Jennifer Lawrence 净资产 2026
最近更新 August 3, 2026
As of 2026, Jennifer Lawrence has an estimated net worth of $150.7 Million, computed film by film and year by year from public records and published rates. Every input, rate, and source behind the number is on this page.
Calculation
- 披露的工资和记录的后端，每个都有一个引用
- 未公开的角色是根据其时代、预算范围和职业阶段的已公开可比角色建模的
- 根据披露的中位数估算后端、背书和生产积分
Fast Facts
| Birthdate | August 15, 1990 |
|---|---|
| Birthplace | Indian Hills |
| Breakthrough | Winter's Bone (2010) |
| Best Known | The Hunger Games (2012) |
Who Is Jennifer Lawrence?
Jennifer Lawrence was born August 15, 1990 in Indian Hills, best known for The Hunger Games (2012). The earnings behind Jennifer's net worth come from film salaries, backend participation, and endorsement deals.
The model tracks Jennifer's earning years from 2005 to 2026, with the biggest single year in 2014 at about $52.7 Million of gross income. After representation fees, taxes, and living costs, what stays invested compounds at market returns into an estimated $150.7 Million today.
Data
下面的每一行都是根据公共数据和我们网站上发布的费率表计算得出的 方法页。信心： C级。记录的数字仅占该数字的一小部分，因此大部分数据是根据已发布的比率和可比数据建模的（等级从 A（主要记录在案）到 C（主要建模））。
The Calculation
| Line | Amount |
|---|---|
| Revenue | |
| Film pay with a disclosed figure (2 of 36 films) 每部电影的薪水和引用报道的后端 | $45,000,000 |
| Film pay, modeled lead roles (20 of 36 films) era and budget-band medians of disclosed lead salaries (winsorized, thin cells shrunk toward the era median), blended with this actor's disclosed quote history when available; soft breakthrough blend near the career break year | $269,806,286 |
| Film pay, modeled post-breakthrough supporting roles (3 of 36 films) 12.0% of lead cells: lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio | $8,259,563 |
| Film pay, modeled supporting and early roles (11 of 36 films) 时代中位数的 2.5%：成名前的比率 | $14,131,066 |
| 后端点，估计 12% of disclosed lead deals included points, at a median 2.6% of box office; expected value on 19 commercially viable undisclosed lead roles; cash spread over 3 years; 4 film(s) used band-specific box-office/budget multiples as a gross proxy | $18,245,328 |
| 预计认可度（3 个品牌合作伙伴） 3 named partnerships x the $5.0M annual fee from the median disclosed film deal, scaled 1.25x to this actor's quote vs era median x a 4-year term, spread across the deal years | $60,000,000 |
| 残差，估计 SAG residual rates on post-theatrical receipts assumed at half of box office, split by role share and spread over the ten years after each release; 12 film(s) used band-specific box-office proxies | $42,470,869 |
| TV: Monk Mascot; guest default per credited year; cable network family; priced from tv_episode_rates.csv (en.wikipedia.org) | $30,000 |
| TV: Cold Case credited role; guest default per credited year; broadcast network family; priced from tv_episode_rates.csv (en.wikipedia.org) | $30,000 |
| TV: Medium Young Allison / Claire Chase; stated episode count; broadcast network family; priced from tv_episode_rates.csv (en.wikipedia.org) | $30,000 |
| TV: The Bill Engvall Show credited role; series episode total for a full-run credit; cable network family; priced from tv_episode_rates.csv (en.wikipedia.org) | $6,000,000 |
| TV: Saturday Night Live Herself (host); guest default per credited year; variety format tier; priced from tv_episode_rates.csv (en.wikipedia.org) | $30,000 |
| TV: Jimmy Kimmel Live! Herself (host); guest default per credited year; talk format tier; priced from tv_episode_rates.csv (en.wikipedia.org) | $10,000 |
| 储蓄投资回报 mixed portfolio: 55% actual 60/40 securities returns (taxed) + 45% US long-run home-price rate on the rest | $55,525,365 |
| Expenses | |
| 代表费 代理人10%+律师5% | -$68,959,097 |
| Taxes 美国-纽约有效利率，逐年 | -$178,574,975 |
| 个人消费 measured household savings rates by income, times a 88% entertainment-household factor | -$116,990,771 |
| 估计净资产 | $150,727,833 |
电影接电影
| Film | Year | Role | Budget | 票房 | 工资已计算 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| The Hunger Games: Sunrise on the Reaping no disclosed fee: modeled on the $23.8M shrunk median for 2020s/large (n=2); blended 75% with this actor's disclosed quote history ($25.0M personal, n=1); cap raised to similar-budget personal max within 50% of budget ($25.0M) | 2026 | Lead | $70,000,000 | – | $24,685,370 |
| What Happens at Night no disclosed fee: modeled on the $23.8M shrunk median for 2020s/large (n=2); blended 75% with this actor's disclosed quote history ($25.0M personal, n=1); cap raised to similar-budget personal max within 50% of budget ($25.0M) | 2026 | Lead | $70,000,000 | – | $24,685,370 |
| Die My Love no disclosed fee: modeled on the $25.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid); personal blend cut to 24% on a smaller-than-usual budget; blended 24% with this actor's disclosed quote history ($25.0M personal, n=1); cap raised to similar-budget personal max within 50% of budget ($6.1M), capped at $6.1M | 2025 | Lead | $12,200,000 | $12,200,000 | $6,099,057 |
| Zurawski v Texas no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $23.8M shrunk median for 2020s/large (n=2) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio) | 2024 | Supporting | $70,000,000 | – | $2,999,193 |
| Bread and Roses no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $23.8M shrunk median for 2020s/large (n=2) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio) | 2023 | Supporting | $70,000,000 | – | $2,998,429 |
| No Hard Feelings no disclosed fee: modeled on the $21.7M shrunk median for 2020s/mid (n=1); personal blend cut to 73% on a smaller-than-usual budget; blended 73% with this actor's disclosed quote history ($25.0M personal, n=2); cap raised to similar-budget personal max within 50% of budget ($22.5M), capped at $22.5M | 2023 | Lead | $45,000,000 | $87,300,000 | $22,485,662 |
| Causeway no disclosed fee: modeled on the $23.8M shrunk median for 2020s/large (n=2); blended 75% with this actor's disclosed quote history ($25.0M personal, n=2); cap raised to similar-budget personal max within 50% of budget ($25.0M) | 2022 | Lead | $70,000,000 | – | $24,656,876 |
| Don't Look Up disclosed: Variety: $25M streaming salary | 2021 | Lead | $75,000,000 | $1,172,913 | $25,000,000 |
| Dark Phoenix no disclosed fee: modeled on the $15.8M shrunk median for 2010s/blockbuster (n=11); blended 75% with this actor's disclosed quote history ($20.0M personal, n=1) | 2019 | Lead | $200,000,000 | $244,676,878 | $18,769,515 |
| Red Sparrow no disclosed fee: modeled on the $20.0M shrunk median for 2010s/large (n=8); blended 75% with this actor's disclosed quote history ($20.0M personal, n=1); cap raised to similar-budget personal max within 50% of budget ($20.0M) | 2018 | Lead | $69,000,000 | $151,572,634 | $19,649,269 |
| Mother! no disclosed fee: modeled on the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3); personal blend cut to 41% on a smaller-than-usual budget; blended 41% with this actor's disclosed quote history ($20.0M personal, n=1); cap raised to similar-budget personal max within 50% of budget ($15.0M) | 2017 | Lead | $30,000,000 | $44,500,000 | $14,185,573 |
| A Beautiful Planet no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio) | 2016 | Supporting | $40,000,000 | $25,700,000 | $2,261,941 |
| Passengers disclosed: reported $20M, widely covered at the time | 2016 | Lead | $110,000,000 | $303,144,152 | $20,000,000 |
| X-Men: Apocalypse no disclosed fee: modeled on the $20.0M shrunk median for 2010s/tentpole (n=12); blended 75% with this actor's disclosed quote history ($20.0M personal, n=1) | 2016 | Lead | $178,000,000 | $543,934,105 | $18,733,101 |
| Joy no disclosed fee: modeled on the $20.0M shrunk median for 2010s/large (n=8); blended 75% with this actor's disclosed quote history ($20.0M personal, n=1); cap raised to similar-budget personal max within 50% of budget ($20.0M) | 2015 | Lead | $60,000,000 | $101,100,000 | $17,675,543 |
| The Hunger Games: Mockingjay – Part 2 no disclosed fee: modeled on the $20.0M shrunk median for 2010s/tentpole (n=12); blended 75% with this actor's disclosed quote history ($20.0M personal, n=1) | 2015 | Lead | $160,000,000 | $661,456,563 | $17,675,543 |
| Serena soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.79): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3), capped at $4.1M vs early terms | 2014 | Lead | $27,500,000 | $5,000,000 | $3,321,857 |
| The Hunger Games: Mockingjay – Part 1 soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.79): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $20.0M shrunk median for 2010s/tentpole (n=12), capped at $18.8M vs early terms | 2014 | Lead | $125,000,000 | $755,356,711 | $14,942,894 |
| X-Men: Days of Future Past soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.79): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $15.8M shrunk median for 2010s/blockbuster (n=11) vs early terms | 2014 | Lead | $210,000,000 | $746,045,700 | $12,561,875 |
| American Hustle soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.66): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3), capped at $6.0M vs early terms | 2013 | Lead | $40,000,000 | $251,000,000 | $4,057,830 |
| The Devil You Know soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.66): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3), capped at $6.0M vs early terms | 2013 | Lead | $40,000,000 | – | $4,057,830 |
| The Hunger Games: Catching Fire soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.66): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $20.0M shrunk median for 2010s/tentpole (n=12), capped at $19.5M vs early terms | 2013 | Lead | $130,000,000 | $865,011,746 | $13,054,371 |
| House at the End of the Street soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.50): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $5.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid), capped at $1.3M vs early terms | 2012 | Lead | $8,450,000 | $44,300,000 | $696,250 |
| Silver Linings Playbook soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.50): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3), capped at $3.1M vs early terms | 2012 | Lead | $21,000,000 | $236,412,453 | $1,712,500 |
| The Hunger Games (film) soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.50): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $20.0M shrunk median for 2010s/large (n=8), capped at $11.7M vs early terms | 2012 | Lead | $78,000,000 | $695,220,619 | $6,100,000 |
| Like Crazy soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.34): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $5.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid), capped at $0.0M vs early terms | 2011 | Lead | $250,000 | $3,800,000 | $37,500 |
| The Beaver (film) soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.34): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3), capped at $3.1M vs early terms | 2011 | Lead | $21,000,000 | $7,300,000 | $1,250,325 |
| X-Men: First Class soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.34): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $20.0M shrunk median for 2010s/tentpole (n=12) vs early terms | 2011 | Lead | $160,000,000 | $353,624,124 | $7,115,251 |
| Parachute (band) soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.21): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3), capped at $6.0M vs early terms | 2010 | Lead | $40,000,000 | – | $1,469,284 |
| Winter's Bone soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.21): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $5.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid), capped at $0.3M vs early terms | 2010 | Lead | $2,000,000 | $16,100,000 | $161,506 |
| Garden Party no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $19.4M shrunk median for 2000s/mid (n=2) (pre-stardom rate); soft-breakthrough weight 0.06 | 2008 | Lead | $40,000,000 | – | $842,721 |
| The Burning Plain no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $19.4M shrunk median for 2000s/mid (n=2) (pre-stardom rate); soft-breakthrough weight 0.06 | 2008 | Lead | $20,000,000 | $5,500,000 | $647,813 |
| Cold Case no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $19.4M shrunk median for 2000s/mid (n=2) (pre-stardom rate); soft-breakthrough weight 0.03 | 2007 | Lead | $40,000,000 | – | $674,362 |
| Medium no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $19.4M shrunk median for 2000s/mid (n=2) (pre-stardom rate); soft-breakthrough weight 0.03 | 2007 | Lead | $40,000,000 | – | $674,362 |
| The Bill Engvall Show no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $19.4M shrunk median for 2000s/mid (n=2) (pre-stardom rate); soft-breakthrough weight 0.03 | 2007 | Lead | $40,000,000 | – | $674,362 |
| Monk no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $19.4M shrunk median for 2000s/mid (n=2) (pre-stardom rate); soft-breakthrough weight 0.02 | 2006 | Lead | $40,000,000 | – | $583,580 |
建模人物如何工作。 An undisclosed lead role after the breakthrough gets the median of disclosed lead salaries for its era and budget band, capped at 15% of the film’s budget. Supporting and pre-breakthrough roles get 2.5% of that median, the documented going rate for actors before stardom. Films with no reported budget are treated as small productions. Undocumented backend, endorsements, and producer or director credits enter as separate estimated lines in the calculation above, built from disclosed medians. Every median comes from the published tables on our 方法页.
净资产 Over Time
每年年底的余额模型，与下表相匹配。
逐年
| Year | Income | 代表费 | 税率 | Spent | Saved | Balance |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | $35,835,801 | $5,375,370 | 45% | $9,234,384 | $7,518,853 | $150,727,833 |
| 2025 | $20,587,655 | $3,088,148 | 45% | $5,305,150 | $4,319,578 | $140,366,557 |
| 2024 | $6,449,170 | $967,376 | 45% | $1,661,861 | $1,353,126 | $126,810,011 |
| 2023 | $21,889,763 | $3,283,464 | 45% | $5,640,685 | $4,592,779 | $116,167,708 |
| 2022 | $28,458,311 | $4,268,747 | 45% | $7,333,308 | $5,970,952 | $102,408,216 |
| 2021 | $36,264,082 | $5,439,612 | 45% | $9,344,746 | $7,608,712 | $103,488,450 |
| 2020 | $4,072,848 | $610,927 | 45% | $1,049,516 | $854,541 | $88,433,749 |
| 2019 | $17,111,605 | $2,566,741 | 45% | $4,409,421 | $3,590,254 | $81,521,811 |
| 2018 | $23,618,573 | $3,542,786 | 45% | $6,086,176 | $4,955,507 | $70,436,227 |
| 2017 | $20,789,825 | $3,118,474 | 47% | $5,162,438 | $4,203,378 | $65,100,532 |
| 2016 | $44,929,497 | $6,739,425 | 47% | $11,156,695 | $9,084,043 | $56,589,899 |
| 2015 | $52,224,055 | $7,833,608 | 47% | $12,968,047 | $10,558,889 | $45,158,773 |
| 2014 | $52,686,802 | $7,903,020 | 47% | $13,082,955 | $10,652,449 | $33,779,300 |
| 2013 | $42,362,484 | $6,354,373 | 47% | $10,519,266 | $8,565,033 | $21,795,988 |
| 2012 | $28,782,099 | $4,317,315 | 43% | $7,686,444 | $6,258,483 | $12,116,531 |
| 2011 | $8,696,661 | $1,304,499 | 43% | $2,322,499 | $1,891,033 | $5,491,336 |
| 2010 | $3,873,287 | $580,993 | 43% | $1,034,386 | $842,221 | $3,467,164 |
| 2009 | $2,700,048 | $405,007 | 43% | $721,065 | $587,108 | $2,457,106 |
| 2008 | $3,224,408 | $483,661 | 43% | $861,099 | $701,127 | $1,706,933 |
| 2007 | $3,949,829 | $592,474 | 43% | $1,054,827 | $858,865 | $1,105,646 |
| 2006 | $1,045,432 | $156,815 | 43% | $279,189 | $227,322 | $236,079 |
| 2005 | $175,074 | $26,261 | 43% | $76,612 | $8,211 | $8,211 |
Model Notes
- RESIDENCE PROXY: public New York base in recent years
- salary comps: 2 disclosed lead fee(s) flagged as non-market outliers (scale / far-below-quote) and excluded from era medians
- 图片来源： Wikimedia Commons via Wikipedia (Jennifer Lawrence)
方法论
We rebuild Jennifer’s career as a yearly time series. Disclosed salaries and documented backend enter as reported, with citations. Undisclosed lead roles get the median of disclosed salaries for their era and budget band, capped at 15% of the film’s budget. Supporting roles and roles from before the breakthrough get 2.5% of that median, the going-rate ratio measured from disclosed pre-stardom deals. Films with no reported budget are treated as small productions, and every role is estimated unless a source documents it was unpaid. Representation fees come out at sourced rates, taxes follow the eras actually lived through, spending follows measured household savings behavior unless court documents say otherwise, and what remains compounds at real market returns. Undocumented backend enters as an expected value from disclosed deals, endorsements at the median disclosed ambassador fee, and producer or director credits at union-scale floors.
完整的模型、每个费率表以及我们的估算如何与实际交易进行核对的信息均位于 方法页.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is Jennifer Lawrence's net worth in 2026?
As of 2026, Jennifer Lawrence's net worth is an estimated $150.7 Million. The estimate is built film by film from disclosed salaries and documented backend, then year by year: income, minus representation fees and taxes, minus spending, compounded at real market returns.
How does Jennifer Lawrence make money?
电影工资和记录的后端参与。
How is Jennifer Lawrence's net worth calculated?
披露的发薪日按报告输入，并附有引文。未公开的主角使用其时代和预算范围内公开的工资中位数，上限为电影预算的 15%，而配角或早期职业角色则使用记录在案的成名前中位数的比例。我们减去来源代表费、詹妮弗实际工作年份的税收以及衡量储蓄行为的支出，然后根据实际市场回报进行复利。未记录的后端、背书和制作积分作为已披露中位数的估计线输入。每个费率和来源均已公布。
How much does Jennifer Lawrence make per film?
它因角色和时代而异，上面的逐部电影表格列出了每部电影的片酬。披露的发薪日按报告输入。未公开的角色是根据同等演员在同一时代和预算范围内的收入来建模的，突破后的主角收入最高，配角或早期角色只占其中的一小部分。
为什么税率那么高，演员不跟外贷公司避税吗？
税收按照詹妮弗每年居住地的实际税率计算，即逐年表格中显示的税率。在像加利福尼亚州这样的高税收州，联邦和州所得税合计接近高收入者收入的一半，因此那些年的税率为百分之四十左右。贷款公司，即许多演员的收入来源公司，不会降低他们带回家的钱的税收。它的真正优势是扣除代理费、经理费和律师费等业务成本，并且该模型在征收任何税款之前已经将这些费用作为单独的行扣除。高收入员工也不属于其他公司所有者可以申请的转嫁业务扣除范围，因此他们不会享受降息。
为什么这个数字与其他净值网站不同？
Most sites publish a single number with no way to check it. This estimate is built in the open: every salary, rate, and assumption is on the page, and the 方法页 lists every source.
这个估计有多准确？
对于个人的净资产没有准确的估计；这是根据公共数据构建的模型。不同之处在于您可以看到它是如何构建的并检查每一步。计算顶部附近的置信度显示了该数字有多少是基于披露的数字，以及数字依赖于假设的页面标记。
Is Jennifer Lawrence rich compared to the average person?
Yes. A net worth of $150.7 Million is far above the median American household, which sits near $193,000 according to Federal Reserve data.
What is Jennifer Lawrence's biggest source of wealth?
On this page it is film salaries, the largest line in the calculation at $269.8 Million. The full breakdown, with every other line and its source, is above.
How much does Jennifer Lawrence make from endorsements?
The model counts $60.0 Million in career endorsement income for Jennifer: 3 named partnerships x the $5.0M annual fee from the median disclosed film deal, scaled 1.25x to this actor's quote vs era median x a 4-year term, spread across the deal years. It is an estimate, since the individual deal values are not all public, and it sits as its own line in the calculation above.
探索其他演员
关于NetWorth Explained
We originally created NWE because nobody in the public-figure net worth space showed their work. Magazines and sites threw out big numbers while hiding behind vague claims of “proprietary algorithms” 或者 “insider knowledge.” That’s why we started the world’s only publication that transparently showed every assumption, every variable, and every calculation. We’re still the only ones who do it this way. 了解更多关于NetWorth Explained的信息.