$66.8 Million

Natalie Portman Patrimonio neto 2026

Actualizado August 3, 2026

As of 2026, Natalie Portman has an estimated net worth of $66.8 Million, computed film by film and year by year from public records and published rates. Every input, rate, and source behind the number is on this page.

Calculation

  • Salarios divulgados y backend documentado, cada uno con una cita.
  • Roles no revelados modelados a partir de comparables revelados para su época, rango de presupuesto y etapa profesional.
  • Backend, patrocinios y créditos de producción estimados a partir de medianas divulgadas
Natalie Portman

Fast Facts

BirthdateJune 9, 1981
BirthplaceHadassah University Hospital, Mt. Scopus
BreakthroughLéon: The Professional (1994)
Best KnownBlack Swan (2010)

Who Is Natalie Portman?

Natalie Portman was born June 9, 1981 in Hadassah University Hospital, Mt. Scopus, best known for Black Swan (2010). The earnings behind Natalie's net worth come from film salaries, backend participation, producing and directing fees, endorsement deals, and the Angel City FC founding stake.

The model tracks Natalie's earning years from 1994 to 2026, with the biggest single year in 2011 at about $23.8 Million of gross income. After representation fees, taxes, and living costs, what stays invested compounds at market returns into an estimated $66.8 Million today.

Data

Cada línea a continuación se calcula a partir de datos públicos y las tablas de tarifas publicadas en nuestro página de metodología. Confianza: Grado C. Las cifras documentadas cubren sólo una pequeña parte de esta cifra, por lo que la mayor parte está modelada a partir de tasas publicadas y comparables (las calificaciones van desde A, en su mayoría documentada, hasta C, en su mayoría modelada).

The Calculation

Natalie Portman net worth line items
LineAmount
Revenue
Film pay with a disclosed figure (1 of 40 films)
Salarios por película y backend de los informes citados.
$1,200,000
Film pay, modeled lead roles (16 of 40 films)
era and budget-band medians of disclosed lead salaries (winsorized, thin cells shrunk toward the era median), blended with this actor's disclosed quote history when available; soft breakthrough blend near the career break year
$69,160,169
Film pay, modeled post-breakthrough supporting roles (1 of 40 films)
12.0% of lead cells: lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio
$583,639
Film pay, modeled supporting and early roles (22 of 40 films)
2,5% de las medianas de la época: la tasa previa al estrellato
$15,302,474
Puntos backend, estimados
12% of disclosed lead deals included points, at a median 2.6% of box office; expected value on 4 commercially viable undisclosed lead roles; cash spread over 3 years; documented-but-unquantified points use the median rate directly
$12,462,897
Respaldos, estimados (1 asociación de marca)
1 named partnerships x the $4.0M annual fee from the median disclosed film deal x a 4-year term, spread across the deal years
$16,000,000
Producer, director, and writer credits, estimated (8 credits)
union-scale floor per credit, scaled to each era; post-breakthrough lead packages use a multiple of that floor; actual packages often run higher
$6,968,208
Residuos, estimados
SAG residual rates on post-theatrical receipts assumed at half of box office, split by role share and spread over the ten years after each release; 1 film(s) used band-specific box-office proxies
$15,657,221
Rentabilidad de la inversión sobre los ahorros
mixed portfolio: 55% actual 60/40 securities returns (taxed) + 45% US long-run home-price rate on the rest
$29,738,025
Los Feliz home (Laughlin Park) appreciation, estimated
documented $3,250,000 purchase in 2009 (reported between $3.25M and $3.7M; lower figure used), 6.0%/yr US-CA appreciation, net 7% selling costs; the purchase itself is already counted in savings
$4,888,906
Montecito estate appreciation, estimated
documented $6,500,000 purchase in 2017, sold 2021 for a documented $8,000,000, actual sale price, net 7% selling costs; the purchase itself is already counted in savings (amlu.com)
$940,000
Paris mansion, 7th arrondissement appreciation, estimated
documented $16,500,000 purchase in 2023 (reported EUR 15.2M by Challenges via secondary coverage, converted), 4.0%/yr France appreciation, net 7% selling costs; the purchase itself is already counted in savings (graziamagazine.com)
$761,038
Angel City FC founding stake equity, estimated
the 2024 controlling-stake purchase valued the club at $250M; her exact founding stake was never disclosed, so a 1% non-operating co-founder share is assumed: $250,000,000 x 1% stake; 25% marketability discount applied (sportico.com)
$1,875,000
Expenses
Honorarios de representación
agente 10% + abogado 5%
-$20,490,853
Taxes
US-CA then France then US-CA then France effective rates, year by year
-$51,507,746
Gastos personales
measured household savings rates by income, times a 88% entertainment-household factor
-$36,018,199
Patrimonio neto estimado$66,791,855

Película por película

Natalie Portman film-by-film pay
FilmYearRoleBudgetTaquillasPago contado
May December
no disclosed fee: modeled on the $21.7M shrunk median for 2020s/mid (n=1), capped at $3.0M
2023Plomo + P$20,000,000$3,400,000$2,999,577
Thor: amor y trueno
disclosed: she revealed a $1.2M fee, far below her co-star's
2022Supporting$250,000,000$760,900,000$1,200,000
Lucy in the Sky
no disclosed fee: modeled on the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3), capped at $3.2M
2019Lead$21,400,000$325,950$3,202,743
Annihilation
no disclosed fee: modeled on the $20.0M shrunk median for 2010s/large (n=8), capped at $8.2M
2018Lead$55,000,000$43,100,000$8,212,763
The Death & Life of John F. Donovan
no disclosed fee: modeled on the $5.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid), capped at $1.4M
2018Lead$9,000,000$3,300,000$1,344,114
Vox Lux
no disclosed fee: modeled on the $5.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid), capped at $1.6M
2018Plomo + EP$11,000,000$1,400,000$1,642,673
Jackie
no disclosed fee: modeled on the $5.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid), capped at $1.4M
2016Lead$9,000,000$36,600,000$1,327,967
Planetarium
no disclosed fee: modeled on the $5.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid), capped at $1.8M
2016Lead$12,000,000$530,515$1,769,873
A Tale of Love and Darkness
no disclosed fee: modeled on the $5.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid), capped at $1.8M
2015Plomo + D$12,000,000$572,212$1,742,304
Jane Got a Gun
no disclosed fee: modeled on the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3), capped at $3.8M
2015Plomo + P$25,000,000$3,800,000$3,630,303
Knight of Cups
no disclosed fee: modeled on the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3), capped at $3.0M
2015Lead$20,000,000$1,100,000$2,906,137
The Heyday of the Insensitive Bastards
no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $5.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio)
2015Supporting$15,000,000$583,639
Thor: The Dark World
no disclosed fee: modeled on the $20.0M shrunk median for 2010s/tentpole (n=12)
2013Lead$170,000,000$644,800,000$17,675,543
No Strings Attached
soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.66): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3), capped at $3.8M vs early terms
2011Plomo + EP$25,000,000$149,200,000$2,571,128
Thor
soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.66): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $20.0M shrunk median for 2010s/tentpole (n=12) vs early terms
2011Lead$150,000,000$449,300,000$13,384,749
Your Highness
soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.66): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $20.0M shrunk median for 2010s/large (n=8), capped at $7.5M vs early terms
2011Lead$50,000,000$28,000,000$5,125,295
Black Swan
soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.50): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $5.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid), capped at $1.9M vs early terms
2010Lead$13,000,000$329,400,000$1,037,500
Hesher
soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.50): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $5.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid), capped at $1.1M vs early terms
2010Plomo + P$7,000,000$449,702$587,500
Hermanos
soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.34): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $19.4M shrunk median for 2000s/mid (n=2), capped at $3.9M vs early terms
2009Lead$26,000,000$43,500,000$1,643,104
The Other Woman
soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.34): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $18.8M median for its era and nearest band (mid), capped at $2.2M vs early terms
2009Plomo + EP$15,000,000$1,400,000$1,073,028
New York, I Love You
soft-breakthrough supporting blend (w=0.21)
2008Supporting + D$14,000,000$9,700,000$809,043
The Other Boleyn Girl
soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.21): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $19.4M shrunk median for 2000s/mid (n=2), capped at $5.2M vs early terms
2008Lead$35,000,000$80,700,000$1,478,525
Mr. Magorium's Wonder Emporium
no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $20.0M shrunk median for 2000s/large (n=18) (pre-stardom rate); soft-breakthrough weight 0.12
2007Lead$65,000,000$69,500,000$1,602,627
My Blueberry Nights
no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $18.8M median for its era and nearest band (mid) (pre-stardom rate)
2007Supporting$10,000,000$22,000,000$591,678
The Darjeeling Limited
no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $18.8M median for its era and nearest band (mid) (pre-stardom rate)
2007Supporting$17,500,000$35,000,000$681,080
Goya's Ghosts
no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $20.0M shrunk median for 2000s/large (n=18) (pre-stardom rate); soft-breakthrough weight 0.06
2006Lead$50,000,000$9,448,082$954,784
Paris, je t'aime
no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $18.8M median for its era and nearest band (mid) (pre-stardom rate)
2006Supporting$13,000,000$17,500,000$564,986
The Fountain
no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $19.4M shrunk median for 2000s/mid (n=2) (pre-stardom rate); soft-breakthrough weight 0.06
2006Lead$35,000,000$16,500,000$793,994
Free Zone
no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $18.8M median for its era and nearest band (mid) (pre-stardom rate), capped at 15% of budget; soft-breakthrough weight 0.03
2005Lead$2,500,000$32,381$375,000
V for Vendetta
no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $20.0M shrunk median for 2000s/large (n=18) (pre-stardom rate); soft-breakthrough weight 0.03
2005Lead$54,000,000$132,600,000$761,783
Closer
no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $19.4M shrunk median for 2000s/mid (n=2) (pre-stardom rate); soft-breakthrough weight 0.02
2004Lead$27,000,000$115,500,000$548,507
Garden State
no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $18.8M median for its era and nearest band (mid) (pre-stardom rate), capped at 15% of budget; soft-breakthrough weight 0.02
2004Lead$2,500,000$35,800,000$375,000
Cold Mountain
no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $20.0M shrunk median for 2000s/large (n=18) (pre-stardom rate)
2003Supporting$79,000,000$173,000,000$517,700
Where the Heart Is
no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $18.8M median for its era and nearest band (mid) (pre-stardom rate); soft-breakthrough weight 0.00
2000Lead$15,000,000$40,000,000$471,014
Anywhere but Here
no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $14.4M shrunk median for 1990s/mid (n=6) (pre-stardom rate); soft-breakthrough weight 0.00
1999Lead$23,000,000$23,600,000$361,393
Beautiful Girls
no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $14.4M shrunk median for 1990s/mid (n=6) (pre-stardom rate)
1996Supporting$26,000,000$10,600,000$359,496
Everyone Says I Love You
no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $14.4M shrunk median for 1990s/mid (n=6) (pre-stardom rate)
1996Supporting$20,000,000$9,800,000$359,496
Mars Attacks!
no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $14.6M shrunk median for 1990s/large (n=3) (pre-stardom rate)
1996Supporting$70,000,000$101,400,000$365,123
Heat
no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $14.6M shrunk median for 1990s/large (n=3) (pre-stardom rate)
1995Supporting$60,000,000$187,400,000$365,063
Léon: The Professional
no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $10.0M shrunk median for 1990s/small (n=1) (pre-stardom rate); soft-breakthrough weight 0.00
1994Lead$16,000,000$46,100,000$250,050

Cómo funcionan las figuras modeladas. An undisclosed lead role after the breakthrough gets the median of disclosed lead salaries for its era and budget band, capped at 15% of the film’s budget. Supporting and pre-breakthrough roles get 2.5% of that median, the documented going rate for actors before stardom. Films with no reported budget are treated as small productions. Undocumented backend, endorsements, and producer or director credits enter as separate estimated lines in the calculation above, built from disclosed medians. Every median comes from the published tables on our página de metodología.

Patrimonio neto Over Time

$20M$40M$60M19942001200820152026$66.8 Million1994: $24,2401995: $86,1761996: $327,5011997: $369,5881998: $411,7041999: $505,6872000: $596,9092001: $601,5262002: $609,0912003: $786,9632004: $1,073,7042005: $1,479,6282006: $2,171,8782007: $2,911,4222008: $3,297,1372009: $4,265,5132010: $7,979,9042011: $13,465,9182012: $17,336,8242013: $22,681,3752014: $25,027,2962015: $27,966,0372016: $30,113,2092017: $33,315,3822018: $35,810,5082019: $40,308,5302020: $43,456,9672021: $47,239,5072022: $44,553,6142023: $49,322,3262024: $53,273,9132025: $57,162,0392026: $66,791,855

Saldo modelado al final de cada año, que coincide con la tabla año por año a continuación.

Año tras año

Natalie Portman year by year model
YearIncomeHonorarios de representanteTasa impositivaSpentSavedBalance
2026$162,232$24,33545%$68,502$7,342$66,791,855
2025$167,957$25,19445%$70,919$7,601$57,162,039
2024$167,957$25,19445%$70,919$7,601$53,273,913
2023$3,720,685$558,10345%$958,768$780,652$49,322,326
2022$2,539,252$380,88845%$654,330$532,771$44,553,614
2021$811,520$121,72845%$255,858$123,528$47,239,507
2020$1,007,451$151,11845%$317,631$153,352$43,456,967
2019$3,275,848$491,37745%$844,140$687,319$40,308,530
2018$10,964,776$1,644,71645%$2,825,469$2,300,564$35,810,508
2017$4,501,592$675,23947%$1,117,816$910,152$33,315,382
2016$3,306,093$495,91445%$851,934$693,665$30,113,209
2015$11,108,724$1,666,30945%$2,862,563$2,330,766$27,966,037
2014$4,580,227$687,03445%$1,180,260$960,996$25,027,296
2013$18,547,367$2,782,10547%$4,605,600$3,749,988$22,681,375
2012$13,666,314$2,049,94743%$3,649,677$2,971,652$17,336,824
2011$23,820,362$3,573,05443%$6,361,380$5,179,585$13,465,918
2010$15,742,149$2,361,32243%$4,204,042$3,423,030$7,979,904
2009$3,004,903$450,73543%$802,479$653,397$4,265,513
2008$2,982,915$447,43743%$796,607$648,616$3,297,137
2007$2,948,319$442,24843%$787,368$641,093$2,911,422
2006$2,731,135$409,67043%$729,367$593,868$2,171,878
2005$1,686,965$253,04543%$450,515$366,820$1,479,628
2004$1,122,089$168,31343%$299,661$243,991$1,073,704
2003$749,129$112,36943%$244,775$118,177$786,963
2002$264,997$39,75046%$95,944$25,689$609,091
2001$109,687$16,45346%$45,473$4,874$601,526
2000$556,941$83,54146%$172,401$83,235$596,909
1999$433,301$64,99546%$134,128$64,757$505,687
1998$71,908$10,78646%$29,811$3,195$411,704
1997$71,908$10,78646%$29,811$3,195$369,588
1996$1,138,483$170,77246%$288,037$234,527$327,501
1995$392,446$58,86746%$121,482$58,651$86,176
1994$250,050$37,50846%$90,533$24,240$24,240

Model Notes

  • salary comps: 2 disclosed lead fee(s) flagged as non-market outliers (scale / far-below-quote) and excluded from era medians
Reproduce este número. Una estimación del patrimonio neto debería ser reproducible del mismo modo que lo es un hallazgo científico: las mismas aportaciones públicas y las mismas tarifas publicadas deberían dar siempre la misma respuesta. Los presupuestos cinematográficos y la taquilla son informes públicos. Cada salario, tasa de honorarios, tasa impositiva, tasa de ahorro y rendimiento de referencia divulgados se publica con citas en nuestro página de metodología. Undisclosed lead roles use the median of disclosed salaries for their era and budget band, capped at 15% of the film’s budget. Supporting and early-career roles use the documented pre-stardom fraction of that median. Undocumented backend, endorsements, and hyphenate credits enter as estimated lines from disclosed medians. Apply the rates year by year as shown above and you will land on $66.8 Million.

Metodología

We rebuild Natalie’s career as a yearly time series. Disclosed salaries and documented backend enter as reported, with citations. Undisclosed lead roles get the median of disclosed salaries for their era and budget band, capped at 15% of the film’s budget. Supporting roles and roles from before the breakthrough get 2.5% of that median, the going-rate ratio measured from disclosed pre-stardom deals. Films with no reported budget are treated as small productions, and every role is estimated unless a source documents it was unpaid. Representation fees come out at sourced rates, taxes follow the eras actually lived through, spending follows measured household savings behavior unless court documents say otherwise, and what remains compounds at real market returns. Undocumented backend enters as an expected value from disclosed deals, endorsements at the median disclosed ambassador fee, and producer or director credits at union-scale floors.

El modelo completo, cada tabla de tarifas y cómo nuestras estimaciones se han comparado con ofertas reales están en el sitio. página de metodología.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Natalie Portman's net worth in 2026?

As of 2026, Natalie Portman's net worth is an estimated $66.8 Million. The estimate is built film by film from disclosed salaries and documented backend, then year by year: income, minus representation fees and taxes, minus spending, compounded at real market returns.

How does Natalie Portman make money?

Film salaries she has largely kept private: her own disclosure that Thor: Love and Thunder paid $1.2M shows how far below the comps medians her fees ran. Her Dior partnership enters at the median disclosed ambassador fee and her documented Black Swan points at the median disclosed backend rate.

How is Natalie Portman's net worth calculated?

Disclosed paydays enter as reported, with citations. Undisclosed lead roles use the median of disclosed salaries for their era and budget band, capped at 15% of the film's budget, and supporting or early-career roles use the documented pre-stardom fraction of that median. We subtract sourced representation fees, taxes for the years Natalie actually worked, and spending from measured savings behavior, then compound at real market returns. Undocumented backend, endorsements, and producing credits enter as estimated lines from disclosed medians. Every rate and source is published.

How much does Natalie Portman make per film?

Varía según el papel y la época, y la tabla película por película anterior enumera el pago contado para cada título. Los días de pago divulgados ingresan según lo informado. Los papeles no revelados se modelan a partir de lo que ganaron actores comparables en la misma época y rango de presupuesto, siendo los papeles principales después del gran avance los que ganan más y los papeles secundarios o iniciales una fracción documentada de eso.

¿Por qué el tipo impositivo es tan alto y los actores no lo evitan con una empresa de préstamo?

Tax comes out at the effective rate for where Natalie lived each year, which is the rate shown in the year-by-year table. In a high-tax state like California, combined federal and state income tax reaches close to half of a top earner's income, so those years run in the mid-40s percent. A loan-out company, the corporation many actors run their income through, does not lower the tax on the money they take home. Its real advantage is deducting business costs such as agent, manager, and attorney fees, and the model already subtracts those as a separate line before any tax is applied. High-earning performers also fall outside the pass-through business deduction that other company owners can claim, so it buys them no rate cut.

¿Por qué esta cifra es diferente a la de otros sitios de patrimonio neto?

Most sites publish a single number with no way to check it. This estimate is built in the open: every salary, rate, and assumption is on the page, and the página de metodología lists every source.

¿Qué tan precisa es esta estimación?

Ninguna estimación del patrimonio neto de un particular es exacta; éste es un modelo construido a partir de datos públicos. La diferencia es que puedes ver cómo se construyó y comprobar cada paso. El grado de confianza cerca de la parte superior del cálculo muestra qué parte de la cifra se basa en números revelados, y la página indica dónde se apoya un número en una suposición.

Is Natalie Portman rich compared to the average person?

Yes. A net worth of $66.8 Million is far above the median American household, which sits near $193,000 according to Federal Reserve data.

What is Natalie Portman's biggest source of wealth?

On this page it is film salaries, the largest line in the calculation at $69.2 Million. The full breakdown, with every other line and its source, is above.

How much does Natalie Portman make from endorsements?

The model counts $16.0 Million in career endorsement income for Natalie: 1 named partnerships x the $4.0M annual fee from the median disclosed film deal x a 4-year term, spread across the deal years. It is an estimate, since the individual deal values are not all public, and it sits as its own line in the calculation above.

What businesses does Natalie Portman own?

The stake counted on this page is Angel City FC founding stake. It is valued from a reported transaction or a revenue multiple, and shown as its own line in the calculation above with the basis next to it.

Explora otros actores

Acerca de NetWorth Explained

We originally created NWE because nobody in the public-figure net worth space showed their work. Magazines and sites threw out big numbers while hiding behind vague claims of “proprietary algorithms” o “insider knowledge.” That’s why we started the world’s only publication that transparently showed every assumption, every variable, and every calculation. We’re still the only ones who do it this way. Leer más sobre NetWorth Explained.