Jason Statham Tài sản ròng 2026
Cập nhật lần cuối August 3, 2026
As of 2026, Jason Statham has an estimated net worth of $141.5 Million, computed film by film and year by year from public records and published rates. Every input, rate, and source behind the number is on this page.
Calculation
- Mức lương được tiết lộ và phần phụ trợ được ghi lại, mỗi phần đều có trích dẫn
- Các vai trò không được tiết lộ được mô phỏng từ những vai trò có thể so sánh được tiết lộ cho thời đại, mức ngân sách và giai đoạn sự nghiệp của họ
- Phần phụ trợ, chứng thực và tạo ra các khoản tín dụng ước tính từ mức trung bình được tiết lộ
Fast Facts
| Birthdate | July 26, 1967 |
|---|---|
| Birthplace | Shirebrook |
| Breakthrough | Lock, Stock and Two Smoking Barrels (1998) |
| Best Known | The Transporter (2002) |
Who Is Jason Statham?
Jason Statham was born July 26, 1967 in Shirebrook, best known for The Transporter (2002). The earnings behind Jason's net worth come from film salaries, backend participation, and producing and directing fees.
The model tracks Jason's earning years from 1997 to 2026, with the biggest single year in 2023 at about $62.9 Million of gross income. After representation fees, taxes, and living costs, what stays invested compounds at market returns into an estimated $141.5 Million today.
Data
Mỗi dòng bên dưới được tính toán từ dữ liệu công khai và bảng giá được công bố trên trang của chúng tôi trang phương pháp. Sự tự tin: hạng C. Các số liệu được ghi lại chỉ bao gồm một phần nhỏ của con số này, vì vậy hầu hết nó được mô hình hóa từ các tỷ lệ đã công bố và các điểm so sánh (các điểm chạy từ A, hầu hết được ghi lại, đến C, chủ yếu được mô hình hóa).
The Calculation
| Line | Amount |
|---|---|
| Revenue | |
| Film pay with a disclosed figure (3 of 43 films) lương mỗi phim và phụ trợ từ báo cáo được trích dẫn | $63,000,000 |
| Film pay, modeled lead roles (29 of 43 films) era and budget-band medians of disclosed lead salaries (winsorized, thin cells shrunk toward the era median), blended with this actor's disclosed quote history when available; soft breakthrough blend near the career break year | $239,502,292 |
| Film pay, modeled post-breakthrough supporting roles (5 of 43 films) 12.0% of lead cells: lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio | $9,857,141 |
| Film pay, modeled supporting and early roles (6 of 43 films) 2,5% mức trung bình của thời đại: tỷ lệ trước khi trở thành ngôi sao | $4,867,163 |
| Điểm phụ trợ, ước tính 12% of disclosed lead deals included points, at a median 2.6% of box office; expected value on 19 commercially viable undisclosed lead roles; cash spread over 3 years | $7,667,670 |
| Producer, director, and writer credits, estimated (3 credits) union-scale floor per credit, scaled to each era; post-breakthrough lead packages use a multiple of that floor; actual packages often run higher | $3,216,096 |
| Số dư, ước tính SAG residual rates on post-theatrical receipts assumed at half of box office, split by role share and spread over the ten years after each release | $29,900,846 |
| Lợi tức đầu tư từ tiền tiết kiệm mixed portfolio: 55% actual 60/40 securities returns (taxed) + 45% US long-run home-price rate on the rest | $59,193,462 |
| Rising Glen home, Hollywood Hills appreciation, estimated documented $2,700,000 purchase in 2015, sold 2021 for a documented $5,075,000, actual sale price, net 7% selling costs; the purchase itself is already counted in savings (francisyork.com) | $2,019,750 |
| Chelsea townhouse, London appreciation, estimated documented $9,600,000 purchase in 2020 (reported GBP 7.5M, converted at the 2020 average rate), 5.0%/yr UK appreciation, net 7% selling costs; the purchase itself is already counted in savings (telegrafi.com) | $2,364,374 |
| Hampshire coastal estate (land) appreciation, estimated documented $25,400,000 purchase in 2024 (reported GBP 20M land purchase, converted; the further ~GBP 5M build enters when documented), 5.0%/yr UK appreciation, net 7% selling costs; the purchase itself is already counted in savings (portsmouth.co.uk) | $643,255 |
| Expenses | |
| Phí đại diện đại lý 10% + luật sư 5% | -$52,704,291 |
| Taxes US-CA then UK then US-CA then UK effective rates, year by year | -$126,326,452 |
| Chi tiêu cá nhân measured household savings rates by income, times a 88% entertainment-household factor | -$95,027,280 |
| Giá trị ròng ước tính | $141,524,762 |
Phim theo phim
| Film | Year | Role | Budget | Phòng vé | Tính lương |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A Working Man no disclosed fee: modeled on the $21.7M shrunk median for 2020s/mid (n=1); personal blend cut to 47% on a smaller-than-usual budget; blended 47% with this actor's disclosed quote history ($25.0M personal, n=3); cap raised to similar-budget personal max within 50% of budget ($20.0M), capped at $20.0M | 2025 | Chì + P | $40,000,000 | $100,600,000 | $19,999,996 |
| The Beekeeper disclosed: reported $25M | 2024 | Chì + P | $40,000,000 | $162,600,000 | $25,000,000 |
| Expend4bles no disclosed fee: modeled on the $16.4M shrunk median for 2020s/tentpole (n=5); blended 75% with this actor's disclosed quote history ($25.0M personal, n=3); cap raised to similar-budget personal max within 50% of budget ($25.0M) | 2023 | Chì + P | $100,000,000 | $51,000,000 | $22,857,124 |
| Nhanh X no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $18.0M shrunk median for 2020s/blockbuster (n=8) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio) | 2023 | Supporting | $340,000,000 | $704,900,000 | $2,999,998 |
| Meg 2: The Trench disclosed: reported $25M | 2023 | Lead | $129,000,000 | $397,400,000 | $25,000,000 |
| Operation Fortune: Ruse de Guerre no disclosed fee: modeled on the $23.8M shrunk median for 2020s/large (n=2); personal blend cut to 58% on a smaller-than-usual budget; blended 58% with this actor's disclosed quote history ($25.0M personal, n=3); cap raised to similar-budget personal max within 50% of budget ($25.0M) | 2023 | Lead | $50,000,000 | $45,700,000 | $24,476,724 |
| Wrath of Man no disclosed fee: modeled on the $21.7M shrunk median for 2020s/mid (n=1); personal blend cut to 30% on a smaller-than-usual budget; blended 30% with this actor's disclosed quote history ($13.0M personal, n=1); cap raised to similar-budget personal max within 50% of budget ($13.0M), capped at $13.0M | 2021 | Lead | $40,000,000 | $104,000,000 | $12,999,961 |
| Fast & Furious Presents: Hobbs & Shaw disclosed: reported $13M plus EP credit | 2019 | Lead | $200,000,000 | $760,000,000 | $13,000,000 |
| The Meg no disclosed fee: modeled on the $20.0M shrunk median for 2010s/tentpole (n=12); blended 75% with this actor's disclosed quote history ($13.0M personal, n=1) | 2018 | Lead | $178,000,000 | $530,200,000 | $14,749,668 |
| The Fate of the Furious no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $15.8M shrunk median for 2010s/blockbuster (n=11) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio) | 2017 | Supporting | $270,000,000 | $1,236,000,000 | $1,892,240 |
| Furious 7 no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $15.8M shrunk median for 2010s/blockbuster (n=11) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio) | 2015 | Supporting | $250,000,000 | $1,516,000,000 | $1,892,050 |
| Spy no disclosed fee: modeled on the $20.0M shrunk median for 2010s/large (n=8), capped at $9.8M | 2015 | Lead | $65,000,000 | $235,700,000 | $9,748,407 |
| Wild Card no disclosed fee: modeled on the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3), capped at $4.5M | 2015 | Lead | $30,000,000 | $6,700,000 | $4,499,272 |
| The Expendables 3 no disclosed fee: modeled on the $20.0M shrunk median for 2010s/tentpole (n=12), capped at $15.0M | 2014 | Lead | $100,000,000 | $214,700,000 | $14,995,137 |
| Homefront no disclosed fee: modeled on the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3), capped at $3.3M | 2013 | Lead | $22,000,000 | $51,700,000 | $3,298,025 |
| Hummingbird no disclosed fee: modeled on the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3), capped at $3.0M | 2013 | Lead | $20,000,000 | $12,600,000 | $2,998,221 |
| Safe no disclosed fee: modeled on the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3), capped at $4.5M | 2012 | Lead | $30,000,000 | $40,600,000 | $4,494,630 |
| The Expendables 2 no disclosed fee: modeled on the $20.0M shrunk median for 2010s/tentpole (n=12), capped at $15.0M | 2012 | Lead | $100,000,000 | $315,000,000 | $14,981,570 |
| Blitz no disclosed fee: modeled on the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3), capped at $5.2M | 2011 | Lead | $35,000,000 | $15,800,000 | $5,237,699 |
| Gnomeo & Juliet no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio) | 2011 | Supporting | $36,000,000 | $193,900,000 | $1,317,416 |
| Killer Elite no disclosed fee: modeled on the $20.0M shrunk median for 2010s/large (n=8), capped at $10.5M | 2011 | Lead | $70,000,000 | $56,400,000 | $10,475,274 |
| The Mechanic no disclosed fee: modeled on the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3), capped at $6.0M | 2011 | Lead | $40,000,000 | $76,300,000 | $5,985,844 |
| The Expendables no disclosed fee: modeled on the $20.0M shrunk median for 2010s/large (n=8), capped at $12.3M | 2010 | Lead | $82,000,000 | $274,500,000 | $12,243,304 |
| Crank: High Voltage no disclosed fee: modeled on the $19.4M shrunk median for 2000s/mid (n=2), capped at $3.0M | 2009 | Lead | $20,000,000 | $34,600,000 | $2,976,565 |
| Death Race no disclosed fee: modeled on the $20.0M shrunk median for 2000s/large (n=18), capped at $9.8M | 2008 | Lead | $65,000,000 | $76,000,000 | $9,583,628 |
| In the Name of the King no disclosed fee: modeled on the $20.0M shrunk median for 2000s/large (n=18), capped at $9.0M | 2008 | Lead | $60,000,000 | $13,100,000 | $8,847,117 |
| The Bank Job no disclosed fee: modeled on the $19.4M shrunk median for 2000s/mid (n=2), capped at $3.0M | 2008 | Lead | $20,000,000 | $66,099,999 | $2,954,753 |
| Transporter 3 no disclosed fee: modeled on the $19.4M shrunk median for 2000s/mid (n=2), capped at $6.2M | 2008 | Lead | $41,102,852 | $109,000,000 | $6,063,247 |
| War no disclosed fee: modeled on the $19.4M shrunk median for 2000s/mid (n=2), capped at $3.8M | 2007 | Lead | $25,000,000 | $40,700,000 | $3,637,515 |
| Crank no disclosed fee: modeled on the $18.8M median for its era and nearest band (mid), capped at $1.8M | 2006 | Lead | $12,000,000 | $42,900,000 | $1,713,510 |
| Chaos no disclosed fee: modeled on the $19.4M shrunk median for 2000s/mid (n=2), capped at $3.7M | 2005 | Lead | $24,746,578 | $7,000,000 | $3,327,246 |
| London no disclosed fee: modeled on the $19.4M shrunk median for 2000s/mid (n=2), capped at $4.2M | 2005 | Lead | $27,946,169 | $200,361 | $3,749,975 |
| Revolver no disclosed fee: modeled on the $19.4M shrunk median for 2000s/mid (n=2), capped at $4.0M | 2005 | Lead | $26,622,389 | $6,700,000 | $3,575,077 |
| Transporter 2 no disclosed fee: modeled on the $19.4M shrunk median for 2000s/mid (n=2), capped at $4.9M | 2005 | Lead | $32,469,540 | $89,100,000 | $4,347,600 |
| Cellular soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.79): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $19.4M shrunk median for 2000s/mid (n=2), capped at $3.8M vs early terms | 2004 | Lead | $25,000,000 | $57,700,000 | $3,068,763 |
| The Italian Job soft-breakthrough supporting blend (w=0.66) | 2003 | Supporting | $60,000,000 | $176,100,000 | $1,755,437 |
| The Transporter soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.50): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $18.8M median for its era and nearest band (mid), capped at $2.8M vs early terms | 2002 | Lead | $18,427,530 | $43,900,000 | $1,616,440 |
| Ghosts of Mars soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.34): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $19.4M shrunk median for 2000s/mid (n=2), capped at $4.2M vs early terms | 2001 | Lead | $28,000,000 | $14,000,000 | $1,744,877 |
| Mean Machine soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.34): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $18.8M median for its era and nearest band (mid), capped at $0.5M vs early terms | 2001 | Lead | $3,571,429 | $7,300,000 | $491,467 |
| The One soft-breakthrough supporting blend (w=0.34) | 2001 | Supporting | $49,000,000 | $78,000,000 | $1,108,795 |
| Snatch soft-breakthrough supporting blend (w=0.21) | 2000 | Supporting | $10,000,000 | $83,600,000 | $683,878 |
| Turn It Up soft-breakthrough supporting blend (w=0.21) | 2000 | Supporting | $13,000,000 | $1,200,000 | $777,751 |
| Lock, Stock and Two Smoking Barrels no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $2.0M median for its era and nearest band (small) (pre-stardom rate) | 1998 | Supporting | $1,400,000 | $28,100,000 | $60,395 |
Các số liệu được mô hình hóa hoạt động như thế nào. An undisclosed lead role after the breakthrough gets the median of disclosed lead salaries for its era and budget band, capped at 15% of the film’s budget. Supporting and pre-breakthrough roles get 2.5% of that median, the documented going rate for actors before stardom. Films with no reported budget are treated as small productions. Undocumented backend, endorsements, and producer or director credits enter as separate estimated lines in the calculation above, built from disclosed medians. Every median comes from the published tables on our trang phương pháp.
Tài sản ròng Over Time
Số dư theo mô hình vào cuối mỗi năm, phù hợp với bảng theo từng năm dưới đây.
Từng năm
| Year | Income | Phí đại diện | Thuế suất | Spent | Saved | Balance |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | $1,660,194 | $249,029 | 40% | $466,700 | $379,998 | $141,524,762 |
| 2025 | $17,034,756 | $2,555,213 | 40% | $4,788,674 | $3,899,051 | $133,415,716 |
| 2024 | $33,962,992 | $5,094,449 | 40% | $9,547,405 | $7,773,721 | $120,217,950 |
| 2023 | $62,946,064 | $9,441,910 | 40% | $17,694,894 | $14,407,599 | $103,627,422 |
| 2022 | $16,951,720 | $2,542,758 | 40% | $4,765,332 | $3,880,045 | $81,445,953 |
| 2021 | $11,005,893 | $1,650,884 | 40% | $3,093,889 | $2,519,117 | $83,237,280 |
| 2020 | $6,404,115 | $960,617 | 40% | $1,800,274 | $1,465,825 | $74,075,121 |
| 2019 | $15,073,239 | $2,260,986 | 45% | $3,884,163 | $3,162,577 | $67,297,055 |
| 2018 | $12,240,003 | $1,836,000 | 45% | $3,154,077 | $2,568,124 | $57,966,129 |
| 2017 | $7,210,208 | $1,081,531 | 47% | $1,790,407 | $1,457,792 | $55,076,359 |
| 2016 | $2,273,105 | $340,966 | 47% | $564,447 | $459,586 | $49,826,126 |
| 2015 | $12,754,923 | $1,913,238 | 47% | $3,167,246 | $2,578,846 | $46,927,529 |
| 2014 | $16,824,788 | $2,523,718 | 47% | $4,177,857 | $3,401,710 | $43,296,892 |
| 2013 | $10,238,043 | $1,535,706 | 47% | $2,542,266 | $2,069,973 | $37,599,366 |
| 2012 | $16,896,674 | $2,534,501 | 43% | $4,512,365 | $3,674,074 | $32,536,804 |
| 2011 | $22,908,693 | $3,436,304 | 43% | $6,117,913 | $4,981,349 | $27,055,935 |
| 2010 | $16,457,283 | $2,468,593 | 43% | $4,395,023 | $3,578,531 | $21,258,269 |
| 2009 | $6,479,423 | $971,913 | 43% | $1,730,371 | $1,408,909 | $16,549,316 |
| 2008 | $20,685,514 | $3,102,827 | 43% | $5,524,199 | $4,497,933 | $13,820,151 |
| 2007 | $11,169,728 | $1,675,459 | 43% | $2,982,947 | $2,428,786 | $10,247,574 |
| 2006 | $2,671,429 | $400,714 | 43% | $713,422 | $580,885 | $7,479,732 |
| 2005 | $11,289,716 | $1,693,457 | 43% | $3,014,991 | $2,454,877 | $6,468,733 |
| 2004 | $6,843,415 | $1,026,512 | 40% | $1,923,766 | $1,566,375 | $3,872,809 |
| 2003 | $2,260,475 | $339,071 | 40% | $635,447 | $517,396 | $2,201,829 |
| 2002 | $1,743,103 | $261,465 | 40% | $490,007 | $398,975 | $1,556,123 |
| 2001 | $2,842,787 | $426,418 | 40% | $799,142 | $650,680 | $1,193,095 |
| 2000 | $2,030,729 | $304,609 | 40% | $570,862 | $464,809 | $542,649 |
| 1999 | $442,535 | $66,380 | 40% | $152,207 | $73,486 | $76,629 |
| 1998 | $42,277 | $6,341 | 40% | $19,474 | $2,087 | $2,963 |
| 1997 | $18,119 | $2,718 | 46% | $7,511 | $805 | $805 |
Model Notes
- RESIDENCE PROXY: UK resident through his early career, documented Los Angeles base since the mid-2000s
- salary comps: 2 disclosed lead fee(s) flagged as non-market outliers (scale / far-below-quote) and excluded from era medians
- UK filing check: attributable company net assets $540,616 (REME Enterprises Limited (03996313, GBP 432,477 at 2025-05-31, band mid 88%); REME (Featherman) Limited (07205679, GBP 521,335 at 2025-05-31, band mid 88%); AKA Films Limited (12615695, GBP -720 at 2025-05-31, band mid 88%); College Road Services Limited (12855073, GBP 100 at 2025-05-31, band mid 88%); Punch Palace Productions Limited (13933257, GBP -46,365 at 2025-05-31, band mid 88%); Punch Palace Limited (13968070, GBP 100 at 2025-05-31, band mid 88%); AENDS Limited (14229323, GBP -622,417 at 2025-05-31, band mid 62%); Little Marsh Construction Limited (15244000, GBP 24,150 at 2025-02-28, band mid 88%)) sit below the modeled balance; counted as a documented floor, not added
Phương pháp luận
We rebuild Jason’s career as a yearly time series. Disclosed salaries and documented backend enter as reported, with citations. Undisclosed lead roles get the median of disclosed salaries for their era and budget band, capped at 15% of the film’s budget. Supporting roles and roles from before the breakthrough get 2.5% of that median, the going-rate ratio measured from disclosed pre-stardom deals. Films with no reported budget are treated as small productions, and every role is estimated unless a source documents it was unpaid. Representation fees come out at sourced rates, taxes follow the eras actually lived through, spending follows measured household savings behavior unless court documents say otherwise, and what remains compounds at real market returns. Undocumented backend enters as an expected value from disclosed deals, endorsements at the median disclosed ambassador fee, and producer or director credits at union-scale floors.
Mô hình đầy đủ, mọi bảng giá và cách kiểm tra ước tính của chúng tôi so với các giao dịch thực đều có sẵn trên trang phương pháp.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is Jason Statham's net worth in 2026?
As of 2026, Jason Statham's net worth is an estimated $141.5 Million. The estimate is built film by film from disclosed salaries and documented backend, then year by year: income, minus representation fees and taxes, minus spending, compounded at real market returns.
How does Jason Statham make money?
Film salaries that climbed from $6K on his debut to disclosed $25M paydays for Meg 2 and The Beekeeper. His UK companies file publicly and are checked against the model; the register documents small production entities while the wealth sits elsewhere.
How is Jason Statham's net worth calculated?
Disclosed paydays enter as reported, with citations. Undisclosed lead roles use the median of disclosed salaries for their era and budget band, capped at 15% of the film's budget, and supporting or early-career roles use the documented pre-stardom fraction of that median. We subtract sourced representation fees, taxes for the years Jason actually worked, and spending from measured savings behavior, then compound at real market returns. Undocumented backend, endorsements, and producing credits enter as estimated lines from disclosed medians. Every rate and source is published.
How much does Jason Statham make per film?
Nó thay đổi tùy theo vai trò và thời đại, đồng thời bảng theo từng phim ở trên liệt kê mức thù lao được tính cho mỗi tựa phim. Ngày trả lương được tiết lộ nhập như đã báo cáo. Các vai diễn không được tiết lộ được mô phỏng từ những gì các diễn viên có thể so sánh kiếm được trong cùng thời đại và phạm vi ngân sách, với các vai chính sau bước đột phá kiếm được nhiều tiền nhất và các vai phụ hoặc vai phụ chỉ là một phần nhỏ trong số đó.
Tại sao thuế suất cao như vậy và các tác nhân không né tránh việc này với một công ty cho vay?
Tax comes out at the effective rate for where Jason lived each year, which is the rate shown in the year-by-year table. In a high-tax state like California, combined federal and state income tax reaches close to half of a top earner's income, so those years run in the mid-40s percent. A loan-out company, the corporation many actors run their income through, does not lower the tax on the money they take home. Its real advantage is deducting business costs such as agent, manager, and attorney fees, and the model already subtracts those as a separate line before any tax is applied. High-earning performers also fall outside the pass-through business deduction that other company owners can claim, so it buys them no rate cut.
Tại sao con số này khác với các trang web có giá trị ròng khác?
Most sites publish a single number with no way to check it. This estimate is built in the open: every salary, rate, and assumption is on the page, and the trang phương pháp lists every source.
Ước tính này chính xác đến mức nào?
Không có ước tính giá trị ròng nào cho một cá nhân là chính xác; đây là một mô hình được xây dựng từ dữ liệu công cộng. Sự khác biệt là bạn có thể xem nó được xây dựng như thế nào và kiểm tra từng bước. Mức độ tin cậy ở gần đầu phép tính cho biết con số dựa trên các con số được tiết lộ bao nhiêu và trang đánh dấu nơi con số dựa trên một giả định.
Is Jason Statham rich compared to the average person?
Yes. A net worth of $141.5 Million is far above the median American household, which sits near $193,000 according to Federal Reserve data.
What is Jason Statham's biggest source of wealth?
On this page it is film salaries, the largest line in the calculation at $239.5 Million. The full breakdown, with every other line and its source, is above.
Khám phá các diễn viên khác
Giới thiệu về NetWorth Explained
We originally created NWE because nobody in the public-figure net worth space showed their work. Magazines and sites threw out big numbers while hiding behind vague claims of “proprietary algorithms” hoặc “insider knowledge.” That’s why we started the world’s only publication that transparently showed every assumption, every variable, and every calculation. We’re still the only ones who do it this way. Đọc thêm về NetWorth Explained.