$310.9 Million
Akshay Kumar Patrimoine net 2026
Dernière mise à jour August 3, 2026
As of 2026, Akshay Kumar has an estimated net worth of $310.9 Million, computed film by film and year by year from public records and published rates. Every input, rate, and source behind the number is on this page.
Calculation
- Salaires divulgués et backend documenté, chacun avec une citation
- Rôles non divulgués modélisés à partir de comparables divulgués pour leur époque, leur tranche budgétaire et leur étape de carrière
- Backend, avenants et crédits de production estimés à partir des médianes divulguées
Fast Facts
| Birthdate | September 9, 1967 |
|---|---|
| Birthplace | New Delhi |
| Breakthrough | Amaanat (1994) |
| Best Known | Hera Pheri (2000) |
Who Is Akshay Kumar?
Akshay Kumar was born September 9, 1967 in New Delhi, best known for Hera Pheri (2000). The earnings behind Akshay's net worth come from film salaries, backend participation, and endorsement deals.
The model tracks Akshay's earning years from 1986 to 2026, with the biggest single year in 2004 at about $46.8 Million of gross income. After representation fees, taxes, and living costs, what stays invested compounds at market returns into an estimated $310.9 Million today.
Data
Chaque ligne ci-dessous est calculée à partir des données publiques et des tableaux de tarifs publiés sur notre page méthodologie. Confiance: Catégorie C. Les chiffres documentés ne couvrent qu’une petite partie de ce chiffre, de sorte que la majeure partie est modélisée à partir de taux publiés et de comparables (les notes vont de A, principalement documentées, à C, principalement modélisées).
The Calculation
| Line | Amount |
|---|---|
| Revenue | |
| Film pay, modeled lead roles (139 of 177 films) era and budget-band medians of disclosed lead salaries (winsorized, thin cells shrunk toward the era median), blended with this actor's disclosed quote history when available; soft breakthrough blend near the career break year | $480,326,332 |
| Film pay, modeled post-breakthrough supporting roles (26 of 177 films) 12.0% of lead cells: lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio | $32,167,212 |
| Film pay, modeled supporting and early roles (12 of 177 films) 2,5% des médianes de l'époque : le taux de pré-célébrité | $12,849,151 |
| Points back-end, estimés 12% of disclosed lead deals included points, at a median 2.6% of box office; expected value on 110 commercially viable undisclosed lead roles; cash spread over 3 years; 29 film(s) used band-specific box-office/budget multiples as a gross proxy | $29,152,853 |
| Approbations, estimées (3 partenariats de marque) 3 named partnerships x the $4.0M annual fee from the median disclosed film deal x a 4-year term, spread across the deal years | $48,000,000 |
| Résidus, estimés SAG residual rates on post-theatrical receipts assumed at half of box office, split by role share and spread over the ten years after each release; 48 film(s) used band-specific box-office proxies | $63,823,465 |
| Retour sur investissement de l'épargne mixed portfolio: 55% actual 60/40 securities returns (taxed) + 45% US long-run home-price rate on the rest | $172,351,121 |
| Expenses | |
| Frais de représentation agent 10% + avocat 5% | -$98,437,848 |
| Taxes Taux effectifs US-CA, année par année | -$249,032,101 |
| Dépenses personnelles measured household savings rates by income, times a 88% entertainment-household factor | -$170,255,494 |
| Valeur nette estimée | $310,877,998 |
Film par film
| Film | Year | Role | Budget | Billetterie | Salaire compté |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bhooth Bangla no disclosed fee: modeled on the $25.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid), capped at $2.1M | 2026 | Lead | $13,768,032 | $28,371,325 | $2,065,205 |
| Film has not yet been released no disclosed fee: modeled on the $23.8M shrunk median for 2020s/large (n=2), capped at $10.5M | 2026 | Lead | $70,000,000 | – | $10,500,000 |
| Haiwaan no disclosed fee: modeled on the $23.8M shrunk median for 2020s/large (n=2), capped at $10.5M | 2026 | Lead | $70,000,000 | – | $10,500,000 |
| Naagin 7 no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $23.8M shrunk median for 2020s/large (n=2) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio) | 2026 | Supporting | $70,000,000 | – | $2,850,000 |
| Welcome to the Jungle no disclosed fee: modeled on the $25.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid), capped at $2.2M | 2026 | Lead | $14,341,700 | $22,447,629 | $2,151,255 |
| Wheel of Fortune India no disclosed fee: modeled on the $23.8M shrunk median for 2020s/large (n=2), capped at $10.5M | 2026 | Lead | $70,000,000 | – | $10,500,000 |
| Housefull 5 no disclosed fee: modeled on the $21.7M shrunk median for 2020s/mid (n=1), capped at $3.9M | 2025 | Lead | $25,815,060 | $27,857,318 | $3,872,259 |
| Jolly LLB 3 no disclosed fee: modeled on the $25.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid), capped at $2.1M | 2025 | Lead | $13,768,032 | $19,052,662 | $2,065,205 |
| Kannappa no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $21.7M shrunk median for 2020s/mid (n=1) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio) | 2025 | Supporting | $22,946,720 | $5,277,746 | $2,600,000 |
| Kesari Chapter 2 no disclosed fee: modeled on the $25.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid), capped at $2.6M | 2025 | Lead | $17,210,040 | $16,426,983 | $2,581,506 |
| Sky Force no disclosed fee: modeled on the $25.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid), capped at $2.8M | 2025 | Lead | $18,357,376 | $19,376,210 | $2,753,606 |
| Akshay Kumar no disclosed fee: modeled on the $23.8M shrunk median for 2020s/large (n=2), capped at $10.5M | 2024 | Lead | $70,000,000 | – | $10,500,000 |
| Bade Miyan Chote Miyan no disclosed fee: modeled on the $21.7M shrunk median for 2020s/mid (n=1), capped at $6.3M | 2024 | Lead | $41,831,370 | $12,209,979 | $6,274,706 |
| Khel Khel Mein no disclosed fee: modeled on the $25.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid), capped at $1.8M | 2024 | Lead | $11,951,820 | $6,786,243 | $1,792,773 |
| Sarfira no disclosed fee: modeled on the $25.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid), capped at $1.4M | 2024 | Lead | $9,561,456 | $3,587,936 | $1,434,218 |
| Singham Again no disclosed fee: modeled on the $23.8M shrunk median for 2020s/large (n=2), capped at $10.5M | 2024 | Lead | $70,000,000 | $46,944,578 | $10,500,000 |
| Stree 2 no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $25.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio), capped at 15% of budget | 2024 | Supporting | $12,549,411 | $104,528,227 | $1,882,412 |
| Kya Loge Tum no disclosed fee: modeled on the $23.8M shrunk median for 2020s/large (n=2), capped at $10.5M | 2023 | Lead | $70,000,000 | – | $10,500,000 |
| Mission Raniganj no disclosed fee: modeled on the $25.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid), capped at $1.0M | 2023 | Lead | $6,658,652 | $5,527,892 | $998,798 |
| OMG 2 no disclosed fee: modeled on the $25.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid), capped at $0.9M | 2023 | Lead | $6,053,320 | $26,765,360 | $907,998 |
| Selfiee no disclosed fee: modeled on the $25.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid), capped at $1.8M | 2023 | Lead | $12,106,640 | $2,860,799 | $1,815,996 |
| An Action Hero no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $23.8M shrunk median for 2020s/large (n=2) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio) | 2022 | Supporting | $70,000,000 | – | $2,850,000 |
| Bachchhan Paandey no disclosed fee: modeled on the $25.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid), capped at $2.5M | 2022 | Lead | $16,538,496 | $9,308,629 | $2,480,774 |
| Cuttputlli no disclosed fee: modeled on the $25.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid), capped at $2.9M | 2022 | Lead | $19,082,880 | – | $2,862,432 |
| India's Ultimate Warrior no disclosed fee: modeled on the $23.8M shrunk median for 2020s/large (n=2), capped at $10.5M | 2022 | Lead | $70,000,000 | – | $10,500,000 |
| Raksha Bandhan no disclosed fee: modeled on the $25.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid), capped at $1.3M | 2022 | Lead | $8,905,344 | $7,837,975 | $1,335,802 |
| Ram Setu no disclosed fee: modeled on the $25.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid), capped at $2.9M | 2022 | Lead | $19,082,880 | $11,823,752 | $2,862,432 |
| Samrat Prithviraj no disclosed fee: modeled on the $21.7M shrunk median for 2020s/mid (n=1), capped at $5.7M | 2022 | Lead | $38,165,760 | $11,490,438 | $5,724,864 |
| Atrangi Re no disclosed fee: modeled on the $23.8M shrunk median for 2020s/large (n=2), capped at $10.5M | 2021 | Lead | $70,000,000 | – | $10,500,000 |
| Bell Bottom no disclosed fee: modeled on the $21.7M shrunk median for 2020s/mid (n=1), capped at $3.0M | 2021 | Lead | $20,292,750 | $6,842,715 | $3,043,912 |
| Filhaal 2: Mohabbat no disclosed fee: modeled on the $23.8M shrunk median for 2020s/large (n=2), capped at $10.5M | 2021 | Lead | $70,000,000 | – | $10,500,000 |
| Sooryavanshi no disclosed fee: modeled on the $21.7M shrunk median for 2020s/mid (n=1), capped at $3.2M | 2021 | Lead | $21,645,600 | $39,896,899 | $3,246,840 |
| Into The Wild With Bear Grylls no disclosed fee: modeled on the $23.8M shrunk median for 2020s/large (n=2), capped at $10.5M | 2020 | Lead | $70,000,000 | – | $10,500,000 |
| Laxmii no disclosed fee: modeled on the $23.8M shrunk median for 2020s/large (n=2), capped at $10.5M | 2020 | Lead | $70,000,000 | – | $10,500,000 |
| Vishal Mishra (composer) no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $23.8M shrunk median for 2020s/large (n=2) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio) | 2020 | Supporting | $70,000,000 | – | $2,850,000 |
| Blank no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio) | 2019 | Supporting | $40,000,000 | $910,248 | $1,320,000 |
| Fear Factor: Khatron Ke Khiladi 9 no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio) | 2019 | Supporting | $40,000,000 | – | $1,320,000 |
| Filhall no disclosed fee: modeled on the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3), capped at $6.0M | 2019 | Lead | $40,000,000 | – | $6,000,000 |
| Good Newwz no disclosed fee: modeled on the $5.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid), capped at $1.5M | 2019 | Lead | $9,940,308 | $45,238,342 | $1,491,046 |
| Housefull 4 no disclosed fee: modeled on the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3), capped at $3.2M | 2019 | Lead | $21,300,660 | $40,916,438 | $3,195,099 |
| Kesari no disclosed fee: modeled on the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3), capped at $6.0M | 2019 | Lead | $40,000,000 | $29,407,691 | $6,000,000 |
| Mission Mangal no disclosed fee: modeled on the $5.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid), capped at $0.9M | 2019 | Lead | $5,680,176 | $41,265,059 | $852,026 |
| 2.0 no disclosed fee: modeled on the $20.0M shrunk median for 2010s/large (n=8), capped at $13.2M | 2018 | Lead | $87,732,780 | $116,977,040 | $13,159,916 |
| Gold no disclosed fee: modeled on the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3), capped at $6.0M | 2018 | Lead | $40,000,000 | $23,102,965 | $5,999,999 |
| Pad Man no disclosed fee: modeled on the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3), capped at $6.0M | 2018 | Lead | $40,000,000 | $30,374,551 | $5,999,999 |
| Simmba no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $5.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio) | 2018 | Supporting | $11,697,704 | $58,516,302 | $600,000 |
| Jolly LLB 2 no disclosed fee: modeled on the $5.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid), capped at $1.8M | 2017 | Lead | $12,284,720 | $30,301,797 | $1,842,708 |
| Naam Shabana no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $5.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio), capped at 15% of budget | 2017 | Supporting | $3,838,975 | $8,613,124 | $575,846 |
| The Great Indian Laughter Challenge no disclosed fee: modeled on the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3), capped at $6.0M | 2017 | Lead | $40,000,000 | – | $5,999,999 |
| Toilet: Ek Prem Katha no disclosed fee: modeled on the $5.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid), capped at $1.7M | 2017 | Lead | $11,516,925 | $47,833,628 | $1,727,538 |
| Airlift no disclosed fee: modeled on the $5.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid), capped at $0.7M | 2016 | Lead | $4,464,597 | $32,988,907 | $669,689 |
| Dishoom no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $5.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio) | 2016 | Supporting | $8,185,094 | $17,795,884 | $600,000 |
| Housefull 3 no disclosed fee: modeled on the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3), capped at $6.0M | 2016 | Lead | $40,000,000 | $29,019,880 | $5,999,998 |
| Rustom no disclosed fee: modeled on the $5.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid), capped at $1.1M | 2016 | Lead | $7,482,665 | $32,460,597 | $1,122,399 |
| Baby no disclosed fee: modeled on the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3), capped at $6.0M | 2015 | Lead | $40,000,000 | – | $5,999,995 |
| Frères no disclosed fee: modeled on the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3), capped at $6.0M | 2015 | Lead | $40,000,000 | $21,869,950 | $5,999,995 |
| Gabbar Is Back no disclosed fee: modeled on the $5.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid), capped at $1.8M | 2015 | Lead | $12,314,512 | $21,170,049 | $1,847,175 |
| Hey Bro no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio) | 2015 | Supporting | $40,000,000 | – | $1,319,999 |
| Singh Is Bling no disclosed fee: modeled on the $5.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid), capped at $1.6M | 2015 | Lead | $10,911,593 | $23,241,693 | $1,636,738 |
| Dare 2 Dance no disclosed fee: modeled on the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3), capped at $6.0M | 2014 | Lead | $40,000,000 | – | $5,999,991 |
| Entertainment no disclosed fee: modeled on the $5.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid), capped at $2.0M | 2014 | Lead | $13,272,263 | $18,995,722 | $1,990,836 |
| Fugly no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $5.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio), capped at 15% of budget | 2014 | Supporting | $1,638,551 | $2,228,429 | $245,782 |
| Holiday no disclosed fee: modeled on the $5.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid), capped at $1.2M | 2014 | Lead | $8,192,755 | $29,493,918 | $1,228,911 |
| The Shaukeens no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $5.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio) | 2014 | Supporting | $7,586,491 | $7,586,491 | $599,999 |
| Bhaji in Problem no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $5.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio), capped at 15% of budget | 2013 | Supporting | $853,274 | $2,901,130 | $127,991 |
| Bombay Talkies no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $5.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio) | 2013 | Supporting | $5,119,641 | $1,706,547 | $599,999 |
| Boss no disclosed fee: modeled on the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3), capped at $6.0M | 2013 | Lead | $40,000,000 | – | $5,999,982 |
| Jamai Raja no disclosed fee: modeled on the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3), capped at $6.0M | 2013 | Lead | $40,000,000 | – | $5,999,982 |
| Once Upon A Time in Mumbai Dobaara! no disclosed fee: modeled on the $5.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid), capped at $2.2M | 2013 | Lead | $14,505,650 | $15,649,036 | $2,175,841 |
| Special 26 no disclosed fee: modeled on the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3), capped at $6.0M | 2013 | Lead | $40,000,000 | $17,577,434 | $5,999,982 |
| Taarak Mehta Ka Ooltah Chashmah no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio) | 2013 | Supporting | $40,000,000 | – | $1,319,997 |
| Himself no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio) | 2012 | Supporting | $40,000,000 | – | $1,319,994 |
| Housefull 2 no disclosed fee: modeled on the $5.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid), capped at $1.7M | 2012 | Lead | $11,602,395 | $34,807,184 | $1,740,349 |
| Joker no disclosed fee: modeled on the $20.0M shrunk median for 2010s/large (n=8), capped at $8.2M | 2012 | Lead | $55,000,000 | $1,074,458,282 | $8,249,952 |
| Khiladi 786 no disclosed fee: modeled on the $5.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid), capped at $1.8M | 2012 | Lead | $11,789,530 | $20,023,488 | $1,768,419 |
| OMG – Oh My God! no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $5.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio), capped at 15% of budget | 2012 | Supporting | $3,740,837 | $28,051,596 | $561,123 |
| Rowdy Rathore no disclosed fee: modeled on the $5.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid), capped at $1.7M | 2012 | Lead | $11,228,124 | $38,061,469 | $1,684,209 |
| Breakaway no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $5.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio) | 2011 | Supporting | $12,000,000 | – | $599,994 |
| Chalo Dilli no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio) | 2011 | Supporting | $40,000,000 | – | $1,319,987 |
| Desi Boyz no disclosed fee: modeled on the $5.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid), capped at $1.2M | 2011 | Lead | $7,831,325 | $9,277,108 | $1,174,686 |
| Thank You no disclosed fee: modeled on the $5.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid), capped at $1.9M | 2011 | Lead | $12,856,098 | $22,283,903 | $1,928,393 |
| Action Replayy no disclosed fee: modeled on the $5.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid), capped at $2.0M | 2010 | Lead | $13,121,694 | $10,497,355 | $1,968,211 |
| Housefull no disclosed fee: modeled on the $5.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid), capped at $1.0M | 2010 | Lead | $6,560,847 | $27,227,515 | $984,107 |
| Khatta Meetha no disclosed fee: modeled on the $5.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid), capped at $1.1M | 2010 | Lead | $7,654,321 | $13,731,853 | $1,148,124 |
| Tees Maar Khan no disclosed fee: modeled on the $5.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid), capped at $0.8M | 2010 | Lead | $5,421,686 | $12,275,903 | $813,237 |
| 8 x 10 Tasveer no disclosed fee: modeled on the $19.4M shrunk median for 2000s/mid (n=2), capped at $6.0M | 2009 | Lead | $40,000,000 | $4,871,371 | $5,999,750 |
| Blue no disclosed fee: modeled on the $18.8M median for its era and nearest band (mid), capped at $2.3M | 2009 | Lead | $15,494,182 | $13,201,043 | $2,324,043 |
| Chandni Chowk to China no disclosed fee: modeled on the $20.0M shrunk median for 2000s/blockbuster (n=1) | 2009 | Lead | $800,000,000 | $1,200,000,000 | $19,999,115 |
| De Dana Dan no disclosed fee: modeled on the $18.8M median for its era and nearest band (mid), capped at $1.2M | 2009 | Lead | $8,263,564 | $16,919,647 | $1,239,500 |
| Kambakkht Ishq no disclosed fee: modeled on the $20.0M shrunk median for 2000s/blockbuster (n=1) | 2009 | Lead | $650,000,000 | – | $19,999,115 |
| Jumbo no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $19.4M shrunk median for 2000s/mid (n=2) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio) | 2008 | Supporting | $40,000,000 | – | $2,324,837 |
| Singh Is Kinng no disclosed fee: modeled on the $19.4M shrunk median for 2000s/mid (n=2), capped at $6.0M | 2008 | Lead | $40,000,000 | – | $5,999,512 |
| Tashan no disclosed fee: modeled on the $18.8M median for its era and nearest band (mid), capped at $1.1M | 2008 | Lead | $7,125,589 | $11,722,743 | $1,068,785 |
| Bhool Bhulaiyaa no disclosed fee: modeled on the $18.8M median for its era and nearest band (mid), capped at $1.2M | 2007 | Lead | $7,739,088 | $19,916,059 | $1,160,744 |
| Heyy Babyy no disclosed fee: modeled on the $19.4M shrunk median for 2000s/mid (n=2), capped at $6.0M | 2007 | Lead | $40,000,000 | $10,000,000 | $5,999,050 |
| Namastey London no disclosed fee: modeled on the $18.8M median for its era and nearest band (mid), capped at $0.8M | 2007 | Lead | $5,078,776 | $17,267,840 | $761,766 |
| Om Shanti Om no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $18.8M median for its era and nearest band (mid) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio), capped at 15% of budget | 2007 | Supporting | $4,819,277 | $18,313,253 | $722,848 |
| Welcome no disclosed fee: modeled on the $18.8M median for its era and nearest band (mid), capped at $1.1M | 2007 | Lead | $7,255,395 | $28,516,121 | $1,088,203 |
| Bhagam Bhag no disclosed fee: modeled on the $18.8M median for its era and nearest band (mid), capped at $1.1M | 2006 | Lead | $7,062,925 | $14,968,986 | $1,059,241 |
| Family no disclosed fee: modeled on the $18.8M median for its era and nearest band (mid), capped at $0.8M | 2006 | Lead | $5,517,910 | $3,220,252 | $827,566 |
| Humko Deewana Kar Gaye no disclosed fee: modeled on the $18.8M median for its era and nearest band (mid), capped at $0.6M | 2006 | Lead | $3,752,179 | $5,959,343 | $562,795 |
| Jaan-E-Mann no disclosed fee: modeled on the $18.8M median for its era and nearest band (mid), capped at $1.3M | 2006 | Lead | $8,828,656 | $5,573,493 | $1,324,011 |
| Mere Jeevan Saathi no disclosed fee: modeled on the $18.8M median for its era and nearest band (mid), capped at $0.4M | 2006 | Lead | $2,427,880 | $1,726,002 | $364,182 |
| Phir Hera Pheri no disclosed fee: modeled on the $18.8M median for its era and nearest band (mid), capped at $0.6M | 2006 | Lead | $3,972,895 | $15,255,918 | $595,892 |
| Bewafaa no disclosed fee: modeled on the $11.8M shrunk median for 2000s/tentpole (n=9) | 2005 | Lead | $180,000,000 | $331,800,000 | $11,810,658 |
| Deewane Huye Paagal no disclosed fee: modeled on the $18.8M median for its era and nearest band (mid), capped at $0.7M | 2005 | Lead | $4,535,150 | $6,009,074 | $680,134 |
| Dosti: Friends Forever no disclosed fee: modeled on the $11.8M shrunk median for 2000s/tentpole (n=9) | 2005 | Lead | $150,000,000 | $230,000,000 | $11,810,658 |
| Garam Masala no disclosed fee: modeled on the $18.8M median for its era and nearest band (mid), capped at $0.6M | 2005 | Lead | $3,854,878 | $12,392,297 | $578,160 |
| Insan no disclosed fee: modeled on the $18.8M median for its era and nearest band (mid), capped at $0.4M | 2005 | Lead | $2,834,469 | $2,360,546 | $425,170 |
| Waqt no disclosed fee: modeled on the $18.8M median for its era and nearest band (mid), capped at $0.5M | 2005 | Lead | $3,628,120 | $9,632,659 | $544,169 |
| Aan: Men at Work no disclosed fee: modeled on the $19.4M shrunk median for 2000s/mid (n=2), capped at $6.0M | 2004 | Lead | $40,000,000 | – | $5,992,990 |
| Ab Tumhare Hawale Watan Saathiyo no disclosed fee: modeled on the $20.0M shrunk median for 2000s/blockbuster (n=1) | 2004 | Lead | $200,000,000 | $191,600,000 | $19,975,215 |
| Aitraaz no disclosed fee: modeled on the $18.8M median for its era and nearest band (mid), capped at $0.2M | 2004 | Lead | $1,325,301 | $3,132,530 | $198,795 |
| Fear Factor: Khatron Ke Khiladi no disclosed fee: modeled on the $19.4M shrunk median for 2000s/mid (n=2), capped at $6.0M | 2004 | Lead | $40,000,000 | – | $5,992,990 |
| Hatya no disclosed fee: modeled on the $19.4M shrunk median for 2000s/mid (n=2), capped at $6.0M | 2004 | Lead | $40,000,000 | – | $5,992,990 |
| Khakee no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $18.8M median for its era and nearest band (mid) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio), capped at 15% of budget | 2004 | Supporting | $5,737,428 | $10,018,432 | $860,116 |
| Meri Biwi Ka Jawaab Nahin no disclosed fee: modeled on the $19.4M shrunk median for 2000s/mid (n=2), capped at $3.4M | 2004 | Lead | $22,500,000 | $3,900,000 | $3,371,326 |
| Mujhse Shaadi Karogi no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $18.8M median for its era and nearest band (mid) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio), capped at 15% of budget | 2004 | Supporting | $1,807,228 | $6,746,987 | $271,084 |
| Police Force no disclosed fee: modeled on the $19.4M shrunk median for 2000s/mid (n=2), capped at $6.0M | 2004 | Lead | $40,000,000 | – | $5,992,990 |
| Seven Deadly Arts with Akshay Kumar no disclosed fee: modeled on the $19.4M shrunk median for 2000s/mid (n=2), capped at $6.0M | 2004 | Lead | $40,000,000 | – | $5,992,990 |
| Andaaz no disclosed fee: modeled on the $18.8M median for its era and nearest band (mid), capped at $0.2M | 2003 | Lead | $1,114,457 | $3,471,084 | $167,169 |
| Talaash no disclosed fee: modeled on the $19.4M shrunk median for 2000s/mid (n=2), capped at $6.0M | 2003 | Lead | $40,000,000 | – | $5,986,362 |
| Aankhen no disclosed fee: modeled on the $19.4M shrunk median for 2000s/mid (n=2), capped at $6.0M | 2001 | Lead | $40,000,000 | – | $5,948,617 |
| Ajnabee no disclosed fee: modeled on the $18.8M median for its era and nearest band (mid), capped at $0.5M | 2001 | Lead | $3,602,732 | $6,745,585 | $539,742 |
| Awara Paagal Deewana no disclosed fee: modeled on the $18.8M median for its era and nearest band (mid), capped at $0.4M | 2001 | Lead | $2,755,030 | $5,827,948 | $413,254 |
| Ek Rishtaa: The Bond of Love no disclosed fee: modeled on the $18.8M median for its era and nearest band (mid), capped at $0.5M | 2001 | Lead | $3,178,881 | $7,735,277 | $476,757 |
| Haan Maine Bhi Pyaar Kiya no disclosed fee: modeled on the $18.8M median for its era and nearest band (mid), capped at $0.3M | 2001 | Lead | $2,331,179 | $4,143,142 | $349,677 |
| Jaani Dushman no disclosed fee: modeled on the $19.4M shrunk median for 2000s/mid (n=2), capped at $6.0M | 2001 | Lead | $40,000,000 | $90,000,000 | $5,948,617 |
| Marathi language no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $19.4M shrunk median for 2000s/mid (n=2) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio) | 2001 | Supporting | $40,000,000 | – | $2,307,853 |
| Dhadkan no disclosed fee: modeled on the $18.8M median for its era and nearest band (mid), capped at $0.3M | 2000 | Lead | $2,002,599 | $5,889,866 | $300,390 |
| Hera Pheri no disclosed fee: modeled on the $18.8M median for its era and nearest band (mid), capped at $0.3M | 2000 | Lead | $1,668,832 | $4,761,735 | $250,325 |
| Khiladi 420 no disclosed fee: modeled on the $18.8M median for its era and nearest band (mid), capped at $0.3M | 2000 | Lead | $1,780,088 | $2,269,612 | $267,013 |
| Aarzoo no disclosed fee: modeled on the $2.0M median for its era and nearest band (small), capped at $0.2M | 1999 | Lead | $1,161,294 | $2,090,329 | $169,916 |
| International Khiladi no disclosed fee: modeled on the $14.4M shrunk median for 1990s/mid (n=6), capped at $3.9M | 1999 | Lead | $26,000,000 | – | $3,778,042 |
| Jaanwar no disclosed fee: modeled on the $2.0M median for its era and nearest band (small), capped at $0.2M | 1999 | Lead | $1,045,165 | $2,880,009 | $153,097 |
| Sangharsh no disclosed fee: modeled on the $2.0M median for its era and nearest band (small), capped at $0.1M | 1999 | Lead | $929,035 | $105,000,000 | $136,277 |
| Zulmi no disclosed fee: modeled on the $2.0M median for its era and nearest band (small), capped at $0.1M | 1999 | Lead | $812,906 | $1,145,036 | $119,458 |
| Angaaray no disclosed fee: modeled on the $2.0M median for its era and nearest band (small), capped at $0.1M | 1998 | Lead | $848,292 | $1,168,220 | $122,225 |
| Barood no disclosed fee: modeled on the $2.0M median for its era and nearest band (small), capped at $0.2M | 1998 | Lead | $1,333,031 | $2,081,951 | $190,212 |
| Keemat no disclosed fee: modeled on the $14.4M shrunk median for 1990s/mid (n=6), capped at $3.9M | 1998 | Lead | $26,000,000 | – | $3,669,969 |
| Aflatoon no disclosed fee: modeled on the $14.4M shrunk median for 1990s/mid (n=6), capped at $3.9M | 1997 | Lead | $26,000,000 | $2,183,774 | $3,477,947 |
| Daava no disclosed fee: modeled on the $2.0M median for its era and nearest band (small), capped at $0.2M | 1997 | Lead | $1,032,680 | $1,646,780 | $142,397 |
| Dil To Pagal Hai no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $2.0M median for its era and nearest band (small) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio) | 1997 | Supporting | $2,478,432 | $19,788,900 | $217,351 |
| Insaaf no disclosed fee: modeled on the $2.0M median for its era and nearest band (small), capped at $0.1M | 1997 | Lead | $963,835 | $1,828,532 | $133,302 |
| Lahoo Ke Do Rang no disclosed fee: modeled on the $14.4M shrunk median for 1990s/mid (n=6), capped at $3.9M | 1997 | Lead | $26,000,000 | – | $3,477,947 |
| Mr. and Mrs. Khiladi no disclosed fee: modeled on the $2.0M median for its era and nearest band (small), capped at $0.2M | 1997 | Lead | $1,583,442 | $4,612,637 | $215,164 |
| Tarazu no disclosed fee: modeled on the $2.0M median for its era and nearest band (small), capped at $0.2M | 1997 | Lead | $1,170,371 | $1,610,981 | $160,589 |
| Khiladiyon Ka Khiladi soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.79): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $2.0M median for its era and nearest band (small), capped at $0.3M vs early terms | 1996 | Lead | $1,904,994 | $7,097,868 | $236,570 |
| Sapoot soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.79): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $2.0M median for its era and nearest band (small), capped at $0.3M vs early terms | 1996 | Lead | $1,834,439 | $3,313,279 | $228,194 |
| Tu Chor Main Sipahi soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.79): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $2.0M median for its era and nearest band (small), capped at $0.2M vs early terms | 1996 | Lead | $1,199,441 | $3,042,347 | $152,815 |
| Maidan-E-Jung soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.66): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $2.0M median for its era and nearest band (small), capped at $0.2M vs early terms | 1995 | Lead | $1,002,249 | $72,300,000 | $116,299 |
| Nazar Ke Samne soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.66): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $2.0M median for its era and nearest band (small), capped at $0.1M vs early terms | 1995 | Lead | $385,480 | $659,942 | $55,168 |
| Paandav soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.66): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $2.0M median for its era and nearest band (small), capped at $0.1M vs early terms | 1995 | Lead | $462,576 | $894,314 | $62,810 |
| Sabse Bada Khiladi soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.66): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $2.0M median for its era and nearest band (small), capped at $0.2M vs early terms | 1995 | Lead | $1,233,537 | $4,949,568 | $139,222 |
| Amaanat soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.50): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $2.0M median for its era and nearest band (small), capped at $0.1M vs early terms | 1994 | Lead | $908,403 | $1,746,684 | $93,130 |
| Elaan soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.50): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $2.0M median for its era and nearest band (small), capped at $0.1M vs early terms | 1994 | Lead | $589,665 | $2,760,270 | $69,225 |
| Hum Hain Bemisaal soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.50): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $2.0M median for its era and nearest band (small), capped at $0.1M vs early terms | 1994 | Lead | $796,845 | $1,322,762 | $84,763 |
| Ikke Pe Ikka soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.50): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $2.0M median for its era and nearest band (small), capped at $0.0M vs early terms | 1994 | Lead | $318,738 | $2,980,199 | $47,811 |
| Jai Kishen soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.50): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $2.0M median for its era and nearest band (small), capped at $0.1M vs early terms | 1994 | Lead | $398,422 | $1,443,883 | $54,882 |
| Main Khiladi Tu Anari soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.50): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $2.0M median for its era and nearest band (small), capped at $0.2M vs early terms | 1994 | Lead | $1,035,898 | $4,411,333 | $102,692 |
| Mohra soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.50): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $2.0M median for its era and nearest band (small), capped at $0.2M vs early terms | 1994 | Lead | $1,195,267 | $7,219,413 | $114,645 |
| Suhaag soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.50): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $2.0M median for its era and nearest band (small), capped at $0.1M vs early terms | 1994 | Lead | $956,214 | $3,869,478 | $96,716 |
| Yeh Dillagi soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.50): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $2.0M median for its era and nearest band (small), capped at $0.1M vs early terms | 1994 | Lead | $637,476 | $3,432,807 | $72,811 |
| Zaalim soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.50): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $2.0M median for its era and nearest band (small), capped at $0.1M vs early terms | 1994 | Lead | $478,107 | $1,737,122 | $60,858 |
| Zakhmi Dil soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.50): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $2.0M median for its era and nearest band (small), capped at $0.0M vs early terms | 1994 | Lead | $270,927 | $433,484 | $40,639 |
| Ashaant soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.34): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $14.4M shrunk median for 1990s/mid (n=6), capped at $3.9M vs early terms | 1993 | Lead | $26,000,000 | – | $1,560,509 |
| Dil Ki Baazi soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.34): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $14.4M shrunk median for 1990s/mid (n=6), capped at $3.9M vs early terms | 1993 | Lead | $26,000,000 | – | $1,560,509 |
| Kayda Kanoon soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.34): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $14.4M shrunk median for 1990s/mid (n=6), capped at $3.9M vs early terms | 1993 | Lead | $26,000,000 | – | $1,560,509 |
| Sainik soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.34): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $14.4M shrunk median for 1990s/mid (n=6), capped at $3.9M vs early terms | 1993 | Lead | $26,000,000 | – | $1,560,509 |
| Vishnu Vijaya soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.34): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $14.4M shrunk median for 1990s/mid (n=6), capped at $3.9M vs early terms | 1993 | Lead | $26,000,000 | – | $1,560,509 |
| Waqt Hamara Hai soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.34): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $2.0M median for its era and nearest band (small), capped at $0.1M vs early terms | 1993 | Lead | $688,676 | $1,656,102 | $68,082 |
| Deedar soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.21): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $14.4M shrunk median for 1990s/mid (n=6), capped at $3.9M vs early terms | 1992 | Lead | $26,000,000 | – | $1,097,980 |
| Khiladi soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.21): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $14.4M shrunk median for 1990s/mid (n=6), capped at $3.9M vs early terms | 1992 | Lead | $26,000,000 | $1,543,324 | $1,097,980 |
| Mr. Bond soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.21): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $14.4M shrunk median for 1990s/mid (n=6), capped at $3.9M vs early terms | 1992 | Lead | $26,000,000 | – | $1,097,980 |
| Dancer no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $14.4M shrunk median for 1990s/mid (n=6) (pre-stardom rate); soft-breakthrough weight 0.12 | 1991 | Lead | $26,000,000 | $45,584,036 | $781,428 |
| Saugandh no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $14.4M shrunk median for 1990s/mid (n=6) (pre-stardom rate); soft-breakthrough weight 0.12 | 1991 | Lead | $26,000,000 | $879,413 | $781,428 |
| Aaj no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $4.1M shrunk median for pre1990/small (n=2) (pre-stardom rate); soft-breakthrough weight 0.01 | 1987 | Lead | $14,000,000 | – | $121,728 |
Comment fonctionnent les figures modélisées. An undisclosed lead role after the breakthrough gets the median of disclosed lead salaries for its era and budget band, capped at 15% of the film’s budget. Supporting and pre-breakthrough roles get 2.5% of that median, the documented going rate for actors before stardom. Films with no reported budget are treated as small productions. Undocumented backend, endorsements, and producer or director credits enter as separate estimated lines in the calculation above, built from disclosed medians. Every median comes from the published tables on our page méthodologie.
Patrimoine net Over Time
Solde modélisé à la fin de chaque année, correspondant au tableau année par année ci-dessous.
Année par année
| Year | Income | Frais de représentation | Taux d'imposition | Spent | Saved | Balance |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | $28,980,410 | $4,347,061 | 45% | $7,467,846 | $6,080,496 | $310,877,998 |
| 2025 | $22,977,085 | $3,446,563 | 45% | $5,920,873 | $4,820,914 | $298,747,859 |
| 2024 | $28,560,593 | $4,284,089 | 45% | $7,359,665 | $5,992,412 | $273,970,648 |
| 2023 | $21,598,042 | $3,239,706 | 45% | $5,565,513 | $4,531,572 | $248,136,383 |
| 2022 | $26,910,399 | $4,036,560 | 45% | $6,934,433 | $5,646,178 | $223,590,858 |
| 2021 | $30,153,810 | $4,523,072 | 45% | $7,770,215 | $6,326,692 | $233,880,100 |
| 2020 | $26,961,817 | $4,044,273 | 45% | $6,947,683 | $5,656,967 | $209,881,685 |
| 2019 | $25,373,890 | $3,806,084 | 45% | $6,538,496 | $5,323,797 | $190,099,561 |
| 2018 | $27,993,801 | $4,199,070 | 45% | $7,213,610 | $5,873,491 | $167,004,332 |
| 2017 | $18,694,347 | $2,804,152 | 47% | $4,642,098 | $3,779,705 | $160,195,300 |
| 2016 | $12,721,193 | $1,908,179 | 47% | $3,158,871 | $2,572,027 | $145,352,321 |
| 2015 | $18,435,933 | $2,765,390 | 47% | $4,577,930 | $3,727,458 | $135,726,067 |
| 2014 | $17,574,013 | $2,636,102 | 47% | $4,363,902 | $3,553,191 | $128,868,081 |
| 2013 | $23,904,733 | $3,585,710 | 47% | $5,935,918 | $4,833,164 | $118,103,491 |
| 2012 | $21,910,572 | $3,286,586 | 43% | $5,851,358 | $4,764,314 | $103,729,733 |
| 2011 | $15,483,027 | $2,322,454 | 43% | $4,134,841 | $3,366,685 | $92,770,224 |
| 2010 | $12,337,075 | $1,850,561 | 43% | $3,294,695 | $2,682,618 | $86,097,398 |
| 2009 | $41,351,112 | $6,202,667 | 43% | $11,043,079 | $8,991,535 | $78,081,337 |
| 2008 | $22,678,743 | $3,401,811 | 43% | $6,056,503 | $4,931,348 | $63,065,113 |
| 2007 | $11,374,054 | $1,706,108 | 43% | $3,037,514 | $2,473,215 | $63,904,326 |
| 2006 | $8,249,758 | $1,237,464 | 43% | $2,203,151 | $1,793,857 | $58,767,194 |
| 2005 | $21,263,758 | $3,189,564 | 43% | $5,678,623 | $4,623,668 | $53,421,289 |
| 2004 | $46,841,566 | $7,026,235 | 43% | $12,509,340 | $10,185,399 | $47,082,863 |
| 2003 | $21,458,342 | $3,218,751 | 43% | $5,730,587 | $4,665,979 | $34,996,374 |
| 2002 | $2,597,663 | $389,649 | 46% | $657,211 | $535,116 | $27,623,153 |
| 2001 | $12,008,635 | $1,801,295 | 46% | $3,038,194 | $2,473,769 | $27,929,554 |
| 2000 | $6,041,052 | $906,158 | 46% | $1,528,391 | $1,244,452 | $25,466,736 |
| 1999 | $3,918,463 | $587,769 | 46% | $991,374 | $807,200 | $23,845,642 |
| 1998 | $4,543,111 | $681,467 | 46% | $1,149,411 | $935,877 | $21,511,401 |
| 1997 | $19,123,806 | $2,868,571 | 46% | $4,838,338 | $3,939,489 | $18,615,203 |
| 1996 | $15,199,256 | $2,279,888 | 46% | $3,845,424 | $3,131,035 | $13,117,898 |
| 1995 | $12,805,719 | $1,920,858 | 46% | $3,239,857 | $2,637,968 | $9,256,648 |
| 1994 | $12,958,681 | $1,943,802 | 46% | $3,278,557 | $2,669,478 | $5,828,771 |
| 1993 | $5,852,900 | $877,935 | 46% | $1,480,788 | $1,205,693 | $3,102,944 |
| 1992 | $4,704,075 | $705,611 | 36% | $1,410,530 | $1,148,487 | $1,792,299 |
| 1991 | $2,091,711 | $313,757 | 36% | $627,205 | $510,685 | $613,598 |
| 1990 | $478,387 | $71,758 | 36% | $175,508 | $84,735 | $92,276 |
| 1989 | $9,530 | $1,430 | 36% | $4,683 | $502 | $7,344 |
| 1988 | $9,530 | $1,430 | 36% | $4,683 | $502 | $6,132 |
| 1987 | $85,209 | $12,781 | 45% | $35,979 | $3,856 | $5,258 |
| 1986 | $36,518 | $5,478 | 55% | $12,616 | $1,352 | $1,352 |
Model Notes
- PROCURATION DE RÉSIDENCE : résidence non recherchée individuellement pour ce lot ; US-CA par défaut appliqué jusqu'à ce que documenté
- salary comps: 2 disclosed lead fee(s) flagged as non-market outliers (scale / far-below-quote) and excluded from era medians
- Crédit image : Wikimedia Commons via Wikipedia (Akshay Kumar)
Reproduisez ce numéro. Une estimation de la valeur nette doit être reproductible de la même manière qu’une découverte scientifique : les mêmes contributions publiques et les mêmes tarifs publiés doivent toujours donner la même réponse. Les budgets des films et le box-office sont des rapports publics. Chaque salaire divulgué, taux de commission, taux d'imposition, taux d'épargne et rendement de référence est publié avec des citations sur notre page méthodologie. Undisclosed lead roles use the median of disclosed salaries for their era and budget band, capped at 15% of the film’s budget. Supporting and early-career roles use the documented pre-stardom fraction of that median. Undocumented backend, endorsements, and hyphenate credits enter as estimated lines from disclosed medians. Apply the rates year by year as shown above and you will land on $310.9 Million.
Méthodologie
We rebuild Akshay’s career as a yearly time series. Disclosed salaries and documented backend enter as reported, with citations. Undisclosed lead roles get the median of disclosed salaries for their era and budget band, capped at 15% of the film’s budget. Supporting roles and roles from before the breakthrough get 2.5% of that median, the going-rate ratio measured from disclosed pre-stardom deals. Films with no reported budget are treated as small productions, and every role is estimated unless a source documents it was unpaid. Representation fees come out at sourced rates, taxes follow the eras actually lived through, spending follows measured household savings behavior unless court documents say otherwise, and what remains compounds at real market returns. Undocumented backend enters as an expected value from disclosed deals, endorsements at the median disclosed ambassador fee, and producer or director credits at union-scale floors.
Le modèle complet, chaque tableau de taux et la façon dont nos estimations ont été comparées aux offres réelles sont disponibles. page méthodologie.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is Akshay Kumar's net worth in 2026?
As of 2026, Akshay Kumar's net worth is an estimated $310.9 Million. The estimate is built film by film from disclosed salaries and documented backend, then year by year: income, minus representation fees and taxes, minus spending, compounded at real market returns.
How does Akshay Kumar make money?
Salaires des films et participation backend documentée.
How is Akshay Kumar's net worth calculated?
Disclosed paydays enter as reported, with citations. Undisclosed lead roles use the median of disclosed salaries for their era and budget band, capped at 15% of the film's budget, and supporting or early-career roles use the documented pre-stardom fraction of that median. We subtract sourced representation fees, taxes for the years Akshay actually worked, and spending from measured savings behavior, then compound at real market returns. Undocumented backend, endorsements, and producing credits enter as estimated lines from disclosed medians. Every rate and source is published.
How much does Akshay Kumar make per film?
Cela varie selon le rôle et l'époque, et le tableau film par film ci-dessus répertorie les rémunérations comptabilisées pour chaque titre. Les jours de paie divulgués entrent tels que déclarés. Les rôles non divulgués sont calqués sur ce que des acteurs comparables ont gagné à la même époque et dans la même fourchette budgétaire, les rôles principaux après la percée gagnant le plus et les rôles de soutien ou les premiers rôles une fraction documentée de ce montant.
Pourquoi le taux d'imposition est-il si élevé et les acteurs ne l'évitent-ils pas en faisant appel à une société de prêt ?
Tax comes out at the effective rate for where Akshay lived each year, which is the rate shown in the year-by-year table. In a high-tax state like California, combined federal and state income tax reaches close to half of a top earner's income, so those years run in the mid-40s percent. A loan-out company, the corporation many actors run their income through, does not lower the tax on the money they take home. Its real advantage is deducting business costs such as agent, manager, and attorney fees, and the model already subtracts those as a separate line before any tax is applied. High-earning performers also fall outside the pass-through business deduction that other company owners can claim, so it buys them no rate cut.
Pourquoi ce chiffre est-il différent de celui des autres sites à valeur nette ?
Most sites publish a single number with no way to check it. This estimate is built in the open: every salary, rate, and assumption is on the page, and the page méthodologie lists every source.
Quelle est la précision de cette estimation ?
Aucune estimation de la valeur nette d’un particulier n’est exacte ; celui-ci est un modèle construit à partir de données publiques. La différence est que vous pouvez voir comment il a été construit et vérifier chaque étape. Le niveau de confiance situé en haut du calcul indique dans quelle mesure le chiffre repose sur des chiffres divulgués, et la page indique où un chiffre s'appuie sur une hypothèse.
Is Akshay Kumar rich compared to the average person?
Yes. A net worth of $310.9 Million is far above the median American household, which sits near $193,000 according to Federal Reserve data.
What is Akshay Kumar's biggest source of wealth?
On this page it is film salaries, the largest line in the calculation at $480.3 Million. The full breakdown, with every other line and its source, is above.
How much does Akshay Kumar make from endorsements?
The model counts $48.0 Million in career endorsement income for Akshay: 3 named partnerships x the $4.0M annual fee from the median disclosed film deal x a 4-year term, spread across the deal years. It is an estimate, since the individual deal values are not all public, and it sits as its own line in the calculation above.
Explorez d'autres acteurs
Akshay Kumar
Angelina Jolie
Bruce Willis
Christian Bale
Emma Watson
Hugh Jackman
Jason Statham
Jennifer Aniston
Jennifer Garner
Jodie Foster
Johnny Depp
Julia Roberts
Leonardo DiCaprio
Margot Robbie
Matt Damon
Mila Kunis
Morgan Freeman
Natalie Portman
Samuel L. Jackson
Sandra Bullock
Scarlett Johansson
Sylvester Stallone
Tom Hanks
À propos de NetWorth Explained
We originally created NWE because nobody in the public-figure net worth space showed their work. Magazines and sites threw out big numbers while hiding behind vague claims of “proprietary algorithms” ou “insider knowledge.” That’s why we started the world’s only publication that transparently showed every assumption, every variable, and every calculation. We’re still the only ones who do it this way. En savoir plus sur NetWorth Explained.