Elizabeth Olsen صافي الثروة 2026
آخر تحديث August 3, 2026
As of 2026, Elizabeth Olsen has an estimated net worth of $82.1 Million, computed film by film and year by year from public records and published rates. Every input, rate, and source behind the number is on this page.
Calculation
- تم الكشف عن الرواتب والواجهة الخلفية الموثقة، مع ذكر كل منها
- الأدوار غير المكشوف عنها تم تصميمها من المقارنات التي تم الكشف عنها لعصرهم ونطاق الميزانية والمرحلة المهنية
- الواجهة الخلفية والتأييدات وإنتاج الاعتمادات المقدرة من الوسيطات التي تم الكشف عنها
Fast Facts
| Birthdate | February 16, 1989 |
|---|---|
| Birthplace | Sherman Oaks |
| Breakthrough | Martha Marcy May Marlene (2011) |
| Best Known | WandaVision (2021) |
Who Is Elizabeth Olsen?
Elizabeth Olsen was born February 16, 1989 in Sherman Oaks, best known for WandaVision (2021). The earnings behind Elizabeth's net worth come from film salaries, backend participation, and endorsement deals.
The model tracks Elizabeth's earning years from 1994 to 2026, with the biggest single year in 2022 at about $35.9 Million of gross income. After representation fees, taxes, and living costs, what stays invested compounds at market returns into an estimated $82.1 Million today.
Data
يتم حساب كل سطر أدناه من البيانات العامة وجداول الأسعار المنشورة على موقعنا صفحة المنهجية. ثقة: الصف ج. لا تغطي الأرقام الموثقة سوى حصة صغيرة من هذا الرقم، لذا فإن معظمها تم تصميمه على أساس المعدلات المنشورة والمقارنات (تتراوح الدرجات من A، موثق في الغالب، إلى C، في الغالب على شكل نماذج).
The Calculation
| Line | Amount |
|---|---|
| Revenue | |
| Film pay, modeled lead roles (20 of 38 films) era and budget-band medians of disclosed lead salaries (winsorized, thin cells shrunk toward the era median), blended with this actor's disclosed quote history when available; soft breakthrough blend near the career break year | $152,011,818 |
| Film pay, modeled post-breakthrough supporting roles (2 of 38 films) 12.0% of lead cells: lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio | $4,976,376 |
| Film pay, modeled supporting and early roles (16 of 38 films) 2.5% من متوسطات العصر: معدل ما قبل النجومية | $18,043,655 |
| نقاط الواجهة الخلفية، المقدرة 12% of disclosed lead deals included points, at a median 2.6% of box office; expected value on 17 commercially viable undisclosed lead roles; cash spread over 3 years; 9 film(s) used band-specific box-office/budget multiples as a gross proxy | $29,230,445 |
| الموافقات، المقدرة (شراكة علامة تجارية واحدة) 1 named partnerships x the $4.0M annual fee from the median disclosed film deal x a 4-year term, spread across the deal years | $16,000,000 |
| البقايا المقدرة SAG residual rates on post-theatrical receipts assumed at half of box office, split by role share and spread over the ten years after each release; 15 film(s) used band-specific box-office proxies | $65,709,164 |
| TV: Drunk History Norma Kopp; guest default per credited year; cable network family; priced from tv_episode_rates.csv (en.wikipedia.org) | $30,000 |
| TV: HarmonQuest Stirrip; guest default per credited year; network not identified, priced on the broadcast cell; priced from tv_episode_rates.csv (en.wikipedia.org) | $30,000 |
| TV: Sorry for Your Loss Leigh Shaw; series episode total for a full-run credit; network not identified, priced on the broadcast cell; priced from tv_episode_rates.csv (en.wikipedia.org) | $5,000,000 |
| TV: WandaVision Wanda Maximoff / Scarlet Witch; stated episode count; network not identified, priced on the broadcast cell; priced from tv_episode_rates.csv (en.wikipedia.org) | $2,250,000 |
| TV: Marvel Studios: Assembled Herself; stated episode count; network not identified, priced on the broadcast cell; priced from tv_episode_rates.csv (en.wikipedia.org) | $30,000 |
| TV: Saturday Night Live Herself; guest default per credited year; variety format tier; priced from tv_episode_rates.csv (en.wikipedia.org) | $30,000 |
| TV: Love & Death Candy Montgomery; stated episode count; streaming network family; priced from tv_episode_rates.csv (en.wikipedia.org) | $5,250,000 |
| TV: What If...? Wanda Maximoff / Scarlet Witch; stated episode count; animation format tier; priced from tv_episode_rates.csv (en.wikipedia.org) | $24,000 |
| TV: Marvel Zombies Wanda Maximoff / Scarlet Witch; stated episode count; network not identified, priced on the broadcast cell; priced from tv_episode_rates.csv (en.wikipedia.org) | $750,000 |
| عوائد الاستثمار على الادخار mixed portfolio: 55% actual 60/40 securities returns (taxed) + 45% US long-run home-price rate on the rest | $23,423,155 |
| Expenses | |
| رسوم التمثيل الوكيل 10% + المحامي 5% | -$42,427,557 |
| Taxes المعدلات الفعلية للولايات المتحدة-كاليفورنيا، سنة بعد سنة | -$109,443,395 |
| الإنفاق الشخصي measured household savings rates by income, times a 88% entertainment-household factor | -$72,297,552 |
| القيمة الصافية المقدرة | $82,105,031 |
فيلم بعد فيلم
| Film | Year | Role | Budget | شباك التذاكر | تم احتساب الدفع |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Eternity no disclosed fee: modeled on the $25.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid), capped at $1.8M | 2025 | Lead | $12,000,000 | $35,000,000 | $1,798,507 |
| Marvel Zombies no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $23.8M shrunk median for 2020s/large (n=2) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio) | 2025 | Supporting | $70,000,000 | – | $2,847,132 |
| Seven Sisters no disclosed fee: modeled on the $23.8M shrunk median for 2020s/large (n=2), capped at $10.5M | 2025 | Lead | $70,000,000 | – | $10,487,409 |
| The Assessment no disclosed fee: modeled on the $25.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid), capped at $1.2M | 2024 | Lead | $8,000,000 | $279,328 | $1,198,578 |
| Best Villain in a Movie no disclosed fee: modeled on the $23.8M shrunk median for 2020s/large (n=2), capped at $10.5M | 2023 | Lead | $70,000,000 | – | $10,452,403 |
| His Three Daughters no disclosed fee: modeled on the $23.8M shrunk median for 2020s/large (n=2), capped at $10.5M | 2023 | Lead | $70,000,000 | – | $10,452,403 |
| Love & Death no disclosed fee: modeled on the $23.8M shrunk median for 2020s/large (n=2), capped at $10.5M | 2023 | Lead | $70,000,000 | – | $10,452,403 |
| Action Movie Star of 2022 no disclosed fee: modeled on the $23.8M shrunk median for 2020s/large (n=2), capped at $10.5M | 2022 | Lead | $70,000,000 | – | $10,407,714 |
| Doctor Strange in the Multiverse of Madness no disclosed fee: modeled on the $18.0M shrunk median for 2020s/blockbuster (n=8) | 2022 | Lead | $200,000,000 | $955,775,804 | $17,836,505 |
| الرجل العنكبوت: لا طريق للمنزل no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $18.0M shrunk median for 2020s/blockbuster (n=8) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio) | 2021 | Supporting | $200,000,000 | $1,921,847,111 | $2,129,244 |
| WandaVision no disclosed fee: modeled on the $23.8M shrunk median for 2020s/large (n=2), capped at $10.5M | 2021 | Lead | $70,000,000 | – | $10,321,824 |
| المنتقمون: نهاية اللعبة no disclosed fee: modeled on the $15.8M shrunk median for 2010s/blockbuster (n=11) | 2019 | Lead | $356,000,000 | $2,797,501,328 | $14,770,330 |
| المنتقمون: حرب إنفينيتي no disclosed fee: modeled on the $15.8M shrunk median for 2010s/blockbuster (n=11) | 2018 | Lead | $400,000,000 | $2,048,359,754 | $13,936,486 |
| HarmonQuest soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.79): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3), capped at $6.0M vs early terms | 2017 | Lead | $40,000,000 | – | $4,805,716 |
| Ingrid Goes West soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.79): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $5.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid), capped at $0.5M vs early terms | 2017 | Lead | $3,300,000 | $3,300,000 | $417,815 |
| Kodachrome soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.79): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3), capped at $6.0M vs early terms | 2017 | Lead | $40,000,000 | $70,149 | $4,805,716 |
| Sorry for Your Loss soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.79): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3), capped at $6.0M vs early terms | 2017 | Lead | $40,000,000 | – | $4,805,716 |
| Wind River soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.79): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $5.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid), capped at $1.6M vs early terms | 2017 | Lead | $11,000,000 | $43,980,821 | $1,331,872 |
| كابتن أمريكا: الحرب الأهلية soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.66): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $15.8M shrunk median for 2010s/blockbuster (n=11) vs early terms | 2016 | Lead | $250,000,000 | $1,153,296,293 | $10,553,360 |
| Drunk History soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.66): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3), capped at $6.0M vs early terms | 2016 | Lead | $40,000,000 | – | $4,057,830 |
| المنتقمون: عصر أولترون soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.50): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $15.8M shrunk median for 2010s/blockbuster (n=11) vs early terms | 2015 | Lead | $250,000,000 | $1,402,805,868 | $8,081,731 |
| I Saw the Light soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.50): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $5.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid), capped at $1.9M vs early terms | 2015 | Lead | $13,000,000 | $1,800,000 | $1,037,500 |
| Captain America: The Winter Soldier soft-breakthrough supporting blend (w=0.34) | 2014 | Supporting | $170,000,000 | $714,421,503 | $1,144,563 |
| Godzilla soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.34): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $20.0M shrunk median for 2010s/tentpole (n=12) vs early terms | 2014 | Lead | $160,000,000 | $529,100,000 | $7,115,251 |
| In Secret soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.34): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3), capped at $6.0M vs early terms | 2014 | Lead | $40,000,000 | $1,400,000 | $2,217,170 |
| Very Good Girls soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.34): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $5.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid), capped at $0.0M vs early terms | 2014 | Lead | $6,940 | $6,940 | $1,041 |
| Kill Your Darlings soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.21): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $5.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid), capped at $0.8M vs early terms | 2013 | Lead | $5,600,000 | $1,800,000 | $274,155 |
| Oldboy soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.21): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $5.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid), capped at $0.5M vs early terms | 2013 | Lead | $3,000,000 | $15,194,593 | $192,798 |
| روميو وجولييت soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.21): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3), capped at $6.0M vs early terms | 2013 | Lead | $40,000,000 | $1,162,635 | $1,469,284 |
| تحالف الصحفيات السينمائيات no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3) (pre-stardom rate); soft-breakthrough weight 0.12 | 2012 | Lead | $40,000,000 | – | $957,437 |
| Breakthrough Artist no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3) (pre-stardom rate); soft-breakthrough weight 0.12 | 2012 | Lead | $40,000,000 | – | $957,437 |
| Liberal Arts no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3) (pre-stardom rate); soft-breakthrough weight 0.12 | 2012 | Lead | $40,000,000 | $1,100,000 | $957,437 |
| Peace, Love & Misunderstanding no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3) (pre-stardom rate); soft-breakthrough weight 0.12 | 2012 | Lead | $40,000,000 | $542,762 | $957,437 |
| Red Lights no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $5.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid) (pre-stardom rate); soft-breakthrough weight 0.12 | 2012 | Lead | $14,000,000 | $14,100,000 | $360,426 |
| Elle (magazine) no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3) (pre-stardom rate); soft-breakthrough weight 0.06 | 2011 | Lead | $40,000,000 | – | $646,948 |
| Martha Marcy May Marlene no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $5.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid) (pre-stardom rate), capped at 15% of budget; soft-breakthrough weight 0.06 | 2011 | Lead | $600,000 | $5,400,000 | $90,000 |
| Village Voice Film Poll no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3) (pre-stardom rate) | 2011 | Supporting | $40,000,000 | – | $342,893 |
| How the West Was Fun no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $14.4M shrunk median for 1990s/mid (n=6) (pre-stardom rate); soft-breakthrough weight 0.00 | 1994 | Lead | $26,000,000 | – | $359,378 |
كيفية عمل الأشكال النموذجية. An undisclosed lead role after the breakthrough gets the median of disclosed lead salaries for its era and budget band, capped at 15% of the film’s budget. Supporting and pre-breakthrough roles get 2.5% of that median, the documented going rate for actors before stardom. Films with no reported budget are treated as small productions. Undocumented backend, endorsements, and producer or director credits enter as separate estimated lines in the calculation above, built from disclosed medians. Every median comes from the published tables on our صفحة المنهجية.
صافي الثروة Over Time
الرصيد النموذجي في نهاية كل عام، مطابقًا للجدول السنوي أدناه.
سنة بعد سنة
| Year | Income | رسوم مندوب | معدل الضريبة | Spent | Saved | Balance |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | $5,321,422 | $798,213 | 45% | $1,371,256 | $1,116,509 | $82,105,031 |
| 2025 | $17,824,274 | $2,673,641 | 45% | $4,593,066 | $3,739,782 | $79,381,056 |
| 2024 | $13,218,012 | $1,982,702 | 45% | $3,406,097 | $2,773,324 | $70,505,577 |
| 2023 | $35,320,194 | $5,298,029 | 45% | $9,101,519 | $7,410,671 | $62,717,169 |
| 2022 | $35,939,833 | $5,390,975 | 45% | $9,261,192 | $7,540,680 | $50,762,656 |
| 2021 | $27,588,722 | $4,138,308 | 45% | $7,109,227 | $5,788,500 | $46,382,229 |
| 2020 | $13,809,403 | $2,071,411 | 45% | $3,558,490 | $2,897,406 | $37,441,233 |
| 2019 | $21,442,568 | $3,216,385 | 45% | $5,525,450 | $4,498,951 | $32,154,611 |
| 2018 | $26,465,852 | $3,969,878 | 45% | $6,819,880 | $5,552,906 | $24,995,784 |
| 2017 | $24,536,684 | $3,680,503 | 47% | $6,092,841 | $4,960,935 | $19,329,990 |
| 2016 | $23,199,300 | $3,479,895 | 47% | $5,760,748 | $4,690,537 | $13,352,732 |
| 2015 | $16,775,026 | $2,516,254 | 47% | $4,165,501 | $3,391,649 | $8,234,230 |
| 2014 | $10,228,319 | $1,534,248 | 47% | $2,539,851 | $2,068,007 | $4,727,733 |
| 2013 | $4,645,921 | $696,888 | 47% | $1,153,655 | $939,333 | $2,506,669 |
| 2012 | $3,568,771 | $535,316 | 43% | $953,063 | $776,006 | $1,435,322 |
| 2011 | $2,012,941 | $301,941 | 43% | $537,569 | $437,701 | $618,043 |
| 2010 | $323,952 | $48,593 | 43% | $123,806 | $33,149 | $173,672 |
| 2009 | $0 | $0 | 43% | $0 | $0 | $131,539 |
| 2008 | $0 | $0 | 43% | $0 | $0 | $120,068 |
| 2007 | $0 | $0 | 43% | $0 | $0 | $131,987 |
| 2006 | $0 | $0 | 43% | $0 | $0 | $126,263 |
| 2005 | $0 | $0 | 43% | $0 | $0 | $118,391 |
| 2004 | $26,981 | $4,047 | 43% | $11,807 | $1,265 | $114,231 |
| 2003 | $26,981 | $4,047 | 43% | $11,807 | $1,265 | $107,145 |
| 2002 | $26,981 | $4,047 | 46% | $11,185 | $1,199 | $96,429 |
| 2001 | $26,981 | $4,047 | 46% | $11,185 | $1,199 | $98,189 |
| 2000 | $26,981 | $4,047 | 46% | $11,185 | $1,199 | $97,032 |
| 1999 | $26,981 | $4,047 | 46% | $11,185 | $1,199 | $94,343 |
| 1998 | $26,981 | $4,047 | 46% | $11,185 | $1,199 | $86,970 |
| 1997 | $26,981 | $4,047 | 46% | $11,185 | $1,199 | $77,600 |
| 1996 | $26,981 | $4,047 | 46% | $11,185 | $1,199 | $68,291 |
| 1995 | $26,981 | $4,047 | 46% | $11,185 | $1,199 | $62,187 |
| 1994 | $359,378 | $53,907 | 46% | $111,245 | $53,709 | $53,709 |
Model Notes
- وكيل الإقامة: لم يتم الحصول على مكان الإقامة بشكل فردي لهذه الدفعة؛ يتم تطبيق الوضع الافتراضي US-CA حتى يتم توثيقه
- salary comps: 2 disclosed lead fee(s) flagged as non-market outliers (scale / far-below-quote) and excluded from era medians
- رصيد الصورة: Wikimedia Commons via Wikipedia (Elizabeth Olsen)
المنهجية
We rebuild Elizabeth’s career as a yearly time series. Disclosed salaries and documented backend enter as reported, with citations. Undisclosed lead roles get the median of disclosed salaries for their era and budget band, capped at 15% of the film’s budget. Supporting roles and roles from before the breakthrough get 2.5% of that median, the going-rate ratio measured from disclosed pre-stardom deals. Films with no reported budget are treated as small productions, and every role is estimated unless a source documents it was unpaid. Representation fees come out at sourced rates, taxes follow the eras actually lived through, spending follows measured household savings behavior unless court documents say otherwise, and what remains compounds at real market returns. Undocumented backend enters as an expected value from disclosed deals, endorsements at the median disclosed ambassador fee, and producer or director credits at union-scale floors.
النموذج الكامل، وكل جدول أسعار، وكيفية مقارنة تقديراتنا بالصفقات الحقيقية موجودة على الموقع صفحة المنهجية.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is Elizabeth Olsen's net worth in 2026?
As of 2026, Elizabeth Olsen's net worth is an estimated $82.1 Million. The estimate is built film by film from disclosed salaries and documented backend, then year by year: income, minus representation fees and taxes, minus spending, compounded at real market returns.
How does Elizabeth Olsen make money?
رواتب الأفلام والمشاركة الخلفية الموثقة.
How is Elizabeth Olsen's net worth calculated?
Disclosed paydays enter as reported, with citations. Undisclosed lead roles use the median of disclosed salaries for their era and budget band, capped at 15% of the film's budget, and supporting or early-career roles use the documented pre-stardom fraction of that median. We subtract sourced representation fees, taxes for the years Elizabeth actually worked, and spending from measured savings behavior, then compound at real market returns. Undocumented backend, endorsements, and producing credits enter as estimated lines from disclosed medians. Every rate and source is published.
How much does Elizabeth Olsen make per film?
ويختلف حسب الدور والعصر، ويسرد جدول كل فيلم على حدة الأجر المحسوب لكل عنوان. أيام الدفع المفصح عنها تدخل كما ورد. يتم تصميم الأدوار غير المكشوف عنها وفقًا لما كسبه الممثلون المشابهون في نفس العصر ونطاق الميزانية، حيث حققت الأدوار القيادية بعد الاختراق أكبر قدر من الأرباح والأدوار الداعمة أو المبكرة جزءًا موثقًا من ذلك.
لماذا معدل الضريبة مرتفع جدًا، ولا يتجنبه الممثلون من خلال شركة مُقرضة؟
Tax comes out at the effective rate for where Elizabeth lived each year, which is the rate shown in the year-by-year table. In a high-tax state like California, combined federal and state income tax reaches close to half of a top earner's income, so those years run in the mid-40s percent. A loan-out company, the corporation many actors run their income through, does not lower the tax on the money they take home. Its real advantage is deducting business costs such as agent, manager, and attorney fees, and the model already subtracts those as a separate line before any tax is applied. High-earning performers also fall outside the pass-through business deduction that other company owners can claim, so it buys them no rate cut.
لماذا يختلف هذا الرقم عن المواقع الأخرى ذات القيمة الصافية؟
Most sites publish a single number with no way to check it. This estimate is built in the open: every salary, rate, and assumption is on the page, and the صفحة المنهجية lists every source.
ما مدى دقة هذا التقدير؟
لا يوجد تقدير دقيق لصافي قيمة الفرد؛ هذا النموذج مبني على البيانات العامة. الفرق هو أنه يمكنك رؤية كيفية بنائه والتحقق من كل خطوة. تُظهر درجة الثقة بالقرب من الجزء العلوي من العملية الحسابية مقدار الرقم الذي يعتمد على الأرقام التي تم الكشف عنها، وعلامات الصفحة حيث يعتمد الرقم على الافتراض.
Is Elizabeth Olsen rich compared to the average person?
Yes. A net worth of $82.1 Million is far above the median American household, which sits near $193,000 according to Federal Reserve data.
What is Elizabeth Olsen's biggest source of wealth?
On this page it is film salaries, the largest line in the calculation at $152.0 Million. The full breakdown, with every other line and its source, is above.
How much does Elizabeth Olsen make from endorsements?
The model counts $16.0 Million in career endorsement income for Elizabeth: 1 named partnerships x the $4.0M annual fee from the median disclosed film deal x a 4-year term, spread across the deal years. It is an estimate, since the individual deal values are not all public, and it sits as its own line in the calculation above.
استكشاف الجهات الفاعلة الأخرى
حول NetWorth Explained
We originally created NWE because nobody in the public-figure net worth space showed their work. Magazines and sites threw out big numbers while hiding behind vague claims of “proprietary algorithms” أو “insider knowledge.” That’s why we started the world’s only publication that transparently showed every assumption, every variable, and every calculation. We’re still the only ones who do it this way. إقرأ المزيد عن NetWorth Explained.