$329.0 Million
Meryl Streep 순자산 2026
최종 업데이트 August 3, 2026
As of 2026, Meryl Streep has an estimated net worth of $329.0 Million, computed film by film and year by year from public records and published rates. Every input, rate, and source behind the number is on this page.
Calculation
- 공개된 급여 및 문서화된 백엔드(각각 인용 포함)
- 시대, 예산 범위, 경력 단계에 따라 공개된 비교 대상을 모델로 한 비공개 역할
- 공개된 중앙값에서 추정된 백엔드, 보증 및 생성 크레딧
Fast Facts
| Birthdate | June 22, 1949 |
|---|---|
| Birthplace | Summit |
| Breakthrough | Alice (Alice's Adventures in Wonderland) (1979) |
| Best Known | The Devil Wears Prada (2006) |
Who Is Meryl Streep?
Meryl Streep was born June 22, 1949 in Summit, best known for The Devil Wears Prada (2006). The earnings behind Meryl's net worth come from film salaries, backend participation, and endorsement deals.
The model tracks Meryl's earning years from 1973 to 2026, with the biggest single year in 2018 at about $28.7 Million of gross income. After representation fees, taxes, and living costs, what stays invested compounds at market returns into an estimated $329.0 Million today.
Data
아래의 모든 라인은 공개 데이터와 당사에 게시된 요율표를 바탕으로 계산되었습니다. 방법론 페이지. 신뢰: C등급. 문서화된 숫자는 이 수치의 작은 부분만을 차지하므로 대부분은 게시된 요율 및 비교 항목(등급은 주로 문서화된 A부터 대부분 모델링된 C까지)을 기준으로 모델링됩니다.
The Calculation
| Line | Amount |
|---|---|
| Revenue | |
| Film pay, modeled lead roles (68 of 122 films) era and budget-band medians of disclosed lead salaries (winsorized, thin cells shrunk toward the era median), blended with this actor's disclosed quote history when available; soft breakthrough blend near the career break year | $352,497,882 |
| Film pay, modeled post-breakthrough supporting roles (35 of 122 films) 12.0% of lead cells: lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio | $66,448,186 |
| Film pay, modeled supporting and early roles (19 of 122 films) 시대 중앙값의 2.5%: 스타덤에 오르기 전 비율 | $2,699,063 |
| 백엔드 포인트, 추정 12% of disclosed lead deals included points, at a median 2.6% of box office; expected value on 50 commercially viable undisclosed lead roles; cash spread over 3 years; 15 film(s) used band-specific box-office/budget multiples as a gross proxy | $19,069,529 |
| 추천 수, 추정(브랜드 파트너십 1개) 1 named partnerships x the $4.0M annual fee from the median disclosed film deal x a 4-year term, spread across the deal years | $16,000,000 |
| 잔차, 추정 SAG residual rates on post-theatrical receipts assumed at half of box office, split by role share and spread over the ten years after each release; 55 film(s) used band-specific box-office proxies | $44,913,791 |
| TV: Everybody Rides the Carousel Lover; one engagement for a television film or special; animation format tier; priced from tv_episode_rates.csv (en.wikipedia.org) | $75,000 |
| TV: Great Performances Edith Varney; guest default per credited year; broadcast network family; priced from tv_episode_rates.csv (en.wikipedia.org) | $450,000 |
| TV: Holocaust Inga Helms Weiss; stated episode count; network not identified, priced on the broadcast cell; priced from tv_episode_rates.csv (en.wikipedia.org) | $300,000 |
| TV: Kiss Me, Petruchio Katherine; guest default per credited year; network not identified, priced on the broadcast cell; priced from tv_episode_rates.csv (en.wikipedia.org) | $150,000 |
| TV: Alice at the Palace Alice; one engagement for a television film or special; network not identified, priced on the broadcast cell; priced from tv_episode_rates.csv (en.wikipedia.org) | $75,000 |
| TV: ...First Do No Harm Lori Reimuller; one engagement for a television film or special; network not identified, priced on the broadcast cell; priced from tv_episode_rates.csv (en.wikipedia.org) | $75,000 |
| TV: King of the Hill Aunt Esme Dauterive; guest default per credited year; animation format tier; priced from tv_episode_rates.csv (en.wikipedia.org) | $150,000 |
| TV: Angels in America Hannah Pitt / Ethel Rosenberg / The Rabbi / The Angel Australia; stated episode count; cable network family; priced from tv_episode_rates.csv (en.wikipedia.org) | $450,000 |
| TV: Freedom: A History of US Abigail Adams / Mary Eastey / Mother Jones / Margaret Chase Smith; stated episode count; network not identified, priced on the broadcast cell; priced from tv_episode_rates.csv (en.wikipedia.org) | $300,000 |
| TV: Ocean Voyagers Narrator; guest default per credited year; network not identified, priced on the broadcast cell; priced from tv_episode_rates.csv (en.wikipedia.org) | $30,000 |
| TV: Web Therapy Camilla Bowner; stated episode count; cable network family; priced from tv_episode_rates.csv (en.wikipedia.org) | $75,150 |
| TV: Makers: Women Who Make America Narrator; stated episode count; network not identified, priced on the broadcast cell; priced from tv_episode_rates.csv (en.wikipedia.org) | $45,000 |
| TV: Five Came Back Narrator; stated episode count; streaming network family; priced from tv_episode_rates.csv (en.wikipedia.org) | $45,000 |
| TV: Big Little Lies Mary Louise Wright; stated episode count; cable network family; priced from tv_episode_rates.csv (en.wikipedia.org) | $2,450,000 |
| TV: Extrapolations Eve Shearer; guest default per credited year; streaming network family; priced from tv_episode_rates.csv (en.wikipedia.org) | $30,000 |
| TV: Only Murders in the Building Loretta Durkin; stated episode count; streaming network family; priced from tv_episode_rates.csv (en.wikipedia.org) | $165,150 |
| TV: Corridors of Power: Should America Police the World? Narrator; stated episode count; network not identified, priced on the broadcast cell; priced from tv_episode_rates.csv (en.wikipedia.org) | $120,000 |
| TV: Saturday Night Live 50th Anniversary Special Herself / Colleen Rafferty Sr.; guest default per credited year; variety format tier; priced from tv_episode_rates.csv (en.wikipedia.org) | $30,000 |
| TV: The American Revolution Mercy Otis Warren; stated episode count; broadcast network family; priced from tv_episode_rates.csv (en.wikipedia.org) | $750,000 |
| TV: Henry David Thoreau Lidian Emerson / Margaret Fuller / Mary Merrick Brooks / Maria Thoreau; guest default per credited year; cable network family; priced from tv_episode_rates.csv (en.wikipedia.org) | $30,000 |
| 저축에 대한 투자 수익 mixed portfolio: 55% actual 60/40 securities returns (taxed) + 45% US long-run home-price rate on the rest | $225,048,677 |
| Expenses | |
| 대리 수수료 대리인 10% + 변호사 5% | -$74,515,732 |
| Taxes US-CA 유효 요율, 연도별 | -$190,548,766 |
| 개인 지출 measured household savings rates by income, times a 88% entertainment-household factor | -$127,748,741 |
| 추정 순자산 | $329,006,982 |
영화별 영화
| Film | Year | Role | Budget | 매표소 | 계산된 급여 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hoppers no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $16.4M shrunk median for 2020s/tentpole (n=5) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio) | 2026 | Supporting | $150,000,000 | $389,400,000 | $1,971,429 |
| Lidian Emerson no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $23.8M shrunk median for 2020s/large (n=2) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio) | 2026 | Supporting | $70,000,000 | – | $2,850,000 |
| Project Hail Mary no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $18.0M shrunk median for 2020s/blockbuster (n=8) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio) | 2026 | Supporting | $200,000,000 | $684,300,000 | $2,160,000 |
| The Devil Wears Prada 2 no disclosed fee: modeled on the $16.4M shrunk median for 2020s/tentpole (n=5), capped at $15.0M | 2026 | Lead | $100,000,000 | $690,900,000 | $15,000,000 |
| The American Revolution no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $23.8M shrunk median for 2020s/large (n=2) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio) | 2025 | Supporting | $70,000,000 | – | $2,850,000 |
| Corridors of Power: Should America Police the World? no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $23.8M shrunk median for 2020s/large (n=2) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio) | 2024 | Supporting | $70,000,000 | – | $2,850,000 |
| Schindler Space Architect no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $23.8M shrunk median for 2020s/large (n=2) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio) | 2024 | Supporting | $70,000,000 | – | $2,850,000 |
| Extrapolations no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $23.8M shrunk median for 2020s/large (n=2) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio) | 2023 | Supporting | $70,000,000 | – | $2,850,000 |
| 건물 안의 살인만 no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $23.8M shrunk median for 2020s/large (n=2) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio) | 2023 | Supporting | $70,000,000 | – | $2,850,000 |
| Sell/Buy/Date no disclosed fee: modeled on the $23.8M shrunk median for 2020s/large (n=2), capped at $10.5M | 2022 | Lead | $70,000,000 | – | $10,500,000 |
| Don't Look Up no disclosed fee: modeled on the $23.8M shrunk median for 2020s/large (n=2), capped at $11.2M | 2021 | Lead | $75,000,000 | $1,172,913 | $11,250,000 |
| Here We Are: Notes for Living on Planet Earth no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $23.8M shrunk median for 2020s/large (n=2) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio) | 2020 | Supporting | $70,000,000 | – | $2,850,000 |
| Let Them All Talk no disclosed fee: modeled on the $23.8M shrunk median for 2020s/large (n=2), capped at $10.5M | 2020 | Lead | $70,000,000 | – | $10,500,000 |
| The Prom (film) no disclosed fee: modeled on the $23.8M shrunk median for 2020s/large (n=2), capped at $10.5M | 2020 | Lead | $70,000,000 | $187,430 | $10,500,000 |
| Big Little Lies no disclosed fee: modeled on the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3), capped at $6.0M | 2019 | Lead | $40,000,000 | – | $6,000,000 |
| Little Women no disclosed fee: modeled on the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3), capped at $6.0M | 2019 | Lead | $40,000,000 | $220,100,000 | $6,000,000 |
| The Laundromat (2019 film) no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio) | 2019 | Supporting | $40,000,000 | – | $1,320,000 |
| Mamma Mia! Here We Go Again no disclosed fee: modeled on the $20.0M shrunk median for 2010s/large (n=8), capped at $11.2M | 2018 | Lead | $75,000,000 | $394,700,000 | $11,250,000 |
| Mary Poppins Returns no disclosed fee: modeled on the $20.0M shrunk median for 2010s/tentpole (n=12), capped at $19.5M | 2018 | Lead | $130,000,000 | $346,800,000 | $19,500,000 |
| This Changes Everything no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio) | 2018 | Supporting | $40,000,000 | – | $1,320,000 |
| Five Came Back no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio) | 2017 | Supporting | $40,000,000 | $721,000 | $1,320,000 |
| Little Door Gods no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $5.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio) | 2017 | Supporting | $12,000,000 | $11,900,000 | $600,000 |
| The Post (film) no disclosed fee: modeled on the $20.0M shrunk median for 2010s/large (n=8), capped at $7.5M | 2017 | Lead | $50,000,000 | $179,800,000 | $7,500,000 |
| We Rise no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio) | 2017 | Supporting | $40,000,000 | – | $1,320,000 |
| Florence Foster Jenkins no disclosed fee: modeled on the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3), capped at $4.3M | 2016 | Lead | $29,000,000 | $56,000,000 | $4,350,000 |
| Ricki and the Flash no disclosed fee: modeled on the $5.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid), capped at $2.7M | 2015 | Lead | $18,000,000 | $41,300,000 | $2,700,000 |
| Shout Gladi Gladi no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio) | 2015 | Supporting | $40,000,000 | – | $1,320,000 |
| Suffragette no disclosed fee: modeled on the $5.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid), capped at $2.1M | 2015 | Lead | $14,000,000 | $38,000,000 | $2,100,000 |
| Into the Woods no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $20.0M shrunk median for 2010s/large (n=8) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio) | 2014 | Supporting | $50,000,000 | $212,900,000 | $2,400,000 |
| The Giver (film) no disclosed fee: modeled on the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3), capped at $3.8M | 2014 | Lead | $25,000,000 | $67,000,000 | $3,750,000 |
| The Homesman no disclosed fee: modeled on the $5.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid), capped at $2.4M | 2014 | Lead | $16,000,000 | $8,199,999 | $2,400,000 |
| A Fierce Green Fire no disclosed fee: modeled on the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3), capped at $6.0M | 2013 | Lead | $40,000,000 | – | $6,000,000 |
| August: Osage County no disclosed fee: modeled on the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3), capped at $5.5M | 2013 | Lead | $37,000,000 | $74,200,000 | $5,550,000 |
| Girl Rising no disclosed fee: modeled on the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3), capped at $6.0M | 2013 | Lead | $40,000,000 | $1,700,000 | $6,000,000 |
| Makers: Women Who Make America no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio) | 2013 | Supporting | $40,000,000 | – | $1,320,000 |
| Out of Print no disclosed fee: modeled on the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3), capped at $6.0M | 2013 | Lead | $40,000,000 | – | $6,000,000 |
| Wings of Life no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio) | 2013 | Supporting | $40,000,000 | – | $1,320,000 |
| Hope Springs no disclosed fee: modeled on the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3), capped at $4.5M | 2012 | Lead | $30,000,000 | $114,300,000 | $4,500,000 |
| To the Arctic 3D no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio) | 2012 | Supporting | $40,000,000 | $23,700,000 | $1,320,000 |
| The Iron Lady (film) no disclosed fee: modeled on the $5.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid), capped at $1.9M | 2011 | Lead | $13,000,000 | $115,900,000 | $1,950,000 |
| Higglety Pigglety Pop! or There Must Be More to Life no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio) | 2010 | Supporting | $40,000,000 | – | $1,320,000 |
| Fantastic Mr. Fox no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $19.4M shrunk median for 2000s/mid (n=2) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio) | 2009 | Supporting | $40,000,000 | $58,100,000 | $2,325,000 |
| It's Complicated no disclosed fee: modeled on the $20.0M shrunk median for 2000s/large (n=18), capped at $12.0M | 2009 | Lead | $80,000,000 | $219,000,000 | $12,000,000 |
| Julie & Julia no disclosed fee: modeled on the $19.4M shrunk median for 2000s/mid (n=2), capped at $6.0M | 2009 | Lead | $40,000,000 | $129,500,000 | $6,000,000 |
| Doubt no disclosed fee: modeled on the $19.4M shrunk median for 2000s/mid (n=2), capped at $3.0M | 2008 | Lead | $20,000,000 | $51,700,000 | $3,000,000 |
| Mamma Mia! no disclosed fee: modeled on the $20.0M shrunk median for 2000s/large (n=18), capped at $7.8M | 2008 | Lead | $52,000,000 | $706,400,000 | $7,800,000 |
| Dark Matter no disclosed fee: modeled on the $19.4M shrunk median for 2000s/mid (n=2), capped at $6.0M | 2007 | Lead | $40,000,000 | $69,379 | $6,000,000 |
| Evening no disclosed fee: modeled on the $19.4M shrunk median for 2000s/mid (n=2), capped at $6.0M | 2007 | Lead | $40,000,000 | $20,000,000 | $6,000,000 |
| Lions for Lambs no disclosed fee: modeled on the $19.4M shrunk median for 2000s/mid (n=2), capped at $5.2M | 2007 | Lead | $35,000,000 | $64,800,000 | $5,250,000 |
| Ocean Voyagers no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $19.4M shrunk median for 2000s/mid (n=2) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio) | 2007 | Supporting | $40,000,000 | – | $2,325,000 |
| Rendition no disclosed fee: modeled on the $19.4M shrunk median for 2000s/mid (n=2), capped at $4.1M | 2007 | Lead | $27,500,000 | $27,000,000 | $4,125,000 |
| A Prairie Home Companion (film) no disclosed fee: modeled on the $18.8M median for its era and nearest band (mid), capped at $1.5M | 2006 | Lead | $10,000,000 | $26,000,000 | $1,500,000 |
| Hurricane on the Bayou no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $19.4M shrunk median for 2000s/mid (n=2) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio) | 2006 | Supporting | $40,000,000 | – | $2,325,000 |
| Mother Courage and Her Children no disclosed fee: modeled on the $19.4M shrunk median for 2000s/mid (n=2), capped at $6.0M | 2006 | Lead | $40,000,000 | – | $6,000,000 |
| The Ant Bully (film) no disclosed fee: modeled on the $19.4M shrunk median for 2000s/mid (n=2), capped at $7.1M | 2006 | Lead | $47,500,000 | $55,200,000 | $7,125,000 |
| The Devil Wears Prada (film) no disclosed fee: modeled on the $19.4M shrunk median for 2000s/mid (n=2), capped at $5.7M | 2006 | Lead | $38,000,000 | $326,551,094 | $5,700,000 |
| The Music of Regret no disclosed fee: modeled on the $19.4M shrunk median for 2000s/mid (n=2), capped at $6.0M | 2006 | Lead | $40,000,000 | – | $6,000,000 |
| Prime no disclosed fee: modeled on the $19.4M shrunk median for 2000s/mid (n=2), capped at $3.3M | 2005 | Lead | $22,000,000 | $67,900,000 | $3,300,000 |
| Stolen Childhoods no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $19.4M shrunk median for 2000s/mid (n=2) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio) | 2005 | Supporting | $40,000,000 | – | $2,325,000 |
| Bridge and Tunnel no disclosed fee: modeled on the $19.4M shrunk median for 2000s/mid (n=2), capped at $6.0M | 2004 | Lead | $40,000,000 | – | $6,000,000 |
| Lemony Snicket's A Series of Unfortunate Events no disclosed fee: modeled on the $11.8M shrunk median for 2000s/tentpole (n=9) | 2004 | Lead | $141,000,000 | $211,500,000 | $11,818,181 |
| The Manchurian Candidate (2004 film) no disclosed fee: modeled on the $18.8M median for its era and nearest band (mid), capped at $0.3M | 2004 | Lead | $2,200,000 | $7,716,923 | $330,000 |
| Angels in America no disclosed fee: modeled on the $19.4M shrunk median for 2000s/mid (n=2), capped at $6.0M | 2003 | Lead | $40,000,000 | – | $5,999,999 |
| Freedom: A History of US no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $19.4M shrunk median for 2000s/mid (n=2) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio) | 2003 | Supporting | $40,000,000 | – | $2,325,000 |
| Stuck on You no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $20.0M shrunk median for 2000s/large (n=18) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio) | 2003 | Supporting | $55,000,000 | $65,800,000 | $2,400,000 |
| Adaptation. no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $18.8M median for its era and nearest band (mid) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio) | 2002 | Supporting | $19,000,000 | $32,799,999 | $2,250,000 |
| The Hours (film) no disclosed fee: modeled on the $19.4M shrunk median for 2000s/mid (n=2), capped at $3.8M | 2002 | Lead | $25,000,000 | $108,800,000 | $3,749,999 |
| A.I. Artificial Intelligence no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $20.0M shrunk median for 2000s/large (n=18) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio) | 2001 | Supporting | $95,000,000 | $235,900,000 | $2,399,999 |
| The Seagull no disclosed fee: modeled on the $19.4M shrunk median for 2000s/mid (n=2), capped at $6.0M | 2001 | Lead | $40,000,000 | – | $5,999,998 |
| Ginevra's Story no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $14.4M shrunk median for 1990s/mid (n=6) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio) | 1999 | Supporting | $26,000,000 | – | $1,724,998 |
| 언덕의 왕 no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $10.0M shrunk median for 1990s/small (n=1) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio) | 1999 | Supporting | $8,000,000 | – | $1,199,998 |
| Music of the Heart no disclosed fee: modeled on the $14.4M shrunk median for 1990s/mid (n=6), capped at $4.0M | 1999 | Lead | $27,000,000 | $15,000,000 | $4,049,994 |
| Dancing at Lughnasa no disclosed fee: modeled on the $14.4M shrunk median for 1990s/mid (n=6), capped at $3.9M | 1998 | Lead | $26,000,000 | $2,300,000 | $3,899,989 |
| One True Thing no disclosed fee: modeled on the $14.4M shrunk median for 1990s/mid (n=6), capped at $4.5M | 1998 | Lead | $30,000,000 | $26,600,000 | $4,499,987 |
| ...First Do No Harm no disclosed fee: modeled on the $14.4M shrunk median for 1990s/mid (n=6), capped at $3.9M | 1997 | Lead | $26,000,000 | – | $3,899,978 |
| Before and After no disclosed fee: modeled on the $14.4M shrunk median for 1990s/mid (n=6), capped at $5.2M | 1996 | Lead | $35,000,000 | $15,000,000 | $5,249,941 |
| Marvin's Room no disclosed fee: modeled on the $14.4M shrunk median for 1990s/mid (n=6), capped at $3.5M | 1996 | Lead | $23,000,000 | $30,000,000 | $3,449,963 |
| The Bridges of Madison County (film) no disclosed fee: modeled on the $14.4M shrunk median for 1990s/mid (n=6), capped at $3.3M | 1995 | Lead | $22,000,000 | $182,000,000 | $3,299,931 |
| The Living Sea no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $14.4M shrunk median for 1990s/mid (n=6) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio) | 1995 | Supporting | $26,000,000 | – | $1,724,968 |
| The River Wild no disclosed fee: modeled on the $14.4M shrunk median for 1990s/mid (n=6), capped at $6.8M | 1994 | Lead | $45,000,000 | $94,200,000 | $6,749,710 |
| The Simpsons no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $14.4M shrunk median for 1990s/mid (n=6) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio) | 1994 | Supporting | $26,000,000 | $536,400,000 | $1,724,938 |
| The House of the Spirits (film) no disclosed fee: modeled on the $14.4M shrunk median for 1990s/mid (n=6), capped at $6.0M | 1993 | Lead | $40,000,000 | $61,000,000 | $5,999,501 |
| Death Becomes Her no disclosed fee: modeled on the $14.6M shrunk median for 1990s/large (n=3), capped at $8.2M | 1992 | Lead | $55,000,000 | $149,022,650 | $8,248,642 |
| Age 7 in America no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $14.4M shrunk median for 1990s/mid (n=6) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio) | 1991 | Supporting | $26,000,000 | – | $1,724,542 |
| Defending Your Life no disclosed fee: modeled on the $14.4M shrunk median for 1990s/mid (n=6), capped at $3.0M | 1991 | Lead | $20,000,000 | $16,399,999 | $2,999,114 |
| Postcards from the Edge no disclosed fee: modeled on the $14.4M shrunk median for 1990s/mid (n=6), capped at $3.3M | 1990 | Lead | $22,000,000 | $63,400,000 | $3,298,080 |
| The Earth Day Special no disclosed fee: modeled on the $14.4M shrunk median for 1990s/mid (n=6), capped at $3.9M | 1990 | Lead | $26,000,000 | – | $3,897,688 |
| She-Devil no disclosed fee: modeled on the $4.1M shrunk median for pre1990/small (n=2), capped at $2.4M | 1989 | Lead | $16,000,000 | $15,400,000 | $2,397,081 |
| Evil Angels no disclosed fee: modeled on the $4.1M shrunk median for pre1990/small (n=2), capped at $2.2M | 1988 | Lead | $15,000,000 | $6,900,000 | $2,244,692 |
| Ironweed no disclosed fee: modeled on the $6.3M shrunk median for pre1990/mid (n=4), capped at $4.0M | 1987 | Lead | $27,000,000 | $7,300,000 | $4,031,302 |
| Heartburn no disclosed fee: modeled on the $6.3M shrunk median for pre1990/mid (n=4), capped at $3.0M | 1986 | Lead | $20,000,000 | $52,600,000 | $2,973,527 |
| Out of Africa no disclosed fee: modeled on the $6.3M shrunk median for pre1990/mid (n=4), capped at $4.7M | 1985 | Lead | $31,000,000 | $227,500,000 | $4,569,212 |
| Plenty no disclosed fee: modeled on the $4.1M shrunk median for pre1990/small (n=2), capped at $1.5M | 1985 | Lead | $10,000,000 | $6,100,000 | $1,474,876 |
| Falling in Love no disclosed fee: modeled on the $4.1M shrunk median for pre1990/small (n=2), capped at $1.8M | 1984 | Lead | $12,000,000 | $11,100,000 | $1,741,551 |
| Silkwood no disclosed fee: modeled on the $4.1M shrunk median for pre1990/small (n=2), capped at $1.5M | 1983 | Lead | $10,000,000 | $35,600,000 | $1,409,246 |
| Alice (Alice's Adventures in Wonderland) no disclosed fee: modeled on the $4.1M shrunk median for pre1990/small (n=2), capped at $2.1M | 1982 | Lead | $14,000,000 | – | $1,861,967 |
| Still of the Night no disclosed fee: modeled on the $4.1M shrunk median for pre1990/small (n=2), capped at $1.5M | 1982 | Lead | $10,000,000 | $5,979,947 | $1,333,488 |
| Katherina (Kate) Minola soft-breakthrough supporting blend (w=0.79) | 1981 | Supporting | $14,000,000 | – | $413,252 |
| The French Lieutenant's Woman (film) soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.79): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $4.1M shrunk median for pre1990/small (n=2), capped at $1.2M vs early terms | 1981 | Lead | $8,000,000 | $26,900,000 | $971,183 |
| Alice (Alice's Adventures in Wonderland) soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.50): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $2.8M median for its era and nearest band (small), capped at $0.5M vs early terms | 1979 | Lead | $3,025,000 | – | $261,250 |
| Kramer vs. Kramer soft-breakthrough supporting blend (w=0.50) | 1979 | Supporting | $8,000,000 | $173,000,000 | $299,062 |
| The Public Theater soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.50): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $2.8M median for its era and nearest band (small), capped at $0.5M vs early terms | 1979 | Lead | $3,025,000 | – | $261,250 |
| The Seduction of Joe Tynan soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.50): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $4.1M shrunk median for pre1990/small (n=2), capped at $0.8M vs early terms | 1979 | Lead | $5,000,000 | $19,500,000 | $426,562 |
| Holocaust soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.34): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $2.8M median for its era and nearest band (small), capped at $0.5M vs early terms | 1978 | Lead | $3,025,000 | – | $199,359 |
| The Deer Hunter soft-breakthrough supporting blend (w=0.34) | 1978 | Supporting | $15,000,000 | $49,000,000 | $236,066 |
| The Taming of the Shrew soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.34): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $2.8M median for its era and nearest band (small), capped at $0.5M vs early terms | 1978 | Lead | $3,025,000 | – | $199,359 |
| Great Performances soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.21): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $2.8M median for its era and nearest band (small), capped at $0.5M vs early terms | 1977 | Lead | $3,025,000 | – | $149,064 |
| Happy End soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.21): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $2.8M median for its era and nearest band (small), capped at $0.5M vs early terms | 1977 | Lead | $3,025,000 | – | $149,064 |
| Julia soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.21): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $4.1M shrunk median for pre1990/small (n=2), capped at $1.2M vs early terms | 1977 | Lead | $7,840,000 | $20,714,400 | $326,936 |
| The Cherry Orchard soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.21): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $2.8M median for its era and nearest band (small), capped at $0.5M vs early terms | 1977 | Lead | $3,025,000 | – | $149,064 |
| The Deadliest Season soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.21): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $2.8M median for its era and nearest band (small), capped at $0.5M vs early terms | 1977 | Lead | $3,025,000 | – | $149,064 |
| Uncommon Women and Others (film) soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.21): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $2.8M median for its era and nearest band (small), capped at $0.5M vs early terms | 1977 | Lead | $3,025,000 | – | $149,064 |
| 27 Wagons Full of Cotton no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $2.8M median for its era and nearest band (small) (pre-stardom rate); soft-breakthrough weight 0.12 | 1976 | Lead | $3,025,000 | – | $114,643 |
| Everybody Rides the Carousel no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $2.8M median for its era and nearest band (small) (pre-stardom rate) | 1976 | Supporting | $3,025,000 | – | $99,892 |
| Henry V no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $2.8M median for its era and nearest band (small) (pre-stardom rate); soft-breakthrough weight 0.12 | 1976 | Lead | $3,025,000 | – | $114,643 |
| Measure for Measure no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $2.8M median for its era and nearest band (small) (pre-stardom rate); soft-breakthrough weight 0.12 | 1976 | Lead | $3,025,000 | – | $114,643 |
| Secret Service no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $2.8M median for its era and nearest band (small) (pre-stardom rate); soft-breakthrough weight 0.12 | 1976 | Lead | $3,025,000 | – | $114,643 |
| The Shaft of Love no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $2.8M median for its era and nearest band (small) (pre-stardom rate); soft-breakthrough weight 0.06 | 1975 | Lead | $3,025,000 | – | $93,763 |
| Trelawny of the 'Wells' no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $2.8M median for its era and nearest band (small) (pre-stardom rate); soft-breakthrough weight 0.06 | 1975 | Lead | $3,025,000 | – | $93,763 |
| The Frogs (musical) no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $2.8M median for its era and nearest band (small) (pre-stardom rate); soft-breakthrough weight 0.03 | 1974 | Lead | $3,025,000 | – | $82,011 |
| The Idiots Karamazov no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $2.8M median for its era and nearest band (small) (pre-stardom rate); soft-breakthrough weight 0.03 | 1974 | Lead | $3,025,000 | – | $82,011 |
| The Possessed (novel) no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $2.8M median for its era and nearest band (small) (pre-stardom rate); soft-breakthrough weight 0.03 | 1974 | Lead | $3,025,000 | – | $82,011 |
모델링된 수치의 작동 방식. An undisclosed lead role after the breakthrough gets the median of disclosed lead salaries for its era and budget band, capped at 15% of the film’s budget. Supporting and pre-breakthrough roles get 2.5% of that median, the documented going rate for actors before stardom. Films with no reported budget are treated as small productions. Undocumented backend, endorsements, and producer or director credits enter as separate estimated lines in the calculation above, built from disclosed medians. Every median comes from the published tables on our 방법론 페이지.
순자산 Over Time
아래의 연도별 표와 일치하는 매년 말의 모델링된 잔액입니다.
해마다
| Year | Income | 담당자 수수료 | 세율 | Spent | Saved | Balance |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | $17,213,515 | $2,582,027 | 45% | $4,435,682 | $3,611,636 | $329,006,982 |
| 2025 | $10,551,306 | $1,582,696 | 45% | $2,718,924 | $2,213,812 | $318,936,874 |
| 2024 | $6,331,341 | $949,701 | 45% | $1,631,498 | $1,328,404 | $295,219,014 |
| 2023 | $7,201,688 | $1,080,253 | 45% | $1,855,774 | $1,511,015 | $272,130,132 |
| 2022 | $10,611,522 | $1,591,728 | 45% | $2,734,441 | $2,226,446 | $248,385,737 |
| 2021 | $12,788,724 | $1,918,309 | 45% | $3,295,475 | $2,683,253 | $264,157,675 |
| 2020 | $22,490,873 | $3,373,631 | 45% | $5,795,583 | $4,718,900 | $241,168,403 |
| 2019 | $21,414,496 | $3,212,174 | 45% | $5,518,216 | $4,493,061 | $220,095,525 |
| 2018 | $28,691,399 | $4,303,710 | 45% | $7,393,372 | $6,019,857 | $194,866,170 |
| 2017 | $18,712,119 | $2,806,818 | 47% | $4,646,511 | $3,783,299 | $187,749,854 |
| 2016 | $7,981,969 | $1,197,295 | 47% | $1,982,048 | $1,613,830 | $170,954,603 |
| 2015 | $7,458,476 | $1,118,771 | 47% | $1,852,056 | $1,507,988 | $160,974,295 |
| 2014 | $9,822,609 | $1,473,391 | 47% | $2,439,107 | $1,985,978 | $155,684,345 |
| 2013 | $22,907,355 | $3,436,103 | 47% | $5,688,254 | $4,631,510 | $144,853,606 |
| 2012 | $13,699,994 | $2,054,999 | 43% | $3,658,671 | $2,978,976 | $128,411,394 |
| 2011 | $5,125,747 | $768,862 | 43% | $1,368,864 | $1,114,561 | $117,580,399 |
| 2010 | $4,169,376 | $625,406 | 43% | $1,113,459 | $906,604 | $112,158,935 |
| 2009 | $17,126,383 | $2,568,957 | 43% | $4,573,710 | $3,724,022 | $104,138,987 |
| 2008 | $15,930,430 | $2,389,565 | 43% | $4,254,323 | $3,463,970 | $91,658,695 |
| 2007 | $21,378,698 | $3,206,805 | 43% | $5,709,318 | $4,648,661 | $96,949,241 |
| 2006 | $28,604,152 | $4,290,623 | 43% | $7,638,922 | $6,219,790 | $88,298,031 |
| 2005 | $13,548,241 | $2,032,236 | 43% | $3,618,144 | $2,945,978 | $76,961,007 |
| 2004 | $15,410,199 | $2,311,530 | 43% | $4,115,392 | $3,350,849 | $71,414,126 |
| 2003 | $14,472,291 | $2,170,844 | 43% | $3,864,918 | $3,146,907 | $64,556,412 |
| 2002 | $8,135,658 | $1,220,349 | 46% | $2,058,328 | $1,675,939 | $55,928,192 |
| 2001 | $8,227,875 | $1,234,181 | 46% | $2,081,659 | $1,694,936 | $55,937,655 |
| 2000 | $3,061,169 | $459,175 | 46% | $774,478 | $630,598 | $54,266,053 |
| 1999 | $5,612,416 | $841,862 | 46% | $1,419,946 | $1,156,153 | $52,801,456 |
| 1998 | $8,569,965 | $1,285,495 | 46% | $2,168,208 | $1,765,406 | $48,222,134 |
| 1997 | $6,085,641 | $912,846 | 46% | $1,539,672 | $1,253,637 | $42,030,592 |
| 1996 | $8,074,907 | $1,211,236 | 46% | $2,042,958 | $1,663,424 | $36,448,512 |
| 1995 | $6,998,143 | $1,049,721 | 46% | $1,770,536 | $1,441,612 | $32,241,686 |
| 1994 | $8,150,192 | $1,222,529 | 46% | $2,062,005 | $1,678,933 | $27,124,226 |
| 1993 | $7,341,247 | $1,101,187 | 46% | $1,857,341 | $1,512,291 | $24,991,448 |
| 1992 | $8,146,491 | $1,221,974 | 36% | $2,442,748 | $1,988,943 | $22,180,332 |
| 1991 | $6,203,597 | $930,540 | 36% | $1,860,166 | $1,514,591 | $19,243,814 |
| 1990 | $6,811,939 | $1,021,791 | 36% | $2,042,579 | $1,663,116 | $15,896,828 |
| 1989 | $4,114,425 | $617,164 | 36% | $1,233,722 | $1,004,525 | $13,861,233 |
| 1988 | $2,628,503 | $394,275 | 36% | $788,164 | $641,742 | $11,521,943 |
| 1987 | $4,082,897 | $612,434 | 45% | $1,052,105 | $856,649 | $10,161,176 |
| 1986 | $3,855,029 | $578,254 | 55% | $812,771 | $661,777 | $8,975,897 |
| 1985 | $5,534,668 | $830,200 | 55% | $1,166,896 | $950,114 | $7,649,433 |
| 1984 | $3,227,110 | $484,067 | 55% | $680,385 | $553,985 | $5,941,283 |
| 1983 | $1,710,055 | $256,508 | 55% | $360,538 | $293,558 | $5,091,689 |
| 1982 | $6,886,280 | $1,032,942 | 55% | $1,451,862 | $1,182,140 | $4,702,897 |
| 1981 | $6,221,017 | $933,153 | 55% | $1,311,602 | $1,067,937 | $3,450,877 |
| 1980 | $4,531,142 | $679,671 | 55% | $955,319 | $777,843 | $2,335,643 |
| 1979 | $5,099,310 | $764,896 | 55% | $1,075,108 | $875,378 | $1,526,881 |
| 1978 | $1,307,399 | $196,110 | 55% | $275,644 | $224,436 | $638,572 |
| 1977 | $1,108,087 | $166,213 | 55% | $233,623 | $190,221 | $405,916 |
| 1976 | $796,838 | $119,526 | 55% | $168,001 | $136,790 | $211,414 |
| 1975 | $304,349 | $45,652 | 55% | $78,509 | $37,904 | $73,143 |
| 1974 | $228,482 | $34,272 | 55% | $58,939 | $28,456 | $34,539 |
| 1973 | $73,810 | $11,072 | 55% | $22,270 | $5,963 | $5,963 |
Model Notes
- 거주지 프록시: 이 배치에 대해 개별적으로 공급되지 않은 거주지입니다. 문서화될 때까지 US-CA 기본값 적용
- salary comps: 2 disclosed lead fee(s) flagged as non-market outliers (scale / far-below-quote) and excluded from era medians
- 이미지 출처: Wikimedia Commons via Wikipedia (Meryl Streep)
이 번호를 재현하세요. 순자산 추정치는 과학적 발견과 마찬가지로 재현 가능해야 합니다. 즉, 동일한 공개 입력 및 동일한 게시 비율이 항상 동일한 답변을 제공해야 합니다. 영화 예산과 흥행은 공개 보고입니다. 공개된 모든 급여, 수수료율, 세율, 저축률 및 벤치마크 수익률은 인용과 함께 게시됩니다. 방법론 페이지. Undisclosed lead roles use the median of disclosed salaries for their era and budget band, capped at 15% of the film’s budget. Supporting and early-career roles use the documented pre-stardom fraction of that median. Undocumented backend, endorsements, and hyphenate credits enter as estimated lines from disclosed medians. Apply the rates year by year as shown above and you will land on $329.0 Million.
방법론
We rebuild Meryl’s career as a yearly time series. Disclosed salaries and documented backend enter as reported, with citations. Undisclosed lead roles get the median of disclosed salaries for their era and budget band, capped at 15% of the film’s budget. Supporting roles and roles from before the breakthrough get 2.5% of that median, the going-rate ratio measured from disclosed pre-stardom deals. Films with no reported budget are treated as small productions, and every role is estimated unless a source documents it was unpaid. Representation fees come out at sourced rates, taxes follow the eras actually lived through, spending follows measured household savings behavior unless court documents say otherwise, and what remains compounds at real market returns. Undocumented backend enters as an expected value from disclosed deals, endorsements at the median disclosed ambassador fee, and producer or director credits at union-scale floors.
전체 모델, 모든 요율표 및 실제 거래와 비교하여 추정치를 확인한 방법은 다음과 같습니다. 방법론 페이지.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is Meryl Streep's net worth in 2026?
As of 2026, Meryl Streep's net worth is an estimated $329.0 Million. The estimate is built film by film from disclosed salaries and documented backend, then year by year: income, minus representation fees and taxes, minus spending, compounded at real market returns.
How does Meryl Streep make money?
영화 급여 및 문서화된 백엔드 참여.
How is Meryl Streep's net worth calculated?
Disclosed paydays enter as reported, with citations. Undisclosed lead roles use the median of disclosed salaries for their era and budget band, capped at 15% of the film's budget, and supporting or early-career roles use the documented pre-stardom fraction of that median. We subtract sourced representation fees, taxes for the years Meryl actually worked, and spending from measured savings behavior, then compound at real market returns. Undocumented backend, endorsements, and producing credits enter as estimated lines from disclosed medians. Every rate and source is published.
How much does Meryl Streep make per film?
역할과 시대에 따라 다르며 위의 영화별 표에는 모든 타이틀에 대해 계산된 급여가 나열되어 있습니다. 공개된 급여일은 보고된 대로 입력됩니다. 공개되지 않은 역할은 같은 시대와 예산 범위에서 비슷한 배우가 얻은 것을 모델로 하며, 획기적인 이후의 주연은 가장 많은 수익을 올리고 조연 또는 초기 역할은 그 중 문서화된 부분을 차지합니다.
세율이 왜 이렇게 높은데, 배우들은 대출회사를 통해서 피하지 않는 걸까요?
Tax comes out at the effective rate for where Meryl lived each year, which is the rate shown in the year-by-year table. In a high-tax state like California, combined federal and state income tax reaches close to half of a top earner's income, so those years run in the mid-40s percent. A loan-out company, the corporation many actors run their income through, does not lower the tax on the money they take home. Its real advantage is deducting business costs such as agent, manager, and attorney fees, and the model already subtracts those as a separate line before any tax is applied. High-earning performers also fall outside the pass-through business deduction that other company owners can claim, so it buys them no rate cut.
이 수치가 다른 순자산 사이트와 다른 이유는 무엇입니까?
Most sites publish a single number with no way to check it. This estimate is built in the open: every salary, rate, and assumption is on the page, and the 방법론 페이지 lists every source.
이 추정치는 얼마나 정확합니까?
개인의 순자산 추정치는 정확하지 않습니다. 이것은 공개 데이터로 구축된 모델입니다. 차이점은 어떻게 제작되었는지 볼 수 있고 모든 단계를 확인할 수 있다는 점입니다. 계산 상단 근처의 신뢰 등급은 수치 중 공개된 숫자에 얼마나 많은 영향을 미치는지 보여주며 페이지에는 숫자가 가정에 의존하는 위치가 표시됩니다.
Is Meryl Streep rich compared to the average person?
Yes. A net worth of $329.0 Million is far above the median American household, which sits near $193,000 according to Federal Reserve data.
What is Meryl Streep's biggest source of wealth?
On this page it is film salaries, the largest line in the calculation at $352.5 Million. The full breakdown, with every other line and its source, is above.
How much does Meryl Streep make from endorsements?
The model counts $16.0 Million in career endorsement income for Meryl: 1 named partnerships x the $4.0M annual fee from the median disclosed film deal x a 4-year term, spread across the deal years. It is an estimate, since the individual deal values are not all public, and it sits as its own line in the calculation above.
다른 배우 탐색
Meryl Streep
Angelina Jolie
Bruce Willis
Christian Bale
Emma Watson
Hugh Jackman
Jason Statham
Jennifer Aniston
Jennifer Garner
Jodie Foster
Johnny Depp
Julia Roberts
Leonardo DiCaprio
Margot Robbie
Matt Damon
Mila Kunis
Morgan Freeman
Natalie Portman
Samuel L. Jackson
Sandra Bullock
Scarlett Johansson
Sylvester Stallone
Tom Hanks
NetWorth Explained 소개
We originally created NWE because nobody in the public-figure net worth space showed their work. Magazines and sites threw out big numbers while hiding behind vague claims of “proprietary algorithms” 또는 “insider knowledge.” That’s why we started the world’s only publication that transparently showed every assumption, every variable, and every calculation. We’re still the only ones who do it this way. NetWorth Explained에 대해 자세히 알아보세요..