$96.7 Million

Emma Watson Net Worth 2026

Huling na-update August 3, 2026

As of 2026, Emma Watson has an estimated net worth of $96.7 Million, computed film by film and year by year from public records and published rates. Every input, rate, and source behind the number is on this page.

Calculation

  • Ibinunyag ang mga suweldo at dokumentadong backend, bawat isa ay may citation
  • Ang mga hindi isiniwalat na tungkulin na na-modelo mula sa mga inihayag na maihahambing para sa kanilang panahon, banda ng badyet, at yugto ng karera
  • Backend, pag-endorso, at paggawa ng mga kredito na tinantya mula sa mga isiniwalat na median
Emma Watson

Fast Facts

BirthdateApril 15, 1990
BirthplaceParis
BreakthroughHarry Potter and the Philosopher's Stone (2001)
Best KnownHarry Potter and the Philosopher's Stone (2001)

Who Is Emma Watson?

Emma Watson was born April 15, 1990 in Paris, best known for Harry Potter and the Philosopher's Stone (2001). The earnings behind Emma's net worth come from film salaries, backend participation, and endorsement deals.

The model tracks Emma's earning years from 2000 to 2026, with the biggest single year in 2011 at about $33.1 Million of gross income. After representation fees, taxes, and living costs, what stays invested compounds at market returns into an estimated $96.7 Million today.

Data

Ang bawat linya sa ibaba ay kinukuwenta mula sa pampublikong data at sa mga na-publish na talahanayan ng rate sa aming pahina ng metodolohiya. Kumpiyansa: Baitang C. Ang mga dokumentadong numero ay sumasaklaw lamang sa isang maliit na bahagi ng figure na ito, kaya karamihan sa mga ito ay na-modelo mula sa mga nai-publish na mga rate at mga maihahambing (mga grado ay tumatakbo mula sa A, karamihan ay nakadokumento, hanggang C, karamihan ay naka-modelo).

The Calculation

Emma Watson net worth line items
LineAmount
Revenue
Film pay with a disclosed figure (3 of 19 films)
sa bawat pelikula at backend mula sa binanggit na pag-uulat
$45,000,000
Film pay, modeled lead roles (4 of 19 films)
era and budget-band medians of disclosed lead salaries (winsorized, thin cells shrunk toward the era median), blended with this actor's disclosed quote history when available; soft breakthrough blend near the career break year
$28,096,598
Film pay, modeled post-breakthrough supporting roles (5 of 19 films)
12.0% of lead cells: lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio
$7,344,012
Film pay, modeled supporting and early roles (7 of 19 films)
2.5% ng mga median ng panahon: ang pre-stardom rate
$11,433,726
Mga backend point, tinantiya
12% of disclosed lead deals included points, at a median 2.6% of box office; expected value on 3 commercially viable undisclosed lead roles; cash spread over 3 years
$280,879
Mga pag-endorso, tinantyang (3 brand partnership)
3 named partnerships x the $4.0M annual fee from the median disclosed film deal x a 4-year term, spread across the deal years
$48,000,000
Nalalabi, tinatantya
SAG residual rates on post-theatrical receipts assumed at half of box office, split by role share and spread over the ten years after each release
$55,575,774
TV: Ballet Shoes
Pauline Fossil; one engagement for a television film or special; network not identified, priced on the broadcast cell; priced from tv_episode_rates.csv (en.wikipedia.org)
$75,000
TV: The Vicar of Dibley
Reverend Iris; guest default per credited year; broadcast network family; priced from tv_episode_rates.csv (en.wikipedia.org)
$30,000
TV: Harry Potter 20th Anniversary: Return to Hogwarts
Herself; guest default per credited year; streaming network family; priced from tv_episode_rates.csv (en.wikipedia.org)
$30,000
TV: Pickled
Herself; guest default per credited year; network not identified, priced on the broadcast cell; priced from tv_episode_rates.csv (en.wikipedia.org)
$30,000
Puhunan returns sa savings
mixed portfolio: 55% actual 60/40 securities returns (taxed) + 45% US long-run home-price rate on the rest
$49,724,646
Canonbury house, London appreciation, estimated
documented $3,600,000 purchase in 2017 (reported GBP 2.8M, converted at the 2017 average rate), 5.0%/yr UK appreciation, net 7% selling costs; the purchase itself is already counted in savings (estatesgazette.co.uk)
$1,593,847
Meribel chalet, France appreciation, estimated
documented $1,200,000 purchase in 2008, 4.0%/yr France appreciation, net 7% selling costs; the purchase itself is already counted in savings (archive.boston.com)
$1,060,811
Expenses
Mga bayarin sa representasyon
ahente 10% + abogado 5%
-$29,253,965
Taxes
Mga epektibong rate ng UK, taon-taon
-$66,308,987
Personal na paggasta
measured household savings rates by income, times a 88% entertainment-household factor
-$55,190,109
Tinatayang netong halaga$96,652,675

Pelikula ayon sa Pelikula

Emma Watson film-by-film pay
FilmYearRoleBudgetBox officeBinilang ang bayad
Little Women
no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio)
2019Supporting$40,000,000$218,900,000$1,317,416
Beauty and the Beast
disclosed: THR: $3M upfront, escalating to $15M on Maleficent-level box office, which it hit
2017Lead$255,000,000$1,264,000,000$15,000,000
Ang Bilog
no disclosed fee: modeled on the $5.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid); personal blend cut to 11% on a smaller-than-usual budget; blended 11% with this actor's disclosed quote history ($9.0M personal, n=3); raised to 70% of recent similar-budget personal max ($15.0M); cap raised to similar-budget personal max within 50% of budget ($9.0M), capped at $9.0M
2017Lead$18,000,000$40,700,000$8,917,321
Colonia
no disclosed fee: modeled on the $5.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid); personal blend cut to 11% on a smaller-than-usual budget; blended 11% with this actor's disclosed quote history ($15.0M personal, n=2); raised to 70% of recent similar-budget personal max ($15.0M); cap raised to similar-budget personal max within 50% of budget ($7.0M), capped at $7.0M
2015Lead$14,000,000$3,600,000$6,763,189
Regression
no disclosed fee: modeled on the $5.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid); personal blend cut to 11% on a smaller-than-usual budget; blended 11% with this actor's disclosed quote history ($15.0M personal, n=2); raised to 70% of recent similar-budget personal max ($15.0M); cap raised to similar-budget personal max within 50% of budget ($7.5M), capped at $7.5M
2015Lead$15,000,000$17,700,000$7,245,967
Noah
no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $20.0M shrunk median for 2010s/tentpole (n=12) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio)
2014Supporting$160,000,000$359,200,000$2,276,559
The Bling Ring
no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $5.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio), capped at 15% of budget
2013Supporting$8,199,999$20,000,000$1,098,281
This Is the End
no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio)
2013Supporting$41,900,000$126,000,000$1,618,216
The Perks of Being a Wallflower
soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.79): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $5.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid); personal blend cut to 11% on a smaller-than-usual budget; blended 11% with this actor's disclosed quote history ($15.0M personal, n=2); raised to 70% of recent similar-budget personal max ($15.0M); cap raised to similar-budget personal max within 50% of budget ($6.5M), capped at $6.5M vs early terms
2012Lead$13,000,000$33,299,999$5,170,121
Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows – PT2
disclosed: reported $30M combined for the two final films
2011Lead$250,000,000$1,342,000,000$15,000,000
My Week with Marilyn
soft-breakthrough supporting blend (w=0.66)
2011Supporting$10,000,000$35,000,000$1,033,540
Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows – PT1
disclosed: reported $30M combined for the two final films
2010Lead$250,000,000$977,100,000$15,000,000
Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince
soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.34): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $20.0M shrunk median for 2000s/blockbuster (n=1); blended 75% with this actor's disclosed quote history ($15.0M personal, n=1) vs early terms
2009Lead$250,000,000$934,500,000$5,843,087
The Tale of Despereaux
soft-breakthrough supporting blend (w=0.21)
2008Supporting$60,000,000$86,900,000$896,356
Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix
no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $20.0M shrunk median for 2000s/blockbuster (n=1) (pre-stardom rate); soft-breakthrough weight 0.12
2007Lead$200,000,000$942,200,000$2,824,457
Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire
no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $11.8M shrunk median for 2000s/tentpole (n=9) (pre-stardom rate); soft-breakthrough weight 0.03
2005Lead$150,000,000$896,700,000$692,357
Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban
no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $11.8M shrunk median for 2000s/tentpole (n=9) (pre-stardom rate); soft-breakthrough weight 0.02
2004Lead$130,000,000$797,500,000$502,705
Harry Potter and the Chamber of Secrets
no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $11.8M shrunk median for 2000s/tentpole (n=9) (pre-stardom rate); soft-breakthrough weight 0.00
2002Lead$100,000,000$879,800,000$350,818
Harry Potter and the Philosopher's Stone
no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $11.8M shrunk median for 2000s/tentpole (n=9) (pre-stardom rate); soft-breakthrough weight 0.00
2001Lead$125,000,000$1,022,000,000$323,946

Paano gumagana ang mga modelong figure. An undisclosed lead role after the breakthrough gets the median of disclosed lead salaries for its era and budget band, capped at 15% of the film’s budget. Supporting and pre-breakthrough roles get 2.5% of that median, the documented going rate for actors before stardom. Films with no reported budget are treated as small productions. Undocumented backend, endorsements, and producer or director credits enter as separate estimated lines in the calculation above, built from disclosed medians. Every median comes from the published tables on our pahina ng metodolohiya.

Net Worth Sa Paglipas ng Panahon

$25M$50M$75M20002006201220182026$96.7 Million2000: $4,7982001: $59,9282002: $199,7082003: $509,2622004: $920,1092005: $1,428,5702006: $2,193,2012007: $3,301,7832008: $4,165,4832009: $6,148,7492010: $13,570,5622011: $21,675,3162012: $27,830,0122013: $34,716,1372014: $39,105,9942015: $43,042,6692016: $46,611,8182017: $55,857,0652018: $56,931,0812019: $64,275,3092020: $69,874,1552021: $76,532,7422022: $71,479,5402023: $78,450,2412024: $85,269,5452025: $92,001,0692026: $96,652,675

Nakamodelong balanse sa katapusan ng bawat taon, na tumutugma sa talahanayan sa bawat taon sa ibaba.

Taon-taon

Emma Watson year by year model
YearIncomeMga bayarin sa RepHalaga ng buwisSpentSavedBalance
2026$806,513$120,97740%$277,395$133,926$96,652,675
2025$819,166$122,87540%$281,747$136,027$92,001,069
2024$870,890$130,63440%$299,538$144,617$85,269,545
2023$891,914$133,78740%$306,769$148,108$78,450,241
2022$971,695$145,75440%$334,209$161,356$71,479,540
2021$1,713,883$257,08240%$481,793$392,287$76,532,742
2020$2,294,280$344,14240%$644,950$525,133$69,874,155
2019$3,781,598$567,24040%$1,063,052$865,562$64,275,309
2018$3,267,145$490,07240%$918,434$747,810$56,931,081
2017$23,916,791$3,587,51940%$6,723,297$5,474,267$55,857,065
2016$5,308,308$796,24640%$1,492,229$1,215,008$46,611,818
2015$12,989,509$1,948,42640%$3,651,507$2,973,143$43,042,669
2014$9,387,355$1,408,10340%$2,638,898$2,148,653$39,105,994
2013$18,154,508$2,723,17640%$5,103,450$4,155,349$34,716,137
2012$20,506,848$3,076,02740%$5,764,721$4,693,771$27,830,012
2011$33,118,209$4,967,73140%$9,309,926$7,580,361$21,675,316
2010$30,573,359$4,586,00440%$8,594,538$6,997,875$13,570,562
2009$6,798,365$1,019,75540%$1,911,102$1,556,064$6,148,749
2008$5,076,066$761,41040%$1,426,943$1,161,851$4,165,483
2007$4,457,051$668,55840%$1,252,930$1,020,165$3,301,783
2006$2,983,361$447,50440%$838,659$682,856$2,193,201
2005$2,088,034$313,20540%$586,971$477,926$1,428,570
2004$1,689,270$253,39040%$474,874$386,654$920,109
2003$1,280,481$192,07240%$359,958$293,087$509,262
2002$852,641$127,89640%$293,261$141,586$199,708
2001$332,008$49,80140%$114,192$55,132$59,928
2000$97,184$14,57840%$44,766$4,798$4,798

Model Notes

  • RESIDENCE PROXY: UK resident throughout; UK effective rates before 2010 fall back to the model's 45% floor
  • salary comps: 2 disclosed lead fee(s) flagged as non-market outliers (scale / far-below-quote) and excluded from era medians
  • UK filing check: attributable company net assets $-360,277 (Breadcrumb Productions Limited (14330773, GBP -324,209 at 2024-12-31, band mid 88%)) sit below the modeled balance; counted as a documented floor, not added
I-reproduce ang numerong ito. Ang pagtatantya ng netong halaga ay dapat na mai-reproducible sa paraan ng isang siyentipikong paghahanap: ang parehong mga pampublikong input at ang parehong mga nai-publish na mga rate ay dapat palaging magbigay ng parehong sagot. Ang mga badyet ng pelikula at takilya ay pampublikong pag-uulat. Ang bawat isiniwalat na suweldo, rate ng bayad, rate ng buwis, rate ng pagtitipid, at benchmark na pagbabalik ay nai-publish na may mga pagsipi sa aming pahina ng metodolohiya. Undisclosed lead roles use the median of disclosed salaries for their era and budget band, capped at 15% of the film’s budget. Supporting and early-career roles use the documented pre-stardom fraction of that median. Undocumented backend, endorsements, and hyphenate credits enter as estimated lines from disclosed medians. Apply the rates year by year as shown above and you will land on $96.7 Million.

Pamamaraan

We rebuild Emma’s career as a yearly time series. Disclosed salaries and documented backend enter as reported, with citations. Undisclosed lead roles get the median of disclosed salaries for their era and budget band, capped at 15% of the film’s budget. Supporting roles and roles from before the breakthrough get 2.5% of that median, the going-rate ratio measured from disclosed pre-stardom deals. Films with no reported budget are treated as small productions, and every role is estimated unless a source documents it was unpaid. Representation fees come out at sourced rates, taxes follow the eras actually lived through, spending follows measured household savings behavior unless court documents say otherwise, and what remains compounds at real market returns. Undocumented backend enters as an expected value from disclosed deals, endorsements at the median disclosed ambassador fee, and producer or director credits at union-scale floors.

Ang buong modelo, bawat talahanayan ng rate, at kung paano nasuri ang aming mga pagtatantya laban sa mga tunay na deal ay nasa pahina ng metodolohiya.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Emma Watson's net worth in 2026?

As of 2026, Emma Watson's net worth is an estimated $96.7 Million. The estimate is built film by film from disclosed salaries and documented backend, then year by year: income, minus representation fees and taxes, minus spending, compounded at real market returns.

How does Emma Watson make money?

Disclosed Harry Potter paychecks ($30M for the two Deathly Hallows films) and a Beauty and the Beast deal that reached a reported $15M. Six earlier Potter films model from the salary table's pre-stardom deals, and her fashion and beauty campaigns enter as an estimated endorsement line.

How is Emma Watson's net worth calculated?

Disclosed paydays enter as reported, with citations. Undisclosed lead roles use the median of disclosed salaries for their era and budget band, capped at 15% of the film's budget, and supporting or early-career roles use the documented pre-stardom fraction of that median. We subtract sourced representation fees, taxes for the years Emma actually worked, and spending from measured savings behavior, then compound at real market returns. Undocumented backend, endorsements, and producing credits enter as estimated lines from disclosed medians. Every rate and source is published.

How much does Emma Watson make per film?

Nag-iiba-iba ito ayon sa papel at panahon, at ang talahanayan ng film-by-film sa itaas ay naglilista ng bayad na binibilang para sa bawat pamagat. Ang mga isiniwalat na araw ng suweldo ay pumasok tulad ng iniulat. Ang mga hindi nasabi na tungkulin ay na-modelo mula sa kung ano ang maihahambing na mga aktor na kinita sa parehong panahon at hanay ng badyet, na may mga pangunahing tungkulin pagkatapos ng pambihirang tagumpay na kumikita ng pinakamaraming at sumusuporta o maagang mga tungkulin ay isang dokumentadong bahagi nito.

Bakit napakataas ng rate ng buwis, at hindi ba ito iniiwasan ng mga aktor sa isang loan-out na kumpanya?

Tax comes out at the effective rate for where Emma lived each year, which is the rate shown in the year-by-year table. In a high-tax state like California, combined federal and state income tax reaches close to half of a top earner's income, so those years run in the mid-40s percent. A loan-out company, the corporation many actors run their income through, does not lower the tax on the money they take home. Its real advantage is deducting business costs such as agent, manager, and attorney fees, and the model already subtracts those as a separate line before any tax is applied. High-earning performers also fall outside the pass-through business deduction that other company owners can claim, so it buys them no rate cut.

Bakit naiiba ang figure na ito sa ibang net worth na mga site?

Most sites publish a single number with no way to check it. This estimate is built in the open: every salary, rate, and assumption is on the page, and the pahina ng metodolohiya lists every source.

Gaano katumpak ang pagtatantya na ito?

Walang eksaktong pagtatantya ng net worth para sa isang pribadong indibidwal; ang isang ito ay isang modelong binuo mula sa pampublikong data. Ang pagkakaiba ay makikita mo kung paano ito binuo at suriin ang bawat hakbang. Ang grado ng kumpiyansa na malapit sa tuktok ng kalkulasyon ay nagpapakita kung gaano kalaki ang bilang na nakasalalay sa mga ibinunyag na numero, at ang pahina ay nagba-flag kung saan ang isang numero ay nakasandal sa isang pagpapalagay.

Is Emma Watson rich compared to the average person?

Yes. A net worth of $96.7 Million is far above the median American household, which sits near $193,000 according to Federal Reserve data.

What is Emma Watson's biggest source of wealth?

On this page it is residuals, the largest line in the calculation at $55.6 Million. The full breakdown, with every other line and its source, is above.

How much does Emma Watson make from endorsements?

The model counts $48.0 Million in career endorsement income for Emma: 3 named partnerships x the $4.0M annual fee from the median disclosed film deal x a 4-year term, spread across the deal years. It is an estimate, since the individual deal values are not all public, and it sits as its own line in the calculation above.

Galugarin ang Iba Pang Aktor

Tungkol sa NetWorth Explained

We originally created NWE because nobody in the public-figure net worth space showed their work. Magazines and sites threw out big numbers while hiding behind vague claims of “proprietary algorithms” o “insider knowledge.” That’s why we started the world’s only publication that transparently showed every assumption, every variable, and every calculation. We’re still the only ones who do it this way. Magbasa pa tungkol sa NetWorth Explained.