Luke Hemsworth صافي الثروة 2026
آخر تحديث August 3, 2026
As of 2026, Luke Hemsworth has an estimated net worth of $19.2 Million, computed film by film and year by year from public records and published rates. Every input, rate, and source behind the number is on this page.
Calculation
- تم الكشف عن الرواتب والواجهة الخلفية الموثقة، مع ذكر كل منها
- الأدوار غير المكشوف عنها تم تصميمها من المقارنات التي تم الكشف عنها لعصرهم ونطاق الميزانية والمرحلة المهنية
- الواجهة الخلفية والتأييدات وإنتاج الاعتمادات المقدرة من الوسيطات التي تم الكشف عنها
Fast Facts
| Birthdate | غير متوفر |
|---|---|
| Birthplace | غير متوفر |
| Breakthrough | career breakthrough modeled at 2017 |
| Best Known | Westworld (2016) |
Who Is Luke Hemsworth?
Luke Hemsworth is best known for Westworld (2016). The earnings behind Luke's net worth come from film salaries, backend participation, and endorsement deals.
The model tracks Luke's earning years from 2003 to 2026, with the biggest single year in 2020 at about $7.8 Million of gross income. After representation fees, taxes, and living costs, what stays invested compounds at market returns into an estimated $19.2 Million today.
Data
يتم حساب كل سطر أدناه من البيانات العامة وجداول الأسعار المنشورة على موقعنا صفحة المنهجية. ثقة: الصف ج. لا تغطي الأرقام الموثقة سوى حصة صغيرة من هذا الرقم، لذا فإن معظمها تم تصميمه على أساس المعدلات المنشورة والمقارنات (تتراوح الدرجات من A، موثق في الغالب، إلى C، في الغالب على شكل نماذج).
The Calculation
| Line | Amount |
|---|---|
| Revenue | |
| Film pay, modeled lead roles (17 of 38 films) era and budget-band medians of disclosed lead salaries (winsorized, thin cells shrunk toward the era median), blended with this actor's disclosed quote history when available; soft breakthrough blend near the career break year | $36,832,876 |
| Film pay, modeled post-breakthrough supporting roles (3 of 38 films) 12.0% of lead cells: lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio | $6,267,992 |
| Film pay, modeled supporting and early roles (18 of 38 films) 2.5% من متوسطات العصر: معدل ما قبل النجومية | $7,413,135 |
| نقاط الواجهة الخلفية، المقدرة 12% of disclosed lead deals included points, at a median 2.6% of box office; expected value on 5 commercially viable undisclosed lead roles; cash spread over 3 years | $62,112 |
| الموافقات، المقدرة (شراكة علامة تجارية واحدة) 1 named partnerships x the $4.0M annual fee from the median disclosed film deal x a 4-year term, spread across the deal years | $16,000,000 |
| البقايا المقدرة SAG residual rates on post-theatrical receipts assumed at half of box office, split by role share and spread over the ten years after each release; 2 film(s) used band-specific box-office proxies | $3,007,900 |
| عوائد الاستثمار على الادخار mixed portfolio: 55% actual 60/40 securities returns (taxed) + 45% US long-run home-price rate on the rest | $5,295,557 |
| Expenses | |
| رسوم التمثيل الوكيل 10% + المحامي 5% | -$10,302,272 |
| Taxes المعدلات الفعلية للولايات المتحدة-كاليفورنيا، سنة بعد سنة | -$26,372,553 |
| الإنفاق الشخصي measured household savings rates by income, times a 88% entertainment-household factor | -$18,124,187 |
| القيمة الصافية المقدرة | $19,178,356 |
فيلم بعد فيلم
| Film | Year | Role | Budget | شباك التذاكر | تم احتساب الدفع |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beast no disclosed fee: modeled on the $25.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid), capped at $0.2M | 2026 | Lead | $1,300,000 | $1,300,000 | $195,000 |
| Deadloch no disclosed fee: modeled on the $25.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid); budget unreported, small-film terms | 2026 | Lead | – | – | $2,994,128 |
| Ithaqua no disclosed fee: modeled on the $25.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid); budget unreported, small-film terms | 2026 | Lead | – | – | $2,994,128 |
| The Terminal List: Dark Wolf no disclosed fee: modeled on the $25.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid); budget unreported, small-film terms | 2025 | Lead | – | – | $2,988,589 |
| Gunner no disclosed fee: modeled on the $25.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid); budget unreported, small-film terms | 2024 | Lead | – | – | $2,977,875 |
| Land of Bad no disclosed fee: modeled on the $21.7M shrunk median for 2020s/mid (n=1), capped at $3.0M | 2024 | Lead | $20,000,000 | $7,000,000 | $2,977,098 |
| Bad Hombres no disclosed fee: modeled on the $25.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid); budget unreported, small-film terms | 2023 | Lead | – | – | $2,957,283 |
| Next Goal Wins no disclosed fee: modeled on the $25.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid), capped at $2.1M | 2023 | Lead | $14,000,000 | $18,600,000 | $2,073,470 |
| Bosch & Rockit no disclosed fee: modeled on the $25.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid); budget unreported, small-film terms | 2022 | Lead | – | – | $2,918,193 |
| ثور: الحب والرعد no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $18.0M shrunk median for 2020s/blockbuster (n=8) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio) | 2022 | Supporting | $250,000,000 | $760,928,081 | $2,101,099 |
| Asking for It no disclosed fee: modeled on the $25.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid); budget unreported, small-film terms | 2021 | Lead | – | – | $2,845,698 |
| Young Rock no disclosed fee: modeled on the $25.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid); budget unreported, small-film terms | 2021 | Lead | – | – | $2,845,698 |
| Death of Me no disclosed fee: modeled on the $25.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid), capped at $0.0M | 2020 | Lead | $292,271 | $292,271 | $43,841 |
| The Very Excellent Mr. Dundee no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $25.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio); budget unreported, small-film terms | 2020 | Supporting | – | – | $2,716,893 |
| Crypto soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.79): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $5.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid); budget unreported, small-film terms vs early terms | 2019 | Lead | – | $20,440 | $2,400,250 |
| Encounter soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.66): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $5.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid); budget unreported, small-film terms vs early terms | 2018 | Lead | – | – | $2,024,675 |
| River Runs Red soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.66): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $5.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid), capped at $0.0M vs early terms | 2018 | Lead | $65,167 | $65,167 | $9,775 |
| We Are Boats soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.66): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $5.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid); budget unreported, small-film terms vs early terms | 2018 | Lead | – | – | $2,024,675 |
| Hickok soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.50): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $5.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid); budget unreported, small-film terms vs early terms | 2017 | Lead | – | – | $1,562,500 |
| ثور: راجناروك soft-breakthrough supporting blend (w=0.50) | 2017 | Supporting | $180,000,000 | $853,977,126 | $1,450,000 |
| Science Fiction Volume One: The Osiris Child soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.34): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $5.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid); budget unreported, small-film terms vs early terms | 2016 | Lead | – | $135,532 | $1,100,325 |
| Infini soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.21): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $5.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid), capped at $0.8M vs early terms | 2015 | Lead | $5,000,000 | – | $255,380 |
| Kill Me Three Times no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $5.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid) (pre-stardom rate); budget unreported, small-film terms; soft-breakthrough weight 0.12 | 2014 | Lead | – | $101,807 | $467,708 |
| The Anomaly no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $5.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid) (pre-stardom rate); soft-breakthrough weight 0.12 | 2014 | Lead | $11,600,000 | $11,600,000 | $317,513 |
| The Reckoning no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $5.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid) (pre-stardom rate); budget unreported, small-film terms; soft-breakthrough weight 0.12 | 2014 | Lead | – | – | $467,708 |
| Bikie Wars: Brothers in Arms no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $5.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid) (pre-stardom rate); soft-breakthrough weight 0.03 | 2012 | Lead | $6,000,000 | – | $151,695 |
| Westworld no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $5.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid) (pre-stardom rate); soft-breakthrough weight 0.03 | 2012 | Lead | $1,200,000 | $10,000,000 | $126,894 |
| Winners & Losers no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $5.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid) (pre-stardom rate); budget unreported, small-film terms; soft-breakthrough weight 0.03 | 2012 | Lead | – | – | $224,030 |
| The Bazura Project no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $5.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid) (pre-stardom rate); budget unreported, small-film terms; soft-breakthrough weight 0.02 | 2011 | Lead | – | – | $176,710 |
| Carla Cametti PD no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $18.8M median for its era and nearest band (mid) (pre-stardom rate); budget unreported, small-film terms; soft-breakthrough weight 0.00 | 2009 | Lead | – | – | $480,912 |
| Tangle no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $18.8M median for its era and nearest band (mid) (pre-stardom rate); budget unreported, small-film terms; soft-breakthrough weight 0.00 | 2009 | Lead | – | – | $480,912 |
| Neighbours no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $18.8M median for its era and nearest band (mid) (pre-stardom rate); budget unreported, small-film terms; soft-breakthrough weight 0.00 | 2008 | Lead | – | – | $475,009 |
| The Elephant Princess no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $18.8M median for its era and nearest band (mid) (pre-stardom rate); budget unreported, small-film terms; soft-breakthrough weight 0.00 | 2008 | Lead | – | – | $475,009 |
| Satisfaction no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $18.8M median for its era and nearest band (mid) (pre-stardom rate); budget unreported, small-film terms; soft-breakthrough weight 0.00 | 2007 | Lead | – | – | $471,967 |
| All Saints no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $18.8M median for its era and nearest band (mid) (pre-stardom rate), capped at 15% of budget; soft-breakthrough weight 0.00 | 2005 | Lead | $2,000,000 | $5,900,000 | $300,000 |
| Last Man Standing no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $20.0M shrunk median for 2000s/large (n=18) (pre-stardom rate); soft-breakthrough weight 0.00 | 2005 | Lead | $67,000,000 | $47,267,001 | $503,203 |
| Blue Heelers no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $18.8M median for its era and nearest band (mid) (pre-stardom rate); budget unreported, small-film terms; soft-breakthrough weight 0.00 | 2004 | Lead | – | – | $469,186 |
| The Saddle Club no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $18.8M median for its era and nearest band (mid) (pre-stardom rate); budget unreported, small-film terms; soft-breakthrough weight 0.00 | 2003 | Lead | – | – | $468,974 |
كيفية عمل الأشكال النموذجية. An undisclosed lead role after the breakthrough gets the median of disclosed lead salaries for its era and budget band, capped at 15% of the film’s budget. Supporting and pre-breakthrough roles get 2.5% of that median, the documented going rate for actors before stardom. Films with no reported budget are treated as small productions. Undocumented backend, endorsements, and producer or director credits enter as separate estimated lines in the calculation above, built from disclosed medians. Every median comes from the published tables on our صفحة المنهجية.
صافي الثروة Over Time
الرصيد النموذجي في نهاية كل عام، مطابقًا للجدول السنوي أدناه.
سنة بعد سنة
| Year | Income | رسوم مندوب | معدل الضريبة | Spent | Saved | Balance |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | $4,577,664 | $686,650 | 45% | $1,179,600 | $960,458 | $19,178,356 |
| 2025 | $4,217,441 | $632,616 | 45% | $1,086,775 | $884,878 | $17,856,308 |
| 2024 | $5,338,303 | $800,745 | 45% | $1,375,606 | $1,120,051 | $15,819,148 |
| 2023 | $5,570,216 | $835,532 | 45% | $1,435,367 | $1,168,709 | $13,610,735 |
| 2022 | $5,166,685 | $775,003 | 45% | $1,331,382 | $1,084,043 | $11,419,820 |
| 2021 | $5,633,741 | $845,061 | 45% | $1,451,736 | $1,182,038 | $11,091,497 |
| 2020 | $7,783,801 | $1,167,570 | 45% | $2,005,777 | $1,633,150 | $9,139,894 |
| 2019 | $6,651,954 | $997,793 | 45% | $1,714,115 | $1,395,673 | $6,987,541 |
| 2018 | $7,704,961 | $1,155,744 | 45% | $1,985,460 | $1,616,609 | $5,054,051 |
| 2017 | $7,346,947 | $1,102,042 | 47% | $1,824,361 | $1,485,438 | $3,417,485 |
| 2016 | $1,694,357 | $254,153 | 47% | $420,735 | $342,572 | $1,795,393 |
| 2015 | $557,420 | $83,613 | 47% | $169,354 | $81,764 | $1,381,042 |
| 2014 | $995,270 | $149,291 | 47% | $302,380 | $145,989 | $1,268,464 |
| 2013 | $417,484 | $62,623 | 47% | $148,355 | $39,722 | $1,057,881 |
| 2012 | $383,415 | $57,512 | 43% | $146,531 | $39,233 | $932,401 |
| 2011 | $306,064 | $45,910 | 43% | $116,970 | $31,318 | $837,256 |
| 2010 | $84,594 | $12,689 | 43% | $37,019 | $3,967 | $776,134 |
| 2009 | $704,858 | $105,729 | 43% | $230,310 | $111,194 | $722,795 |
| 2008 | $985,141 | $147,771 | 43% | $321,892 | $155,409 | $558,269 |
| 2007 | $788,554 | $118,283 | 43% | $257,657 | $124,397 | $442,849 |
| 2006 | $31,581 | $4,737 | 43% | $13,820 | $1,481 | $304,643 |
| 2005 | $803,203 | $120,480 | 43% | $262,444 | $126,708 | $284,261 |
| 2004 | $469,186 | $70,378 | 43% | $153,305 | $74,016 | $152,017 |
| 2003 | $468,974 | $70,346 | 43% | $153,236 | $73,982 | $73,982 |
Model Notes
- وكيل الإقامة: لم يتم الحصول على مكان الإقامة بشكل فردي لهذه الدفعة؛ يتم تطبيق الوضع الافتراضي US-CA حتى يتم توثيقه
- salary comps: 2 disclosed lead fee(s) flagged as non-market outliers (scale / far-below-quote) and excluded from era medians
- رصيد الصورة: Wikimedia Commons via Wikipedia (Luke Hemsworth)
المنهجية
We rebuild Luke’s career as a yearly time series. Disclosed salaries and documented backend enter as reported, with citations. Undisclosed lead roles get the median of disclosed salaries for their era and budget band, capped at 15% of the film’s budget. Supporting roles and roles from before the breakthrough get 2.5% of that median, the going-rate ratio measured from disclosed pre-stardom deals. Films with no reported budget are treated as small productions, and every role is estimated unless a source documents it was unpaid. Representation fees come out at sourced rates, taxes follow the eras actually lived through, spending follows measured household savings behavior unless court documents say otherwise, and what remains compounds at real market returns. Undocumented backend enters as an expected value from disclosed deals, endorsements at the median disclosed ambassador fee, and producer or director credits at union-scale floors.
النموذج الكامل، وكل جدول أسعار، وكيفية مقارنة تقديراتنا بالصفقات الحقيقية موجودة على الموقع صفحة المنهجية.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is Luke Hemsworth's net worth in 2026?
As of 2026, Luke Hemsworth's net worth is an estimated $19.2 Million. The estimate is built film by film from disclosed salaries and documented backend, then year by year: income, minus representation fees and taxes, minus spending, compounded at real market returns.
How does Luke Hemsworth make money?
رواتب الأفلام والمشاركة الخلفية الموثقة.
How is Luke Hemsworth's net worth calculated?
Disclosed paydays enter as reported, with citations. Undisclosed lead roles use the median of disclosed salaries for their era and budget band, capped at 15% of the film's budget, and supporting or early-career roles use the documented pre-stardom fraction of that median. We subtract sourced representation fees, taxes for the years Luke actually worked, and spending from measured savings behavior, then compound at real market returns. Undocumented backend, endorsements, and producing credits enter as estimated lines from disclosed medians. Every rate and source is published.
How much does Luke Hemsworth make per film?
ويختلف حسب الدور والعصر، ويسرد جدول كل فيلم على حدة الأجر المحسوب لكل عنوان. أيام الدفع المفصح عنها تدخل كما ورد. يتم تصميم الأدوار غير المكشوف عنها وفقًا لما كسبه الممثلون المشابهون في نفس العصر ونطاق الميزانية، حيث حققت الأدوار القيادية بعد الاختراق أكبر قدر من الأرباح والأدوار الداعمة أو المبكرة جزءًا موثقًا من ذلك.
لماذا معدل الضريبة مرتفع جدًا، ولا يتجنبه الممثلون من خلال شركة مُقرضة؟
Tax comes out at the effective rate for where Luke lived each year, which is the rate shown in the year-by-year table. In a high-tax state like California, combined federal and state income tax reaches close to half of a top earner's income, so those years run in the mid-40s percent. A loan-out company, the corporation many actors run their income through, does not lower the tax on the money they take home. Its real advantage is deducting business costs such as agent, manager, and attorney fees, and the model already subtracts those as a separate line before any tax is applied. High-earning performers also fall outside the pass-through business deduction that other company owners can claim, so it buys them no rate cut.
لماذا يختلف هذا الرقم عن المواقع الأخرى ذات القيمة الصافية؟
Most sites publish a single number with no way to check it. This estimate is built in the open: every salary, rate, and assumption is on the page, and the صفحة المنهجية lists every source.
ما مدى دقة هذا التقدير؟
لا يوجد تقدير دقيق لصافي قيمة الفرد؛ هذا النموذج مبني على البيانات العامة. الفرق هو أنه يمكنك رؤية كيفية بنائه والتحقق من كل خطوة. تُظهر درجة الثقة بالقرب من الجزء العلوي من العملية الحسابية مقدار الرقم الذي يعتمد على الأرقام التي تم الكشف عنها، وعلامات الصفحة حيث يعتمد الرقم على الافتراض.
Is Luke Hemsworth rich compared to the average person?
Yes. A net worth of $19.2 Million is far above the median American household, which sits near $193,000 according to Federal Reserve data.
What is Luke Hemsworth's biggest source of wealth?
On this page it is film salaries, the largest line in the calculation at $36.8 Million. The full breakdown, with every other line and its source, is above.
How much does Luke Hemsworth make from endorsements?
The model counts $16.0 Million in career endorsement income for Luke: 1 named partnerships x the $4.0M annual fee from the median disclosed film deal x a 4-year term, spread across the deal years. It is an estimate, since the individual deal values are not all public, and it sits as its own line in the calculation above.
استكشاف الجهات الفاعلة الأخرى
حول NetWorth Explained
We originally created NWE because nobody in the public-figure net worth space showed their work. Magazines and sites threw out big numbers while hiding behind vague claims of “proprietary algorithms” أو “insider knowledge.” That’s why we started the world’s only publication that transparently showed every assumption, every variable, and every calculation. We’re still the only ones who do it this way. إقرأ المزيد عن NetWorth Explained.