Jennifer Lawrence Patrimonio neto 2026
Actualizado August 3, 2026
As of 2026, Jennifer Lawrence has an estimated net worth of $150.7 Million, computed film by film and year by year from public records and published rates. Every input, rate, and source behind the number is on this page.
Calculation
- Salarios divulgados y backend documentado, cada uno con una cita.
- Roles no revelados modelados a partir de comparables revelados para su época, rango de presupuesto y etapa profesional.
- Backend, patrocinios y créditos de producción estimados a partir de medianas divulgadas
Fast Facts
| Birthdate | August 15, 1990 |
|---|---|
| Birthplace | Indian Hills |
| Breakthrough | Winter's Bone (2010) |
| Best Known | The Hunger Games (2012) |
Who Is Jennifer Lawrence?
Jennifer Lawrence was born August 15, 1990 in Indian Hills, best known for The Hunger Games (2012). The earnings behind Jennifer's net worth come from film salaries, backend participation, and endorsement deals.
The model tracks Jennifer's earning years from 2005 to 2026, with the biggest single year in 2014 at about $52.7 Million of gross income. After representation fees, taxes, and living costs, what stays invested compounds at market returns into an estimated $150.7 Million today.
Data
Cada línea a continuación se calcula a partir de datos públicos y las tablas de tarifas publicadas en nuestro página de metodología. Confianza: Grado C. Las cifras documentadas cubren sólo una pequeña parte de esta cifra, por lo que la mayor parte está modelada a partir de tasas publicadas y comparables (las calificaciones van desde A, en su mayoría documentada, hasta C, en su mayoría modelada).
The Calculation
| Line | Amount |
|---|---|
| Revenue | |
| Film pay with a disclosed figure (2 of 36 films) Salarios por película y backend de los informes citados. | $45,000,000 |
| Film pay, modeled lead roles (20 of 36 films) era and budget-band medians of disclosed lead salaries (winsorized, thin cells shrunk toward the era median), blended with this actor's disclosed quote history when available; soft breakthrough blend near the career break year | $269,806,286 |
| Film pay, modeled post-breakthrough supporting roles (3 of 36 films) 12.0% of lead cells: lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio | $8,259,563 |
| Film pay, modeled supporting and early roles (11 of 36 films) 2,5% de las medianas de la época: la tasa previa al estrellato | $14,131,066 |
| Puntos backend, estimados 12% of disclosed lead deals included points, at a median 2.6% of box office; expected value on 19 commercially viable undisclosed lead roles; cash spread over 3 years; 4 film(s) used band-specific box-office/budget multiples as a gross proxy | $18,245,328 |
| Respaldos, estimados (3 asociaciones de marca) 3 named partnerships x the $5.0M annual fee from the median disclosed film deal, scaled 1.25x to this actor's quote vs era median x a 4-year term, spread across the deal years | $60,000,000 |
| Residuos, estimados SAG residual rates on post-theatrical receipts assumed at half of box office, split by role share and spread over the ten years after each release; 12 film(s) used band-specific box-office proxies | $42,470,869 |
| TV: Monk Mascot; guest default per credited year; cable network family; priced from tv_episode_rates.csv (en.wikipedia.org) | $30,000 |
| TV: Cold Case credited role; guest default per credited year; broadcast network family; priced from tv_episode_rates.csv (en.wikipedia.org) | $30,000 |
| TV: Medium Young Allison / Claire Chase; stated episode count; broadcast network family; priced from tv_episode_rates.csv (en.wikipedia.org) | $30,000 |
| TV: The Bill Engvall Show credited role; series episode total for a full-run credit; cable network family; priced from tv_episode_rates.csv (en.wikipedia.org) | $6,000,000 |
| TV: Saturday Night Live Herself (host); guest default per credited year; variety format tier; priced from tv_episode_rates.csv (en.wikipedia.org) | $30,000 |
| TV: Jimmy Kimmel Live! Herself (host); guest default per credited year; talk format tier; priced from tv_episode_rates.csv (en.wikipedia.org) | $10,000 |
| Rentabilidad de la inversión sobre los ahorros mixed portfolio: 55% actual 60/40 securities returns (taxed) + 45% US long-run home-price rate on the rest | $55,525,365 |
| Expenses | |
| Honorarios de representación agente 10% + abogado 5% | -$68,959,097 |
| Taxes Tasas efectivas entre EE. UU. y Nueva York, año tras año | -$178,574,975 |
| Gastos personales measured household savings rates by income, times a 88% entertainment-household factor | -$116,990,771 |
| Patrimonio neto estimado | $150,727,833 |
Película por película
| Film | Year | Role | Budget | Taquillas | Pago contado |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| The Hunger Games: Sunrise on the Reaping no disclosed fee: modeled on the $23.8M shrunk median for 2020s/large (n=2); blended 75% with this actor's disclosed quote history ($25.0M personal, n=1); cap raised to similar-budget personal max within 50% of budget ($25.0M) | 2026 | Lead | $70,000,000 | – | $24,685,370 |
| What Happens at Night no disclosed fee: modeled on the $23.8M shrunk median for 2020s/large (n=2); blended 75% with this actor's disclosed quote history ($25.0M personal, n=1); cap raised to similar-budget personal max within 50% of budget ($25.0M) | 2026 | Lead | $70,000,000 | – | $24,685,370 |
| Die My Love no disclosed fee: modeled on the $25.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid); personal blend cut to 24% on a smaller-than-usual budget; blended 24% with this actor's disclosed quote history ($25.0M personal, n=1); cap raised to similar-budget personal max within 50% of budget ($6.1M), capped at $6.1M | 2025 | Lead | $12,200,000 | $12,200,000 | $6,099,057 |
| Zurawski v Texas no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $23.8M shrunk median for 2020s/large (n=2) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio) | 2024 | Supporting | $70,000,000 | – | $2,999,193 |
| Bread and Roses no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $23.8M shrunk median for 2020s/large (n=2) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio) | 2023 | Supporting | $70,000,000 | – | $2,998,429 |
| No Hard Feelings no disclosed fee: modeled on the $21.7M shrunk median for 2020s/mid (n=1); personal blend cut to 73% on a smaller-than-usual budget; blended 73% with this actor's disclosed quote history ($25.0M personal, n=2); cap raised to similar-budget personal max within 50% of budget ($22.5M), capped at $22.5M | 2023 | Lead | $45,000,000 | $87,300,000 | $22,485,662 |
| Causeway no disclosed fee: modeled on the $23.8M shrunk median for 2020s/large (n=2); blended 75% with this actor's disclosed quote history ($25.0M personal, n=2); cap raised to similar-budget personal max within 50% of budget ($25.0M) | 2022 | Lead | $70,000,000 | – | $24,656,876 |
| Don't Look Up disclosed: Variety: $25M streaming salary | 2021 | Lead | $75,000,000 | $1,172,913 | $25,000,000 |
| Dark Phoenix no disclosed fee: modeled on the $15.8M shrunk median for 2010s/blockbuster (n=11); blended 75% with this actor's disclosed quote history ($20.0M personal, n=1) | 2019 | Lead | $200,000,000 | $244,676,878 | $18,769,515 |
| Red Sparrow no disclosed fee: modeled on the $20.0M shrunk median for 2010s/large (n=8); blended 75% with this actor's disclosed quote history ($20.0M personal, n=1); cap raised to similar-budget personal max within 50% of budget ($20.0M) | 2018 | Lead | $69,000,000 | $151,572,634 | $19,649,269 |
| Mother! no disclosed fee: modeled on the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3); personal blend cut to 41% on a smaller-than-usual budget; blended 41% with this actor's disclosed quote history ($20.0M personal, n=1); cap raised to similar-budget personal max within 50% of budget ($15.0M) | 2017 | Lead | $30,000,000 | $44,500,000 | $14,185,573 |
| A Beautiful Planet no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio) | 2016 | Supporting | $40,000,000 | $25,700,000 | $2,261,941 |
| Passengers disclosed: reported $20M, widely covered at the time | 2016 | Lead | $110,000,000 | $303,144,152 | $20,000,000 |
| X-Men: Apocalypse no disclosed fee: modeled on the $20.0M shrunk median for 2010s/tentpole (n=12); blended 75% with this actor's disclosed quote history ($20.0M personal, n=1) | 2016 | Lead | $178,000,000 | $543,934,105 | $18,733,101 |
| Joy no disclosed fee: modeled on the $20.0M shrunk median for 2010s/large (n=8); blended 75% with this actor's disclosed quote history ($20.0M personal, n=1); cap raised to similar-budget personal max within 50% of budget ($20.0M) | 2015 | Lead | $60,000,000 | $101,100,000 | $17,675,543 |
| The Hunger Games: Mockingjay – Part 2 no disclosed fee: modeled on the $20.0M shrunk median for 2010s/tentpole (n=12); blended 75% with this actor's disclosed quote history ($20.0M personal, n=1) | 2015 | Lead | $160,000,000 | $661,456,563 | $17,675,543 |
| Serena soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.79): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3), capped at $4.1M vs early terms | 2014 | Lead | $27,500,000 | $5,000,000 | $3,321,857 |
| The Hunger Games: Mockingjay – Part 1 soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.79): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $20.0M shrunk median for 2010s/tentpole (n=12), capped at $18.8M vs early terms | 2014 | Lead | $125,000,000 | $755,356,711 | $14,942,894 |
| X-Men: Days of Future Past soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.79): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $15.8M shrunk median for 2010s/blockbuster (n=11) vs early terms | 2014 | Lead | $210,000,000 | $746,045,700 | $12,561,875 |
| American Hustle soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.66): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3), capped at $6.0M vs early terms | 2013 | Lead | $40,000,000 | $251,000,000 | $4,057,830 |
| The Devil You Know soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.66): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3), capped at $6.0M vs early terms | 2013 | Lead | $40,000,000 | – | $4,057,830 |
| The Hunger Games: Catching Fire soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.66): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $20.0M shrunk median for 2010s/tentpole (n=12), capped at $19.5M vs early terms | 2013 | Lead | $130,000,000 | $865,011,746 | $13,054,371 |
| House at the End of the Street soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.50): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $5.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid), capped at $1.3M vs early terms | 2012 | Lead | $8,450,000 | $44,300,000 | $696,250 |
| Silver Linings Playbook soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.50): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3), capped at $3.1M vs early terms | 2012 | Lead | $21,000,000 | $236,412,453 | $1,712,500 |
| The Hunger Games (film) soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.50): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $20.0M shrunk median for 2010s/large (n=8), capped at $11.7M vs early terms | 2012 | Lead | $78,000,000 | $695,220,619 | $6,100,000 |
| Like Crazy soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.34): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $5.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid), capped at $0.0M vs early terms | 2011 | Lead | $250,000 | $3,800,000 | $37,500 |
| The Beaver (film) soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.34): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3), capped at $3.1M vs early terms | 2011 | Lead | $21,000,000 | $7,300,000 | $1,250,325 |
| X-Men: First Class soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.34): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $20.0M shrunk median for 2010s/tentpole (n=12) vs early terms | 2011 | Lead | $160,000,000 | $353,624,124 | $7,115,251 |
| Parachute (band) soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.21): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3), capped at $6.0M vs early terms | 2010 | Lead | $40,000,000 | – | $1,469,284 |
| Winter's Bone soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.21): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $5.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid), capped at $0.3M vs early terms | 2010 | Lead | $2,000,000 | $16,100,000 | $161,506 |
| Garden Party no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $19.4M shrunk median for 2000s/mid (n=2) (pre-stardom rate); soft-breakthrough weight 0.06 | 2008 | Lead | $40,000,000 | – | $842,721 |
| The Burning Plain no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $19.4M shrunk median for 2000s/mid (n=2) (pre-stardom rate); soft-breakthrough weight 0.06 | 2008 | Lead | $20,000,000 | $5,500,000 | $647,813 |
| Cold Case no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $19.4M shrunk median for 2000s/mid (n=2) (pre-stardom rate); soft-breakthrough weight 0.03 | 2007 | Lead | $40,000,000 | – | $674,362 |
| Medium no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $19.4M shrunk median for 2000s/mid (n=2) (pre-stardom rate); soft-breakthrough weight 0.03 | 2007 | Lead | $40,000,000 | – | $674,362 |
| The Bill Engvall Show no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $19.4M shrunk median for 2000s/mid (n=2) (pre-stardom rate); soft-breakthrough weight 0.03 | 2007 | Lead | $40,000,000 | – | $674,362 |
| Monk no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $19.4M shrunk median for 2000s/mid (n=2) (pre-stardom rate); soft-breakthrough weight 0.02 | 2006 | Lead | $40,000,000 | – | $583,580 |
Cómo funcionan las figuras modeladas. An undisclosed lead role after the breakthrough gets the median of disclosed lead salaries for its era and budget band, capped at 15% of the film’s budget. Supporting and pre-breakthrough roles get 2.5% of that median, the documented going rate for actors before stardom. Films with no reported budget are treated as small productions. Undocumented backend, endorsements, and producer or director credits enter as separate estimated lines in the calculation above, built from disclosed medians. Every median comes from the published tables on our página de metodología.
Patrimonio neto Over Time
Saldo modelado al final de cada año, que coincide con la tabla año por año a continuación.
Año tras año
| Year | Income | Honorarios de representante | Tasa impositiva | Spent | Saved | Balance |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | $35,835,801 | $5,375,370 | 45% | $9,234,384 | $7,518,853 | $150,727,833 |
| 2025 | $20,587,655 | $3,088,148 | 45% | $5,305,150 | $4,319,578 | $140,366,557 |
| 2024 | $6,449,170 | $967,376 | 45% | $1,661,861 | $1,353,126 | $126,810,011 |
| 2023 | $21,889,763 | $3,283,464 | 45% | $5,640,685 | $4,592,779 | $116,167,708 |
| 2022 | $28,458,311 | $4,268,747 | 45% | $7,333,308 | $5,970,952 | $102,408,216 |
| 2021 | $36,264,082 | $5,439,612 | 45% | $9,344,746 | $7,608,712 | $103,488,450 |
| 2020 | $4,072,848 | $610,927 | 45% | $1,049,516 | $854,541 | $88,433,749 |
| 2019 | $17,111,605 | $2,566,741 | 45% | $4,409,421 | $3,590,254 | $81,521,811 |
| 2018 | $23,618,573 | $3,542,786 | 45% | $6,086,176 | $4,955,507 | $70,436,227 |
| 2017 | $20,789,825 | $3,118,474 | 47% | $5,162,438 | $4,203,378 | $65,100,532 |
| 2016 | $44,929,497 | $6,739,425 | 47% | $11,156,695 | $9,084,043 | $56,589,899 |
| 2015 | $52,224,055 | $7,833,608 | 47% | $12,968,047 | $10,558,889 | $45,158,773 |
| 2014 | $52,686,802 | $7,903,020 | 47% | $13,082,955 | $10,652,449 | $33,779,300 |
| 2013 | $42,362,484 | $6,354,373 | 47% | $10,519,266 | $8,565,033 | $21,795,988 |
| 2012 | $28,782,099 | $4,317,315 | 43% | $7,686,444 | $6,258,483 | $12,116,531 |
| 2011 | $8,696,661 | $1,304,499 | 43% | $2,322,499 | $1,891,033 | $5,491,336 |
| 2010 | $3,873,287 | $580,993 | 43% | $1,034,386 | $842,221 | $3,467,164 |
| 2009 | $2,700,048 | $405,007 | 43% | $721,065 | $587,108 | $2,457,106 |
| 2008 | $3,224,408 | $483,661 | 43% | $861,099 | $701,127 | $1,706,933 |
| 2007 | $3,949,829 | $592,474 | 43% | $1,054,827 | $858,865 | $1,105,646 |
| 2006 | $1,045,432 | $156,815 | 43% | $279,189 | $227,322 | $236,079 |
| 2005 | $175,074 | $26,261 | 43% | $76,612 | $8,211 | $8,211 |
Model Notes
- RESIDENCE PROXY: public New York base in recent years
- salary comps: 2 disclosed lead fee(s) flagged as non-market outliers (scale / far-below-quote) and excluded from era medians
- Crédito de la imagen: Wikimedia Commons via Wikipedia (Jennifer Lawrence)
Metodología
We rebuild Jennifer’s career as a yearly time series. Disclosed salaries and documented backend enter as reported, with citations. Undisclosed lead roles get the median of disclosed salaries for their era and budget band, capped at 15% of the film’s budget. Supporting roles and roles from before the breakthrough get 2.5% of that median, the going-rate ratio measured from disclosed pre-stardom deals. Films with no reported budget are treated as small productions, and every role is estimated unless a source documents it was unpaid. Representation fees come out at sourced rates, taxes follow the eras actually lived through, spending follows measured household savings behavior unless court documents say otherwise, and what remains compounds at real market returns. Undocumented backend enters as an expected value from disclosed deals, endorsements at the median disclosed ambassador fee, and producer or director credits at union-scale floors.
El modelo completo, cada tabla de tarifas y cómo nuestras estimaciones se han comparado con ofertas reales están en el sitio. página de metodología.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is Jennifer Lawrence's net worth in 2026?
As of 2026, Jennifer Lawrence's net worth is an estimated $150.7 Million. The estimate is built film by film from disclosed salaries and documented backend, then year by year: income, minus representation fees and taxes, minus spending, compounded at real market returns.
How does Jennifer Lawrence make money?
Salarios cinematográficos y participación backend documentada.
How is Jennifer Lawrence's net worth calculated?
Los días de pago divulgados ingresan según lo informado, con citaciones. Los papeles principales no revelados utilizan la mediana de los salarios revelados para su época y banda presupuestaria, con un límite del 15% del presupuesto de la película, y los papeles secundarios o de inicio de carrera utilizan la fracción documentada previa al estrellato de esa mediana. Restamos los honorarios de representación, los impuestos de los años en los que Jennifer realmente trabajó y el gasto del comportamiento de ahorro medido, y luego componemos los rendimientos reales del mercado. Backend indocumentados, respaldos y créditos de producción ingresan como líneas estimadas a partir de las medianas divulgadas. Se publican todas las tarifas y fuentes.
How much does Jennifer Lawrence make per film?
Varía según el papel y la época, y la tabla película por película anterior enumera el pago contado para cada título. Los días de pago divulgados ingresan según lo informado. Los papeles no revelados se modelan a partir de lo que ganaron actores comparables en la misma época y rango de presupuesto, siendo los papeles principales después del gran avance los que ganan más y los papeles secundarios o iniciales una fracción documentada de eso.
¿Por qué el tipo impositivo es tan alto y los actores no lo evitan con una empresa de préstamo?
El impuesto se aplica a la tasa efectiva del lugar donde vivió Jennifer cada año, que es la tasa que se muestra en la tabla año por año. En un estado con impuestos altos como California, el impuesto sobre la renta federal y estatal combinado alcanza cerca de la mitad de los ingresos de una persona con mayores ingresos, por lo que esos años rondan el 40 por ciento. Una empresa de préstamos, la corporación a través de la cual muchos actores administran sus ingresos, no reduce el impuesto sobre el dinero que se llevan a casa. Su verdadera ventaja es deducir los costos comerciales, como los honorarios de agentes, gerentes y abogados, y el modelo ya los resta como una línea separada antes de aplicar cualquier impuesto. Las empresas con altos ingresos también quedan fuera de la deducción empresarial de transferencia que otros propietarios de empresas pueden reclamar, por lo que no les permite obtener ningún recorte de tasas.
¿Por qué esta cifra es diferente a la de otros sitios de patrimonio neto?
Most sites publish a single number with no way to check it. This estimate is built in the open: every salary, rate, and assumption is on the page, and the página de metodología lists every source.
¿Qué tan precisa es esta estimación?
Ninguna estimación del patrimonio neto de un particular es exacta; éste es un modelo construido a partir de datos públicos. La diferencia es que puedes ver cómo se construyó y comprobar cada paso. El grado de confianza cerca de la parte superior del cálculo muestra qué parte de la cifra se basa en números revelados, y la página indica dónde se apoya un número en una suposición.
Is Jennifer Lawrence rich compared to the average person?
Yes. A net worth of $150.7 Million is far above the median American household, which sits near $193,000 according to Federal Reserve data.
What is Jennifer Lawrence's biggest source of wealth?
On this page it is film salaries, the largest line in the calculation at $269.8 Million. The full breakdown, with every other line and its source, is above.
How much does Jennifer Lawrence make from endorsements?
The model counts $60.0 Million in career endorsement income for Jennifer: 3 named partnerships x the $5.0M annual fee from the median disclosed film deal, scaled 1.25x to this actor's quote vs era median x a 4-year term, spread across the deal years. It is an estimate, since the individual deal values are not all public, and it sits as its own line in the calculation above.
Explora otros actores
Acerca de NetWorth Explained
We originally created NWE because nobody in the public-figure net worth space showed their work. Magazines and sites threw out big numbers while hiding behind vague claims of “proprietary algorithms” o “insider knowledge.” That’s why we started the world’s only publication that transparently showed every assumption, every variable, and every calculation. We’re still the only ones who do it this way. Leer más sobre NetWorth Explained.