$91.6 Million

Tom Hiddleston Patrimoine net 2026

Dernière mise à jour August 3, 2026

As of 2026, Tom Hiddleston has an estimated net worth of $91.6 Million, computed film by film and year by year from public records and published rates. Every input, rate, and source behind the number is on this page.

Calculation

  • Salaires divulgués et backend documenté, chacun avec une citation
  • Rôles non divulgués modélisés à partir de comparables divulgués pour leur époque, leur tranche budgétaire et leur étape de carrière
  • Backend, avenants et crédits de production estimés à partir des médianes divulguées
Tom Hiddleston

Fast Facts

BirthdateFebruary 9, 1981
BirthplaceWestminster
BreakthroughThor (2011)
Best KnownThe Avengers (2012)

Who Is Tom Hiddleston?

Tom Hiddleston was born February 9, 1981 in Westminster, best known for The Avengers (2012). The earnings behind Tom's net worth come from film salaries, backend participation, and endorsement deals.

The model tracks Tom's earning years from 2001 to 2026, with the biggest single year in 2017 at about $32.8 Million of gross income. After representation fees, taxes, and living costs, what stays invested compounds at market returns into an estimated $91.6 Million today.

Data

Chaque ligne ci-dessous est calculée à partir des données publiques et des tableaux de tarifs publiés sur notre page méthodologie. Confiance: Catégorie C. Les chiffres documentés ne couvrent qu’une petite partie de ce chiffre, de sorte que la majeure partie est modélisée à partir de taux publiés et de comparables (les notes vont de A, principalement documentées, à C, principalement modélisées).

The Calculation

Tom Hiddleston net worth line items
LineAmount
Revenue
Film pay, modeled lead roles (14 of 26 films)
era and budget-band medians of disclosed lead salaries (winsorized, thin cells shrunk toward the era median), blended with this actor's disclosed quote history when available; soft breakthrough blend near the career break year
$127,435,034
Film pay, modeled supporting and early roles (12 of 26 films)
2,5% des médianes de l'époque : le taux de pré-célébrité
$10,361,999
Points back-end, estimés
12% of disclosed lead deals included points, at a median 2.6% of box office; expected value on 10 commercially viable undisclosed lead roles; cash spread over 3 years
$27,912,713
Approbations, estimées (1 partenariat de marque)
1 named partnerships x the $4.0M annual fee from the median disclosed film deal x a 4-year term, spread across the deal years
$16,000,000
Résidus, estimés
SAG residual rates on post-theatrical receipts assumed at half of box office, split by role share and spread over the ten years after each release; 12 film(s) used band-specific box-office proxies
$58,464,366
Retour sur investissement de l'épargne
mixed portfolio: 55% actual 60/40 securities returns (taxed) + 45% US long-run home-price rate on the rest
$38,749,829
Expenses
Frais de représentation
agent 10% + avocat 5%
-$34,771,566
Taxes
Taux effectifs au Royaume-Uni, année par année
-$78,815,550
Dépenses personnelles
measured household savings rates by income, times a 88% entertainment-household factor
-$65,333,674
Valeur nette estimée$91,639,479

Film par film

Tom Hiddleston film-by-film pay
FilmYearRoleBudgetBilletterieSalaire compté
The Life of Chuck
no disclosed fee: modeled on the $23.8M shrunk median for 2020s/large (n=2), capped at $10.5M
2024Lead$70,000,000$21,300,000$10,498,294
Avengers : Fin de partie
no disclosed fee: modeled on the $15.8M shrunk median for 2010s/blockbuster (n=11)
2019Lead$356,000,000$2,797,501,328$15,695,358
Avengers : guerre à l'infini
no disclosed fee: modeled on the $15.8M shrunk median for 2010s/blockbuster (n=11)
2018Lead$400,000,000$2,048,359,754$15,625,998
Kong: Skull Island
no disclosed fee: modeled on the $15.8M shrunk median for 2010s/blockbuster (n=11)
2017Lead$300,000,000$566,652,812$15,492,693
Thor: Ragnarok
no disclosed fee: modeled on the $20.0M shrunk median for 2010s/tentpole (n=12)
2017Lead$180,000,000$853,977,126$19,649,269
Crimson Peak
no disclosed fee: modeled on the $20.0M shrunk median for 2010s/large (n=8), capped at $8.2M
2015Lead$55,000,000$74,679,822$7,746,489
High-Rise (film)
no disclosed fee: modeled on the $5.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid), capped at $1.2M
2015Lead$8,000,000$4,099,999$1,130,158
I Saw the Light (film)
no disclosed fee: modeled on the $5.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid), capped at $1.9M
2015Lead$13,000,000$1,800,000$1,831,431
Only Lovers Left Alive
soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.79): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $5.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid), capped at $1.1M vs early terms
2013Lead$7,000,000$7,600,000$857,037
Thor: The Dark World
soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.79): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $20.0M shrunk median for 2010s/tentpole (n=12) vs early terms
2013Lead$170,000,000$644,783,140$15,932,134
The Avengers (2012 film)
soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.66): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $15.8M shrunk median for 2010s/blockbuster (n=11) vs early terms
2012Lead$220,000,000$1,518,812,988$10,553,360
The Deep Blue Sea (2011 film)
soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.66): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $5.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid), capped at $1.2M vs early terms
2012Lead$8,000,000$3,100,000$835,313
Midnight in Paris
soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.50): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $5.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid), capped at $2.5M vs early terms
2011Lead$17,000,000$151,100,000$1,337,500
Thor (film)
soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.50): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $20.0M shrunk median for 2010s/tentpole (n=12) vs early terms
2011Lead$150,000,000$449,326,618$10,250,000
Archipelago (2010 film)
soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.34): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3), capped at $6.0M vs early terms
2010Lead$40,000,000$2,217,170
Return to Cranford
soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.21): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $19.4M shrunk median for 2000s/mid (n=2), capped at $6.0M vs early terms
2009Lead$40,000,000$1,634,981
Ivanov (play)
no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $19.4M shrunk median for 2000s/mid (n=2) (pre-stardom rate); soft-breakthrough weight 0.12
2008Lead$40,000,000$1,141,854
Miss Austen Regrets
no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $19.4M shrunk median for 2000s/mid (n=2) (pre-stardom rate); soft-breakthrough weight 0.12
2008Lead$40,000,000$1,141,854
Othello
no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $19.4M shrunk median for 2000s/mid (n=2) (pre-stardom rate); soft-breakthrough weight 0.12
2008Lead$40,000,000$1,141,854
Cymbeline
no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $19.4M shrunk median for 2000s/mid (n=2) (pre-stardom rate); soft-breakthrough weight 0.06
2007Lead$40,000,000$842,721
Unrelated
no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $18.8M median for its era and nearest band (mid) (pre-stardom rate), capped at 15% of budget; soft-breakthrough weight 0.06
2007Lead$300,137$45,021
Suburban Shootout
no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $19.4M shrunk median for 2000s/mid (n=2) (pre-stardom rate); soft-breakthrough weight 0.03
2006Lead$40,000,000$674,362
Unrelated
no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $18.8M median for its era and nearest band (mid) (pre-stardom rate), capped at 15% of budget; soft-breakthrough weight 0.03
2006Lead$275,996$41,399
The Gathering Storm (2002 film)
no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $19.4M shrunk median for 2000s/mid (n=2) (pre-stardom rate); soft-breakthrough weight 0.00
2002Lead$40,000,000$498,013
Conspiracy (2001 film)
no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $19.4M shrunk median for 2000s/mid (n=2) (pre-stardom rate); soft-breakthrough weight 0.00
2001Lead$40,000,000$491,385
Nicholas Nickleby
no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $19.4M shrunk median for 2000s/mid (n=2) (pre-stardom rate); soft-breakthrough weight 0.00
2001Lead$40,000,000$491,385

Comment fonctionnent les figures modélisées. An undisclosed lead role after the breakthrough gets the median of disclosed lead salaries for its era and budget band, capped at 15% of the film’s budget. Supporting and pre-breakthrough roles get 2.5% of that median, the documented going rate for actors before stardom. Films with no reported budget are treated as small productions. Undocumented backend, endorsements, and producer or director credits enter as separate estimated lines in the calculation above, built from disclosed medians. Every median comes from the published tables on our page méthodologie.

Patrimoine net Over Time

$25M$50M$75M200120062011201620212026$91.6 Million2001: $259,1412002: $323,0072003: $355,7892004: $378,8392005: $427,9532006: $600,5532007: $1,040,2612008: $1,655,0282009: $2,315,0552010: $3,711,1702011: $7,644,1222012: $12,705,4342013: $18,560,5322014: $22,360,8372015: $25,241,2002016: $29,507,0382017: $39,392,3942018: $44,643,3602019: $54,581,7452020: $61,272,4312021: $68,661,2912022: $65,141,6152023: $73,031,7872024: $81,790,4612025: $88,982,6952026: $91,639,479

Solde modélisé à la fin de chaque année, correspondant au tableau année par année ci-dessous.

Année par année

Tom Hiddleston year by year model
YearIncomeFrais de représentationTaux d'impositionSpentSavedBalance
2026$3,734,948$560,24240%$1,049,939$854,885$91,639,479
2025$3,782,812$567,42240%$1,063,394$865,840$88,982,695
2024$11,118,966$1,667,84540%$3,125,675$2,544,998$81,790,461
2023$7,307,164$1,096,07540%$2,054,131$1,672,522$73,031,787
2022$5,061,692$759,25440%$1,422,902$1,158,561$65,141,615
2021$8,274,617$1,241,19340%$2,326,094$1,893,961$68,661,291
2020$10,407,518$1,561,12840%$2,925,678$2,382,156$61,272,431
2019$21,224,537$3,183,68040%$5,966,472$4,858,042$54,581,745
2018$21,936,120$3,290,41840%$6,166,507$5,020,915$44,643,360
2017$32,759,181$4,913,87740%$9,208,999$7,498,184$39,392,394
2016$12,605,800$1,890,87040%$3,543,642$2,885,316$29,507,038
2015$10,177,090$1,526,56440%$2,860,902$2,329,414$25,241,200
2014$11,368,331$1,705,25040%$3,195,774$2,602,075$22,360,837
2013$20,133,852$3,020,07840%$5,659,867$4,608,397$18,560,532
2012$19,861,659$2,979,24940%$5,583,351$4,546,095$12,705,434
2011$16,556,331$2,483,45040%$4,654,183$3,789,546$7,644,122
2010$5,402,199$810,33040%$1,518,623$1,236,499$3,711,170
2009$2,142,059$321,30940%$602,159$490,292$2,315,055
2008$3,096,282$464,44240%$870,402$708,702$1,655,028
2007$1,815,290$272,29440%$510,300$415,498$1,040,261
2006$891,881$133,78240%$306,757$148,102$600,553
2005$339,255$50,88840%$136,478$36,542$427,953
2004$124,526$18,67940%$57,361$6,148$378,839
2003$124,526$18,67940%$57,361$6,148$355,789
2002$431,627$64,74440%$148,455$71,674$323,007
2001$1,132,175$169,82640%$318,268$259,141$259,141

Model Notes

  • PROCURATION DE RÉSIDENCE : résidence non recherchée individuellement pour ce lot ; US-CA par défaut appliqué jusqu'à ce que documenté
  • salary comps: 2 disclosed lead fee(s) flagged as non-market outliers (scale / far-below-quote) and excluded from era medians
  • Crédit image : Wikimedia Commons via Wikipedia (Tom Hiddleston)
Reproduisez ce numéro. Une estimation de la valeur nette doit être reproductible de la même manière qu’une découverte scientifique : les mêmes contributions publiques et les mêmes tarifs publiés doivent toujours donner la même réponse. Les budgets des films et le box-office sont des rapports publics. Chaque salaire divulgué, taux de commission, taux d'imposition, taux d'épargne et rendement de référence est publié avec des citations sur notre page méthodologie. Undisclosed lead roles use the median of disclosed salaries for their era and budget band, capped at 15% of the film’s budget. Supporting and early-career roles use the documented pre-stardom fraction of that median. Undocumented backend, endorsements, and hyphenate credits enter as estimated lines from disclosed medians. Apply the rates year by year as shown above and you will land on $91.6 Million.

Méthodologie

We rebuild Tom’s career as a yearly time series. Disclosed salaries and documented backend enter as reported, with citations. Undisclosed lead roles get the median of disclosed salaries for their era and budget band, capped at 15% of the film’s budget. Supporting roles and roles from before the breakthrough get 2.5% of that median, the going-rate ratio measured from disclosed pre-stardom deals. Films with no reported budget are treated as small productions, and every role is estimated unless a source documents it was unpaid. Representation fees come out at sourced rates, taxes follow the eras actually lived through, spending follows measured household savings behavior unless court documents say otherwise, and what remains compounds at real market returns. Undocumented backend enters as an expected value from disclosed deals, endorsements at the median disclosed ambassador fee, and producer or director credits at union-scale floors.

Le modèle complet, chaque tableau de taux et la façon dont nos estimations ont été comparées aux offres réelles sont disponibles. page méthodologie.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Tom Hiddleston's net worth in 2026?

As of 2026, Tom Hiddleston's net worth is an estimated $91.6 Million. The estimate is built film by film from disclosed salaries and documented backend, then year by year: income, minus representation fees and taxes, minus spending, compounded at real market returns.

How does Tom Hiddleston make money?

Salaires des films et participation backend documentée.

How is Tom Hiddleston's net worth calculated?

Les jours de paie divulgués sont saisis tels que rapportés, avec des citations. Les rôles principaux non divulgués utilisent la médiane des salaires divulgués pour leur époque et leur tranche budgétaire, plafonnés à 15 % du budget du film, et les rôles de soutien ou en début de carrière utilisent la fraction documentée de cette médiane avant la célébrité. Nous soustrayons les frais de représentation, les impôts pour les années où Tom a réellement travaillé et les dépenses du comportement d'épargne mesuré, puis nous composons les rendements réels du marché. Le backend, les avenants et les crédits de production non documentés entrent comme lignes estimées à partir des médianes divulguées. Chaque tarif et source est publié.

How much does Tom Hiddleston make per film?

Cela varie selon le rôle et l'époque, et le tableau film par film ci-dessus répertorie les rémunérations comptabilisées pour chaque titre. Les jours de paie divulgués entrent tels que déclarés. Les rôles non divulgués sont calqués sur ce que des acteurs comparables ont gagné à la même époque et dans la même fourchette budgétaire, les rôles principaux après la percée gagnant le plus et les rôles de soutien ou les premiers rôles une fraction documentée de ce montant.

Pourquoi le taux d'imposition est-il si élevé et les acteurs ne l'évitent-ils pas en faisant appel à une société de prêt ?

L'impôt est calculé au taux effectif de l'endroit où Tom vivait chaque année, qui est le taux indiqué dans le tableau année par année. Dans un État à fiscalité élevée comme la Californie, l'impôt sur le revenu fédéral et celui de l'État combinés atteignent près de la moitié du revenu d'un haut revenu, de sorte que ces années se situent autour de 40 %. Une société de prêt, par laquelle de nombreux acteurs gèrent leurs revenus, ne réduit pas l’impôt sur l’argent qu’ils rapportent à la maison. Son véritable avantage réside dans la déduction des coûts professionnels tels que les honoraires d’agent, de gestionnaire et d’avocat, et le modèle les soustrait déjà sur une ligne distincte avant l’application de toute taxe. Les entreprises à revenus élevés ne bénéficient également pas de la déduction commerciale répercutée à laquelle les autres propriétaires d’entreprise peuvent prétendre, de sorte que cela ne leur permet pas de réduire les taux.

Pourquoi ce chiffre est-il différent de celui des autres sites à valeur nette ?

Most sites publish a single number with no way to check it. This estimate is built in the open: every salary, rate, and assumption is on the page, and the page méthodologie lists every source.

Quelle est la précision de cette estimation ?

Aucune estimation de la valeur nette d’un particulier n’est exacte ; celui-ci est un modèle construit à partir de données publiques. La différence est que vous pouvez voir comment il a été construit et vérifier chaque étape. Le niveau de confiance situé en haut du calcul indique dans quelle mesure le chiffre repose sur des chiffres divulgués, et la page indique où un chiffre s'appuie sur une hypothèse.

Is Tom Hiddleston rich compared to the average person?

Yes. A net worth of $91.6 Million is far above the median American household, which sits near $193,000 according to Federal Reserve data.

What is Tom Hiddleston's biggest source of wealth?

On this page it is film salaries, the largest line in the calculation at $127.4 Million. The full breakdown, with every other line and its source, is above.

How much does Tom Hiddleston make from endorsements?

The model counts $16.0 Million in career endorsement income for Tom: 1 named partnerships x the $4.0M annual fee from the median disclosed film deal x a 4-year term, spread across the deal years. It is an estimate, since the individual deal values are not all public, and it sits as its own line in the calculation above.

Explorez d'autres acteurs

À propos de NetWorth Explained

We originally created NWE because nobody in the public-figure net worth space showed their work. Magazines and sites threw out big numbers while hiding behind vague claims of “proprietary algorithms” ou “insider knowledge.” That’s why we started the world’s only publication that transparently showed every assumption, every variable, and every calculation. We’re still the only ones who do it this way. En savoir plus sur NetWorth Explained.