Chris Pine Patrimoine net 2026
Dernière mise à jour August 3, 2026
As of 2026, Chris Pine has an estimated net worth of $168.3 Million, computed film by film and year by year from public records and published rates. Every input, rate, and source behind the number is on this page.
Calculation
- Salaires divulgués et backend documenté, chacun avec une citation
- Rôles non divulgués modélisés à partir de comparables divulgués pour leur époque, leur tranche budgétaire et leur étape de carrière
- Backend, avenants et crédits de production estimés à partir des médianes divulguées
Fast Facts
| Birthdate | August 26, 1980 |
|---|---|
| Birthplace | Los Angeles |
| Breakthrough | Star Trek (2009) |
| Best Known | Star Trek (2009) |
Who Is Chris Pine?
Chris Pine was born August 26, 1980 in Los Angeles, best known for Star Trek (2009). The earnings behind Chris's net worth come from film salaries, backend participation, and endorsement deals.
The model tracks Chris's earning years from 2002 to 2026, with the biggest single year in 2013 at about $42.8 Million of gross income. After representation fees, taxes, and living costs, what stays invested compounds at market returns into an estimated $168.3 Million today.
Data
Chaque ligne ci-dessous est calculée à partir des données publiques et des tableaux de tarifs publiés sur notre page méthodologie. Confiance: Catégorie C. Les chiffres documentés ne couvrent qu’une petite partie de ce chiffre, de sorte que la majeure partie est modélisée à partir de taux publiés et de comparables (les notes vont de A, principalement documentées, à C, principalement modélisées).
The Calculation
| Line | Amount |
|---|---|
| Revenue | |
| Film pay, modeled lead roles (41 of 68 films) era and budget-band medians of disclosed lead salaries (winsorized, thin cells shrunk toward the era median), blended with this actor's disclosed quote history when available; soft breakthrough blend near the career break year | $384,692,800 |
| Film pay, modeled post-breakthrough supporting roles (13 of 68 films) 12.0% of lead cells: lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio | $17,484,801 |
| Film pay, modeled supporting and early roles (14 of 68 films) 2,5% des médianes de l'époque : le taux de pré-célébrité | $11,940,636 |
| Points back-end, estimés 12% of disclosed lead deals included points, at a median 2.6% of box office; expected value on 32 commercially viable undisclosed lead roles; cash spread over 3 years; 18 film(s) used band-specific box-office/budget multiples as a gross proxy | $17,582,329 |
| Approbations, estimées (1 partenariat de marque) 1 named partnerships x the $4.0M annual fee from the median disclosed film deal x a 4-year term, spread across the deal years | $16,000,000 |
| Résidus, estimés SAG residual rates on post-theatrical receipts assumed at half of box office, split by role share and spread over the ten years after each release; 35 film(s) used band-specific box-office proxies | $42,435,318 |
| TV: ER Levine; guest default per credited year; broadcast network family; priced from tv_episode_rates.csv (en.wikipedia.org) | $30,000 |
| TV: The Guardian Lonnie Grandy; guest default per credited year; broadcast network family; priced from tv_episode_rates.csv (en.wikipedia.org) | $30,000 |
| TV: CSI: Miami Tommy Chandler; guest default per credited year; broadcast network family; priced from tv_episode_rates.csv (en.wikipedia.org) | $30,000 |
| TV: American Dreams Joey Tremain; guest default per credited year; broadcast network family; priced from tv_episode_rates.csv (en.wikipedia.org) | $30,000 |
| TV: Six Feet Under Young Sam Hoviak; guest default per credited year; cable network family; priced from tv_episode_rates.csv (en.wikipedia.org) | $30,000 |
| TV: Surrender, Dorothy Shawn Best; one engagement for a television film or special; network not identified, priced on the broadcast cell; priced from tv_episode_rates.csv (en.wikipedia.org) | $75,000 |
| TV: Saturday Night Live Himself / Host; stated episode count; variety format tier; priced from tv_episode_rates.csv (en.wikipedia.org) | $29,700 |
| TV: Robot Chicken Capt. Jake / Norman Bates / James T. Kirk; stated episode count; animation format tier; priced from tv_episode_rates.csv (en.wikipedia.org) | $36,120 |
| TV: Wet Hot American Summer: First Day of Camp Eric; stated episode count; streaming network family; priced from tv_episode_rates.csv (en.wikipedia.org) | $2,000,000 |
| TV: SuperMansion Dr. Devizo / Robo-Dino; stated episode count; network not identified, priced on the broadcast cell; priced from tv_episode_rates.csv (en.wikipedia.org) | $750,000 |
| TV: Angie Tribeca Dr. Thomas Hornbein; stated episode count; cable network family; priced from tv_episode_rates.csv (en.wikipedia.org) | $225,000 |
| TV: Breakthrough Narrator; guest default per credited year; network not identified, priced on the broadcast cell; priced from tv_episode_rates.csv (en.wikipedia.org) | $30,000 |
| TV: Wet Hot American Summer: Ten Years Later Eric; stated episode count; streaming network family; priced from tv_episode_rates.csv (en.wikipedia.org) | $1,600,000 |
| TV: I Am the Night Jay Singletary; stated episode count; cable network family; priced from tv_episode_rates.csv (en.wikipedia.org) | $2,100,000 |
| TV: American Dad! Alistair Covax; guest default per credited year; animation format tier; priced from tv_episode_rates.csv (en.wikipedia.org) | $24,000 |
| TV: Home Movie: The Princess Bride Westley; guest default per credited year; streaming network family; priced from tv_episode_rates.csv (en.wikipedia.org) | $30,000 |
| Retour sur investissement de l'épargne mixed portfolio: 55% actual 60/40 securities returns (taxed) + 45% US long-run home-price rate on the rest | $66,344,539 |
| Expenses | |
| Frais de représentation agent 10% + avocat 5% | -$73,424,738 |
| Taxes Taux effectifs US-CA, année par année | -$188,754,022 |
| Dépenses personnelles measured household savings rates by income, times a 88% entertainment-household factor | -$125,328,204 |
| Valeur nette estimée | $168,335,826 |
Film par film
| Film | Year | Role | Budget | Billetterie | Salaire compté |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alpha Gang no disclosed fee: modeled on the $23.8M shrunk median for 2020s/large (n=2), capped at $10.5M | 2026 | Lead | $70,000,000 | – | $10,499,881 |
| Carousel no disclosed fee: modeled on the $23.8M shrunk median for 2020s/large (n=2), capped at $10.5M | 2026 | Lead | $70,000,000 | $3,750,000 | $10,499,881 |
| TBA no disclosed fee: modeled on the $23.8M shrunk median for 2020s/large (n=2), capped at $10.5M | 2026 | Lead | $70,000,000 | – | $10,499,881 |
| The Kidnapping of Arabella no disclosed fee: modeled on the $23.8M shrunk median for 2020s/large (n=2), capped at $10.5M | 2025 | Lead | $70,000,000 | $86,452 | $10,499,769 |
| Ariana DeBose no disclosed fee: modeled on the $23.8M shrunk median for 2020s/large (n=2), capped at $10.5M | 2023 | Lead | $70,000,000 | – | $10,499,124 |
| Dungeons & Dragons: Honor Among Thieves no disclosed fee: modeled on the $16.4M shrunk median for 2020s/tentpole (n=5) | 2023 | Lead | $150,000,000 | $208,200,000 | $16,427,155 |
| Poolman no disclosed fee: modeled on the $23.8M shrunk median for 2020s/large (n=2), capped at $10.5M | 2023 | Lead | $70,000,000 | $153,325 | $10,499,124 |
| Wish no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $16.4M shrunk median for 2020s/tentpole (n=5) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio) | 2023 | Supporting | $187,500,000 | $255,000,000 | $1,971,291 |
| All the Old Knives no disclosed fee: modeled on the $23.8M shrunk median for 2020s/large (n=2), capped at $10.5M | 2022 | Lead | $70,000,000 | – | $10,498,294 |
| Don't Worry Darling no disclosed fee: modeled on the $21.7M shrunk median for 2020s/mid (n=1), capped at $3.0M | 2022 | Lead | $20,000,000 | $87,609,403 | $2,999,577 |
| Doula no disclosed fee: modeled on the $23.8M shrunk median for 2020s/large (n=2), capped at $10.5M | 2022 | Lead | $70,000,000 | – | $10,498,294 |
| The Contractor no disclosed fee: modeled on the $23.8M shrunk median for 2020s/large (n=2), capped at $10.5M | 2022 | Lead | $70,000,000 | $2,100,000 | $10,498,294 |
| Film à la maison : La princesse à marier no disclosed fee: modeled on the $23.8M shrunk median for 2020s/large (n=2), capped at $10.5M | 2020 | Lead | $70,000,000 | – | $10,493,532 |
| Wonder Woman 1984 no disclosed fee: modeled on the $18.0M shrunk median for 2020s/blockbuster (n=8) | 2020 | Lead | $200,000,000 | $169,600,000 | $17,988,540 |
| American Dad! no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio) | 2019 | Supporting | $40,000,000 | – | $1,318,672 |
| I Am the Night no disclosed fee: modeled on the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3), capped at $6.0M | 2019 | Lead | $40,000,000 | – | $5,992,723 |
| Love, Antosha no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio) | 2019 | Supporting | $40,000,000 | $50,168 | $1,318,672 |
| A Wrinkle in Time no disclosed fee: modeled on the $20.0M shrunk median for 2010s/tentpole (n=12), capped at $17.2M | 2018 | Lead | $115,000,000 | $133,000,000 | $17,208,584 |
| Outlaw King no disclosed fee: modeled on the $20.0M shrunk median for 2010s/tentpole (n=12), capped at $18.0M | 2018 | Lead | $120,000,000 | – | $17,956,729 |
| Spider-Man: Into the Spider-Verse no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $20.0M shrunk median for 2010s/large (n=8) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio) | 2018 | Supporting | $90,000,000 | $363,800,000 | $2,395,302 |
| Angie Tribeca no disclosed fee: modeled on the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3), capped at $6.0M | 2017 | Lead | $40,000,000 | – | $5,972,493 |
| Breakthrough no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio) | 2017 | Supporting | $40,000,000 | – | $1,314,979 |
| Wet Hot American Summer: Ten Years Later no disclosed fee: modeled on the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3), capped at $6.0M | 2017 | Lead | $40,000,000 | – | $5,972,493 |
| Wonder Woman no disclosed fee: modeled on the $20.0M shrunk median for 2010s/tentpole (n=12) | 2017 | Lead | $149,000,000 | $824,000,000 | $19,906,307 |
| Encore: Movie Partners Sing Broadway no disclosed fee: modeled on the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3), capped at $6.0M | 2016 | Lead | $40,000,000 | – | $5,946,666 |
| For the Love of Spock no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio) | 2016 | Supporting | $40,000,000 | – | $1,310,265 |
| Hell or High Water no disclosed fee: modeled on the $5.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid), capped at $1.8M | 2016 | Lead | $12,000,000 | $37,900,000 | $1,784,396 |
| Star Trek Beyond no disclosed fee: modeled on the $20.0M shrunk median for 2010s/tentpole (n=12) | 2016 | Lead | $185,000,000 | $343,471,816 | $19,818,339 |
| The Finest Hours no disclosed fee: modeled on the $20.0M shrunk median for 2010s/large (n=8), capped at $11.2M | 2016 | Lead | $75,000,000 | $52,100,000 | $11,149,853 |
| Figures of Speech no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio) | 2015 | Supporting | $40,000,000 | – | $1,301,204 |
| SuperMansion no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio) | 2015 | Supporting | $40,000,000 | – | $1,301,204 |
| Wet Hot American Summer: First Day of Camp no disclosed fee: modeled on the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3), capped at $6.0M | 2015 | Lead | $40,000,000 | – | $5,897,029 |
| Z for Zachariah no disclosed fee: modeled on the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3), capped at $6.0M | 2015 | Lead | $40,000,000 | $121,461 | $5,897,029 |
| Billy Magnussen no disclosed fee: modeled on the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3), capped at $6.0M | 2014 | Lead | $40,000,000 | – | $5,802,801 |
| Emily Blunt no disclosed fee: modeled on the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3), capped at $6.0M | 2014 | Lead | $40,000,000 | – | $5,802,801 |
| Horrible Bosses 2 no disclosed fee: modeled on the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3), capped at $6.3M | 2014 | Lead | $42,000,000 | $107,700,000 | $6,092,468 |
| Into the Woods no disclosed fee: modeled on the $20.0M shrunk median for 2010s/large (n=8), capped at $7.5M | 2014 | Lead | $50,000,000 | $212,900,000 | $7,258,884 |
| Jack Ryan: Shadow Recruit no disclosed fee: modeled on the $20.0M shrunk median for 2010s/large (n=8), capped at $9.0M | 2014 | Lead | $60,000,000 | $135,503,748 | $8,707,216 |
| Stretch no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $5.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio) | 2014 | Supporting | $5,000,000 | – | $583,639 |
| Queenie Eye no disclosed fee: modeled on the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3), capped at $6.0M | 2013 | Lead | $40,000,000 | – | $5,628,052 |
| Star Trek no disclosed fee: modeled on the $20.0M shrunk median for 2010s/tentpole (n=12) | 2013 | Lead | $187,500,000 | $467,400,000 | $18,733,101 |
| Star Trek Into Darkness no disclosed fee: modeled on the $20.0M shrunk median for 2010s/tentpole (n=12) | 2013 | Lead | $190,000,000 | $467,400,000 | $18,733,101 |
| Celeste and Jesse Forever no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $5.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio), capped at 15% of budget | 2012 | Supporting | $840,000 | $3,600,000 | $125,881 |
| People Like Us no disclosed fee: modeled on the $5.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid), capped at $2.4M | 2012 | Lead | $16,000,000 | $12,600,000 | $2,128,813 |
| Rise of the Guardians no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $20.0M shrunk median for 2010s/tentpole (n=12) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio) | 2012 | Supporting | $145,000,000 | $306,900,000 | $2,173,514 |
| The Ivy Walls no disclosed fee: modeled on the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3), capped at $6.0M | 2012 | Lead | $40,000,000 | – | $5,317,563 |
| This Means War no disclosed fee: modeled on the $20.0M shrunk median for 2010s/large (n=8), capped at $9.8M | 2012 | Lead | $65,000,000 | $156,500,000 | $8,647,373 |
| Quantum Quest: A Cassini Space Odyssey soft-breakthrough supporting blend (w=0.66) | 2010 | Supporting | $40,000,000 | – | $965,490 |
| The Lieutenant of Inishmore soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.66): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3), capped at $6.0M vs early terms | 2010 | Lead | $40,000,000 | – | $4,057,830 |
| Unstoppable soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.66): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $20.0M shrunk median for 2010s/large (n=8), capped at $13.9M vs early terms | 2010 | Lead | $92,500,000 | $167,800,000 | $9,337,616 |
| Beyond All Boundaries soft-breakthrough supporting blend (w=0.50) | 2009 | Supporting | $40,000,000 | – | $1,404,688 |
| Carriers soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.50): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $19.4M shrunk median for 2000s/mid (n=2), capped at $6.0M vs early terms | 2009 | Lead | $40,000,000 | $5,800,000 | $3,242,188 |
| Farragut North soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.50): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $19.4M shrunk median for 2000s/mid (n=2), capped at $6.0M vs early terms | 2009 | Lead | $40,000,000 | – | $3,242,188 |
| Star Trek soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.50): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $11.8M shrunk median for 2000s/tentpole (n=9) vs early terms | 2009 | Lead | $150,000,000 | $385,700,000 | $6,056,818 |
| Bottle Shock soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.34): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $18.8M median for its era and nearest band (mid), capped at $0.8M vs early terms | 2008 | Lead | $5,000,000 | $4,600,000 | $564,162 |
| Fat Pig soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.21): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $19.4M shrunk median for 2000s/mid (n=2), capped at $6.0M vs early terms | 2007 | Lead | $40,000,000 | – | $1,634,981 |
| Blind Dating no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $19.4M shrunk median for 2000s/mid (n=2) (pre-stardom rate); soft-breakthrough weight 0.12 | 2006 | Lead | $40,000,000 | $945,718 | $1,141,854 |
| Just My Luck no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $19.4M shrunk median for 2000s/mid (n=2) (pre-stardom rate); soft-breakthrough weight 0.12 | 2006 | Lead | $28,000,000 | $38,100,000 | $927,288 |
| Robot Chicken no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $19.4M shrunk median for 2000s/mid (n=2) (pre-stardom rate) | 2006 | Supporting | $40,000,000 | – | $703,783 |
| Smokin' Aces no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $18.8M median for its era and nearest band (mid) (pre-stardom rate); soft-breakthrough weight 0.12 | 2006 | Lead | $17,000,000 | $57,300,000 | $716,841 |
| Surrender, Dorothy no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $19.4M shrunk median for 2000s/mid (n=2) (pre-stardom rate); soft-breakthrough weight 0.12 | 2006 | Lead | $40,000,000 | – | $1,141,854 |
| The Atheist no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $19.4M shrunk median for 2000s/mid (n=2) (pre-stardom rate); soft-breakthrough weight 0.12 | 2006 | Lead | $40,000,000 | – | $1,141,854 |
| Six Feet Under no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $19.4M shrunk median for 2000s/mid (n=2) (pre-stardom rate); soft-breakthrough weight 0.06 | 2005 | Lead | $40,000,000 | – | $842,721 |
| American Dreams no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $19.4M shrunk median for 2000s/mid (n=2) (pre-stardom rate); soft-breakthrough weight 0.03 | 2004 | Lead | $40,000,000 | – | $674,362 |
| The Princess Diaries 2: Royal Engagement no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $19.4M shrunk median for 2000s/mid (n=2) (pre-stardom rate); soft-breakthrough weight 0.03 | 2004 | Lead | $45,000,000 | $135,300,000 | $700,196 |
| CSI: Miami no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $19.4M shrunk median for 2000s/mid (n=2) (pre-stardom rate); soft-breakthrough weight 0.02 | 2003 | Lead | $40,000,000 | – | $583,580 |
| ER no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $19.4M shrunk median for 2000s/mid (n=2) (pre-stardom rate); soft-breakthrough weight 0.02 | 2003 | Lead | $40,000,000 | – | $583,580 |
| The Guardian no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $19.4M shrunk median for 2000s/mid (n=2) (pre-stardom rate); soft-breakthrough weight 0.02 | 2003 | Lead | $40,000,000 | – | $583,580 |
Comment fonctionnent les figures modélisées. An undisclosed lead role after the breakthrough gets the median of disclosed lead salaries for its era and budget band, capped at 15% of the film’s budget. Supporting and pre-breakthrough roles get 2.5% of that median, the documented going rate for actors before stardom. Films with no reported budget are treated as small productions. Undocumented backend, endorsements, and producer or director credits enter as separate estimated lines in the calculation above, built from disclosed medians. Every median comes from the published tables on our page méthodologie.
Patrimoine net Over Time
Solde modélisé à la fin de chaque année, correspondant au tableau année par année ci-dessous.
Année par année
| Year | Income | Frais de représentation | Taux d'imposition | Spent | Saved | Balance |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | $24,300,460 | $3,645,069 | 45% | $6,261,888 | $5,098,577 | $168,335,826 |
| 2025 | $19,172,651 | $2,875,898 | 45% | $4,940,524 | $4,022,691 | $159,997,304 |
| 2024 | $6,271,104 | $940,666 | 45% | $1,615,976 | $1,315,765 | $145,384,650 |
| 2023 | $31,046,717 | $4,657,008 | 45% | $8,000,304 | $6,514,036 | $133,401,624 |
| 2022 | $39,178,084 | $5,876,713 | 45% | $10,095,644 | $8,220,111 | $116,462,826 |
| 2021 | $13,239,155 | $1,985,873 | 45% | $3,411,545 | $2,777,760 | $116,157,077 |
| 2020 | $23,311,570 | $3,496,736 | 45% | $6,007,065 | $4,891,094 | $104,574,317 |
| 2019 | $21,118,321 | $3,167,748 | 45% | $5,441,896 | $4,430,919 | $92,788,655 |
| 2018 | $33,534,541 | $5,030,181 | 45% | $8,641,382 | $7,036,016 | $79,859,632 |
| 2017 | $40,040,204 | $6,006,031 | 47% | $9,942,607 | $8,095,505 | $72,400,796 |
| 2016 | $41,122,805 | $6,168,421 | 47% | $10,211,434 | $8,314,390 | $59,756,978 |
| 2015 | $27,791,500 | $4,168,725 | 47% | $6,901,063 | $5,619,008 | $48,901,008 |
| 2014 | $31,742,919 | $4,761,438 | 47% | $7,882,262 | $6,417,923 | $42,255,508 |
| 2013 | $42,805,038 | $6,420,756 | 47% | $10,629,159 | $8,654,511 | $33,775,267 |
| 2012 | $31,198,416 | $4,679,762 | 43% | $8,331,737 | $6,783,896 | $23,004,872 |
| 2011 | $11,146,897 | $1,672,035 | 43% | $2,976,850 | $2,423,821 | $15,205,549 |
| 2010 | $15,530,365 | $2,329,555 | 43% | $4,147,483 | $3,376,978 | $12,309,060 |
| 2009 | $19,021,311 | $2,853,197 | 43% | $5,079,763 | $4,136,062 | $8,360,974 |
| 2008 | $5,058,408 | $758,761 | 43% | $1,350,880 | $1,099,918 | $3,856,496 |
| 2007 | $1,751,957 | $262,794 | 43% | $467,871 | $380,952 | $3,030,205 |
| 2006 | $4,894,837 | $734,226 | 43% | $1,307,198 | $1,064,351 | $2,534,370 |
| 2005 | $2,598,349 | $389,752 | 43% | $693,906 | $564,994 | $1,378,370 |
| 2004 | $1,369,533 | $205,430 | 43% | $365,742 | $297,796 | $784,793 |
| 2003 | $1,727,886 | $259,183 | 43% | $461,443 | $375,718 | $461,905 |
| 2002 | $525,222 | $78,783 | 46% | $162,582 | $78,495 | $78,495 |
Model Notes
- PROCURATION DE RÉSIDENCE : résidence non recherchée individuellement pour ce lot ; US-CA par défaut appliqué jusqu'à ce que documenté
- salary comps: 2 disclosed lead fee(s) flagged as non-market outliers (scale / far-below-quote) and excluded from era medians
- Crédit image : Wikimedia Commons via Wikipedia (Chris Pine)
Méthodologie
We rebuild Chris’s career as a yearly time series. Disclosed salaries and documented backend enter as reported, with citations. Undisclosed lead roles get the median of disclosed salaries for their era and budget band, capped at 15% of the film’s budget. Supporting roles and roles from before the breakthrough get 2.5% of that median, the going-rate ratio measured from disclosed pre-stardom deals. Films with no reported budget are treated as small productions, and every role is estimated unless a source documents it was unpaid. Representation fees come out at sourced rates, taxes follow the eras actually lived through, spending follows measured household savings behavior unless court documents say otherwise, and what remains compounds at real market returns. Undocumented backend enters as an expected value from disclosed deals, endorsements at the median disclosed ambassador fee, and producer or director credits at union-scale floors.
Le modèle complet, chaque tableau de taux et la façon dont nos estimations ont été comparées aux offres réelles sont disponibles. page méthodologie.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is Chris Pine's net worth in 2026?
As of 2026, Chris Pine's net worth is an estimated $168.3 Million. The estimate is built film by film from disclosed salaries and documented backend, then year by year: income, minus representation fees and taxes, minus spending, compounded at real market returns.
How does Chris Pine make money?
Salaires des films et participation backend documentée.
How is Chris Pine's net worth calculated?
Les jours de paie divulgués sont saisis tels que rapportés, avec des citations. Les rôles principaux non divulgués utilisent la médiane des salaires divulgués pour leur époque et leur tranche budgétaire, plafonnés à 15 % du budget du film, et les rôles de soutien ou en début de carrière utilisent la fraction documentée de cette médiane avant la célébrité. Nous soustrayons les frais de représentation, les impôts pour les années où Chris a réellement travaillé et les dépenses du comportement d'épargne mesuré, puis nous composons les rendements réels du marché. Le backend, les avenants et les crédits de production non documentés entrent comme lignes estimées à partir des médianes divulguées. Chaque tarif et source est publié.
How much does Chris Pine make per film?
Cela varie selon le rôle et l'époque, et le tableau film par film ci-dessus répertorie les rémunérations comptabilisées pour chaque titre. Les jours de paie divulgués entrent tels que déclarés. Les rôles non divulgués sont calqués sur ce que des acteurs comparables ont gagné à la même époque et dans la même fourchette budgétaire, les rôles principaux après la percée gagnant le plus et les rôles de soutien ou les premiers rôles une fraction documentée de ce montant.
Pourquoi le taux d'imposition est-il si élevé et les acteurs ne l'évitent-ils pas en faisant appel à une société de prêt ?
L'impôt est calculé au taux effectif de l'endroit où Chris vivait chaque année, qui est le taux indiqué dans le tableau année par année. Dans un État à fiscalité élevée comme la Californie, l'impôt sur le revenu fédéral et celui de l'État combinés atteignent près de la moitié du revenu d'un haut revenu, de sorte que ces années se situent autour de 40 %. Une société de prêt, par laquelle de nombreux acteurs gèrent leurs revenus, ne réduit pas l’impôt sur l’argent qu’ils rapportent à la maison. Son véritable avantage réside dans la déduction des coûts professionnels tels que les honoraires d’agent, de gestionnaire et d’avocat, et le modèle les soustrait déjà sur une ligne distincte avant l’application de toute taxe. Les entreprises à revenus élevés ne bénéficient également pas de la déduction commerciale répercutée à laquelle les autres propriétaires d’entreprise peuvent prétendre, de sorte que cela ne leur permet pas de réduire les taux.
Pourquoi ce chiffre est-il différent de celui des autres sites à valeur nette ?
Most sites publish a single number with no way to check it. This estimate is built in the open: every salary, rate, and assumption is on the page, and the page méthodologie lists every source.
Quelle est la précision de cette estimation ?
Aucune estimation de la valeur nette d’un particulier n’est exacte ; celui-ci est un modèle construit à partir de données publiques. La différence est que vous pouvez voir comment il a été construit et vérifier chaque étape. Le niveau de confiance situé en haut du calcul indique dans quelle mesure le chiffre repose sur des chiffres divulgués, et la page indique où un chiffre s'appuie sur une hypothèse.
Is Chris Pine rich compared to the average person?
Yes. A net worth of $168.3 Million is far above the median American household, which sits near $193,000 according to Federal Reserve data.
What is Chris Pine's biggest source of wealth?
On this page it is film salaries, the largest line in the calculation at $384.7 Million. The full breakdown, with every other line and its source, is above.
How much does Chris Pine make from endorsements?
The model counts $16.0 Million in career endorsement income for Chris: 1 named partnerships x the $4.0M annual fee from the median disclosed film deal x a 4-year term, spread across the deal years. It is an estimate, since the individual deal values are not all public, and it sits as its own line in the calculation above.
Explorez d'autres acteurs
À propos de NetWorth Explained
We originally created NWE because nobody in the public-figure net worth space showed their work. Magazines and sites threw out big numbers while hiding behind vague claims of “proprietary algorithms” ou “insider knowledge.” That’s why we started the world’s only publication that transparently showed every assumption, every variable, and every calculation. We’re still the only ones who do it this way. En savoir plus sur NetWorth Explained.