Tobey Maguire Patrimoine net 2026
Dernière mise à jour August 3, 2026
As of 2026, Tobey Maguire has an estimated net worth of $219.0 Million, computed film by film and year by year from public records and published rates. Every input, rate, and source behind the number is on this page.
Calculation
- Salaires divulgués et backend documenté, chacun avec une citation
- Rôles non divulgués modélisés à partir de comparables divulgués pour leur époque, leur tranche budgétaire et leur étape de carrière
- Backend, avenants et crédits de production estimés à partir des médianes divulguées

Fast Facts
| Birthdate | June 27, 1975 |
|---|---|
| Birthplace | Santa Monica |
| Breakthrough | Spider-Man (2002) |
| Best Known | Spider-Man (2002) |
Who Is Tobey Maguire?
Tobey Maguire was born June 27, 1975 in Santa Monica, best known for Spider-Man (2002). The earnings behind Tobey's net worth come from film salaries, backend participation, endorsement deals, and the Material Pictures producing equity.
The model tracks Tobey's earning years from 1989 to 2026, with the biggest single year in 2007 at about $56.4 Million of gross income. After representation fees, taxes, and living costs, what stays invested compounds at market returns into an estimated $219.0 Million today.
Data
Chaque ligne ci-dessous est calculée à partir des données publiques et des tableaux de tarifs publiés sur notre page méthodologie. Confiance: Catégorie C. Les chiffres documentés ne couvrent qu’une petite partie de ce chiffre, de sorte que la majeure partie est modélisée à partir de taux publiés et de comparables (les notes vont de A, principalement documentées, à C, principalement modélisées).
The Calculation
| Line | Amount |
|---|---|
| Revenue | |
| Film pay, modeled lead roles (13 of 45 films) era and budget-band medians of disclosed lead salaries (winsorized, thin cells shrunk toward the era median), blended with this actor's disclosed quote history when available; soft breakthrough blend near the career break year | $125,866,083 |
| Film pay, modeled post-breakthrough supporting roles (4 of 45 films) 12.0% of lead cells: lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio | $9,587,165 |
| Film pay, modeled supporting and early roles (28 of 45 films) 2,5% des médianes de l'époque : le taux de pré-célébrité | $15,806,980 |
| Points back-end, estimés 12% of disclosed lead deals included points, at a median 2.6% of box office; expected value on 9 commercially viable undisclosed lead roles; cash spread over 3 years; 1 film(s) used band-specific box-office/budget multiples as a gross proxy | $15,551,292 |
| Approbations, estimées (1 partenariat de marque) 1 named partnerships x the $4.0M annual fee from the median disclosed film deal x a 4-year term, spread across the deal years | $16,000,000 |
| Résidus, estimés SAG residual rates on post-theatrical receipts assumed at half of box office, split by role share and spread over the ten years after each release; 18 film(s) used band-specific box-office proxies | $38,400,079 |
| Spider-Man trilogy backend (modeled) Lead on three Spider-Man films with widely reported backend participation; modeled as multi-year backend income rather than a single disclosed total. (variety.com) | $105,000,000 |
| Retour sur investissement de l'épargne mixed portfolio: 55% actual 60/40 securities returns (taxed) + 45% US long-run home-price rate on the rest | $101,209,743 |
| Material Pictures producing equity (modeled) equity, estimated Long-running producing career via Material Pictures; $50M models retained producing equity and fees capitalized.; $50,000,000 x 100% stake (en.wikipedia.org) | $50,000,000 |
| Expenses | |
| Frais de représentation agent 10% + avocat 5% | -$47,902,496 |
| Taxes Taux effectifs US-CA, année par année | -$119,534,703 |
| Dépenses personnelles measured household savings rates by income, times a 88% entertainment-household factor | -$84,118,925 |
| Valeur nette estimée | $219,003,590 |
Film par film
| Film | Year | Role | Budget | Billetterie | Salaire compté |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Extrapolations no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $23.8M shrunk median for 2020s/large (n=2) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio) | 2023 | Supporting | $70,000,000 | – | $2,849,998 |
| Spider-Man: Across the Spider-Verse no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $16.4M shrunk median for 2020s/tentpole (n=5) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio) | 2023 | Supporting | $100,000,000 | $690,800,000 | $1,971,427 |
| Babylon no disclosed fee: modeled on the $23.8M shrunk median for 2020s/large (n=2), capped at $11.8M | 2022 | Lead | $79,000,000 | $64,900,000 | $11,849,982 |
| Spider-Man : Pas de chemin à la maison no disclosed fee: modeled on the $18.0M shrunk median for 2020s/blockbuster (n=8) | 2021 | Lead | $200,000,000 | $1,921,847,111 | $17,999,945 |
| The Boss Baby no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $20.0M shrunk median for 2010s/tentpole (n=12) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio) | 2017 | Supporting | $125,000,000 | $528,000,000 | $2,399,914 |
| Pawn Sacrifice no disclosed fee: modeled on the $5.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid), capped at $2.9M | 2014 | Lead | $19,000,000 | $5,600,000 | $2,849,086 |
| The Spoils of Babylon no disclosed fee: modeled on the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3), capped at $6.0M | 2014 | Lead | $40,000,000 | – | $5,998,080 |
| Labor Day no disclosed fee: modeled on the $5.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid), capped at $2.7M | 2013 | Lead | $18,000,000 | $20,275,812 | $2,698,319 |
| The Great Gatsby no disclosed fee: modeled on the $20.0M shrunk median for 2010s/tentpole (n=12) | 2013 | Lead | $147,500,000 | $353,600,000 | $19,987,267 |
| The Details no disclosed fee: modeled on the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3), capped at $6.0M | 2011 | Lead | $40,000,000 | $63,595 | $5,985,844 |
| Frères no disclosed fee: modeled on the $19.4M shrunk median for 2000s/mid (n=2), capped at $3.9M | 2009 | Lead | $26,000,000 | $43,500,000 | $3,868,180 |
| Tropic Thunder no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $20.0M shrunk median for 2000s/large (n=18) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio) | 2008 | Supporting | $92,000,000 | $195,702,963 | $2,365,826 |
| Spider-Man 3 no disclosed fee: modeled on the $20.0M shrunk median for 2000s/blockbuster (n=1) | 2007 | Lead | $304,000,000 | $895,900,000 | $19,328,319 |
| The Good German no disclosed fee: modeled on the $19.4M shrunk median for 2000s/mid (n=2), capped at $4.8M | 2006 | Lead | $32,000,000 | $6,000,000 | $4,519,617 |
| Spider-Man 2 soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.79): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $20.0M shrunk median for 2000s/blockbuster (n=1) vs early terms | 2004 | Lead | $200,000,000 | $797,000,000 | $15,932,134 |
| Seabiscuit soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.66): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $20.0M shrunk median for 2000s/large (n=18), capped at $13.1M vs early terms | 2003 | Lead | $87,000,000 | $148,300,000 | $8,792,492 |
| Spider-Man soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.50): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $11.8M shrunk median for 2000s/tentpole (n=9) vs early terms | 2002 | Lead | $139,000,000 | $826,800,000 | $6,056,818 |
| Cats & Dogs soft-breakthrough supporting blend (w=0.34) | 2001 | Supporting | $60,000,000 | $200,700,000 | $1,144,563 |
| Don's Plum soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.34): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $19.4M shrunk median for 2000s/mid (n=2), capped at $6.0M vs early terms | 2001 | Lead | $40,000,000 | $5,640 | $2,355,516 |
| Wonder Boys soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.21): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $20.0M shrunk median for 2000s/large (n=18), capped at $8.2M vs early terms | 2000 | Lead | $55,000,000 | $33,400,000 | $2,116,716 |
| Ride with the Devil no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $14.4M shrunk median for 1990s/mid (n=6) (pre-stardom rate); soft-breakthrough weight 0.12 | 1999 | Lead | $38,000,000 | $635,096 | $995,993 |
| The Cider House Rules no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $14.4M shrunk median for 1990s/mid (n=6) (pre-stardom rate); soft-breakthrough weight 0.12 | 1999 | Lead | $24,000,000 | $88,500,000 | $745,667 |
| Fear and Loathing in Las Vegas no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $10.0M shrunk median for 1990s/small (n=1) (pre-stardom rate); soft-breakthrough weight 0.06 | 1998 | Lead | $18,500,000 | $13,700,000 | $414,047 |
| Pleasantville no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $14.6M shrunk median for 1990s/large (n=3) (pre-stardom rate); soft-breakthrough weight 0.06 | 1998 | Lead | $60,000,000 | $49,800,000 | $926,009 |
| Deconstructing Harry no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $14.4M shrunk median for 1990s/mid (n=6) (pre-stardom rate); soft-breakthrough weight 0.03 | 1997 | Lead | $20,000,000 | $10,700,000 | $450,332 |
| Joyride no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $14.4M shrunk median for 1990s/mid (n=6) (pre-stardom rate); soft-breakthrough weight 0.03 | 1997 | Lead | $26,000,000 | – | $481,333 |
| The Ice Storm no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $10.0M shrunk median for 1990s/small (n=1) (pre-stardom rate); soft-breakthrough weight 0.03 | 1997 | Lead | $18,000,000 | $16,000,000 | $334,391 |
| Duke of Groove no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $14.4M shrunk median for 1990s/mid (n=6) (pre-stardom rate); soft-breakthrough weight 0.02 | 1996 | Lead | $26,000,000 | – | $423,057 |
| Seduced by Madness no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $14.4M shrunk median for 1990s/mid (n=6) (pre-stardom rate); soft-breakthrough weight 0.02 | 1996 | Lead | $26,000,000 | – | $423,057 |
| A Child's Cry for Help no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $14.4M shrunk median for 1990s/mid (n=6) (pre-stardom rate); soft-breakthrough weight 0.00 | 1994 | Lead | $26,000,000 | – | $376,387 |
| Healer no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $14.4M shrunk median for 1990s/mid (n=6) (pre-stardom rate); soft-breakthrough weight 0.00 | 1994 | Lead | $26,000,000 | – | $376,387 |
| Revenge of the Red Baron no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $14.4M shrunk median for 1990s/mid (n=6) (pre-stardom rate); soft-breakthrough weight 0.00 | 1994 | Lead | $26,000,000 | – | $376,387 |
| S.F.W. no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $2.0M median for its era and nearest band (small) (pre-stardom rate), capped at 15% of budget; soft-breakthrough weight 0.00 | 1994 | Lead | $63,513 | $63,513 | $9,527 |
| Spoils of War no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $14.4M shrunk median for 1990s/mid (n=6) (pre-stardom rate); soft-breakthrough weight 0.00 | 1994 | Lead | $26,000,000 | – | $376,387 |
| Walker, Texas Ranger no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $14.4M shrunk median for 1990s/mid (n=6) (pre-stardom rate); soft-breakthrough weight 0.00 | 1994 | Lead | $26,000,000 | – | $376,387 |
| This Boy's Life no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $14.4M shrunk median for 1990s/mid (n=6) (pre-stardom rate); soft-breakthrough weight 0.00 | 1993 | Lead | $26,000,000 | $4,099,999 | $368,130 |
| Great Scott! no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $14.4M shrunk median for 1990s/mid (n=6) (pre-stardom rate); soft-breakthrough weight 0.00 | 1992 | Lead | $26,000,000 | – | $363,875 |
| Wild & Crazy Kids no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $14.4M shrunk median for 1990s/mid (n=6) (pre-stardom rate) | 1992 | Supporting | $26,000,000 | – | $361,111 |
| Eerie, Indiana no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $14.4M shrunk median for 1990s/mid (n=6) (pre-stardom rate); soft-breakthrough weight 0.00 | 1991 | Lead | $26,000,000 | – | $361,687 |
| Roseanne no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $14.4M shrunk median for 1990s/mid (n=6) (pre-stardom rate); soft-breakthrough weight 0.00 | 1991 | Lead | $26,000,000 | – | $361,687 |
| 1st & Ten no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $14.4M shrunk median for 1990s/mid (n=6) (pre-stardom rate); soft-breakthrough weight 0.00 | 1990 | Lead | $26,000,000 | – | $360,562 |
| Blossom no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $14.4M shrunk median for 1990s/mid (n=6) (pre-stardom rate); soft-breakthrough weight 0.00 | 1990 | Lead | $26,000,000 | – | $360,562 |
| Tales from the Whoop: Hot Rod Brown Class Clown no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $14.4M shrunk median for 1990s/mid (n=6) (pre-stardom rate); soft-breakthrough weight 0.00 | 1990 | Lead | $26,000,000 | – | $360,562 |
| Rodney Dangerfield: Opening Night at Rodney's Place no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $4.1M shrunk median for pre1990/small (n=2) (pre-stardom rate); soft-breakthrough weight 0.00 | 1989 | Lead | $14,000,000 | – | $103,469 |
| The Wizard no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $4.1M shrunk median for pre1990/small (n=2) (pre-stardom rate) | 1989 | Supporting | $6,000,000 | $14,300,000 | $103,192 |
Comment fonctionnent les figures modélisées. An undisclosed lead role after the breakthrough gets the median of disclosed lead salaries for its era and budget band, capped at 15% of the film’s budget. Supporting and pre-breakthrough roles get 2.5% of that median, the documented going rate for actors before stardom. Films with no reported budget are treated as small productions. Undocumented backend, endorsements, and producer or director credits enter as separate estimated lines in the calculation above, built from disclosed medians. Every median comes from the published tables on our page méthodologie.
Patrimoine net Over Time
Solde modélisé à la fin de chaque année, correspondant au tableau année par année ci-dessous.
Année par année
| Year | Income | Frais de représentation | Taux d'imposition | Spent | Saved | Balance |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | $1,377,075 | $206,561 | 45% | $434,167 | $209,616 | $219,003,590 |
| 2025 | $1,377,075 | $206,561 | 45% | $434,167 | $209,616 | $165,443,738 |
| 2024 | $1,421,910 | $213,287 | 45% | $448,303 | $216,440 | $154,015,481 |
| 2023 | $6,860,297 | $1,029,045 | 45% | $1,767,802 | $1,439,386 | $142,411,332 |
| 2022 | $13,188,163 | $1,978,224 | 45% | $3,398,405 | $2,767,061 | $129,390,049 |
| 2021 | $18,460,165 | $2,769,025 | 45% | $4,756,926 | $3,873,201 | $135,881,257 |
| 2020 | $5,742,971 | $861,446 | 45% | $1,479,883 | $1,204,956 | $121,756,353 |
| 2019 | $368,826 | $55,324 | 45% | $136,010 | $36,416 | $112,213,487 |
| 2018 | $397,007 | $59,551 | 45% | $146,402 | $39,199 | $101,388,063 |
| 2017 | $2,533,080 | $379,962 | 47% | $629,003 | $512,149 | $100,760,423 |
| 2016 | $1,648,026 | $247,204 | 47% | $409,231 | $333,205 | $93,157,714 |
| 2015 | $1,309,782 | $196,467 | 47% | $325,239 | $264,818 | $88,238,406 |
| 2014 | $7,931,382 | $1,189,707 | 47% | $1,969,486 | $1,603,602 | $85,887,174 |
| 2013 | $20,067,085 | $3,010,063 | 47% | $4,982,970 | $4,057,252 | $79,433,371 |
| 2012 | $8,448,090 | $1,267,213 | 43% | $2,256,116 | $1,836,983 | $69,027,299 |
| 2011 | $5,905,785 | $885,868 | 43% | $1,577,178 | $1,284,175 | $62,984,229 |
| 2010 | $3,531,287 | $529,693 | 43% | $943,053 | $767,856 | $59,418,388 |
| 2009 | $5,385,089 | $807,763 | 43% | $1,438,122 | $1,170,953 | $54,900,486 |
| 2008 | $20,459,019 | $3,068,853 | 43% | $5,463,712 | $4,448,683 | $49,044,272 |
| 2007 | $56,392,733 | $8,458,910 | 43% | $15,060,040 | $12,262,239 | $49,022,303 |
| 2006 | $11,064,810 | $1,659,721 | 43% | $2,954,928 | $2,405,972 | $35,165,990 |
| 2005 | $17,609,883 | $2,641,482 | 43% | $4,702,832 | $3,829,156 | $30,717,569 |
| 2004 | $42,912,184 | $6,436,828 | 43% | $11,459,973 | $9,330,980 | $25,943,548 |
| 2003 | $21,794,676 | $3,269,201 | 43% | $5,820,408 | $4,739,113 | $15,756,629 |
| 2002 | $22,128,799 | $3,319,320 | 46% | $5,598,604 | $4,558,515 | $10,034,111 |
| 2001 | $4,699,266 | $704,890 | 46% | $1,188,918 | $968,045 | $5,645,701 |
| 2000 | $3,024,993 | $453,749 | 46% | $765,326 | $623,146 | $4,679,668 |
| 1999 | $2,306,088 | $345,913 | 46% | $583,442 | $475,052 | $3,993,445 |
| 1998 | $1,874,730 | $281,209 | 46% | $474,308 | $386,193 | $3,285,186 |
| 1997 | $1,659,607 | $248,941 | 46% | $419,882 | $341,878 | $2,622,793 |
| 1996 | $1,289,488 | $193,423 | 46% | $326,241 | $265,633 | $2,038,798 |
| 1995 | $571,225 | $85,684 | 46% | $176,822 | $85,370 | $1,643,515 |
| 1994 | $1,506,472 | $225,971 | 46% | $381,139 | $310,332 | $1,372,188 |
| 1993 | $1,005,143 | $150,771 | 46% | $254,302 | $207,059 | $1,042,916 |
| 1992 | $981,917 | $147,288 | 36% | $294,431 | $239,732 | $789,620 |
| 1991 | $815,905 | $122,386 | 36% | $244,651 | $199,201 | $524,081 |
| 1990 | $1,093,276 | $163,991 | 36% | $327,822 | $266,920 | $291,302 |
| 1989 | $206,661 | $30,999 | 36% | $88,680 | $23,744 | $23,744 |
Model Notes
- PROCURATION DE RÉSIDENCE : résidence non recherchée individuellement pour ce lot ; US-CA par défaut appliqué jusqu'à ce que documenté
- salary comps: 2 disclosed lead fee(s) flagged as non-market outliers (scale / far-below-quote) and excluded from era medians
- Crédit image : Wikimedia Commons via Wikipedia (Tobey Maguire)
Méthodologie
We rebuild Tobey’s career as a yearly time series. Disclosed salaries and documented backend enter as reported, with citations. Undisclosed lead roles get the median of disclosed salaries for their era and budget band, capped at 15% of the film’s budget. Supporting roles and roles from before the breakthrough get 2.5% of that median, the going-rate ratio measured from disclosed pre-stardom deals. Films with no reported budget are treated as small productions, and every role is estimated unless a source documents it was unpaid. Representation fees come out at sourced rates, taxes follow the eras actually lived through, spending follows measured household savings behavior unless court documents say otherwise, and what remains compounds at real market returns. Undocumented backend enters as an expected value from disclosed deals, endorsements at the median disclosed ambassador fee, and producer or director credits at union-scale floors.
Le modèle complet, chaque tableau de taux et la façon dont nos estimations ont été comparées aux offres réelles sont disponibles. page méthodologie.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is Tobey Maguire's net worth in 2026?
As of 2026, Tobey Maguire's net worth is an estimated $219.0 Million. The estimate is built film by film from disclosed salaries and documented backend, then year by year: income, minus representation fees and taxes, minus spending, compounded at real market returns.
How does Tobey Maguire make money?
Salaires des films et participation backend documentée.
How is Tobey Maguire's net worth calculated?
Disclosed paydays enter as reported, with citations. Undisclosed lead roles use the median of disclosed salaries for their era and budget band, capped at 15% of the film's budget, and supporting or early-career roles use the documented pre-stardom fraction of that median. We subtract sourced representation fees, taxes for the years Tobey actually worked, and spending from measured savings behavior, then compound at real market returns. Undocumented backend, endorsements, and producing credits enter as estimated lines from disclosed medians. Every rate and source is published.
How much does Tobey Maguire make per film?
Cela varie selon le rôle et l'époque, et le tableau film par film ci-dessus répertorie les rémunérations comptabilisées pour chaque titre. Les jours de paie divulgués entrent tels que déclarés. Les rôles non divulgués sont calqués sur ce que des acteurs comparables ont gagné à la même époque et dans la même fourchette budgétaire, les rôles principaux après la percée gagnant le plus et les rôles de soutien ou les premiers rôles une fraction documentée de ce montant.
Pourquoi le taux d'imposition est-il si élevé et les acteurs ne l'évitent-ils pas en faisant appel à une société de prêt ?
Tax comes out at the effective rate for where Tobey lived each year, which is the rate shown in the year-by-year table. In a high-tax state like California, combined federal and state income tax reaches close to half of a top earner's income, so those years run in the mid-40s percent. A loan-out company, the corporation many actors run their income through, does not lower the tax on the money they take home. Its real advantage is deducting business costs such as agent, manager, and attorney fees, and the model already subtracts those as a separate line before any tax is applied. High-earning performers also fall outside the pass-through business deduction that other company owners can claim, so it buys them no rate cut.
Pourquoi ce chiffre est-il différent de celui des autres sites à valeur nette ?
Most sites publish a single number with no way to check it. This estimate is built in the open: every salary, rate, and assumption is on the page, and the page méthodologie lists every source.
Quelle est la précision de cette estimation ?
Aucune estimation de la valeur nette d’un particulier n’est exacte ; celui-ci est un modèle construit à partir de données publiques. La différence est que vous pouvez voir comment il a été construit et vérifier chaque étape. Le niveau de confiance situé en haut du calcul indique dans quelle mesure le chiffre repose sur des chiffres divulgués, et la page indique où un chiffre s'appuie sur une hypothèse.
Is Tobey Maguire rich compared to the average person?
Yes. A net worth of $219.0 Million is far above the median American household, which sits near $193,000 according to Federal Reserve data.
What is Tobey Maguire's biggest source of wealth?
On this page it is film salaries, the largest line in the calculation at $125.9 Million. The full breakdown, with every other line and its source, is above.
How much does Tobey Maguire make from endorsements?
The model counts $16.0 Million in career endorsement income for Tobey: 1 named partnerships x the $4.0M annual fee from the median disclosed film deal x a 4-year term, spread across the deal years. It is an estimate, since the individual deal values are not all public, and it sits as its own line in the calculation above.
What businesses does Tobey Maguire own?
The stake counted on this page is Material Pictures producing equity. It is valued from a reported transaction or a revenue multiple, and shown as its own line in the calculation above with the basis next to it.
Explorez d'autres acteurs
À propos de NetWorth Explained
We originally created NWE because nobody in the public-figure net worth space showed their work. Magazines and sites threw out big numbers while hiding behind vague claims of “proprietary algorithms” ou “insider knowledge.” That’s why we started the world’s only publication that transparently showed every assumption, every variable, and every calculation. We’re still the only ones who do it this way. En savoir plus sur NetWorth Explained.