Edward Norton Net Worth 2026
Huling na-update August 3, 2026
As of 2026, Edward Norton has an estimated net worth of $133.6 Million, computed film by film and year by year from public records and published rates. Every input, rate, and source behind the number is on this page.
Calculation
- Ibinunyag ang mga suweldo at dokumentadong backend, bawat isa ay may citation
- Ang mga hindi isiniwalat na tungkulin na na-modelo mula sa mga inihayag na maihahambing para sa kanilang panahon, banda ng badyet, at yugto ng karera
- Backend, pag-endorso, at paggawa ng mga kredito na tinantya mula sa mga isiniwalat na median
Fast Facts
| Birthdate | August 18, 1969 |
|---|---|
| Birthplace | Boston |
| Breakthrough | Primal Fear (1996) |
| Best Known | Fight Club (1999) |
Who Is Edward Norton?
Edward Norton was born August 18, 1969 in Boston, best known for Fight Club (1999). The earnings behind Edward's net worth come from film salaries, backend participation, and endorsement deals.
The model tracks Edward's earning years from 1995 to 2026, with the biggest single year in 2012 at about $18.7 Million of gross income. After representation fees, taxes, and living costs, what stays invested compounds at market returns into an estimated $133.6 Million today.
Data
Ang bawat linya sa ibaba ay kinukuwenta mula sa pampublikong data at sa mga na-publish na talahanayan ng rate sa aming pahina ng metodolohiya. Kumpiyansa: Baitang C. Ang mga dokumentadong numero ay sumasaklaw lamang sa isang maliit na bahagi ng figure na ito, kaya karamihan sa mga ito ay na-modelo mula sa mga nai-publish na mga rate at mga maihahambing (mga grado ay tumatakbo mula sa A, karamihan ay nakadokumento, hanggang C, karamihan ay naka-modelo).
The Calculation
| Line | Amount |
|---|---|
| Revenue | |
| Film pay, modeled lead roles (36 of 59 films) era and budget-band medians of disclosed lead salaries (winsorized, thin cells shrunk toward the era median), blended with this actor's disclosed quote history when available; soft breakthrough blend near the career break year | $190,496,850 |
| Film pay, modeled post-breakthrough supporting roles (23 of 59 films) 12.0% of lead cells: lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio | $40,279,668 |
| Mga backend point, tinantiya 12% of disclosed lead deals included points, at a median 2.6% of box office; expected value on 27 commercially viable undisclosed lead roles; cash spread over 3 years; 6 film(s) used band-specific box-office/budget multiples as a gross proxy | $7,626,697 |
| Mga pag-endorso, tinantyang (1 brand partnership) 1 named partnerships x the $4.0M annual fee from the median disclosed film deal x a 4-year term, spread across the deal years | $16,000,000 |
| Nalalabi, tinatantya SAG residual rates on post-theatrical receipts assumed at half of box office, split by role share and spread over the ten years after each release; 14 film(s) used band-specific box-office proxies | $19,280,750 |
| Puhunan returns sa savings mixed portfolio: 55% actual 60/40 securities returns (taxed) + 45% US long-run home-price rate on the rest | $76,602,767 |
| Expenses | |
| Mga bayarin sa representasyon ahente 10% + abogado 5% | -$40,589,907 |
| Taxes Mga epektibong rate ng US-NY, taon-taon | -$103,013,742 |
| Personal na paggasta measured household savings rates by income, times a 88% entertainment-household factor | -$70,000,048 |
| Tinatayang netong halaga | $133,598,452 |
Pelikula ayon sa Pelikula
| Film | Year | Role | Budget | Box office | Binilang ang bayad |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| The Invite no disclosed fee: modeled on the $23.8M shrunk median for 2020s/large (n=2), capped at $10.5M | 2026 | Lead | $70,000,000 | $32,900,000 | $10,500,000 |
| The American Revolution no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $23.8M shrunk median for 2020s/large (n=2) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio) | 2025 | Supporting | $70,000,000 | – | $2,850,000 |
| The Tiger no disclosed fee: modeled on the $23.8M shrunk median for 2020s/large (n=2), capped at $10.5M | 2025 | Lead | $70,000,000 | – | $10,500,000 |
| A Complete Unknown no disclosed fee: modeled on the $23.8M shrunk median for 2020s/large (n=2), capped at $9.8M | 2024 | Lead | $65,000,000 | $140,500,000 | $9,750,000 |
| Sausage Party: Foodtopia no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $23.8M shrunk median for 2020s/large (n=2) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio) | 2024 | Supporting | $70,000,000 | – | $2,850,000 |
| Asteroid City no disclosed fee: modeled on the $21.7M shrunk median for 2020s/mid (n=1), capped at $3.8M | 2023 | Lead | $25,000,000 | $53,857,743 | $3,750,000 |
| Extrapolations no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $23.8M shrunk median for 2020s/large (n=2) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio) | 2023 | Supporting | $70,000,000 | – | $2,850,000 |
| Carl Foreman no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $25.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio), capped at 15% of budget | 2022 | Supporting | $6,000,000 | $28,900,000 | $900,000 |
| Glass Onion: A Knives Out Mystery no disclosed fee: modeled on the $21.7M shrunk median for 2020s/mid (n=1), capped at $6.0M | 2022 | Lead | $40,000,000 | $15,000,000 | $6,000,000 |
| The French Dispatch no disclosed fee: modeled on the $21.7M shrunk median for 2020s/mid (n=1), capped at $3.8M | 2021 | Lead | $25,000,000 | $46,333,545 | $3,750,000 |
| Alita: Battle Angel no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $20.0M shrunk median for 2010s/tentpole (n=12) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio) | 2019 | Supporting | $170,000,000 | $405,000,000 | $2,400,000 |
| Motherless Brooklyn no disclosed fee: modeled on the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3), capped at $3.9M | 2019 | Lead | $26,000,000 | $18,600,000 | $3,899,999 |
| Ask the StoryBots no disclosed fee: modeled on the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3), capped at $6.0M | 2018 | Lead | $40,000,000 | – | $5,999,998 |
| Gotti no disclosed fee: modeled on the $5.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid), capped at $1.5M | 2018 | Lead | $10,000,000 | $6,400,000 | $1,499,999 |
| Isle of Dogs no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio) | 2018 | Supporting | $35,000,000 | $64,337,744 | $1,320,000 |
| The Guardian Brothers no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $5.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio) | 2017 | Supporting | $12,000,000 | $11,900,000 | $600,000 |
| Collateral Beauty no disclosed fee: modeled on the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3), capped at $5.4M | 2016 | Lead | $36,000,000 | $88,500,000 | $5,399,992 |
| Sausage Party no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $5.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio) | 2016 | Supporting | $19,000,000 | $140,705,322 | $599,999 |
| Last Week Tonight with John Oliver no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio) | 2015 | Supporting | $40,000,000 | – | $1,319,997 |
| Birdman or (The Unexpected Virtue of Ignorance) no disclosed fee: modeled on the $5.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid), capped at $2.7M | 2014 | Lead | $18,000,000 | $103,215,094 | $2,699,984 |
| My Own Man no disclosed fee: modeled on the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3), capped at $6.0M | 2014 | Lead | $40,000,000 | – | $5,999,965 |
| The Grand Budapest Hotel no disclosed fee: modeled on the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3), capped at $3.8M | 2014 | Lead | $25,000,000 | $174,801,324 | $3,749,979 |
| Salinger no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio) | 2013 | Supporting | $40,000,000 | $650,675 | $1,319,987 |
| Spring Break Anthem no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio) | 2013 | Supporting | $40,000,000 | – | $1,319,987 |
| Moonrise Kingdom no disclosed fee: modeled on the $5.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid), capped at $2.4M | 2012 | Lead | $16,000,000 | $68,264,022 | $2,399,947 |
| Thanks for Sharing no disclosed fee: modeled on the $5.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid), capped at $0.5M | 2012 | Lead | $3,500,000 | $3,500,000 | $524,991 |
| The Bourne Legacy no disclosed fee: modeled on the $20.0M shrunk median for 2010s/tentpole (n=12), capped at $18.8M | 2012 | Lead | $125,000,000 | $276,144,750 | $18,749,575 |
| The Dictator no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $20.0M shrunk median for 2010s/large (n=8) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio) | 2012 | Supporting | $65,000,000 | $179,379,533 | $2,399,956 |
| Leaves of Grass no disclosed fee: modeled on the $5.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid), capped at $1.4M | 2010 | Lead | $9,000,000 | $1,018,000 | $1,349,892 |
| Stone no disclosed fee: modeled on the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3), capped at $3.3M | 2010 | Lead | $22,000,000 | $10,300,000 | $3,299,733 |
| By the People: The Election of Barack Obama no disclosed fee: modeled on the $19.4M shrunk median for 2000s/mid (n=2), capped at $6.0M | 2009 | Lead | $40,000,000 | – | $5,999,050 |
| The Invention of Lying no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $18.8M median for its era and nearest band (mid) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio) | 2009 | Supporting | $18,500,000 | $32,406,507 | $2,249,693 |
| Bustin' Down the Door no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $19.4M shrunk median for 2000s/mid (n=2) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio) | 2008 | Supporting | $40,000,000 | – | $2,324,383 |
| Pride and Glory no disclosed fee: modeled on the $19.4M shrunk median for 2000s/mid (n=2), capped at $4.5M | 2008 | Lead | $30,000,000 | $31,200,000 | $4,498,653 |
| The Incredible Hulk no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $11.8M shrunk median for 2000s/tentpole (n=9) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio) | 2008 | Supporting | $150,000,000 | $263,427,551 | $1,417,805 |
| Documentary Film no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $19.4M shrunk median for 2000s/mid (n=2) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio) | 2007 | Supporting | $40,000,000 | – | $2,323,798 |
| Man from Plains no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $18.8M median for its era and nearest band (mid) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio), capped at 15% of budget | 2007 | Supporting | $108,807 | $108,807 | $16,321 |
| The Simpsons Movie no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $20.0M shrunk median for 2000s/large (n=18) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio) | 2007 | Supporting | $75,000,000 | $527,071,022 | $2,398,759 |
| The Illusionist no disclosed fee: modeled on the $18.8M median for its era and nearest band (mid), capped at $2.5M | 2006 | Lead | $17,000,000 | $87,892,388 | $2,547,355 |
| The Painted Veil no disclosed fee: modeled on the $18.8M median for its era and nearest band (mid), capped at $2.9M | 2006 | Lead | $19,400,000 | $26,900,000 | $2,906,897 |
| Down in the Valley no disclosed fee: modeled on the $18.8M median for its era and nearest band (mid), capped at $1.2M | 2005 | Lead | $8,000,000 | $568,932 | $1,198,192 |
| Kingdom of Heaven no disclosed fee: modeled on the $11.8M shrunk median for 2000s/tentpole (n=9) | 2005 | Lead | $135,000,000 | $164,000,000 | $11,789,690 |
| Stella no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $19.4M shrunk median for 2000s/mid (n=2) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio) | 2005 | Supporting | $40,000,000 | – | $2,320,449 |
| After the Sunset no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $20.0M shrunk median for 2000s/large (n=18) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio) | 2004 | Supporting | $58,500,000 | $62,700,000 | $2,390,871 |
| Dirty Work no disclosed fee: modeled on the $19.4M shrunk median for 2000s/mid (n=2), capped at $6.0M | 2004 | Lead | $40,000,000 | – | $5,973,499 |
| The Italian Job no disclosed fee: modeled on the $20.0M shrunk median for 2000s/large (n=18), capped at $9.0M | 2003 | Lead | $60,000,000 | $176,070,171 | $8,920,814 |
| 25th Hour no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $18.8M median for its era and nearest band (mid) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio), capped at 15% of budget | 2002 | Supporting | $5,000,000 | $23,900,000 | $744,941 |
| Death to Smoochy no disclosed fee: modeled on the $20.0M shrunk median for 2000s/large (n=18), capped at $7.5M | 2002 | Lead | $50,000,000 | $8,300,000 | $7,374,097 |
| Frida no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $18.8M median for its era and nearest band (mid) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio), capped at 15% of budget | 2002 | Supporting | $12,000,000 | $56,300,000 | $1,776,056 |
| Red Dragon no disclosed fee: modeled on the $20.0M shrunk median for 2000s/large (n=18), capped at $11.7M | 2002 | Lead | $78,000,000 | $209,196,298 | $11,498,554 |
| The Score no disclosed fee: modeled on the $20.0M shrunk median for 2000s/large (n=18), capped at $10.2M | 2001 | Lead | $68,000,000 | $113,500,000 | $9,865,882 |
| Keeping the Faith no disclosed fee: modeled on the $19.4M shrunk median for 2000s/mid (n=2), capped at $4.3M | 2000 | Lead | $29,000,000 | $59,900,000 | $4,098,854 |
| Fight Club no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $14.6M shrunk median for 1990s/large (n=3) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio) | 1999 | Supporting | $63,000,000 | $101,209,702 | $1,586,666 |
| American History X soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.79): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $14.4M shrunk median for 1990s/mid (n=6), capped at $3.0M vs early terms | 1998 | Lead | $20,000,000 | $23,800,000 | $2,449,143 |
| Out of the Past soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.79): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $14.4M shrunk median for 1990s/mid (n=6), capped at $3.9M vs early terms | 1998 | Lead | $26,000,000 | – | $3,161,395 |
| Rounders soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.79): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $10.0M shrunk median for 1990s/small (n=1), capped at $1.8M vs early terms | 1998 | Lead | $12,000,000 | $22,900,000 | $1,476,657 |
| Everyone Says I Love You soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.50): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $14.4M shrunk median for 1990s/mid (n=6), capped at $3.0M vs early terms | 1996 | Lead | $20,000,000 | $9,800,000 | $1,679,688 |
| Primal Fear soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.50): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $14.4M shrunk median for 1990s/mid (n=6), capped at $4.5M vs early terms | 1996 | Lead | $30,000,000 | $102,616,183 | $2,429,688 |
| The People vs. Larry Flynt soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.50): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $14.4M shrunk median for 1990s/mid (n=6), capped at $5.2M vs early terms | 1996 | Lead | $35,000,000 | $43,000,000 | $2,804,688 |
Paano gumagana ang mga modelong figure. An undisclosed lead role after the breakthrough gets the median of disclosed lead salaries for its era and budget band, capped at 15% of the film’s budget. Supporting and pre-breakthrough roles get 2.5% of that median, the documented going rate for actors before stardom. Films with no reported budget are treated as small productions. Undocumented backend, endorsements, and producer or director credits enter as separate estimated lines in the calculation above, built from disclosed medians. Every median comes from the published tables on our pahina ng metodolohiya.
Net Worth Sa Paglipas ng Panahon
Nakamodelong balanse sa katapusan ng bawat taon, na tumutugma sa talahanayan sa bawat taon sa ibaba.
Taon-taon
| Year | Income | Mga bayarin sa Rep | Halaga ng buwis | Spent | Saved | Balance |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | $8,152,760 | $1,222,914 | 45% | $2,100,852 | $1,710,563 | $133,598,452 |
| 2025 | $13,252,932 | $1,987,940 | 45% | $3,415,095 | $2,780,651 | $129,270,168 |
| 2024 | $13,532,667 | $2,029,900 | 45% | $3,487,179 | $2,839,343 | $117,901,457 |
| 2023 | $8,968,247 | $1,345,237 | 45% | $2,310,992 | $1,881,664 | $106,542,596 |
| 2022 | $7,542,675 | $1,131,401 | 45% | $1,943,642 | $1,582,559 | $96,062,255 |
| 2021 | $5,400,152 | $810,023 | 45% | $1,391,544 | $1,133,028 | $101,387,751 |
| 2020 | $1,860,916 | $279,137 | 45% | $479,532 | $390,446 | $92,468,974 |
| 2019 | $5,122,723 | $768,408 | 45% | $1,320,054 | $1,074,819 | $85,709,937 |
| 2018 | $8,879,034 | $1,331,855 | 45% | $2,288,003 | $1,862,946 | $76,495,050 |
| 2017 | $3,893,950 | $584,093 | 47% | $966,929 | $787,296 | $74,198,784 |
| 2016 | $5,558,506 | $833,776 | 47% | $1,380,264 | $1,123,843 | $68,219,094 |
| 2015 | $3,909,903 | $586,485 | 47% | $970,890 | $790,521 | $63,780,332 |
| 2014 | $10,495,961 | $1,574,394 | 47% | $2,606,311 | $2,122,120 | $61,495,921 |
| 2013 | $6,707,197 | $1,006,080 | 47% | $1,665,502 | $1,356,091 | $55,957,063 |
| 2012 | $18,676,610 | $2,801,491 | 43% | $4,987,708 | $4,061,109 | $50,002,012 |
| 2011 | $8,038,379 | $1,205,757 | 43% | $2,146,701 | $1,747,894 | $43,065,021 |
| 2010 | $4,131,489 | $619,723 | 43% | $1,103,341 | $898,366 | $39,789,220 |
| 2009 | $8,014,159 | $1,202,124 | 43% | $2,140,232 | $1,742,628 | $36,404,219 |
| 2008 | $9,122,410 | $1,368,362 | 43% | $2,436,198 | $1,983,610 | $31,639,071 |
| 2007 | $6,718,279 | $1,007,742 | 43% | $1,794,159 | $1,460,847 | $32,599,166 |
| 2006 | $6,263,930 | $939,590 | 43% | $1,672,823 | $1,362,052 | $29,788,028 |
| 2005 | $13,331,146 | $1,999,672 | 43% | $3,560,168 | $2,898,772 | $26,653,736 |
| 2004 | $11,422,205 | $1,713,331 | 43% | $3,050,373 | $2,483,685 | $22,920,210 |
| 2003 | $9,668,479 | $1,450,272 | 43% | $2,582,029 | $2,102,349 | $19,383,561 |
| 2002 | $18,307,044 | $2,746,057 | 46% | $4,631,697 | $3,771,236 | $15,738,719 |
| 2001 | $13,698,447 | $2,054,767 | 46% | $3,465,718 | $2,821,869 | $12,339,265 |
| 2000 | $6,145,790 | $921,868 | 46% | $1,554,890 | $1,266,028 | $9,521,490 |
| 1999 | $6,581,417 | $987,213 | 46% | $1,665,104 | $1,355,767 | $8,127,095 |
| 1998 | $9,772,086 | $1,465,813 | 46% | $2,472,346 | $2,013,042 | $6,322,509 |
| 1997 | $6,367,151 | $955,073 | 46% | $1,610,894 | $1,311,628 | $3,898,885 |
| 1996 | $8,988,519 | $1,348,278 | 46% | $2,274,103 | $1,851,628 | $2,312,622 |
| 1995 | $2,074,219 | $311,133 | 46% | $524,779 | $427,287 | $427,287 |
Model Notes
- RESIDENCE PROXY: residence na hindi indibidwal na pinanggalingan para sa batch na ito; Inilapat ang default ng US-CA hanggang sa naidokumento
- salary comps: 2 disclosed lead fee(s) flagged as non-market outliers (scale / far-below-quote) and excluded from era medians
- Credit ng larawan: Wikimedia Commons via Wikipedia (Edward Norton)
Pamamaraan
We rebuild Edward’s career as a yearly time series. Disclosed salaries and documented backend enter as reported, with citations. Undisclosed lead roles get the median of disclosed salaries for their era and budget band, capped at 15% of the film’s budget. Supporting roles and roles from before the breakthrough get 2.5% of that median, the going-rate ratio measured from disclosed pre-stardom deals. Films with no reported budget are treated as small productions, and every role is estimated unless a source documents it was unpaid. Representation fees come out at sourced rates, taxes follow the eras actually lived through, spending follows measured household savings behavior unless court documents say otherwise, and what remains compounds at real market returns. Undocumented backend enters as an expected value from disclosed deals, endorsements at the median disclosed ambassador fee, and producer or director credits at union-scale floors.
Ang buong modelo, bawat talahanayan ng rate, at kung paano nasuri ang aming mga pagtatantya laban sa mga tunay na deal ay nasa pahina ng metodolohiya.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is Edward Norton's net worth in 2026?
As of 2026, Edward Norton's net worth is an estimated $133.6 Million. The estimate is built film by film from disclosed salaries and documented backend, then year by year: income, minus representation fees and taxes, minus spending, compounded at real market returns.
How does Edward Norton make money?
Mga suweldo sa pelikula at dokumentadong partisipasyon sa backend.
How is Edward Norton's net worth calculated?
Disclosed paydays enter as reported, with citations. Undisclosed lead roles use the median of disclosed salaries for their era and budget band, capped at 15% of the film's budget, and supporting or early-career roles use the documented pre-stardom fraction of that median. We subtract sourced representation fees, taxes for the years Edward actually worked, and spending from measured savings behavior, then compound at real market returns. Undocumented backend, endorsements, and producing credits enter as estimated lines from disclosed medians. Every rate and source is published.
How much does Edward Norton make per film?
Nag-iiba-iba ito ayon sa papel at panahon, at ang talahanayan ng film-by-film sa itaas ay naglilista ng bayad na binibilang para sa bawat pamagat. Ang mga isiniwalat na araw ng suweldo ay pumasok tulad ng iniulat. Ang mga hindi nasabi na tungkulin ay na-modelo mula sa kung ano ang maihahambing na mga aktor na kinita sa parehong panahon at hanay ng badyet, na may mga pangunahing tungkulin pagkatapos ng pambihirang tagumpay na kumikita ng pinakamaraming at sumusuporta o maagang mga tungkulin ay isang dokumentadong bahagi nito.
Bakit napakataas ng rate ng buwis, at hindi ba ito iniiwasan ng mga aktor sa isang loan-out na kumpanya?
Tax comes out at the effective rate for where Edward lived each year, which is the rate shown in the year-by-year table. In a high-tax state like California, combined federal and state income tax reaches close to half of a top earner's income, so those years run in the mid-40s percent. A loan-out company, the corporation many actors run their income through, does not lower the tax on the money they take home. Its real advantage is deducting business costs such as agent, manager, and attorney fees, and the model already subtracts those as a separate line before any tax is applied. High-earning performers also fall outside the pass-through business deduction that other company owners can claim, so it buys them no rate cut.
Bakit naiiba ang figure na ito sa ibang net worth na mga site?
Most sites publish a single number with no way to check it. This estimate is built in the open: every salary, rate, and assumption is on the page, and the pahina ng metodolohiya lists every source.
Gaano katumpak ang pagtatantya na ito?
Walang eksaktong pagtatantya ng net worth para sa isang pribadong indibidwal; ang isang ito ay isang modelong binuo mula sa pampublikong data. Ang pagkakaiba ay makikita mo kung paano ito binuo at suriin ang bawat hakbang. Ang grado ng kumpiyansa na malapit sa tuktok ng kalkulasyon ay nagpapakita kung gaano kalaki ang bilang na nakasalalay sa mga ibinunyag na numero, at ang pahina ay nagba-flag kung saan ang isang numero ay nakasandal sa isang pagpapalagay.
Is Edward Norton rich compared to the average person?
Yes. A net worth of $133.6 Million is far above the median American household, which sits near $193,000 according to Federal Reserve data.
What is Edward Norton's biggest source of wealth?
On this page it is film salaries, the largest line in the calculation at $190.5 Million. The full breakdown, with every other line and its source, is above.
How much does Edward Norton make from endorsements?
The model counts $16.0 Million in career endorsement income for Edward: 1 named partnerships x the $4.0M annual fee from the median disclosed film deal x a 4-year term, spread across the deal years. It is an estimate, since the individual deal values are not all public, and it sits as its own line in the calculation above.
Galugarin ang Iba Pang Aktor
Tungkol sa NetWorth Explained
We originally created NWE because nobody in the public-figure net worth space showed their work. Magazines and sites threw out big numbers while hiding behind vague claims of “proprietary algorithms” o “insider knowledge.” That’s why we started the world’s only publication that transparently showed every assumption, every variable, and every calculation. We’re still the only ones who do it this way. Magbasa pa tungkol sa NetWorth Explained.