Angelina Jolie Net Worth 2026
Huling na-update August 3, 2026
As of 2026, Angelina Jolie has an estimated net worth of $200.2 Million, computed film by film and year by year from public records and published rates. Every input, rate, and source behind the number is on this page.
Calculation
- Ibinunyag ang mga suweldo at dokumentadong backend, bawat isa ay may citation
- Ang mga hindi isiniwalat na tungkulin na na-modelo mula sa mga inihayag na maihahambing para sa kanilang panahon, banda ng badyet, at yugto ng karera
- Backend, pag-endorso, at paggawa ng mga kredito na tinantya mula sa mga isiniwalat na median
Fast Facts
| Birthdate | June 4, 1975 |
|---|---|
| Birthplace | Los Angeles |
| Breakthrough | Girl, Interrupted (1999) |
| Best Known | Maleficent (2014) |
Who Is Angelina Jolie?
Angelina Jolie was born June 4, 1975 in Los Angeles, best known for Maleficent (2014). The earnings behind Angelina's net worth come from film salaries, backend participation, producing and directing fees, and the Atelier Jolie.
The model tracks Angelina's earning years from 1982 to 2026, with the biggest single year in 2010 at about $41.2 Million of gross income. After representation fees, taxes, and living costs, what stays invested compounds at market returns into an estimated $200.2 Million today.
Data
Ang bawat linya sa ibaba ay kinukuwenta mula sa pampublikong data at sa mga na-publish na talahanayan ng rate sa aming pahina ng metodolohiya. Kumpiyansa: Baitang B. Ang mga dokumentadong numero ay nagtataglay ng isang patas na bahagi ng figure na ito at ang mga nai-publish na mga rate ay nagmomodelo sa iba (mga grado ay tumatakbo mula A, karamihan ay dokumentado, hanggang C, karamihan ay nakamodelo).
The Calculation
| Line | Amount |
|---|---|
| Revenue | |
| Film pay with a disclosed figure (7 of 43 films) sa bawat pelikula at backend mula sa binanggit na pag-uulat | $118,000,000 |
| Film pay, modeled lead roles (16 of 43 films) era and budget-band medians of disclosed lead salaries (winsorized, thin cells shrunk toward the era median), blended with this actor's disclosed quote history when available; soft breakthrough blend near the career break year | $151,850,977 |
| Film pay, modeled post-breakthrough supporting roles (10 of 43 films) 12.0% of lead cells: lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio | $18,769,577 |
| Film pay, modeled supporting and early roles (10 of 43 films) 2.5% ng mga median ng panahon: ang pre-stardom rate | $5,790,072 |
| Mga backend point, tinantiya 12% of disclosed lead deals included points, at a median 2.6% of box office; expected value on 10 commercially viable undisclosed lead roles; cash spread over 3 years | $5,938,592 |
| Producer, director, and writer credits, estimated (2 credits) union-scale floor per credit, scaled to each era; post-breakthrough lead packages use a multiple of that floor; actual packages often run higher | $536,016 |
| Nalalabi, tinatantya SAG residual rates on post-theatrical receipts assumed at half of box office, split by role share and spread over the ten years after each release; 4 film(s) used band-specific box-office proxies | $28,369,947 |
| TV: True Women Georgia Lawshe Woods; one engagement for a television film or special; broadcast network family; priced from tv_episode_rates.csv (en.wikipedia.org) | $75,000 |
| TV: George Wallace Cornelia Wallace; one engagement for a television film or special; network not identified, priced on the broadcast cell; priced from tv_episode_rates.csv (en.wikipedia.org) | $75,000 |
| TV: Gia Gia Carangi; one engagement for a television film or special; variety format tier; priced from tv_episode_rates.csv (en.wikipedia.org) | $75,000 |
| TV: Kung Fu Panda Holiday Master Tigress (voice); one engagement for a television film or special; animation format tier; priced from tv_episode_rates.csv (en.wikipedia.org) | $35,000 |
| Directing fees, estimated In the Land of Blood and Honey (2011), Unbroken (2014), and First They Killed My Father (2017) were directing jobs with no published fee, each booked at the DGA union-scale floor for its era (dga.org) | $830,000 |
| Louis Vuitton Core Values campaign reported ~$10M single-campaign fee in 2011, described at the time as a record for one campaign; a portion was donated (wwd.com) | $10,000,000 |
| Puhunan returns sa savings mixed portfolio: 55% actual 60/40 securities returns (taxed) + 45% US long-run home-price rate on the rest | $91,581,585 |
| Los Feliz estate (De Mille Drive) appreciation, estimated documented $24,500,000 purchase in 2017, 6.0%/yr US-CA appreciation, net 7% selling costs; the purchase itself is already counted in savings (robbreport.com) | $13,994,778 |
| Chateau Miraval half-stake, France appreciation, estimated estimated $30,000,000 purchase in 2012, sold 2021 for a documented $54,400,000 (her half of the couple's reported ~$60M purchase, estimated; her share's 2021 sale to Stoli's Tenute del Mondo was reported between $54.4M and $64M; low end used), actual sale price, net 7% selling costs; the purchase itself is already counted in savings (winespectator.com) | $20,592,000 |
| Battambang home, Cambodia appreciation, estimated estimated $150,000 purchase in 2003 (documented to exist, no published price; rural-Cambodia comparables), 4.0%/yr Cambodia appreciation, net 7% selling costs; the purchase itself is already counted in savings (hellomagazine.com) | $193,828 |
| Atelier Jolie equity, estimated assumed enterprise value for the young NYC atelier venture, no published financials: $2,000,000 x 100% stake | $2,000,000 |
| Expenses | |
| Mga bayarin sa representasyon ahente 10% + abogado 5% | -$50,852,056 |
| Taxes Mga epektibong rate ng US-CA, taon-taon | -$127,684,101 |
| Personal na paggasta measured household savings rates by income, times a 88% entertainment-household factor | -$88,627,711 |
| Tinatayang netong halaga | $200,212,032 |
Pelikula ayon sa Pelikula
| Film | Year | Role | Budget | Box office | Binilang ang bayad |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Couture no disclosed fee: modeled on the $23.8M shrunk median for 2020s/large (n=2), capped at $10.5M | 2025 | Lead | $70,000,000 | $2,000,000 | $10,500,000 |
| Maria no disclosed fee: modeled on the $21.7M shrunk median for 2020s/mid (n=1), capped at $3.0M | 2024 | Lead | $20,000,000 | $1,600,000 | $3,000,000 |
| Eternals disclosed: reported at more than $35M, her heftiest paycheck | 2021 | Supporting | $200,000,000 | $402,100,000 | $35,000,000 |
| Those Who Wish Me Dead no disclosed fee: modeled on the $21.7M shrunk median for 2020s/mid (n=1), capped at $3.0M | 2021 | Lead | $20,000,000 | $23,500,000 | $2,999,999 |
| Come Away no disclosed fee: modeled on the $21.7M shrunk median for 2020s/mid (n=1), capped at $6.8M | 2020 | Lead | $45,000,000 | $1,746,860 | $6,749,995 |
| The One and Only Ivan no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $23.8M shrunk median for 2020s/large (n=2) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio) | 2020 | Supporting | $60,000,000 | – | $2,849,998 |
| Maleficent: Mistress of Evil no disclosed fee: modeled on the $20.0M shrunk median for 2010s/tentpole (n=12) | 2019 | Lead | $185,000,000 | $491,700,000 | $19,999,968 |
| Kung Fu Panda 3 no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $20.0M shrunk median for 2010s/tentpole (n=12) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio) | 2016 | Supporting | $145,000,000 | $521,200,000 | $2,399,977 |
| By the Sea no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $5.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio), capped at 15% of budget | 2015 | Supporting + DS | $10,000,000 | $3,300,000 | $1,499,968 |
| Maleficent no disclosed fee: modeled on the $15.8M shrunk median for 2010s/blockbuster (n=11); blended 75% with this actor's disclosed quote history ($19.0M personal, n=3) | 2014 | Lead | $263,000,000 | $758,500,000 | $18,191,500 |
| Kung Fu Panda 2 no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $20.0M shrunk median for 2010s/tentpole (n=12) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio) | 2011 | Supporting | $150,000,000 | $665,700,000 | $2,399,363 |
| Salt disclosed: reported $20M plus a percentage of gross | 2010 | Lead | $130,000,000 | $293,500,000 | $20,000,000 |
| The Tourist disclosed: reported $19M | 2010 | Lead | $100,000,000 | $278,300,000 | $19,000,000 |
| Changeling no disclosed fee: modeled on the $20.0M shrunk median for 2000s/large (n=18); blended 75% with this actor's disclosed quote history ($12.0M personal, n=4); cap raised to similar-budget personal max within 50% of budget ($15.0M) | 2008 | Lead | $55,000,000 | $113,400,000 | $13,966,620 |
| Kung Fu Panda no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $11.8M shrunk median for 2000s/tentpole (n=9) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio) | 2008 | Supporting | $130,000,000 | $631,700,000 | $1,437,170 |
| Wanted disclosed: reported $15M | 2008 | Lead | $75,000,000 | $342,500,000 | $15,000,000 |
| A Mighty Heart no disclosed fee: modeled on the $18.8M median for its era and nearest band (mid); personal blend cut to 23% on a smaller-than-usual budget; blended 23% with this actor's disclosed quote history ($12.0M personal, n=4); cap raised to similar-budget personal max within 50% of budget ($8.0M), capped at $8.0M | 2007 | Lead | $16,000,000 | $18,900,000 | $7,963,814 |
| Beowulf no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $11.8M shrunk median for 2000s/tentpole (n=9) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio) | 2007 | Supporting | $150,000,000 | $196,400,000 | $1,434,501 |
| The Good Shepherd no disclosed fee: modeled on the $20.0M shrunk median for 2000s/large (n=18); blended 75% with this actor's disclosed quote history ($10.0M personal, n=3), capped at $12.0M | 2006 | Lead | $80,000,000 | $100,300,000 | $11,892,866 |
| Mr. & Mrs. Smith disclosed: reported $10M | 2005 | Lead | $110,000,000 | $487,300,000 | $10,000,000 |
| Alexander no disclosed fee: modeled on the $11.8M shrunk median for 2000s/tentpole (n=9); blended 75% with this actor's disclosed quote history ($10.0M personal, n=3) | 2004 | Lead | $155,000,000 | $167,300,000 | $10,104,614 |
| Shark Tale no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $20.0M shrunk median for 2000s/large (n=18) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio) | 2004 | Supporting | $75,000,000 | $374,600,000 | $2,334,554 |
| Sky Captain and the World of Tomorrow no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $20.0M shrunk median for 2000s/large (n=18) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio) | 2004 | Supporting | $70,000,000 | $58,000,000 | $2,334,554 |
| Taking Lives no disclosed fee: modeled on the $19.4M shrunk median for 2000s/mid (n=2); personal blend cut to 61% on a smaller-than-usual budget; blended 61% with this actor's disclosed quote history ($10.0M personal, n=3); cap raised to similar-budget personal max within 50% of budget ($12.0M), capped at $12.0M | 2004 | Lead | $45,000,000 | $65,400,000 | $11,603,342 |
| Beyond Borders no disclosed fee: modeled on the $19.4M shrunk median for 2000s/mid (n=2); personal blend cut to 50% on a smaller-than-usual budget; blended 50% with this actor's disclosed quote history ($12.0M personal, n=2); cap raised to similar-budget personal max within 50% of budget ($12.0M), capped at $12.0M | 2003 | Lead | $35,000,000 | $11,700,000 | $11,251,839 |
| Lara Croft: Tomb Raider, Cradle of Life disclosed: reported $12M | 2003 | Lead | $95,000,000 | $160,100,000 | $12,000,000 |
| Life or Something Like It no disclosed fee: modeled on the $19.4M shrunk median for 2000s/mid (n=2); personal blend cut to 57% on a smaller-than-usual budget; blended 57% with this actor's disclosed quote history ($12.0M personal, n=2); cap raised to similar-budget personal max within 50% of budget ($12.0M), capped at $12.0M | 2002 | Lead | $40,000,000 | $16,900,000 | $10,627,304 |
| Lara Croft: Tomb Raider disclosed: reported $7M | 2001 | Lead | $115,000,000 | $274,700,000 | $7,000,000 |
| Original Sin soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.79): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $20.0M shrunk median for 2000s/large (n=18); personal blend cut to 65% on a smaller-than-usual budget; blended 65% with this actor's disclosed quote history ($7.0M personal, n=1), capped at $7.5M vs early terms | 2001 | Lead | $50,000,000 | $35,400,000 | $6,039,740 |
| Gone in 60 Seconds soft-breakthrough supporting blend (w=0.66) | 2000 | Supporting | $103,300,000 | $237,200,000 | $1,037,304 |
| Girl, Interrupted soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.50): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $14.4M shrunk median for 1990s/mid (n=6), capped at $6.0M vs early terms | 1999 | Lead | $40,000,000 | $48,300,000 | $3,179,688 |
| Pushing Tin soft-breakthrough supporting blend (w=0.50) | 1999 | Supporting | $33,000,000 | $8,400,000 | $1,042,188 |
| The Bone Collector soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.50): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $14.4M shrunk median for 1990s/mid (n=6), capped at $7.2M vs early terms | 1999 | Lead | $48,000,000 | $151,500,000 | $3,779,688 |
| Hell's Kitchen soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.34): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $10.0M shrunk median for 1990s/small (n=1), capped at $0.9M vs early terms | 1998 | Lead | $6,000,000 | $22,513 | $470,508 |
| Playing by Heart soft-breakthrough supporting blend (w=0.34) | 1998 | Supporting | $20,000,000 | $3,970,078 | $822,655 |
| Playing God soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.21): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $10.0M shrunk median for 1990s/small (n=1), capped at $1.8M vs early terms | 1997 | Lead | $12,000,000 | $4,166,918 | $573,343 |
| Foxfire no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $14.4M shrunk median for 1990s/mid (n=6) (pre-stardom rate); soft-breakthrough weight 0.12 | 1996 | Lead | $26,000,000 | $269,300 | $781,428 |
| Love Is All There Is no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $14.4M shrunk median for 1990s/mid (n=6) (pre-stardom rate) | 1996 | Supporting | $26,000,000 | $32,925 | $522,161 |
| Mojave Moon no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $14.4M shrunk median for 1990s/mid (n=6) (pre-stardom rate); soft-breakthrough weight 0.12 | 1996 | Lead | $26,000,000 | – | $781,428 |
| Without Evidence no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $14.4M shrunk median for 1990s/mid (n=6) (pre-stardom rate); soft-breakthrough weight 0.12 | 1996 | Lead | $26,000,000 | – | $781,428 |
| Hackers no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $14.4M shrunk median for 1990s/mid (n=6) (pre-stardom rate); soft-breakthrough weight 0.06 | 1995 | Lead | $20,000,000 | $7,500,000 | $530,934 |
| Cyborg 2 no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $14.4M shrunk median for 1990s/mid (n=6) (pre-stardom rate); soft-breakthrough weight 0.02 | 1993 | Lead | $26,000,000 | – | $423,057 |
| Lookin' to Get Out no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $4.1M shrunk median for pre1990/small (n=2) (pre-stardom rate) | 1982 | Supporting | $17,000,000 | $946,461 | $103,130 |
Paano gumagana ang mga modelong figure. An undisclosed lead role after the breakthrough gets the median of disclosed lead salaries for its era and budget band, capped at 15% of the film’s budget. Supporting and pre-breakthrough roles get 2.5% of that median, the documented going rate for actors before stardom. Films with no reported budget are treated as small productions. Undocumented backend, endorsements, and producer or director credits enter as separate estimated lines in the calculation above, built from disclosed medians. Every median comes from the published tables on our pahina ng metodolohiya.
Net Worth Sa Paglipas ng Panahon
Nakamodelong balanse sa katapusan ng bawat taon, na tumutugma sa talahanayan sa bawat taon sa ibaba.
Taon-taon
| Year | Income | Mga bayarin sa Rep | Halaga ng buwis | Spent | Saved | Balance |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | $460,537 | $69,081 | 45% | $169,830 | $45,472 | $200,212,032 |
| 2025 | $7,809,824 | $1,171,474 | 45% | $2,012,482 | $1,638,610 | $160,143,058 |
| 2024 | $6,159,423 | $923,913 | 45% | $1,587,197 | $1,292,333 | $147,742,720 |
| 2023 | $1,833,417 | $275,013 | 45% | $472,446 | $384,677 | $135,606,793 |
| 2022 | $933,417 | $140,013 | 45% | $294,290 | $142,083 | $124,112,611 |
| 2021 | $38,559,445 | $5,783,917 | 45% | $9,936,229 | $8,090,311 | $133,034,858 |
| 2020 | $9,375,681 | $1,406,352 | 45% | $2,415,982 | $1,967,149 | $115,241,394 |
| 2019 | $18,343,593 | $2,751,539 | 45% | $4,726,887 | $3,848,743 | $105,439,656 |
| 2018 | $7,323,347 | $1,098,502 | 45% | $1,887,124 | $1,536,541 | $91,820,065 |
| 2017 | $1,662,865 | $249,430 | 47% | $412,915 | $336,205 | $89,759,330 |
| 2016 | $3,801,809 | $570,271 | 47% | $944,048 | $768,666 | $83,098,228 |
| 2015 | $4,716,793 | $707,519 | 47% | $1,171,253 | $953,662 | $78,261,974 |
| 2014 | $15,624,815 | $2,343,722 | 47% | $3,879,885 | $3,159,094 | $75,474,839 |
| 2013 | $6,945,839 | $1,041,876 | 47% | $1,724,760 | $1,404,340 | $68,154,247 |
| 2012 | $1,498,428 | $224,764 | 43% | $400,165 | $325,824 | $61,127,660 |
| 2011 | $13,516,321 | $2,027,448 | 43% | $3,609,620 | $2,939,037 | $56,995,665 |
| 2010 | $41,151,865 | $6,172,780 | 43% | $10,989,869 | $8,948,210 | $52,057,616 |
| 2009 | $1,536,244 | $230,437 | 43% | $410,264 | $334,047 | $40,353,041 |
| 2008 | $27,060,120 | $4,059,018 | 43% | $7,226,578 | $5,884,050 | $36,529,304 |
| 2007 | $12,324,609 | $1,848,691 | 43% | $3,291,366 | $2,679,907 | $33,687,209 |
| 2006 | $12,481,992 | $1,872,299 | 43% | $3,333,396 | $2,714,129 | $29,662,692 |
| 2005 | $14,517,943 | $2,177,691 | 43% | $3,877,110 | $3,156,834 | $25,268,433 |
| 2004 | $19,213,509 | $2,882,026 | 43% | $5,131,091 | $4,177,855 | $21,334,594 |
| 2003 | $28,226,314 | $4,233,947 | 43% | $7,538,018 | $6,137,631 | $16,272,762 |
| 2002 | $11,241,533 | $1,686,230 | 46% | $2,844,117 | $2,315,747 | $9,230,485 |
| 2001 | $14,862,676 | $2,229,401 | 46% | $3,760,269 | $3,061,699 | $7,129,552 |
| 2000 | $2,950,545 | $442,582 | 46% | $746,490 | $607,810 | $4,069,602 |
| 1999 | $6,204,904 | $930,736 | 46% | $1,569,846 | $1,278,205 | $3,407,963 |
| 1998 | $3,468,720 | $520,308 | 46% | $877,589 | $714,553 | $1,988,593 |
| 1997 | $1,024,851 | $153,728 | 46% | $259,288 | $211,118 | $1,152,656 |
| 1996 | $2,209,950 | $331,493 | 46% | $559,119 | $455,248 | $841,594 |
| 1995 | $1,258,568 | $188,785 | 46% | $318,419 | $259,264 | $358,097 |
| 1994 | $186,261 | $27,939 | 46% | $67,437 | $18,056 | $87,038 |
| 1993 | $296,140 | $44,421 | 46% | $91,670 | $44,258 | $67,751 |
| 1992 | $127,054 | $19,058 | 36% | $54,520 | $14,598 | $22,194 |
| 1991 | $136 | $20 | 36% | $67 | $7 | $7,240 |
| 1990 | $136 | $20 | 36% | $67 | $7 | $6,485 |
| 1989 | $136 | $20 | 36% | $67 | $7 | $6,308 |
| 1988 | $136 | $20 | 36% | $67 | $7 | $5,647 |
| 1987 | $136 | $20 | 45% | $58 | $6 | $5,267 |
| 1986 | $136 | $20 | 55% | $47 | $5 | $5,075 |
| 1985 | $136 | $20 | 55% | $47 | $5 | $4,665 |
| 1984 | $136 | $20 | 55% | $47 | $5 | $4,132 |
| 1983 | $136 | $20 | 55% | $47 | $5 | $3,901 |
| 1982 | $103,130 | $15,469 | 55% | $35,629 | $3,818 | $3,818 |
Model Notes
- salary comps: 2 disclosed lead fee(s) flagged as non-market outliers (scale / far-below-quote) and excluded from era medians
Pamamaraan
We rebuild Angelina’s career as a yearly time series. Disclosed salaries and documented backend enter as reported, with citations. Undisclosed lead roles get the median of disclosed salaries for their era and budget band, capped at 15% of the film’s budget. Supporting roles and roles from before the breakthrough get 2.5% of that median, the going-rate ratio measured from disclosed pre-stardom deals. Films with no reported budget are treated as small productions, and every role is estimated unless a source documents it was unpaid. Representation fees come out at sourced rates, taxes follow the eras actually lived through, spending follows measured household savings behavior unless court documents say otherwise, and what remains compounds at real market returns. Undocumented backend enters as an expected value from disclosed deals, endorsements at the median disclosed ambassador fee, and producer or director credits at union-scale floors.
Ang buong modelo, bawat talahanayan ng rate, at kung paano nasuri ang aming mga pagtatantya laban sa mga tunay na deal ay nasa pahina ng metodolohiya.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is Angelina Jolie's net worth in 2026?
As of 2026, Angelina Jolie's net worth is an estimated $200.2 Million. The estimate is built film by film from disclosed salaries and documented backend, then year by year: income, minus representation fees and taxes, minus spending, compounded at real market returns.
How does Angelina Jolie make money?
Disclosed film salaries from Tomb Raider ($7M) through Maleficent (a reported $33M including backend), with Salt and The Tourist at $19-20M each. Directing fees and the Miraval sale are excluded until they can be netted properly.
How is Angelina Jolie's net worth calculated?
Disclosed paydays enter as reported, with citations. Undisclosed lead roles use the median of disclosed salaries for their era and budget band, capped at 15% of the film's budget, and supporting or early-career roles use the documented pre-stardom fraction of that median. We subtract sourced representation fees, taxes for the years Angelina actually worked, and spending from measured savings behavior, then compound at real market returns. Undocumented backend, endorsements, and producing credits enter as estimated lines from disclosed medians. Every rate and source is published.
How much does Angelina Jolie make per film?
Nag-iiba-iba ito ayon sa papel at panahon, at ang talahanayan ng film-by-film sa itaas ay naglilista ng bayad na binibilang para sa bawat pamagat. Ang mga isiniwalat na araw ng suweldo ay pumasok tulad ng iniulat. Ang mga hindi nasabi na tungkulin ay na-modelo mula sa kung ano ang maihahambing na mga aktor na kinita sa parehong panahon at hanay ng badyet, na may mga pangunahing tungkulin pagkatapos ng pambihirang tagumpay na kumikita ng pinakamaraming at sumusuporta o maagang mga tungkulin ay isang dokumentadong bahagi nito.
Bakit napakataas ng rate ng buwis, at hindi ba ito iniiwasan ng mga aktor sa isang loan-out na kumpanya?
Tax comes out at the effective rate for where Angelina lived each year, which is the rate shown in the year-by-year table. In a high-tax state like California, combined federal and state income tax reaches close to half of a top earner's income, so those years run in the mid-40s percent. A loan-out company, the corporation many actors run their income through, does not lower the tax on the money they take home. Its real advantage is deducting business costs such as agent, manager, and attorney fees, and the model already subtracts those as a separate line before any tax is applied. High-earning performers also fall outside the pass-through business deduction that other company owners can claim, so it buys them no rate cut.
Bakit naiiba ang figure na ito sa ibang net worth na mga site?
Most sites publish a single number with no way to check it. This estimate is built in the open: every salary, rate, and assumption is on the page, and the pahina ng metodolohiya lists every source.
Gaano katumpak ang pagtatantya na ito?
Walang eksaktong pagtatantya ng net worth para sa isang pribadong indibidwal; ang isang ito ay isang modelong binuo mula sa pampublikong data. Ang pagkakaiba ay makikita mo kung paano ito binuo at suriin ang bawat hakbang. Ang grado ng kumpiyansa na malapit sa tuktok ng kalkulasyon ay nagpapakita kung gaano kalaki ang bilang na nakasalalay sa mga ibinunyag na numero, at ang pahina ay nagba-flag kung saan ang isang numero ay nakasandal sa isang pagpapalagay.
Is Angelina Jolie rich compared to the average person?
Yes. A net worth of $200.2 Million is far above the median American household, which sits near $193,000 according to Federal Reserve data.
What is Angelina Jolie's biggest source of wealth?
On this page it is film salaries, the largest line in the calculation at $151.9 Million. The full breakdown, with every other line and its source, is above.
What businesses does Angelina Jolie own?
The stake counted on this page is Atelier Jolie. It is valued from a reported transaction or a revenue multiple, and shown as its own line in the calculation above with the basis next to it.
Galugarin ang Iba Pang Aktor
Tungkol sa NetWorth Explained
We originally created NWE because nobody in the public-figure net worth space showed their work. Magazines and sites threw out big numbers while hiding behind vague claims of “proprietary algorithms” o “insider knowledge.” That’s why we started the world’s only publication that transparently showed every assumption, every variable, and every calculation. We’re still the only ones who do it this way. Magbasa pa tungkol sa NetWorth Explained.