$194.9 Million

Rupert Grint 净资产 2026

最近更新 August 3, 2026

As of 2026, Rupert Grint has an estimated net worth of $194.9 Million, computed film by film and year by year from public records and published rates. Every input, rate, and source behind the number is on this page.

Calculation

  • 披露的工资和记录的后端,每个都有一个引用
  • 未公开的角色是根据其时代、预算范围和职业阶段的已公开可比角色建模的
  • 根据披露的中位数估算后端、背书和生产积分
Rupert Grint

Fast Facts

Birthdate不适用
Birthplace不适用
Breakthroughcareer breakthrough modeled at 2001
Best KnownHarry Potter and the Philosopher's Stone (2001)

Who Is Rupert Grint?

Rupert Grint is best known for Harry Potter and the Philosopher's Stone (2001). The earnings behind Rupert's net worth come from film salaries, backend participation, and endorsement deals.

The model tracks Rupert's earning years from 2000 to 2026, with the biggest single year in 2011 at about $28.3 Million of gross income. After representation fees, taxes, and living costs, what stays invested compounds at market returns into an estimated $194.9 Million today.

Data

下面的每一行都是根据公共数据和我们网站上发布的费率表计算得出的 方法页。信心: C级。记录的数字仅占该数字的一小部分,因此大部分数据是根据已发布的比率和可比数据建模的(等级从 A(主要记录在案)到 C(主要建模))。

The Calculation

Rupert Grint net worth line items
LineAmount
Revenue
Film pay, modeled lead roles (50 of 60 films)
era and budget-band medians of disclosed lead salaries (winsorized, thin cells shrunk toward the era median), blended with this actor's disclosed quote history when available; soft breakthrough blend near the career break year
$218,682,359
Film pay, modeled post-breakthrough supporting roles (10 of 60 films)
12.0% of lead cells: lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio
$12,076,436
后端点,估计
12% of disclosed lead deals included points, at a median 2.6% of box office; expected value on 17 commercially viable undisclosed lead roles; cash spread over 3 years
$30,101,390
预计认可度(1 个品牌合作伙伴)
1 named partnerships x the $4.0M annual fee from the median disclosed film deal x a 4-year term, spread across the deal years
$16,000,000
残差,估计
SAG residual rates on post-theatrical receipts assumed at half of box office, split by role share and spread over the ten years after each release
$58,425,820
TV: Come Fly with Me
Himself; guest default per credited year; network not identified, priced on the broadcast cell; priced from tv_episode_rates.csv (en.wikipedia.org)
$30,000
TV: American Dad!
Liam; guest default per credited year; animation format tier; priced from tv_episode_rates.csv (en.wikipedia.org)
$24,000
TV: Tracey Ullman's Show
Himself; guest default per credited year; variety format tier; priced from tv_episode_rates.csv (en.wikipedia.org)
$30,000
TV: Urban Myths
August "Gustl" Kubizek; guest default per credited year; network not identified, priced on the broadcast cell; priced from tv_episode_rates.csv (en.wikipedia.org)
$30,000
TV: Snatch
Charlie Cavendish-Scott; series episode total for a full-run credit; streaming network family; priced from tv_episode_rates.csv (en.wikipedia.org)
$8,000,000
TV: Sick Note
Daniel Glass; series episode total for a full-run credit; network not identified, priced on the broadcast cell; priced from tv_episode_rates.csv (en.wikipedia.org)
$3,500,000
TV: The ABC Murders
Inspector Crome; one engagement for a television film or special; network not identified, priced on the broadcast cell; priced from tv_episode_rates.csv (en.wikipedia.org)
$75,000
TV: Servant
Julian Pearce; series episode total for a full-run credit; streaming network family; priced from tv_episode_rates.csv (en.wikipedia.org)
$27,200,000
TV: Harry Potter 20th Anniversary: Return to Hogwarts
Himself; guest default per credited year; streaming network family; priced from tv_episode_rates.csv (en.wikipedia.org)
$30,000
TV: Guillermo del Toro's Cabinet of Curiosities
Walter Gilman; guest default per credited year; streaming network family; priced from tv_episode_rates.csv (en.wikipedia.org)
$30,000
储蓄投资回报
mixed portfolio: 55% actual 60/40 securities returns (taxed) + 45% US long-run home-price rate on the rest
$111,700,085
Expenses
代表费
代理人10%+律师5%
-$56,093,626
Taxes
英国有效利率,逐年
-$127,145,553
个人消费
measured household savings rates by income, times a 88% entertainment-household factor
-$105,190,477
Income tax on the Clay 10 payment, after the tribunal ruled against him
he took GBP 4.5M out of Clay 10 in 2011 and treated it as capital; HMRC called it income. The First-tier Tribunal dismissed his appeal in November 2024 and put the bill at GBP 1,801,060 for the 2011/12 year. A separate appeal over the timing of his accounting date had already gone against him in 2019.
-$2,290,000
估计净资产$194,937,937

电影接电影

Rupert Grint film-by-film pay
FilmYearRoleBudget票房工资已计算
Ebenezer: A Christmas Carol
no disclosed fee: modeled on the $25.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid); budget unreported, small-film terms
2026Lead$3,000,000
Nightborn
no disclosed fee: modeled on the $25.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid); budget unreported, small-film terms
2026Lead$3,000,000
A Little More (Ed Sheeran song)
no disclosed fee: modeled on the $25.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid); budget unreported, small-film terms
2025Lead$3,000,000
Knock at the Cabin
no disclosed fee: modeled on the $21.7M shrunk median for 2020s/mid (n=1), capped at $3.0M
2023Lead$20,000,000$54,800,000$2,999,999
Guillermo del Toro's Cabinet of Curiosities
no disclosed fee: modeled on the $25.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid); budget unreported, small-film terms
2022Lead$2,999,998
Harry Potter 20th Anniversary: Return to Hogwarts
no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $25.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio); budget unreported, small-film terms
2022Supporting$2,999,998
Pena De Prata
no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $25.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio); budget unreported, small-film terms
2021Supporting$2,999,996
Saleka
no disclosed fee: modeled on the $25.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid); budget unreported, small-film terms
2021Lead$2,999,996
Servant
no disclosed fee: modeled on the $25.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid); budget unreported, small-film terms
2021Lead$2,999,996
Servant
no disclosed fee: modeled on the $5.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid); budget unreported, small-film terms
2018Lead$2,999,966
The ABC Murders
no disclosed fee: modeled on the $5.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid); budget unreported, small-film terms
2018Lead$2,999,966
Sick Note
no disclosed fee: modeled on the $5.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid); budget unreported, small-film terms
2017Lead$2,999,933
Snatch
no disclosed fee: modeled on the $5.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid), capped at $1.5M
2017Lead$10,000,000$83,557,872$1,499,968
Urban Myths
no disclosed fee: modeled on the $5.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid); budget unreported, small-film terms
2017Lead$2,999,933
Tracey Ullman's Show
no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $5.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio); budget unreported, small-film terms
2016Supporting$599,978
Enemy of Man
no disclosed fee: modeled on the $5.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid); budget unreported, small-film terms
2015Lead$2,999,746
Favorite Breakthrough Performance (Male)
no disclosed fee: modeled on the $5.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid); budget unreported, small-film terms
2015Lead$2,999,746
Favorite Funny Performance
no disclosed fee: modeled on the $5.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid); budget unreported, small-film terms
2015Lead$2,999,746
It's Only a Play
no disclosed fee: modeled on the $5.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid); budget unreported, small-film terms
2015Lead$2,999,746
Moonwalkers
no disclosed fee: modeled on the $5.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid); budget unreported, small-film terms
2015Lead$135,622$2,999,746
Tom Gates
no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $5.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio); budget unreported, small-film terms
2015Supporting$599,958
"Struck by Lightning"
no disclosed fee: modeled on the $5.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid); budget unreported, small-film terms
2014Lead$2,999,505
Harry Potter and the Escape from Gringotts
no disclosed fee: modeled on the $5.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid); budget unreported, small-film terms
2014Lead$2,999,505
Hogwarts Express
no disclosed fee: modeled on the $5.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid); budget unreported, small-film terms
2014Lead$2,999,505
It's Only a Play
no disclosed fee: modeled on the $5.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid); budget unreported, small-film terms
2014Lead$2,999,505
Postman Pat: The Movie
no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $5.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio); budget unreported, small-film terms
2014Supporting$8,600,000$599,918
Underdogs
no disclosed fee: modeled on the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3), capped at $3.1M
2014Lead$21,000,000$32,768,940$3,149,505
CBGB
no disclosed fee: modeled on the $5.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid), capped at $0.8M
2013Lead$5,000,000$40,400$749,790
Charlie Countryman
no disclosed fee: modeled on the $5.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid), capped at $0.1M
2013Lead$424,404$424,404$63,661
Mojo
no disclosed fee: modeled on the $5.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid); budget unreported, small-film terms
2013Lead$2,999,036
美国爸爸!
no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $5.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio); budget unreported, small-film terms
2012Supporting$599,690
Favourite Film Star ( under 25 )
no disclosed fee: modeled on the $5.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid); budget unreported, small-film terms
2012Lead$2,998,123
Holidays at Home are Great
no disclosed fee: modeled on the $5.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid); budget unreported, small-film terms
2012Lead$2,998,123
Into the White
no disclosed fee: modeled on the $5.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid); budget unreported, small-film terms
2012Lead$712,216$2,998,123
National Space Centre (England)
no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $5.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio); budget unreported, small-film terms
2012Supporting$599,690
Over the Rainbow
no disclosed fee: modeled on the $5.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid); budget unreported, small-film terms
2012Lead$2,998,123
Come Fly with Me
no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $5.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio); budget unreported, small-film terms
2011Supporting$599,396
Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows – Part 2
no disclosed fee: modeled on the $15.8M shrunk median for 2010s/blockbuster (n=11)
2011Lead$250,000,000$1,341,511,219$15,749,689
IGN
no disclosed fee: modeled on the $5.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid); budget unreported, small-film terms
2011Lead$2,996,346
Lego House
no disclosed fee: modeled on the $5.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid); budget unreported, small-film terms
2011Lead$2,996,346
Red Nose Day 2011
no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $5.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio); budget unreported, small-film terms
2011Supporting$599,396
Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows – Part 1
no disclosed fee: modeled on the $15.8M shrunk median for 2010s/blockbuster (n=11)
2010Lead$250,000,000$976,536,918$15,731,214
Harry Potter and the Forbidden Journey
no disclosed fee: modeled on the $5.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid); budget unreported, small-film terms
2010Lead$2,992,891
Wild Target
no disclosed fee: modeled on the $5.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid), capped at $1.2M
2010Lead$8,000,000$3,500,000$1,197,342
Best Ensemble
no disclosed fee: modeled on the $18.8M median for its era and nearest band (mid); budget unreported, small-film terms
2009Lead$2,987,838
Cherrybomb
no disclosed fee: modeled on the $18.8M median for its era and nearest band (mid), capped at $0.1M
2009Lead$1,000,000$30,143$150,000
Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince
no disclosed fee: modeled on the $20.0M shrunk median for 2000s/blockbuster (n=1)
2009Lead$250,000,000$933,959,197$19,906,307
Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix
no disclosed fee: modeled on the $11.8M shrunk median for 2000s/tentpole (n=9)
2007Lead$150,000,000$941,676,843$11,610,932
Driving Lessons
no disclosed fee: modeled on the $18.8M median for its era and nearest band (mid); budget unreported, small-film terms
2006Lead$1,300,000$2,912,811
The Queen's Handbag
no disclosed fee: modeled on the $18.8M median for its era and nearest band (mid); budget unreported, small-film terms
2006Lead$2,912,811
Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire
no disclosed fee: modeled on the $11.8M shrunk median for 2000s/tentpole (n=9)
2005Lead$150,000,000$895,921,036$11,069,560
Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban
no disclosed fee: modeled on the $11.8M shrunk median for 2000s/tentpole (n=9)
2004Lead$130,000,000$797,361,618$10,444,639
BBC Radio 4
soft-breakthrough supporting blend (w=0.79)
2003Supporting$1,878,416
Harry Potter and the Chamber of Secrets
soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.79): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $11.8M shrunk median for 2000s/tentpole (n=9) vs early terms
2003Lead$100,000,000$879,793,867$9,414,443
British Critic's Circle
soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.66): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $18.8M median for its era and nearest band (mid); budget unreported, small-film terms vs early terms
2002Lead$2,141,290
Emma Watson
soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.66): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $18.8M median for its era and nearest band (mid); budget unreported, small-film terms vs early terms
2002Lead$2,141,290
Harry Potter and the Chamber of Secrets
soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.66): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $11.8M shrunk median for 2000s/tentpole (n=9) vs early terms
2002Lead$100,000,000$879,793,867$7,909,170
Thunderpants
soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.66): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $18.8M median for its era and nearest band (mid), capped at $1.1M vs early terms
2002Lead$7,000,000$3,000,000$852,815
Harry Potter and the Philosopher's Stone
soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.50): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $11.8M shrunk median for 2000s/tentpole (n=9) vs early terms
2001Lead$125,000,000$978,087,613$6,056,818
Harry Potter and the Philosopher's Stone (film)
soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.50): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $11.8M shrunk median for 2000s/tentpole (n=9) vs early terms
2001Lead$125,000,000$1,029,000,000$6,056,818

建模人物如何工作。 An undisclosed lead role after the breakthrough gets the median of disclosed lead salaries for its era and budget band, capped at 15% of the film’s budget. Supporting and pre-breakthrough roles get 2.5% of that median, the documented going rate for actors before stardom. Films with no reported budget are treated as small productions. Undocumented backend, endorsements, and producer or director credits enter as separate estimated lines in the calculation above, built from disclosed medians. Every median comes from the published tables on our 方法页.

净资产 Over Time

$50M$100M$150M20002006201220182026$194.9 Million2000: $831,8002001: $5,052,6332002: $9,628,9472003: $15,138,1752004: $20,316,5482005: $24,386,6312006: $28,652,0252007: $32,840,0872008: $32,548,3042009: $42,255,7572010: $51,380,7072011: $59,845,6972012: $67,842,7992013: $77,426,4592014: $86,828,2722015: $92,213,4032016: $98,458,2672017: $109,955,4472018: $113,370,6042019: $127,482,8642020: $139,869,2442021: $155,838,6772022: $147,791,2762023: $163,780,6672024: $175,601,2612025: $190,108,1072026: $194,937,937

每年年底的余额模型,与下表相匹配。

逐年

Rupert Grint year by year model
YearIncome代表费税率SpentSavedBalance
2026$4,282,184$642,32840%$1,203,773$980,141$194,937,937
2025$4,038,216$605,73240%$1,135,191$924,299$190,108,107
2024$1,058,919$158,83840%$364,209$175,840$175,601,261
2023$8,226,644$1,233,99740%$2,312,608$1,882,980$163,780,667
2022$11,231,113$1,684,66740%$3,157,201$2,570,667$147,791,276
2021$14,967,965$2,245,19540%$4,207,674$3,425,987$155,838,677
2020$10,150,112$1,522,51740%$2,853,318$2,323,239$139,869,244
2019$5,290,219$793,53340%$1,487,144$1,210,868$127,482,864
2018$12,115,171$1,817,27640%$3,405,720$2,773,017$113,370,604
2017$15,429,943$2,314,49140%$4,337,542$3,531,729$109,955,447
2016$5,248,931$787,34040%$1,475,538$1,201,417$98,458,267
2015$14,180,600$2,127,09040%$3,986,337$3,245,769$92,213,403
2014$19,237,860$2,885,67940%$5,407,993$4,403,315$86,828,272
2013$12,786,576$1,917,98640%$3,594,460$2,926,694$77,426,459
2012$17,316,233$2,597,43540%$4,867,801$3,963,478$67,842,799
2011$28,308,766$4,246,31540%$7,957,934$6,479,537$59,845,697
2010$27,137,912$4,070,68740%$7,628,793$6,211,542$51,380,707
2009$27,827,501$4,174,12540%$7,822,644$6,369,381$42,255,757
2008$11,681,156$1,752,17340%$3,283,713$2,673,676$32,548,304
2007$13,250,951$1,987,64340%$3,725,001$3,032,984$32,840,087
2006$12,536,394$1,880,45940%$3,524,131$2,869,430$28,652,025
2005$14,836,331$2,225,45040%$4,170,671$3,395,858$24,386,631
2004$19,481,969$2,922,29540%$5,476,615$4,459,189$20,316,548
2003$20,600,789$3,090,11840%$5,791,129$4,715,273$15,138,175
2002$20,658,792$3,098,81940%$5,807,434$4,728,550$9,628,947
2001$18,442,168$2,766,32540%$5,184,315$4,221,191$5,052,633
2000$3,634,091$545,11440%$1,021,587$831,800$831,800

Model Notes

  • RESIDENCE PROXY: Hertfordshire estate, so UK rates apply throughout
  • salary comps: 2 disclosed lead fee(s) flagged as non-market outliers (scale / far-below-quote) and excluded from era medians
  • UK filing check: attributable company net assets $33,477,181 (Clay 10 Limited (07724029, GBP 30,050,660 at 2025-03-31, band mid 88%); Eevil Plan Properties Limited (08571078, GBP 75,037 at 2025-03-31, band mid 88%)) sit below the modeled balance; counted as a documented floor, not added
  • 图片来源: Wikimedia Commons via Wikipedia (Rupert Grint)
重现这个数字。 净值估计应该像科学发现一样是可重复的:相同的公众投入和相同的公布率应该总是给出相同的答案。电影预算和票房是公开报告的。每一份披露的工资、费率、税率、储蓄率和基准回报率都会在我们的网站上发布并引用 方法页. Undisclosed lead roles use the median of disclosed salaries for their era and budget band, capped at 15% of the film’s budget. Supporting and early-career roles use the documented pre-stardom fraction of that median. Undocumented backend, endorsements, and hyphenate credits enter as estimated lines from disclosed medians. Apply the rates year by year as shown above and you will land on $194.9 Million.

方法论

We rebuild Rupert’s career as a yearly time series. Disclosed salaries and documented backend enter as reported, with citations. Undisclosed lead roles get the median of disclosed salaries for their era and budget band, capped at 15% of the film’s budget. Supporting roles and roles from before the breakthrough get 2.5% of that median, the going-rate ratio measured from disclosed pre-stardom deals. Films with no reported budget are treated as small productions, and every role is estimated unless a source documents it was unpaid. Representation fees come out at sourced rates, taxes follow the eras actually lived through, spending follows measured household savings behavior unless court documents say otherwise, and what remains compounds at real market returns. Undocumented backend enters as an expected value from disclosed deals, endorsements at the median disclosed ambassador fee, and producer or director credits at union-scale floors.

完整的模型、每个费率表以及我们的估算如何与实际交易进行核对的信息均位于 方法页.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Rupert Grint's net worth in 2026?

As of 2026, Rupert Grint's net worth is an estimated $194.9 Million. The estimate is built film by film from disclosed salaries and documented backend, then year by year: income, minus representation fees and taxes, minus spending, compounded at real market returns.

How does Rupert Grint make money?

电影工资和记录的后端参与。

How is Rupert Grint's net worth calculated?

Disclosed paydays enter as reported, with citations. Undisclosed lead roles use the median of disclosed salaries for their era and budget band, capped at 15% of the film's budget, and supporting or early-career roles use the documented pre-stardom fraction of that median. We subtract sourced representation fees, taxes for the years Rupert actually worked, and spending from measured savings behavior, then compound at real market returns. Undocumented backend, endorsements, and producing credits enter as estimated lines from disclosed medians. Every rate and source is published.

How much does Rupert Grint make per film?

它因角色和时代而异,上面的逐部电影表格列出了每部电影的片酬。披露的发薪日按报告输入。未公开的角色是根据同等演员在同一时代和预算范围内的收入来建模的,突破后的主角收入最高,配角或早期角色只占其中的一小部分。

为什么税率那么高,演员不跟外贷公司避税吗?

Tax comes out at the effective rate for where Rupert lived each year, which is the rate shown in the year-by-year table. In a high-tax state like California, combined federal and state income tax reaches close to half of a top earner's income, so those years run in the mid-40s percent. A loan-out company, the corporation many actors run their income through, does not lower the tax on the money they take home. Its real advantage is deducting business costs such as agent, manager, and attorney fees, and the model already subtracts those as a separate line before any tax is applied. High-earning performers also fall outside the pass-through business deduction that other company owners can claim, so it buys them no rate cut.

为什么这个数字与其他净值网站不同?

Most sites publish a single number with no way to check it. This estimate is built in the open: every salary, rate, and assumption is on the page, and the 方法页 lists every source.

这个估计有多准确?

对于个人的净资产没有准确的估计;这是根据公共数据构建的模型。不同之处在于您可以看到它是如何构建的并检查每一步。计算顶部附近的置信度显示了该数字有多少是基于披露的数字,以及数字依赖于假设的页面标记。

Is Rupert Grint rich compared to the average person?

Yes. A net worth of $194.9 Million is far above the median American household, which sits near $193,000 according to Federal Reserve data.

What is Rupert Grint's biggest source of wealth?

On this page it is film salaries, the largest line in the calculation at $218.7 Million. The full breakdown, with every other line and its source, is above.

How much does Rupert Grint make from endorsements?

The model counts $16.0 Million in career endorsement income for Rupert: 1 named partnerships x the $4.0M annual fee from the median disclosed film deal x a 4-year term, spread across the deal years. It is an estimate, since the individual deal values are not all public, and it sits as its own line in the calculation above.

探索其他演员

关于NetWorth Explained

We originally created NWE because nobody in the public-figure net worth space showed their work. Magazines and sites threw out big numbers while hiding behind vague claims of “proprietary algorithms” 或者 “insider knowledge.” That’s why we started the world’s only publication that transparently showed every assumption, every variable, and every calculation. We’re still the only ones who do it this way. 了解更多关于NetWorth Explained的信息.