Jennifer Lawrence صافي الثروة 2026
آخر تحديث August 3, 2026
As of 2026, Jennifer Lawrence has an estimated net worth of $150.7 Million, computed film by film and year by year from public records and published rates. Every input, rate, and source behind the number is on this page.
Calculation
- تم الكشف عن الرواتب والواجهة الخلفية الموثقة، مع ذكر كل منها
- الأدوار غير المكشوف عنها تم تصميمها من المقارنات التي تم الكشف عنها لعصرهم ونطاق الميزانية والمرحلة المهنية
- الواجهة الخلفية والتأييدات وإنتاج الاعتمادات المقدرة من الوسيطات التي تم الكشف عنها
Fast Facts
| Birthdate | August 15, 1990 |
|---|---|
| Birthplace | Indian Hills |
| Breakthrough | Winter's Bone (2010) |
| Best Known | The Hunger Games (2012) |
Who Is Jennifer Lawrence?
Jennifer Lawrence was born August 15, 1990 in Indian Hills, best known for The Hunger Games (2012). The earnings behind Jennifer's net worth come from film salaries, backend participation, and endorsement deals.
The model tracks Jennifer's earning years from 2005 to 2026, with the biggest single year in 2014 at about $52.7 Million of gross income. After representation fees, taxes, and living costs, what stays invested compounds at market returns into an estimated $150.7 Million today.
Data
يتم حساب كل سطر أدناه من البيانات العامة وجداول الأسعار المنشورة على موقعنا صفحة المنهجية. ثقة: الصف ج. لا تغطي الأرقام الموثقة سوى حصة صغيرة من هذا الرقم، لذا فإن معظمها تم تصميمه على أساس المعدلات المنشورة والمقارنات (تتراوح الدرجات من A، موثق في الغالب، إلى C، في الغالب على شكل نماذج).
The Calculation
| Line | Amount |
|---|---|
| Revenue | |
| Film pay with a disclosed figure (2 of 36 films) الرواتب لكل فيلم والخلفية من التقارير المذكورة | $45,000,000 |
| Film pay, modeled lead roles (20 of 36 films) era and budget-band medians of disclosed lead salaries (winsorized, thin cells shrunk toward the era median), blended with this actor's disclosed quote history when available; soft breakthrough blend near the career break year | $269,806,286 |
| Film pay, modeled post-breakthrough supporting roles (3 of 36 films) 12.0% of lead cells: lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio | $8,259,563 |
| Film pay, modeled supporting and early roles (11 of 36 films) 2.5% من متوسطات العصر: معدل ما قبل النجومية | $14,131,066 |
| نقاط الواجهة الخلفية، المقدرة 12% of disclosed lead deals included points, at a median 2.6% of box office; expected value on 19 commercially viable undisclosed lead roles; cash spread over 3 years; 4 film(s) used band-specific box-office/budget multiples as a gross proxy | $18,245,328 |
| الموافقات المقدرة (3 شراكات مع علامات تجارية) 3 named partnerships x the $5.0M annual fee from the median disclosed film deal, scaled 1.25x to this actor's quote vs era median x a 4-year term, spread across the deal years | $60,000,000 |
| البقايا المقدرة SAG residual rates on post-theatrical receipts assumed at half of box office, split by role share and spread over the ten years after each release; 12 film(s) used band-specific box-office proxies | $42,470,869 |
| TV: Monk Mascot; guest default per credited year; cable network family; priced from tv_episode_rates.csv (en.wikipedia.org) | $30,000 |
| TV: Cold Case credited role; guest default per credited year; broadcast network family; priced from tv_episode_rates.csv (en.wikipedia.org) | $30,000 |
| TV: Medium Young Allison / Claire Chase; stated episode count; broadcast network family; priced from tv_episode_rates.csv (en.wikipedia.org) | $30,000 |
| TV: The Bill Engvall Show credited role; series episode total for a full-run credit; cable network family; priced from tv_episode_rates.csv (en.wikipedia.org) | $6,000,000 |
| TV: Saturday Night Live Herself (host); guest default per credited year; variety format tier; priced from tv_episode_rates.csv (en.wikipedia.org) | $30,000 |
| TV: Jimmy Kimmel Live! Herself (host); guest default per credited year; talk format tier; priced from tv_episode_rates.csv (en.wikipedia.org) | $10,000 |
| عوائد الاستثمار على الادخار mixed portfolio: 55% actual 60/40 securities returns (taxed) + 45% US long-run home-price rate on the rest | $55,525,365 |
| Expenses | |
| رسوم التمثيل الوكيل 10% + المحامي 5% | -$68,959,097 |
| Taxes المعدلات الفعلية للولايات المتحدة ونيويورك، سنة بعد سنة | -$178,574,975 |
| الإنفاق الشخصي measured household savings rates by income, times a 88% entertainment-household factor | -$116,990,771 |
| القيمة الصافية المقدرة | $150,727,833 |
فيلم بعد فيلم
| Film | Year | Role | Budget | شباك التذاكر | تم احتساب الدفع |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| The Hunger Games: Sunrise on the Reaping no disclosed fee: modeled on the $23.8M shrunk median for 2020s/large (n=2); blended 75% with this actor's disclosed quote history ($25.0M personal, n=1); cap raised to similar-budget personal max within 50% of budget ($25.0M) | 2026 | Lead | $70,000,000 | – | $24,685,370 |
| What Happens at Night no disclosed fee: modeled on the $23.8M shrunk median for 2020s/large (n=2); blended 75% with this actor's disclosed quote history ($25.0M personal, n=1); cap raised to similar-budget personal max within 50% of budget ($25.0M) | 2026 | Lead | $70,000,000 | – | $24,685,370 |
| Die My Love no disclosed fee: modeled on the $25.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid); personal blend cut to 24% on a smaller-than-usual budget; blended 24% with this actor's disclosed quote history ($25.0M personal, n=1); cap raised to similar-budget personal max within 50% of budget ($6.1M), capped at $6.1M | 2025 | Lead | $12,200,000 | $12,200,000 | $6,099,057 |
| Zurawski v Texas no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $23.8M shrunk median for 2020s/large (n=2) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio) | 2024 | Supporting | $70,000,000 | – | $2,999,193 |
| Bread and Roses no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $23.8M shrunk median for 2020s/large (n=2) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio) | 2023 | Supporting | $70,000,000 | – | $2,998,429 |
| No Hard Feelings no disclosed fee: modeled on the $21.7M shrunk median for 2020s/mid (n=1); personal blend cut to 73% on a smaller-than-usual budget; blended 73% with this actor's disclosed quote history ($25.0M personal, n=2); cap raised to similar-budget personal max within 50% of budget ($22.5M), capped at $22.5M | 2023 | Lead | $45,000,000 | $87,300,000 | $22,485,662 |
| Causeway no disclosed fee: modeled on the $23.8M shrunk median for 2020s/large (n=2); blended 75% with this actor's disclosed quote history ($25.0M personal, n=2); cap raised to similar-budget personal max within 50% of budget ($25.0M) | 2022 | Lead | $70,000,000 | – | $24,656,876 |
| Don't Look Up disclosed: Variety: $25M streaming salary | 2021 | Lead | $75,000,000 | $1,172,913 | $25,000,000 |
| Dark Phoenix no disclosed fee: modeled on the $15.8M shrunk median for 2010s/blockbuster (n=11); blended 75% with this actor's disclosed quote history ($20.0M personal, n=1) | 2019 | Lead | $200,000,000 | $244,676,878 | $18,769,515 |
| Red Sparrow no disclosed fee: modeled on the $20.0M shrunk median for 2010s/large (n=8); blended 75% with this actor's disclosed quote history ($20.0M personal, n=1); cap raised to similar-budget personal max within 50% of budget ($20.0M) | 2018 | Lead | $69,000,000 | $151,572,634 | $19,649,269 |
| Mother! no disclosed fee: modeled on the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3); personal blend cut to 41% on a smaller-than-usual budget; blended 41% with this actor's disclosed quote history ($20.0M personal, n=1); cap raised to similar-budget personal max within 50% of budget ($15.0M) | 2017 | Lead | $30,000,000 | $44,500,000 | $14,185,573 |
| A Beautiful Planet no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio) | 2016 | Supporting | $40,000,000 | $25,700,000 | $2,261,941 |
| Passengers disclosed: reported $20M, widely covered at the time | 2016 | Lead | $110,000,000 | $303,144,152 | $20,000,000 |
| X-Men: Apocalypse no disclosed fee: modeled on the $20.0M shrunk median for 2010s/tentpole (n=12); blended 75% with this actor's disclosed quote history ($20.0M personal, n=1) | 2016 | Lead | $178,000,000 | $543,934,105 | $18,733,101 |
| Joy no disclosed fee: modeled on the $20.0M shrunk median for 2010s/large (n=8); blended 75% with this actor's disclosed quote history ($20.0M personal, n=1); cap raised to similar-budget personal max within 50% of budget ($20.0M) | 2015 | Lead | $60,000,000 | $101,100,000 | $17,675,543 |
| The Hunger Games: Mockingjay – Part 2 no disclosed fee: modeled on the $20.0M shrunk median for 2010s/tentpole (n=12); blended 75% with this actor's disclosed quote history ($20.0M personal, n=1) | 2015 | Lead | $160,000,000 | $661,456,563 | $17,675,543 |
| Serena soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.79): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3), capped at $4.1M vs early terms | 2014 | Lead | $27,500,000 | $5,000,000 | $3,321,857 |
| The Hunger Games: Mockingjay – Part 1 soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.79): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $20.0M shrunk median for 2010s/tentpole (n=12), capped at $18.8M vs early terms | 2014 | Lead | $125,000,000 | $755,356,711 | $14,942,894 |
| X-Men: Days of Future Past soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.79): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $15.8M shrunk median for 2010s/blockbuster (n=11) vs early terms | 2014 | Lead | $210,000,000 | $746,045,700 | $12,561,875 |
| American Hustle soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.66): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3), capped at $6.0M vs early terms | 2013 | Lead | $40,000,000 | $251,000,000 | $4,057,830 |
| The Devil You Know soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.66): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3), capped at $6.0M vs early terms | 2013 | Lead | $40,000,000 | – | $4,057,830 |
| The Hunger Games: Catching Fire soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.66): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $20.0M shrunk median for 2010s/tentpole (n=12), capped at $19.5M vs early terms | 2013 | Lead | $130,000,000 | $865,011,746 | $13,054,371 |
| House at the End of the Street soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.50): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $5.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid), capped at $1.3M vs early terms | 2012 | Lead | $8,450,000 | $44,300,000 | $696,250 |
| Silver Linings Playbook soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.50): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3), capped at $3.1M vs early terms | 2012 | Lead | $21,000,000 | $236,412,453 | $1,712,500 |
| The Hunger Games (film) soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.50): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $20.0M shrunk median for 2010s/large (n=8), capped at $11.7M vs early terms | 2012 | Lead | $78,000,000 | $695,220,619 | $6,100,000 |
| Like Crazy soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.34): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $5.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid), capped at $0.0M vs early terms | 2011 | Lead | $250,000 | $3,800,000 | $37,500 |
| The Beaver (film) soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.34): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3), capped at $3.1M vs early terms | 2011 | Lead | $21,000,000 | $7,300,000 | $1,250,325 |
| X-Men: First Class soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.34): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $20.0M shrunk median for 2010s/tentpole (n=12) vs early terms | 2011 | Lead | $160,000,000 | $353,624,124 | $7,115,251 |
| Parachute (band) soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.21): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3), capped at $6.0M vs early terms | 2010 | Lead | $40,000,000 | – | $1,469,284 |
| Winter's Bone soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.21): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $5.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid), capped at $0.3M vs early terms | 2010 | Lead | $2,000,000 | $16,100,000 | $161,506 |
| Garden Party no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $19.4M shrunk median for 2000s/mid (n=2) (pre-stardom rate); soft-breakthrough weight 0.06 | 2008 | Lead | $40,000,000 | – | $842,721 |
| The Burning Plain no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $19.4M shrunk median for 2000s/mid (n=2) (pre-stardom rate); soft-breakthrough weight 0.06 | 2008 | Lead | $20,000,000 | $5,500,000 | $647,813 |
| Cold Case no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $19.4M shrunk median for 2000s/mid (n=2) (pre-stardom rate); soft-breakthrough weight 0.03 | 2007 | Lead | $40,000,000 | – | $674,362 |
| Medium no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $19.4M shrunk median for 2000s/mid (n=2) (pre-stardom rate); soft-breakthrough weight 0.03 | 2007 | Lead | $40,000,000 | – | $674,362 |
| The Bill Engvall Show no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $19.4M shrunk median for 2000s/mid (n=2) (pre-stardom rate); soft-breakthrough weight 0.03 | 2007 | Lead | $40,000,000 | – | $674,362 |
| Monk no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $19.4M shrunk median for 2000s/mid (n=2) (pre-stardom rate); soft-breakthrough weight 0.02 | 2006 | Lead | $40,000,000 | – | $583,580 |
كيفية عمل الأشكال النموذجية. An undisclosed lead role after the breakthrough gets the median of disclosed lead salaries for its era and budget band, capped at 15% of the film’s budget. Supporting and pre-breakthrough roles get 2.5% of that median, the documented going rate for actors before stardom. Films with no reported budget are treated as small productions. Undocumented backend, endorsements, and producer or director credits enter as separate estimated lines in the calculation above, built from disclosed medians. Every median comes from the published tables on our صفحة المنهجية.
صافي الثروة Over Time
الرصيد النموذجي في نهاية كل عام، مطابقًا للجدول السنوي أدناه.
سنة بعد سنة
| Year | Income | رسوم مندوب | معدل الضريبة | Spent | Saved | Balance |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | $35,835,801 | $5,375,370 | 45% | $9,234,384 | $7,518,853 | $150,727,833 |
| 2025 | $20,587,655 | $3,088,148 | 45% | $5,305,150 | $4,319,578 | $140,366,557 |
| 2024 | $6,449,170 | $967,376 | 45% | $1,661,861 | $1,353,126 | $126,810,011 |
| 2023 | $21,889,763 | $3,283,464 | 45% | $5,640,685 | $4,592,779 | $116,167,708 |
| 2022 | $28,458,311 | $4,268,747 | 45% | $7,333,308 | $5,970,952 | $102,408,216 |
| 2021 | $36,264,082 | $5,439,612 | 45% | $9,344,746 | $7,608,712 | $103,488,450 |
| 2020 | $4,072,848 | $610,927 | 45% | $1,049,516 | $854,541 | $88,433,749 |
| 2019 | $17,111,605 | $2,566,741 | 45% | $4,409,421 | $3,590,254 | $81,521,811 |
| 2018 | $23,618,573 | $3,542,786 | 45% | $6,086,176 | $4,955,507 | $70,436,227 |
| 2017 | $20,789,825 | $3,118,474 | 47% | $5,162,438 | $4,203,378 | $65,100,532 |
| 2016 | $44,929,497 | $6,739,425 | 47% | $11,156,695 | $9,084,043 | $56,589,899 |
| 2015 | $52,224,055 | $7,833,608 | 47% | $12,968,047 | $10,558,889 | $45,158,773 |
| 2014 | $52,686,802 | $7,903,020 | 47% | $13,082,955 | $10,652,449 | $33,779,300 |
| 2013 | $42,362,484 | $6,354,373 | 47% | $10,519,266 | $8,565,033 | $21,795,988 |
| 2012 | $28,782,099 | $4,317,315 | 43% | $7,686,444 | $6,258,483 | $12,116,531 |
| 2011 | $8,696,661 | $1,304,499 | 43% | $2,322,499 | $1,891,033 | $5,491,336 |
| 2010 | $3,873,287 | $580,993 | 43% | $1,034,386 | $842,221 | $3,467,164 |
| 2009 | $2,700,048 | $405,007 | 43% | $721,065 | $587,108 | $2,457,106 |
| 2008 | $3,224,408 | $483,661 | 43% | $861,099 | $701,127 | $1,706,933 |
| 2007 | $3,949,829 | $592,474 | 43% | $1,054,827 | $858,865 | $1,105,646 |
| 2006 | $1,045,432 | $156,815 | 43% | $279,189 | $227,322 | $236,079 |
| 2005 | $175,074 | $26,261 | 43% | $76,612 | $8,211 | $8,211 |
Model Notes
- RESIDENCE PROXY: public New York base in recent years
- salary comps: 2 disclosed lead fee(s) flagged as non-market outliers (scale / far-below-quote) and excluded from era medians
- رصيد الصورة: Wikimedia Commons via Wikipedia (Jennifer Lawrence)
المنهجية
We rebuild Jennifer’s career as a yearly time series. Disclosed salaries and documented backend enter as reported, with citations. Undisclosed lead roles get the median of disclosed salaries for their era and budget band, capped at 15% of the film’s budget. Supporting roles and roles from before the breakthrough get 2.5% of that median, the going-rate ratio measured from disclosed pre-stardom deals. Films with no reported budget are treated as small productions, and every role is estimated unless a source documents it was unpaid. Representation fees come out at sourced rates, taxes follow the eras actually lived through, spending follows measured household savings behavior unless court documents say otherwise, and what remains compounds at real market returns. Undocumented backend enters as an expected value from disclosed deals, endorsements at the median disclosed ambassador fee, and producer or director credits at union-scale floors.
النموذج الكامل، وكل جدول أسعار، وكيفية مقارنة تقديراتنا بالصفقات الحقيقية موجودة على الموقع صفحة المنهجية.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is Jennifer Lawrence's net worth in 2026?
As of 2026, Jennifer Lawrence's net worth is an estimated $150.7 Million. The estimate is built film by film from disclosed salaries and documented backend, then year by year: income, minus representation fees and taxes, minus spending, compounded at real market returns.
How does Jennifer Lawrence make money?
رواتب الأفلام والمشاركة الخلفية الموثقة.
How is Jennifer Lawrence's net worth calculated?
يتم إدخال أيام الدفع المفصح عنها كما ورد، مع الاستشهادات. تستخدم الأدوار الرئيسية غير المعلنة متوسط الرواتب المعلن عنها لعصرها ونطاق الميزانية، بحد أقصى 15% من ميزانية الفيلم، وتستخدم الأدوار الداعمة أو الأدوار المهنية المبكرة جزء ما قبل النجومية الموثق من هذا المتوسط. نحن نطرح رسوم التمثيل من المصادر، والضرائب على السنوات التي عملت فيها جينيفر فعليًا، والإنفاق من سلوك الادخار المُقاس، ثم نجمعها مع عوائد السوق الحقيقية. يتم إدخال الواجهة الخلفية والتأييدات والائتمانات غير الموثقة كخطوط تقديرية من الوسيطات التي تم الكشف عنها. يتم نشر كل معدل ومصدر.
How much does Jennifer Lawrence make per film?
ويختلف حسب الدور والعصر، ويسرد جدول كل فيلم على حدة الأجر المحسوب لكل عنوان. أيام الدفع المفصح عنها تدخل كما ورد. يتم تصميم الأدوار غير المكشوف عنها وفقًا لما كسبه الممثلون المشابهون في نفس العصر ونطاق الميزانية، حيث حققت الأدوار القيادية بعد الاختراق أكبر قدر من الأرباح والأدوار الداعمة أو المبكرة جزءًا موثقًا من ذلك.
لماذا معدل الضريبة مرتفع جدًا، ولا يتجنبه الممثلون من خلال شركة مُقرضة؟
يتم إصدار الضريبة بالمعدل الفعلي للمكان الذي تعيش فيه جينيفر كل عام، وهو المعدل الموضح في الجدول على أساس سنوي. في ولاية ذات ضرائب مرتفعة مثل كاليفورنيا، تصل ضريبة الدخل الفيدرالية وضريبة الولاية مجتمعة إلى ما يقرب من نصف دخل صاحب الدخل الأعلى، لذا فإن تلك السنوات تصل إلى منتصف الأربعينيات في المائة. إن شركة الإقراض، وهي الشركة التي يدير العديد من الممثلين دخلهم من خلالها، لا تخفض الضريبة على الأموال التي يأخذونها إلى وطنهم. وتتمثل ميزته الحقيقية في خصم تكاليف الأعمال مثل أتعاب الوكيل والمدير والمحامي، ويقوم النموذج بالفعل بطرح تلك التكاليف كخط منفصل قبل تطبيق أي ضريبة. كما يقع أصحاب الأداء المرتفع أيضًا خارج نطاق الخصم التجاري الذي يمكن لأصحاب الشركات الآخرين المطالبة به، لذلك لا يشتريهم أي تخفيض في أسعار الفائدة.
لماذا يختلف هذا الرقم عن المواقع الأخرى ذات القيمة الصافية؟
Most sites publish a single number with no way to check it. This estimate is built in the open: every salary, rate, and assumption is on the page, and the صفحة المنهجية lists every source.
ما مدى دقة هذا التقدير؟
لا يوجد تقدير دقيق لصافي قيمة الفرد؛ هذا النموذج مبني على البيانات العامة. الفرق هو أنه يمكنك رؤية كيفية بنائه والتحقق من كل خطوة. تُظهر درجة الثقة بالقرب من الجزء العلوي من العملية الحسابية مقدار الرقم الذي يعتمد على الأرقام التي تم الكشف عنها، وعلامات الصفحة حيث يعتمد الرقم على الافتراض.
Is Jennifer Lawrence rich compared to the average person?
Yes. A net worth of $150.7 Million is far above the median American household, which sits near $193,000 according to Federal Reserve data.
What is Jennifer Lawrence's biggest source of wealth?
On this page it is film salaries, the largest line in the calculation at $269.8 Million. The full breakdown, with every other line and its source, is above.
How much does Jennifer Lawrence make from endorsements?
The model counts $60.0 Million in career endorsement income for Jennifer: 3 named partnerships x the $5.0M annual fee from the median disclosed film deal, scaled 1.25x to this actor's quote vs era median x a 4-year term, spread across the deal years. It is an estimate, since the individual deal values are not all public, and it sits as its own line in the calculation above.
استكشاف الجهات الفاعلة الأخرى
حول NetWorth Explained
We originally created NWE because nobody in the public-figure net worth space showed their work. Magazines and sites threw out big numbers while hiding behind vague claims of “proprietary algorithms” أو “insider knowledge.” That’s why we started the world’s only publication that transparently showed every assumption, every variable, and every calculation. We’re still the only ones who do it this way. إقرأ المزيد عن NetWorth Explained.