Al Pacino Patrimoine net 2026
Dernière mise à jour August 3, 2026
As of 2026, Al Pacino has an estimated net worth of $416.0 Million, computed film by film and year by year from public records and published rates. Every input, rate, and source behind the number is on this page.
Calculation
- Salaires divulgués et backend documenté, chacun avec une citation
- Rôles non divulgués modélisés à partir de comparables divulgués pour leur époque, leur tranche budgétaire et leur étape de carrière
- Backend, avenants et crédits de production estimés à partir des médianes divulguées
Fast Facts
| Birthdate | April 25, 1940 |
|---|---|
| Birthplace | Manhattan |
| Breakthrough | The Basic Training of Pavlo Hummel (1972) |
| Best Known | The Godfather (1972) |
Who Is Al Pacino?
Al Pacino was born April 25, 1940 in Manhattan, best known for The Godfather (1972). The earnings behind Al's net worth come from film salaries, backend participation, and endorsement deals.
The model tracks Al's earning years from 1966 to 2026, with the biggest single year in 2025 at about $39.9 Million of gross income. After representation fees, taxes, and living costs, what stays invested compounds at market returns into an estimated $416.0 Million today.
Data
Chaque ligne ci-dessous est calculée à partir des données publiques et des tableaux de tarifs publiés sur notre page méthodologie. Confiance: Catégorie C. Les chiffres documentés ne couvrent qu’une petite partie de ce chiffre, de sorte que la majeure partie est modélisée à partir de taux publiés et de comparables (les notes vont de A, principalement documentées, à C, principalement modélisées).
The Calculation
| Line | Amount |
|---|---|
| Revenue | |
| Film pay, modeled lead roles (96 of 111 films) era and budget-band medians of disclosed lead salaries (winsorized, thin cells shrunk toward the era median), blended with this actor's disclosed quote history when available; soft breakthrough blend near the career break year | $501,799,487 |
| Film pay, modeled post-breakthrough supporting roles (6 of 111 films) 12.0% of lead cells: lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio | $8,729,999 |
| Film pay, modeled supporting and early roles (9 of 111 films) 2,5% des médianes de l'époque : le taux de pré-célébrité | $2,194,678 |
| Points back-end, estimés 12% of disclosed lead deals included points, at a median 2.6% of box office; expected value on 76 commercially viable undisclosed lead roles; cash spread over 3 years; 47 film(s) used band-specific box-office/budget multiples as a gross proxy | $18,312,158 |
| Approbations, estimées (1 partenariat de marque) 1 named partnerships x the $4.0M annual fee from the median disclosed film deal x a 4-year term, spread across the deal years | $16,000,000 |
| Résidus, estimés SAG residual rates on post-theatrical receipts assumed at half of box office, split by role share and spread over the ten years after each release; 58 film(s) used band-specific box-office proxies | $37,749,754 |
| TV: N.Y.P.D. John James; guest default per credited year; broadcast network family; priced from tv_episode_rates.csv (en.wikipedia.org) | $150,000 |
| TV: Angels in America Roy Cohn; stated episode count; cable network family; priced from tv_episode_rates.csv (en.wikipedia.org) | $450,000 |
| TV: You Don't Know Jack Dr. Jack Kevorkian; one engagement for a television film or special; animation format tier; priced from tv_episode_rates.csv (en.wikipedia.org) | $35,000 |
| TV: Phil Spector Phil Spector; one engagement for a television film or special; network not identified, priced on the broadcast cell; priced from tv_episode_rates.csv (en.wikipedia.org) | $75,000 |
| TV: Paterno Joe Paterno; one engagement for a television film or special; network not identified, priced on the broadcast cell; priced from tv_episode_rates.csv (en.wikipedia.org) | $75,000 |
| TV: Hunters Meyer Offerman; stated episode count; network not identified, priced on the broadcast cell; priced from tv_episode_rates.csv (en.wikipedia.org) | $1,350,000 |
| Retour sur investissement de l'épargne mixed portfolio: 55% actual 60/40 securities returns (taxed) + 45% US long-run home-price rate on the rest | $294,853,091 |
| Expenses | |
| Frais de représentation agent 10% + avocat 5% | -$86,705,134 |
| Taxes Taux effectifs US-CA, année par année | -$221,432,279 |
| Dépenses personnelles measured household savings rates by income, times a 88% entertainment-household factor | -$148,799,727 |
| Valeur nette estimée | $415,950,180 |
Film par film
| Film | Year | Role | Budget | Billetterie | Salaire compté |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Father Joe no disclosed fee: modeled on the $23.8M shrunk median for 2020s/large (n=2), capped at $10.5M | 2026 | Lead | $70,000,000 | – | $10,500,000 |
| Killing Castro no disclosed fee: modeled on the $23.8M shrunk median for 2020s/large (n=2), capped at $10.5M | 2026 | Lead | $70,000,000 | – | $10,500,000 |
| Lear Rex no disclosed fee: modeled on the $23.8M shrunk median for 2020s/large (n=2), capped at $10.5M | 2026 | Lead | $70,000,000 | – | $10,500,000 |
| Maserati: The Brothers no disclosed fee: modeled on the $23.8M shrunk median for 2020s/large (n=2), capped at $10.5M | 2026 | Lead | $70,000,000 | – | $10,500,000 |
| Billy Knight no disclosed fee: modeled on the $23.8M shrunk median for 2020s/large (n=2), capped at $10.5M | 2025 | Lead | $70,000,000 | – | $10,500,000 |
| Dead Man's Wire no disclosed fee: modeled on the $25.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid), capped at $2.2M | 2025 | Lead | $15,000,000 | $2,500,000 | $2,250,000 |
| Easy's Waltz no disclosed fee: modeled on the $23.8M shrunk median for 2020s/large (n=2), capped at $10.5M | 2025 | Lead | $70,000,000 | – | $10,500,000 |
| In the Hand of Dante no disclosed fee: modeled on the $21.7M shrunk median for 2020s/mid (n=1), capped at $3.8M | 2025 | Lead | $25,000,000 | – | $3,750,000 |
| The Ritual (2025 film) no disclosed fee: modeled on the $23.8M shrunk median for 2020s/large (n=2), capped at $10.5M | 2025 | Lead | $70,000,000 | $5,700,000 | $10,500,000 |
| Modì, Three Days on the Wing of Madness no disclosed fee: modeled on the $23.8M shrunk median for 2020s/large (n=2), capped at $10.5M | 2024 | Lead | $70,000,000 | $492,740 | $10,500,000 |
| Knox Goes Away no disclosed fee: modeled on the $23.8M shrunk median for 2020s/large (n=2), capped at $10.5M | 2023 | Lead | $70,000,000 | $451,530 | $10,500,000 |
| American Traitor: The Trial of Axis Sally no disclosed fee: modeled on the $23.8M shrunk median for 2020s/large (n=2), capped at $10.5M | 2021 | Lead | $70,000,000 | – | $10,500,000 |
| House of Gucci no disclosed fee: modeled on the $23.8M shrunk median for 2020s/large (n=2), capped at $11.2M | 2021 | Lead | $75,000,000 | $153,300,000 | $11,250,000 |
| Once Upon a Time in Hollywood no disclosed fee: modeled on the $20.0M shrunk median for 2010s/large (n=8), capped at $13.9M | 2019 | Lead | $93,000,000 | $374,343,626 | $13,950,000 |
| The Irishman no disclosed fee: modeled on the $15.8M shrunk median for 2010s/blockbuster (n=11) | 2019 | Lead | $204,500,000 | $8,000,000 | $15,769,231 |
| Hunters no disclosed fee: modeled on the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3), capped at $6.0M | 2018 | Lead | $40,000,000 | – | $6,000,000 |
| Paterno no disclosed fee: modeled on the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3), capped at $6.0M | 2018 | Lead | $40,000,000 | – | $6,000,000 |
| Frank Serpico no disclosed fee: modeled on the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3), capped at $6.0M | 2017 | Lead | $40,000,000 | – | $6,000,000 |
| Hangman no disclosed fee: modeled on the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3), capped at $6.0M | 2017 | Lead | $40,000,000 | $104,503 | $6,000,000 |
| Julian Schnabel: A Private Portrait no disclosed fee: modeled on the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3), capped at $6.0M | 2017 | Lead | $40,000,000 | – | $6,000,000 |
| Tennessee Williams no disclosed fee: modeled on the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3), capped at $6.0M | 2017 | Lead | $40,000,000 | – | $6,000,000 |
| The Pirates of Somalia (film) no disclosed fee: modeled on the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3), capped at $6.0M | 2017 | Lead | $40,000,000 | – | $6,000,000 |
| Misconduct no disclosed fee: modeled on the $5.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid), capped at $1.6M | 2016 | Lead | $11,000,000 | $2,100,000 | $1,650,000 |
| Danny Collins no disclosed fee: modeled on the $5.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid), capped at $1.5M | 2015 | Lead | $10,000,000 | $10,800,000 | $1,500,000 |
| Manglehorn no disclosed fee: modeled on the $5.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid), capped at $0.6M | 2014 | Lead | $4,000,000 | $459,636 | $600,000 |
| The Humbling (film) no disclosed fee: modeled on the $5.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid), capped at $0.3M | 2014 | Lead | $2,000,000 | $400,000 | $300,000 |
| Phil Spector no disclosed fee: modeled on the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3), capped at $6.0M | 2013 | Lead | $40,000,000 | – | $6,000,000 |
| Salomé no disclosed fee: modeled on the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3), capped at $6.0M | 2013 | Lead | $40,000,000 | – | $6,000,000 |
| Casting By no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio) | 2012 | Supporting | $40,000,000 | – | $1,320,000 |
| Stand Up Guys no disclosed fee: modeled on the $5.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid), capped at $2.2M | 2012 | Lead | $15,000,000 | $5,100,000 | $2,250,000 |
| Jack and Jill no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $20.0M shrunk median for 2010s/large (n=8) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio) | 2011 | Supporting | $79,000,000 | $149,000,000 | $2,400,000 |
| The Son of No One no disclosed fee: modeled on the $5.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid), capped at $2.2M | 2011 | Lead | $15,000,000 | $1,100,000 | $2,250,000 |
| Wilde Salomé no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio) | 2011 | Supporting | $40,000,000 | – | $1,320,000 |
| You Don't Know Jack no disclosed fee: modeled on the $5.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid), capped at $2.7M | 2010 | Lead | $18,000,000 | – | $2,700,000 |
| I Knew It Was You no disclosed fee: modeled on the $19.4M shrunk median for 2000s/mid (n=2), capped at $6.0M | 2009 | Lead | $40,000,000 | – | $6,000,000 |
| Righteous Kill no disclosed fee: modeled on the $20.0M shrunk median for 2000s/large (n=18), capped at $9.0M | 2008 | Lead | $60,000,000 | $79,400,000 | $9,000,000 |
| 88 Minutes no disclosed fee: modeled on the $19.4M shrunk median for 2000s/mid (n=2), capped at $4.5M | 2007 | Lead | $30,000,000 | $32,600,000 | $4,500,000 |
| Brando no disclosed fee: modeled on the $19.4M shrunk median for 2000s/mid (n=2), capped at $6.0M | 2007 | Lead | $40,000,000 | – | $6,000,000 |
| Ocean's Thirteen no disclosed fee: modeled on the $20.0M shrunk median for 2000s/large (n=18), capped at $12.8M | 2007 | Lead | $85,000,000 | $311,312,624 | $12,750,000 |
| China Doll no disclosed fee: modeled on the $19.4M shrunk median for 2000s/mid (n=2), capped at $6.0M | 2006 | Lead | $40,000,000 | – | $6,000,000 |
| Glengarry Glen Ross no disclosed fee: modeled on the $19.4M shrunk median for 2000s/mid (n=2), capped at $6.0M | 2006 | Lead | $40,000,000 | – | $6,000,000 |
| Salome no disclosed fee: modeled on the $19.4M shrunk median for 2000s/mid (n=2), capped at $6.0M | 2006 | Lead | $40,000,000 | – | $6,000,000 |
| Scarface: The World is Yours no disclosed fee: modeled on the $19.4M shrunk median for 2000s/mid (n=2), capped at $6.0M | 2006 | Lead | $40,000,000 | – | $6,000,000 |
| The Merchant of Venice no disclosed fee: modeled on the $19.4M shrunk median for 2000s/mid (n=2), capped at $6.0M | 2006 | Lead | $40,000,000 | – | $6,000,000 |
| Orphans no disclosed fee: modeled on the $19.4M shrunk median for 2000s/mid (n=2), capped at $6.0M | 2005 | Lead | $40,000,000 | – | $6,000,000 |
| Two for the Money no disclosed fee: modeled on the $19.4M shrunk median for 2000s/mid (n=2), capped at $4.1M | 2005 | Lead | $27,500,000 | $30,500,000 | $4,125,000 |
| The Merchant of Venice (2004 film) no disclosed fee: modeled on the $19.4M shrunk median for 2000s/mid (n=2), capped at $4.5M | 2004 | Lead | $30,000,000 | $21,417,725 | $4,500,000 |
| Angels in America no disclosed fee: modeled on the $19.4M shrunk median for 2000s/mid (n=2), capped at $6.0M | 2003 | Lead | $40,000,000 | – | $6,000,000 |
| Gigli no disclosed fee: modeled on the $20.0M shrunk median for 2000s/large (n=18), capped at $11.3M | 2003 | Lead | $75,600,000 | $7,300,000 | $11,340,000 |
| Salome no disclosed fee: modeled on the $19.4M shrunk median for 2000s/mid (n=2), capped at $6.0M | 2003 | Lead | $40,000,000 | – | $6,000,000 |
| The Recruit (film) no disclosed fee: modeled on the $19.4M shrunk median for 2000s/mid (n=2), capped at $6.9M | 2003 | Lead | $46,000,000 | $101,200,000 | $6,900,000 |
| Insomnia no disclosed fee: modeled on the $19.4M shrunk median for 2000s/mid (n=2), capped at $6.9M | 2002 | Lead | $46,000,000 | $113,800,000 | $6,900,000 |
| People I Know no disclosed fee: modeled on the $19.4M shrunk median for 2000s/mid (n=2), capped at $6.0M | 2002 | Lead | $40,000,000 | $5,484,302 | $6,000,000 |
| Simone no disclosed fee: modeled on the $18.8M median for its era and nearest band (mid), capped at $1.5M | 2002 | Lead | $10,000,000 | $19,600,000 | $1,500,000 |
| The Resistible Rise of Arturo Ui no disclosed fee: modeled on the $19.4M shrunk median for 2000s/mid (n=2), capped at $6.0M | 2002 | Lead | $40,000,000 | – | $6,000,000 |
| Chinese Coffee no disclosed fee: modeled on the $19.4M shrunk median for 2000s/mid (n=2), capped at $6.0M | 2000 | Lead | $40,000,000 | – | $6,000,000 |
| AirPlay no disclosed fee: modeled on the $14.4M shrunk median for 1990s/mid (n=6), capped at $3.9M | 1999 | Lead | $26,000,000 | – | $3,900,000 |
| Any Given Sunday no disclosed fee: modeled on the $14.6M shrunk median for 1990s/large (n=3), capped at $8.2M | 1999 | Lead | $55,000,000 | $100,200,000 | $8,250,000 |
| Mark Taper Forum no disclosed fee: modeled on the $14.4M shrunk median for 1990s/mid (n=6), capped at $3.9M | 1999 | Lead | $26,000,000 | – | $3,900,000 |
| The Insider (film) no disclosed fee: modeled on the $14.6M shrunk median for 1990s/large (n=3), capped at $11.8M | 1999 | Lead | $79,000,000 | $60,300,000 | $11,850,000 |
| Donnie Brasco no disclosed fee: modeled on the $14.4M shrunk median for 1990s/mid (n=6), capped at $5.2M | 1997 | Lead | $35,000,000 | $124,900,000 | $5,250,000 |
| Pitch no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $14.4M shrunk median for 1990s/mid (n=6) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio) | 1997 | Supporting | $26,000,000 | – | $1,725,000 |
| The Devil's Advocate (1997 film) no disclosed fee: modeled on the $14.6M shrunk median for 1990s/large (n=3), capped at $8.6M | 1997 | Lead | $57,000,000 | $153,000,000 | $8,550,000 |
| Circle in the Square Theatre, Broadway no disclosed fee: modeled on the $14.4M shrunk median for 1990s/mid (n=6), capped at $3.9M | 1996 | Lead | $26,000,000 | – | $3,900,000 |
| City Hall no disclosed fee: modeled on the $14.4M shrunk median for 1990s/mid (n=6), capped at $6.0M | 1996 | Lead | $40,000,000 | $33,400,000 | $5,999,999 |
| Hughie no disclosed fee: modeled on the $14.4M shrunk median for 1990s/mid (n=6), capped at $3.9M | 1996 | Lead | $26,000,000 | – | $3,900,000 |
| Looking for Richard no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $14.4M shrunk median for 1990s/mid (n=6) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio) | 1996 | Supporting | $26,000,000 | $1,408,575 | $1,725,000 |
| Heat no disclosed fee: modeled on the $14.6M shrunk median for 1990s/large (n=3), capped at $9.0M | 1995 | Lead | $60,000,000 | $187,400,000 | $8,999,998 |
| Two Bits no disclosed fee: modeled on the $14.4M shrunk median for 1990s/mid (n=6), capped at $3.9M | 1995 | Lead | $26,000,000 | $26,282 | $3,899,999 |
| Carlito's Way no disclosed fee: modeled on the $14.4M shrunk median for 1990s/mid (n=6), capped at $4.5M | 1993 | Lead | $30,000,000 | $64,000,000 | $4,499,997 |
| Chinese Coffee no disclosed fee: modeled on the $14.4M shrunk median for 1990s/mid (n=6), capped at $3.9M | 1992 | Lead | $26,000,000 | – | $3,899,994 |
| Glengarry Glen Ross no disclosed fee: modeled on the $10.0M shrunk median for 1990s/small (n=1), capped at $1.9M | 1992 | Lead | $12,500,000 | $10,700,000 | $1,874,997 |
| Salome no disclosed fee: modeled on the $14.4M shrunk median for 1990s/mid (n=6), capped at $3.9M | 1992 | Lead | $26,000,000 | – | $3,899,994 |
| Scent of a Woman no disclosed fee: modeled on the $14.4M shrunk median for 1990s/mid (n=6), capped at $4.7M | 1992 | Lead | $31,000,000 | $134,100,000 | $4,649,993 |
| Frankie and Johnny no disclosed fee: modeled on the $14.4M shrunk median for 1990s/mid (n=6), capped at $4.3M | 1991 | Lead | $29,000,000 | $67,000,000 | $4,349,987 |
| Madonna: Truth or Dare no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $2.0M median for its era and nearest band (small) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio) | 1991 | Supporting | $4,500,000 | $29,000,000 | $239,999 |
| Dick Tracy no disclosed fee: modeled on the $14.4M shrunk median for 1990s/mid (n=6), capped at $6.9M | 1990 | Lead | $46,000,000 | $162,700,000 | $6,899,960 |
| The Godfather Part III no disclosed fee: modeled on the $14.6M shrunk median for 1990s/large (n=3), capped at $8.1M | 1990 | Lead | $54,000,000 | $136,900,000 | $8,099,952 |
| The Local Stigmatic no disclosed fee: modeled on the $14.4M shrunk median for 1990s/mid (n=6), capped at $3.9M | 1990 | Lead | $26,000,000 | – | $3,899,978 |
| Sea of Love no disclosed fee: modeled on the $4.1M shrunk median for pre1990/small (n=2), capped at $2.9M | 1989 | Lead | $19,000,000 | $110,900,000 | $2,849,967 |
| Julius Caesar no disclosed fee: modeled on the $4.1M shrunk median for pre1990/small (n=2), capped at $2.1M | 1988 | Lead | $14,000,000 | – | $2,099,953 |
| National Anthems no disclosed fee: modeled on the $4.1M shrunk median for pre1990/small (n=2), capped at $2.1M | 1988 | Lead | $14,000,000 | – | $2,099,953 |
| Revolution no disclosed fee: modeled on the $6.3M shrunk median for pre1990/mid (n=4), capped at $4.2M | 1985 | Lead | $28,000,000 | $358,574 | $4,199,304 |
| Duke of York's Theatre no disclosed fee: modeled on the $4.1M shrunk median for pre1990/small (n=2), capped at $2.1M | 1984 | Lead | $14,000,000 | – | $2,099,330 |
| Scarface no disclosed fee: modeled on the $6.3M shrunk median for pre1990/mid (n=4), capped at $4.5M | 1983 | Lead | $30,250,000 | $66,400,000 | $4,534,641 |
| Author! Author! no disclosed fee: modeled on the $4.1M shrunk median for pre1990/small (n=2), capped at $2.1M | 1982 | Lead | $14,000,000 | $13,100,000 | $2,097,462 |
| American Buffalo no disclosed fee: modeled on the $4.1M shrunk median for pre1990/small (n=2), capped at $2.1M | 1980 | Lead | $14,000,000 | – | $2,090,406 |
| Booth Theatre no disclosed fee: modeled on the $4.1M shrunk median for pre1990/small (n=2), capped at $2.1M | 1980 | Lead | $14,000,000 | – | $2,090,406 |
| Circle in the Square Theatre no disclosed fee: modeled on the $4.1M shrunk median for pre1990/small (n=2), capped at $2.1M | 1980 | Lead | $14,000,000 | – | $2,090,406 |
| Cruising no disclosed fee: modeled on the $4.1M shrunk median for pre1990/small (n=2), capped at $1.6M | 1980 | Lead | $11,000,000 | $17,300,000 | $1,642,568 |
| ...And Justice for All (film) no disclosed fee: modeled on the $2.8M median for its era and nearest band (small), capped at $0.6M | 1979 | Lead | $4,000,000 | $33,300,000 | $595,051 |
| Richard III no disclosed fee: modeled on the $2.8M median for its era and nearest band (small), capped at $0.5M | 1979 | Lead | $3,025,000 | – | $450,163 |
| Bobby Deerfield no disclosed fee: modeled on the $4.1M shrunk median for pre1990/small (n=2), capped at $1.0M | 1977 | Lead | $6,400,000 | $9,300,000 | $930,485 |
| The Basic Training of Pavlo Hummel no disclosed fee: modeled on the $2.8M median for its era and nearest band (small), capped at $0.5M | 1977 | Lead | $3,025,000 | – | $440,489 |
| Dog Day Afternoon no disclosed fee: modeled on the $2.8M median for its era and nearest band (small), capped at $0.6M | 1975 | Lead | $3,800,000 | $53,000,000 | $510,250 |
| The Resistible Rise of Arturo Ui no disclosed fee: modeled on the $2.8M median for its era and nearest band (small), capped at $0.5M | 1975 | Lead | $3,025,000 | – | $407,857 |
| The Godfather Part II soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.79): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $4.1M shrunk median for pre1990/small (n=2), capped at $1.9M vs early terms | 1974 | Lead | $13,000,000 | $93,000,000 | $1,564,726 |
| Richard III soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.66): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $2.8M median for its era and nearest band (small), capped at $0.5M vs early terms | 1973 | Lead | $3,025,000 | – | $323,141 |
| Scarecrow soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.66): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $2.8M median for its era and nearest band (small), capped at $0.5M vs early terms | 1973 | Lead | $3,025,000 | $4,000,000 | $323,141 |
| Serpico soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.66): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $2.8M median for its era and nearest band (small), capped at $0.5M vs early terms | 1973 | Lead | $3,300,000 | $29,800,000 | $350,397 |
| The Basic Training of Pavlo Hummel soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.50): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $2.8M median for its era and nearest band (small), capped at $0.5M vs early terms | 1972 | Lead | $3,025,000 | – | $261,250 |
| The Godfather soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.50): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $4.1M shrunk median for pre1990/small (n=2), capped at $1.0M vs early terms | 1972 | Lead | $6,500,000 | $270,500,000 | $539,062 |
| The Panic in Needle Park soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.34): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $2.8M median for its era and nearest band (small), capped at $0.2M vs early terms | 1971 | Lead | $1,645,000 | – | $129,135 |
| Camino Real soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.21): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $2.8M median for its era and nearest band (small), capped at $0.5M vs early terms | 1970 | Lead | $3,025,000 | – | $149,064 |
| Does a Tiger Wear a Necktie? no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $4.1M shrunk median for pre1990/small (n=2) (pre-stardom rate); soft-breakthrough weight 0.12 | 1969 | Lead | $15,000,000 | – | $359,039 |
| Me, Natalie no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $4.1M shrunk median for pre1990/small (n=2) (pre-stardom rate); soft-breakthrough weight 0.12 | 1969 | Lead | $15,000,000 | $1,900,000 | $359,039 |
| The Local Stigmatic no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $4.1M shrunk median for pre1990/small (n=2) (pre-stardom rate); soft-breakthrough weight 0.12 | 1969 | Lead | $15,000,000 | – | $359,039 |
| N.Y.P.D. no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $4.1M shrunk median for pre1990/small (n=2) (pre-stardom rate); soft-breakthrough weight 0.06 | 1968 | Lead | $15,000,000 | – | $242,606 |
| The Indian Wants the Bronx no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $4.1M shrunk median for pre1990/small (n=2) (pre-stardom rate); soft-breakthrough weight 0.06 | 1968 | Lead | $15,000,000 | – | $242,606 |
| America, Hurrah no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $4.1M shrunk median for pre1990/small (n=2) (pre-stardom rate); soft-breakthrough weight 0.03 | 1967 | Lead | $15,000,000 | – | $177,075 |
| Awake and Sing! no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $4.1M shrunk median for pre1990/small (n=2) (pre-stardom rate); soft-breakthrough weight 0.03 | 1967 | Lead | $15,000,000 | – | $177,075 |
Comment fonctionnent les figures modélisées. An undisclosed lead role after the breakthrough gets the median of disclosed lead salaries for its era and budget band, capped at 15% of the film’s budget. Supporting and pre-breakthrough roles get 2.5% of that median, the documented going rate for actors before stardom. Films with no reported budget are treated as small productions. Undocumented backend, endorsements, and producer or director credits enter as separate estimated lines in the calculation above, built from disclosed medians. Every median comes from the published tables on our page méthodologie.
Patrimoine net Over Time
Solde modélisé à la fin de chaque année, correspondant au tableau année par année ci-dessous.
Année par année
| Year | Income | Frais de représentation | Taux d'imposition | Spent | Saved | Balance |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | $31,221,931 | $4,683,290 | 45% | $8,045,454 | $6,550,798 | $415,950,180 |
| 2025 | $39,862,579 | $5,979,387 | 45% | $10,272,029 | $8,363,727 | $401,273,592 |
| 2024 | $19,264,169 | $2,889,625 | 45% | $4,964,107 | $4,041,892 | $366,233,081 |
| 2023 | $11,892,957 | $1,783,943 | 45% | $3,064,648 | $2,495,309 | $335,373,546 |
| 2022 | $4,556,049 | $683,407 | 45% | $1,174,030 | $955,923 | $305,529,806 |
| 2021 | $16,865,928 | $2,529,889 | 45% | $4,346,113 | $3,538,708 | $326,843,355 |
| 2020 | $8,012,338 | $1,201,851 | 45% | $2,064,667 | $1,681,101 | $298,196,914 |
| 2019 | $22,053,089 | $3,307,963 | 45% | $5,682,772 | $4,627,047 | $276,007,362 |
| 2018 | $18,222,335 | $2,733,350 | 45% | $4,695,641 | $3,823,301 | $245,279,399 |
| 2017 | $25,379,592 | $3,806,939 | 47% | $6,302,149 | $5,131,358 | $240,054,182 |
| 2016 | $10,855,496 | $1,628,324 | 47% | $2,695,589 | $2,194,812 | $218,306,734 |
| 2015 | $2,441,403 | $366,210 | 47% | $606,238 | $493,614 | $205,434,661 |
| 2014 | $1,977,587 | $296,638 | 47% | $491,066 | $399,837 | $200,080,590 |
| 2013 | $9,707,036 | $1,456,055 | 47% | $2,410,409 | $1,962,611 | $188,189,879 |
| 2012 | $7,050,316 | $1,057,547 | 43% | $1,882,832 | $1,533,046 | $170,541,617 |
| 2011 | $6,240,491 | $936,074 | 43% | $1,666,563 | $1,356,955 | $158,428,702 |
| 2010 | $4,816,815 | $722,522 | 43% | $1,286,361 | $1,047,386 | $151,263,239 |
| 2009 | $6,620,029 | $993,004 | 43% | $1,767,921 | $1,439,483 | $140,611,228 |
| 2008 | $9,948,258 | $1,492,239 | 43% | $2,656,746 | $2,163,185 | $127,035,851 |
| 2007 | $20,770,499 | $3,115,575 | 43% | $5,546,895 | $4,516,412 | $137,267,963 |
| 2006 | $29,214,474 | $4,382,171 | 43% | $7,801,912 | $6,352,500 | $126,994,873 |
| 2005 | $17,267,961 | $2,590,194 | 43% | $4,611,519 | $3,754,808 | $113,120,828 |
| 2004 | $7,460,301 | $1,119,045 | 43% | $1,992,321 | $1,622,195 | $105,522,877 |
| 2003 | $24,131,350 | $3,619,703 | 43% | $6,444,431 | $5,247,208 | $98,547,344 |
| 2002 | $24,356,643 | $3,653,496 | 46% | $6,162,250 | $5,017,449 | $84,972,318 |
| 2001 | $7,156,124 | $1,073,419 | 46% | $1,810,505 | $1,474,156 | $82,438,749 |
| 2000 | $5,399,558 | $809,934 | 46% | $1,366,092 | $1,112,305 | $80,999,423 |
| 1999 | $22,658,524 | $3,398,779 | 46% | $5,732,625 | $4,667,638 | $78,644,922 |
| 1998 | $9,615,279 | $1,442,292 | 46% | $2,432,673 | $1,980,740 | $69,073,901 |
| 1997 | $12,132,502 | $1,819,875 | 46% | $3,069,533 | $2,499,286 | $60,700,901 |
| 1996 | $16,432,260 | $2,464,839 | 46% | $4,157,375 | $3,385,032 | $52,023,557 |
| 1995 | $14,456,233 | $2,168,435 | 46% | $3,657,438 | $2,977,972 | $45,082,194 |
| 1994 | $4,686,597 | $702,990 | 46% | $1,185,713 | $965,435 | $37,079,275 |
| 1993 | $4,036,429 | $605,464 | 46% | $1,021,220 | $831,501 | $35,469,710 |
| 1992 | $12,418,650 | $1,862,797 | 36% | $3,723,767 | $3,031,979 | $32,722,085 |
| 1991 | $8,391,236 | $1,258,685 | 36% | $2,516,136 | $2,048,697 | $28,296,760 |
| 1990 | $15,285,949 | $2,292,892 | 36% | $4,583,535 | $3,732,022 | $23,535,207 |
| 1989 | $7,947,456 | $1,192,118 | 36% | $2,383,067 | $1,940,349 | $19,284,960 |
| 1988 | $3,945,147 | $591,772 | 36% | $1,182,963 | $963,197 | $15,543,918 |
| 1987 | $1,384,804 | $207,721 | 45% | $356,844 | $290,551 | $13,617,145 |
| 1986 | $141,213 | $21,182 | 55% | $42,606 | $11,408 | $12,855,907 |
| 1985 | $3,181,636 | $477,245 | 55% | $670,797 | $546,179 | $11,817,624 |
| 1984 | $3,017,158 | $452,574 | 55% | $636,119 | $517,943 | $9,996,067 |
| 1983 | $4,057,985 | $608,698 | 55% | $855,561 | $696,618 | $8,958,046 |
| 1982 | $3,236,307 | $485,446 | 55% | $682,324 | $555,564 | $8,097,455 |
| 1981 | $1,075,109 | $161,266 | 55% | $226,670 | $184,560 | $7,392,199 |
| 1980 | $5,948,500 | $892,275 | 55% | $1,254,146 | $1,021,155 | $7,064,581 |
| 1979 | $3,460,423 | $519,063 | 55% | $729,575 | $594,037 | $5,923,476 |
| 1978 | $651,449 | $97,717 | 55% | $137,348 | $111,832 | $5,223,660 |
| 1977 | $1,367,905 | $205,186 | 55% | $288,401 | $234,823 | $5,010,368 |
| 1976 | $901,799 | $135,270 | 55% | $190,130 | $154,808 | $4,680,760 |
| 1975 | $5,137,538 | $770,631 | 55% | $1,083,168 | $881,941 | $4,436,120 |
| 1974 | $6,032,431 | $904,865 | 55% | $1,271,842 | $1,035,563 | $3,483,636 |
| 1973 | $5,711,906 | $856,786 | 55% | $1,204,264 | $980,540 | $2,399,483 |
| 1972 | $5,203,826 | $780,574 | 55% | $1,097,143 | $893,320 | $1,390,780 |
| 1971 | $394,729 | $59,209 | 55% | $83,222 | $67,762 | $487,586 |
| 1970 | $205,479 | $30,822 | 54% | $54,183 | $26,159 | $411,492 |
| 1969 | $839,544 | $125,932 | 54% | $180,938 | $147,324 | $377,684 |
| 1968 | $833,205 | $124,981 | 54% | $179,572 | $146,211 | $225,788 |
| 1967 | $393,468 | $59,020 | 54% | $84,800 | $69,046 | $77,997 |
| 1966 | $106,245 | $15,937 | 54% | $32,768 | $8,774 | $8,774 |
Model Notes
- PROCURATION DE RÉSIDENCE : résidence non recherchée individuellement pour ce lot ; US-CA par défaut appliqué jusqu'à ce que documenté
- salary comps: 2 disclosed lead fee(s) flagged as non-market outliers (scale / far-below-quote) and excluded from era medians
- Crédit image : Wikimedia Commons via Wikipedia (Al Pacino)
Méthodologie
We rebuild Al’s career as a yearly time series. Disclosed salaries and documented backend enter as reported, with citations. Undisclosed lead roles get the median of disclosed salaries for their era and budget band, capped at 15% of the film’s budget. Supporting roles and roles from before the breakthrough get 2.5% of that median, the going-rate ratio measured from disclosed pre-stardom deals. Films with no reported budget are treated as small productions, and every role is estimated unless a source documents it was unpaid. Representation fees come out at sourced rates, taxes follow the eras actually lived through, spending follows measured household savings behavior unless court documents say otherwise, and what remains compounds at real market returns. Undocumented backend enters as an expected value from disclosed deals, endorsements at the median disclosed ambassador fee, and producer or director credits at union-scale floors.
Le modèle complet, chaque tableau de taux et la façon dont nos estimations ont été comparées aux offres réelles sont disponibles. page méthodologie.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is Al Pacino's net worth in 2026?
As of 2026, Al Pacino's net worth is an estimated $416.0 Million. The estimate is built film by film from disclosed salaries and documented backend, then year by year: income, minus representation fees and taxes, minus spending, compounded at real market returns.
How does Al Pacino make money?
Salaires des films et participation backend documentée.
How is Al Pacino's net worth calculated?
Disclosed paydays enter as reported, with citations. Undisclosed lead roles use the median of disclosed salaries for their era and budget band, capped at 15% of the film's budget, and supporting or early-career roles use the documented pre-stardom fraction of that median. We subtract sourced representation fees, taxes for the years Al actually worked, and spending from measured savings behavior, then compound at real market returns. Undocumented backend, endorsements, and producing credits enter as estimated lines from disclosed medians. Every rate and source is published.
How much does Al Pacino make per film?
Cela varie selon le rôle et l'époque, et le tableau film par film ci-dessus répertorie les rémunérations comptabilisées pour chaque titre. Les jours de paie divulgués entrent tels que déclarés. Les rôles non divulgués sont calqués sur ce que des acteurs comparables ont gagné à la même époque et dans la même fourchette budgétaire, les rôles principaux après la percée gagnant le plus et les rôles de soutien ou les premiers rôles une fraction documentée de ce montant.
Pourquoi le taux d'imposition est-il si élevé et les acteurs ne l'évitent-ils pas en faisant appel à une société de prêt ?
Tax comes out at the effective rate for where Al lived each year, which is the rate shown in the year-by-year table. In a high-tax state like California, combined federal and state income tax reaches close to half of a top earner's income, so those years run in the mid-40s percent. A loan-out company, the corporation many actors run their income through, does not lower the tax on the money they take home. Its real advantage is deducting business costs such as agent, manager, and attorney fees, and the model already subtracts those as a separate line before any tax is applied. High-earning performers also fall outside the pass-through business deduction that other company owners can claim, so it buys them no rate cut.
Pourquoi ce chiffre est-il différent de celui des autres sites à valeur nette ?
Most sites publish a single number with no way to check it. This estimate is built in the open: every salary, rate, and assumption is on the page, and the page méthodologie lists every source.
Quelle est la précision de cette estimation ?
Aucune estimation de la valeur nette d’un particulier n’est exacte ; celui-ci est un modèle construit à partir de données publiques. La différence est que vous pouvez voir comment il a été construit et vérifier chaque étape. Le niveau de confiance situé en haut du calcul indique dans quelle mesure le chiffre repose sur des chiffres divulgués, et la page indique où un chiffre s'appuie sur une hypothèse.
Is Al Pacino rich compared to the average person?
Yes. A net worth of $416.0 Million is far above the median American household, which sits near $193,000 according to Federal Reserve data.
What is Al Pacino's biggest source of wealth?
On this page it is film salaries, the largest line in the calculation at $501.8 Million. The full breakdown, with every other line and its source, is above.
How much does Al Pacino make from endorsements?
The model counts $16.0 Million in career endorsement income for Al: 1 named partnerships x the $4.0M annual fee from the median disclosed film deal x a 4-year term, spread across the deal years. It is an estimate, since the individual deal values are not all public, and it sits as its own line in the calculation above.
Explorez d'autres acteurs
À propos de NetWorth Explained
We originally created NWE because nobody in the public-figure net worth space showed their work. Magazines and sites threw out big numbers while hiding behind vague claims of “proprietary algorithms” ou “insider knowledge.” That’s why we started the world’s only publication that transparently showed every assumption, every variable, and every calculation. We’re still the only ones who do it this way. En savoir plus sur NetWorth Explained.