 | $2,417,895 |
| 1969 | $4,421,161 | $663,174 | 54% | $952,845 | $775,829 | $1,640,158 |
| 1968 | $1,096,507 | $164,476 | 54% | $236,318 | $192,416 | $847,174 |
| 1967 | $667,368 | $100,105 | 54% | $143,831 | $117,110 | $641,762 |
| 1966 | $923,250 | $138,488 | 54% | $198,978 | $162,013 | $514,239 |
| 1965 | $564,507 | $84,676 | 54% | $121,662 | $99,060 | $345,235 |
| 1964 | $258,072 | $38,711 | 53% | $69,530 | $33,569 | $241,289 |
| 1963 | $302,491 | $45,374 | 53% | $81,498 | $39,347 | $203,597 |
| 1962 | $393,021 | $58,953 | 53% | $86,545 | $70,467 | $160,989 |
| 1961 | $294,790 | $44,219 | 53% | $79,423 | $38,345 | $88,726 |
| 1960 | $263,269 | $39,490 | 53% | $70,931 | $34,245 | $49,380 |
| 1959 | $99,117 | $14,867 | 53% | $31,234 | $8,363 | $14,835 |
| 1958 | $1,527 | $229 | 53% | $551 | $59 | $6,343 |
| 1957 | $1,527 | $229 | 53% | $551 | $59 | $6,160 |
| 1956 | $1,527 | $229 | 53% | $551 | $59 | $5,980 |
| 1955 | $68,777 | $10,317 | 53% | $21,673 | $5,803 | $5,803 |
Model Notes
- 住宅代理:该批次住宅并非单独采购;美国-加拿大默认适用直至记录
- salary comps: 2 disclosed lead fee(s) flagged as non-market outliers (scale / far-below-quote) and excluded from era medians
- 图片来源: Wikimedia Commons via Wikipedia (Jane Fonda)
方法论
We rebuild Jane’s career as a yearly time series. Disclosed salaries and documented backend enter as reported, with citations. Undisclosed lead roles get the median of disclosed salaries for their era and budget band, capped at 15% of the film’s budget. Supporting roles and roles from before the breakthrough get 2.5% of that median, the going-rate ratio measured from disclosed pre-stardom deals. Films with no reported budget are treated as small productions, and every role is estimated unless a source documents it was unpaid. Representation fees come out at sourced rates, taxes follow the eras actually lived through, spending follows measured household savings behavior unless court documents say otherwise, and what remains compounds at real market returns. Undocumented backend enters as an expected value from disclosed deals, endorsements at the median disclosed ambassador fee, and producer or director credits at union-scale floors.
完整的模型、每个费率表以及我们的估算如何与实际交易进行核对的信息均位于 方法页.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is Jane Fonda's net worth in 2026?
As of 2026, Jane Fonda's net worth is an estimated $345.2 Million. The estimate is built film by film from disclosed salaries and documented backend, then year by year: income, minus representation fees and taxes, minus spending, compounded at real market returns.
How does Jane Fonda make money?
电影工资和记录的后端参与。
How is Jane Fonda's net worth calculated?
Disclosed paydays enter as reported, with citations. Undisclosed lead roles use the median of disclosed salaries for their era and budget band, capped at 15% of the film's budget, and supporting or early-career roles use the documented pre-stardom fraction of that median. We subtract sourced representation fees, taxes for the years Jane actually worked, and spending from measured savings behavior, then compound at real market returns. Undocumented backend, endorsements, and producing credits enter as estimated lines from disclosed medians. Every rate and source is published.
How much does Jane Fonda make per film?
它因角色和时代而异,上面的逐部电影表格列出了每部电影的片酬。披露的发薪日按报告输入。未公开的角色是根据同等演员在同一时代和预算范围内的收入来建模的,突破后的主角收入最高,配角或早期角色只占其中的一小部分。
为什么税率那么高,演员不跟外贷公司避税吗?
Tax comes out at the effective rate for where Jane lived each year, which is the rate shown in the year-by-year table. In a high-tax state like California, combined federal and state income tax reaches close to half of a top earner's income, so those years run in the mid-40s percent. A loan-out company, the corporation many actors run their income through, does not lower the tax on the money they take home. Its real advantage is deducting business costs such as agent, manager, and attorney fees, and the model already subtracts those as a separate line before any tax is applied. High-earning performers also fall outside the pass-through business deduction that other company owners can claim, so it buys them no rate cut.
为什么这个数字与其他净值网站不同?
Most sites publish a single number with no way to check it. This estimate is built in the open: every salary, rate, and assumption is on the page, and the 方法页 lists every source.
这个估计有多准确?
对于个人的净资产没有准确的估计;这是根据公共数据构建的模型。不同之处在于您可以看到它是如何构建的并检查每一步。计算顶部附近的置信度显示了该数字有多少是基于披露的数字,以及数字依赖于假设的页面标记。
Is Jane Fonda rich compared to the average person?
Yes. A net worth of $345.2 Million is far above the median American household, which sits near $193,000 according to Federal Reserve data.
What is Jane Fonda's biggest source of wealth?
On this page it is film salaries, the largest line in the calculation at $274.4 Million. The full breakdown, with every other line and its source, is above.
How much does Jane Fonda make from endorsements?
The model counts $16.0 Million in career endorsement income for Jane: 1 named partnerships x the $4.0M annual fee from the median disclosed film deal x a 4-year term, spread across the deal years. It is an estimate, since the individual deal values are not all public, and it sits as its own line in the calculation above.
探索其他演员
关于NetWorth Explained
We originally created NWE because nobody in the public-figure net worth space showed their work. Magazines and sites threw out big numbers while hiding behind vague claims of “proprietary algorithms” 或者 “insider knowledge.” That’s why we started the world’s only publication that transparently showed every assumption, every variable, and every calculation. We’re still the only ones who do it this way. 了解更多关于NetWorth Explained的信息.