$74.3 Million

Florence Pugh 순자산 2026

최종 업데이트 August 3, 2026

As of 2026, Florence Pugh has an estimated net worth of $74.3 Million, computed film by film and year by year from public records and published rates. Every input, rate, and source behind the number is on this page.

Calculation

  • 공개된 급여 및 문서화된 백엔드(각각 인용 포함)
  • 시대, 예산 범위, 경력 단계에 따라 공개된 비교 대상을 모델로 한 비공개 역할
  • 공개된 중앙값에서 추정된 백엔드, 보증 및 생성 크레딧
Florence Pugh

Fast Facts

BirthdateJanuary 3, 1996
BirthplaceOxford
BreakthroughLittle Women (2019)
Best KnownMidsommar (2019)

Who Is Florence Pugh?

Florence Pugh was born January 3, 1996 in Oxford, best known for Midsommar (2019). The earnings behind Florence's net worth come from film salaries, backend participation, and endorsement deals.

The model tracks Florence's earning years from 2013 to 2026, with the biggest single year in 2021 at about $41.3 Million of gross income. After representation fees, taxes, and living costs, what stays invested compounds at market returns into an estimated $74.3 Million today.

Data

아래의 모든 라인은 공개 데이터와 당사에 게시된 요율표를 바탕으로 계산되었습니다. 방법론 페이지. 신뢰: C등급. 문서화된 숫자는 이 수치의 작은 부분만을 차지하므로 대부분은 게시된 요율 및 비교 항목(등급은 주로 문서화된 A부터 대부분 모델링된 C까지)을 기준으로 모델링됩니다.

The Calculation

Florence Pugh net worth line items
LineAmount
Revenue
Film pay, modeled lead roles (21 of 38 films)
era and budget-band medians of disclosed lead salaries (winsorized, thin cells shrunk toward the era median), blended with this actor's disclosed quote history when available; soft breakthrough blend near the career break year
$186,187,331
Film pay, modeled post-breakthrough supporting roles (6 of 38 films)
12.0% of lead cells: lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio
$16,187,760
Film pay, modeled supporting and early roles (11 of 38 films)
시대 중앙값의 2.5%: 스타덤에 오르기 전 비율
$17,390,652
백엔드 포인트, 추정
12% of disclosed lead deals included points, at a median 2.6% of box office; expected value on 19 commercially viable undisclosed lead roles; cash spread over 3 years; 10 film(s) used band-specific box-office/budget multiples as a gross proxy
$15,529,187
추천 수, 추정(3개 브랜드 파트너십)
3 named partnerships x the $4.0M annual fee from the median disclosed film deal x a 4-year term, spread across the deal years
$48,000,000
잔차, 추정
SAG residual rates on post-theatrical receipts assumed at half of box office, split by role share and spread over the ten years after each release; 21 film(s) used band-specific box-office proxies
$37,156,510
TV: Studio City
Cat; guest default per credited year; network not identified, priced on the broadcast cell; priced from tv_episode_rates.csv (en.wikipedia.org)
$30,000
TV: Marcella
Cara Thomas; stated episode count; streaming network family; priced from tv_episode_rates.csv (en.wikipedia.org)
$225,000
TV: King Lear
Cordelia; one engagement for a television film or special; network not identified, priced on the broadcast cell; priced from tv_episode_rates.csv (en.wikipedia.org)
$75,000
TV: The Little Drummer Girl
Charmian "Charlie" Ross; stated episode count; broadcast network family; priced from tv_episode_rates.csv (en.wikipedia.org)
$1,500,000
TV: Acting for a Cause
Jessica Goldman; guest default per credited year; animation format tier; priced from tv_episode_rates.csv (en.wikipedia.org)
$24,000
TV: Marvel Studios: Assembled
Herself; stated episode count; network not identified, priced on the broadcast cell; priced from tv_episode_rates.csv (en.wikipedia.org)
$30,000
TV: Hawkeye
Yelena Belova / Black Widow; stated episode count; network not identified, priced on the broadcast cell; priced from tv_episode_rates.csv (en.wikipedia.org)
$225,000
TV: Running Wild with Bear Grylls
Herself; guest default per credited year; animation format tier; priced from tv_episode_rates.csv (en.wikipedia.org)
$24,000
TV: Human Resources
Sarah Crumbhorn; stated episode count; streaming network family; priced from tv_episode_rates.csv (en.wikipedia.org)
$300,000
TV: No Taste Like Home with Antoni Porowski
Herself; guest default per credited year; network not identified, priced on the broadcast cell; priced from tv_episode_rates.csv (en.wikipedia.org)
$30,000
TV: Marvel Zombies
Yelena Belova / Black Widow; stated episode count; network not identified, priced on the broadcast cell; priced from tv_episode_rates.csv (en.wikipedia.org)
$30,000
저축에 대한 투자 수익
mixed portfolio: 55% actual 60/40 securities returns (taxed) + 45% US long-run home-price rate on the rest
$12,374,791
Expenses
대리 수수료
대리인 10% + 변호사 5%
-$44,364,006
Taxes
US-CA 유효 요율, 연도별
-$113,264,553
개인 지출
measured household savings rates by income, times a 88% entertainment-household factor
-$76,195,189
추정 순자산$74,311,085

영화별 영화

Florence Pugh film-by-film pay
FilmYearRoleBudget매표소계산된 급여
어벤져스: 둠스데이
no disclosed fee: modeled on the $23.8M shrunk median for 2020s/large (n=2), capped at $10.5M
2026Lead$70,000,000$10,407,714
Dune: Part Three
no disclosed fee: modeled on the $23.8M shrunk median for 2020s/large (n=2), capped at $10.5M
2026Lead$70,000,000$10,407,714
East of Eden
no disclosed fee: modeled on the $23.8M shrunk median for 2020s/large (n=2), capped at $10.5M
2026Lead$70,000,000$5,000,000$10,407,714
Spider-Man: Brand New Day
no disclosed fee: modeled on the $18.0M shrunk median for 2020s/blockbuster (n=8)
2026Lead$225,000,000$17,836,505
Marvel Zombies
no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $23.8M shrunk median for 2020s/large (n=2) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio)
2025Supporting$70,000,000$2,809,419
No Taste Like Home with Antoni Porowski
no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $23.8M shrunk median for 2020s/large (n=2) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio)
2025Supporting$70,000,000$2,809,419
Thunderbolts*
no disclosed fee: modeled on the $16.4M shrunk median for 2020s/tentpole (n=5)
2025Lead$180,000,000$382,400,000$16,140,471
듄: 2부
no disclosed fee: modeled on the $16.4M shrunk median for 2020s/tentpole (n=5)
2024Lead$190,000,000$715,000,000$15,876,833
Rachel Chinouriri
no disclosed fee: modeled on the $23.8M shrunk median for 2020s/large (n=2), capped at $10.5M
2024Lead$70,000,000$10,158,777
We Live in Time
no disclosed fee: modeled on the $21.7M shrunk median for 2020s/mid (n=1), capped at $3.0M
2024Lead$20,000,000$58,700,000$2,915,322
A Good Person
no disclosed fee: modeled on the $23.8M shrunk median for 2020s/large (n=2), capped at $10.5M
2023Lead$70,000,000$3,100,000$9,856,399
Human Resources
no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $23.8M shrunk median for 2020s/large (n=2) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio)
2023Supporting$70,000,000$2,703,413
Oppenheimer
no disclosed fee: modeled on the $16.4M shrunk median for 2020s/tentpole (n=5), capped at $15.0M
2023Lead$100,000,000$955,300,000$14,052,146
The Boy and the Heron
no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $23.8M shrunk median for 2020s/large (n=2) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio)
2023Supporting$70,000,000$294,200,000$2,703,413
Toby Sebastian
no disclosed fee: modeled on the $23.8M shrunk median for 2020s/large (n=2), capped at $10.5M
2023Lead$70,000,000$9,856,399
Don't Worry Darling
no disclosed fee: modeled on the $21.7M shrunk median for 2020s/mid (n=1), capped at $3.0M
2022Lead$20,000,000$87,609,403$2,706,959
Puss in Boots: The Last Wish
no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $23.8M shrunk median for 2020s/large (n=2) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio)
2022Supporting$90,000,000$484,300,000$2,581,048
Bear Grylls와 함께 야생 달리기
no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $23.8M shrunk median for 2020s/large (n=2) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio)
2022Supporting$70,000,000$2,581,048
The Wonder
no disclosed fee: modeled on the $23.8M shrunk median for 2020s/large (n=2), capped at $10.5M
2022Lead$70,000,000$9,319,146
Black Widow
soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.79): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $18.0M shrunk median for 2020s/blockbuster (n=8) vs early terms
2021Lead$200,000,000$379,751,655$14,338,920
Hawkeye
soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.79): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $23.8M shrunk median for 2020s/large (n=2), capped at $10.5M vs early terms
2021Lead$70,000,000$8,433,472
Toby Sebastian
soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.79): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $23.8M shrunk median for 2020s/large (n=2), capped at $10.5M vs early terms
2021Lead$70,000,000$8,433,472
Father of the Bride Part 3(ish)
soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.66): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $23.8M shrunk median for 2020s/large (n=2), capped at $10.5M vs early terms
2020Lead$70,000,000$7,139,368
Fighting with My Family
soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.50): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $5.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid), capped at $1.6M vs early terms
2019Lead$11,000,000$41,500,000$887,500
In the Time It Takes to Get There
soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.50): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3), capped at $6.0M vs early terms
2019Lead$40,000,000$3,137,500
Little Women
soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.50): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3), capped at $6.0M vs early terms
2019Lead$40,000,000$220,100,000$3,137,500
Midsommar
soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.50): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $5.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid), capped at $1.4M vs early terms
2019Lead$9,000,000$48,500,000$737,500
King Lear
soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.34): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3), capped at $6.0M vs early terms
2018Lead$40,000,000$2,217,170
Leading Lady Parts
soft-breakthrough supporting blend (w=0.34)
2018Supporting$40,000,000$629,510
Malevolent
soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.34): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3), capped at $6.0M vs early terms
2018Lead$40,000,000$2,217,170
Outlaw King
soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.34): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $20.0M shrunk median for 2010s/tentpole (n=12), capped at $18.0M vs early terms
2018Lead$120,000,000$6,436,764
The Commuter
soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.34): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3), capped at $4.5M vs early terms
2018Lead$30,000,000$119,900,000$1,708,304
The Little Drummer Girl
soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.34): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $5.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid), capped at $2.2M vs early terms
2018Lead$15,000,000$7,828,841$845,893
Lady Macbeth
no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3) (pre-stardom rate); soft-breakthrough weight 0.12
2016Lead$40,000,000$6,400,000$957,437
Marcella
no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3) (pre-stardom rate); soft-breakthrough weight 0.12
2016Lead$40,000,000$957,437
Paradise Lost?
no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3) (pre-stardom rate); soft-breakthrough weight 0.06
2015Lead$40,000,000$646,948
Studio City
no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3) (pre-stardom rate); soft-breakthrough weight 0.06
2015Lead$40,000,000$646,948
The Falling
no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $5.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid) (pre-stardom rate); soft-breakthrough weight 0.03
2014Lead$1,234,101$663,738$127,071

모델링된 수치의 작동 방식. An undisclosed lead role after the breakthrough gets the median of disclosed lead salaries for its era and budget band, capped at 15% of the film’s budget. Supporting and pre-breakthrough roles get 2.5% of that median, the documented going rate for actors before stardom. Films with no reported budget are treated as small productions. Undocumented backend, endorsements, and producer or director credits enter as separate estimated lines in the calculation above, built from disclosed medians. Every median comes from the published tables on our 방법론 페이지.

순자산 Over Time

$20M$40M$60M20132016201920222026$74.3 Million2013: $1,6622014: $47,1602015: $353,7222016: $705,4722017: $1,637,6932018: $4,566,2082019: $9,366,1472020: $15,863,5452021: $25,862,0162022: $32,099,1902023: $43,347,3442024: $53,375,5932025: $64,646,4782026: $74,311,085

아래의 연도별 표와 일치하는 매년 말의 모델링된 잔액입니다.

해마다

Florence Pugh year by year model
YearIncome담당자 수수료세율SpentSavedBalance
2026$39,823,440$5,973,51645%$10,261,943$8,355,515$74,311,085
2025$35,188,087$5,278,21345%$9,067,477$7,382,953$64,646,478
2024$31,275,533$4,691,33045%$8,059,267$6,562,045$53,375,593
2023$39,915,865$5,987,38045%$10,285,760$8,374,907$43,347,344
2022$38,125,589$5,718,83845%$9,824,431$7,999,282$32,099,190
2021$41,287,923$6,193,18845%$10,639,320$8,662,784$25,862,016
2020$27,650,468$4,147,57045%$7,125,138$5,801,455$15,863,545
2019$20,561,236$3,084,18545%$5,298,343$4,314,035$9,366,147
2018$13,912,089$2,086,81345%$3,584,951$2,918,951$4,566,208
2017$4,345,165$651,77547%$1,078,972$878,525$1,637,693
2016$1,648,823$247,32347%$409,429$333,366$705,472
2015$1,510,584$226,58847%$375,102$305,417$353,722
2014$477,119$71,56847%$169,546$45,396$47,160
2013$38,121$5,71847%$15,511$1,662$1,662

Model Notes

  • 거주지 프록시: 이 배치에 대해 개별적으로 공급되지 않은 거주지입니다. 문서화될 때까지 US-CA 기본값 적용
  • salary comps: 2 disclosed lead fee(s) flagged as non-market outliers (scale / far-below-quote) and excluded from era medians
  • 이미지 출처: Wikimedia Commons via Wikipedia (Florence Pugh)
이 번호를 재현하세요. 순자산 추정치는 과학적 발견과 마찬가지로 재현 가능해야 합니다. 즉, 동일한 공개 입력 및 동일한 게시 비율이 항상 동일한 답변을 제공해야 합니다. 영화 예산과 흥행은 공개 보고입니다. 공개된 모든 급여, 수수료율, 세율, 저축률 및 벤치마크 수익률은 인용과 함께 게시됩니다. 방법론 페이지. Undisclosed lead roles use the median of disclosed salaries for their era and budget band, capped at 15% of the film’s budget. Supporting and early-career roles use the documented pre-stardom fraction of that median. Undocumented backend, endorsements, and hyphenate credits enter as estimated lines from disclosed medians. Apply the rates year by year as shown above and you will land on $74.3 Million.

방법론

We rebuild Florence’s career as a yearly time series. Disclosed salaries and documented backend enter as reported, with citations. Undisclosed lead roles get the median of disclosed salaries for their era and budget band, capped at 15% of the film’s budget. Supporting roles and roles from before the breakthrough get 2.5% of that median, the going-rate ratio measured from disclosed pre-stardom deals. Films with no reported budget are treated as small productions, and every role is estimated unless a source documents it was unpaid. Representation fees come out at sourced rates, taxes follow the eras actually lived through, spending follows measured household savings behavior unless court documents say otherwise, and what remains compounds at real market returns. Undocumented backend enters as an expected value from disclosed deals, endorsements at the median disclosed ambassador fee, and producer or director credits at union-scale floors.

전체 모델, 모든 요율표 및 실제 거래와 비교하여 추정치를 확인한 방법은 다음과 같습니다. 방법론 페이지.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Florence Pugh's net worth in 2026?

As of 2026, Florence Pugh's net worth is an estimated $74.3 Million. The estimate is built film by film from disclosed salaries and documented backend, then year by year: income, minus representation fees and taxes, minus spending, compounded at real market returns.

How does Florence Pugh make money?

영화 급여 및 문서화된 백엔드 참여.

How is Florence Pugh's net worth calculated?

Disclosed paydays enter as reported, with citations. Undisclosed lead roles use the median of disclosed salaries for their era and budget band, capped at 15% of the film's budget, and supporting or early-career roles use the documented pre-stardom fraction of that median. We subtract sourced representation fees, taxes for the years Florence actually worked, and spending from measured savings behavior, then compound at real market returns. Undocumented backend, endorsements, and producing credits enter as estimated lines from disclosed medians. Every rate and source is published.

How much does Florence Pugh make per film?

역할과 시대에 따라 다르며 위의 영화별 표에는 모든 타이틀에 대해 계산된 급여가 나열되어 있습니다. 공개된 급여일은 보고된 대로 입력됩니다. 공개되지 않은 역할은 같은 시대와 예산 범위에서 비슷한 배우가 얻은 것을 모델로 하며, 획기적인 이후의 주연은 가장 많은 수익을 올리고 조연 또는 초기 역할은 그 중 문서화된 부분을 차지합니다.

세율이 왜 이렇게 높은데, 배우들은 대출회사를 통해서 피하지 않는 걸까요?

Tax comes out at the effective rate for where Florence lived each year, which is the rate shown in the year-by-year table. In a high-tax state like California, combined federal and state income tax reaches close to half of a top earner's income, so those years run in the mid-40s percent. A loan-out company, the corporation many actors run their income through, does not lower the tax on the money they take home. Its real advantage is deducting business costs such as agent, manager, and attorney fees, and the model already subtracts those as a separate line before any tax is applied. High-earning performers also fall outside the pass-through business deduction that other company owners can claim, so it buys them no rate cut.

이 수치가 다른 순자산 사이트와 다른 이유는 무엇입니까?

Most sites publish a single number with no way to check it. This estimate is built in the open: every salary, rate, and assumption is on the page, and the 방법론 페이지 lists every source.

이 추정치는 얼마나 정확합니까?

개인의 순자산 추정치는 정확하지 않습니다. 이것은 공개 데이터로 구축된 모델입니다. 차이점은 어떻게 제작되었는지 볼 수 있고 모든 단계를 확인할 수 있다는 점입니다. 계산 상단 근처의 신뢰 등급은 수치 중 공개된 숫자에 얼마나 많은 영향을 미치는지 보여주며 페이지에는 숫자가 가정에 의존하는 위치가 표시됩니다.

Is Florence Pugh rich compared to the average person?

Yes. A net worth of $74.3 Million is far above the median American household, which sits near $193,000 according to Federal Reserve data.

What is Florence Pugh's biggest source of wealth?

On this page it is film salaries, the largest line in the calculation at $186.2 Million. The full breakdown, with every other line and its source, is above.

How much does Florence Pugh make from endorsements?

The model counts $48.0 Million in career endorsement income for Florence: 3 named partnerships x the $4.0M annual fee from the median disclosed film deal x a 4-year term, spread across the deal years. It is an estimate, since the individual deal values are not all public, and it sits as its own line in the calculation above.

다른 배우 탐색

NetWorth Explained 소개

We originally created NWE because nobody in the public-figure net worth space showed their work. Magazines and sites threw out big numbers while hiding behind vague claims of “proprietary algorithms” 또는 “insider knowledge.” That’s why we started the world’s only publication that transparently showed every assumption, every variable, and every calculation. We’re still the only ones who do it this way. NetWorth Explained에 대해 자세히 알아보세요..