Jennifer Lawrence Patrimoine net 2026
Dernière mise à jour August 3, 2026
As of 2026, Jennifer Lawrence has an estimated net worth of $150.7 Million, computed film by film and year by year from public records and published rates. Every input, rate, and source behind the number is on this page.
Calculation
- Salaires divulgués et backend documenté, chacun avec une citation
- Rôles non divulgués modélisés à partir de comparables divulgués pour leur époque, leur tranche budgétaire et leur étape de carrière
- Backend, avenants et crédits de production estimés à partir des médianes divulguées
Fast Facts
| Birthdate | August 15, 1990 |
|---|---|
| Birthplace | Indian Hills |
| Breakthrough | Winter's Bone (2010) |
| Best Known | The Hunger Games (2012) |
Who Is Jennifer Lawrence?
Jennifer Lawrence was born August 15, 1990 in Indian Hills, best known for The Hunger Games (2012). The earnings behind Jennifer's net worth come from film salaries, backend participation, and endorsement deals.
The model tracks Jennifer's earning years from 2005 to 2026, with the biggest single year in 2014 at about $52.7 Million of gross income. After representation fees, taxes, and living costs, what stays invested compounds at market returns into an estimated $150.7 Million today.
Data
Chaque ligne ci-dessous est calculée à partir des données publiques et des tableaux de tarifs publiés sur notre page méthodologie. Confiance: Catégorie C. Les chiffres documentés ne couvrent qu’une petite partie de ce chiffre, de sorte que la majeure partie est modélisée à partir de taux publiés et de comparables (les notes vont de A, principalement documentées, à C, principalement modélisées).
The Calculation
| Line | Amount |
|---|---|
| Revenue | |
| Film pay with a disclosed figure (2 of 36 films) salaires par film et backend à partir des rapports cités | $45,000,000 |
| Film pay, modeled lead roles (20 of 36 films) era and budget-band medians of disclosed lead salaries (winsorized, thin cells shrunk toward the era median), blended with this actor's disclosed quote history when available; soft breakthrough blend near the career break year | $269,806,286 |
| Film pay, modeled post-breakthrough supporting roles (3 of 36 films) 12.0% of lead cells: lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio | $8,259,563 |
| Film pay, modeled supporting and early roles (11 of 36 films) 2,5% des médianes de l'époque : le taux de pré-célébrité | $14,131,066 |
| Points back-end, estimés 12% of disclosed lead deals included points, at a median 2.6% of box office; expected value on 19 commercially viable undisclosed lead roles; cash spread over 3 years; 4 film(s) used band-specific box-office/budget multiples as a gross proxy | $18,245,328 |
| Approbations, estimées (3 partenariats de marque) 3 named partnerships x the $5.0M annual fee from the median disclosed film deal, scaled 1.25x to this actor's quote vs era median x a 4-year term, spread across the deal years | $60,000,000 |
| Résidus, estimés SAG residual rates on post-theatrical receipts assumed at half of box office, split by role share and spread over the ten years after each release; 12 film(s) used band-specific box-office proxies | $42,470,869 |
| TV: Monk Mascot; guest default per credited year; cable network family; priced from tv_episode_rates.csv (en.wikipedia.org) | $30,000 |
| TV: Cold Case credited role; guest default per credited year; broadcast network family; priced from tv_episode_rates.csv (en.wikipedia.org) | $30,000 |
| TV: Medium Young Allison / Claire Chase; stated episode count; broadcast network family; priced from tv_episode_rates.csv (en.wikipedia.org) | $30,000 |
| TV: The Bill Engvall Show credited role; series episode total for a full-run credit; cable network family; priced from tv_episode_rates.csv (en.wikipedia.org) | $6,000,000 |
| TV: Saturday Night Live Herself (host); guest default per credited year; variety format tier; priced from tv_episode_rates.csv (en.wikipedia.org) | $30,000 |
| TV: Jimmy Kimmel Live! Herself (host); guest default per credited year; talk format tier; priced from tv_episode_rates.csv (en.wikipedia.org) | $10,000 |
| Retour sur investissement de l'épargne mixed portfolio: 55% actual 60/40 securities returns (taxed) + 45% US long-run home-price rate on the rest | $55,525,365 |
| Expenses | |
| Frais de représentation agent 10% + avocat 5% | -$68,959,097 |
| Taxes Taux effectifs US-NY, année par année | -$178,574,975 |
| Dépenses personnelles measured household savings rates by income, times a 88% entertainment-household factor | -$116,990,771 |
| Valeur nette estimée | $150,727,833 |
Film par film
| Film | Year | Role | Budget | Billetterie | Salaire compté |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| The Hunger Games: Sunrise on the Reaping no disclosed fee: modeled on the $23.8M shrunk median for 2020s/large (n=2); blended 75% with this actor's disclosed quote history ($25.0M personal, n=1); cap raised to similar-budget personal max within 50% of budget ($25.0M) | 2026 | Lead | $70,000,000 | – | $24,685,370 |
| What Happens at Night no disclosed fee: modeled on the $23.8M shrunk median for 2020s/large (n=2); blended 75% with this actor's disclosed quote history ($25.0M personal, n=1); cap raised to similar-budget personal max within 50% of budget ($25.0M) | 2026 | Lead | $70,000,000 | – | $24,685,370 |
| Die My Love no disclosed fee: modeled on the $25.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid); personal blend cut to 24% on a smaller-than-usual budget; blended 24% with this actor's disclosed quote history ($25.0M personal, n=1); cap raised to similar-budget personal max within 50% of budget ($6.1M), capped at $6.1M | 2025 | Lead | $12,200,000 | $12,200,000 | $6,099,057 |
| Zurawski v Texas no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $23.8M shrunk median for 2020s/large (n=2) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio) | 2024 | Supporting | $70,000,000 | – | $2,999,193 |
| Bread and Roses no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $23.8M shrunk median for 2020s/large (n=2) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio) | 2023 | Supporting | $70,000,000 | – | $2,998,429 |
| No Hard Feelings no disclosed fee: modeled on the $21.7M shrunk median for 2020s/mid (n=1); personal blend cut to 73% on a smaller-than-usual budget; blended 73% with this actor's disclosed quote history ($25.0M personal, n=2); cap raised to similar-budget personal max within 50% of budget ($22.5M), capped at $22.5M | 2023 | Lead | $45,000,000 | $87,300,000 | $22,485,662 |
| Causeway no disclosed fee: modeled on the $23.8M shrunk median for 2020s/large (n=2); blended 75% with this actor's disclosed quote history ($25.0M personal, n=2); cap raised to similar-budget personal max within 50% of budget ($25.0M) | 2022 | Lead | $70,000,000 | – | $24,656,876 |
| Don't Look Up disclosed: Variety: $25M streaming salary | 2021 | Lead | $75,000,000 | $1,172,913 | $25,000,000 |
| Dark Phoenix no disclosed fee: modeled on the $15.8M shrunk median for 2010s/blockbuster (n=11); blended 75% with this actor's disclosed quote history ($20.0M personal, n=1) | 2019 | Lead | $200,000,000 | $244,676,878 | $18,769,515 |
| Red Sparrow no disclosed fee: modeled on the $20.0M shrunk median for 2010s/large (n=8); blended 75% with this actor's disclosed quote history ($20.0M personal, n=1); cap raised to similar-budget personal max within 50% of budget ($20.0M) | 2018 | Lead | $69,000,000 | $151,572,634 | $19,649,269 |
| Mother! no disclosed fee: modeled on the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3); personal blend cut to 41% on a smaller-than-usual budget; blended 41% with this actor's disclosed quote history ($20.0M personal, n=1); cap raised to similar-budget personal max within 50% of budget ($15.0M) | 2017 | Lead | $30,000,000 | $44,500,000 | $14,185,573 |
| A Beautiful Planet no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio) | 2016 | Supporting | $40,000,000 | $25,700,000 | $2,261,941 |
| Passengers disclosed: reported $20M, widely covered at the time | 2016 | Lead | $110,000,000 | $303,144,152 | $20,000,000 |
| X-Men: Apocalypse no disclosed fee: modeled on the $20.0M shrunk median for 2010s/tentpole (n=12); blended 75% with this actor's disclosed quote history ($20.0M personal, n=1) | 2016 | Lead | $178,000,000 | $543,934,105 | $18,733,101 |
| Joy no disclosed fee: modeled on the $20.0M shrunk median for 2010s/large (n=8); blended 75% with this actor's disclosed quote history ($20.0M personal, n=1); cap raised to similar-budget personal max within 50% of budget ($20.0M) | 2015 | Lead | $60,000,000 | $101,100,000 | $17,675,543 |
| The Hunger Games: Mockingjay – Part 2 no disclosed fee: modeled on the $20.0M shrunk median for 2010s/tentpole (n=12); blended 75% with this actor's disclosed quote history ($20.0M personal, n=1) | 2015 | Lead | $160,000,000 | $661,456,563 | $17,675,543 |
| Serena soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.79): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3), capped at $4.1M vs early terms | 2014 | Lead | $27,500,000 | $5,000,000 | $3,321,857 |
| The Hunger Games: Mockingjay – Part 1 soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.79): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $20.0M shrunk median for 2010s/tentpole (n=12), capped at $18.8M vs early terms | 2014 | Lead | $125,000,000 | $755,356,711 | $14,942,894 |
| X-Men: Days of Future Past soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.79): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $15.8M shrunk median for 2010s/blockbuster (n=11) vs early terms | 2014 | Lead | $210,000,000 | $746,045,700 | $12,561,875 |
| American Hustle soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.66): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3), capped at $6.0M vs early terms | 2013 | Lead | $40,000,000 | $251,000,000 | $4,057,830 |
| The Devil You Know soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.66): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3), capped at $6.0M vs early terms | 2013 | Lead | $40,000,000 | – | $4,057,830 |
| The Hunger Games: Catching Fire soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.66): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $20.0M shrunk median for 2010s/tentpole (n=12), capped at $19.5M vs early terms | 2013 | Lead | $130,000,000 | $865,011,746 | $13,054,371 |
| House at the End of the Street soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.50): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $5.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid), capped at $1.3M vs early terms | 2012 | Lead | $8,450,000 | $44,300,000 | $696,250 |
| Silver Linings Playbook soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.50): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3), capped at $3.1M vs early terms | 2012 | Lead | $21,000,000 | $236,412,453 | $1,712,500 |
| The Hunger Games (film) soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.50): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $20.0M shrunk median for 2010s/large (n=8), capped at $11.7M vs early terms | 2012 | Lead | $78,000,000 | $695,220,619 | $6,100,000 |
| Like Crazy soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.34): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $5.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid), capped at $0.0M vs early terms | 2011 | Lead | $250,000 | $3,800,000 | $37,500 |
| The Beaver (film) soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.34): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3), capped at $3.1M vs early terms | 2011 | Lead | $21,000,000 | $7,300,000 | $1,250,325 |
| X-Men: First Class soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.34): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $20.0M shrunk median for 2010s/tentpole (n=12) vs early terms | 2011 | Lead | $160,000,000 | $353,624,124 | $7,115,251 |
| Parachute (band) soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.21): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3), capped at $6.0M vs early terms | 2010 | Lead | $40,000,000 | – | $1,469,284 |
| Winter's Bone soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.21): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $5.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid), capped at $0.3M vs early terms | 2010 | Lead | $2,000,000 | $16,100,000 | $161,506 |
| Garden Party no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $19.4M shrunk median for 2000s/mid (n=2) (pre-stardom rate); soft-breakthrough weight 0.06 | 2008 | Lead | $40,000,000 | – | $842,721 |
| The Burning Plain no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $19.4M shrunk median for 2000s/mid (n=2) (pre-stardom rate); soft-breakthrough weight 0.06 | 2008 | Lead | $20,000,000 | $5,500,000 | $647,813 |
| Cold Case no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $19.4M shrunk median for 2000s/mid (n=2) (pre-stardom rate); soft-breakthrough weight 0.03 | 2007 | Lead | $40,000,000 | – | $674,362 |
| Medium no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $19.4M shrunk median for 2000s/mid (n=2) (pre-stardom rate); soft-breakthrough weight 0.03 | 2007 | Lead | $40,000,000 | – | $674,362 |
| The Bill Engvall Show no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $19.4M shrunk median for 2000s/mid (n=2) (pre-stardom rate); soft-breakthrough weight 0.03 | 2007 | Lead | $40,000,000 | – | $674,362 |
| Monk no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $19.4M shrunk median for 2000s/mid (n=2) (pre-stardom rate); soft-breakthrough weight 0.02 | 2006 | Lead | $40,000,000 | – | $583,580 |
Comment fonctionnent les figures modélisées. An undisclosed lead role after the breakthrough gets the median of disclosed lead salaries for its era and budget band, capped at 15% of the film’s budget. Supporting and pre-breakthrough roles get 2.5% of that median, the documented going rate for actors before stardom. Films with no reported budget are treated as small productions. Undocumented backend, endorsements, and producer or director credits enter as separate estimated lines in the calculation above, built from disclosed medians. Every median comes from the published tables on our page méthodologie.
Patrimoine net Over Time
Solde modélisé à la fin de chaque année, correspondant au tableau année par année ci-dessous.
Année par année
| Year | Income | Frais de représentation | Taux d'imposition | Spent | Saved | Balance |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | $35,835,801 | $5,375,370 | 45% | $9,234,384 | $7,518,853 | $150,727,833 |
| 2025 | $20,587,655 | $3,088,148 | 45% | $5,305,150 | $4,319,578 | $140,366,557 |
| 2024 | $6,449,170 | $967,376 | 45% | $1,661,861 | $1,353,126 | $126,810,011 |
| 2023 | $21,889,763 | $3,283,464 | 45% | $5,640,685 | $4,592,779 | $116,167,708 |
| 2022 | $28,458,311 | $4,268,747 | 45% | $7,333,308 | $5,970,952 | $102,408,216 |
| 2021 | $36,264,082 | $5,439,612 | 45% | $9,344,746 | $7,608,712 | $103,488,450 |
| 2020 | $4,072,848 | $610,927 | 45% | $1,049,516 | $854,541 | $88,433,749 |
| 2019 | $17,111,605 | $2,566,741 | 45% | $4,409,421 | $3,590,254 | $81,521,811 |
| 2018 | $23,618,573 | $3,542,786 | 45% | $6,086,176 | $4,955,507 | $70,436,227 |
| 2017 | $20,789,825 | $3,118,474 | 47% | $5,162,438 | $4,203,378 | $65,100,532 |
| 2016 | $44,929,497 | $6,739,425 | 47% | $11,156,695 | $9,084,043 | $56,589,899 |
| 2015 | $52,224,055 | $7,833,608 | 47% | $12,968,047 | $10,558,889 | $45,158,773 |
| 2014 | $52,686,802 | $7,903,020 | 47% | $13,082,955 | $10,652,449 | $33,779,300 |
| 2013 | $42,362,484 | $6,354,373 | 47% | $10,519,266 | $8,565,033 | $21,795,988 |
| 2012 | $28,782,099 | $4,317,315 | 43% | $7,686,444 | $6,258,483 | $12,116,531 |
| 2011 | $8,696,661 | $1,304,499 | 43% | $2,322,499 | $1,891,033 | $5,491,336 |
| 2010 | $3,873,287 | $580,993 | 43% | $1,034,386 | $842,221 | $3,467,164 |
| 2009 | $2,700,048 | $405,007 | 43% | $721,065 | $587,108 | $2,457,106 |
| 2008 | $3,224,408 | $483,661 | 43% | $861,099 | $701,127 | $1,706,933 |
| 2007 | $3,949,829 | $592,474 | 43% | $1,054,827 | $858,865 | $1,105,646 |
| 2006 | $1,045,432 | $156,815 | 43% | $279,189 | $227,322 | $236,079 |
| 2005 | $175,074 | $26,261 | 43% | $76,612 | $8,211 | $8,211 |
Model Notes
- RESIDENCE PROXY: public New York base in recent years
- salary comps: 2 disclosed lead fee(s) flagged as non-market outliers (scale / far-below-quote) and excluded from era medians
- Crédit image : Wikimedia Commons via Wikipedia (Jennifer Lawrence)
Méthodologie
We rebuild Jennifer’s career as a yearly time series. Disclosed salaries and documented backend enter as reported, with citations. Undisclosed lead roles get the median of disclosed salaries for their era and budget band, capped at 15% of the film’s budget. Supporting roles and roles from before the breakthrough get 2.5% of that median, the going-rate ratio measured from disclosed pre-stardom deals. Films with no reported budget are treated as small productions, and every role is estimated unless a source documents it was unpaid. Representation fees come out at sourced rates, taxes follow the eras actually lived through, spending follows measured household savings behavior unless court documents say otherwise, and what remains compounds at real market returns. Undocumented backend enters as an expected value from disclosed deals, endorsements at the median disclosed ambassador fee, and producer or director credits at union-scale floors.
Le modèle complet, chaque tableau de taux et la façon dont nos estimations ont été comparées aux offres réelles sont disponibles. page méthodologie.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is Jennifer Lawrence's net worth in 2026?
As of 2026, Jennifer Lawrence's net worth is an estimated $150.7 Million. The estimate is built film by film from disclosed salaries and documented backend, then year by year: income, minus representation fees and taxes, minus spending, compounded at real market returns.
How does Jennifer Lawrence make money?
Salaires des films et participation backend documentée.
How is Jennifer Lawrence's net worth calculated?
Les jours de paie divulgués sont saisis tels que rapportés, avec des citations. Les rôles principaux non divulgués utilisent la médiane des salaires divulgués pour leur époque et leur tranche budgétaire, plafonnés à 15 % du budget du film, et les rôles de soutien ou en début de carrière utilisent la fraction documentée de cette médiane avant la célébrité. Nous soustrayons les frais de représentation, les impôts pour les années où Jennifer a réellement travaillé et les dépenses du comportement d'épargne mesuré, puis nous composons les rendements réels du marché. Le backend, les avenants et les crédits de production non documentés entrent comme lignes estimées à partir des médianes divulguées. Chaque tarif et source est publié.
How much does Jennifer Lawrence make per film?
Cela varie selon le rôle et l'époque, et le tableau film par film ci-dessus répertorie les rémunérations comptabilisées pour chaque titre. Les jours de paie divulgués entrent tels que déclarés. Les rôles non divulgués sont calqués sur ce que des acteurs comparables ont gagné à la même époque et dans la même fourchette budgétaire, les rôles principaux après la percée gagnant le plus et les rôles de soutien ou les premiers rôles une fraction documentée de ce montant.
Pourquoi le taux d'imposition est-il si élevé et les acteurs ne l'évitent-ils pas en faisant appel à une société de prêt ?
L'impôt est calculé au taux effectif de l'endroit où Jennifer vivait chaque année, qui est le taux indiqué dans le tableau année par année. Dans un État à fiscalité élevée comme la Californie, l'impôt sur le revenu fédéral et celui de l'État combinés atteignent près de la moitié du revenu d'un haut revenu, de sorte que ces années se situent autour de 40 %. Une société de prêt, par laquelle de nombreux acteurs gèrent leurs revenus, ne réduit pas l’impôt sur l’argent qu’ils rapportent à la maison. Son véritable avantage réside dans la déduction des coûts professionnels tels que les honoraires d’agent, de gestionnaire et d’avocat, et le modèle les soustrait déjà sur une ligne distincte avant l’application de toute taxe. Les entreprises à revenus élevés ne bénéficient également pas de la déduction commerciale répercutée à laquelle les autres propriétaires d’entreprise peuvent prétendre, de sorte que cela ne leur permet pas de réduire les taux.
Pourquoi ce chiffre est-il différent de celui des autres sites à valeur nette ?
Most sites publish a single number with no way to check it. This estimate is built in the open: every salary, rate, and assumption is on the page, and the page méthodologie lists every source.
Quelle est la précision de cette estimation ?
Aucune estimation de la valeur nette d’un particulier n’est exacte ; celui-ci est un modèle construit à partir de données publiques. La différence est que vous pouvez voir comment il a été construit et vérifier chaque étape. Le niveau de confiance situé en haut du calcul indique dans quelle mesure le chiffre repose sur des chiffres divulgués, et la page indique où un chiffre s'appuie sur une hypothèse.
Is Jennifer Lawrence rich compared to the average person?
Yes. A net worth of $150.7 Million is far above the median American household, which sits near $193,000 according to Federal Reserve data.
What is Jennifer Lawrence's biggest source of wealth?
On this page it is film salaries, the largest line in the calculation at $269.8 Million. The full breakdown, with every other line and its source, is above.
How much does Jennifer Lawrence make from endorsements?
The model counts $60.0 Million in career endorsement income for Jennifer: 3 named partnerships x the $5.0M annual fee from the median disclosed film deal, scaled 1.25x to this actor's quote vs era median x a 4-year term, spread across the deal years. It is an estimate, since the individual deal values are not all public, and it sits as its own line in the calculation above.
Explorez d'autres acteurs
À propos de NetWorth Explained
We originally created NWE because nobody in the public-figure net worth space showed their work. Magazines and sites threw out big numbers while hiding behind vague claims of “proprietary algorithms” ou “insider knowledge.” That’s why we started the world’s only publication that transparently showed every assumption, every variable, and every calculation. We’re still the only ones who do it this way. En savoir plus sur NetWorth Explained.