$168.3 Million

Chris Pine Nettovermögen 2026

Zuletzt aktualisiert August 3, 2026

As of 2026, Chris Pine has an estimated net worth of $168.3 Million, computed film by film and year by year from public records and published rates. Every input, rate, and source behind the number is on this page.

Calculation

  • Offengelegte Gehälter und dokumentiertes Backend, jeweils mit Zitat
  • Nicht offengelegte Rollen, modelliert aus offengelegten Vergleichswerten für ihre Ära, Budgetspanne und Karrierephase
  • Backend, Vermerke und Produktions-Credits, geschätzt anhand der offengelegten Mediane
Chris Pine

Fast Facts

BirthdateAugust 26, 1980
BirthplaceLos Angeles
BreakthroughStar Trek (2009)
Best KnownStar Trek (2009)

Who Is Chris Pine?

Chris Pine was born August 26, 1980 in Los Angeles, best known for Star Trek (2009). The earnings behind Chris's net worth come from film salaries, backend participation, and endorsement deals.

The model tracks Chris's earning years from 2002 to 2026, with the biggest single year in 2013 at about $42.8 Million of gross income. After representation fees, taxes, and living costs, what stays invested compounds at market returns into an estimated $168.3 Million today.

Data

Jede Zeile unten wurde aus öffentlichen Daten und den veröffentlichten Tariftabellen auf unserer Website berechnet Methodenseite. Vertrauen: Klasse C. Dokumentierte Zahlen decken nur einen kleinen Teil dieser Zahl ab, daher wird der Großteil davon anhand veröffentlichter Zinssätze und Vergleichswerte modelliert (die Noten reichen von A, größtenteils dokumentiert, bis C, größtenteils modelliert).

The Calculation

Chris Pine net worth line items
LineAmount
Revenue
Film pay, modeled lead roles (41 of 68 films)
era and budget-band medians of disclosed lead salaries (winsorized, thin cells shrunk toward the era median), blended with this actor's disclosed quote history when available; soft breakthrough blend near the career break year
$384,692,800
Film pay, modeled post-breakthrough supporting roles (13 of 68 films)
12.0% of lead cells: lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio
$17,484,801
Film pay, modeled supporting and early roles (14 of 68 films)
2,5 % des Ära-Medians: die Prä-Stardom-Rate
$11,940,636
Backend-Punkte, geschätzt
12% of disclosed lead deals included points, at a median 2.6% of box office; expected value on 32 commercially viable undisclosed lead roles; cash spread over 3 years; 18 film(s) used band-specific box-office/budget multiples as a gross proxy
$17,582,329
Empfehlungen, geschätzt (1 Markenpartnerschaften)
1 named partnerships x the $4.0M annual fee from the median disclosed film deal x a 4-year term, spread across the deal years
$16,000,000
Restbestände, geschätzt
SAG residual rates on post-theatrical receipts assumed at half of box office, split by role share and spread over the ten years after each release; 35 film(s) used band-specific box-office proxies
$42,435,318
TV: ER
Levine; guest default per credited year; broadcast network family; priced from tv_episode_rates.csv (en.wikipedia.org)
$30,000
TV: The Guardian
Lonnie Grandy; guest default per credited year; broadcast network family; priced from tv_episode_rates.csv (en.wikipedia.org)
$30,000
TV: CSI: Miami
Tommy Chandler; guest default per credited year; broadcast network family; priced from tv_episode_rates.csv (en.wikipedia.org)
$30,000
TV: American Dreams
Joey Tremain; guest default per credited year; broadcast network family; priced from tv_episode_rates.csv (en.wikipedia.org)
$30,000
TV: Six Feet Under
Young Sam Hoviak; guest default per credited year; cable network family; priced from tv_episode_rates.csv (en.wikipedia.org)
$30,000
TV: Surrender, Dorothy
Shawn Best; one engagement for a television film or special; network not identified, priced on the broadcast cell; priced from tv_episode_rates.csv (en.wikipedia.org)
$75,000
TV: Saturday Night Live
Himself / Host; stated episode count; variety format tier; priced from tv_episode_rates.csv (en.wikipedia.org)
$29,700
TV: Robot Chicken
Capt. Jake / Norman Bates / James T. Kirk; stated episode count; animation format tier; priced from tv_episode_rates.csv (en.wikipedia.org)
$36,120
TV: Wet Hot American Summer: First Day of Camp
Eric; stated episode count; streaming network family; priced from tv_episode_rates.csv (en.wikipedia.org)
$2,000,000
TV: SuperMansion
Dr. Devizo / Robo-Dino; stated episode count; network not identified, priced on the broadcast cell; priced from tv_episode_rates.csv (en.wikipedia.org)
$750,000
TV: Angie Tribeca
Dr. Thomas Hornbein; stated episode count; cable network family; priced from tv_episode_rates.csv (en.wikipedia.org)
$225,000
TV: Breakthrough
Narrator; guest default per credited year; network not identified, priced on the broadcast cell; priced from tv_episode_rates.csv (en.wikipedia.org)
$30,000
TV: Wet Hot American Summer: Ten Years Later
Eric; stated episode count; streaming network family; priced from tv_episode_rates.csv (en.wikipedia.org)
$1,600,000
TV: I Am the Night
Jay Singletary; stated episode count; cable network family; priced from tv_episode_rates.csv (en.wikipedia.org)
$2,100,000
TV: American Dad!
Alistair Covax; guest default per credited year; animation format tier; priced from tv_episode_rates.csv (en.wikipedia.org)
$24,000
TV: Home Movie: The Princess Bride
Westley; guest default per credited year; streaming network family; priced from tv_episode_rates.csv (en.wikipedia.org)
$30,000
Anlagerenditen aus Ersparnissen
mixed portfolio: 55% actual 60/40 securities returns (taxed) + 45% US long-run home-price rate on the rest
$66,344,539
Expenses
Vertretungsgebühren
Agent 10 % + Anwalt 5 %
-$73,424,738
Taxes
Effektive Zinssätze zwischen den USA und Kanada, Jahr für Jahr
-$188,754,022
Persönliche Ausgaben
measured household savings rates by income, times a 88% entertainment-household factor
-$125,328,204
Geschätztes Nettovermögen$168,335,826

Film für Film

Chris Pine film-by-film pay
FilmYearRoleBudgetTheaterkasseBezahlung gezählt
Alpha Gang
no disclosed fee: modeled on the $23.8M shrunk median for 2020s/large (n=2), capped at $10.5M
2026Lead$70,000,000$10,499,881
Carousel
no disclosed fee: modeled on the $23.8M shrunk median for 2020s/large (n=2), capped at $10.5M
2026Lead$70,000,000$3,750,000$10,499,881
TBA
no disclosed fee: modeled on the $23.8M shrunk median for 2020s/large (n=2), capped at $10.5M
2026Lead$70,000,000$10,499,881
The Kidnapping of Arabella
no disclosed fee: modeled on the $23.8M shrunk median for 2020s/large (n=2), capped at $10.5M
2025Lead$70,000,000$86,452$10,499,769
Ariana DeBose
no disclosed fee: modeled on the $23.8M shrunk median for 2020s/large (n=2), capped at $10.5M
2023Lead$70,000,000$10,499,124
Dungeons & Dragons: Honor Among Thieves
no disclosed fee: modeled on the $16.4M shrunk median for 2020s/tentpole (n=5)
2023Lead$150,000,000$208,200,000$16,427,155
Poolman
no disclosed fee: modeled on the $23.8M shrunk median for 2020s/large (n=2), capped at $10.5M
2023Lead$70,000,000$153,325$10,499,124
Wish
no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $16.4M shrunk median for 2020s/tentpole (n=5) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio)
2023Supporting$187,500,000$255,000,000$1,971,291
All the Old Knives
no disclosed fee: modeled on the $23.8M shrunk median for 2020s/large (n=2), capped at $10.5M
2022Lead$70,000,000$10,498,294
Don't Worry Darling
no disclosed fee: modeled on the $21.7M shrunk median for 2020s/mid (n=1), capped at $3.0M
2022Lead$20,000,000$87,609,403$2,999,577
Doula
no disclosed fee: modeled on the $23.8M shrunk median for 2020s/large (n=2), capped at $10.5M
2022Lead$70,000,000$10,498,294
The Contractor
no disclosed fee: modeled on the $23.8M shrunk median for 2020s/large (n=2), capped at $10.5M
2022Lead$70,000,000$2,100,000$10,498,294
Heimfilm: Die Braut des Prinzen
no disclosed fee: modeled on the $23.8M shrunk median for 2020s/large (n=2), capped at $10.5M
2020Lead$70,000,000$10,493,532
Wonder Woman 1984
no disclosed fee: modeled on the $18.0M shrunk median for 2020s/blockbuster (n=8)
2020Lead$200,000,000$169,600,000$17,988,540
American Dad!
no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio)
2019Supporting$40,000,000$1,318,672
I Am the Night
no disclosed fee: modeled on the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3), capped at $6.0M
2019Lead$40,000,000$5,992,723
Love, Antosha
no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio)
2019Supporting$40,000,000$50,168$1,318,672
A Wrinkle in Time
no disclosed fee: modeled on the $20.0M shrunk median for 2010s/tentpole (n=12), capped at $17.2M
2018Lead$115,000,000$133,000,000$17,208,584
Outlaw King
no disclosed fee: modeled on the $20.0M shrunk median for 2010s/tentpole (n=12), capped at $18.0M
2018Lead$120,000,000$17,956,729
Spider-Man: Into the Spider-Verse
no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $20.0M shrunk median for 2010s/large (n=8) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio)
2018Supporting$90,000,000$363,800,000$2,395,302
Angie Tribeca
no disclosed fee: modeled on the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3), capped at $6.0M
2017Lead$40,000,000$5,972,493
Breakthrough
no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio)
2017Supporting$40,000,000$1,314,979
Wet Hot American Summer: Ten Years Later
no disclosed fee: modeled on the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3), capped at $6.0M
2017Lead$40,000,000$5,972,493
Wonder Woman
no disclosed fee: modeled on the $20.0M shrunk median for 2010s/tentpole (n=12)
2017Lead$149,000,000$824,000,000$19,906,307
Encore: Movie Partners Sing Broadway
no disclosed fee: modeled on the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3), capped at $6.0M
2016Lead$40,000,000$5,946,666
For the Love of Spock
no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio)
2016Supporting$40,000,000$1,310,265
Hell or High Water
no disclosed fee: modeled on the $5.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid), capped at $1.8M
2016Lead$12,000,000$37,900,000$1,784,396
Star Trek Beyond
no disclosed fee: modeled on the $20.0M shrunk median for 2010s/tentpole (n=12)
2016Lead$185,000,000$343,471,816$19,818,339
The Finest Hours
no disclosed fee: modeled on the $20.0M shrunk median for 2010s/large (n=8), capped at $11.2M
2016Lead$75,000,000$52,100,000$11,149,853
Figures of Speech
no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio)
2015Supporting$40,000,000$1,301,204
SuperMansion
no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio)
2015Supporting$40,000,000$1,301,204
Wet Hot American Summer: First Day of Camp
no disclosed fee: modeled on the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3), capped at $6.0M
2015Lead$40,000,000$5,897,029
Z for Zachariah
no disclosed fee: modeled on the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3), capped at $6.0M
2015Lead$40,000,000$121,461$5,897,029
Billy Magnussen
no disclosed fee: modeled on the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3), capped at $6.0M
2014Lead$40,000,000$5,802,801
Emily Blunt
no disclosed fee: modeled on the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3), capped at $6.0M
2014Lead$40,000,000$5,802,801
Horrible Bosses 2
no disclosed fee: modeled on the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3), capped at $6.3M
2014Lead$42,000,000$107,700,000$6,092,468
Into the Woods
no disclosed fee: modeled on the $20.0M shrunk median for 2010s/large (n=8), capped at $7.5M
2014Lead$50,000,000$212,900,000$7,258,884
Jack Ryan: Shadow Recruit
no disclosed fee: modeled on the $20.0M shrunk median for 2010s/large (n=8), capped at $9.0M
2014Lead$60,000,000$135,503,748$8,707,216
Stretch
no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $5.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio)
2014Supporting$5,000,000$583,639
Queenie Eye
no disclosed fee: modeled on the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3), capped at $6.0M
2013Lead$40,000,000$5,628,052
Star Trek
no disclosed fee: modeled on the $20.0M shrunk median for 2010s/tentpole (n=12)
2013Lead$187,500,000$467,400,000$18,733,101
Star Trek Into Darkness
no disclosed fee: modeled on the $20.0M shrunk median for 2010s/tentpole (n=12)
2013Lead$190,000,000$467,400,000$18,733,101
Celeste and Jesse Forever
no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $5.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio), capped at 15% of budget
2012Supporting$840,000$3,600,000$125,881
People Like Us
no disclosed fee: modeled on the $5.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid), capped at $2.4M
2012Lead$16,000,000$12,600,000$2,128,813
Rise of the Guardians
no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $20.0M shrunk median for 2010s/tentpole (n=12) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio)
2012Supporting$145,000,000$306,900,000$2,173,514
The Ivy Walls
no disclosed fee: modeled on the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3), capped at $6.0M
2012Lead$40,000,000$5,317,563
This Means War
no disclosed fee: modeled on the $20.0M shrunk median for 2010s/large (n=8), capped at $9.8M
2012Lead$65,000,000$156,500,000$8,647,373
Quantum Quest: A Cassini Space Odyssey
soft-breakthrough supporting blend (w=0.66)
2010Supporting$40,000,000$965,490
The Lieutenant of Inishmore
soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.66): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3), capped at $6.0M vs early terms
2010Lead$40,000,000$4,057,830
Unstoppable
soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.66): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $20.0M shrunk median for 2010s/large (n=8), capped at $13.9M vs early terms
2010Lead$92,500,000$167,800,000$9,337,616
Beyond All Boundaries
soft-breakthrough supporting blend (w=0.50)
2009Supporting$40,000,000$1,404,688
Carriers
soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.50): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $19.4M shrunk median for 2000s/mid (n=2), capped at $6.0M vs early terms
2009Lead$40,000,000$5,800,000$3,242,188
Farragut North
soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.50): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $19.4M shrunk median for 2000s/mid (n=2), capped at $6.0M vs early terms
2009Lead$40,000,000$3,242,188
Star Trek
soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.50): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $11.8M shrunk median for 2000s/tentpole (n=9) vs early terms
2009Lead$150,000,000$385,700,000$6,056,818
Bottle Shock
soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.34): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $18.8M median for its era and nearest band (mid), capped at $0.8M vs early terms
2008Lead$5,000,000$4,600,000$564,162
Fat Pig
soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.21): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $19.4M shrunk median for 2000s/mid (n=2), capped at $6.0M vs early terms
2007Lead$40,000,000$1,634,981
Blind Dating
no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $19.4M shrunk median for 2000s/mid (n=2) (pre-stardom rate); soft-breakthrough weight 0.12
2006Lead$40,000,000$945,718$1,141,854
Just My Luck
no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $19.4M shrunk median for 2000s/mid (n=2) (pre-stardom rate); soft-breakthrough weight 0.12
2006Lead$28,000,000$38,100,000$927,288
Robot Chicken
no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $19.4M shrunk median for 2000s/mid (n=2) (pre-stardom rate)
2006Supporting$40,000,000$703,783
Smokin' Aces
no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $18.8M median for its era and nearest band (mid) (pre-stardom rate); soft-breakthrough weight 0.12
2006Lead$17,000,000$57,300,000$716,841
Surrender, Dorothy
no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $19.4M shrunk median for 2000s/mid (n=2) (pre-stardom rate); soft-breakthrough weight 0.12
2006Lead$40,000,000$1,141,854
The Atheist
no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $19.4M shrunk median for 2000s/mid (n=2) (pre-stardom rate); soft-breakthrough weight 0.12
2006Lead$40,000,000$1,141,854
Six Feet Under
no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $19.4M shrunk median for 2000s/mid (n=2) (pre-stardom rate); soft-breakthrough weight 0.06
2005Lead$40,000,000$842,721
American Dreams
no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $19.4M shrunk median for 2000s/mid (n=2) (pre-stardom rate); soft-breakthrough weight 0.03
2004Lead$40,000,000$674,362
The Princess Diaries 2: Royal Engagement
no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $19.4M shrunk median for 2000s/mid (n=2) (pre-stardom rate); soft-breakthrough weight 0.03
2004Lead$45,000,000$135,300,000$700,196
CSI: Miami
no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $19.4M shrunk median for 2000s/mid (n=2) (pre-stardom rate); soft-breakthrough weight 0.02
2003Lead$40,000,000$583,580
ER
no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $19.4M shrunk median for 2000s/mid (n=2) (pre-stardom rate); soft-breakthrough weight 0.02
2003Lead$40,000,000$583,580
The Guardian
no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $19.4M shrunk median for 2000s/mid (n=2) (pre-stardom rate); soft-breakthrough weight 0.02
2003Lead$40,000,000$583,580

So funktionieren die modellierten Figuren. An undisclosed lead role after the breakthrough gets the median of disclosed lead salaries for its era and budget band, capped at 15% of the film’s budget. Supporting and pre-breakthrough roles get 2.5% of that median, the documented going rate for actors before stardom. Films with no reported budget are treated as small productions. Undocumented backend, endorsements, and producer or director credits enter as separate estimated lines in the calculation above, built from disclosed medians. Every median comes from the published tables on our Methodenseite.

Nettovermögen Over Time

$50M$100M$150M200220072012201720222026$168.3 Million2002: $78,4952003: $461,9052004: $784,7932005: $1,378,3702006: $2,534,3702007: $3,030,2052008: $3,856,4962009: $8,360,9742010: $12,309,0602011: $15,205,5492012: $23,004,8722013: $33,775,2672014: $42,255,5082015: $48,901,0082016: $59,756,9782017: $72,400,7962018: $79,859,6322019: $92,788,6552020: $104,574,3172021: $116,157,0772022: $116,462,8262023: $133,401,6242024: $145,384,6502025: $159,997,3042026: $168,335,826

Modellierter Saldo am Ende jedes Jahres, entsprechend der unten aufgeführten Jahrestabelle.

Von Jahr zu Jahr

Chris Pine year by year model
YearIncomeVertretungsgebührenSteuersatzSpentSavedBalance
2026$24,300,460$3,645,06945%$6,261,888$5,098,577$168,335,826
2025$19,172,651$2,875,89845%$4,940,524$4,022,691$159,997,304
2024$6,271,104$940,66645%$1,615,976$1,315,765$145,384,650
2023$31,046,717$4,657,00845%$8,000,304$6,514,036$133,401,624
2022$39,178,084$5,876,71345%$10,095,644$8,220,111$116,462,826
2021$13,239,155$1,985,87345%$3,411,545$2,777,760$116,157,077
2020$23,311,570$3,496,73645%$6,007,065$4,891,094$104,574,317
2019$21,118,321$3,167,74845%$5,441,896$4,430,919$92,788,655
2018$33,534,541$5,030,18145%$8,641,382$7,036,016$79,859,632
2017$40,040,204$6,006,03147%$9,942,607$8,095,505$72,400,796
2016$41,122,805$6,168,42147%$10,211,434$8,314,390$59,756,978
2015$27,791,500$4,168,72547%$6,901,063$5,619,008$48,901,008
2014$31,742,919$4,761,43847%$7,882,262$6,417,923$42,255,508
2013$42,805,038$6,420,75647%$10,629,159$8,654,511$33,775,267
2012$31,198,416$4,679,76243%$8,331,737$6,783,896$23,004,872
2011$11,146,897$1,672,03543%$2,976,850$2,423,821$15,205,549
2010$15,530,365$2,329,55543%$4,147,483$3,376,978$12,309,060
2009$19,021,311$2,853,19743%$5,079,763$4,136,062$8,360,974
2008$5,058,408$758,76143%$1,350,880$1,099,918$3,856,496
2007$1,751,957$262,79443%$467,871$380,952$3,030,205
2006$4,894,837$734,22643%$1,307,198$1,064,351$2,534,370
2005$2,598,349$389,75243%$693,906$564,994$1,378,370
2004$1,369,533$205,43043%$365,742$297,796$784,793
2003$1,727,886$259,18343%$461,443$375,718$461,905
2002$525,222$78,78346%$162,582$78,495$78,495

Model Notes

  • WOHNSITZ-PROXY: Wohnsitz wurde für diese Charge nicht einzeln angegeben; Bis zur Dokumentation wird der US-CA-Standard angewendet
  • salary comps: 2 disclosed lead fee(s) flagged as non-market outliers (scale / far-below-quote) and excluded from era medians
  • Bildnachweis: Wikimedia Commons via Wikipedia (Chris Pine)
Reproduzieren Sie diese Nummer. Eine Vermögensschätzung sollte wie ein wissenschaftlicher Befund reproduzierbar sein: Die gleichen öffentlichen Eingaben und die gleichen veröffentlichten Sätze sollten immer die gleiche Antwort liefern. Filmbudgets und Kinokassen sind öffentliche Berichterstattung. Alle offengelegten Gehälter, Gebührensätze, Steuersätze, Sparquoten und Benchmark-Renditen werden mit Quellenangabe auf unserer Website veröffentlicht Methodenseite. Undisclosed lead roles use the median of disclosed salaries for their era and budget band, capped at 15% of the film’s budget. Supporting and early-career roles use the documented pre-stardom fraction of that median. Undocumented backend, endorsements, and hyphenate credits enter as estimated lines from disclosed medians. Apply the rates year by year as shown above and you will land on $168.3 Million.

Methodik

We rebuild Chris’s career as a yearly time series. Disclosed salaries and documented backend enter as reported, with citations. Undisclosed lead roles get the median of disclosed salaries for their era and budget band, capped at 15% of the film’s budget. Supporting roles and roles from before the breakthrough get 2.5% of that median, the going-rate ratio measured from disclosed pre-stardom deals. Films with no reported budget are treated as small productions, and every role is estimated unless a source documents it was unpaid. Representation fees come out at sourced rates, taxes follow the eras actually lived through, spending follows measured household savings behavior unless court documents say otherwise, and what remains compounds at real market returns. Undocumented backend enters as an expected value from disclosed deals, endorsements at the median disclosed ambassador fee, and producer or director credits at union-scale floors.

Das vollständige Modell, alle Tariftabellen und wie unsere Schätzungen mit echten Angeboten verglichen wurden, finden Sie hier Methodenseite.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Chris Pine's net worth in 2026?

As of 2026, Chris Pine's net worth is an estimated $168.3 Million. The estimate is built film by film from disclosed salaries and documented backend, then year by year: income, minus representation fees and taxes, minus spending, compounded at real market returns.

How does Chris Pine make money?

Filmgehälter und dokumentierte Backend-Beteiligung.

How is Chris Pine's net worth calculated?

Disclosed paydays enter as reported, with citations. Undisclosed lead roles use the median of disclosed salaries for their era and budget band, capped at 15% of the film's budget, and supporting or early-career roles use the documented pre-stardom fraction of that median. We subtract sourced representation fees, taxes for the years Chris actually worked, and spending from measured savings behavior, then compound at real market returns. Undocumented backend, endorsements, and producing credits enter as estimated lines from disclosed medians. Every rate and source is published.

How much does Chris Pine make per film?

Es variiert je nach Rolle und Epoche, und in der Film-für-Film-Tabelle oben sind die für jeden Titel gezählten Gehälter aufgeführt. Offengelegte Zahltage werden wie gemeldet erfasst. Ungenannte Rollen basieren auf dem, was vergleichbare Schauspieler in der gleichen Zeit und mit demselben Budget verdienten, wobei Hauptrollen nach dem Durchbruch am meisten verdienten und Neben- oder Frührollen einen dokumentierten Bruchteil davon verdienten.

Warum ist der Steuersatz so hoch und vermeiden Schauspieler ihn nicht bei einer Darlehensgesellschaft?

Tax comes out at the effective rate for where Chris lived each year, which is the rate shown in the year-by-year table. In a high-tax state like California, combined federal and state income tax reaches close to half of a top earner's income, so those years run in the mid-40s percent. A loan-out company, the corporation many actors run their income through, does not lower the tax on the money they take home. Its real advantage is deducting business costs such as agent, manager, and attorney fees, and the model already subtracts those as a separate line before any tax is applied. High-earning performers also fall outside the pass-through business deduction that other company owners can claim, so it buys them no rate cut.

Warum unterscheidet sich diese Zahl von anderen vermögenden Websites?

Most sites publish a single number with no way to check it. This estimate is built in the open: every salary, rate, and assumption is on the page, and the Methodenseite lists every source.

Wie genau ist diese Schätzung?

Keine Schätzung des Nettovermögens einer Privatperson ist exakt; Dies ist ein Modell, das aus öffentlichen Daten erstellt wurde. Der Unterschied besteht darin, dass Sie sehen können, wie es gebaut wurde, und jeden Schritt überprüfen können. Der Konfidenzgrad oben in der Berechnung zeigt an, wie viel von der Zahl auf offengelegten Zahlen beruht, und auf der Seite wird gekennzeichnet, wo eine Zahl auf einer Annahme beruht.

Is Chris Pine rich compared to the average person?

Yes. A net worth of $168.3 Million is far above the median American household, which sits near $193,000 according to Federal Reserve data.

What is Chris Pine's biggest source of wealth?

On this page it is film salaries, the largest line in the calculation at $384.7 Million. The full breakdown, with every other line and its source, is above.

How much does Chris Pine make from endorsements?

The model counts $16.0 Million in career endorsement income for Chris: 1 named partnerships x the $4.0M annual fee from the median disclosed film deal x a 4-year term, spread across the deal years. It is an estimate, since the individual deal values are not all public, and it sits as its own line in the calculation above.

Entdecken Sie andere Schauspieler

Über NetWorth Explained

We originally created NWE because nobody in the public-figure net worth space showed their work. Magazines and sites threw out big numbers while hiding behind vague claims of “proprietary algorithms” or “insider knowledge.” That’s why we started the world’s only publication that transparently showed every assumption, every variable, and every calculation. We’re still the only ones who do it this way. Lesen Sie mehr über NetWorth Explained.