Chris Pine Patrimonio neto 2026
Actualizado August 3, 2026
As of 2026, Chris Pine has an estimated net worth of $168.3 Million, computed film by film and year by year from public records and published rates. Every input, rate, and source behind the number is on this page.
Calculation
- Salarios divulgados y backend documentado, cada uno con una cita.
- Roles no revelados modelados a partir de comparables revelados para su época, rango de presupuesto y etapa profesional.
- Backend, patrocinios y créditos de producción estimados a partir de medianas divulgadas
Fast Facts
| Birthdate | August 26, 1980 |
|---|---|
| Birthplace | Los Angeles |
| Breakthrough | Star Trek (2009) |
| Best Known | Star Trek (2009) |
Who Is Chris Pine?
Chris Pine was born August 26, 1980 in Los Angeles, best known for Star Trek (2009). The earnings behind Chris's net worth come from film salaries, backend participation, and endorsement deals.
The model tracks Chris's earning years from 2002 to 2026, with the biggest single year in 2013 at about $42.8 Million of gross income. After representation fees, taxes, and living costs, what stays invested compounds at market returns into an estimated $168.3 Million today.
Data
Cada línea a continuación se calcula a partir de datos públicos y las tablas de tarifas publicadas en nuestro página de metodología. Confianza: Grado C. Las cifras documentadas cubren sólo una pequeña parte de esta cifra, por lo que la mayor parte está modelada a partir de tasas publicadas y comparables (las calificaciones van desde A, en su mayoría documentada, hasta C, en su mayoría modelada).
The Calculation
| Line | Amount |
|---|---|
| Revenue | |
| Film pay, modeled lead roles (41 of 68 films) era and budget-band medians of disclosed lead salaries (winsorized, thin cells shrunk toward the era median), blended with this actor's disclosed quote history when available; soft breakthrough blend near the career break year | $384,692,800 |
| Film pay, modeled post-breakthrough supporting roles (13 of 68 films) 12.0% of lead cells: lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio | $17,484,801 |
| Film pay, modeled supporting and early roles (14 of 68 films) 2,5% de las medianas de la época: la tasa previa al estrellato | $11,940,636 |
| Puntos backend, estimados 12% of disclosed lead deals included points, at a median 2.6% of box office; expected value on 32 commercially viable undisclosed lead roles; cash spread over 3 years; 18 film(s) used band-specific box-office/budget multiples as a gross proxy | $17,582,329 |
| Respaldos, estimados (1 asociación de marca) 1 named partnerships x the $4.0M annual fee from the median disclosed film deal x a 4-year term, spread across the deal years | $16,000,000 |
| Residuos, estimados SAG residual rates on post-theatrical receipts assumed at half of box office, split by role share and spread over the ten years after each release; 35 film(s) used band-specific box-office proxies | $42,435,318 |
| TV: ER Levine; guest default per credited year; broadcast network family; priced from tv_episode_rates.csv (en.wikipedia.org) | $30,000 |
| TV: The Guardian Lonnie Grandy; guest default per credited year; broadcast network family; priced from tv_episode_rates.csv (en.wikipedia.org) | $30,000 |
| TV: CSI: Miami Tommy Chandler; guest default per credited year; broadcast network family; priced from tv_episode_rates.csv (en.wikipedia.org) | $30,000 |
| TV: American Dreams Joey Tremain; guest default per credited year; broadcast network family; priced from tv_episode_rates.csv (en.wikipedia.org) | $30,000 |
| TV: Six Feet Under Young Sam Hoviak; guest default per credited year; cable network family; priced from tv_episode_rates.csv (en.wikipedia.org) | $30,000 |
| TV: Surrender, Dorothy Shawn Best; one engagement for a television film or special; network not identified, priced on the broadcast cell; priced from tv_episode_rates.csv (en.wikipedia.org) | $75,000 |
| TV: Saturday Night Live Himself / Host; stated episode count; variety format tier; priced from tv_episode_rates.csv (en.wikipedia.org) | $29,700 |
| TV: Robot Chicken Capt. Jake / Norman Bates / James T. Kirk; stated episode count; animation format tier; priced from tv_episode_rates.csv (en.wikipedia.org) | $36,120 |
| TV: Wet Hot American Summer: First Day of Camp Eric; stated episode count; streaming network family; priced from tv_episode_rates.csv (en.wikipedia.org) | $2,000,000 |
| TV: SuperMansion Dr. Devizo / Robo-Dino; stated episode count; network not identified, priced on the broadcast cell; priced from tv_episode_rates.csv (en.wikipedia.org) | $750,000 |
| TV: Angie Tribeca Dr. Thomas Hornbein; stated episode count; cable network family; priced from tv_episode_rates.csv (en.wikipedia.org) | $225,000 |
| TV: Breakthrough Narrator; guest default per credited year; network not identified, priced on the broadcast cell; priced from tv_episode_rates.csv (en.wikipedia.org) | $30,000 |
| TV: Wet Hot American Summer: Ten Years Later Eric; stated episode count; streaming network family; priced from tv_episode_rates.csv (en.wikipedia.org) | $1,600,000 |
| TV: I Am the Night Jay Singletary; stated episode count; cable network family; priced from tv_episode_rates.csv (en.wikipedia.org) | $2,100,000 |
| TV: American Dad! Alistair Covax; guest default per credited year; animation format tier; priced from tv_episode_rates.csv (en.wikipedia.org) | $24,000 |
| TV: Home Movie: The Princess Bride Westley; guest default per credited year; streaming network family; priced from tv_episode_rates.csv (en.wikipedia.org) | $30,000 |
| Rentabilidad de la inversión sobre los ahorros mixed portfolio: 55% actual 60/40 securities returns (taxed) + 45% US long-run home-price rate on the rest | $66,344,539 |
| Expenses | |
| Honorarios de representación agente 10% + abogado 5% | -$73,424,738 |
| Taxes Tasas efectivas entre EE. UU. y CA, año tras año | -$188,754,022 |
| Gastos personales measured household savings rates by income, times a 88% entertainment-household factor | -$125,328,204 |
| Patrimonio neto estimado | $168,335,826 |
Película por película
| Film | Year | Role | Budget | Taquillas | Pago contado |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alpha Gang no disclosed fee: modeled on the $23.8M shrunk median for 2020s/large (n=2), capped at $10.5M | 2026 | Lead | $70,000,000 | – | $10,499,881 |
| Carousel no disclosed fee: modeled on the $23.8M shrunk median for 2020s/large (n=2), capped at $10.5M | 2026 | Lead | $70,000,000 | $3,750,000 | $10,499,881 |
| TBA no disclosed fee: modeled on the $23.8M shrunk median for 2020s/large (n=2), capped at $10.5M | 2026 | Lead | $70,000,000 | – | $10,499,881 |
| The Kidnapping of Arabella no disclosed fee: modeled on the $23.8M shrunk median for 2020s/large (n=2), capped at $10.5M | 2025 | Lead | $70,000,000 | $86,452 | $10,499,769 |
| Ariana DeBose no disclosed fee: modeled on the $23.8M shrunk median for 2020s/large (n=2), capped at $10.5M | 2023 | Lead | $70,000,000 | – | $10,499,124 |
| Dungeons & Dragons: Honor Among Thieves no disclosed fee: modeled on the $16.4M shrunk median for 2020s/tentpole (n=5) | 2023 | Lead | $150,000,000 | $208,200,000 | $16,427,155 |
| Poolman no disclosed fee: modeled on the $23.8M shrunk median for 2020s/large (n=2), capped at $10.5M | 2023 | Lead | $70,000,000 | $153,325 | $10,499,124 |
| Wish no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $16.4M shrunk median for 2020s/tentpole (n=5) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio) | 2023 | Supporting | $187,500,000 | $255,000,000 | $1,971,291 |
| All the Old Knives no disclosed fee: modeled on the $23.8M shrunk median for 2020s/large (n=2), capped at $10.5M | 2022 | Lead | $70,000,000 | – | $10,498,294 |
| Don't Worry Darling no disclosed fee: modeled on the $21.7M shrunk median for 2020s/mid (n=1), capped at $3.0M | 2022 | Lead | $20,000,000 | $87,609,403 | $2,999,577 |
| Doula no disclosed fee: modeled on the $23.8M shrunk median for 2020s/large (n=2), capped at $10.5M | 2022 | Lead | $70,000,000 | – | $10,498,294 |
| The Contractor no disclosed fee: modeled on the $23.8M shrunk median for 2020s/large (n=2), capped at $10.5M | 2022 | Lead | $70,000,000 | $2,100,000 | $10,498,294 |
| Película casera: La princesa prometida no disclosed fee: modeled on the $23.8M shrunk median for 2020s/large (n=2), capped at $10.5M | 2020 | Lead | $70,000,000 | – | $10,493,532 |
| Wonder Woman 1984 no disclosed fee: modeled on the $18.0M shrunk median for 2020s/blockbuster (n=8) | 2020 | Lead | $200,000,000 | $169,600,000 | $17,988,540 |
| American Dad! no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio) | 2019 | Supporting | $40,000,000 | – | $1,318,672 |
| I Am the Night no disclosed fee: modeled on the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3), capped at $6.0M | 2019 | Lead | $40,000,000 | – | $5,992,723 |
| Love, Antosha no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio) | 2019 | Supporting | $40,000,000 | $50,168 | $1,318,672 |
| A Wrinkle in Time no disclosed fee: modeled on the $20.0M shrunk median for 2010s/tentpole (n=12), capped at $17.2M | 2018 | Lead | $115,000,000 | $133,000,000 | $17,208,584 |
| Outlaw King no disclosed fee: modeled on the $20.0M shrunk median for 2010s/tentpole (n=12), capped at $18.0M | 2018 | Lead | $120,000,000 | – | $17,956,729 |
| Spider-Man: Into the Spider-Verse no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $20.0M shrunk median for 2010s/large (n=8) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio) | 2018 | Supporting | $90,000,000 | $363,800,000 | $2,395,302 |
| Angie Tribeca no disclosed fee: modeled on the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3), capped at $6.0M | 2017 | Lead | $40,000,000 | – | $5,972,493 |
| Breakthrough no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio) | 2017 | Supporting | $40,000,000 | – | $1,314,979 |
| Wet Hot American Summer: Ten Years Later no disclosed fee: modeled on the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3), capped at $6.0M | 2017 | Lead | $40,000,000 | – | $5,972,493 |
| Wonder Woman no disclosed fee: modeled on the $20.0M shrunk median for 2010s/tentpole (n=12) | 2017 | Lead | $149,000,000 | $824,000,000 | $19,906,307 |
| Encore: Movie Partners Sing Broadway no disclosed fee: modeled on the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3), capped at $6.0M | 2016 | Lead | $40,000,000 | – | $5,946,666 |
| For the Love of Spock no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio) | 2016 | Supporting | $40,000,000 | – | $1,310,265 |
| Hell or High Water no disclosed fee: modeled on the $5.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid), capped at $1.8M | 2016 | Lead | $12,000,000 | $37,900,000 | $1,784,396 |
| Star Trek Beyond no disclosed fee: modeled on the $20.0M shrunk median for 2010s/tentpole (n=12) | 2016 | Lead | $185,000,000 | $343,471,816 | $19,818,339 |
| The Finest Hours no disclosed fee: modeled on the $20.0M shrunk median for 2010s/large (n=8), capped at $11.2M | 2016 | Lead | $75,000,000 | $52,100,000 | $11,149,853 |
| Figures of Speech no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio) | 2015 | Supporting | $40,000,000 | – | $1,301,204 |
| SuperMansion no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio) | 2015 | Supporting | $40,000,000 | – | $1,301,204 |
| Wet Hot American Summer: First Day of Camp no disclosed fee: modeled on the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3), capped at $6.0M | 2015 | Lead | $40,000,000 | – | $5,897,029 |
| Z for Zachariah no disclosed fee: modeled on the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3), capped at $6.0M | 2015 | Lead | $40,000,000 | $121,461 | $5,897,029 |
| Billy Magnussen no disclosed fee: modeled on the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3), capped at $6.0M | 2014 | Lead | $40,000,000 | – | $5,802,801 |
| Emily Blunt no disclosed fee: modeled on the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3), capped at $6.0M | 2014 | Lead | $40,000,000 | – | $5,802,801 |
| Horrible Bosses 2 no disclosed fee: modeled on the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3), capped at $6.3M | 2014 | Lead | $42,000,000 | $107,700,000 | $6,092,468 |
| Into the Woods no disclosed fee: modeled on the $20.0M shrunk median for 2010s/large (n=8), capped at $7.5M | 2014 | Lead | $50,000,000 | $212,900,000 | $7,258,884 |
| Jack Ryan: Shadow Recruit no disclosed fee: modeled on the $20.0M shrunk median for 2010s/large (n=8), capped at $9.0M | 2014 | Lead | $60,000,000 | $135,503,748 | $8,707,216 |
| Stretch no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $5.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio) | 2014 | Supporting | $5,000,000 | – | $583,639 |
| Queenie Eye no disclosed fee: modeled on the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3), capped at $6.0M | 2013 | Lead | $40,000,000 | – | $5,628,052 |
| Star Trek no disclosed fee: modeled on the $20.0M shrunk median for 2010s/tentpole (n=12) | 2013 | Lead | $187,500,000 | $467,400,000 | $18,733,101 |
| Star Trek Into Darkness no disclosed fee: modeled on the $20.0M shrunk median for 2010s/tentpole (n=12) | 2013 | Lead | $190,000,000 | $467,400,000 | $18,733,101 |
| Celeste and Jesse Forever no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $5.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio), capped at 15% of budget | 2012 | Supporting | $840,000 | $3,600,000 | $125,881 |
| People Like Us no disclosed fee: modeled on the $5.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid), capped at $2.4M | 2012 | Lead | $16,000,000 | $12,600,000 | $2,128,813 |
| Rise of the Guardians no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $20.0M shrunk median for 2010s/tentpole (n=12) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio) | 2012 | Supporting | $145,000,000 | $306,900,000 | $2,173,514 |
| The Ivy Walls no disclosed fee: modeled on the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3), capped at $6.0M | 2012 | Lead | $40,000,000 | – | $5,317,563 |
| This Means War no disclosed fee: modeled on the $20.0M shrunk median for 2010s/large (n=8), capped at $9.8M | 2012 | Lead | $65,000,000 | $156,500,000 | $8,647,373 |
| Quantum Quest: A Cassini Space Odyssey soft-breakthrough supporting blend (w=0.66) | 2010 | Supporting | $40,000,000 | – | $965,490 |
| The Lieutenant of Inishmore soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.66): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3), capped at $6.0M vs early terms | 2010 | Lead | $40,000,000 | – | $4,057,830 |
| Unstoppable soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.66): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $20.0M shrunk median for 2010s/large (n=8), capped at $13.9M vs early terms | 2010 | Lead | $92,500,000 | $167,800,000 | $9,337,616 |
| Beyond All Boundaries soft-breakthrough supporting blend (w=0.50) | 2009 | Supporting | $40,000,000 | – | $1,404,688 |
| Carriers soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.50): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $19.4M shrunk median for 2000s/mid (n=2), capped at $6.0M vs early terms | 2009 | Lead | $40,000,000 | $5,800,000 | $3,242,188 |
| Farragut North soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.50): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $19.4M shrunk median for 2000s/mid (n=2), capped at $6.0M vs early terms | 2009 | Lead | $40,000,000 | – | $3,242,188 |
| Star Trek soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.50): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $11.8M shrunk median for 2000s/tentpole (n=9) vs early terms | 2009 | Lead | $150,000,000 | $385,700,000 | $6,056,818 |
| Bottle Shock soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.34): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $18.8M median for its era and nearest band (mid), capped at $0.8M vs early terms | 2008 | Lead | $5,000,000 | $4,600,000 | $564,162 |
| Fat Pig soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.21): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $19.4M shrunk median for 2000s/mid (n=2), capped at $6.0M vs early terms | 2007 | Lead | $40,000,000 | – | $1,634,981 |
| Blind Dating no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $19.4M shrunk median for 2000s/mid (n=2) (pre-stardom rate); soft-breakthrough weight 0.12 | 2006 | Lead | $40,000,000 | $945,718 | $1,141,854 |
| Just My Luck no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $19.4M shrunk median for 2000s/mid (n=2) (pre-stardom rate); soft-breakthrough weight 0.12 | 2006 | Lead | $28,000,000 | $38,100,000 | $927,288 |
| Robot Chicken no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $19.4M shrunk median for 2000s/mid (n=2) (pre-stardom rate) | 2006 | Supporting | $40,000,000 | – | $703,783 |
| Smokin' Aces no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $18.8M median for its era and nearest band (mid) (pre-stardom rate); soft-breakthrough weight 0.12 | 2006 | Lead | $17,000,000 | $57,300,000 | $716,841 |
| Surrender, Dorothy no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $19.4M shrunk median for 2000s/mid (n=2) (pre-stardom rate); soft-breakthrough weight 0.12 | 2006 | Lead | $40,000,000 | – | $1,141,854 |
| The Atheist no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $19.4M shrunk median for 2000s/mid (n=2) (pre-stardom rate); soft-breakthrough weight 0.12 | 2006 | Lead | $40,000,000 | – | $1,141,854 |
| Six Feet Under no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $19.4M shrunk median for 2000s/mid (n=2) (pre-stardom rate); soft-breakthrough weight 0.06 | 2005 | Lead | $40,000,000 | – | $842,721 |
| American Dreams no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $19.4M shrunk median for 2000s/mid (n=2) (pre-stardom rate); soft-breakthrough weight 0.03 | 2004 | Lead | $40,000,000 | – | $674,362 |
| The Princess Diaries 2: Royal Engagement no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $19.4M shrunk median for 2000s/mid (n=2) (pre-stardom rate); soft-breakthrough weight 0.03 | 2004 | Lead | $45,000,000 | $135,300,000 | $700,196 |
| CSI: Miami no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $19.4M shrunk median for 2000s/mid (n=2) (pre-stardom rate); soft-breakthrough weight 0.02 | 2003 | Lead | $40,000,000 | – | $583,580 |
| ER no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $19.4M shrunk median for 2000s/mid (n=2) (pre-stardom rate); soft-breakthrough weight 0.02 | 2003 | Lead | $40,000,000 | – | $583,580 |
| The Guardian no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $19.4M shrunk median for 2000s/mid (n=2) (pre-stardom rate); soft-breakthrough weight 0.02 | 2003 | Lead | $40,000,000 | – | $583,580 |
Cómo funcionan las figuras modeladas. An undisclosed lead role after the breakthrough gets the median of disclosed lead salaries for its era and budget band, capped at 15% of the film’s budget. Supporting and pre-breakthrough roles get 2.5% of that median, the documented going rate for actors before stardom. Films with no reported budget are treated as small productions. Undocumented backend, endorsements, and producer or director credits enter as separate estimated lines in the calculation above, built from disclosed medians. Every median comes from the published tables on our página de metodología.
Patrimonio neto Over Time
Saldo modelado al final de cada año, que coincide con la tabla año por año a continuación.
Año tras año
| Year | Income | Honorarios de representante | Tasa impositiva | Spent | Saved | Balance |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | $24,300,460 | $3,645,069 | 45% | $6,261,888 | $5,098,577 | $168,335,826 |
| 2025 | $19,172,651 | $2,875,898 | 45% | $4,940,524 | $4,022,691 | $159,997,304 |
| 2024 | $6,271,104 | $940,666 | 45% | $1,615,976 | $1,315,765 | $145,384,650 |
| 2023 | $31,046,717 | $4,657,008 | 45% | $8,000,304 | $6,514,036 | $133,401,624 |
| 2022 | $39,178,084 | $5,876,713 | 45% | $10,095,644 | $8,220,111 | $116,462,826 |
| 2021 | $13,239,155 | $1,985,873 | 45% | $3,411,545 | $2,777,760 | $116,157,077 |
| 2020 | $23,311,570 | $3,496,736 | 45% | $6,007,065 | $4,891,094 | $104,574,317 |
| 2019 | $21,118,321 | $3,167,748 | 45% | $5,441,896 | $4,430,919 | $92,788,655 |
| 2018 | $33,534,541 | $5,030,181 | 45% | $8,641,382 | $7,036,016 | $79,859,632 |
| 2017 | $40,040,204 | $6,006,031 | 47% | $9,942,607 | $8,095,505 | $72,400,796 |
| 2016 | $41,122,805 | $6,168,421 | 47% | $10,211,434 | $8,314,390 | $59,756,978 |
| 2015 | $27,791,500 | $4,168,725 | 47% | $6,901,063 | $5,619,008 | $48,901,008 |
| 2014 | $31,742,919 | $4,761,438 | 47% | $7,882,262 | $6,417,923 | $42,255,508 |
| 2013 | $42,805,038 | $6,420,756 | 47% | $10,629,159 | $8,654,511 | $33,775,267 |
| 2012 | $31,198,416 | $4,679,762 | 43% | $8,331,737 | $6,783,896 | $23,004,872 |
| 2011 | $11,146,897 | $1,672,035 | 43% | $2,976,850 | $2,423,821 | $15,205,549 |
| 2010 | $15,530,365 | $2,329,555 | 43% | $4,147,483 | $3,376,978 | $12,309,060 |
| 2009 | $19,021,311 | $2,853,197 | 43% | $5,079,763 | $4,136,062 | $8,360,974 |
| 2008 | $5,058,408 | $758,761 | 43% | $1,350,880 | $1,099,918 | $3,856,496 |
| 2007 | $1,751,957 | $262,794 | 43% | $467,871 | $380,952 | $3,030,205 |
| 2006 | $4,894,837 | $734,226 | 43% | $1,307,198 | $1,064,351 | $2,534,370 |
| 2005 | $2,598,349 | $389,752 | 43% | $693,906 | $564,994 | $1,378,370 |
| 2004 | $1,369,533 | $205,430 | 43% | $365,742 | $297,796 | $784,793 |
| 2003 | $1,727,886 | $259,183 | 43% | $461,443 | $375,718 | $461,905 |
| 2002 | $525,222 | $78,783 | 46% | $162,582 | $78,495 | $78,495 |
Model Notes
- PROXY DE RESIDENCIA: residencia no obtenida individualmente para este lote; El valor predeterminado de EE. UU.-CA se aplica hasta que se documente
- salary comps: 2 disclosed lead fee(s) flagged as non-market outliers (scale / far-below-quote) and excluded from era medians
- Crédito de la imagen: Wikimedia Commons via Wikipedia (Chris Pine)
Metodología
We rebuild Chris’s career as a yearly time series. Disclosed salaries and documented backend enter as reported, with citations. Undisclosed lead roles get the median of disclosed salaries for their era and budget band, capped at 15% of the film’s budget. Supporting roles and roles from before the breakthrough get 2.5% of that median, the going-rate ratio measured from disclosed pre-stardom deals. Films with no reported budget are treated as small productions, and every role is estimated unless a source documents it was unpaid. Representation fees come out at sourced rates, taxes follow the eras actually lived through, spending follows measured household savings behavior unless court documents say otherwise, and what remains compounds at real market returns. Undocumented backend enters as an expected value from disclosed deals, endorsements at the median disclosed ambassador fee, and producer or director credits at union-scale floors.
El modelo completo, cada tabla de tarifas y cómo nuestras estimaciones se han comparado con ofertas reales están en el sitio. página de metodología.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is Chris Pine's net worth in 2026?
As of 2026, Chris Pine's net worth is an estimated $168.3 Million. The estimate is built film by film from disclosed salaries and documented backend, then year by year: income, minus representation fees and taxes, minus spending, compounded at real market returns.
How does Chris Pine make money?
Salarios cinematográficos y participación backend documentada.
How is Chris Pine's net worth calculated?
Los días de pago divulgados ingresan según lo informado, con citaciones. Los papeles principales no revelados utilizan la mediana de los salarios revelados para su época y banda presupuestaria, con un límite del 15% del presupuesto de la película, y los papeles secundarios o de inicio de carrera utilizan la fracción documentada previa al estrellato de esa mediana. Restamos los honorarios de representación, los impuestos de los años en los que Chris realmente trabajó y el gasto del comportamiento de ahorro medido, y luego componemos los rendimientos reales del mercado. Backend indocumentados, respaldos y créditos de producción ingresan como líneas estimadas a partir de las medianas divulgadas. Se publican todas las tarifas y fuentes.
How much does Chris Pine make per film?
Varía según el papel y la época, y la tabla película por película anterior enumera el pago contado para cada título. Los días de pago divulgados ingresan según lo informado. Los papeles no revelados se modelan a partir de lo que ganaron actores comparables en la misma época y rango de presupuesto, siendo los papeles principales después del gran avance los que ganan más y los papeles secundarios o iniciales una fracción documentada de eso.
¿Por qué el tipo impositivo es tan alto y los actores no lo evitan con una empresa de préstamo?
El impuesto se aplica a la tasa efectiva del lugar donde vivió Chris cada año, que es la tasa que se muestra en la tabla año por año. En un estado con impuestos altos como California, el impuesto sobre la renta federal y estatal combinado alcanza cerca de la mitad de los ingresos de una persona con mayores ingresos, por lo que esos años rondan el 40 por ciento. Una empresa de préstamos, la corporación a través de la cual muchos actores administran sus ingresos, no reduce el impuesto sobre el dinero que se llevan a casa. Su verdadera ventaja es deducir los costos comerciales, como los honorarios de agentes, gerentes y abogados, y el modelo ya los resta como una línea separada antes de aplicar cualquier impuesto. Las empresas con altos ingresos también quedan fuera de la deducción empresarial de transferencia que otros propietarios de empresas pueden reclamar, por lo que no les permite obtener ningún recorte de tasas.
¿Por qué esta cifra es diferente a la de otros sitios de patrimonio neto?
Most sites publish a single number with no way to check it. This estimate is built in the open: every salary, rate, and assumption is on the page, and the página de metodología lists every source.
¿Qué tan precisa es esta estimación?
Ninguna estimación del patrimonio neto de un particular es exacta; éste es un modelo construido a partir de datos públicos. La diferencia es que puedes ver cómo se construyó y comprobar cada paso. El grado de confianza cerca de la parte superior del cálculo muestra qué parte de la cifra se basa en números revelados, y la página indica dónde se apoya un número en una suposición.
Is Chris Pine rich compared to the average person?
Yes. A net worth of $168.3 Million is far above the median American household, which sits near $193,000 according to Federal Reserve data.
What is Chris Pine's biggest source of wealth?
On this page it is film salaries, the largest line in the calculation at $384.7 Million. The full breakdown, with every other line and its source, is above.
How much does Chris Pine make from endorsements?
The model counts $16.0 Million in career endorsement income for Chris: 1 named partnerships x the $4.0M annual fee from the median disclosed film deal x a 4-year term, spread across the deal years. It is an estimate, since the individual deal values are not all public, and it sits as its own line in the calculation above.
Explora otros actores
Acerca de NetWorth Explained
We originally created NWE because nobody in the public-figure net worth space showed their work. Magazines and sites threw out big numbers while hiding behind vague claims of “proprietary algorithms” o “insider knowledge.” That’s why we started the world’s only publication that transparently showed every assumption, every variable, and every calculation. We’re still the only ones who do it this way. Leer más sobre NetWorth Explained.