Anthony Mackie Nettovermögen 2026
Zuletzt aktualisiert August 3, 2026
As of 2026, Anthony Mackie has an estimated net worth of $165.1 Million, computed film by film and year by year from public records and published rates. Every input, rate, and source behind the number is on this page.
Calculation
- Offengelegte Gehälter und dokumentiertes Backend, jeweils mit Zitat
- Nicht offengelegte Rollen, modelliert aus offengelegten Vergleichswerten für ihre Ära, Budgetspanne und Karrierephase
- Backend, Vermerke und Produktions-Credits, geschätzt anhand der offengelegten Mediane
Fast Facts
| Birthdate | September 23, 1978 |
|---|---|
| Birthplace | New Orleans |
| Breakthrough | The Hurt Locker (2008) |
| Best Known | Captain America: The Winter Soldier (2014) |
Who Is Anthony Mackie?
Anthony Mackie was born September 23, 1978 in New Orleans, best known for Captain America: The Winter Soldier (2014). The earnings behind Anthony's net worth come from film salaries, backend participation, and endorsement deals.
The model tracks Anthony's earning years from 2001 to 2026, with the biggest single year in 2025 at about $52.1 Million of gross income. After representation fees, taxes, and living costs, what stays invested compounds at market returns into an estimated $165.1 Million today.
Data
Jede Zeile unten wurde aus öffentlichen Daten und den veröffentlichten Tariftabellen auf unserer Website berechnet Methodenseite. Vertrauen: Klasse C. Dokumentierte Zahlen decken nur einen kleinen Teil dieser Zahl ab, daher wird der Großteil davon anhand veröffentlichter Zinssätze und Vergleichswerte modelliert (die Noten reichen von A, größtenteils dokumentiert, bis C, größtenteils modelliert).
The Calculation
| Line | Amount |
|---|---|
| Revenue | |
| Film pay, modeled lead roles (41 of 99 films) era and budget-band medians of disclosed lead salaries (winsorized, thin cells shrunk toward the era median), blended with this actor's disclosed quote history when available; soft breakthrough blend near the career break year | $305,729,591 |
| Film pay, modeled post-breakthrough supporting roles (6 of 99 films) 12.0% of lead cells: lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio | $14,796,886 |
| Film pay, modeled supporting and early roles (52 of 99 films) 2,5 % des Ära-Medians: die Prä-Stardom-Rate | $44,401,883 |
| Backend-Punkte, geschätzt 12% of disclosed lead deals included points, at a median 2.6% of box office; expected value on 33 commercially viable undisclosed lead roles; cash spread over 3 years; 21 film(s) used band-specific box-office/budget multiples as a gross proxy | $35,403,334 |
| Empfehlungen, geschätzt (1 Markenpartnerschaften) 1 named partnerships x the $4.0M annual fee from the median disclosed film deal x a 4-year term, spread across the deal years | $16,000,000 |
| Restbestände, geschätzt SAG residual rates on post-theatrical receipts assumed at half of box office, split by role share and spread over the ten years after each release; 51 film(s) used band-specific box-office proxies | $91,538,093 |
| TV: Himself/host Awards show; guest default per credited year; network not identified, priced on the broadcast cell; priced from tv_episode_rates.csv (en.wikipedia.org) | $30,000 |
| Anlagerenditen aus Ersparnissen mixed portfolio: 55% actual 60/40 securities returns (taxed) + 45% US long-run home-price rate on the rest | $52,657,860 |
| Expenses | |
| Vertretungsgebühren Agent 10 % + Anwalt 5 % | -$72,910,335 |
| Taxes US-LA effective rates, year by year | -$162,550,854 |
| Persönliche Ausgaben measured household savings rates by income, times a 88% entertainment-household factor | -$138,162,922 |
| Geschätztes Nettovermögen | $165,102,647 |
Film für Film
| Film | Year | Role | Budget | Theaterkasse | Bezahlung gezählt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Avengers: Weltuntergang no disclosed fee: modeled on the $23.8M shrunk median for 2020s/large (n=2), capped at $10.5M | 2026 | Lead | $70,000,000 | – | $10,496,678 |
| Barracuda no disclosed fee: modeled on the $23.8M shrunk median for 2020s/large (n=2), capped at $10.5M | 2026 | Lead | $70,000,000 | – | $10,496,678 |
| Speed-the-Plow no disclosed fee: modeled on the $23.8M shrunk median for 2020s/large (n=2), capped at $10.5M | 2026 | Lead | $70,000,000 | – | $10,496,678 |
| 12 12 12 no disclosed fee: modeled on the $23.8M shrunk median for 2020s/large (n=2), capped at $10.5M | 2025 | Lead | $70,000,000 | – | $10,493,532 |
| Captain America: Brave New World no disclosed fee: modeled on the $16.4M shrunk median for 2020s/tentpole (n=5) | 2025 | Lead | $180,000,000 | $415,000,000 | $16,418,112 |
| Desert Warrior no disclosed fee: modeled on the $16.4M shrunk median for 2020s/tentpole (n=5) | 2025 | Lead | $150,000,000 | $733,940 | $16,418,112 |
| Sneaks no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $23.8M shrunk median for 2020s/large (n=2) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio) | 2025 | Supporting | $70,000,000 | $1,500,000 | $2,848,527 |
| The Electric State no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $18.0M shrunk median for 2020s/blockbuster (n=8) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio) | 2025 | Supporting | $320,000,000 | – | $2,158,883 |
| Das Studio no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $23.8M shrunk median for 2020s/large (n=2) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio) | 2025 | Supporting | $70,000,000 | – | $2,848,527 |
| Elevation no disclosed fee: modeled on the $25.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid), capped at $2.7M | 2024 | Lead | $18,000,000 | $3,600,000 | $2,697,363 |
| Ghosted no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $23.8M shrunk median for 2020s/large (n=2) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio) | 2023 | Supporting | $70,000,000 | – | $2,844,421 |
| If You Were the Last no disclosed fee: modeled on the $23.8M shrunk median for 2020s/large (n=2), capped at $10.5M | 2023 | Lead | $70,000,000 | – | $10,475,506 |
| Rennervations no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $23.8M shrunk median for 2020s/large (n=2) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio) | 2023 | Supporting | $70,000,000 | – | $2,844,421 |
| Twisted Metal no disclosed fee: modeled on the $23.8M shrunk median for 2020s/large (n=2), capped at $10.5M | 2023 | Lead | $70,000,000 | – | $10,475,506 |
| We Have a Ghost no disclosed fee: modeled on the $23.8M shrunk median for 2020s/large (n=2), capped at $7.7M | 2023 | Lead | $51,000,000 | – | $7,632,553 |
| Avengers: Quantum Encounter no disclosed fee: modeled on the $23.8M shrunk median for 2020s/large (n=2), capped at $10.5M | 2022 | Lead | $70,000,000 | – | $10,452,403 |
| Best Duo (shared with Sebastian Stan) no disclosed fee: modeled on the $23.8M shrunk median for 2020s/large (n=2), capped at $10.5M | 2021 | Lead | $70,000,000 | – | $10,407,714 |
| Outside the Wire no disclosed fee: modeled on the $23.8M shrunk median for 2020s/large (n=2), capped at $10.5M | 2021 | Lead | $70,000,000 | – | $10,407,714 |
| Solos no disclosed fee: modeled on the $23.8M shrunk median for 2020s/large (n=2), capped at $10.5M | 2021 | Lead | $70,000,000 | – | $10,407,714 |
| The Falcon and the Winter Soldier no disclosed fee: modeled on the $23.8M shrunk median for 2020s/large (n=2), capped at $10.5M | 2021 | Lead | $70,000,000 | – | $10,407,714 |
| The Woman in the Window no disclosed fee: modeled on the $21.7M shrunk median for 2020s/mid (n=1), capped at $6.0M | 2021 | Lead | $40,000,000 | – | $5,949,150 |
| Altered Carbon no disclosed fee: modeled on the $23.8M shrunk median for 2020s/large (n=2), capped at $10.5M | 2020 | Lead | $70,000,000 | – | $10,321,824 |
| The Banker no disclosed fee: modeled on the $25.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid), capped at $1.6M | 2020 | Lead | $11,000,000 | – | $1,631,564 |
| Avengers: Endgame no disclosed fee: modeled on the $15.8M shrunk median for 2010s/blockbuster (n=11) | 2019 | Lead | $356,000,000 | $2,797,501,328 | $15,239,636 |
| Black Mirror no disclosed fee: modeled on the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3), capped at $6.0M | 2019 | Lead | $40,000,000 | – | $5,802,801 |
| Io no disclosed fee: modeled on the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3), capped at $6.0M | 2019 | Lead | $40,000,000 | – | $5,802,801 |
| Miss Bala no disclosed fee: modeled on the $5.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid), capped at $2.2M | 2019 | Lead | $15,000,000 | $15,400,000 | $2,176,804 |
| Point Blank no disclosed fee: modeled on the $5.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid), capped at $1.8M | 2019 | Lead | $12,000,000 | – | $1,742,304 |
| Seberg no disclosed fee: modeled on the $5.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid), capped at $1.2M | 2019 | Lead | $8,000,000 | $1,265,119 | $1,162,971 |
| Synchronic no disclosed fee: modeled on the $5.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid), capped at $0.4M | 2019 | Lead | $2,500,000 | $1,500,000 | $366,389 |
| Animals no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio) | 2018 | Supporting | $40,000,000 | – | $1,252,107 |
| Avengers: Infinity War no disclosed fee: modeled on the $15.8M shrunk median for 2010s/blockbuster (n=11) | 2018 | Lead | $400,000,000 | $2,048,359,754 | $14,770,330 |
| NBA 2K19 no disclosed fee: modeled on the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3), capped at $6.0M | 2018 | Lead | $40,000,000 | – | $5,628,052 |
| The Hate U Give no disclosed fee: modeled on the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3), capped at $3.5M | 2018 | Lead | $23,000,000 | $34,900,000 | $3,243,723 |
| Detroit no disclosed fee: modeled on the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3), capped at $5.1M | 2017 | Lead | $34,000,000 | $24,100,000 | $4,524,846 |
| All the Way soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.79): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3), capped at $6.0M vs early terms | 2016 | Lead | $40,000,000 | – | $4,805,716 |
| Captain America: Bürgerkrieg soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.79): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $15.8M shrunk median for 2010s/blockbuster (n=11) vs early terms | 2016 | Lead | $250,000,000 | $1,153,296,293 | $12,561,875 |
| Triple 9 soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.79): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3), capped at $4.2M vs early terms | 2016 | Lead | $28,000,000 | $23,100,000 | $3,381,212 |
| Ant-Man soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.66): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $20.0M shrunk median for 2010s/tentpole (n=12), capped at $19.5M vs early terms | 2015 | Lead | $130,000,000 | $519,311,965 | $13,054,371 |
| Avengers: Age of Ultron soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.66): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $15.8M shrunk median for 2010s/blockbuster (n=11) vs early terms | 2015 | Lead | $250,000,000 | $1,402,805,868 | $10,553,360 |
| Love the Coopers soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.66): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $5.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid), capped at $2.5M vs early terms | 2015 | Lead | $17,000,000 | $42,400,000 | $1,727,334 |
| Our Brand Is Crisis soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.66): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3), capped at $4.2M vs early terms | 2015 | Lead | $28,000,000 | $8,600,000 | $2,868,469 |
| The Night Before soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.66): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3), capped at $4.3M vs early terms | 2015 | Lead | $29,000,000 | $52,400,000 | $2,967,582 |
| Black or White soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.50): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $5.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid), capped at $1.4M vs early terms | 2014 | Lead | $9,000,000 | $21,700,000 | $737,500 |
| Captain America: The Winter Soldier soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.50): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $20.0M shrunk median for 2010s/tentpole (n=12) vs early terms | 2014 | Lead | $170,000,000 | $714,421,503 | $10,250,000 |
| Playing It Cool soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.50): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3), capped at $6.0M vs early terms | 2014 | Lead | $40,000,000 | $1,300,000 | $3,137,500 |
| Shelter soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.50): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3), capped at $6.0M vs early terms | 2014 | Lead | $40,000,000 | – | $3,137,500 |
| Gangster Squad soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.34): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $20.0M shrunk median for 2010s/large (n=8), capped at $10.1M vs early terms | 2013 | Lead | $67,500,000 | $105,200,000 | $3,765,220 |
| Pain & Gain soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.34): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3), capped at $3.9M vs early terms | 2013 | Lead | $26,000,000 | $86,200,000 | $1,504,758 |
| Repentance soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.34): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3), capped at $6.0M vs early terms | 2013 | Lead | $40,000,000 | $1,189,612 | $2,217,170 |
| Runner Runner soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.34): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3), capped at $4.5M vs early terms | 2013 | Lead | $30,000,000 | $62,700,000 | $1,708,304 |
| The Fifth Estate soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.34): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3), capped at $4.2M vs early terms | 2013 | Lead | $28,000,000 | $8,600,000 | $1,606,531 |
| The Inevitable Defeat of Mister & Pete soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.34): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3), capped at $6.0M vs early terms | 2013 | Lead | $40,000,000 | $506,303 | $2,217,170 |
| Top Chef: New Orleans soft-breakthrough supporting blend (w=0.34) | 2013 | Supporting | $40,000,000 | – | $629,510 |
| Abraham Lincoln: Vampire Hunter soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.21): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $20.0M shrunk median for 2010s/large (n=8), capped at $12.6M vs early terms | 2012 | Lead | $84,250,000 | $116,400,000 | $3,031,986 |
| Man on a Ledge soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.21): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3), capped at $6.3M vs early terms | 2012 | Lead | $42,000,000 | $47,600,000 | $1,531,866 |
| 10 Years no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3) (pre-stardom rate); soft-breakthrough weight 0.12 | 2011 | Lead | $40,000,000 | $987,640 | $957,437 |
| Real Steel no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $20.0M shrunk median for 2010s/tentpole (n=12) (pre-stardom rate); soft-breakthrough weight 0.12 | 2011 | Lead | $110,000,000 | $299,268,508 | $2,407,247 |
| The Adjustment Bureau no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $20.0M shrunk median for 2010s/large (n=8) (pre-stardom rate); soft-breakthrough weight 0.12 | 2011 | Lead | $62,000,000 | $127,800,000 | $1,548,986 |
| What's Your Number? no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3) (pre-stardom rate); soft-breakthrough weight 0.12 | 2011 | Lead | $20,000,000 | $30,400,000 | $599,828 |
| 30 for 30 no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3) (pre-stardom rate) | 2010 | Supporting | $40,000,000 | – | $342,893 |
| A Behanding in Spokane no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3) (pre-stardom rate); soft-breakthrough weight 0.06 | 2010 | Lead | $40,000,000 | – | $646,948 |
| Night Catches Us no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3) (pre-stardom rate); soft-breakthrough weight 0.06 | 2010 | Lead | $40,000,000 | – | $646,948 |
| Outstanding Ensemble no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3) (pre-stardom rate); soft-breakthrough weight 0.06 | 2010 | Lead | $40,000,000 | – | $646,948 |
| African-American Film Critics Association no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $19.4M shrunk median for 2000s/mid (n=2) (pre-stardom rate) | 2009 | Supporting | $40,000,000 | – | $547,776 |
| Alliance of Women Film Journalists no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $19.4M shrunk median for 2000s/mid (n=2) (pre-stardom rate); soft-breakthrough weight 0.03 | 2009 | Lead | $40,000,000 | – | $674,362 |
| American Violet no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $19.4M shrunk median for 2000s/mid (n=2) (pre-stardom rate); soft-breakthrough weight 0.03 | 2009 | Lead | $40,000,000 | – | $674,362 |
| Desert Flower no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $19.4M shrunk median for 2000s/mid (n=2) (pre-stardom rate); soft-breakthrough weight 0.03 | 2009 | Lead | $40,000,000 | $14,631,377 | $674,362 |
| Notorious no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $19.4M shrunk median for 2000s/mid (n=2) (pre-stardom rate); soft-breakthrough weight 0.03 | 2009 | Lead | $20,000,000 | $44,400,000 | $571,026 |
| Online Film Critics Society no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $19.4M shrunk median for 2000s/mid (n=2) (pre-stardom rate) | 2009 | Supporting | $40,000,000 | – | $547,776 |
| The Bacchae no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $19.4M shrunk median for 2000s/mid (n=2) (pre-stardom rate); soft-breakthrough weight 0.03 | 2009 | Lead | $40,000,000 | – | $674,362 |
| The Hurt Locker no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $18.8M median for its era and nearest band (mid) (pre-stardom rate); soft-breakthrough weight 0.03 | 2009 | Lead | $15,000,000 | $49,900,000 | $530,106 |
| Washington D.C. Area Film Critics Association no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $19.4M shrunk median for 2000s/mid (n=2) (pre-stardom rate); soft-breakthrough weight 0.03 | 2009 | Lead | $40,000,000 | – | $674,362 |
| Eagle Eye no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $20.0M shrunk median for 2000s/large (n=18) (pre-stardom rate); soft-breakthrough weight 0.02 | 2008 | Lead | $80,000,000 | $178,000,000 | $706,841 |
| The Good Negro no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $19.4M shrunk median for 2000s/mid (n=2) (pre-stardom rate); soft-breakthrough weight 0.02 | 2008 | Lead | $40,000,000 | – | $583,580 |
| Ascension Day no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $19.4M shrunk median for 2000s/mid (n=2) (pre-stardom rate); soft-breakthrough weight 0.01 | 2007 | Lead | $40,000,000 | – | $535,758 |
| Crossover no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $18.8M median for its era and nearest band (mid) (pre-stardom rate); soft-breakthrough weight 0.00 | 2006 | Lead | $5,800,000 | $7,000,000 | $470,678 |
| Freedomland no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $19.4M shrunk median for 2000s/mid (n=2) (pre-stardom rate); soft-breakthrough weight 0.00 | 2006 | Lead | $30,000,000 | $14,700,000 | $503,669 |
| Half Nelson no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $18.8M median for its era and nearest band (mid) (pre-stardom rate), capped at 15% of budget; soft-breakthrough weight 0.00 | 2006 | Lead | $700,000 | $4,900,000 | $105,000 |
| Heavens Fall no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $19.4M shrunk median for 2000s/mid (n=2) (pre-stardom rate); soft-breakthrough weight 0.00 | 2006 | Lead | $40,000,000 | – | $510,876 |
| Sucker Free City no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $19.4M shrunk median for 2000s/mid (n=2) (pre-stardom rate); soft-breakthrough weight 0.00 | 2006 | Lead | $40,000,000 | – | $510,876 |
| We Are Marshall no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $20.0M shrunk median for 2000s/large (n=18) (pre-stardom rate); soft-breakthrough weight 0.00 | 2006 | Lead | $65,000,000 | $43,500,000 | $544,444 |
| A Soldier's Play no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $19.4M shrunk median for 2000s/mid (n=2) (pre-stardom rate); soft-breakthrough weight 0.00 | 2005 | Lead | $40,000,000 | – | $498,013 |
| McReele no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $19.4M shrunk median for 2000s/mid (n=2) (pre-stardom rate); soft-breakthrough weight 0.00 | 2005 | Lead | $40,000,000 | – | $498,013 |
| The Man no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $19.4M shrunk median for 2000s/mid (n=2) (pre-stardom rate); soft-breakthrough weight 0.00 | 2005 | Lead | $20,000,000 | $10,300,000 | $490,595 |
| Brother to Brother no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $19.4M shrunk median for 2000s/mid (n=2) (pre-stardom rate); soft-breakthrough weight 0.00 | 2004 | Lead | $40,000,000 | $80,906 | $491,385 |
| Drowning Crow no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $19.4M shrunk median for 2000s/mid (n=2) (pre-stardom rate); soft-breakthrough weight 0.00 | 2004 | Lead | $40,000,000 | – | $491,385 |
| Haven no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $19.4M shrunk median for 2000s/mid (n=2) (pre-stardom rate); soft-breakthrough weight 0.00 | 2004 | Lead | $40,000,000 | – | $491,385 |
| Million Dollar Baby no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $19.4M shrunk median for 2000s/mid (n=2) (pre-stardom rate); soft-breakthrough weight 0.00 | 2004 | Lead | $30,000,000 | $217,000,000 | $489,479 |
| She Hate Me no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $18.8M median for its era and nearest band (mid) (pre-stardom rate); soft-breakthrough weight 0.00 | 2004 | Lead | $9,000,000 | $1,500,000 | $469,870 |
| Sucker Free City no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $19.4M shrunk median for 2000s/mid (n=2) (pre-stardom rate); soft-breakthrough weight 0.00 | 2004 | Lead | $40,000,000 | – | $491,385 |
| The Manchurian Candidate no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $20.0M shrunk median for 2000s/large (n=18) (pre-stardom rate); soft-breakthrough weight 0.00 | 2004 | Lead | $80,000,000 | $96,100,000 | $514,617 |
| Crossing no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $19.4M shrunk median for 2000s/mid (n=2) (pre-stardom rate); soft-breakthrough weight 0.00 | 2003 | Lead | $40,000,000 | – | $487,977 |
| Hollywood Homicide no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $20.0M shrunk median for 2000s/large (n=18) (pre-stardom rate); soft-breakthrough weight 0.00 | 2003 | Lead | $75,000,000 | $51,100,000 | $507,019 |
| Ma Rainey's Black Bottom no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $19.4M shrunk median for 2000s/mid (n=2) (pre-stardom rate); soft-breakthrough weight 0.00 | 2003 | Lead | $40,000,000 | – | $487,977 |
| 8 Mile no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $19.4M shrunk median for 2000s/mid (n=2) (pre-stardom rate); soft-breakthrough weight 0.00 | 2002 | Lead | $41,000,000 | $242,900,000 | $486,275 |
| As If no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $19.4M shrunk median for 2000s/mid (n=2) (pre-stardom rate) | 2002 | Supporting | $40,000,000 | – | $484,992 |
| Talk no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $19.4M shrunk median for 2000s/mid (n=2) (pre-stardom rate); soft-breakthrough weight 0.00 | 2002 | Lead | $40,000,000 | – | $486,225 |
| Tupac Shakur no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $19.4M shrunk median for 2000s/mid (n=2) (pre-stardom rate); soft-breakthrough weight 0.00 | 2001 | Lead | $40,000,000 | – | $485,325 |
So funktionieren die modellierten Figuren. An undisclosed lead role after the breakthrough gets the median of disclosed lead salaries for its era and budget band, capped at 15% of the film’s budget. Supporting and pre-breakthrough roles get 2.5% of that median, the documented going rate for actors before stardom. Films with no reported budget are treated as small productions. Undocumented backend, endorsements, and producer or director credits enter as separate estimated lines in the calculation above, built from disclosed medians. Every median comes from the published tables on our Methodenseite.
Nettovermögen Over Time
Modellierter Saldo am Ende jedes Jahres, entsprechend der unten aufgeführten Jahrestabelle.
Von Jahr zu Jahr
| Year | Income | Vertretungsgebühren | Steuersatz | Spent | Saved | Balance |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | $28,293,577 | $4,244,037 | 36% | $8,483,908 | $6,907,798 | $165,102,647 |
| 2025 | $52,143,980 | $7,821,597 | 36% | $15,635,518 | $12,730,807 | $155,054,986 |
| 2024 | $24,164,527 | $3,624,679 | 37% | $7,132,585 | $5,807,519 | $132,475,475 |
| 2023 | $32,282,895 | $4,842,434 | 37% | $9,528,865 | $7,758,626 | $117,104,111 |
| 2022 | $24,840,478 | $3,726,072 | 37% | $7,332,104 | $5,969,972 | $100,179,979 |
| 2021 | $46,467,565 | $6,970,135 | 37% | $13,715,720 | $11,167,661 | $101,098,343 |
| 2020 | $34,194,828 | $5,129,224 | 37% | $10,093,205 | $8,218,125 | $82,807,147 |
| 2019 | $36,067,350 | $5,410,103 | 37% | $10,645,913 | $8,668,153 | $69,330,420 |
| 2018 | $34,068,153 | $5,110,223 | 37% | $10,055,815 | $8,187,681 | $54,706,147 |
| 2017 | $21,477,858 | $3,221,679 | 45% | $5,534,543 | $4,506,355 | $46,248,375 |
| 2016 | $26,931,121 | $4,039,668 | 45% | $6,939,773 | $5,650,526 | $38,732,159 |
| 2015 | $36,731,032 | $5,509,655 | 45% | $9,465,073 | $7,706,685 | $31,420,124 |
| 2014 | $27,894,315 | $4,184,147 | 45% | $7,187,974 | $5,852,618 | $23,148,433 |
| 2013 | $16,315,367 | $2,447,305 | 45% | $4,204,242 | $3,423,192 | $16,282,613 |
| 2012 | $8,970,286 | $1,345,543 | 41% | $2,479,628 | $2,018,971 | $11,754,231 |
| 2011 | $6,678,780 | $1,001,817 | 41% | $1,846,194 | $1,503,214 | $9,109,943 |
| 2010 | $4,568,254 | $685,238 | 41% | $1,262,788 | $1,028,191 | $7,320,314 |
| 2009 | $5,647,788 | $847,168 | 41% | $1,561,200 | $1,271,166 | $5,879,233 |
| 2008 | $3,491,324 | $523,699 | 41% | $965,096 | $785,803 | $4,194,710 |
| 2007 | $1,638,130 | $245,720 | 41% | $452,823 | $368,699 | $3,747,286 |
| 2006 | $2,763,924 | $414,589 | 41% | $764,023 | $622,085 | $3,228,978 |
| 2005 | $2,496,478 | $374,472 | 41% | $690,093 | $561,890 | $2,440,132 |
| 2004 | $4,236,227 | $635,434 | 41% | $1,171,007 | $953,461 | $1,811,110 |
| 2003 | $1,720,335 | $258,050 | 41% | $475,547 | $387,201 | $812,409 |
| 2002 | $1,499,001 | $224,850 | 45% | $386,271 | $314,511 | $386,161 |
| 2001 | $485,325 | $72,799 | 45% | $153,014 | $73,875 | $73,875 |
Model Notes
- RESIDENCE PROXY: public New Orleans base; LA rates
- salary comps: 2 disclosed lead fee(s) flagged as non-market outliers (scale / far-below-quote) and excluded from era medians
- Bildnachweis: Wikimedia Commons via Wikipedia (Anthony Mackie)
Methodik
We rebuild Anthony’s career as a yearly time series. Disclosed salaries and documented backend enter as reported, with citations. Undisclosed lead roles get the median of disclosed salaries for their era and budget band, capped at 15% of the film’s budget. Supporting roles and roles from before the breakthrough get 2.5% of that median, the going-rate ratio measured from disclosed pre-stardom deals. Films with no reported budget are treated as small productions, and every role is estimated unless a source documents it was unpaid. Representation fees come out at sourced rates, taxes follow the eras actually lived through, spending follows measured household savings behavior unless court documents say otherwise, and what remains compounds at real market returns. Undocumented backend enters as an expected value from disclosed deals, endorsements at the median disclosed ambassador fee, and producer or director credits at union-scale floors.
Das vollständige Modell, alle Tariftabellen und wie unsere Schätzungen mit echten Angeboten verglichen wurden, finden Sie hier Methodenseite.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is Anthony Mackie's net worth in 2026?
As of 2026, Anthony Mackie's net worth is an estimated $165.1 Million. The estimate is built film by film from disclosed salaries and documented backend, then year by year: income, minus representation fees and taxes, minus spending, compounded at real market returns.
How does Anthony Mackie make money?
Filmgehälter und dokumentierte Backend-Beteiligung.
How is Anthony Mackie's net worth calculated?
Disclosed paydays enter as reported, with citations. Undisclosed lead roles use the median of disclosed salaries for their era and budget band, capped at 15% of the film's budget, and supporting or early-career roles use the documented pre-stardom fraction of that median. We subtract sourced representation fees, taxes for the years Anthony actually worked, and spending from measured savings behavior, then compound at real market returns. Undocumented backend, endorsements, and producing credits enter as estimated lines from disclosed medians. Every rate and source is published.
How much does Anthony Mackie make per film?
Es variiert je nach Rolle und Epoche, und in der Film-für-Film-Tabelle oben sind die für jeden Titel gezählten Gehälter aufgeführt. Offengelegte Zahltage werden wie gemeldet erfasst. Ungenannte Rollen basieren auf dem, was vergleichbare Schauspieler in der gleichen Zeit und mit demselben Budget verdienten, wobei Hauptrollen nach dem Durchbruch am meisten verdienten und Neben- oder Frührollen einen dokumentierten Bruchteil davon verdienten.
Warum ist der Steuersatz so hoch und vermeiden Schauspieler ihn nicht bei einer Darlehensgesellschaft?
Tax comes out at the effective rate for where Anthony lived each year, which is the rate shown in the year-by-year table. In a high-tax state like California, combined federal and state income tax reaches close to half of a top earner's income, so those years run in the mid-40s percent. A loan-out company, the corporation many actors run their income through, does not lower the tax on the money they take home. Its real advantage is deducting business costs such as agent, manager, and attorney fees, and the model already subtracts those as a separate line before any tax is applied. High-earning performers also fall outside the pass-through business deduction that other company owners can claim, so it buys them no rate cut.
Warum unterscheidet sich diese Zahl von anderen vermögenden Websites?
Most sites publish a single number with no way to check it. This estimate is built in the open: every salary, rate, and assumption is on the page, and the Methodenseite lists every source.
Wie genau ist diese Schätzung?
Keine Schätzung des Nettovermögens einer Privatperson ist exakt; Dies ist ein Modell, das aus öffentlichen Daten erstellt wurde. Der Unterschied besteht darin, dass Sie sehen können, wie es gebaut wurde, und jeden Schritt überprüfen können. Der Konfidenzgrad oben in der Berechnung zeigt an, wie viel von der Zahl auf offengelegten Zahlen beruht, und auf der Seite wird gekennzeichnet, wo eine Zahl auf einer Annahme beruht.
Is Anthony Mackie rich compared to the average person?
Yes. A net worth of $165.1 Million is far above the median American household, which sits near $193,000 according to Federal Reserve data.
What is Anthony Mackie's biggest source of wealth?
On this page it is film salaries, the largest line in the calculation at $305.7 Million. The full breakdown, with every other line and its source, is above.
How much does Anthony Mackie make from endorsements?
The model counts $16.0 Million in career endorsement income for Anthony: 1 named partnerships x the $4.0M annual fee from the median disclosed film deal x a 4-year term, spread across the deal years. It is an estimate, since the individual deal values are not all public, and it sits as its own line in the calculation above.
Entdecken Sie andere Schauspieler
Über NetWorth Explained
We originally created NWE because nobody in the public-figure net worth space showed their work. Magazines and sites threw out big numbers while hiding behind vague claims of “proprietary algorithms” or “insider knowledge.” That’s why we started the world’s only publication that transparently showed every assumption, every variable, and every calculation. We’re still the only ones who do it this way. Lesen Sie mehr über NetWorth Explained.