$145.9 Million

Karen Gillan Patrimonio neto 2026

Actualizado August 3, 2026

As of 2026, Karen Gillan has an estimated net worth of $145.9 Million, computed film by film and year by year from public records and published rates. Every input, rate, and source behind the number is on this page.

Calculation

  • Salarios divulgados y backend documentado, cada uno con una cita.
  • Roles no revelados modelados a partir de comparables revelados para su época, rango de presupuesto y etapa profesional.
  • Backend, patrocinios y créditos de producción estimados a partir de medianas divulgadas
Karen Gillan

Fast Facts

BirthdateNovember 28, 1987
BirthplaceInverness
BreakthroughA Touch of Cloth (2014)
Best KnownAvengers: Endgame (2019)

Who Is Karen Gillan?

Karen Gillan was born November 28, 1987 in Inverness, best known for Avengers: Endgame (2019). The earnings behind Karen's net worth come from film salaries, backend participation, and endorsement deals.

The model tracks Karen's earning years from 2005 to 2026, with the biggest single year in 2019 at about $52.4 Million of gross income. After representation fees, taxes, and living costs, what stays invested compounds at market returns into an estimated $145.9 Million today.

Data

Cada línea a continuación se calcula a partir de datos públicos y las tablas de tarifas publicadas en nuestro página de metodología. Confianza: Grado C. Las cifras documentadas cubren sólo una pequeña parte de esta cifra, por lo que la mayor parte está modelada a partir de tasas publicadas y comparables (las calificaciones van desde A, en su mayoría documentada, hasta C, en su mayoría modelada).

The Calculation

Karen Gillan net worth line items
LineAmount
Revenue
Film pay, modeled lead roles (36 of 61 films)
era and budget-band medians of disclosed lead salaries (winsorized, thin cells shrunk toward the era median), blended with this actor's disclosed quote history when available; soft breakthrough blend near the career break year
$271,446,622
Film pay, modeled post-breakthrough supporting roles (7 of 61 films)
12.0% of lead cells: lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio
$13,850,359
Film pay, modeled supporting and early roles (18 of 61 films)
2,5% de las medianas de la época: la tasa previa al estrellato
$16,476,495
Puntos backend, estimados
12% of disclosed lead deals included points, at a median 2.6% of box office; expected value on 28 commercially viable undisclosed lead roles; cash spread over 3 years; 15 film(s) used band-specific box-office/budget multiples as a gross proxy
$34,970,341
Respaldos, estimados (1 asociación de marca)
1 named partnerships x the $4.0M annual fee from the median disclosed film deal x a 4-year term, spread across the deal years
$16,000,000
Residuos, estimados
SAG residual rates on post-theatrical receipts assumed at half of box office, split by role share and spread over the ten years after each release; 37 film(s) used band-specific box-office proxies
$77,425,825
TV: Rebus
Teri Cotter; guest default per credited year; network not identified, priced on the broadcast cell; priced from tv_episode_rates.csv (en.wikipedia.org)
$30,000
TV: Doctor Who
Soothsayer; guest default per credited year; network not identified, priced on the broadcast cell; priced from tv_episode_rates.csv (en.wikipedia.org)
$30,000
TV: Stacked
Ginny Turner; one engagement for a television film or special; broadcast network family; priced from tv_episode_rates.csv (en.wikipedia.org)
$75,000
TV: Harley Street
Holly; guest default per credited year; broadcast network family; priced from tv_episode_rates.csv (en.wikipedia.org)
$30,000
TV: Coming Up
Anna; guest default per credited year; broadcast network family; priced from tv_episode_rates.csv (en.wikipedia.org)
$30,000
TV: The Kevin Bishop Show
Various; series episode total for a full-run credit; broadcast network family; priced from tv_episode_rates.csv (en.wikipedia.org)
$1,800,000
TV: The Well
Coll; estimated ~12 episodes per credited year (no published count); broadcast network family; priced from tv_episode_rates.csv (en.wikipedia.org)
$1,800,000
TV: Doctor Who Prom (2010)
Herself; guest default per credited year; broadcast network family; priced from tv_episode_rates.csv (en.wikipedia.org)
$30,000
TV: We'll Take Manhattan
Jean Shrimpton; one engagement for a television film or special; network not identified, priced on the broadcast cell; priced from tv_episode_rates.csv (en.wikipedia.org)
$75,000
TV: In Love With...
Laura; guest default per credited year; network not identified, priced on the broadcast cell; priced from tv_episode_rates.csv (en.wikipedia.org)
$30,000
TV: NTSF:SD:SUV::
Daisy; series episode total for a full-run credit; network not identified, priced on the broadcast cell; priced from tv_episode_rates.csv (en.wikipedia.org)
$7,500,000
TV: A Touch of Cloth
Kerry Newblood; series episode total for a full-run credit; news format tier; priced from tv_episode_rates.csv (en.wikipedia.org)
$180,000
TV: Selfie
Eliza Dooley; series episode total for a full-run credit; network not identified, priced on the broadcast cell; priced from tv_episode_rates.csv (en.wikipedia.org)
$3,250,000
TV: Comedy Bang! Bang!
Herself; guest default per credited year; network not identified, priced on the broadcast cell; priced from tv_episode_rates.csv (en.wikipedia.org)
$30,000
TV: 7 Days in Hell
Lily Allsworth; one engagement for a television film or special; cable network family; priced from tv_episode_rates.csv (en.wikipedia.org)
$75,000
TV: Robot Chicken
Various; guest default per credited year; animation format tier; priced from tv_episode_rates.csv (en.wikipedia.org)
$24,000
TV: Emo Dad
Jessica; stated episode count; network not identified, priced on the broadcast cell; priced from tv_episode_rates.csv (en.wikipedia.org)
$375,000
TV: Neurotica
Chloe; guest default per credited year; network not identified, priced on the broadcast cell; priced from tv_episode_rates.csv (en.wikipedia.org)
$30,000
TV: Cake
Herself; stated episode count; network not identified, priced on the broadcast cell; priced from tv_episode_rates.csv (en.wikipedia.org)
$15,000
TV: Calls
Sara; guest default per credited year; network not identified, priced on the broadcast cell; priced from tv_episode_rates.csv (en.wikipedia.org)
$30,000
TV: What If...?
Nebula; stated episode count; animation format tier; priced from tv_episode_rates.csv (en.wikipedia.org)
$48,000
TV: The Guardians of the Galaxy Holiday Special
Nebula; one engagement for a television film or special; network not identified, priced on the broadcast cell; priced from tv_episode_rates.csv (en.wikipedia.org)
$75,000
TV: The Simpsons
Maisie MacWeldon-MacDougal; stated episode count; animation format tier; priced from tv_episode_rates.csv (en.wikipedia.org)
$24,000
TV: Marvel Studios: Assembled
Herself; guest default per credited year; network not identified, priced on the broadcast cell; priced from tv_episode_rates.csv (en.wikipedia.org)
$30,000
TV: Douglas Is Cancelled
Madeline Crow; series episode total for a full-run credit; network not identified, priced on the broadcast cell; priced from tv_episode_rates.csv (en.wikipedia.org)
$1,000,000
Rentabilidad de la inversión sobre los ahorros
mixed portfolio: 55% actual 60/40 securities returns (taxed) + 45% US long-run home-price rate on the rest
$48,556,332
Expenses
Honorarios de representación
agente 10% + abogado 5%
-$63,881,438
Taxes
Tasas efectivas del Reino Unido, año tras año
-$144,797,927
Gastos personales
measured household savings rates by income, times a 88% entertainment-household factor
-$119,828,403
Patrimonio neto estimado$145,924,819

Película por película

Karen Gillan film-by-film pay
FilmYearRoleBudgetTaquillasPago contado
Highlander
no disclosed fee: modeled on the $25.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid), capped at $2.9M
2026Lead$19,000,000$12,900,000$2,849,254
Jumanji: Open World
no disclosed fee: modeled on the $23.8M shrunk median for 2020s/large (n=2), capped at $10.5M
2026Lead$70,000,000$10,496,678
Douglas Is Cancelled
no disclosed fee: modeled on the $23.8M shrunk median for 2020s/large (n=2), capped at $10.5M
2024Lead$70,000,000$10,487,409
Sleeping Dogs
no disclosed fee: modeled on the $25.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid), capped at $0.3M
2024Lead$2,100,000$2,100,000$315,000
The Life of Chuck
no disclosed fee: modeled on the $23.8M shrunk median for 2020s/large (n=2), capped at $10.5M
2024Lead$70,000,000$21,300,000$10,487,409
Guardians of the Galaxy Vol. 3
no disclosed fee: modeled on the $18.0M shrunk median for 2020s/blockbuster (n=8)
2023Lead$250,000,000$845,555,777$17,956,605
Late Bloomers
no disclosed fee: modeled on the $23.8M shrunk median for 2020s/large (n=2), capped at $10.5M
2023Lead$70,000,000$10,475,506
The Simpsons
no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $23.8M shrunk median for 2020s/large (n=2) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio)
2023Supporting$75,000,000$536,400,000$2,844,421
Dual
no disclosed fee: modeled on the $25.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid), capped at $0.7M
2022Lead$4,500,000$425,909$674,760
Next Exit
no disclosed fee: modeled on the $23.8M shrunk median for 2020s/large (n=2), capped at $10.5M
2022Lead$70,000,000$4,742$10,452,403
The Bubble
no disclosed fee: modeled on the $23.8M shrunk median for 2020s/large (n=2), capped at $10.5M
2022Lead$70,000,000$10,452,403
Thor: amor y trueno
no disclosed fee: modeled on the $18.0M shrunk median for 2020s/blockbuster (n=8)
2022Lead$250,000,000$760,928,081$17,915,677
Calls
no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $23.8M shrunk median for 2020s/large (n=2) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio)
2021Supporting$70,000,000$2,828,981
Gunpowder Milkshake
no disclosed fee: modeled on the $21.7M shrunk median for 2020s/mid (n=1), capped at $4.5M
2021Lead$30,000,000$1,000,000$4,463,124
Cake
no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $23.8M shrunk median for 2020s/large (n=2) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio)
2020Supporting$70,000,000$2,809,419
The Call of the Wild
no disclosed fee: modeled on the $16.4M shrunk median for 2020s/tentpole (n=5)
2020Lead$150,000,000$107,604,626$16,140,471
Vengadores: final del juego
no disclosed fee: modeled on the $15.8M shrunk median for 2010s/blockbuster (n=11)
2019Lead$356,000,000$2,797,501,328$15,239,636
Jumanji: The Next Level
no disclosed fee: modeled on the $20.0M shrunk median for 2010s/tentpole (n=12), capped at $18.8M
2019Lead$125,000,000$800,059,707$18,121,375
Neurotica
no disclosed fee: modeled on the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3), capped at $6.0M
2019Lead$40,000,000$5,802,801
Spies in Disguise
no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $20.0M shrunk median for 2010s/tentpole (n=12) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio)
2019Supporting$100,000,000$171,600,000$2,334,554
Stuber
no disclosed fee: modeled on the $5.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid), capped at $2.7M
2019Lead$18,000,000$32,299,999$2,611,304
The Hoarding
no disclosed fee: modeled on the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3), capped at $6.0M
2019Lead$40,000,000$5,802,801
All Creatures Here Below
no disclosed fee: modeled on the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3), capped at $6.0M
2018Lead$40,000,000$5,628,052
Vengadores: Guerra Infinita
no disclosed fee: modeled on the $15.8M shrunk median for 2010s/blockbuster (n=11)
2018Lead$400,000,000$2,048,359,754$14,770,330
The Party's Just Beginning
no disclosed fee: modeled on the $5.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid), capped at $0.0M
2018Lead$4,371$4,371$656
Alex & the List
no disclosed fee: modeled on the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3), capped at $6.0M
2017Lead$40,000,000$5,317,563
Guardianes de la Galaxia Vol. 2
no disclosed fee: modeled on the $15.8M shrunk median for 2010s/blockbuster (n=11)
2017Lead$200,000,000$863,756,051$13,936,486
Jumanji: Welcome to the Jungle
no disclosed fee: modeled on the $20.0M shrunk median for 2010s/large (n=8), capped at $13.5M
2017Lead$90,000,000$962,102,237$11,950,362
El Círculo
no disclosed fee: modeled on the $5.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid), capped at $2.7M
2017Lead$18,000,000$33,900,000$2,393,052
Emo Dad
soft-breakthrough supporting blend (w=0.79)
2016Supporting$40,000,000$1,102,004
In a Valley of Violence
soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.79): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3), capped at $6.0M vs early terms
2016Lead$40,000,000$61,797$4,805,716
7 Days in Hell
soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.66): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3), capped at $6.0M vs early terms
2015Lead$40,000,000$4,057,830
Comedia ¡Explosión! ¡Estallido!
soft-breakthrough supporting blend (w=0.66)
2015Supporting$40,000,000$965,490
Coward
soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.66): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3), capped at $6.0M vs early terms
2015Lead$40,000,000$4,057,830
Fun Size Horror: Volume Two
soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.66): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3), capped at $6.0M vs early terms
2015Lead$40,000,000$4,057,830
Robot Chicken
soft-breakthrough supporting blend (w=0.66)
2015Supporting$40,000,000$965,490
The Big Short
soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.66): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3), capped at $4.2M vs early terms
2015Lead$28,000,000$133,346,506$2,868,469
Warning Labels
soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.66): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3), capped at $6.0M vs early terms
2015Lead$40,000,000$4,057,830
A Touch of Cloth
soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.50): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3), capped at $6.0M vs early terms
2014Lead$40,000,000$3,137,500
Bound for Greatness
soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.50): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3), capped at $6.0M vs early terms
2014Lead$40,000,000$3,137,500
Guardians of the Galaxy
soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.50): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $20.0M shrunk median for 2010s/tentpole (n=12) vs early terms
2014Lead$170,000,000$772,776,600$10,250,000
Happy Idiot
soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.50): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3), capped at $6.0M vs early terms
2014Lead$40,000,000$3,137,500
Selfie
soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.50): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3), capped at $6.0M vs early terms
2014Lead$40,000,000$355,315$3,137,500
American Airlines Theatre
soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.34): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3), capped at $6.0M vs early terms
2013Lead$40,000,000$2,217,170
NTSF:SD:SUV::
soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.34): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3), capped at $6.0M vs early terms
2013Lead$40,000,000$2,217,170
Not Another Happy Ending
soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.34): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3), capped at $6.0M vs early terms
2013Lead$40,000,000$2,217,170
Oculus
soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.34): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $5.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid), capped at $0.8M vs early terms
2013Lead$5,000,000$44,400,000$337,027
In Love With...
soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.21): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3), capped at $6.0M vs early terms
2012Lead$40,000,000$1,469,284
Inadmissible Evidence
no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3) (pre-stardom rate); soft-breakthrough weight 0.12
2011Lead$40,000,000$957,437
Doctor Who Prom (2010)
no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3) (pre-stardom rate)
2010Supporting$40,000,000$342,893
Doctor Who: Evacuation Earth
no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3) (pre-stardom rate); soft-breakthrough weight 0.06
2010Lead$40,000,000$646,948
Doctor Who: Return to Earth
no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3) (pre-stardom rate); soft-breakthrough weight 0.06
2010Lead$40,000,000$646,948
Outcast
no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3) (pre-stardom rate); soft-breakthrough weight 0.06
2010Lead$40,000,000$646,948
Doctor Who
no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $19.4M shrunk median for 2000s/mid (n=2) (pre-stardom rate); soft-breakthrough weight 0.03
2009Lead$40,000,000$674,362
The Well
no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $19.4M shrunk median for 2000s/mid (n=2) (pre-stardom rate); soft-breakthrough weight 0.03
2009Lead$40,000,000$674,362
Coming Up
no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $19.4M shrunk median for 2000s/mid (n=2) (pre-stardom rate); soft-breakthrough weight 0.02
2008Lead$40,000,000$583,580
Doctor Who
no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $19.4M shrunk median for 2000s/mid (n=2) (pre-stardom rate); soft-breakthrough weight 0.02
2008Lead$40,000,000$583,580
Harley Street
no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $19.4M shrunk median for 2000s/mid (n=2) (pre-stardom rate); soft-breakthrough weight 0.02
2008Lead$40,000,000$583,580
Stacked
no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $19.4M shrunk median for 2000s/mid (n=2) (pre-stardom rate); soft-breakthrough weight 0.02
2008Lead$40,000,000$583,580
The Kevin Bishop Show
no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $19.4M shrunk median for 2000s/mid (n=2) (pre-stardom rate); soft-breakthrough weight 0.02
2008Lead$40,000,000$583,580
Rebus
no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $19.4M shrunk median for 2000s/mid (n=2) (pre-stardom rate); soft-breakthrough weight 0.00
2006Lead$40,000,000$510,876

Cómo funcionan las figuras modeladas. An undisclosed lead role after the breakthrough gets the median of disclosed lead salaries for its era and budget band, capped at 15% of the film’s budget. Supporting and pre-breakthrough roles get 2.5% of that median, the documented going rate for actors before stardom. Films with no reported budget are treated as small productions. Undocumented backend, endorsements, and producer or director credits enter as separate estimated lines in the calculation above, built from disclosed medians. Every median comes from the published tables on our página de metodología.

Patrimonio neto Over Time

$50M$100M20052010201520202026$145.9 Million2005: $7,5662006: $72,3652007: $227,5352008: $1,020,3782009: $2,172,9392010: $2,837,2782011: $3,308,0212012: $4,386,6192013: $9,344,8312014: $17,135,8532015: $22,898,4312016: $29,086,5492017: $40,033,9792018: $48,519,3032019: $66,023,1542020: $77,500,6822021: $90,560,1042022: $94,431,7722023: $111,826,3772024: $127,030,2052025: $139,496,1572026: $145,924,819

Saldo modelado al final de cada año, que coincide con la tabla año por año a continuación.

Año tras año

Karen Gillan year by year model
YearIncomeHonorarios de representanteTasa impositivaSpentSavedBalance
2026$15,745,101$2,361,76540%$4,426,137$3,603,865$145,924,819
2025$11,535,416$1,730,31240%$3,242,744$2,640,318$139,496,157
2024$24,856,867$3,728,53040%$6,987,564$5,689,439$127,030,205
2023$36,617,308$5,492,59640%$10,293,565$8,381,262$111,826,377
2022$43,872,902$6,580,93540%$12,333,199$10,041,981$94,431,772
2021$26,690,677$4,003,60140%$7,503,069$6,109,176$90,560,104
2020$27,375,161$4,106,27440%$7,695,486$6,265,846$77,500,682
2019$52,350,632$7,852,59540%$14,716,391$11,982,431$66,023,154
2018$36,050,495$5,407,57440%$10,134,227$8,251,526$48,519,303
2017$37,547,954$5,632,19340%$10,555,180$8,594,276$40,033,979
2016$21,563,949$3,234,59240%$6,061,885$4,935,729$29,086,549
2015$23,331,793$3,499,76940%$6,558,847$5,340,368$22,898,431
2014$31,402,862$4,710,42940%$8,827,721$7,187,738$17,135,853
2013$19,781,652$2,967,24840%$5,560,860$4,527,783$9,344,831
2012$3,738,227$560,73440%$1,050,860$855,635$4,386,619
2011$1,577,649$236,64740%$443,496$361,105$3,308,021
2010$2,247,918$337,18840%$631,917$514,521$2,837,278
2009$4,578,280$686,74240%$1,287,010$1,047,913$2,172,939
2008$3,553,656$533,04840%$998,975$813,389$1,020,378
2007$916,879$137,53240%$315,355$152,253$227,535
2006$387,613$58,14240%$133,317$64,366$72,365
2005$153,263$22,98940%$70,598$7,566$7,566

Model Notes

  • PROXY DE RESIDENCIA: residencia no obtenida individualmente para este lote; El valor predeterminado de EE. UU.-CA se aplica hasta que se documente
  • salary comps: 2 disclosed lead fee(s) flagged as non-market outliers (scale / far-below-quote) and excluded from era medians
  • Crédito de la imagen: Wikimedia Commons via Wikipedia (Karen Gillan)
Reproduce este número. Una estimación del patrimonio neto debería ser reproducible del mismo modo que lo es un hallazgo científico: las mismas aportaciones públicas y las mismas tarifas publicadas deberían dar siempre la misma respuesta. Los presupuestos cinematográficos y la taquilla son informes públicos. Cada salario, tasa de honorarios, tasa impositiva, tasa de ahorro y rendimiento de referencia divulgados se publica con citas en nuestro página de metodología. Undisclosed lead roles use the median of disclosed salaries for their era and budget band, capped at 15% of the film’s budget. Supporting and early-career roles use the documented pre-stardom fraction of that median. Undocumented backend, endorsements, and hyphenate credits enter as estimated lines from disclosed medians. Apply the rates year by year as shown above and you will land on $145.9 Million.

Metodología

We rebuild Karen’s career as a yearly time series. Disclosed salaries and documented backend enter as reported, with citations. Undisclosed lead roles get the median of disclosed salaries for their era and budget band, capped at 15% of the film’s budget. Supporting roles and roles from before the breakthrough get 2.5% of that median, the going-rate ratio measured from disclosed pre-stardom deals. Films with no reported budget are treated as small productions, and every role is estimated unless a source documents it was unpaid. Representation fees come out at sourced rates, taxes follow the eras actually lived through, spending follows measured household savings behavior unless court documents say otherwise, and what remains compounds at real market returns. Undocumented backend enters as an expected value from disclosed deals, endorsements at the median disclosed ambassador fee, and producer or director credits at union-scale floors.

El modelo completo, cada tabla de tarifas y cómo nuestras estimaciones se han comparado con ofertas reales están en el sitio. página de metodología.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Karen Gillan's net worth in 2026?

As of 2026, Karen Gillan's net worth is an estimated $145.9 Million. The estimate is built film by film from disclosed salaries and documented backend, then year by year: income, minus representation fees and taxes, minus spending, compounded at real market returns.

How does Karen Gillan make money?

Salarios cinematográficos y participación backend documentada.

How is Karen Gillan's net worth calculated?

Disclosed paydays enter as reported, with citations. Undisclosed lead roles use the median of disclosed salaries for their era and budget band, capped at 15% of the film's budget, and supporting or early-career roles use the documented pre-stardom fraction of that median. We subtract sourced representation fees, taxes for the years Karen actually worked, and spending from measured savings behavior, then compound at real market returns. Undocumented backend, endorsements, and producing credits enter as estimated lines from disclosed medians. Every rate and source is published.

How much does Karen Gillan make per film?

Varía según el papel y la época, y la tabla película por película anterior enumera el pago contado para cada título. Los días de pago divulgados ingresan según lo informado. Los papeles no revelados se modelan a partir de lo que ganaron actores comparables en la misma época y rango de presupuesto, siendo los papeles principales después del gran avance los que ganan más y los papeles secundarios o iniciales una fracción documentada de eso.

¿Por qué el tipo impositivo es tan alto y los actores no lo evitan con una empresa de préstamo?

Tax comes out at the effective rate for where Karen lived each year, which is the rate shown in the year-by-year table. In a high-tax state like California, combined federal and state income tax reaches close to half of a top earner's income, so those years run in the mid-40s percent. A loan-out company, the corporation many actors run their income through, does not lower the tax on the money they take home. Its real advantage is deducting business costs such as agent, manager, and attorney fees, and the model already subtracts those as a separate line before any tax is applied. High-earning performers also fall outside the pass-through business deduction that other company owners can claim, so it buys them no rate cut.

¿Por qué esta cifra es diferente a la de otros sitios de patrimonio neto?

Most sites publish a single number with no way to check it. This estimate is built in the open: every salary, rate, and assumption is on the page, and the página de metodología lists every source.

¿Qué tan precisa es esta estimación?

Ninguna estimación del patrimonio neto de un particular es exacta; éste es un modelo construido a partir de datos públicos. La diferencia es que puedes ver cómo se construyó y comprobar cada paso. El grado de confianza cerca de la parte superior del cálculo muestra qué parte de la cifra se basa en números revelados, y la página indica dónde se apoya un número en una suposición.

Is Karen Gillan rich compared to the average person?

Yes. A net worth of $145.9 Million is far above the median American household, which sits near $193,000 according to Federal Reserve data.

What is Karen Gillan's biggest source of wealth?

On this page it is film salaries, the largest line in the calculation at $271.4 Million. The full breakdown, with every other line and its source, is above.

How much does Karen Gillan make from endorsements?

The model counts $16.0 Million in career endorsement income for Karen: 1 named partnerships x the $4.0M annual fee from the median disclosed film deal x a 4-year term, spread across the deal years. It is an estimate, since the individual deal values are not all public, and it sits as its own line in the calculation above.

Explora otros actores

Acerca de NetWorth Explained

We originally created NWE because nobody in the public-figure net worth space showed their work. Magazines and sites threw out big numbers while hiding behind vague claims of “proprietary algorithms” o “insider knowledge.” That’s why we started the world’s only publication that transparently showed every assumption, every variable, and every calculation. We’re still the only ones who do it this way. Leer más sobre NetWorth Explained.