Drew Barrymore 순자산 2026
최종 업데이트 August 3, 2026
As of 2026, Drew Barrymore has an estimated net worth of $347.0 Million, computed film by film and year by year from public records and published rates. Every input, rate, and source behind the number is on this page.
Calculation
- 공개된 급여 및 문서화된 백엔드(각각 인용 포함)
- 시대, 예산 범위, 경력 단계에 따라 공개된 비교 대상을 모델로 한 비공개 역할
- 공개된 중앙값에서 추정된 백엔드, 보증 및 생성 크레딧

Fast Facts
| Birthdate | February 22, 1975 |
|---|---|
| Birthplace | Culver City |
| Breakthrough | E.T. the Extra-Terrestrial (1982) |
| Best Known | Charlie's Angels (2000) |
Who Is Drew Barrymore?
Drew Barrymore was born February 22, 1975 in Culver City, best known for Charlie's Angels (2000). The earnings behind Drew's net worth come from film salaries, backend participation, and endorsement deals.
The model tracks Drew's earning years from 1979 to 2026, with the biggest single year in 2020 at about $25.5 Million of gross income. After representation fees, taxes, and living costs, what stays invested compounds at market returns into an estimated $347.0 Million today.
Data
아래의 모든 라인은 공개 데이터와 당사에 게시된 요율표를 바탕으로 계산되었습니다. 방법론 페이지. 신뢰: C등급. 문서화된 숫자는 이 수치의 작은 부분만을 차지하므로 대부분은 게시된 요율 및 비교 항목(등급은 주로 문서화된 A부터 대부분 모델링된 C까지)을 기준으로 모델링됩니다.
The Calculation
| Line | Amount |
|---|---|
| Revenue | |
| Film pay, modeled lead roles (70 of 98 films) era and budget-band medians of disclosed lead salaries (winsorized, thin cells shrunk toward the era median), blended with this actor's disclosed quote history when available; soft breakthrough blend near the career break year | $340,482,746 |
| Film pay, modeled post-breakthrough supporting roles (27 of 98 films) 12.0% of lead cells: lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio | $56,078,591 |
| Film pay, modeled supporting and early roles (1 of 98 films) 시대 중앙값의 2.5%: 스타덤에 오르기 전 비율 | $550,981 |
| 백엔드 포인트, 추정 12% of disclosed lead deals included points, at a median 2.6% of box office; expected value on 53 commercially viable undisclosed lead roles; cash spread over 3 years; 27 film(s) used band-specific box-office/budget multiples as a gross proxy | $14,811,854 |
| 추천 수, 추정(2개 브랜드 파트너십) 2 named partnerships x the $4.0M annual fee from the median disclosed film deal x a 4-year term, spread across the deal years | $32,000,000 |
| 잔차, 추정 SAG residual rates on post-theatrical receipts assumed at half of box office, split by role share and spread over the ten years after each release; 46 film(s) used band-specific box-office proxies | $35,045,071 |
| TV: Lindsay Rule 6 episodes; guest default per credited year; network not identified, priced on the broadcast cell; priced from tv_episode_rates.csv (en.wikipedia.org) | $30,000 |
| The Drew Barrymore Show daytime talk host pay; entered at $5M/yr for 2020-25 seasons as a mid-market host floor | $30,000,000 |
| 저축에 대한 투자 수익 mixed portfolio: 55% actual 60/40 securities returns (taxed) + 45% US long-run home-price rate on the rest | $242,073,372 |
| Expenses | |
| 대리 수수료 대리인 10% + 변호사 5% | -$75,417,654 |
| Taxes US-NY 실질 요율, 연도별 | -$193,514,320 |
| 개인 지출 measured household savings rates by income, times a 88% entertainment-household factor | -$128,946,303 |
| 추정 순자산 | $346,979,453 |
영화별 영화
| Film | Year | Role | Budget | 매표소 | 계산된 급여 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Influenced no disclosed fee: modeled on the $23.8M shrunk median for 2020s/large (n=2), capped at $10.5M | 2026 | Lead | $70,000,000 | – | $10,500,000 |
| Outcome no disclosed fee: modeled on the $23.8M shrunk median for 2020s/large (n=2), capped at $10.5M | 2026 | Lead | $70,000,000 | – | $10,500,000 |
| Hollywood Squares no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $23.8M shrunk median for 2020s/large (n=2) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio) | 2025 | Supporting | $70,000,000 | – | $2,850,000 |
| Child Star no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $23.8M shrunk median for 2020s/large (n=2) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio) | 2024 | Supporting | $70,000,000 | – | $2,850,000 |
| Princess Power no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $23.8M shrunk median for 2020s/large (n=2) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio) | 2024 | Supporting | $70,000,000 | – | $2,850,000 |
| Smile 2 no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $21.7M shrunk median for 2020s/mid (n=1) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio) | 2024 | Supporting | $28,000,000 | $138,100,000 | $2,600,000 |
| And Just Like That... no disclosed fee: modeled on the $23.8M shrunk median for 2020s/large (n=2), capped at $10.5M | 2023 | Lead | $70,000,000 | – | $10,500,000 |
| Jackpot no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $23.8M shrunk median for 2020s/large (n=2) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio) | 2023 | Supporting | $70,000,000 | – | $2,850,000 |
| The Eric Andre Show no disclosed fee: modeled on the $23.8M shrunk median for 2020s/large (n=2), capped at $10.5M | 2023 | Lead | $70,000,000 | – | $10,500,000 |
| Ziwe no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $23.8M shrunk median for 2020s/large (n=2) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio) | 2022 | Supporting | $70,000,000 | – | $2,850,000 |
| A Castle for Christmas no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $23.8M shrunk median for 2020s/large (n=2) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio) | 2021 | Supporting | $70,000,000 | – | $2,850,000 |
| Armchair Expert with Dax Shepard no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $23.8M shrunk median for 2020s/large (n=2) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio) | 2021 | Supporting | $70,000,000 | – | $2,850,000 |
| Rebel Homemaker: Food, Family, Life no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $23.8M shrunk median for 2020s/large (n=2) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio) | 2021 | Supporting | $70,000,000 | – | $2,850,000 |
| Beat Bobby Flay no disclosed fee: modeled on the $23.8M shrunk median for 2020s/large (n=2), capped at $10.5M | 2020 | Lead | $70,000,000 | – | $10,500,000 |
| Martha Knows Best no disclosed fee: modeled on the $23.8M shrunk median for 2020s/large (n=2), capped at $10.5M | 2020 | Lead | $70,000,000 | – | $10,500,000 |
| The Drew Barrymore Show no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $23.8M shrunk median for 2020s/large (n=2) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio) | 2020 | Supporting | $70,000,000 | – | $2,850,000 |
| The Stand In no disclosed fee: modeled on the $25.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid), capped at $0.0M | 2020 | Lead | $100,884 | $100,884 | $15,133 |
| Charlie's Angels no disclosed fee: modeled on the $20.0M shrunk median for 2010s/large (n=8), capped at $7.7M | 2019 | Lead | $51,500,000 | $264,100,000 | $7,725,000 |
| The World's Best no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio) | 2019 | Supporting | $40,000,000 | – | $1,320,000 |
| First Dates no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio) | 2017 | Supporting | $40,000,000 | – | $1,320,000 |
| Freak Show no disclosed fee: modeled on the $5.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid), capped at $0.3M | 2017 | Lead | $2,000,000 | $20,657 | $300,000 |
| Odd Mom Out no disclosed fee: modeled on the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3), capped at $6.0M | 2016 | Lead | $40,000,000 | – | $6,000,000 |
| Santa Clarita Diet no disclosed fee: modeled on the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3), capped at $6.0M | 2016 | Lead | $40,000,000 | – | $6,000,000 |
| Miss You Already no disclosed fee: modeled on the $5.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid), capped at $1.2M | 2015 | Lead | $8,199,999 | $8,199,999 | $1,230,000 |
| Wildflower no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio) | 2015 | Supporting | $40,000,000 | – | $1,320,000 |
| Animal no disclosed fee: modeled on the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3), capped at $6.0M | 2014 | Lead | $40,000,000 | – | $6,000,000 |
| Blended no disclosed fee: modeled on the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3), capped at $6.4M | 2014 | Lead | $42,500,000 | $128,000,000 | $6,375,000 |
| Big Miracle no disclosed fee: modeled on the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3), capped at $6.0M | 2012 | Lead | $40,000,000 | $24,700,000 | $6,000,000 |
| Best Coast no disclosed fee: modeled on the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3), capped at $6.0M | 2011 | Lead | $40,000,000 | – | $6,000,000 |
| Charlie's Angels no disclosed fee: modeled on the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3), capped at $6.0M | 2011 | Lead | $40,000,000 | $264,100,000 | $6,000,000 |
| Going the Distance no disclosed fee: modeled on the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3), capped at $4.8M | 2010 | Lead | $32,000,000 | $42,100,000 | $4,800,000 |
| Everybody's Fine no disclosed fee: modeled on the $19.4M shrunk median for 2000s/mid (n=2), capped at $3.1M | 2009 | Lead | $20,500,000 | $16,399,999 | $3,075,000 |
| Grey Gardens no disclosed fee: modeled on the $19.4M shrunk median for 2000s/mid (n=2), capped at $6.0M | 2009 | Lead | $40,000,000 | $36,923 | $6,000,000 |
| He's Just Not That Into You no disclosed fee: modeled on the $19.4M shrunk median for 2000s/mid (n=2), capped at $6.0M | 2009 | Lead | $40,000,000 | $178,000,000 | $6,000,000 |
| List of directorial debuts no disclosed fee: modeled on the $19.4M shrunk median for 2000s/mid (n=2), capped at $6.0M | 2009 | Lead | $40,000,000 | – | $6,000,000 |
| Whip It no disclosed fee: modeled on the $18.8M median for its era and nearest band (mid), capped at $2.2M | 2009 | Lead | $15,000,000 | $16,600,000 | $2,250,000 |
| Beverly Hills Chihuahua no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $18.8M median for its era and nearest band (mid) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio), capped at 15% of budget | 2008 | Supporting | $12,000,000 | $149,281,606 | $1,800,000 |
| Lucky You no disclosed fee: modeled on the $20.0M shrunk median for 2000s/large (n=18), capped at $8.2M | 2007 | Lead | $55,000,000 | $8,400,000 | $8,250,000 |
| Music and Lyrics no disclosed fee: modeled on the $19.4M shrunk median for 2000s/mid (n=2), capped at $6.0M | 2007 | Lead | $40,000,000 | $145,900,000 | $6,000,000 |
| Curious George no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $20.0M shrunk median for 2000s/large (n=18) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio) | 2006 | Supporting | $50,000,000 | $71,100,000 | $2,400,000 |
| Fever Pitch no disclosed fee: modeled on the $19.4M shrunk median for 2000s/mid (n=2), capped at $4.5M | 2005 | Lead | $30,000,000 | $50,600,000 | $4,499,999 |
| Stewie Griffin: The Untold Story no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $19.4M shrunk median for 2000s/mid (n=2) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio) | 2005 | Supporting | $40,000,000 | – | $2,325,000 |
| 50 First Dates no disclosed fee: modeled on the $20.0M shrunk median for 2000s/large (n=18), capped at $11.2M | 2004 | Lead | $75,000,000 | $198,500,000 | $11,249,995 |
| Choose or Lose Presents: The Best Place to Start no disclosed fee: modeled on the $19.4M shrunk median for 2000s/mid (n=2), capped at $6.0M | 2004 | Lead | $40,000,000 | – | $5,999,998 |
| Charlie's Angels no disclosed fee: modeled on the $19.4M shrunk median for 2000s/mid (n=2), capped at $6.0M | 2003 | Lead | $40,000,000 | $264,100,000 | $5,999,995 |
| Charlie's Angels: Full Throttle no disclosed fee: modeled on the $11.8M shrunk median for 2000s/tentpole (n=9) | 2003 | Lead | $120,000,000 | $259,200,000 | $11,818,172 |
| Duplex no disclosed fee: modeled on the $19.4M shrunk median for 2000s/mid (n=2), capped at $6.0M | 2003 | Lead | $40,000,000 | $19,300,000 | $5,999,995 |
| Confessions of a Dangerous Mind no disclosed fee: modeled on the $19.4M shrunk median for 2000s/mid (n=2), capped at $4.5M | 2002 | Lead | $30,000,000 | $33,000,000 | $4,499,993 |
| Donnie Darko no disclosed fee: modeled on the $18.8M median for its era and nearest band (mid), capped at $0.7M | 2001 | Lead | $4,500,000 | $7,500,000 | $674,999 |
| Freddy Got Fingered no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $18.8M median for its era and nearest band (mid) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio), capped at 15% of budget | 2001 | Supporting | $14,000,000 | $14,300,000 | $2,099,995 |
| Riding in Cars with Boys no disclosed fee: modeled on the $19.4M shrunk median for 2000s/mid (n=2), capped at $7.0M | 2001 | Lead | $47,000,000 | $35,700,000 | $7,049,979 |
| Charlie's Angels no disclosed fee: modeled on the $20.0M shrunk median for 2000s/large (n=18), capped at $13.9M | 2000 | Lead | $93,000,000 | $264,100,000 | $13,949,917 |
| Skipped Parts no disclosed fee: modeled on the $19.4M shrunk median for 2000s/mid (n=2), capped at $6.0M | 2000 | Lead | $40,000,000 | – | $5,999,966 |
| Titan A.E. no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $20.0M shrunk median for 2000s/large (n=18) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio) | 2000 | Supporting | $82,500,000 | $36,800,000 | $2,399,988 |
| Family Guy no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $14.4M shrunk median for 1990s/mid (n=6) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio) | 1999 | Supporting | $26,000,000 | – | $1,724,984 |
| Never Been Kissed no disclosed fee: modeled on the $14.4M shrunk median for 1990s/mid (n=6), capped at $3.8M | 1999 | Lead | $25,000,000 | $84,600,000 | $3,749,959 |
| Olive, the Other Reindeer no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $14.4M shrunk median for 1990s/mid (n=6) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio) | 1999 | Supporting | $26,000,000 | – | $1,724,984 |
| Swirl 360 no disclosed fee: modeled on the $14.4M shrunk median for 1990s/mid (n=6), capped at $3.9M | 1999 | Lead | $26,000,000 | – | $3,899,958 |
| The Simpsons no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $14.6M shrunk median for 1990s/large (n=3) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio) | 1999 | Supporting | $75,000,000 | $536,400,000 | $1,751,983 |
| Ever After no disclosed fee: modeled on the $14.4M shrunk median for 1990s/mid (n=6), capped at $3.8M | 1998 | Lead | $25,500,000 | $98,000,000 | $3,824,919 |
| Home Fries no disclosed fee: modeled on the $10.0M shrunk median for 1990s/small (n=1), capped at $2.2M | 1998 | Lead | $15,000,000 | $10,400,000 | $2,249,953 |
| The Larry Sanders Show no disclosed fee: modeled on the $14.4M shrunk median for 1990s/mid (n=6), capped at $3.9M | 1998 | Lead | $26,000,000 | – | $3,899,917 |
| The Wedding Singer no disclosed fee: modeled on the $10.0M shrunk median for 1990s/small (n=1), capped at $2.7M | 1998 | Lead | $18,000,000 | $123,300,000 | $2,699,943 |
| Best Men no disclosed fee: modeled on the $10.0M shrunk median for 1990s/small (n=1), capped at $2.1M | 1997 | Lead | $14,000,000 | $5,000 | $2,099,916 |
| Wishful Thinking no disclosed fee: modeled on the $14.4M shrunk median for 1990s/mid (n=6), capped at $3.9M | 1997 | Lead | $26,000,000 | – | $3,899,839 |
| Bill Nye the Science Guy no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $14.4M shrunk median for 1990s/mid (n=6) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio) | 1996 | Supporting | $26,000,000 | – | $1,724,879 |
| Everyone Says I Love You no disclosed fee: modeled on the $14.4M shrunk median for 1990s/mid (n=6), capped at $3.0M | 1996 | Lead | $20,000,000 | $9,800,000 | $2,999,767 |
| Scream no disclosed fee: modeled on the $14.4M shrunk median for 1990s/mid (n=6), capped at $3.6M | 1996 | Lead | $24,000,000 | $140,041,405 | $3,599,713 |
| Batman Forever no disclosed fee: modeled on the $12.8M shrunk median for 1990s/tentpole (n=1) | 1995 | Lead | $100,000,000 | $336,567,158 | $12,831,179 |
| Boys on the Side no disclosed fee: modeled on the $14.4M shrunk median for 1990s/mid (n=6), capped at $3.1M | 1995 | Lead | $21,000,000 | $47,400,000 | $3,149,519 |
| Mad Love no disclosed fee: modeled on the $14.4M shrunk median for 1990s/mid (n=6), capped at $3.9M | 1995 | Lead | $26,000,000 | $15,453,274 | $3,899,390 |
| You Got It no disclosed fee: modeled on the $14.4M shrunk median for 1990s/mid (n=6), capped at $3.9M | 1995 | Lead | $26,000,000 | – | $3,899,390 |
| Bad Girls no disclosed fee: modeled on the $14.4M shrunk median for 1990s/mid (n=6), capped at $4.5M | 1994 | Lead | $30,000,000 | $23,000,000 | $4,498,611 |
| Inside the Goldmine no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $14.4M shrunk median for 1990s/mid (n=6) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio) | 1994 | Supporting | $26,000,000 | – | $1,724,542 |
| Doppelganger no disclosed fee: modeled on the $2.0M median for its era and nearest band (small), capped at $0.5M | 1993 | Lead | $3,000,000 | – | $449,739 |
| No Place to Hide no disclosed fee: modeled on the $14.4M shrunk median for 1990s/mid (n=6), capped at $3.9M | 1993 | Lead | $26,000,000 | $135,004 | $3,897,688 |
| The Amy Fisher Story no disclosed fee: modeled on the $14.4M shrunk median for 1990s/mid (n=6), capped at $3.9M | 1993 | Lead | $26,000,000 | – | $3,897,688 |
| Wayne's World 2 no disclosed fee: modeled on the $14.4M shrunk median for 1990s/mid (n=6), capped at $6.0M | 1993 | Lead | $40,000,000 | $48,197,805 | $5,996,317 |
| 2000 Malibu Road no disclosed fee: modeled on the $14.4M shrunk median for 1990s/mid (n=6), capped at $3.9M | 1992 | Lead | $26,000,000 | – | $3,895,500 |
| Guncrazy no disclosed fee: modeled on the $14.4M shrunk median for 1990s/mid (n=6), capped at $3.9M | 1992 | Lead | $26,000,000 | $114,516 | $3,895,500 |
| Poison Ivy no disclosed fee: modeled on the $2.0M median for its era and nearest band (small), capped at $0.5M | 1992 | Lead | $3,000,000 | $1,800,000 | $449,492 |
| Sketch Artist no disclosed fee: modeled on the $14.4M shrunk median for 1990s/mid (n=6), capped at $3.9M | 1992 | Lead | $26,000,000 | – | $3,895,500 |
| Waxwork II: Lost in Time no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $14.4M shrunk median for 1990s/mid (n=6) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio) | 1992 | Supporting | $26,000,000 | – | $1,723,264 |
| Motorama no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $14.4M shrunk median for 1990s/mid (n=6) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio) | 1991 | Supporting | $26,000,000 | $10,535 | $1,721,623 |
| CBS Schoolbreak Special no disclosed fee: modeled on the $4.1M shrunk median for pre1990/small (n=2), capped at $2.1M | 1989 | Lead | $14,000,000 | – | $2,081,397 |
| Far from Home no disclosed fee: modeled on the $4.1M shrunk median for pre1990/small (n=2), capped at $2.1M | 1989 | Lead | $14,000,000 | $11,859 | $2,081,397 |
| See You in the Morning no disclosed fee: modeled on the $4.1M shrunk median for pre1990/small (n=2), capped at $2.1M | 1989 | Lead | $14,000,000 | $4,795,009 | $2,081,397 |
| Conspiracy of Love no disclosed fee: modeled on the $4.1M shrunk median for pre1990/small (n=2), capped at $2.1M | 1987 | Lead | $14,000,000 | – | $2,031,217 |
| Babes in Toyland no disclosed fee: modeled on the $4.1M shrunk median for pre1990/small (n=2), capped at $0.8M | 1986 | Lead | $5,000,000 | – | $707,973 |
| Rock 'n' Roll to the Rescue no disclosed fee: modeled on the $4.1M shrunk median for pre1990/small (n=2), capped at $2.1M | 1986 | Lead | $14,000,000 | – | $1,970,265 |
| The Ray Bradbury Theatre no disclosed fee: modeled on the $4.1M shrunk median for pre1990/small (n=2), capped at $2.1M | 1986 | Lead | $14,000,000 | – | $1,970,265 |
| ABC Weekend Specials no disclosed fee: modeled on the $4.1M shrunk median for pre1990/small (n=2), capped at $2.1M | 1985 | Lead | $14,000,000 | – | $1,861,967 |
| Cat's Eye no disclosed fee: modeled on the $4.1M shrunk median for pre1990/small (n=2), capped at $1.1M | 1985 | Lead | $7,000,000 | $13,100,000 | $937,130 |
| Star Fairies no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $4.1M shrunk median for pre1990/small (n=2) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio) | 1985 | Supporting | $14,000,000 | – | $448,287 |
| Firestarter soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.79): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $4.1M shrunk median for pre1990/small (n=2), capped at $1.8M vs early terms | 1984 | Lead | $12,000,000 | $18,900,000 | $1,446,017 |
| Irreconcilable Differences soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.79): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $4.1M shrunk median for pre1990/small (n=2), capped at $1.2M vs early terms | 1984 | Lead | $8,000,000 | $12,000,000 | $971,183 |
| E.T. the Extra-Terrestrial soft-breakthrough supporting blend (w=0.50) | 1982 | Supporting | $10,500,000 | $797,300,000 | $299,062 |
| Altered States soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.21): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $4.1M shrunk median for pre1990/small (n=2), capped at $2.2M vs early terms | 1980 | Lead | $15,000,000 | $19,900,000 | $550,981 |
모델링된 수치의 작동 방식. An undisclosed lead role after the breakthrough gets the median of disclosed lead salaries for its era and budget band, capped at 15% of the film’s budget. Supporting and pre-breakthrough roles get 2.5% of that median, the documented going rate for actors before stardom. Films with no reported budget are treated as small productions. Undocumented backend, endorsements, and producer or director credits enter as separate estimated lines in the calculation above, built from disclosed medians. Every median comes from the published tables on our 방법론 페이지.
순자산 Over Time
아래의 연도별 표와 일치하는 매년 말의 모델링된 잔액입니다.
해마다
| Year | Income | 담당자 수수료 | 세율 | Spent | Saved | Balance |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | $15,830,737 | $2,374,611 | 45% | $4,079,359 | $3,321,510 | $346,979,453 |
| 2025 | $14,419,230 | $2,162,885 | 45% | $3,715,634 | $3,025,356 | $336,836,994 |
| 2024 | $12,844,004 | $1,926,601 | 45% | $3,309,720 | $2,694,852 | $311,147,353 |
| 2023 | $25,165,683 | $3,774,852 | 45% | $6,484,844 | $5,280,113 | $285,613,820 |
| 2022 | $15,124,017 | $2,268,603 | 45% | $3,897,248 | $3,173,231 | $257,302,202 |
| 2021 | $13,217,729 | $1,982,659 | 45% | $3,406,024 | $2,773,265 | $272,710,072 |
| 2020 | $25,474,948 | $3,821,242 | 45% | $6,564,537 | $5,345,001 | $248,973,603 |
| 2019 | $14,391,183 | $2,158,677 | 45% | $3,708,406 | $3,019,472 | $226,778,084 |
| 2018 | $3,508,187 | $526,228 | 45% | $904,011 | $736,067 | $202,237,874 |
| 2017 | $2,018,639 | $302,796 | 47% | $501,260 | $408,137 | $200,331,869 |
| 2016 | $9,899,897 | $1,484,985 | 47% | $2,458,299 | $2,001,605 | $185,783,127 |
| 2015 | $6,281,386 | $942,208 | 47% | $1,559,766 | $1,269,998 | $174,701,583 |
| 2014 | $10,357,391 | $1,553,609 | 47% | $2,571,902 | $2,094,103 | $169,318,417 |
| 2013 | $5,103,655 | $765,548 | 47% | $1,267,317 | $1,031,879 | $157,601,185 |
| 2012 | $5,639,069 | $845,860 | 43% | $1,505,950 | $1,226,180 | $143,381,702 |
| 2011 | $11,738,441 | $1,760,766 | 43% | $3,134,826 | $2,552,449 | $133,256,644 |
| 2010 | $8,336,121 | $1,250,418 | 43% | $2,226,214 | $1,812,636 | $125,870,758 |
| 2009 | $19,250,293 | $2,887,544 | 43% | $5,140,914 | $4,185,853 | $116,125,991 |
| 2008 | $9,613,371 | $1,442,006 | 43% | $2,567,312 | $2,090,366 | $102,178,863 |
| 2007 | $11,857,863 | $1,778,679 | 43% | $3,166,718 | $2,578,416 | $110,023,631 |
| 2006 | $7,508,224 | $1,126,234 | 43% | $2,005,119 | $1,632,615 | $102,785,929 |
| 2005 | $7,809,135 | $1,171,370 | 43% | $2,085,479 | $1,698,046 | $94,846,829 |
| 2004 | $16,276,946 | $2,441,542 | 43% | $4,346,862 | $3,539,318 | $89,875,516 |
| 2003 | $23,471,020 | $3,520,653 | 43% | $6,268,086 | $5,103,623 | $81,887,846 |
| 2002 | $11,767,492 | $1,765,124 | 46% | $2,977,185 | $2,424,094 | $69,930,588 |
| 2001 | $9,770,869 | $1,465,630 | 46% | $2,472,038 | $2,012,791 | $69,603,652 |
| 2000 | $20,226,777 | $3,034,017 | 46% | $5,117,391 | $4,166,700 | $67,619,938 |
| 1999 | $16,855,852 | $2,528,378 | 46% | $4,264,544 | $3,472,292 | $62,466,578 |
| 1998 | $13,728,076 | $2,059,211 | 46% | $3,473,214 | $2,827,973 | $55,084,010 |
| 1997 | $9,151,083 | $1,372,662 | 46% | $2,315,231 | $1,885,116 | $47,277,375 |
| 1996 | $8,656,353 | $1,298,453 | 46% | $2,190,064 | $1,783,202 | $40,573,905 |
| 1995 | $19,883,455 | $2,982,518 | 46% | $5,030,530 | $4,095,976 | $35,954,421 |
| 1994 | $11,883,058 | $1,782,459 | 46% | $3,006,423 | $2,447,900 | $28,056,285 |
| 1993 | $12,171,433 | $1,825,715 | 46% | $3,079,382 | $2,507,305 | $25,151,631 |
| 1992 | $14,263,829 | $2,139,574 | 36% | $4,277,049 | $3,482,474 | $21,391,682 |
| 1991 | $5,576,461 | $836,469 | 36% | $1,672,117 | $1,361,477 | $17,068,735 |
| 1990 | $741,856 | $111,278 | 36% | $222,448 | $181,122 | $14,083,842 |
| 1989 | $4,600,299 | $690,045 | 36% | $1,379,412 | $1,123,150 | $13,538,902 |
| 1988 | $2,124,853 | $318,728 | 36% | $637,143 | $518,777 | $11,126,767 |
| 1987 | $1,693,674 | $254,051 | 45% | $436,436 | $355,357 | $9,906,954 |
| 1986 | $4,127,843 | $619,176 | 55% | $870,290 | $708,610 | $9,214,241 |
| 1985 | $11,874,011 | $1,781,102 | 55% | $2,503,445 | $2,038,364 | $7,825,634 |
| 1984 | $10,824,436 | $1,623,665 | 55% | $2,282,159 | $1,858,188 | $5,132,433 |
| 1983 | $8,851,792 | $1,327,769 | 54% | $1,907,731 | $1,553,320 | $3,094,583 |
| 1982 | $8,221,164 | $1,233,175 | 54% | $1,771,819 | $1,442,656 | $1,510,672 |
| 1981 | $101,539 | $15,231 | 55% | $35,079 | $3,760 | $66,666 |
| 1980 | $385,687 | $57,853 | 55% | $99,491 | $48,034 | $61,658 |
| 1979 | $165,294 | $24,794 | 55% | $49,872 | $13,353 | $13,353 |
Model Notes
- 거주지 프록시: 이 배치에 대해 개별적으로 공급되지 않은 거주지입니다. 문서화될 때까지 US-CA 기본값 적용
- salary comps: 2 disclosed lead fee(s) flagged as non-market outliers (scale / far-below-quote) and excluded from era medians
- 이미지 출처: Wikimedia Commons via Wikipedia (Drew Barrymore)
방법론
We rebuild Drew’s career as a yearly time series. Disclosed salaries and documented backend enter as reported, with citations. Undisclosed lead roles get the median of disclosed salaries for their era and budget band, capped at 15% of the film’s budget. Supporting roles and roles from before the breakthrough get 2.5% of that median, the going-rate ratio measured from disclosed pre-stardom deals. Films with no reported budget are treated as small productions, and every role is estimated unless a source documents it was unpaid. Representation fees come out at sourced rates, taxes follow the eras actually lived through, spending follows measured household savings behavior unless court documents say otherwise, and what remains compounds at real market returns. Undocumented backend enters as an expected value from disclosed deals, endorsements at the median disclosed ambassador fee, and producer or director credits at union-scale floors.
전체 모델, 모든 요율표 및 실제 거래와 비교하여 추정치를 확인한 방법은 다음과 같습니다. 방법론 페이지.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is Drew Barrymore's net worth in 2026?
As of 2026, Drew Barrymore's net worth is an estimated $347.0 Million. The estimate is built film by film from disclosed salaries and documented backend, then year by year: income, minus representation fees and taxes, minus spending, compounded at real market returns.
How does Drew Barrymore make money?
영화 급여 및 문서화된 백엔드 참여.
How is Drew Barrymore's net worth calculated?
Disclosed paydays enter as reported, with citations. Undisclosed lead roles use the median of disclosed salaries for their era and budget band, capped at 15% of the film's budget, and supporting or early-career roles use the documented pre-stardom fraction of that median. We subtract sourced representation fees, taxes for the years Drew actually worked, and spending from measured savings behavior, then compound at real market returns. Undocumented backend, endorsements, and producing credits enter as estimated lines from disclosed medians. Every rate and source is published.
How much does Drew Barrymore make per film?
역할과 시대에 따라 다르며 위의 영화별 표에는 모든 타이틀에 대해 계산된 급여가 나열되어 있습니다. 공개된 급여일은 보고된 대로 입력됩니다. 공개되지 않은 역할은 같은 시대와 예산 범위에서 비슷한 배우가 얻은 것을 모델로 하며, 획기적인 이후의 주연은 가장 많은 수익을 올리고 조연 또는 초기 역할은 그 중 문서화된 부분을 차지합니다.
세율이 왜 이렇게 높은데, 배우들은 대출회사를 통해서 피하지 않는 걸까요?
Tax comes out at the effective rate for where Drew lived each year, which is the rate shown in the year-by-year table. In a high-tax state like California, combined federal and state income tax reaches close to half of a top earner's income, so those years run in the mid-40s percent. A loan-out company, the corporation many actors run their income through, does not lower the tax on the money they take home. Its real advantage is deducting business costs such as agent, manager, and attorney fees, and the model already subtracts those as a separate line before any tax is applied. High-earning performers also fall outside the pass-through business deduction that other company owners can claim, so it buys them no rate cut.
이 수치가 다른 순자산 사이트와 다른 이유는 무엇입니까?
Most sites publish a single number with no way to check it. This estimate is built in the open: every salary, rate, and assumption is on the page, and the 방법론 페이지 lists every source.
이 추정치는 얼마나 정확합니까?
개인의 순자산 추정치는 정확하지 않습니다. 이것은 공개 데이터로 구축된 모델입니다. 차이점은 어떻게 제작되었는지 볼 수 있고 모든 단계를 확인할 수 있다는 점입니다. 계산 상단 근처의 신뢰 등급은 수치 중 공개된 숫자에 얼마나 많은 영향을 미치는지 보여주며 페이지에는 숫자가 가정에 의존하는 위치가 표시됩니다.
Is Drew Barrymore rich compared to the average person?
Yes. A net worth of $347.0 Million is far above the median American household, which sits near $193,000 according to Federal Reserve data.
What is Drew Barrymore's biggest source of wealth?
On this page it is film salaries, the largest line in the calculation at $340.5 Million. The full breakdown, with every other line and its source, is above.
How much does Drew Barrymore make from endorsements?
The model counts $32.0 Million in career endorsement income for Drew: 2 named partnerships x the $4.0M annual fee from the median disclosed film deal x a 4-year term, spread across the deal years. It is an estimate, since the individual deal values are not all public, and it sits as its own line in the calculation above.
다른 배우 탐색
NetWorth Explained 소개
We originally created NWE because nobody in the public-figure net worth space showed their work. Magazines and sites threw out big numbers while hiding behind vague claims of “proprietary algorithms” 또는 “insider knowledge.” That’s why we started the world’s only publication that transparently showed every assumption, every variable, and every calculation. We’re still the only ones who do it this way. NetWorth Explained에 대해 자세히 알아보세요..