Jennifer Garner 순자산 2026
최종 업데이트 August 3, 2026
As of 2026, Jennifer Garner has an estimated net worth of $135.9 Million, computed film by film and year by year from public records and published rates. Every input, rate, and source behind the number is on this page.
Calculation
- 공개된 급여 및 문서화된 백엔드(각각 인용 포함)
- 시대, 예산 범위, 경력 단계에 따라 공개된 비교 대상을 모델로 한 비공개 역할
- 공개된 중앙값에서 추정된 백엔드, 보증 및 생성 크레딧
Fast Facts
| Birthdate | April 17, 1972 |
|---|---|
| Birthplace | Houston |
| Breakthrough | Alias (2001) |
| Best Known | 13 Going on 30 (2004) |
Who Is Jennifer Garner?
Jennifer Garner was born April 17, 1972 in Houston, best known for 13 Going on 30 (2004). The earnings behind Jennifer's net worth come from film salaries, backend participation, producing and directing fees, endorsement deals, and the Once Upon a Farm stake.
The model tracks Jennifer's earning years from 1996 to 2026, with the biggest single year in 2007 at about $17.9 Million of gross income. After representation fees, taxes, and living costs, what stays invested compounds at market returns into an estimated $135.9 Million today.
Data
아래의 모든 라인은 공개 데이터와 당사에 게시된 요율표를 바탕으로 계산되었습니다. 방법론 페이지. 신뢰: C등급. 문서화된 숫자는 이 수치의 작은 부분만을 차지하므로 대부분은 게시된 요율 및 비교 항목(등급은 주로 문서화된 A부터 대부분 모델링된 C까지)을 기준으로 모델링됩니다.
The Calculation
| Line | Amount |
|---|---|
| Revenue | |
| Film pay, modeled lead roles (21 of 35 films) era and budget-band medians of disclosed lead salaries (winsorized, thin cells shrunk toward the era median), blended with this actor's disclosed quote history when available; soft breakthrough blend near the career break year | $79,249,653 |
| Film pay, modeled post-breakthrough supporting roles (7 of 35 films) 12.0% of lead cells: lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio | $10,302,326 |
| Film pay, modeled supporting and early roles (7 of 35 films) 시대 중앙값의 2.5%: 스타덤에 오르기 전 비율 | $7,438,700 |
| 백엔드 포인트, 추정 12% of disclosed lead deals included points, at a median 2.6% of box office; expected value on 14 commercially viable undisclosed lead roles; cash spread over 3 years; documented-but-unquantified points use the median rate directly; 1 film(s) used band-specific box-office/budget multiples as a gross proxy | $8,955,294 |
| 추천 수, 추정(2개 브랜드 파트너십) 2 named partnerships x the $4.0M annual fee from the median disclosed film deal x a 4-year term, spread across the deal years | $32,000,000 |
| Producer, director, and writer credits, estimated (3 credits) union-scale floor per credit, scaled to each era; post-breakthrough lead packages use a multiple of that floor; actual packages often run higher | $3,216,096 |
| 잔차, 추정 SAG residual rates on post-theatrical receipts assumed at half of box office, split by role share and spread over the ten years after each release; 3 film(s) used band-specific box-office proxies | $9,931,822 |
| Alias salary (2001-2005) Variety covered her mid-run raise; the series is booked from a reported $45K per episode early to $150K by the final season, interpolated between the documented endpoints (버라이어티닷컴) | $10,800,000 |
| 저축에 대한 투자 수익 mixed portfolio: 55% actual 60/40 securities returns (taxed) + 45% US long-run home-price rate on the rest | $43,567,455 |
| Brentwood Park home appreciation, estimated documented $7,900,000 purchase in 2019, 6.0%/yr US-CA appreciation, net 7% selling costs; the purchase itself is already counted in savings | $3,147,172 |
| First Brentwood marital home appreciation, estimated documented $5,500,000 purchase in 2004, sold 2025 for a documented $10,800,000, actual sale price, net 7% selling costs; the purchase itself is already counted in savings (hellomagazine.com) | $4,544,000 |
| Once Upon a Farm stake equity, estimated co-founded 2017 with a documented 7% stake; the February 2026 IPO priced the company at $724M and Forbes valued her stake at $64M on the first trading day; $724,000,000 x 7% stake (forbes.com) | $50,680,000 |
| Expenses | |
| 대리 수수료 대리인 10% + 변호사 5% | -$24,118,160 |
| Taxes US-CA 유효 요율, 연도별 | -$60,309,267 |
| 개인 지출 measured household savings rates by income, times a 88% entertainment-household factor | -$42,439,741 |
| 추정 순자산 | $135,859,189 |
영화별 영화
| Film | Year | Role | Budget | 매표소 | 계산된 급여 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Family Switch no disclosed fee: modeled on the $23.8M shrunk median for 2020s/large (n=2), capped at $10.5M | 2023 | 리드 + P | $70,000,000 | – | $10,499,969 |
| The Adam Project no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $16.4M shrunk median for 2020s/tentpole (n=5) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio) | 2022 | Supporting | $116,000,000 | – | $1,971,419 |
| Yes Day no disclosed fee: modeled on the $25.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid), capped at $0.9M | 2021 | 리드 + P | $6,000,000 | $2,000,000 | $899,997 |
| Wonder Park no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $20.0M shrunk median for 2010s/tentpole (n=12) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio) | 2019 | Supporting | $100,000,000 | $119,600,000 | $2,399,914 |
| Love, Simon no disclosed fee: modeled on the $5.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid), capped at $2.5M | 2018 | Lead | $17,000,000 | $66,300,000 | $2,549,786 |
| Peppermint no disclosed fee: modeled on the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3), capped at $3.8M | 2018 | Lead | $25,000,000 | $53,900,000 | $3,749,693 |
| A Happening of Monumental Proportions no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $5.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio) | 2017 | Supporting | $6,000,000 | $850,000 | $599,918 |
| The Tribes of Palos Verdes no disclosed fee: modeled on the $5.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid), capped at $0.8M | 2017 | Lead | $5,000,000 | $11,603 | $749,892 |
| Miracles from Heaven no disclosed fee: modeled on the $5.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid), capped at $2.1M | 2016 | Lead | $14,000,000 | $74,000,000 | $2,099,338 |
| Mother's Day no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio) | 2016 | Supporting | $25,000,000 | $48,800,000 | $1,319,650 |
| Nine Lives no disclosed fee: modeled on the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3), capped at $4.5M | 2016 | Lead | $30,000,000 | $57,800,000 | $4,498,583 |
| Wakefield no disclosed fee: modeled on the $5.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid), capped at $0.6M | 2016 | Lead | $4,000,000 | $874,187 | $599,841 |
| Danny Collins no disclosed fee: modeled on the $5.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid), capped at $1.5M | 2015 | Lead | $10,000,000 | $10,800,000 | $1,499,102 |
| Alexander and the Terrible, Horrible, No Good, Very Bad Day no disclosed fee: modeled on the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3), capped at $4.2M | 2014 | Lead | $28,000,000 | $100,600,000 | $4,195,011 |
| Draft Day no disclosed fee: modeled on the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3), capped at $3.8M | 2014 | Lead | $25,000,000 | $29,500,000 | $3,745,583 |
| Men, Women & Children no disclosed fee: modeled on the $5.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid), capped at $2.4M | 2014 | Lead | $16,000,000 | $2,200,000 | $2,397,108 |
| Dallas Buyers Club no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $5.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio) | 2013 | Supporting | $5,000,000 | $55,700,000 | $598,826 |
| The Odd Life of Timothy Green no disclosed fee: modeled on the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3), capped at $3.8M | 2012 | Lead | $25,000,000 | $56,000,000 | $3,733,303 |
| Arthur no disclosed fee: modeled on the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3), capped at $6.0M | 2011 | Lead | $40,000,000 | $48,100,000 | $5,946,666 |
| Butter no disclosed fee: modeled on the $5.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid), capped at $1.6M | 2011 | 리드 + P | $10,800,000 | $175,706 | $1,606,073 |
| Valentine's Day no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $20.0M shrunk median for 2010s/large (n=8) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio) | 2010 | Supporting | $52,000,000 | $216,500,000 | $2,365,826 |
| Ghosts of Girlfriends Past no disclosed fee: modeled on the $19.4M shrunk median for 2000s/mid (n=2), capped at $5.6M | 2009 | Lead | $37,500,000 | $102,400,000 | $5,447,930 |
| The Invention of Lying no disclosed fee: modeled on the $18.8M median for its era and nearest band (mid), capped at $2.8M | 2009 | Lead | $18,500,000 | $32,700,000 | $2,695,561 |
| Juno no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $18.8M median for its era and nearest band (mid) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio), capped at 15% of budget | 2007 | Supporting | $7,500,000 | $231,400,000 | $1,046,773 |
| The Kingdom no disclosed fee: modeled on the $20.0M shrunk median for 2000s/large (n=18), capped at $10.9M | 2007 | Lead | $72,500,000 | $87,000,000 | $9,638,270 |
| Catch and Release soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.79): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $19.4M shrunk median for 2000s/mid (n=2), capped at $3.8M vs early terms | 2006 | Lead | $25,000,000 | $16,000,000 | $3,068,763 |
| Elektra soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.66): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $20.0M shrunk median for 2000s/large (n=18), capped at $9.8M vs early terms | 2005 | Lead | $65,000,000 | $57,000,000 | $6,611,996 |
| 13 Going on 30 soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.50): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $19.4M shrunk median for 2000s/mid (n=2), capped at $5.5M vs early terms | 2004 | Lead | $37,000,000 | $96,500,000 | $3,017,188 |
| Daredevil soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.34): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $20.0M shrunk median for 2000s/large (n=18), capped at $11.7M vs early terms | 2003 | Lead | $78,000,000 | $179,200,000 | $4,299,529 |
| Pearl Harbor no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $11.8M shrunk median for 2000s/tentpole (n=9) (pre-stardom rate) | 2001 | Supporting | $140,000,000 | $449,200,000 | $429,287 |
| Stealing Time no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $19.4M shrunk median for 2000s/mid (n=2) (pre-stardom rate); soft-breakthrough weight 0.12 | 2001 | Lead | $40,000,000 | – | $1,141,854 |
| Dude, Where's My Car? no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $18.8M median for its era and nearest band (mid) (pre-stardom rate) | 2000 | Supporting | $13,000,000 | $73,200,000 | $564,986 |
| Deconstructing Harry no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $14.4M shrunk median for 1990s/mid (n=6) (pre-stardom rate) | 1997 | Supporting | $20,000,000 | $10,600,000 | $372,097 |
| Mr. Magoo no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $14.4M shrunk median for 1990s/mid (n=6) (pre-stardom rate) | 1997 | Supporting | $30,000,000 | $28,900,000 | $372,097 |
| Washington Square no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $10.0M shrunk median for 1990s/small (n=1) (pre-stardom rate) | 1997 | Supporting | $15,000,000 | $1,900,000 | $258,850 |
모델링된 수치의 작동 방식. An undisclosed lead role after the breakthrough gets the median of disclosed lead salaries for its era and budget band, capped at 15% of the film’s budget. Supporting and pre-breakthrough roles get 2.5% of that median, the documented going rate for actors before stardom. Films with no reported budget are treated as small productions. Undocumented backend, endorsements, and producer or director credits enter as separate estimated lines in the calculation above, built from disclosed medians. Every median comes from the published tables on our 방법론 페이지.
순자산 Over Time
아래의 연도별 표와 일치하는 매년 말의 모델링된 잔액입니다.
해마다
| Year | Income | 담당자 수수료 | 세율 | Spent | Saved | Balance |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | $311,972 | $46,796 | 45% | $131,729 | $14,118 | $135,859,189 |
| 2025 | $470,405 | $70,561 | 45% | $173,468 | $46,446 | $75,936,192 |
| 2024 | $548,991 | $82,349 | 45% | $202,448 | $54,205 | $70,737,179 |
| 2023 | $8,890,581 | $1,333,587 | 45% | $2,290,978 | $1,865,368 | $65,449,410 |
| 2022 | $4,832,044 | $724,807 | 45% | $1,245,150 | $1,013,831 | $58,360,138 |
| 2021 | $2,623,004 | $393,451 | 45% | $675,911 | $550,343 | $61,539,287 |
| 2020 | $753,448 | $113,017 | 45% | $237,549 | $114,688 | $56,252,563 |
| 2019 | $2,226,416 | $333,962 | 45% | $573,716 | $467,133 | $52,255,111 |
| 2018 | $5,739,255 | $860,888 | 45% | $1,478,926 | $1,204,176 | $46,807,094 |
| 2017 | $3,417,529 | $512,629 | 47% | $848,626 | $690,971 | $45,338,143 |
| 2016 | $7,006,451 | $1,050,968 | 47% | $1,739,811 | $1,416,595 | $41,489,278 |
| 2015 | $4,136,789 | $620,518 | 47% | $1,027,229 | $836,394 | $38,092,845 |
| 2014 | $8,243,201 | $1,236,480 | 47% | $2,046,915 | $1,666,647 | $36,372,863 |
| 2013 | $4,092,268 | $613,840 | 47% | $1,016,174 | $827,393 | $32,709,005 |
| 2012 | $3,331,476 | $499,721 | 43% | $889,692 | $724,408 | $29,196,271 |
| 2011 | $8,175,735 | $1,226,360 | 43% | $2,183,382 | $1,777,761 | $26,689,535 |
| 2010 | $4,548,949 | $682,342 | 43% | $1,214,826 | $989,140 | $23,990,537 |
| 2009 | $9,046,165 | $1,356,925 | 43% | $2,415,836 | $1,967,031 | $21,530,715 |
| 2008 | $4,941,083 | $741,162 | 43% | $1,319,548 | $1,074,407 | $17,857,715 |
| 2007 | $17,898,527 | $2,684,779 | 43% | $4,779,916 | $3,891,920 | $18,449,278 |
| 2006 | $13,772,494 | $2,065,874 | 43% | $3,678,033 | $2,994,741 | $13,926,088 |
| 2005 | $17,234,015 | $2,585,102 | 43% | $4,602,454 | $3,747,426 | $10,249,824 |
| 2004 | $15,323,298 | $2,298,495 | 43% | $4,092,185 | $3,331,953 | $6,273,902 |
| 2003 | $6,237,522 | $935,628 | 43% | $1,665,770 | $1,356,309 | $2,790,369 |
| 2002 | $2,812,555 | $421,883 | 46% | $711,579 | $579,384 | $1,306,058 |
| 2001 | $2,116,301 | $317,445 | 46% | $535,426 | $435,956 | $749,249 |
| 2000 | $872,794 | $130,919 | 46% | $270,173 | $130,439 | $313,427 |
| 1999 | $175,457 | $26,319 | 46% | $63,526 | $17,009 | $180,142 |
| 1998 | $5,962 | $894 | 46% | $2,471 | $265 | $152,321 |
| 1997 | $702,131 | $105,320 | 46% | $217,344 | $104,934 | $137,569 |
| 1996 | $300,913 | $45,137 | 46% | $108,948 | $29,171 | $29,171 |
Model Notes
- salary comps: 2 disclosed lead fee(s) flagged as non-market outliers (scale / far-below-quote) and excluded from era medians
방법론
We rebuild Jennifer’s career as a yearly time series. Disclosed salaries and documented backend enter as reported, with citations. Undisclosed lead roles get the median of disclosed salaries for their era and budget band, capped at 15% of the film’s budget. Supporting roles and roles from before the breakthrough get 2.5% of that median, the going-rate ratio measured from disclosed pre-stardom deals. Films with no reported budget are treated as small productions, and every role is estimated unless a source documents it was unpaid. Representation fees come out at sourced rates, taxes follow the eras actually lived through, spending follows measured household savings behavior unless court documents say otherwise, and what remains compounds at real market returns. Undocumented backend enters as an expected value from disclosed deals, endorsements at the median disclosed ambassador fee, and producer or director credits at union-scale floors.
전체 모델, 모든 요율표 및 실제 거래와 비교하여 추정치를 확인한 방법은 다음과 같습니다. 방법론 페이지.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is Jennifer Garner's net worth in 2026?
As of 2026, Jennifer Garner's net worth is an estimated $135.9 Million. The estimate is built film by film from disclosed salaries and documented backend, then year by year: income, minus representation fees and taxes, minus spending, compounded at real market returns.
How does Jennifer Garner make money?
Alias salaries built from Variety-covered raise reporting, plus film leads modeled from their budgets. Her Capital One campaign enters as an estimated endorsement line and her documented Juno points at the median disclosed backend rate; the Once Upon a Farm stake stays queued.
How is Jennifer Garner's net worth calculated?
공개된 급여일은 보고된 대로 인용과 함께 입력됩니다. 공개되지 않은 주연 역할은 해당 시대 및 예산 범위에 대해 공개된 급여의 중앙값을 사용하며 영화 예산의 15%로 제한되며, 조연 또는 초기 경력 역할은 문서화된 해당 중앙값의 스타덤 이전 부분을 사용합니다. 우리는 측정된 저축 행위에서 소싱된 대표 수수료, Jennifer가 실제로 근무한 기간 동안의 세금, 지출을 뺀 다음 실제 시장 수익률을 복리로 계산합니다. 문서화되지 않은 백엔드, 보증 및 생성 크레딧은 공개된 중앙값의 추정 라인으로 입력됩니다. 모든 요금과 소스가 게시됩니다.
How much does Jennifer Garner make per film?
역할과 시대에 따라 다르며 위의 영화별 표에는 모든 타이틀에 대해 계산된 급여가 나열되어 있습니다. 공개된 급여일은 보고된 대로 입력됩니다. 공개되지 않은 역할은 같은 시대와 예산 범위에서 비슷한 배우가 얻은 것을 모델로 하며, 획기적인 이후의 주연은 가장 많은 수익을 올리고 조연 또는 초기 역할은 그 중 문서화된 부분을 차지합니다.
세율이 왜 이렇게 높은데, 배우들은 대출회사를 통해서 피하지 않는 걸까요?
세금은 매년 제니퍼가 살았던 곳에 대한 유효 세율, 즉 연도별 표에 표시된 세율로 부과됩니다. 캘리포니아와 같이 세금이 높은 주에서는 연방 소득세와 주 소득세를 합쳐서 최고 소득자의 소득의 거의 절반에 달하므로 해당 연도는 40% 중반에 이릅니다. 많은 배우들이 수입을 운영하는 기업인 대출 회사는 집으로 가져가는 돈에 대한 세금을 낮추지 않습니다. 실질적인 이점은 대리인, 관리자, 변호사 비용과 같은 비즈니스 비용을 공제하는 것이며 모델은 세금이 적용되기 전에 이미 이를 별도의 라인으로 공제합니다. 또한 고소득 기업은 다른 회사 소유주가 청구할 수 있는 통과 사업 공제 범위에서 제외되므로 요금을 인하하지 않고 구매합니다.
이 수치가 다른 순자산 사이트와 다른 이유는 무엇입니까?
Most sites publish a single number with no way to check it. This estimate is built in the open: every salary, rate, and assumption is on the page, and the 방법론 페이지 lists every source.
이 추정치는 얼마나 정확합니까?
개인의 순자산 추정치는 정확하지 않습니다. 이것은 공개 데이터로 구축된 모델입니다. 차이점은 어떻게 제작되었는지 볼 수 있고 모든 단계를 확인할 수 있다는 점입니다. 계산 상단 근처의 신뢰 등급은 수치 중 공개된 숫자에 얼마나 많은 영향을 미치는지 보여주며 페이지에는 숫자가 가정에 의존하는 위치가 표시됩니다.
Is Jennifer Garner rich compared to the average person?
Yes. A net worth of $135.9 Million is far above the median American household, which sits near $193,000 according to Federal Reserve data.
What is Jennifer Garner's biggest source of wealth?
On this page it is film salaries, the largest line in the calculation at $79.2 Million. The full breakdown, with every other line and its source, is above.
How much does Jennifer Garner make from endorsements?
The model counts $32.0 Million in career endorsement income for Jennifer: 2 named partnerships x the $4.0M annual fee from the median disclosed film deal x a 4-year term, spread across the deal years. It is an estimate, since the individual deal values are not all public, and it sits as its own line in the calculation above.
What businesses does Jennifer Garner own?
The stake counted on this page is Once Upon a Farm stake. It is valued from a reported transaction or a revenue multiple, and shown as its own line in the calculation above with the basis next to it.
다른 배우 탐색
NetWorth Explained 소개
We originally created NWE because nobody in the public-figure net worth space showed their work. Magazines and sites threw out big numbers while hiding behind vague claims of “proprietary algorithms” 또는 “insider knowledge.” That’s why we started the world’s only publication that transparently showed every assumption, every variable, and every calculation. We’re still the only ones who do it this way. NetWorth Explained에 대해 자세히 알아보세요..