$32.9 Million

Natalia Dyer Patrimoine net 2026

Dernière mise à jour August 3, 2026

As of 2026, Natalia Dyer has an estimated net worth of $32.9 Million, computed film by film and year by year from public records and published rates. Every input, rate, and source behind the number is on this page.

Calculation

  • Salaires divulgués et backend documenté, chacun avec une citation
  • Rôles non divulgués modélisés à partir de comparables divulgués pour leur époque, leur tranche budgétaire et leur étape de carrière
  • Backend, avenants et crédits de production estimés à partir des médianes divulguées
Natalia Dyer

Fast Facts

Birthdaten / A
Birthplacen / A
Breakthroughcareer breakthrough modeled at 2016
Best KnownChoses étranges (2016)

Who Is Natalia Dyer?

Natalia Dyer is best known for Stranger Things (2016). The earnings behind Natalia's net worth come from film salaries, backend participation, and endorsement deals.

The model tracks Natalia's earning years from 2004 to 2026, with the biggest single year in 2023 at about $20.4 Million of gross income. After representation fees, taxes, and living costs, what stays invested compounds at market returns into an estimated $32.9 Million today.

Data

Chaque ligne ci-dessous est calculée à partir des données publiques et des tableaux de tarifs publiés sur notre page méthodologie. Confiance: Catégorie C. Les chiffres documentés ne couvrent qu’une petite partie de ce chiffre, de sorte que la majeure partie est modélisée à partir de taux publiés et de comparables (les notes vont de A, principalement documentées, à C, principalement modélisées).

The Calculation

Natalia Dyer net worth line items
LineAmount
Revenue
Film pay, modeled lead roles (16 of 28 films)
era and budget-band medians of disclosed lead salaries (winsorized, thin cells shrunk toward the era median), blended with this actor's disclosed quote history when available; soft breakthrough blend near the career break year
$37,706,157
Film pay, modeled post-breakthrough supporting roles (1 of 28 films)
12.0% of lead cells: lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio
$438,859
Film pay, modeled supporting and early roles (11 of 28 films)
2,5% des médianes de l'époque : le taux de pré-célébrité
$5,775,041
Points back-end, estimés
12% of disclosed lead deals included points, at a median 2.6% of box office; expected value on 4 commercially viable undisclosed lead roles; cash spread over 3 years; 2 film(s) used band-specific box-office/budget multiples as a gross proxy
$173,922
Approbations, estimées (1 partenariat de marque)
1 named partnerships x the $4.0M annual fee from the median disclosed film deal x a 4-year term, spread across the deal years
$16,000,000
Résidus, estimés
SAG residual rates on post-theatrical receipts assumed at half of box office, split by role share and spread over the ten years after each release; 2 film(s) used band-specific box-office proxies
$12,437,013
TV: Stranger Things
Nancy Wheeler; series episode total for a full-run credit; streaming network family; priced from tv_episode_rates.csv (en.wikipedia.org)
$25,620,000
TV: Based on a True Story
Chloe Lake; series episode total for a full-run credit; streaming network family; priced from tv_episode_rates.csv (en.wikipedia.org)
$12,000,000
Retour sur investissement de l'épargne
mixed portfolio: 55% actual 60/40 securities returns (taxed) + 45% US long-run home-price rate on the rest
$10,129,189
Expenses
Frais de représentation
agent 10% + avocat 5%
-$16,498,002
Taxes
Taux effectifs US-CA, année par année
-$42,432,502
Dépenses personnelles
measured household savings rates by income, times a 88% entertainment-household factor
-$28,282,981
Valeur nette estimée$32,902,383

Film par film

Natalia Dyer film-by-film pay
FilmYearRoleBudgetBilletterieSalaire compté
All Fun and Games
no disclosed fee: modeled on the $25.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid), capped at $0.2M
2023Lead$1,400,000$1,400,000$210,000
Based on a True Story
no disclosed fee: modeled on the $25.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid), capped at $1.9M
2023Lead$12,960,000$3,900,000$1,931,712
Chestnut
no disclosed fee: modeled on the $25.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid); budget unreported, small-film terms
2023Lead$8,631$2,977,875
Goodbye Girl
no disclosed fee: modeled on the $25.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid), capped at $2.4M
2023Lead$16,000,000$2,383,464
Things Heard & Seen
no disclosed fee: modeled on the $25.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid); budget unreported, small-film terms
2021Lead$2,918,193
Acting for a Cause
no disclosed fee: modeled on the $25.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid); budget unreported, small-film terms
2020Lead$2,845,698
Nominated
no disclosed fee: modeled on the $25.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid); budget unreported, small-film terms
2020Lead$2,845,698
The Nearest Human Being
no disclosed fee: modeled on the $5.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid); budget unreported, small-film terms
2019Lead$2,657,292
Tuscaloosa
no disclosed fee: modeled on the $5.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid); budget unreported, small-film terms
2019Lead$2,657,292
Velvet Buzzsaw
no disclosed fee: modeled on the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3), capped at $3.2M
2019Lead$21,200,000$2,833,716
Yes, God, Yes
no disclosed fee: modeled on the $5.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid); budget unreported, small-film terms
2019Lead$2,657,292
After Her
soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.79): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $5.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid); budget unreported, small-film terms vs early terms
2018Lead$2,400,250
Mountain Rest
soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.79): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $5.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid); budget unreported, small-film terms vs early terms
2018Lead$2,400,250
Nominated
soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.79): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $5.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid); budget unreported, small-film terms vs early terms
2018Lead$2,400,250
The Postman's Dreams 2
soft-breakthrough supporting blend (w=0.66)
2017Supporting$438,859
Yes, God, Yes
soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.66): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $5.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid); budget unreported, small-film terms vs early terms
2017Lead$2,024,675
Long Nights Short Mornings
soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.50): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $5.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid); budget unreported, small-film terms vs early terms
2016Lead$1,562,500
Till Dark
soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.34): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $5.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid); budget unreported, small-film terms vs early terms
2015Lead$1,100,325
After Darkness
soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.21): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $5.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid); budget unreported, small-film terms vs early terms
2014Lead$724,750
I Believe in Unicorns
soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.21): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $5.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid); budget unreported, small-film terms vs early terms
2014Lead$724,750
The City at Night
soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.21): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $5.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid); budget unreported, small-film terms vs early terms
2014Lead$724,750
Don't Let Me Go
no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $5.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid) (pre-stardom rate); budget unreported, small-film terms; soft-breakthrough weight 0.12
2013Lead$467,708
Blue Like Jazz
no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $5.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid) (pre-stardom rate); soft-breakthrough weight 0.06
2012Lead$1,200,000$595,018$128,573
The Greening of Whitney Brown
no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $5.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid) (pre-stardom rate); budget unreported, small-film terms; soft-breakthrough weight 0.03
2011Lead$224,030
Too Sunny for Santa
no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $5.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid) (pre-stardom rate); budget unreported, small-film terms; soft-breakthrough weight 0.02
2010Lead$176,710
Hannah Montana: The Movie
no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $19.4M shrunk median for 2000s/mid (n=2) (pre-stardom rate); soft-breakthrough weight 0.01
2009Lead$30,000,000$169,200,000$521,784
Titanic
no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $20.0M shrunk median for 2000s/blockbuster (n=1) (pre-stardom rate); soft-breakthrough weight 0.01
2009Lead$200,000,000$1,850,197,130$681,661
To Kill a Mockingbird
no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $18.8M median for its era and nearest band (mid) (pre-stardom rate), capped at 15% of budget; soft-breakthrough weight 0.00
2004Lead$2,000,000$13,100,000$300,000

Comment fonctionnent les figures modélisées. An undisclosed lead role after the breakthrough gets the median of disclosed lead salaries for its era and budget band, capped at 15% of the film’s budget. Supporting and pre-breakthrough roles get 2.5% of that median, the documented going rate for actors before stardom. Films with no reported budget are treated as small productions. Undocumented backend, endorsements, and producer or director credits enter as separate estimated lines in the calculation above, built from disclosed medians. Every median comes from the published tables on our page méthodologie.

Patrimoine net Over Time

$10M$20M$30M20042009201420192026$32.9 Million2004: $30,6982005: $32,1812006: $34,6862007: $36,6232008: $71,0552009: $220,3272010: $539,4082011: $865,1292012: $1,235,5032013: $1,791,3822014: $2,519,3942015: $3,073,6942016: $4,995,0152017: $7,551,6322018: $10,776,9502019: $15,320,4412020: $18,151,9272021: $20,782,4252022: $20,504,2922023: $26,629,1612024: $29,431,2282025: $32,247,7352026: $32,902,383

Solde modélisé à la fin de chaque année, correspondant au tableau année par année ci-dessous.

Année par année

Natalia Dyer year by year model
YearIncomeFrais de représentationTaux d'impositionSpentSavedBalance
2026$36,045$5,40745%$15,220$1,631$32,902,383
2025$3,206,204$480,93145%$826,194$672,706$32,247,735
2024$3,206,204$480,93145%$826,194$672,706$29,431,228
2023$20,444,295$3,066,64445%$5,268,209$4,289,499$26,629,161
2022$5,423,268$813,49045%$1,397,500$1,137,878$20,504,292
2021$5,252,902$787,93545%$1,353,599$1,102,132$20,782,425
2020$8,069,603$1,210,44045%$2,079,424$1,693,116$18,151,927
2019$16,189,022$2,428,35345%$4,171,684$3,396,683$15,320,441
2018$15,162,078$2,274,31245%$3,907,055$3,181,216$10,776,950
2017$10,764,574$1,614,68647%$2,673,012$2,176,429$7,551,632
2016$8,712,685$1,306,90347%$2,163,496$1,761,569$4,995,015
2015$2,438,853$365,82847%$605,605$493,098$3,073,694
2014$3,059,728$458,95947%$759,778$618,629$2,519,394
2013$2,187,327$328,09947%$543,147$442,243$1,791,382
2012$1,437,617$215,64343%$383,925$312,601$1,235,503
2011$1,402,696$210,40443%$374,599$305,007$865,129
2010$1,398,210$209,73143%$373,401$304,032$539,408
2009$903,206$135,48143%$295,120$142,484$220,327
2008$368,815$55,32243%$140,951$37,740$71,055
2007$7,781$1,16743%$3,405$365$36,623
2006$7,781$1,16743%$3,405$365$34,686
2005$7,781$1,16743%$3,405$365$32,181
2004$300,000$45,00043%$114,652$30,698$30,698

Model Notes

  • PROCURATION DE RÉSIDENCE : résidence non recherchée individuellement pour ce lot ; US-CA par défaut appliqué jusqu'à ce que documenté
  • salary comps: 2 disclosed lead fee(s) flagged as non-market outliers (scale / far-below-quote) and excluded from era medians
  • Crédit image : Wikimedia Commons via Wikipedia (Natalia Dyer)
Reproduisez ce numéro. Une estimation de la valeur nette doit être reproductible de la même manière qu’une découverte scientifique : les mêmes contributions publiques et les mêmes tarifs publiés doivent toujours donner la même réponse. Les budgets des films et le box-office sont des rapports publics. Chaque salaire divulgué, taux de commission, taux d'imposition, taux d'épargne et rendement de référence est publié avec des citations sur notre page méthodologie. Undisclosed lead roles use the median of disclosed salaries for their era and budget band, capped at 15% of the film’s budget. Supporting and early-career roles use the documented pre-stardom fraction of that median. Undocumented backend, endorsements, and hyphenate credits enter as estimated lines from disclosed medians. Apply the rates year by year as shown above and you will land on $32.9 Million.

Méthodologie

We rebuild Natalia’s career as a yearly time series. Disclosed salaries and documented backend enter as reported, with citations. Undisclosed lead roles get the median of disclosed salaries for their era and budget band, capped at 15% of the film’s budget. Supporting roles and roles from before the breakthrough get 2.5% of that median, the going-rate ratio measured from disclosed pre-stardom deals. Films with no reported budget are treated as small productions, and every role is estimated unless a source documents it was unpaid. Representation fees come out at sourced rates, taxes follow the eras actually lived through, spending follows measured household savings behavior unless court documents say otherwise, and what remains compounds at real market returns. Undocumented backend enters as an expected value from disclosed deals, endorsements at the median disclosed ambassador fee, and producer or director credits at union-scale floors.

Le modèle complet, chaque tableau de taux et la façon dont nos estimations ont été comparées aux offres réelles sont disponibles. page méthodologie.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Natalia Dyer's net worth in 2026?

As of 2026, Natalia Dyer's net worth is an estimated $32.9 Million. The estimate is built film by film from disclosed salaries and documented backend, then year by year: income, minus representation fees and taxes, minus spending, compounded at real market returns.

How does Natalia Dyer make money?

Salaires des films et participation backend documentée.

How is Natalia Dyer's net worth calculated?

Disclosed paydays enter as reported, with citations. Undisclosed lead roles use the median of disclosed salaries for their era and budget band, capped at 15% of the film's budget, and supporting or early-career roles use the documented pre-stardom fraction of that median. We subtract sourced representation fees, taxes for the years Natalia actually worked, and spending from measured savings behavior, then compound at real market returns. Undocumented backend, endorsements, and producing credits enter as estimated lines from disclosed medians. Every rate and source is published.

How much does Natalia Dyer make per film?

Cela varie selon le rôle et l'époque, et le tableau film par film ci-dessus répertorie les rémunérations comptabilisées pour chaque titre. Les jours de paie divulgués entrent tels que déclarés. Les rôles non divulgués sont calqués sur ce que des acteurs comparables ont gagné à la même époque et dans la même fourchette budgétaire, les rôles principaux après la percée gagnant le plus et les rôles de soutien ou les premiers rôles une fraction documentée de ce montant.

Pourquoi le taux d'imposition est-il si élevé et les acteurs ne l'évitent-ils pas en faisant appel à une société de prêt ?

Tax comes out at the effective rate for where Natalia lived each year, which is the rate shown in the year-by-year table. In a high-tax state like California, combined federal and state income tax reaches close to half of a top earner's income, so those years run in the mid-40s percent. A loan-out company, the corporation many actors run their income through, does not lower the tax on the money they take home. Its real advantage is deducting business costs such as agent, manager, and attorney fees, and the model already subtracts those as a separate line before any tax is applied. High-earning performers also fall outside the pass-through business deduction that other company owners can claim, so it buys them no rate cut.

Pourquoi ce chiffre est-il différent de celui des autres sites à valeur nette ?

Most sites publish a single number with no way to check it. This estimate is built in the open: every salary, rate, and assumption is on the page, and the page méthodologie lists every source.

Quelle est la précision de cette estimation ?

Aucune estimation de la valeur nette d’un particulier n’est exacte ; celui-ci est un modèle construit à partir de données publiques. La différence est que vous pouvez voir comment il a été construit et vérifier chaque étape. Le niveau de confiance situé en haut du calcul indique dans quelle mesure le chiffre repose sur des chiffres divulgués, et la page indique où un chiffre s'appuie sur une hypothèse.

Is Natalia Dyer rich compared to the average person?

Yes. A net worth of $32.9 Million is far above the median American household, which sits near $193,000 according to Federal Reserve data.

What is Natalia Dyer's biggest source of wealth?

On this page it is film salaries, the largest line in the calculation at $37.7 Million. The full breakdown, with every other line and its source, is above.

How much does Natalia Dyer make from endorsements?

The model counts $16.0 Million in career endorsement income for Natalia: 1 named partnerships x the $4.0M annual fee from the median disclosed film deal x a 4-year term, spread across the deal years. It is an estimate, since the individual deal values are not all public, and it sits as its own line in the calculation above.

Explorez d'autres acteurs

À propos de NetWorth Explained

We originally created NWE because nobody in the public-figure net worth space showed their work. Magazines and sites threw out big numbers while hiding behind vague claims of “proprietary algorithms” ou “insider knowledge.” That’s why we started the world’s only publication that transparently showed every assumption, every variable, and every calculation. We’re still the only ones who do it this way. En savoir plus sur NetWorth Explained.