$40.8 Million

Maya Hawke Patrimonio neto 2026

Actualizado August 3, 2026

As of 2026, Maya Hawke has an estimated net worth of $40.8 Million, computed film by film and year by year from public records and published rates. Every input, rate, and source behind the number is on this page.

Calculation

  • Salarios divulgados y backend documentado, cada uno con una cita.
  • Roles no revelados modelados a partir de comparables revelados para su época, rango de presupuesto y etapa profesional.
  • Backend, patrocinios y créditos de producción estimados a partir de medianas divulgadas
Maya Hawke

Fast Facts

Birthdaten / A
Birthplacen / A
Breakthroughcareer breakthrough modeled at 2019
Best KnownCosas más extrañas (2016)

Who Is Maya Hawke?

Maya Hawke is best known for Stranger Things (2016). The earnings behind Maya's net worth come from film salaries, backend participation, and endorsement deals.

The model tracks Maya's earning years from 2016 to 2026, with the biggest single year in 2022 at about $23.6 Million of gross income. After representation fees, taxes, and living costs, what stays invested compounds at market returns into an estimated $40.8 Million today.

Data

Cada línea a continuación se calcula a partir de datos públicos y las tablas de tarifas publicadas en nuestro página de metodología. Confianza: Grado C. Las cifras documentadas cubren sólo una pequeña parte de esta cifra, por lo que la mayor parte está modelada a partir de tasas publicadas y comparables (las calificaciones van desde A, en su mayoría documentada, hasta C, en su mayoría modelada).

The Calculation

Maya Hawke net worth line items
LineAmount
Revenue
Film pay, modeled lead roles (27 of 40 films)
era and budget-band medians of disclosed lead salaries (winsorized, thin cells shrunk toward the era median), blended with this actor's disclosed quote history when available; soft breakthrough blend near the career break year
$79,071,843
Film pay, modeled post-breakthrough supporting roles (9 of 40 films)
12.0% of lead cells: lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio
$24,999,103
Film pay, modeled supporting and early roles (4 of 40 films)
2,5% de las medianas de la época: la tasa previa al estrellato
$3,956,075
Puntos backend, estimados
12% of disclosed lead deals included points, at a median 2.6% of box office; expected value on 7 commercially viable undisclosed lead roles; cash spread over 3 years; 1 film(s) used band-specific box-office/budget multiples as a gross proxy
$1,350,682
Respaldos, estimados (1 asociación de marca)
1 named partnerships x the $4.0M annual fee from the median disclosed film deal x a 4-year term, spread across the deal years
$16,000,000
Residuos, estimados
SAG residual rates on post-theatrical receipts assumed at half of box office, split by role share and spread over the ten years after each release; 1 film(s) used band-specific box-office proxies
$5,125,431
TV: Little Women
Jo March; estimated ~12 episodes per credited year (no published count); network not identified, priced on the broadcast cell; priced from tv_episode_rates.csv (en.wikipedia.org)
$3,000,000
TV: Orchard House: Home of Little Women
Herself; guest default per credited year; network not identified, priced on the broadcast cell; priced from tv_episode_rates.csv (en.wikipedia.org)
$30,000
TV: Stranger Things
Robin Buckley; series episode total for a full-run credit; streaming network family; priced from tv_episode_rates.csv (en.wikipedia.org)
$29,400,000
TV: The Good Lord Bird
Annie Brown; one engagement for a television film or special; cable network family; priced from tv_episode_rates.csv (en.wikipedia.org)
$75,000
TV: The Last Movie Stars
Herself; guest default per credited year; news format tier; priced from tv_episode_rates.csv (en.wikipedia.org)
$10,000
TV: Moon Girl and Devil Dinosaur
Abyss; stated episode count; animation format tier; priced from tv_episode_rates.csv (en.wikipedia.org)
$36,000
TV: Nightmares of Nature
Self - Narrator; guest default per credited year; streaming network family; priced from tv_episode_rates.csv (en.wikipedia.org)
$30,000
TV: The American Revolution
Betsy Ambler (voice); guest default per credited year; broadcast network family; priced from tv_episode_rates.csv (en.wikipedia.org)
$30,000
Rentabilidad de la inversión sobre los ahorros
mixed portfolio: 55% actual 60/40 securities returns (taxed) + 45% US long-run home-price rate on the rest
$7,111,265
Expenses
Honorarios de representación
agente 10% + abogado 5%
-$24,162,352
Taxes
Tasas efectivas entre EE. UU. y CA, año tras año
-$61,702,658
Gastos personales
measured household savings rates by income, times a 88% entertainment-household factor
-$41,506,977
Patrimonio neto estimado$40,821,624

Película por película

Maya Hawke film-by-film pay
FilmYearRoleBudgetTaquillasPago contado
One Night Only
no disclosed fee: modeled on the $25.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid); budget unreported, small-film terms
2026Lead$2,977,875
The Chronicles of Astrimos
no disclosed fee: modeled on the $25.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid); budget unreported, small-film terms
2026Lead$2,977,875
The Hunger Games: Sunrise on the Reaping
no disclosed fee: modeled on the $25.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid); budget unreported, small-film terms
2026Lead$2,977,875
The Non-Actor
no disclosed fee: modeled on the $25.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid); budget unreported, small-film terms
2026Lead$2,977,875
The Summer Oath
no disclosed fee: modeled on the $25.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid); budget unreported, small-film terms
2026Lead$2,977,875
Wishful Thinking
no disclosed fee: modeled on the $25.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid); budget unreported, small-film terms
2026Lead$2,977,875
Alianza de mujeres periodistas cinematográficas
no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $25.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio); budget unreported, small-film terms
2025Supporting$2,957,283
Eurydice
no disclosed fee: modeled on the $25.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid); budget unreported, small-film terms
2025Lead$2,957,283
Nightmares of Nature
no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $25.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio); budget unreported, small-film terms
2025Supporting$2,957,283
The American Revolution
no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $25.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio); budget unreported, small-film terms
2025Supporting$2,957,283
The God of the Woods
no disclosed fee: modeled on the $25.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid); budget unreported, small-film terms
2025Lead$2,957,283
Videoheaven
no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $25.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio); budget unreported, small-film terms
2025Supporting$2,957,283
Chaos Angel
no disclosed fee: modeled on the $25.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid); budget unreported, small-film terms
2024Lead$2,918,193
Disney Speedstorm
no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $25.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio); budget unreported, small-film terms
2024Supporting$2,918,193
Inside Out 2
no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $18.0M shrunk median for 2020s/blockbuster (n=8) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio)
2024Supporting$200,000,000$835,300,000$2,101,099
Asteroid City
no disclosed fee: modeled on the $21.7M shrunk median for 2020s/mid (n=1), capped at $3.8M
2023Lead$25,000,000$53,857,743$3,541,557
Maestro
no disclosed fee: modeled on the $23.8M shrunk median for 2020s/large (n=2), capped at $12.0M
2023Lead$80,000,000$523,000$11,258,945
Sarah Weddington
no disclosed fee: modeled on the $25.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid); budget unreported, small-film terms
2023Lead$2,845,698
The Kill Room
no disclosed fee: modeled on the $25.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid), capped at $0.1M
2023Lead$724,285$724,285$108,643
Wildcat
no disclosed fee: modeled on the $25.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid); budget unreported, small-film terms
2023Lead$565,170$2,845,698
Do Revenge
no disclosed fee: modeled on the $25.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid), capped at $1.5M
2022Lead$10,000,000$1,395,697
Hollywood Creative Alliance
no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $25.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio); budget unreported, small-film terms
2022Supporting$2,716,893
Moon Girl and Devil Dinosaur
no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $25.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio); budget unreported, small-film terms
2022Supporting$2,716,893
Moss
no disclosed fee: modeled on the $25.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid); budget unreported, small-film terms
2022Lead$2,716,893
The Last Movie Stars
no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $25.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio); budget unreported, small-film terms
2022Supporting$2,716,893
Fear Street Part One: 1994
soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.79): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $25.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid); budget unreported, small-film terms vs early terms
2021Lead$2,504,555
Helen Gurley Brown
soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.79): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $25.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid); budget unreported, small-film terms vs early terms
2021Lead$2,504,555
Italian Studies
soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.79): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $25.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid); budget unreported, small-film terms vs early terms
2021Lead$5,895$2,504,555
Robin Buckley
soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.79): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $25.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid); budget unreported, small-film terms vs early terms
2021Lead$2,504,555
Blush
soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.66): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $25.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid); budget unreported, small-film terms vs early terms
2020Lead$2,194,296
Mainstream
soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.66): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $25.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid), capped at $0.8M vs early terms
2020Lead$5,000,000$40,209$707,595
Samia (musician)
soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.66): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $25.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid); budget unreported, small-film terms vs early terms
2020Lead$2,194,296
The Good Lord Bird
soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.66): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $25.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid); budget unreported, small-film terms vs early terms
2020Lead$2,194,296
Human Capital
soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.50): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $5.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid); budget unreported, small-film terms vs early terms
2019Lead$6,597$1,562,500
Érase una vez en Hollywood
soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.50): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $20.0M shrunk median for 2010s/large (n=8), capped at $13.9M vs early terms
2019Lead$93,000,000$374,343,626$7,225,000
Rubblebucket
soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.50): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $5.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid); budget unreported, small-film terms vs early terms
2019Lead$1,562,500
Ladyworld
soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.34): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $5.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid); budget unreported, small-film terms vs early terms
2018Lead$1,100,325
Orchard House: Home of Little Women
soft-breakthrough supporting blend (w=0.34)
2018Supporting$286,141
Stranger Things
soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.34): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $5.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid); budget unreported, small-film terms vs early terms
2018Lead$1,100,325
Little Women
soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.21): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3), capped at $6.0M vs early terms
2017Lead$40,000,000$218,843,645$1,469,284

Cómo funcionan las figuras modeladas. An undisclosed lead role after the breakthrough gets the median of disclosed lead salaries for its era and budget band, capped at 15% of the film’s budget. Supporting and pre-breakthrough roles get 2.5% of that median, the documented going rate for actors before stardom. Films with no reported budget are treated as small productions. Undocumented backend, endorsements, and producer or director credits enter as separate estimated lines in the calculation above, built from disclosed medians. Every median comes from the published tables on our página de metodología.

Patrimonio neto Over Time

$20M$40M201620182020202220242026$40.8 Million2016: $41,9392017: $1,010,4682018: $2,066,6452019: $5,715,8362020: $9,795,1652021: $14,800,7282022: $18,751,9772023: $24,992,0252024: $30,316,3652025: $37,333,9152026: $40,821,624

Saldo modelado al final de cada año, que coincide con la tabla año por año a continuación.

Año tras año

Maya Hawke year by year model
YearIncomeHonorarios de representanteTasa impositivaSpentSavedBalance
2026$13,019,616$1,952,94245%$3,354,973$2,731,698$40,821,624
2025$22,921,611$3,438,24245%$5,906,578$4,809,275$37,333,915
2024$15,851,614$2,377,74245%$4,084,739$3,325,891$30,316,365
2023$21,740,829$3,261,12445%$5,602,307$4,561,530$24,992,025
2022$23,638,543$3,545,78145%$6,091,322$4,959,697$18,751,977
2021$19,926,336$2,988,95045%$5,134,738$4,180,824$14,800,728
2020$17,418,376$2,612,75645%$4,488,472$3,654,619$9,795,165
2019$16,344,353$2,451,65345%$4,211,711$3,429,274$5,715,836
2018$5,005,747$750,86245%$1,289,911$1,050,276$2,066,645
2017$4,774,536$716,18047%$1,185,592$965,337$1,010,468
2016$440,785$66,11847%$156,635$41,939$41,939

Model Notes

  • PROXY DE RESIDENCIA: residencia no obtenida individualmente para este lote; El valor predeterminado de EE. UU.-CA se aplica hasta que se documente
  • salary comps: 2 disclosed lead fee(s) flagged as non-market outliers (scale / far-below-quote) and excluded from era medians
  • Crédito de la imagen: Wikimedia Commons via Wikipedia (Maya Hawke)
Reproduce este número. Una estimación del patrimonio neto debería ser reproducible del mismo modo que lo es un hallazgo científico: las mismas aportaciones públicas y las mismas tarifas publicadas deberían dar siempre la misma respuesta. Los presupuestos cinematográficos y la taquilla son informes públicos. Cada salario, tasa de honorarios, tasa impositiva, tasa de ahorro y rendimiento de referencia divulgados se publica con citas en nuestro página de metodología. Undisclosed lead roles use the median of disclosed salaries for their era and budget band, capped at 15% of the film’s budget. Supporting and early-career roles use the documented pre-stardom fraction of that median. Undocumented backend, endorsements, and hyphenate credits enter as estimated lines from disclosed medians. Apply the rates year by year as shown above and you will land on $40.8 Million.

Metodología

We rebuild Maya’s career as a yearly time series. Disclosed salaries and documented backend enter as reported, with citations. Undisclosed lead roles get the median of disclosed salaries for their era and budget band, capped at 15% of the film’s budget. Supporting roles and roles from before the breakthrough get 2.5% of that median, the going-rate ratio measured from disclosed pre-stardom deals. Films with no reported budget are treated as small productions, and every role is estimated unless a source documents it was unpaid. Representation fees come out at sourced rates, taxes follow the eras actually lived through, spending follows measured household savings behavior unless court documents say otherwise, and what remains compounds at real market returns. Undocumented backend enters as an expected value from disclosed deals, endorsements at the median disclosed ambassador fee, and producer or director credits at union-scale floors.

El modelo completo, cada tabla de tarifas y cómo nuestras estimaciones se han comparado con ofertas reales están en el sitio. página de metodología.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Maya Hawke's net worth in 2026?

As of 2026, Maya Hawke's net worth is an estimated $40.8 Million. The estimate is built film by film from disclosed salaries and documented backend, then year by year: income, minus representation fees and taxes, minus spending, compounded at real market returns.

How does Maya Hawke make money?

Salarios cinematográficos y participación backend documentada.

How is Maya Hawke's net worth calculated?

Disclosed paydays enter as reported, with citations. Undisclosed lead roles use the median of disclosed salaries for their era and budget band, capped at 15% of the film's budget, and supporting or early-career roles use the documented pre-stardom fraction of that median. We subtract sourced representation fees, taxes for the years Maya actually worked, and spending from measured savings behavior, then compound at real market returns. Undocumented backend, endorsements, and producing credits enter as estimated lines from disclosed medians. Every rate and source is published.

How much does Maya Hawke make per film?

Varía según el papel y la época, y la tabla película por película anterior enumera el pago contado para cada título. Los días de pago divulgados ingresan según lo informado. Los papeles no revelados se modelan a partir de lo que ganaron actores comparables en la misma época y rango de presupuesto, siendo los papeles principales después del gran avance los que ganan más y los papeles secundarios o iniciales una fracción documentada de eso.

¿Por qué el tipo impositivo es tan alto y los actores no lo evitan con una empresa de préstamo?

Tax comes out at the effective rate for where Maya lived each year, which is the rate shown in the year-by-year table. In a high-tax state like California, combined federal and state income tax reaches close to half of a top earner's income, so those years run in the mid-40s percent. A loan-out company, the corporation many actors run their income through, does not lower the tax on the money they take home. Its real advantage is deducting business costs such as agent, manager, and attorney fees, and the model already subtracts those as a separate line before any tax is applied. High-earning performers also fall outside the pass-through business deduction that other company owners can claim, so it buys them no rate cut.

¿Por qué esta cifra es diferente a la de otros sitios de patrimonio neto?

Most sites publish a single number with no way to check it. This estimate is built in the open: every salary, rate, and assumption is on the page, and the página de metodología lists every source.

¿Qué tan precisa es esta estimación?

Ninguna estimación del patrimonio neto de un particular es exacta; éste es un modelo construido a partir de datos públicos. La diferencia es que puedes ver cómo se construyó y comprobar cada paso. El grado de confianza cerca de la parte superior del cálculo muestra qué parte de la cifra se basa en números revelados, y la página indica dónde se apoya un número en una suposición.

Is Maya Hawke rich compared to the average person?

Yes. A net worth of $40.8 Million is far above the median American household, which sits near $193,000 according to Federal Reserve data.

What is Maya Hawke's biggest source of wealth?

On this page it is film salaries, the largest line in the calculation at $79.1 Million. The full breakdown, with every other line and its source, is above.

How much does Maya Hawke make from endorsements?

The model counts $16.0 Million in career endorsement income for Maya: 1 named partnerships x the $4.0M annual fee from the median disclosed film deal x a 4-year term, spread across the deal years. It is an estimate, since the individual deal values are not all public, and it sits as its own line in the calculation above.

Explora otros actores

Acerca de NetWorth Explained

We originally created NWE because nobody in the public-figure net worth space showed their work. Magazines and sites threw out big numbers while hiding behind vague claims of “proprietary algorithms” o “insider knowledge.” That’s why we started the world’s only publication that transparently showed every assumption, every variable, and every calculation. We’re still the only ones who do it this way. Leer más sobre NetWorth Explained.