Jennifer Garner Patrimonio neto 2026
Actualizado August 3, 2026
As of 2026, Jennifer Garner has an estimated net worth of $135.9 Million, computed film by film and year by year from public records and published rates. Every input, rate, and source behind the number is on this page.
Calculation
- Salarios divulgados y backend documentado, cada uno con una cita.
- Roles no revelados modelados a partir de comparables revelados para su época, rango de presupuesto y etapa profesional.
- Backend, patrocinios y créditos de producción estimados a partir de medianas divulgadas
Fast Facts
| Birthdate | April 17, 1972 |
|---|---|
| Birthplace | Houston |
| Breakthrough | Alias (2001) |
| Best Known | 13 Going on 30 (2004) |
Who Is Jennifer Garner?
Jennifer Garner was born April 17, 1972 in Houston, best known for 13 Going on 30 (2004). The earnings behind Jennifer's net worth come from film salaries, backend participation, producing and directing fees, endorsement deals, and the Once Upon a Farm stake.
The model tracks Jennifer's earning years from 1996 to 2026, with the biggest single year in 2007 at about $17.9 Million of gross income. After representation fees, taxes, and living costs, what stays invested compounds at market returns into an estimated $135.9 Million today.
Data
Cada línea a continuación se calcula a partir de datos públicos y las tablas de tarifas publicadas en nuestro página de metodología. Confianza: Grado C. Las cifras documentadas cubren sólo una pequeña parte de esta cifra, por lo que la mayor parte está modelada a partir de tasas publicadas y comparables (las calificaciones van desde A, en su mayoría documentada, hasta C, en su mayoría modelada).
The Calculation
| Line | Amount |
|---|---|
| Revenue | |
| Film pay, modeled lead roles (21 of 35 films) era and budget-band medians of disclosed lead salaries (winsorized, thin cells shrunk toward the era median), blended with this actor's disclosed quote history when available; soft breakthrough blend near the career break year | $79,249,653 |
| Film pay, modeled post-breakthrough supporting roles (7 of 35 films) 12.0% of lead cells: lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio | $10,302,326 |
| Film pay, modeled supporting and early roles (7 of 35 films) 2,5% de las medianas de la época: la tasa previa al estrellato | $7,438,700 |
| Puntos backend, estimados 12% of disclosed lead deals included points, at a median 2.6% of box office; expected value on 14 commercially viable undisclosed lead roles; cash spread over 3 years; documented-but-unquantified points use the median rate directly; 1 film(s) used band-specific box-office/budget multiples as a gross proxy | $8,955,294 |
| Respaldos, estimados (2 asociaciones de marca) 2 named partnerships x the $4.0M annual fee from the median disclosed film deal x a 4-year term, spread across the deal years | $32,000,000 |
| Producer, director, and writer credits, estimated (3 credits) union-scale floor per credit, scaled to each era; post-breakthrough lead packages use a multiple of that floor; actual packages often run higher | $3,216,096 |
| Residuos, estimados SAG residual rates on post-theatrical receipts assumed at half of box office, split by role share and spread over the ten years after each release; 3 film(s) used band-specific box-office proxies | $9,931,822 |
| Alias salary (2001-2005) Variety covered her mid-run raise; the series is booked from a reported $45K per episode early to $150K by the final season, interpolated between the documented endpoints (variedad.com) | $10,800,000 |
| Rentabilidad de la inversión sobre los ahorros mixed portfolio: 55% actual 60/40 securities returns (taxed) + 45% US long-run home-price rate on the rest | $43,567,455 |
| Brentwood Park home appreciation, estimated documented $7,900,000 purchase in 2019, 6.0%/yr US-CA appreciation, net 7% selling costs; the purchase itself is already counted in savings | $3,147,172 |
| First Brentwood marital home appreciation, estimated documented $5,500,000 purchase in 2004, sold 2025 for a documented $10,800,000, actual sale price, net 7% selling costs; the purchase itself is already counted in savings (hellomagazine.com) | $4,544,000 |
| Once Upon a Farm stake equity, estimated co-founded 2017 with a documented 7% stake; the February 2026 IPO priced the company at $724M and Forbes valued her stake at $64M on the first trading day; $724,000,000 x 7% stake (forbes.com) | $50,680,000 |
| Expenses | |
| Honorarios de representación agente 10% + abogado 5% | -$24,118,160 |
| Taxes Tasas efectivas entre EE. UU. y CA, año tras año | -$60,309,267 |
| Gastos personales measured household savings rates by income, times a 88% entertainment-household factor | -$42,439,741 |
| Patrimonio neto estimado | $135,859,189 |
Película por película
| Film | Year | Role | Budget | Taquillas | Pago contado |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Family Switch no disclosed fee: modeled on the $23.8M shrunk median for 2020s/large (n=2), capped at $10.5M | 2023 | Plomo + P | $70,000,000 | – | $10,499,969 |
| The Adam Project no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $16.4M shrunk median for 2020s/tentpole (n=5) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio) | 2022 | Supporting | $116,000,000 | – | $1,971,419 |
| Yes Day no disclosed fee: modeled on the $25.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid), capped at $0.9M | 2021 | Plomo + P | $6,000,000 | $2,000,000 | $899,997 |
| Wonder Park no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $20.0M shrunk median for 2010s/tentpole (n=12) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio) | 2019 | Supporting | $100,000,000 | $119,600,000 | $2,399,914 |
| Love, Simon no disclosed fee: modeled on the $5.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid), capped at $2.5M | 2018 | Lead | $17,000,000 | $66,300,000 | $2,549,786 |
| Peppermint no disclosed fee: modeled on the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3), capped at $3.8M | 2018 | Lead | $25,000,000 | $53,900,000 | $3,749,693 |
| A Happening of Monumental Proportions no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $5.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio) | 2017 | Supporting | $6,000,000 | $850,000 | $599,918 |
| The Tribes of Palos Verdes no disclosed fee: modeled on the $5.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid), capped at $0.8M | 2017 | Lead | $5,000,000 | $11,603 | $749,892 |
| Miracles from Heaven no disclosed fee: modeled on the $5.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid), capped at $2.1M | 2016 | Lead | $14,000,000 | $74,000,000 | $2,099,338 |
| Mother's Day no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio) | 2016 | Supporting | $25,000,000 | $48,800,000 | $1,319,650 |
| Nine Lives no disclosed fee: modeled on the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3), capped at $4.5M | 2016 | Lead | $30,000,000 | $57,800,000 | $4,498,583 |
| Wakefield no disclosed fee: modeled on the $5.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid), capped at $0.6M | 2016 | Lead | $4,000,000 | $874,187 | $599,841 |
| Danny Collins no disclosed fee: modeled on the $5.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid), capped at $1.5M | 2015 | Lead | $10,000,000 | $10,800,000 | $1,499,102 |
| Alexander and the Terrible, Horrible, No Good, Very Bad Day no disclosed fee: modeled on the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3), capped at $4.2M | 2014 | Lead | $28,000,000 | $100,600,000 | $4,195,011 |
| Draft Day no disclosed fee: modeled on the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3), capped at $3.8M | 2014 | Lead | $25,000,000 | $29,500,000 | $3,745,583 |
| Men, Women & Children no disclosed fee: modeled on the $5.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid), capped at $2.4M | 2014 | Lead | $16,000,000 | $2,200,000 | $2,397,108 |
| Dallas Buyers Club no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $5.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio) | 2013 | Supporting | $5,000,000 | $55,700,000 | $598,826 |
| The Odd Life of Timothy Green no disclosed fee: modeled on the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3), capped at $3.8M | 2012 | Lead | $25,000,000 | $56,000,000 | $3,733,303 |
| Arthur no disclosed fee: modeled on the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3), capped at $6.0M | 2011 | Lead | $40,000,000 | $48,100,000 | $5,946,666 |
| Butter no disclosed fee: modeled on the $5.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid), capped at $1.6M | 2011 | Plomo + P | $10,800,000 | $175,706 | $1,606,073 |
| Valentine's Day no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $20.0M shrunk median for 2010s/large (n=8) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio) | 2010 | Supporting | $52,000,000 | $216,500,000 | $2,365,826 |
| Ghosts of Girlfriends Past no disclosed fee: modeled on the $19.4M shrunk median for 2000s/mid (n=2), capped at $5.6M | 2009 | Lead | $37,500,000 | $102,400,000 | $5,447,930 |
| The Invention of Lying no disclosed fee: modeled on the $18.8M median for its era and nearest band (mid), capped at $2.8M | 2009 | Lead | $18,500,000 | $32,700,000 | $2,695,561 |
| Juno no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $18.8M median for its era and nearest band (mid) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio), capped at 15% of budget | 2007 | Supporting | $7,500,000 | $231,400,000 | $1,046,773 |
| The Kingdom no disclosed fee: modeled on the $20.0M shrunk median for 2000s/large (n=18), capped at $10.9M | 2007 | Lead | $72,500,000 | $87,000,000 | $9,638,270 |
| Catch and Release soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.79): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $19.4M shrunk median for 2000s/mid (n=2), capped at $3.8M vs early terms | 2006 | Lead | $25,000,000 | $16,000,000 | $3,068,763 |
| Elektra soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.66): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $20.0M shrunk median for 2000s/large (n=18), capped at $9.8M vs early terms | 2005 | Lead | $65,000,000 | $57,000,000 | $6,611,996 |
| 13 Going on 30 soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.50): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $19.4M shrunk median for 2000s/mid (n=2), capped at $5.5M vs early terms | 2004 | Lead | $37,000,000 | $96,500,000 | $3,017,188 |
| Daredevil soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.34): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $20.0M shrunk median for 2000s/large (n=18), capped at $11.7M vs early terms | 2003 | Lead | $78,000,000 | $179,200,000 | $4,299,529 |
| Pearl Harbor no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $11.8M shrunk median for 2000s/tentpole (n=9) (pre-stardom rate) | 2001 | Supporting | $140,000,000 | $449,200,000 | $429,287 |
| Stealing Time no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $19.4M shrunk median for 2000s/mid (n=2) (pre-stardom rate); soft-breakthrough weight 0.12 | 2001 | Lead | $40,000,000 | – | $1,141,854 |
| Dude, Where's My Car? no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $18.8M median for its era and nearest band (mid) (pre-stardom rate) | 2000 | Supporting | $13,000,000 | $73,200,000 | $564,986 |
| Deconstructing Harry no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $14.4M shrunk median for 1990s/mid (n=6) (pre-stardom rate) | 1997 | Supporting | $20,000,000 | $10,600,000 | $372,097 |
| Mr. Magoo no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $14.4M shrunk median for 1990s/mid (n=6) (pre-stardom rate) | 1997 | Supporting | $30,000,000 | $28,900,000 | $372,097 |
| Washington Square no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $10.0M shrunk median for 1990s/small (n=1) (pre-stardom rate) | 1997 | Supporting | $15,000,000 | $1,900,000 | $258,850 |
Cómo funcionan las figuras modeladas. An undisclosed lead role after the breakthrough gets the median of disclosed lead salaries for its era and budget band, capped at 15% of the film’s budget. Supporting and pre-breakthrough roles get 2.5% of that median, the documented going rate for actors before stardom. Films with no reported budget are treated as small productions. Undocumented backend, endorsements, and producer or director credits enter as separate estimated lines in the calculation above, built from disclosed medians. Every median comes from the published tables on our página de metodología.
Patrimonio neto Over Time
Saldo modelado al final de cada año, que coincide con la tabla año por año a continuación.
Año tras año
| Year | Income | Honorarios de representante | Tasa impositiva | Spent | Saved | Balance |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | $311,972 | $46,796 | 45% | $131,729 | $14,118 | $135,859,189 |
| 2025 | $470,405 | $70,561 | 45% | $173,468 | $46,446 | $75,936,192 |
| 2024 | $548,991 | $82,349 | 45% | $202,448 | $54,205 | $70,737,179 |
| 2023 | $8,890,581 | $1,333,587 | 45% | $2,290,978 | $1,865,368 | $65,449,410 |
| 2022 | $4,832,044 | $724,807 | 45% | $1,245,150 | $1,013,831 | $58,360,138 |
| 2021 | $2,623,004 | $393,451 | 45% | $675,911 | $550,343 | $61,539,287 |
| 2020 | $753,448 | $113,017 | 45% | $237,549 | $114,688 | $56,252,563 |
| 2019 | $2,226,416 | $333,962 | 45% | $573,716 | $467,133 | $52,255,111 |
| 2018 | $5,739,255 | $860,888 | 45% | $1,478,926 | $1,204,176 | $46,807,094 |
| 2017 | $3,417,529 | $512,629 | 47% | $848,626 | $690,971 | $45,338,143 |
| 2016 | $7,006,451 | $1,050,968 | 47% | $1,739,811 | $1,416,595 | $41,489,278 |
| 2015 | $4,136,789 | $620,518 | 47% | $1,027,229 | $836,394 | $38,092,845 |
| 2014 | $8,243,201 | $1,236,480 | 47% | $2,046,915 | $1,666,647 | $36,372,863 |
| 2013 | $4,092,268 | $613,840 | 47% | $1,016,174 | $827,393 | $32,709,005 |
| 2012 | $3,331,476 | $499,721 | 43% | $889,692 | $724,408 | $29,196,271 |
| 2011 | $8,175,735 | $1,226,360 | 43% | $2,183,382 | $1,777,761 | $26,689,535 |
| 2010 | $4,548,949 | $682,342 | 43% | $1,214,826 | $989,140 | $23,990,537 |
| 2009 | $9,046,165 | $1,356,925 | 43% | $2,415,836 | $1,967,031 | $21,530,715 |
| 2008 | $4,941,083 | $741,162 | 43% | $1,319,548 | $1,074,407 | $17,857,715 |
| 2007 | $17,898,527 | $2,684,779 | 43% | $4,779,916 | $3,891,920 | $18,449,278 |
| 2006 | $13,772,494 | $2,065,874 | 43% | $3,678,033 | $2,994,741 | $13,926,088 |
| 2005 | $17,234,015 | $2,585,102 | 43% | $4,602,454 | $3,747,426 | $10,249,824 |
| 2004 | $15,323,298 | $2,298,495 | 43% | $4,092,185 | $3,331,953 | $6,273,902 |
| 2003 | $6,237,522 | $935,628 | 43% | $1,665,770 | $1,356,309 | $2,790,369 |
| 2002 | $2,812,555 | $421,883 | 46% | $711,579 | $579,384 | $1,306,058 |
| 2001 | $2,116,301 | $317,445 | 46% | $535,426 | $435,956 | $749,249 |
| 2000 | $872,794 | $130,919 | 46% | $270,173 | $130,439 | $313,427 |
| 1999 | $175,457 | $26,319 | 46% | $63,526 | $17,009 | $180,142 |
| 1998 | $5,962 | $894 | 46% | $2,471 | $265 | $152,321 |
| 1997 | $702,131 | $105,320 | 46% | $217,344 | $104,934 | $137,569 |
| 1996 | $300,913 | $45,137 | 46% | $108,948 | $29,171 | $29,171 |
Model Notes
- salary comps: 2 disclosed lead fee(s) flagged as non-market outliers (scale / far-below-quote) and excluded from era medians
Metodología
We rebuild Jennifer’s career as a yearly time series. Disclosed salaries and documented backend enter as reported, with citations. Undisclosed lead roles get the median of disclosed salaries for their era and budget band, capped at 15% of the film’s budget. Supporting roles and roles from before the breakthrough get 2.5% of that median, the going-rate ratio measured from disclosed pre-stardom deals. Films with no reported budget are treated as small productions, and every role is estimated unless a source documents it was unpaid. Representation fees come out at sourced rates, taxes follow the eras actually lived through, spending follows measured household savings behavior unless court documents say otherwise, and what remains compounds at real market returns. Undocumented backend enters as an expected value from disclosed deals, endorsements at the median disclosed ambassador fee, and producer or director credits at union-scale floors.
El modelo completo, cada tabla de tarifas y cómo nuestras estimaciones se han comparado con ofertas reales están en el sitio. página de metodología.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is Jennifer Garner's net worth in 2026?
As of 2026, Jennifer Garner's net worth is an estimated $135.9 Million. The estimate is built film by film from disclosed salaries and documented backend, then year by year: income, minus representation fees and taxes, minus spending, compounded at real market returns.
How does Jennifer Garner make money?
Alias salaries built from Variety-covered raise reporting, plus film leads modeled from their budgets. Her Capital One campaign enters as an estimated endorsement line and her documented Juno points at the median disclosed backend rate; the Once Upon a Farm stake stays queued.
How is Jennifer Garner's net worth calculated?
Los días de pago divulgados ingresan según lo informado, con citaciones. Los papeles principales no revelados utilizan la mediana de los salarios revelados para su época y banda presupuestaria, con un límite del 15% del presupuesto de la película, y los papeles secundarios o de inicio de carrera utilizan la fracción documentada previa al estrellato de esa mediana. Restamos los honorarios de representación, los impuestos de los años en los que Jennifer realmente trabajó y el gasto del comportamiento de ahorro medido, y luego componemos los rendimientos reales del mercado. Backend indocumentados, respaldos y créditos de producción ingresan como líneas estimadas a partir de las medianas divulgadas. Se publican todas las tarifas y fuentes.
How much does Jennifer Garner make per film?
Varía según el papel y la época, y la tabla película por película anterior enumera el pago contado para cada título. Los días de pago divulgados ingresan según lo informado. Los papeles no revelados se modelan a partir de lo que ganaron actores comparables en la misma época y rango de presupuesto, siendo los papeles principales después del gran avance los que ganan más y los papeles secundarios o iniciales una fracción documentada de eso.
¿Por qué el tipo impositivo es tan alto y los actores no lo evitan con una empresa de préstamo?
El impuesto se aplica a la tasa efectiva del lugar donde vivió Jennifer cada año, que es la tasa que se muestra en la tabla año por año. En un estado con impuestos altos como California, el impuesto sobre la renta federal y estatal combinado alcanza cerca de la mitad de los ingresos de una persona con mayores ingresos, por lo que esos años rondan el 40 por ciento. Una empresa de préstamos, la corporación a través de la cual muchos actores administran sus ingresos, no reduce el impuesto sobre el dinero que se llevan a casa. Su verdadera ventaja es deducir los costos comerciales, como los honorarios de agentes, gerentes y abogados, y el modelo ya los resta como una línea separada antes de aplicar cualquier impuesto. Las empresas con altos ingresos también quedan fuera de la deducción empresarial de transferencia que otros propietarios de empresas pueden reclamar, por lo que no les permite obtener ningún recorte de tasas.
¿Por qué esta cifra es diferente a la de otros sitios de patrimonio neto?
Most sites publish a single number with no way to check it. This estimate is built in the open: every salary, rate, and assumption is on the page, and the página de metodología lists every source.
¿Qué tan precisa es esta estimación?
Ninguna estimación del patrimonio neto de un particular es exacta; éste es un modelo construido a partir de datos públicos. La diferencia es que puedes ver cómo se construyó y comprobar cada paso. El grado de confianza cerca de la parte superior del cálculo muestra qué parte de la cifra se basa en números revelados, y la página indica dónde se apoya un número en una suposición.
Is Jennifer Garner rich compared to the average person?
Yes. A net worth of $135.9 Million is far above the median American household, which sits near $193,000 according to Federal Reserve data.
What is Jennifer Garner's biggest source of wealth?
On this page it is film salaries, the largest line in the calculation at $79.2 Million. The full breakdown, with every other line and its source, is above.
How much does Jennifer Garner make from endorsements?
The model counts $32.0 Million in career endorsement income for Jennifer: 2 named partnerships x the $4.0M annual fee from the median disclosed film deal x a 4-year term, spread across the deal years. It is an estimate, since the individual deal values are not all public, and it sits as its own line in the calculation above.
What businesses does Jennifer Garner own?
The stake counted on this page is Once Upon a Farm stake. It is valued from a reported transaction or a revenue multiple, and shown as its own line in the calculation above with the basis next to it.
Explora otros actores
Acerca de NetWorth Explained
We originally created NWE because nobody in the public-figure net worth space showed their work. Magazines and sites threw out big numbers while hiding behind vague claims of “proprietary algorithms” o “insider knowledge.” That’s why we started the world’s only publication that transparently showed every assumption, every variable, and every calculation. We’re still the only ones who do it this way. Leer más sobre NetWorth Explained.