$56.9 Million

Daisy Ridley Patrimonio neto 2026

Actualizado August 3, 2026

As of 2026, Daisy Ridley has an estimated net worth of $56.9 Million, computed film by film and year by year from public records and published rates. Every input, rate, and source behind the number is on this page.

Calculation

  • Salarios divulgados y backend documentado, cada uno con una cita.
  • Roles no revelados modelados a partir de comparables revelados para su época, rango de presupuesto y etapa profesional.
  • Backend, patrocinios y créditos de producción estimados a partir de medianas divulgadas
Daisy Ridley

Fast Facts

Birthdaten / A
Birthplacen / A
Breakthroughcareer breakthrough modeled at 2015
Best KnownStar Wars: The Last Jedi

Who Is Daisy Ridley?

Daisy Ridley is best known for Star Wars: The Last Jedi. The earnings behind Daisy's net worth come from film salaries, backend participation, and endorsement deals.

The model tracks Daisy's earning years from 2009 to 2026, with the biggest single year in 2017 at about $25.0 Million of gross income. After representation fees, taxes, and living costs, what stays invested compounds at market returns into an estimated $56.9 Million today.

Data

Cada línea a continuación se calcula a partir de datos públicos y las tablas de tarifas publicadas en nuestro página de metodología. Confianza: Grado C. Las cifras documentadas cubren sólo una pequeña parte de esta cifra, por lo que la mayor parte está modelada a partir de tasas publicadas y comparables (las calificaciones van desde A, en su mayoría documentada, hasta C, en su mayoría modelada).

The Calculation

Daisy Ridley net worth line items
LineAmount
Revenue
Film pay, modeled lead roles (26 of 50 films)
era and budget-band medians of disclosed lead salaries (winsorized, thin cells shrunk toward the era median), blended with this actor's disclosed quote history when available; soft breakthrough blend near the career break year
$107,448,580
Film pay, modeled post-breakthrough supporting roles (9 of 50 films)
12.0% of lead cells: lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio
$19,356,719
Film pay, modeled supporting and early roles (15 of 50 films)
2,5% de las medianas de la época: la tasa previa al estrellato
$10,106,854
Puntos backend, estimados
12% of disclosed lead deals included points, at a median 2.6% of box office; expected value on 9 commercially viable undisclosed lead roles; cash spread over 3 years
$14,900,625
Respaldos, estimados (1 asociación de marca)
1 named partnerships x the $4.0M annual fee from the median disclosed film deal x a 4-year term, spread across the deal years
$16,000,000
Residuos, estimados
SAG residual rates on post-theatrical receipts assumed at half of box office, split by role share and spread over the ten years after each release
$29,699,266
TV: Casualty
Fran Bedingfield; guest default per credited year; broadcast network family; priced from tv_episode_rates.csv (en.wikipedia.org)
$30,000
TV: Youngers
Jessie; guest default per credited year; animation format tier; priced from tv_episode_rates.csv (en.wikipedia.org)
$24,000
TV: Toast of London
Charlotte; guest default per credited year; broadcast network family; priced from tv_episode_rates.csv (en.wikipedia.org)
$30,000
TV: Silent Witness
Hannah Kennedy; guest default per credited year; broadcast network family; priced from tv_episode_rates.csv (en.wikipedia.org)
$30,000
TV: Mr. Selfridge
Roxy Starlet; guest default per credited year; broadcast network family; priced from tv_episode_rates.csv (en.wikipedia.org)
$30,000
TV: Star Wars Forces of Destiny
Rey; stated episode count; animation format tier; priced from tv_episode_rates.csv (en.wikipedia.org)
$120,000
TV: We Were There
Narrator; guest default per credited year; cable network family; priced from tv_episode_rates.csv (en.wikipedia.org)
$30,000
Rentabilidad de la inversión sobre los ahorros
mixed portfolio: 55% actual 60/40 securities returns (taxed) + 45% US long-run home-price rate on the rest
$16,693,068
Expenses
Honorarios de representación
agente 10% + abogado 5%
-$29,192,272
Taxes
Tasas efectivas entre EE. UU. y CA, año tras año
-$75,604,391
Gastos personales
measured household savings rates by income, times a 88% entertainment-household factor
-$49,570,083
Patrimonio neto estimado$56,941,466

Película por película

Daisy Ridley film-by-film pay
FilmYearRoleBudgetTaquillasPago contado
Ebenezer: A Christmas Carol
no disclosed fee: modeled on the $25.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid); budget unreported, small-film terms
2026Lead$2,998,449
TBA
no disclosed fee: modeled on the $25.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid); budget unreported, small-film terms
2026Lead$2,998,449
We Were There
no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $25.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio); budget unreported, small-film terms
2026Supporting$2,998,449
Butterfly Journey
no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $25.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio); budget unreported, small-film terms
2025Supporting$2,996,981
Cleaner
no disclosed fee: modeled on the $21.7M shrunk median for 2020s/mid (n=1), capped at $3.8M
2025Lead$25,000,000$1,300,000$3,745,922
Grande Envie
no disclosed fee: modeled on the $25.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid); budget unreported, small-film terms
2025Lead$2,996,981
We Bury the Dead
no disclosed fee: modeled on the $25.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid), capped at $0.6M
2025Lead$4,000,000$4,000,000$600,000
Magpie
no disclosed fee: modeled on the $25.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid); budget unreported, small-film terms
2024Lead$2,994,128
Young Woman and the Sea
no disclosed fee: modeled on the $21.7M shrunk median for 2020s/mid (n=1), capped at $6.0M
2024Lead$40,000,000$1,900,000$5,986,504
Sometimes I Think About Dying
no disclosed fee: modeled on the $25.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid); budget unreported, small-film terms
2023Lead$245,127$2,988,589
The Inventor
no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $25.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio), capped at 15% of budget
2023Supporting$10,000,000$4,000,000$1,495,796
The Marsh King's Daughter
no disclosed fee: modeled on the $25.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid), capped at $0.5M
2023Lead$3,300,000$3,300,000$495,000
The Bubble
no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $25.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio); budget unreported, small-film terms
2022Supporting$2,977,875
Chaos Walking
no disclosed fee: modeled on the $16.4M shrunk median for 2020s/tentpole (n=5)
2021Lead$125,000,000$27,000,000$16,140,471
Twelve Minutes
no disclosed fee: modeled on the $25.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid); budget unreported, small-film terms
2021Lead$2,957,283
Asteroid Hunters
no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $25.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio); budget unreported, small-film terms
2020Supporting$2,918,193
Baba Yaga
no disclosed fee: modeled on the $25.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid); budget unreported, small-film terms
2020Lead$2,918,193
Disneyland
no disclosed fee: modeled on the $25.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid); budget unreported, small-film terms
2020Lead$2,918,193
The Dawn of Art
no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $25.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio); budget unreported, small-film terms
2020Supporting$2,918,193
Star Wars: Rise of the Resistance
no disclosed fee: modeled on the $5.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid); budget unreported, small-film terms
2019Lead$2,813,214
Star Wars: The Rise of Skywalker
no disclosed fee: modeled on the $15.8M shrunk median for 2010s/blockbuster (n=11)
2019Lead$275,000,000$1,074,144,248$14,770,330
Murder on the Orient Express
no disclosed fee: modeled on the $5.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid), capped at $0.2M
2018Lead$1,400,000$27,634,716$199,868
Ophelia
no disclosed fee: modeled on the $5.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid), capped at $0.1M
2018Lead$338,940$338,940$50,841
Peter Rabbit
no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $20.0M shrunk median for 2010s/large (n=8) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio)
2018Supporting$50,000,000$351,300,000$2,173,514
Murder on the Orient Express
soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.79): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $20.0M shrunk median for 2010s/large (n=8), capped at $8.2M vs early terms
2017Lead$55,000,000$352,789,811$6,633,284
Star Wars Battlefront II
soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.79): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $5.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid); budget unreported, small-film terms vs early terms
2017Lead$2,400,250
Star Wars: The Last Jedi
soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.79): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $15.8M shrunk median for 2010s/blockbuster (n=11) vs early terms
2017Lead$200,000,000$1,334,000,000$12,561,875
Alianza de mujeres periodistas cinematográficas
soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.66): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $5.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid); budget unreported, small-film terms vs early terms
2016Lead$2,024,675
Best Breakthrough Performance
soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.66): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $5.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid); budget unreported, small-film terms vs early terms
2016Lead$2,024,675
Lego Star Wars: The Force Awakens
soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.66): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $5.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid); budget unreported, small-film terms vs early terms
2016Lead$2,024,675
Only Yesterday
soft-breakthrough supporting blend (w=0.66)
2016Supporting$438,859
The Eagle Huntress
soft-breakthrough supporting blend (w=0.66)
2016Supporting$4,400,000$4,400,000$438,859
Disney Infinity 3.0
soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.50): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $5.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid); budget unreported, small-film terms vs early terms
2015Lead$1,562,500
Scrawl
soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.50): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $5.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid); budget unreported, small-film terms vs early terms
2015Lead$1,562,500
Star Wars: The Force Awakens
soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.50): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $15.8M shrunk median for 2010s/blockbuster (n=11) vs early terms
2015Lead$245,000,000$2,068,223,624$8,081,731
Mr. Selfridge
soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.34): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $5.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid); budget unreported, small-film terms vs early terms
2014Lead$1,100,325
Silent Witness
soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.34): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $5.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid); budget unreported, small-film terms vs early terms
2014Lead$1,100,325
Star Wars Forces of Destiny
soft-breakthrough supporting blend (w=0.34)
2014Supporting$286,141
The Quiet Ones
soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.34): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $5.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid), capped at $0.0M vs early terms
2014Lead$200,000$17,800,000$30,000
Under
soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.34): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $5.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid); budget unreported, small-film terms vs early terms
2014Lead$1,100,325
100% BEEF
soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.21): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $5.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid); budget unreported, small-film terms vs early terms
2013Lead$724,750
Blue Season
soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.21): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $5.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid); budget unreported, small-film terms vs early terms
2013Lead$724,750
Casualty
soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.21): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $5.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid); budget unreported, small-film terms vs early terms
2013Lead$724,750
Crossed Wires
soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.21): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $5.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid); budget unreported, small-film terms vs early terms
2013Lead$724,750
Lifesaver
soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.21): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $5.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid); budget unreported, small-film terms vs early terms
2013Lead$724,750
Toast of London
soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.21): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $5.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid); budget unreported, small-film terms vs early terms
2013Lead$724,750
Wiley (rapper)
soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.21): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $5.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid); budget unreported, small-film terms vs early terms
2013Lead$724,750
Youngers
soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.21): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $5.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid); budget unreported, small-film terms vs early terms
2013Lead$724,750
Dominoes
no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $5.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid) (pre-stardom rate); budget unreported, small-film terms; soft-breakthrough weight 0.12
2012Lead$467,708
The Boy Friend
no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $5.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid) (pre-stardom rate); budget unreported, small-film terms; soft-breakthrough weight 0.03
2010Lead$224,030

Cómo funcionan las figuras modeladas. An undisclosed lead role after the breakthrough gets the median of disclosed lead salaries for its era and budget band, capped at 15% of the film’s budget. Supporting and pre-breakthrough roles get 2.5% of that median, the documented going rate for actors before stardom. Films with no reported budget are treated as small productions. Undocumented backend, endorsements, and producer or director credits enter as separate estimated lines in the calculation above, built from disclosed medians. Every median comes from the published tables on our página de metodología.

Patrimonio neto Over Time

$20M$40M20092013201720212026$56.9 Million2009: $3,1522010: $10,7222011: $17,7152012: $468,3092013: $1,568,3482014: $2,867,9172015: $6,183,1472016: $10,284,4722017: $16,117,3572018: $19,363,8312019: $25,823,5012020: $31,513,1662021: $38,007,2622022: $36,790,0932023: $42,002,2612024: $47,953,7222025: $54,153,4112026: $56,941,466

Saldo modelado al final de cada año, que coincide con la tabla año por año a continuación.

Año tras año

Daisy Ridley year by year model
YearIncomeHonorarios de representanteTasa impositivaSpentSavedBalance
2026$8,061,656$1,209,24845%$2,077,376$1,691,448$56,941,466
2025$12,900,433$1,935,06545%$3,324,261$2,706,691$54,153,411
2024$12,357,677$1,853,65145%$3,184,400$2,592,814$47,953,722
2023$9,146,346$1,371,95245%$2,356,885$1,919,031$42,002,261
2022$6,541,296$981,19445%$1,685,600$1,372,455$36,790,093
2021$18,305,430$2,745,81545%$4,717,053$3,840,736$38,007,262
2020$17,972,467$2,695,87045%$4,631,253$3,770,875$31,513,166
2019$20,966,698$3,145,00545%$5,402,824$4,399,107$25,823,501
2018$15,024,492$2,253,67445%$3,871,601$3,152,349$19,363,831
2017$24,977,685$3,746,65347%$6,202,349$5,050,098$16,117,357
2016$18,695,614$2,804,34247%$4,642,413$3,779,961$10,284,472
2015$16,052,481$2,407,87247%$3,986,081$3,245,561$6,183,147
2014$5,954,001$893,10047%$1,478,471$1,203,806$2,867,917
2013$5,227,732$784,16047%$1,298,128$1,056,966$1,568,348
2012$2,066,795$310,01943%$551,951$449,411$468,309
2011$140,313$21,04743%$61,401$6,581$17,715
2010$156,821$23,52343%$68,625$7,355$10,722
2009$67,209$10,08143%$29,411$3,152$3,152

Model Notes

  • PROXY DE RESIDENCIA: residencia no obtenida individualmente para este lote; El valor predeterminado de EE. UU.-CA se aplica hasta que se documente
  • salary comps: 2 disclosed lead fee(s) flagged as non-market outliers (scale / far-below-quote) and excluded from era medians
  • Crédito de la imagen: Wikimedia Commons via Wikipedia (Daisy Ridley)
Reproduce este número. Una estimación del patrimonio neto debería ser reproducible del mismo modo que lo es un hallazgo científico: las mismas aportaciones públicas y las mismas tarifas publicadas deberían dar siempre la misma respuesta. Los presupuestos cinematográficos y la taquilla son informes públicos. Cada salario, tasa de honorarios, tasa impositiva, tasa de ahorro y rendimiento de referencia divulgados se publica con citas en nuestro página de metodología. Undisclosed lead roles use the median of disclosed salaries for their era and budget band, capped at 15% of the film’s budget. Supporting and early-career roles use the documented pre-stardom fraction of that median. Undocumented backend, endorsements, and hyphenate credits enter as estimated lines from disclosed medians. Apply the rates year by year as shown above and you will land on $56.9 Million.

Metodología

We rebuild Daisy’s career as a yearly time series. Disclosed salaries and documented backend enter as reported, with citations. Undisclosed lead roles get the median of disclosed salaries for their era and budget band, capped at 15% of the film’s budget. Supporting roles and roles from before the breakthrough get 2.5% of that median, the going-rate ratio measured from disclosed pre-stardom deals. Films with no reported budget are treated as small productions, and every role is estimated unless a source documents it was unpaid. Representation fees come out at sourced rates, taxes follow the eras actually lived through, spending follows measured household savings behavior unless court documents say otherwise, and what remains compounds at real market returns. Undocumented backend enters as an expected value from disclosed deals, endorsements at the median disclosed ambassador fee, and producer or director credits at union-scale floors.

El modelo completo, cada tabla de tarifas y cómo nuestras estimaciones se han comparado con ofertas reales están en el sitio. página de metodología.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Daisy Ridley's net worth in 2026?

As of 2026, Daisy Ridley's net worth is an estimated $56.9 Million. The estimate is built film by film from disclosed salaries and documented backend, then year by year: income, minus representation fees and taxes, minus spending, compounded at real market returns.

How does Daisy Ridley make money?

Salarios cinematográficos y participación backend documentada.

How is Daisy Ridley's net worth calculated?

Disclosed paydays enter as reported, with citations. Undisclosed lead roles use the median of disclosed salaries for their era and budget band, capped at 15% of the film's budget, and supporting or early-career roles use the documented pre-stardom fraction of that median. We subtract sourced representation fees, taxes for the years Daisy actually worked, and spending from measured savings behavior, then compound at real market returns. Undocumented backend, endorsements, and producing credits enter as estimated lines from disclosed medians. Every rate and source is published.

How much does Daisy Ridley make per film?

Varía según el papel y la época, y la tabla película por película anterior enumera el pago contado para cada título. Los días de pago divulgados ingresan según lo informado. Los papeles no revelados se modelan a partir de lo que ganaron actores comparables en la misma época y rango de presupuesto, siendo los papeles principales después del gran avance los que ganan más y los papeles secundarios o iniciales una fracción documentada de eso.

¿Por qué el tipo impositivo es tan alto y los actores no lo evitan con una empresa de préstamo?

Tax comes out at the effective rate for where Daisy lived each year, which is the rate shown in the year-by-year table. In a high-tax state like California, combined federal and state income tax reaches close to half of a top earner's income, so those years run in the mid-40s percent. A loan-out company, the corporation many actors run their income through, does not lower the tax on the money they take home. Its real advantage is deducting business costs such as agent, manager, and attorney fees, and the model already subtracts those as a separate line before any tax is applied. High-earning performers also fall outside the pass-through business deduction that other company owners can claim, so it buys them no rate cut.

¿Por qué esta cifra es diferente a la de otros sitios de patrimonio neto?

Most sites publish a single number with no way to check it. This estimate is built in the open: every salary, rate, and assumption is on the page, and the página de metodología lists every source.

¿Qué tan precisa es esta estimación?

Ninguna estimación del patrimonio neto de un particular es exacta; éste es un modelo construido a partir de datos públicos. La diferencia es que puedes ver cómo se construyó y comprobar cada paso. El grado de confianza cerca de la parte superior del cálculo muestra qué parte de la cifra se basa en números revelados, y la página indica dónde se apoya un número en una suposición.

Is Daisy Ridley rich compared to the average person?

Yes. A net worth of $56.9 Million is far above the median American household, which sits near $193,000 according to Federal Reserve data.

What is Daisy Ridley's biggest source of wealth?

On this page it is film salaries, the largest line in the calculation at $107.4 Million. The full breakdown, with every other line and its source, is above.

How much does Daisy Ridley make from endorsements?

The model counts $16.0 Million in career endorsement income for Daisy: 1 named partnerships x the $4.0M annual fee from the median disclosed film deal x a 4-year term, spread across the deal years. It is an estimate, since the individual deal values are not all public, and it sits as its own line in the calculation above.

Explora otros actores

Acerca de NetWorth Explained

We originally created NWE because nobody in the public-figure net worth space showed their work. Magazines and sites threw out big numbers while hiding behind vague claims of “proprietary algorithms” o “insider knowledge.” That’s why we started the world’s only publication that transparently showed every assumption, every variable, and every calculation. We’re still the only ones who do it this way. Leer más sobre NetWorth Explained.