Rachel McAdams 净资产 2026
最近更新 August 3, 2026
As of 2026, Rachel McAdams has an estimated net worth of $97.6 Million, computed film by film and year by year from public records and published rates. Every input, rate, and source behind the number is on this page.
Calculation
- 披露的工资和记录的后端，每个都有一个引用
- 未公开的角色是根据其时代、预算范围和职业阶段的已公开可比角色建模的
- 根据披露的中位数估算后端、背书和生产积分
Fast Facts
| Birthdate | 不适用 |
|---|---|
| Birthplace | 不适用 |
| Breakthrough | career breakthrough modeled at 2004 |
| Best Known | The Notebook (2004) |
Who Is Rachel McAdams?
Rachel McAdams is best known for The Notebook (2004). The earnings behind Rachel's net worth come from film salaries, backend participation, and endorsement deals.
The model tracks Rachel's earning years from 2000 to 2026, with the biggest single year in 2015 at about $27.4 Million of gross income. After representation fees, taxes, and living costs, what stays invested compounds at market returns into an estimated $97.6 Million today.
Data
下面的每一行都是根据公共数据和我们网站上发布的费率表计算得出的 方法页。信心： C级。记录的数字仅占该数字的一小部分，因此大部分数据是根据已发布的比率和可比数据建模的（等级从 A（主要记录在案）到 C（主要建模））。
The Calculation
| Line | Amount |
|---|---|
| Revenue | |
| Film pay, modeled lead roles (32 of 43 films) era and budget-band medians of disclosed lead salaries (winsorized, thin cells shrunk toward the era median), blended with this actor's disclosed quote history when available; soft breakthrough blend near the career break year | $158,818,481 |
| Film pay, modeled post-breakthrough supporting roles (5 of 43 films) 12.0% of lead cells: lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio | $9,198,079 |
| Film pay, modeled supporting and early roles (6 of 43 films) 时代中位数的 2.5%：成名前的比率 | $6,204,876 |
| 后端点，估计 12% of disclosed lead deals included points, at a median 2.6% of box office; expected value on 23 commercially viable undisclosed lead roles; cash spread over 3 years | $13,852,811 |
| 预计认可度（1 个品牌合作伙伴） 1 named partnerships x the $4.0M annual fee from the median disclosed film deal x a 4-year term, spread across the deal years | $16,000,000 |
| 残差，估计 SAG residual rates on post-theatrical receipts assumed at half of box office, split by role share and spread over the ten years after each release | $27,777,237 |
| TV: Shotgun Love Dolls Beth Swanson; guest default per credited year; network not identified, priced on the broadcast cell; priced from tv_episode_rates.csv (en.wikipedia.org) | $30,000 |
| TV: The Famous Jett Jackson Hannah Grant; guest default per credited year; cable network family; priced from tv_episode_rates.csv (en.wikipedia.org) | $30,000 |
| TV: Earth: Final Conflict Christine Bickwell; guest default per credited year; network not identified, priced on the broadcast cell; priced from tv_episode_rates.csv (en.wikipedia.org) | $30,000 |
| TV: Guilt by Association Danielle Mason; one engagement for a television film or special; network not identified, priced on the broadcast cell; priced from tv_episode_rates.csv (en.wikipedia.org) | $75,000 |
| TV: Slings & Arrows Kate McNab; stated episode count; network not identified, priced on the broadcast cell; priced from tv_episode_rates.csv (en.wikipedia.org) | $524,250 |
| TV: Who Do You Think You Are? Herself; guest default per credited year; network not identified, priced on the broadcast cell; priced from tv_episode_rates.csv (en.wikipedia.org) | $30,000 |
| TV: True Detective Antigone "Ani" Bezzerides; series episode total for a full-run credit; cable network family; priced from tv_episode_rates.csv (en.wikipedia.org) | $6,000,000 |
| TV: Explained Narrator; guest default per credited year; streaming network family; priced from tv_episode_rates.csv (en.wikipedia.org) | $30,000 |
| TV: What If...? Christine Palmer (voice); guest default per credited year; animation format tier; priced from tv_episode_rates.csv (en.wikipedia.org) | $24,000 |
| TV: Dave Herself; stated episode count; network not identified, priced on the broadcast cell; priced from tv_episode_rates.csv (en.wikipedia.org) | $45,000 |
| TV: Saturday Night Live Herself; guest default per credited year; variety format tier; priced from tv_episode_rates.csv (en.wikipedia.org) | $30,000 |
| 储蓄投资回报 mixed portfolio: 55% actual 60/40 securities returns (taxed) + 45% US long-run home-price rate on the rest | $48,236,851 |
| Expenses | |
| 代表费 代理人10%+律师5% | -$35,138,187 |
| Taxes 美国-加拿大有效利率，逐年 | -$88,991,550 |
| 个人消费 measured household savings rates by income, times a 88% entertainment-household factor | -$60,726,021 |
| 估计净资产 | $97,635,672 |
电影接电影
| Film | Year | Role | Budget | 票房 | 工资已计算 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Send Help no disclosed fee: modeled on the $21.7M shrunk median for 2020s/mid (n=1), capped at $6.0M | 2026 | Lead | $40,000,000 | $94,000,000 | $5,999,998 |
| TBA no disclosed fee: modeled on the $25.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid); budget unreported, small-film terms | 2026 | Lead | – | – | $2,999,999 |
| Mary Jane no disclosed fee: modeled on the $25.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid); budget unreported, small-film terms | 2024 | Lead | – | – | $2,999,996 |
| Are You There God? It's Me, Margaret. no disclosed fee: modeled on the $21.7M shrunk median for 2020s/mid (n=1), capped at $4.5M | 2023 | Lead | $30,000,000 | $21,500,000 | $4,499,988 |
| Dave no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $21.7M shrunk median for 2020s/mid (n=1) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio) | 2023 | Supporting | $28,000,000 | $92,000,000 | $2,599,994 |
| Lil Dicky discography no disclosed fee: modeled on the $25.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid); budget unreported, small-film terms | 2023 | Lead | – | – | $2,999,993 |
| Doctor Strange in the Multiverse of Madness no disclosed fee: modeled on the $18.0M shrunk median for 2020s/blockbuster (n=8) | 2022 | Lead | $200,000,000 | $955,775,804 | $17,999,892 |
| What If...? no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $25.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio); budget unreported, small-film terms | 2021 | Supporting | – | – | $2,999,972 |
| Explained no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $5.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio); budget unreported, small-film terms | 2018 | Supporting | – | – | $599,958 |
| Game Night no disclosed fee: modeled on the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3), capped at $5.5M | 2018 | Lead | $37,000,000 | $85,500,000 | $5,549,534 |
| Disobedience no disclosed fee: modeled on the $5.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid), capped at $0.9M | 2017 | Lead | $6,000,000 | $8,000,000 | $899,867 |
| Doctor Strange no disclosed fee: modeled on the $20.0M shrunk median for 2010s/tentpole (n=12) | 2016 | Lead | $165,000,000 | $677,718,395 | $19,993,461 |
| Aloha no disclosed fee: modeled on the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3), capped at $6.7M | 2015 | Lead | $44,500,000 | $26,300,000 | $6,670,821 |
| Every Thing Will Be Fine no disclosed fee: modeled on the $5.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid), capped at $0.1M | 2015 | Lead | $473,965 | $473,965 | $71,095 |
| Southpaw no disclosed fee: modeled on the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3), capped at $4.5M | 2015 | Lead | $30,000,000 | $94,200,000 | $4,497,241 |
| Spotlight no disclosed fee: modeled on the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3), capped at $3.0M | 2015 | Lead | $20,000,000 | $88,346,473 | $2,998,221 |
| The Little Prince no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $20.0M shrunk median for 2010s/large (n=8) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio) | 2015 | Supporting | $77,500,000 | $97,571,250 | $2,398,759 |
| True Detective no disclosed fee: modeled on the $5.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid); budget unreported, small-film terms | 2015 | Lead | – | – | $2,998,123 |
| A Most Wanted Man no disclosed fee: modeled on the $5.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid), capped at $2.2M | 2014 | Lead | $15,000,000 | $36,200,000 | $2,247,299 |
| Who Do You Think You Are? no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $5.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio); budget unreported, small-film terms | 2014 | Supporting | – | – | $599,396 |
| About Time no disclosed fee: modeled on the $5.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid), capped at $1.8M | 2013 | Lead | $12,000,000 | $88,500,000 | $1,795,858 |
| Passion no disclosed fee: modeled on the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3), capped at $3.8M | 2012 | Lead | $25,000,000 | $1,300,000 | $3,733,303 |
| The Vow (2012 film) no disclosed fee: modeled on the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3), capped at $4.5M | 2012 | Lead | $30,000,000 | $196,100,000 | $4,479,700 |
| To the Wonder no disclosed fee: modeled on the $5.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid), capped at $0.4M | 2012 | Lead | $2,700,000 | $2,700,000 | $403,655 |
| Midnight in Paris no disclosed fee: modeled on the $5.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid), capped at $2.5M | 2011 | Lead | $17,000,000 | $151,100,000 | $2,527,409 |
| Sherlock Holmes: A Game of Shadows no disclosed fee: modeled on the $20.0M shrunk median for 2010s/tentpole (n=12), capped at $18.8M | 2011 | Lead | $125,000,000 | $543,848,418 | $18,579,984 |
| Morning Glory no disclosed fee: modeled on the $5.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid), capped at $0.0M | 2010 | Lead | $239,000 | $60,000,000 | $35,850 |
| Sherlock Holmes no disclosed fee: modeled on the $20.0M shrunk median for 2000s/large (n=18), capped at $13.5M | 2009 | Lead | $90,000,000 | $524,028,679 | $13,052,212 |
| State of Play no disclosed fee: modeled on the $20.0M shrunk median for 2000s/large (n=18), capped at $9.0M | 2009 | Lead | $60,000,000 | $88,800,000 | $8,707,216 |
| The Time Traveler's Wife (film) no disclosed fee: modeled on the $19.4M shrunk median for 2000s/mid (n=2), capped at $5.8M | 2009 | Lead | $39,000,000 | $101,300,000 | $5,665,180 |
| The Lucky Ones (film) no disclosed fee: modeled on the $18.8M median for its era and nearest band (mid), capped at $2.1M | 2008 | Lead | $14,000,000 | $266,967 | $1,994,019 |
| Married Life no disclosed fee: modeled on the $18.8M median for its era and nearest band (mid), capped at $1.8M | 2007 | Lead | $12,000,000 | $2,800,000 | $1,641,311 |
| Red Eye soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.66): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $19.4M shrunk median for 2000s/mid (n=2), capped at $3.9M vs early terms | 2005 | Lead | $26,000,000 | $96,200,000 | $2,741,271 |
| The Family Stone soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.66): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $18.8M median for its era and nearest band (mid), capped at $2.7M vs early terms | 2005 | Lead | $18,000,000 | $92,900,000 | $1,943,063 |
| Wedding Crashers soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.66): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $19.4M shrunk median for 2000s/mid (n=2), capped at $6.0M vs early terms | 2005 | Lead | $40,000,000 | $288,500,000 | $4,128,859 |
| Mean Girls soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.50): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $18.8M median for its era and nearest band (mid), capped at $2.6M vs early terms | 2004 | Lead | $17,500,000 | $130,100,000 | $1,546,875 |
| The Notebook soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.50): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $19.4M shrunk median for 2000s/mid (n=2), capped at $4.3M vs early terms | 2004 | Lead | $29,000,000 | $118,300,000 | $2,417,188 |
| Earth: Final Conflict soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.21): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $18.8M median for its era and nearest band (mid); budget unreported, small-film terms vs early terms | 2002 | Lead | – | – | $996,790 |
| My Name Is Tanino soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.21): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $18.8M median for its era and nearest band (mid); budget unreported, small-film terms vs early terms | 2002 | Lead | – | $987,204 | $996,790 |
| Perfect Pie soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.21): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $18.8M median for its era and nearest band (mid); budget unreported, small-film terms vs early terms | 2002 | Lead | – | – | $996,790 |
| Slings & Arrows soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.21): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $18.8M median for its era and nearest band (mid); budget unreported, small-film terms vs early terms | 2002 | Lead | – | – | $996,790 |
| The Hot Chick soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.21): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $19.4M shrunk median for 2000s/mid (n=2), capped at $5.1M vs early terms | 2002 | Lead | $34,000,000 | $54,600,000 | $1,447,234 |
| The Famous Jett Jackson no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $18.8M median for its era and nearest band (mid) (pre-stardom rate); budget unreported, small-film terms; soft-breakthrough weight 0.12 | 2001 | Lead | – | – | $770,482 |
建模人物如何工作。 An undisclosed lead role after the breakthrough gets the median of disclosed lead salaries for its era and budget band, capped at 15% of the film’s budget. Supporting and pre-breakthrough roles get 2.5% of that median, the documented going rate for actors before stardom. Films with no reported budget are treated as small productions. Undocumented backend, endorsements, and producer or director credits enter as separate estimated lines in the calculation above, built from disclosed medians. Every median comes from the published tables on our 方法页.
净资产 Over Time
每年年底的余额模型，与下表相匹配。
逐年
| Year | Income | 代表费 | 税率 | Spent | Saved | Balance |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | $7,447,826 | $1,117,174 | 45% | $1,919,200 | $1,562,658 | $97,635,672 |
| 2025 | $3,890,239 | $583,536 | 45% | $1,002,460 | $816,227 | $94,166,149 |
| 2024 | $4,317,595 | $647,639 | 45% | $1,112,584 | $905,892 | $87,011,890 |
| 2023 | $10,229,128 | $1,534,369 | 45% | $2,635,903 | $2,146,214 | $79,730,470 |
| 2022 | $17,395,193 | $2,609,279 | 45% | $4,482,498 | $3,649,755 | $71,210,130 |
| 2021 | $8,726,169 | $1,308,925 | 45% | $2,248,611 | $1,830,872 | $72,500,175 |
| 2020 | $2,225,149 | $333,772 | 45% | $573,390 | $466,867 | $65,181,148 |
| 2019 | $1,757,518 | $263,628 | 45% | $452,888 | $368,752 | $60,238,331 |
| 2018 | $6,733,489 | $1,010,023 | 45% | $1,735,126 | $1,412,780 | $54,111,421 |
| 2017 | $4,970,080 | $745,512 | 47% | $1,234,148 | $1,004,873 | $52,392,667 |
| 2016 | $16,386,936 | $2,458,040 | 47% | $4,069,132 | $3,313,183 | $47,753,136 |
| 2015 | $27,407,284 | $4,111,093 | 47% | $6,805,656 | $5,541,325 | $42,244,346 |
| 2014 | $9,720,387 | $1,458,058 | 47% | $2,413,724 | $1,965,311 | $35,832,558 |
| 2013 | $4,538,550 | $680,783 | 47% | $1,126,993 | $917,624 | $31,918,315 |
| 2012 | $8,882,920 | $1,332,438 | 43% | $2,372,241 | $1,931,534 | $28,389,548 |
| 2011 | $19,786,029 | $2,967,904 | 43% | $5,283,986 | $4,302,345 | $24,801,753 |
| 2010 | $8,037,982 | $1,205,697 | 43% | $2,146,594 | $1,747,808 | $19,741,340 |
| 2009 | $20,403,197 | $3,060,479 | 43% | $5,448,804 | $4,436,545 | $16,843,047 |
| 2008 | $10,089,122 | $1,513,368 | 43% | $2,694,365 | $2,193,815 | $11,324,645 |
| 2007 | $6,699,020 | $1,004,853 | 43% | $1,789,016 | $1,456,659 | $10,037,188 |
| 2006 | $5,697,908 | $854,686 | 43% | $1,521,663 | $1,238,974 | $8,208,441 |
| 2005 | $11,265,805 | $1,689,871 | 43% | $3,008,605 | $2,449,677 | $6,534,950 |
| 2004 | $9,880,189 | $1,482,028 | 43% | $2,638,568 | $2,148,384 | $3,941,716 |
| 2003 | $1,396,988 | $209,548 | 43% | $373,074 | $303,766 | $1,700,933 |
| 2002 | $3,909,077 | $586,361 | 46% | $988,999 | $805,267 | $1,272,458 |
| 2001 | $2,229,656 | $334,448 | 46% | $564,105 | $459,307 | $481,705 |
| 2000 | $231,145 | $34,672 | 46% | $83,688 | $22,407 | $22,407 |
Model Notes
- 住宅代理：该批次住宅并非单独采购；美国-加拿大默认适用直至记录
- salary comps: 2 disclosed lead fee(s) flagged as non-market outliers (scale / far-below-quote) and excluded from era medians
- 图片来源： Wikimedia Commons via Wikipedia (Rachel McAdams)
方法论
We rebuild Rachel’s career as a yearly time series. Disclosed salaries and documented backend enter as reported, with citations. Undisclosed lead roles get the median of disclosed salaries for their era and budget band, capped at 15% of the film’s budget. Supporting roles and roles from before the breakthrough get 2.5% of that median, the going-rate ratio measured from disclosed pre-stardom deals. Films with no reported budget are treated as small productions, and every role is estimated unless a source documents it was unpaid. Representation fees come out at sourced rates, taxes follow the eras actually lived through, spending follows measured household savings behavior unless court documents say otherwise, and what remains compounds at real market returns. Undocumented backend enters as an expected value from disclosed deals, endorsements at the median disclosed ambassador fee, and producer or director credits at union-scale floors.
完整的模型、每个费率表以及我们的估算如何与实际交易进行核对的信息均位于 方法页.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is Rachel McAdams's net worth in 2026?
As of 2026, Rachel McAdams's net worth is an estimated $97.6 Million. The estimate is built film by film from disclosed salaries and documented backend, then year by year: income, minus representation fees and taxes, minus spending, compounded at real market returns.
How does Rachel McAdams make money?
电影工资和记录的后端参与。
How is Rachel McAdams's net worth calculated?
Disclosed paydays enter as reported, with citations. Undisclosed lead roles use the median of disclosed salaries for their era and budget band, capped at 15% of the film's budget, and supporting or early-career roles use the documented pre-stardom fraction of that median. We subtract sourced representation fees, taxes for the years Rachel actually worked, and spending from measured savings behavior, then compound at real market returns. Undocumented backend, endorsements, and producing credits enter as estimated lines from disclosed medians. Every rate and source is published.
How much does Rachel McAdams make per film?
它因角色和时代而异，上面的逐部电影表格列出了每部电影的片酬。披露的发薪日按报告输入。未公开的角色是根据同等演员在同一时代和预算范围内的收入来建模的，突破后的主角收入最高，配角或早期角色只占其中的一小部分。
为什么税率那么高，演员不跟外贷公司避税吗？
Tax comes out at the effective rate for where Rachel lived each year, which is the rate shown in the year-by-year table. In a high-tax state like California, combined federal and state income tax reaches close to half of a top earner's income, so those years run in the mid-40s percent. A loan-out company, the corporation many actors run their income through, does not lower the tax on the money they take home. Its real advantage is deducting business costs such as agent, manager, and attorney fees, and the model already subtracts those as a separate line before any tax is applied. High-earning performers also fall outside the pass-through business deduction that other company owners can claim, so it buys them no rate cut.
为什么这个数字与其他净值网站不同？
Most sites publish a single number with no way to check it. This estimate is built in the open: every salary, rate, and assumption is on the page, and the 方法页 lists every source.
这个估计有多准确？
对于个人的净资产没有准确的估计；这是根据公共数据构建的模型。不同之处在于您可以看到它是如何构建的并检查每一步。计算顶部附近的置信度显示了该数字有多少是基于披露的数字，以及数字依赖于假设的页面标记。
Is Rachel McAdams rich compared to the average person?
Yes. A net worth of $97.6 Million is far above the median American household, which sits near $193,000 according to Federal Reserve data.
What is Rachel McAdams's biggest source of wealth?
On this page it is film salaries, the largest line in the calculation at $158.8 Million. The full breakdown, with every other line and its source, is above.
How much does Rachel McAdams make from endorsements?
The model counts $16.0 Million in career endorsement income for Rachel: 1 named partnerships x the $4.0M annual fee from the median disclosed film deal x a 4-year term, spread across the deal years. It is an estimate, since the individual deal values are not all public, and it sits as its own line in the calculation above.
探索其他演员
关于NetWorth Explained
We originally created NWE because nobody in the public-figure net worth space showed their work. Magazines and sites threw out big numbers while hiding behind vague claims of “proprietary algorithms” 或者 “insider knowledge.” That’s why we started the world’s only publication that transparently showed every assumption, every variable, and every calculation. We’re still the only ones who do it this way. 了解更多关于NetWorth Explained的信息.