$91.6 Million

Tom Hiddleston Patrimonio neto 2026

Actualizado August 3, 2026

As of 2026, Tom Hiddleston has an estimated net worth of $91.6 Million, computed film by film and year by year from public records and published rates. Every input, rate, and source behind the number is on this page.

Calculation

  • Salarios divulgados y backend documentado, cada uno con una cita.
  • Roles no revelados modelados a partir de comparables revelados para su época, rango de presupuesto y etapa profesional.
  • Backend, patrocinios y créditos de producción estimados a partir de medianas divulgadas
Tom Hiddleston

Fast Facts

BirthdateFebruary 9, 1981
BirthplaceWestminster
BreakthroughThor (2011)
Best KnownThe Avengers (2012)

Who Is Tom Hiddleston?

Tom Hiddleston was born February 9, 1981 in Westminster, best known for The Avengers (2012). The earnings behind Tom's net worth come from film salaries, backend participation, and endorsement deals.

The model tracks Tom's earning years from 2001 to 2026, with the biggest single year in 2017 at about $32.8 Million of gross income. After representation fees, taxes, and living costs, what stays invested compounds at market returns into an estimated $91.6 Million today.

Data

Cada línea a continuación se calcula a partir de datos públicos y las tablas de tarifas publicadas en nuestro página de metodología. Confianza: Grado C. Las cifras documentadas cubren sólo una pequeña parte de esta cifra, por lo que la mayor parte está modelada a partir de tasas publicadas y comparables (las calificaciones van desde A, en su mayoría documentada, hasta C, en su mayoría modelada).

The Calculation

Tom Hiddleston net worth line items
LineAmount
Revenue
Film pay, modeled lead roles (14 of 26 films)
era and budget-band medians of disclosed lead salaries (winsorized, thin cells shrunk toward the era median), blended with this actor's disclosed quote history when available; soft breakthrough blend near the career break year
$127,435,034
Film pay, modeled supporting and early roles (12 of 26 films)
2,5% de las medianas de la época: la tasa previa al estrellato
$10,361,999
Puntos backend, estimados
12% of disclosed lead deals included points, at a median 2.6% of box office; expected value on 10 commercially viable undisclosed lead roles; cash spread over 3 years
$27,912,713
Respaldos, estimados (1 asociación de marca)
1 named partnerships x the $4.0M annual fee from the median disclosed film deal x a 4-year term, spread across the deal years
$16,000,000
Residuos, estimados
SAG residual rates on post-theatrical receipts assumed at half of box office, split by role share and spread over the ten years after each release; 12 film(s) used band-specific box-office proxies
$58,464,366
Rentabilidad de la inversión sobre los ahorros
mixed portfolio: 55% actual 60/40 securities returns (taxed) + 45% US long-run home-price rate on the rest
$38,749,829
Expenses
Honorarios de representación
agente 10% + abogado 5%
-$34,771,566
Taxes
Tasas efectivas del Reino Unido, año tras año
-$78,815,550
Gastos personales
measured household savings rates by income, times a 88% entertainment-household factor
-$65,333,674
Patrimonio neto estimado$91,639,479

Película por película

Tom Hiddleston film-by-film pay
FilmYearRoleBudgetTaquillasPago contado
The Life of Chuck
no disclosed fee: modeled on the $23.8M shrunk median for 2020s/large (n=2), capped at $10.5M
2024Lead$70,000,000$21,300,000$10,498,294
Vengadores: final del juego
no disclosed fee: modeled on the $15.8M shrunk median for 2010s/blockbuster (n=11)
2019Lead$356,000,000$2,797,501,328$15,695,358
Vengadores: Guerra Infinita
no disclosed fee: modeled on the $15.8M shrunk median for 2010s/blockbuster (n=11)
2018Lead$400,000,000$2,048,359,754$15,625,998
Kong: Skull Island
no disclosed fee: modeled on the $15.8M shrunk median for 2010s/blockbuster (n=11)
2017Lead$300,000,000$566,652,812$15,492,693
Thor: Ragnarök
no disclosed fee: modeled on the $20.0M shrunk median for 2010s/tentpole (n=12)
2017Lead$180,000,000$853,977,126$19,649,269
Crimson Peak
no disclosed fee: modeled on the $20.0M shrunk median for 2010s/large (n=8), capped at $8.2M
2015Lead$55,000,000$74,679,822$7,746,489
High-Rise (film)
no disclosed fee: modeled on the $5.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid), capped at $1.2M
2015Lead$8,000,000$4,099,999$1,130,158
I Saw the Light (film)
no disclosed fee: modeled on the $5.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid), capped at $1.9M
2015Lead$13,000,000$1,800,000$1,831,431
Only Lovers Left Alive
soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.79): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $5.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid), capped at $1.1M vs early terms
2013Lead$7,000,000$7,600,000$857,037
Thor: The Dark World
soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.79): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $20.0M shrunk median for 2010s/tentpole (n=12) vs early terms
2013Lead$170,000,000$644,783,140$15,932,134
The Avengers (2012 film)
soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.66): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $15.8M shrunk median for 2010s/blockbuster (n=11) vs early terms
2012Lead$220,000,000$1,518,812,988$10,553,360
The Deep Blue Sea (2011 film)
soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.66): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $5.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid), capped at $1.2M vs early terms
2012Lead$8,000,000$3,100,000$835,313
Midnight in Paris
soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.50): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $5.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid), capped at $2.5M vs early terms
2011Lead$17,000,000$151,100,000$1,337,500
Thor (film)
soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.50): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $20.0M shrunk median for 2010s/tentpole (n=12) vs early terms
2011Lead$150,000,000$449,326,618$10,250,000
Archipelago (2010 film)
soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.34): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3), capped at $6.0M vs early terms
2010Lead$40,000,000$2,217,170
Return to Cranford
soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.21): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $19.4M shrunk median for 2000s/mid (n=2), capped at $6.0M vs early terms
2009Lead$40,000,000$1,634,981
Ivanov (play)
no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $19.4M shrunk median for 2000s/mid (n=2) (pre-stardom rate); soft-breakthrough weight 0.12
2008Lead$40,000,000$1,141,854
Miss Austen Regrets
no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $19.4M shrunk median for 2000s/mid (n=2) (pre-stardom rate); soft-breakthrough weight 0.12
2008Lead$40,000,000$1,141,854
Othello
no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $19.4M shrunk median for 2000s/mid (n=2) (pre-stardom rate); soft-breakthrough weight 0.12
2008Lead$40,000,000$1,141,854
Cymbeline
no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $19.4M shrunk median for 2000s/mid (n=2) (pre-stardom rate); soft-breakthrough weight 0.06
2007Lead$40,000,000$842,721
Unrelated
no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $18.8M median for its era and nearest band (mid) (pre-stardom rate), capped at 15% of budget; soft-breakthrough weight 0.06
2007Lead$300,137$45,021
Suburban Shootout
no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $19.4M shrunk median for 2000s/mid (n=2) (pre-stardom rate); soft-breakthrough weight 0.03
2006Lead$40,000,000$674,362
Unrelated
no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $18.8M median for its era and nearest band (mid) (pre-stardom rate), capped at 15% of budget; soft-breakthrough weight 0.03
2006Lead$275,996$41,399
The Gathering Storm (2002 film)
no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $19.4M shrunk median for 2000s/mid (n=2) (pre-stardom rate); soft-breakthrough weight 0.00
2002Lead$40,000,000$498,013
Conspiracy (2001 film)
no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $19.4M shrunk median for 2000s/mid (n=2) (pre-stardom rate); soft-breakthrough weight 0.00
2001Lead$40,000,000$491,385
Nicholas Nickleby
no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $19.4M shrunk median for 2000s/mid (n=2) (pre-stardom rate); soft-breakthrough weight 0.00
2001Lead$40,000,000$491,385

Cómo funcionan las figuras modeladas. An undisclosed lead role after the breakthrough gets the median of disclosed lead salaries for its era and budget band, capped at 15% of the film’s budget. Supporting and pre-breakthrough roles get 2.5% of that median, the documented going rate for actors before stardom. Films with no reported budget are treated as small productions. Undocumented backend, endorsements, and producer or director credits enter as separate estimated lines in the calculation above, built from disclosed medians. Every median comes from the published tables on our página de metodología.

Patrimonio neto Over Time

$25M$50M$75M200120062011201620212026$91.6 Million2001: $259,1412002: $323,0072003: $355,7892004: $378,8392005: $427,9532006: $600,5532007: $1,040,2612008: $1,655,0282009: $2,315,0552010: $3,711,1702011: $7,644,1222012: $12,705,4342013: $18,560,5322014: $22,360,8372015: $25,241,2002016: $29,507,0382017: $39,392,3942018: $44,643,3602019: $54,581,7452020: $61,272,4312021: $68,661,2912022: $65,141,6152023: $73,031,7872024: $81,790,4612025: $88,982,6952026: $91,639,479

Saldo modelado al final de cada año, que coincide con la tabla año por año a continuación.

Año tras año

Tom Hiddleston year by year model
YearIncomeHonorarios de representanteTasa impositivaSpentSavedBalance
2026$3,734,948$560,24240%$1,049,939$854,885$91,639,479
2025$3,782,812$567,42240%$1,063,394$865,840$88,982,695
2024$11,118,966$1,667,84540%$3,125,675$2,544,998$81,790,461
2023$7,307,164$1,096,07540%$2,054,131$1,672,522$73,031,787
2022$5,061,692$759,25440%$1,422,902$1,158,561$65,141,615
2021$8,274,617$1,241,19340%$2,326,094$1,893,961$68,661,291
2020$10,407,518$1,561,12840%$2,925,678$2,382,156$61,272,431
2019$21,224,537$3,183,68040%$5,966,472$4,858,042$54,581,745
2018$21,936,120$3,290,41840%$6,166,507$5,020,915$44,643,360
2017$32,759,181$4,913,87740%$9,208,999$7,498,184$39,392,394
2016$12,605,800$1,890,87040%$3,543,642$2,885,316$29,507,038
2015$10,177,090$1,526,56440%$2,860,902$2,329,414$25,241,200
2014$11,368,331$1,705,25040%$3,195,774$2,602,075$22,360,837
2013$20,133,852$3,020,07840%$5,659,867$4,608,397$18,560,532
2012$19,861,659$2,979,24940%$5,583,351$4,546,095$12,705,434
2011$16,556,331$2,483,45040%$4,654,183$3,789,546$7,644,122
2010$5,402,199$810,33040%$1,518,623$1,236,499$3,711,170
2009$2,142,059$321,30940%$602,159$490,292$2,315,055
2008$3,096,282$464,44240%$870,402$708,702$1,655,028
2007$1,815,290$272,29440%$510,300$415,498$1,040,261
2006$891,881$133,78240%$306,757$148,102$600,553
2005$339,255$50,88840%$136,478$36,542$427,953
2004$124,526$18,67940%$57,361$6,148$378,839
2003$124,526$18,67940%$57,361$6,148$355,789
2002$431,627$64,74440%$148,455$71,674$323,007
2001$1,132,175$169,82640%$318,268$259,141$259,141

Model Notes

  • PROXY DE RESIDENCIA: residencia no obtenida individualmente para este lote; El valor predeterminado de EE. UU.-CA se aplica hasta que se documente
  • salary comps: 2 disclosed lead fee(s) flagged as non-market outliers (scale / far-below-quote) and excluded from era medians
  • Crédito de la imagen: Wikimedia Commons via Wikipedia (Tom Hiddleston)
Reproduce este número. Una estimación del patrimonio neto debería ser reproducible del mismo modo que lo es un hallazgo científico: las mismas aportaciones públicas y las mismas tarifas publicadas deberían dar siempre la misma respuesta. Los presupuestos cinematográficos y la taquilla son informes públicos. Cada salario, tasa de honorarios, tasa impositiva, tasa de ahorro y rendimiento de referencia divulgados se publica con citas en nuestro página de metodología. Undisclosed lead roles use the median of disclosed salaries for their era and budget band, capped at 15% of the film’s budget. Supporting and early-career roles use the documented pre-stardom fraction of that median. Undocumented backend, endorsements, and hyphenate credits enter as estimated lines from disclosed medians. Apply the rates year by year as shown above and you will land on $91.6 Million.

Metodología

We rebuild Tom’s career as a yearly time series. Disclosed salaries and documented backend enter as reported, with citations. Undisclosed lead roles get the median of disclosed salaries for their era and budget band, capped at 15% of the film’s budget. Supporting roles and roles from before the breakthrough get 2.5% of that median, the going-rate ratio measured from disclosed pre-stardom deals. Films with no reported budget are treated as small productions, and every role is estimated unless a source documents it was unpaid. Representation fees come out at sourced rates, taxes follow the eras actually lived through, spending follows measured household savings behavior unless court documents say otherwise, and what remains compounds at real market returns. Undocumented backend enters as an expected value from disclosed deals, endorsements at the median disclosed ambassador fee, and producer or director credits at union-scale floors.

El modelo completo, cada tabla de tarifas y cómo nuestras estimaciones se han comparado con ofertas reales están en el sitio. página de metodología.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Tom Hiddleston's net worth in 2026?

As of 2026, Tom Hiddleston's net worth is an estimated $91.6 Million. The estimate is built film by film from disclosed salaries and documented backend, then year by year: income, minus representation fees and taxes, minus spending, compounded at real market returns.

How does Tom Hiddleston make money?

Salarios cinematográficos y participación backend documentada.

How is Tom Hiddleston's net worth calculated?

Los días de pago divulgados ingresan según lo informado, con citaciones. Los papeles principales no revelados utilizan la mediana de los salarios revelados para su época y banda presupuestaria, con un límite del 15% del presupuesto de la película, y los papeles secundarios o de inicio de carrera utilizan la fracción documentada previa al estrellato de esa mediana. Restamos los honorarios de representación, los impuestos de los años en que Tom realmente trabajó y el gasto del comportamiento de ahorro medido, y luego lo componemos con rendimientos reales del mercado. Backend indocumentados, respaldos y créditos de producción ingresan como líneas estimadas a partir de las medianas divulgadas. Se publican todas las tarifas y fuentes.

How much does Tom Hiddleston make per film?

Varía según el papel y la época, y la tabla película por película anterior enumera el pago contado para cada título. Los días de pago divulgados ingresan según lo informado. Los papeles no revelados se modelan a partir de lo que ganaron actores comparables en la misma época y rango de presupuesto, siendo los papeles principales después del gran avance los que ganan más y los papeles secundarios o iniciales una fracción documentada de eso.

¿Por qué el tipo impositivo es tan alto y los actores no lo evitan con una empresa de préstamo?

El impuesto se aplica a la tasa efectiva del lugar donde vivió Tom cada año, que es la tasa que se muestra en la tabla año por año. En un estado con impuestos altos como California, el impuesto sobre la renta federal y estatal combinado alcanza cerca de la mitad de los ingresos de una persona con mayores ingresos, por lo que esos años rondan el 40 por ciento. Una empresa de préstamos, la corporación a través de la cual muchos actores administran sus ingresos, no reduce el impuesto sobre el dinero que se llevan a casa. Su verdadera ventaja es deducir los costos comerciales, como los honorarios de agentes, gerentes y abogados, y el modelo ya los resta como una línea separada antes de aplicar cualquier impuesto. Las empresas con altos ingresos también quedan fuera de la deducción empresarial de transferencia que otros propietarios de empresas pueden reclamar, por lo que no les permite obtener ningún recorte de tasas.

¿Por qué esta cifra es diferente a la de otros sitios de patrimonio neto?

Most sites publish a single number with no way to check it. This estimate is built in the open: every salary, rate, and assumption is on the page, and the página de metodología lists every source.

¿Qué tan precisa es esta estimación?

Ninguna estimación del patrimonio neto de un particular es exacta; éste es un modelo construido a partir de datos públicos. La diferencia es que puedes ver cómo se construyó y comprobar cada paso. El grado de confianza cerca de la parte superior del cálculo muestra qué parte de la cifra se basa en números revelados, y la página indica dónde se apoya un número en una suposición.

Is Tom Hiddleston rich compared to the average person?

Yes. A net worth of $91.6 Million is far above the median American household, which sits near $193,000 according to Federal Reserve data.

What is Tom Hiddleston's biggest source of wealth?

On this page it is film salaries, the largest line in the calculation at $127.4 Million. The full breakdown, with every other line and its source, is above.

How much does Tom Hiddleston make from endorsements?

The model counts $16.0 Million in career endorsement income for Tom: 1 named partnerships x the $4.0M annual fee from the median disclosed film deal x a 4-year term, spread across the deal years. It is an estimate, since the individual deal values are not all public, and it sits as its own line in the calculation above.

Explora otros actores

Acerca de NetWorth Explained

We originally created NWE because nobody in the public-figure net worth space showed their work. Magazines and sites threw out big numbers while hiding behind vague claims of “proprietary algorithms” o “insider knowledge.” That’s why we started the world’s only publication that transparently showed every assumption, every variable, and every calculation. We’re still the only ones who do it this way. Leer más sobre NetWorth Explained.