Daisy Ridley Patrimoine net 2026
Dernière mise à jour August 3, 2026
As of 2026, Daisy Ridley has an estimated net worth of $56.9 Million, computed film by film and year by year from public records and published rates. Every input, rate, and source behind the number is on this page.
Calculation
- Salaires divulgués et backend documenté, chacun avec une citation
- Rôles non divulgués modélisés à partir de comparables divulgués pour leur époque, leur tranche budgétaire et leur étape de carrière
- Backend, avenants et crédits de production estimés à partir des médianes divulguées
Fast Facts
| Birthdate | n / A |
|---|---|
| Birthplace | n / A |
| Breakthrough | career breakthrough modeled at 2015 |
| Best Known | Star Wars: The Last Jedi |
Who Is Daisy Ridley?
Daisy Ridley is best known for Star Wars: The Last Jedi. The earnings behind Daisy's net worth come from film salaries, backend participation, and endorsement deals.
The model tracks Daisy's earning years from 2009 to 2026, with the biggest single year in 2017 at about $25.0 Million of gross income. After representation fees, taxes, and living costs, what stays invested compounds at market returns into an estimated $56.9 Million today.
Data
Chaque ligne ci-dessous est calculée à partir des données publiques et des tableaux de tarifs publiés sur notre page méthodologie. Confiance: Catégorie C. Les chiffres documentés ne couvrent qu’une petite partie de ce chiffre, de sorte que la majeure partie est modélisée à partir de taux publiés et de comparables (les notes vont de A, principalement documentées, à C, principalement modélisées).
The Calculation
| Line | Amount |
|---|---|
| Revenue | |
| Film pay, modeled lead roles (26 of 50 films) era and budget-band medians of disclosed lead salaries (winsorized, thin cells shrunk toward the era median), blended with this actor's disclosed quote history when available; soft breakthrough blend near the career break year | $107,448,580 |
| Film pay, modeled post-breakthrough supporting roles (9 of 50 films) 12.0% of lead cells: lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio | $19,356,719 |
| Film pay, modeled supporting and early roles (15 of 50 films) 2,5% des médianes de l'époque : le taux de pré-célébrité | $10,106,854 |
| Points back-end, estimés 12% of disclosed lead deals included points, at a median 2.6% of box office; expected value on 9 commercially viable undisclosed lead roles; cash spread over 3 years | $14,900,625 |
| Approbations, estimées (1 partenariat de marque) 1 named partnerships x the $4.0M annual fee from the median disclosed film deal x a 4-year term, spread across the deal years | $16,000,000 |
| Résidus, estimés SAG residual rates on post-theatrical receipts assumed at half of box office, split by role share and spread over the ten years after each release | $29,699,266 |
| TV: Casualty Fran Bedingfield; guest default per credited year; broadcast network family; priced from tv_episode_rates.csv (en.wikipedia.org) | $30,000 |
| TV: Youngers Jessie; guest default per credited year; animation format tier; priced from tv_episode_rates.csv (en.wikipedia.org) | $24,000 |
| TV: Toast of London Charlotte; guest default per credited year; broadcast network family; priced from tv_episode_rates.csv (en.wikipedia.org) | $30,000 |
| TV: Silent Witness Hannah Kennedy; guest default per credited year; broadcast network family; priced from tv_episode_rates.csv (en.wikipedia.org) | $30,000 |
| TV: Mr. Selfridge Roxy Starlet; guest default per credited year; broadcast network family; priced from tv_episode_rates.csv (en.wikipedia.org) | $30,000 |
| TV: Star Wars Forces of Destiny Rey; stated episode count; animation format tier; priced from tv_episode_rates.csv (en.wikipedia.org) | $120,000 |
| TV: We Were There Narrator; guest default per credited year; cable network family; priced from tv_episode_rates.csv (en.wikipedia.org) | $30,000 |
| Retour sur investissement de l'épargne mixed portfolio: 55% actual 60/40 securities returns (taxed) + 45% US long-run home-price rate on the rest | $16,693,068 |
| Expenses | |
| Frais de représentation agent 10% + avocat 5% | -$29,192,272 |
| Taxes Taux effectifs US-CA, année par année | -$75,604,391 |
| Dépenses personnelles measured household savings rates by income, times a 88% entertainment-household factor | -$49,570,083 |
| Valeur nette estimée | $56,941,466 |
Film par film
| Film | Year | Role | Budget | Billetterie | Salaire compté |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ebenezer: A Christmas Carol no disclosed fee: modeled on the $25.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid); budget unreported, small-film terms | 2026 | Lead | – | – | $2,998,449 |
| TBA no disclosed fee: modeled on the $25.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid); budget unreported, small-film terms | 2026 | Lead | – | – | $2,998,449 |
| We Were There no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $25.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio); budget unreported, small-film terms | 2026 | Supporting | – | – | $2,998,449 |
| Butterfly Journey no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $25.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio); budget unreported, small-film terms | 2025 | Supporting | – | – | $2,996,981 |
| Cleaner no disclosed fee: modeled on the $21.7M shrunk median for 2020s/mid (n=1), capped at $3.8M | 2025 | Lead | $25,000,000 | $1,300,000 | $3,745,922 |
| Grande Envie no disclosed fee: modeled on the $25.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid); budget unreported, small-film terms | 2025 | Lead | – | – | $2,996,981 |
| We Bury the Dead no disclosed fee: modeled on the $25.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid), capped at $0.6M | 2025 | Lead | $4,000,000 | $4,000,000 | $600,000 |
| Magpie no disclosed fee: modeled on the $25.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid); budget unreported, small-film terms | 2024 | Lead | – | – | $2,994,128 |
| Young Woman and the Sea no disclosed fee: modeled on the $21.7M shrunk median for 2020s/mid (n=1), capped at $6.0M | 2024 | Lead | $40,000,000 | $1,900,000 | $5,986,504 |
| Sometimes I Think About Dying no disclosed fee: modeled on the $25.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid); budget unreported, small-film terms | 2023 | Lead | – | $245,127 | $2,988,589 |
| The Inventor no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $25.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio), capped at 15% of budget | 2023 | Supporting | $10,000,000 | $4,000,000 | $1,495,796 |
| The Marsh King's Daughter no disclosed fee: modeled on the $25.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid), capped at $0.5M | 2023 | Lead | $3,300,000 | $3,300,000 | $495,000 |
| The Bubble no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $25.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio); budget unreported, small-film terms | 2022 | Supporting | – | – | $2,977,875 |
| Chaos Walking no disclosed fee: modeled on the $16.4M shrunk median for 2020s/tentpole (n=5) | 2021 | Lead | $125,000,000 | $27,000,000 | $16,140,471 |
| Twelve Minutes no disclosed fee: modeled on the $25.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid); budget unreported, small-film terms | 2021 | Lead | – | – | $2,957,283 |
| Asteroid Hunters no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $25.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio); budget unreported, small-film terms | 2020 | Supporting | – | – | $2,918,193 |
| Baba Yaga no disclosed fee: modeled on the $25.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid); budget unreported, small-film terms | 2020 | Lead | – | – | $2,918,193 |
| Disneyland no disclosed fee: modeled on the $25.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid); budget unreported, small-film terms | 2020 | Lead | – | – | $2,918,193 |
| The Dawn of Art no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $25.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio); budget unreported, small-film terms | 2020 | Supporting | – | – | $2,918,193 |
| Star Wars: Rise of the Resistance no disclosed fee: modeled on the $5.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid); budget unreported, small-film terms | 2019 | Lead | – | – | $2,813,214 |
| Star Wars: The Rise of Skywalker no disclosed fee: modeled on the $15.8M shrunk median for 2010s/blockbuster (n=11) | 2019 | Lead | $275,000,000 | $1,074,144,248 | $14,770,330 |
| Murder on the Orient Express no disclosed fee: modeled on the $5.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid), capped at $0.2M | 2018 | Lead | $1,400,000 | $27,634,716 | $199,868 |
| Ophelia no disclosed fee: modeled on the $5.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid), capped at $0.1M | 2018 | Lead | $338,940 | $338,940 | $50,841 |
| Peter Rabbit no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $20.0M shrunk median for 2010s/large (n=8) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio) | 2018 | Supporting | $50,000,000 | $351,300,000 | $2,173,514 |
| Murder on the Orient Express soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.79): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $20.0M shrunk median for 2010s/large (n=8), capped at $8.2M vs early terms | 2017 | Lead | $55,000,000 | $352,789,811 | $6,633,284 |
| Star Wars Battlefront II soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.79): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $5.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid); budget unreported, small-film terms vs early terms | 2017 | Lead | – | – | $2,400,250 |
| Star Wars: The Last Jedi soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.79): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $15.8M shrunk median for 2010s/blockbuster (n=11) vs early terms | 2017 | Lead | $200,000,000 | $1,334,000,000 | $12,561,875 |
| Alliance of Women Film Journalists soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.66): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $5.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid); budget unreported, small-film terms vs early terms | 2016 | Lead | – | – | $2,024,675 |
| Best Breakthrough Performance soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.66): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $5.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid); budget unreported, small-film terms vs early terms | 2016 | Lead | – | – | $2,024,675 |
| Lego Star Wars: The Force Awakens soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.66): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $5.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid); budget unreported, small-film terms vs early terms | 2016 | Lead | – | – | $2,024,675 |
| Only Yesterday soft-breakthrough supporting blend (w=0.66) | 2016 | Supporting | – | – | $438,859 |
| The Eagle Huntress soft-breakthrough supporting blend (w=0.66) | 2016 | Supporting | $4,400,000 | $4,400,000 | $438,859 |
| Disney Infinity 3.0 soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.50): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $5.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid); budget unreported, small-film terms vs early terms | 2015 | Lead | – | – | $1,562,500 |
| Scrawl soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.50): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $5.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid); budget unreported, small-film terms vs early terms | 2015 | Lead | – | – | $1,562,500 |
| Star Wars: The Force Awakens soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.50): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $15.8M shrunk median for 2010s/blockbuster (n=11) vs early terms | 2015 | Lead | $245,000,000 | $2,068,223,624 | $8,081,731 |
| Mr. Selfridge soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.34): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $5.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid); budget unreported, small-film terms vs early terms | 2014 | Lead | – | – | $1,100,325 |
| Silent Witness soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.34): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $5.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid); budget unreported, small-film terms vs early terms | 2014 | Lead | – | – | $1,100,325 |
| Star Wars Forces of Destiny soft-breakthrough supporting blend (w=0.34) | 2014 | Supporting | – | – | $286,141 |
| The Quiet Ones soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.34): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $5.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid), capped at $0.0M vs early terms | 2014 | Lead | $200,000 | $17,800,000 | $30,000 |
| Under soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.34): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $5.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid); budget unreported, small-film terms vs early terms | 2014 | Lead | – | – | $1,100,325 |
| 100% BEEF soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.21): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $5.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid); budget unreported, small-film terms vs early terms | 2013 | Lead | – | – | $724,750 |
| Blue Season soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.21): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $5.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid); budget unreported, small-film terms vs early terms | 2013 | Lead | – | – | $724,750 |
| Casualty soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.21): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $5.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid); budget unreported, small-film terms vs early terms | 2013 | Lead | – | – | $724,750 |
| Crossed Wires soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.21): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $5.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid); budget unreported, small-film terms vs early terms | 2013 | Lead | – | – | $724,750 |
| Lifesaver soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.21): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $5.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid); budget unreported, small-film terms vs early terms | 2013 | Lead | – | – | $724,750 |
| Toast of London soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.21): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $5.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid); budget unreported, small-film terms vs early terms | 2013 | Lead | – | – | $724,750 |
| Wiley (rapper) soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.21): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $5.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid); budget unreported, small-film terms vs early terms | 2013 | Lead | – | – | $724,750 |
| Youngers soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.21): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $5.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid); budget unreported, small-film terms vs early terms | 2013 | Lead | – | – | $724,750 |
| Dominoes no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $5.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid) (pre-stardom rate); budget unreported, small-film terms; soft-breakthrough weight 0.12 | 2012 | Lead | – | – | $467,708 |
| The Boy Friend no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $5.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid) (pre-stardom rate); budget unreported, small-film terms; soft-breakthrough weight 0.03 | 2010 | Lead | – | – | $224,030 |
Comment fonctionnent les figures modélisées. An undisclosed lead role after the breakthrough gets the median of disclosed lead salaries for its era and budget band, capped at 15% of the film’s budget. Supporting and pre-breakthrough roles get 2.5% of that median, the documented going rate for actors before stardom. Films with no reported budget are treated as small productions. Undocumented backend, endorsements, and producer or director credits enter as separate estimated lines in the calculation above, built from disclosed medians. Every median comes from the published tables on our page méthodologie.
Patrimoine net Over Time
Solde modélisé à la fin de chaque année, correspondant au tableau année par année ci-dessous.
Année par année
| Year | Income | Frais de représentation | Taux d'imposition | Spent | Saved | Balance |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | $8,061,656 | $1,209,248 | 45% | $2,077,376 | $1,691,448 | $56,941,466 |
| 2025 | $12,900,433 | $1,935,065 | 45% | $3,324,261 | $2,706,691 | $54,153,411 |
| 2024 | $12,357,677 | $1,853,651 | 45% | $3,184,400 | $2,592,814 | $47,953,722 |
| 2023 | $9,146,346 | $1,371,952 | 45% | $2,356,885 | $1,919,031 | $42,002,261 |
| 2022 | $6,541,296 | $981,194 | 45% | $1,685,600 | $1,372,455 | $36,790,093 |
| 2021 | $18,305,430 | $2,745,815 | 45% | $4,717,053 | $3,840,736 | $38,007,262 |
| 2020 | $17,972,467 | $2,695,870 | 45% | $4,631,253 | $3,770,875 | $31,513,166 |
| 2019 | $20,966,698 | $3,145,005 | 45% | $5,402,824 | $4,399,107 | $25,823,501 |
| 2018 | $15,024,492 | $2,253,674 | 45% | $3,871,601 | $3,152,349 | $19,363,831 |
| 2017 | $24,977,685 | $3,746,653 | 47% | $6,202,349 | $5,050,098 | $16,117,357 |
| 2016 | $18,695,614 | $2,804,342 | 47% | $4,642,413 | $3,779,961 | $10,284,472 |
| 2015 | $16,052,481 | $2,407,872 | 47% | $3,986,081 | $3,245,561 | $6,183,147 |
| 2014 | $5,954,001 | $893,100 | 47% | $1,478,471 | $1,203,806 | $2,867,917 |
| 2013 | $5,227,732 | $784,160 | 47% | $1,298,128 | $1,056,966 | $1,568,348 |
| 2012 | $2,066,795 | $310,019 | 43% | $551,951 | $449,411 | $468,309 |
| 2011 | $140,313 | $21,047 | 43% | $61,401 | $6,581 | $17,715 |
| 2010 | $156,821 | $23,523 | 43% | $68,625 | $7,355 | $10,722 |
| 2009 | $67,209 | $10,081 | 43% | $29,411 | $3,152 | $3,152 |
Model Notes
- PROCURATION DE RÉSIDENCE : résidence non recherchée individuellement pour ce lot ; US-CA par défaut appliqué jusqu'à ce que documenté
- salary comps: 2 disclosed lead fee(s) flagged as non-market outliers (scale / far-below-quote) and excluded from era medians
- Crédit image : Wikimedia Commons via Wikipedia (Daisy Ridley)
Méthodologie
We rebuild Daisy’s career as a yearly time series. Disclosed salaries and documented backend enter as reported, with citations. Undisclosed lead roles get the median of disclosed salaries for their era and budget band, capped at 15% of the film’s budget. Supporting roles and roles from before the breakthrough get 2.5% of that median, the going-rate ratio measured from disclosed pre-stardom deals. Films with no reported budget are treated as small productions, and every role is estimated unless a source documents it was unpaid. Representation fees come out at sourced rates, taxes follow the eras actually lived through, spending follows measured household savings behavior unless court documents say otherwise, and what remains compounds at real market returns. Undocumented backend enters as an expected value from disclosed deals, endorsements at the median disclosed ambassador fee, and producer or director credits at union-scale floors.
Le modèle complet, chaque tableau de taux et la façon dont nos estimations ont été comparées aux offres réelles sont disponibles. page méthodologie.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is Daisy Ridley's net worth in 2026?
As of 2026, Daisy Ridley's net worth is an estimated $56.9 Million. The estimate is built film by film from disclosed salaries and documented backend, then year by year: income, minus representation fees and taxes, minus spending, compounded at real market returns.
How does Daisy Ridley make money?
Salaires des films et participation backend documentée.
How is Daisy Ridley's net worth calculated?
Disclosed paydays enter as reported, with citations. Undisclosed lead roles use the median of disclosed salaries for their era and budget band, capped at 15% of the film's budget, and supporting or early-career roles use the documented pre-stardom fraction of that median. We subtract sourced representation fees, taxes for the years Daisy actually worked, and spending from measured savings behavior, then compound at real market returns. Undocumented backend, endorsements, and producing credits enter as estimated lines from disclosed medians. Every rate and source is published.
How much does Daisy Ridley make per film?
Cela varie selon le rôle et l'époque, et le tableau film par film ci-dessus répertorie les rémunérations comptabilisées pour chaque titre. Les jours de paie divulgués entrent tels que déclarés. Les rôles non divulgués sont calqués sur ce que des acteurs comparables ont gagné à la même époque et dans la même fourchette budgétaire, les rôles principaux après la percée gagnant le plus et les rôles de soutien ou les premiers rôles une fraction documentée de ce montant.
Pourquoi le taux d'imposition est-il si élevé et les acteurs ne l'évitent-ils pas en faisant appel à une société de prêt ?
Tax comes out at the effective rate for where Daisy lived each year, which is the rate shown in the year-by-year table. In a high-tax state like California, combined federal and state income tax reaches close to half of a top earner's income, so those years run in the mid-40s percent. A loan-out company, the corporation many actors run their income through, does not lower the tax on the money they take home. Its real advantage is deducting business costs such as agent, manager, and attorney fees, and the model already subtracts those as a separate line before any tax is applied. High-earning performers also fall outside the pass-through business deduction that other company owners can claim, so it buys them no rate cut.
Pourquoi ce chiffre est-il différent de celui des autres sites à valeur nette ?
Most sites publish a single number with no way to check it. This estimate is built in the open: every salary, rate, and assumption is on the page, and the page méthodologie lists every source.
Quelle est la précision de cette estimation ?
Aucune estimation de la valeur nette d’un particulier n’est exacte ; celui-ci est un modèle construit à partir de données publiques. La différence est que vous pouvez voir comment il a été construit et vérifier chaque étape. Le niveau de confiance situé en haut du calcul indique dans quelle mesure le chiffre repose sur des chiffres divulgués, et la page indique où un chiffre s'appuie sur une hypothèse.
Is Daisy Ridley rich compared to the average person?
Yes. A net worth of $56.9 Million is far above the median American household, which sits near $193,000 according to Federal Reserve data.
What is Daisy Ridley's biggest source of wealth?
On this page it is film salaries, the largest line in the calculation at $107.4 Million. The full breakdown, with every other line and its source, is above.
How much does Daisy Ridley make from endorsements?
The model counts $16.0 Million in career endorsement income for Daisy: 1 named partnerships x the $4.0M annual fee from the median disclosed film deal x a 4-year term, spread across the deal years. It is an estimate, since the individual deal values are not all public, and it sits as its own line in the calculation above.
Explorez d'autres acteurs
À propos de NetWorth Explained
We originally created NWE because nobody in the public-figure net worth space showed their work. Magazines and sites threw out big numbers while hiding behind vague claims of “proprietary algorithms” ou “insider knowledge.” That’s why we started the world’s only publication that transparently showed every assumption, every variable, and every calculation. We’re still the only ones who do it this way. En savoir plus sur NetWorth Explained.