Natalie Portman Tài sản ròng 2026
Cập nhật lần cuối August 3, 2026
As of 2026, Natalie Portman has an estimated net worth of $66.8 Million, computed film by film and year by year from public records and published rates. Every input, rate, and source behind the number is on this page.
Calculation
- Mức lương được tiết lộ và phần phụ trợ được ghi lại, mỗi phần đều có trích dẫn
- Các vai trò không được tiết lộ được mô phỏng từ những vai trò có thể so sánh được tiết lộ cho thời đại, mức ngân sách và giai đoạn sự nghiệp của họ
- Phần phụ trợ, chứng thực và tạo ra các khoản tín dụng ước tính từ mức trung bình được tiết lộ
Fast Facts
| Birthdate | June 9, 1981 |
|---|---|
| Birthplace | Hadassah University Hospital, Mt. Scopus |
| Breakthrough | Léon: The Professional (1994) |
| Best Known | Black Swan (2010) |
Who Is Natalie Portman?
Natalie Portman was born June 9, 1981 in Hadassah University Hospital, Mt. Scopus, best known for Black Swan (2010). The earnings behind Natalie's net worth come from film salaries, backend participation, producing and directing fees, endorsement deals, and the Angel City FC founding stake.
The model tracks Natalie's earning years from 1994 to 2026, with the biggest single year in 2011 at about $23.8 Million of gross income. After representation fees, taxes, and living costs, what stays invested compounds at market returns into an estimated $66.8 Million today.
Data
Mỗi dòng bên dưới được tính toán từ dữ liệu công khai và bảng giá được công bố trên trang của chúng tôi trang phương pháp. Sự tự tin: hạng C. Các số liệu được ghi lại chỉ bao gồm một phần nhỏ của con số này, vì vậy hầu hết nó được mô hình hóa từ các tỷ lệ đã công bố và các điểm so sánh (các điểm chạy từ A, hầu hết được ghi lại, đến C, chủ yếu được mô hình hóa).
The Calculation
| Line | Amount |
|---|---|
| Revenue | |
| Film pay with a disclosed figure (1 of 40 films) lương mỗi phim và phụ trợ từ báo cáo được trích dẫn | $1,200,000 |
| Film pay, modeled lead roles (16 of 40 films) era and budget-band medians of disclosed lead salaries (winsorized, thin cells shrunk toward the era median), blended with this actor's disclosed quote history when available; soft breakthrough blend near the career break year | $69,160,169 |
| Film pay, modeled post-breakthrough supporting roles (1 of 40 films) 12.0% of lead cells: lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio | $583,639 |
| Film pay, modeled supporting and early roles (22 of 40 films) 2,5% mức trung bình của thời đại: tỷ lệ trước khi trở thành ngôi sao | $15,302,474 |
| Điểm phụ trợ, ước tính 12% of disclosed lead deals included points, at a median 2.6% of box office; expected value on 4 commercially viable undisclosed lead roles; cash spread over 3 years; documented-but-unquantified points use the median rate directly | $12,462,897 |
| Chứng thực, ước tính (1 quan hệ đối tác thương hiệu) 1 named partnerships x the $4.0M annual fee from the median disclosed film deal x a 4-year term, spread across the deal years | $16,000,000 |
| Producer, director, and writer credits, estimated (8 credits) union-scale floor per credit, scaled to each era; post-breakthrough lead packages use a multiple of that floor; actual packages often run higher | $6,968,208 |
| Số dư, ước tính SAG residual rates on post-theatrical receipts assumed at half of box office, split by role share and spread over the ten years after each release; 1 film(s) used band-specific box-office proxies | $15,657,221 |
| Lợi tức đầu tư từ tiền tiết kiệm mixed portfolio: 55% actual 60/40 securities returns (taxed) + 45% US long-run home-price rate on the rest | $29,738,025 |
| Los Feliz home (Laughlin Park) appreciation, estimated documented $3,250,000 purchase in 2009 (reported between $3.25M and $3.7M; lower figure used), 6.0%/yr US-CA appreciation, net 7% selling costs; the purchase itself is already counted in savings | $4,888,906 |
| Montecito estate appreciation, estimated documented $6,500,000 purchase in 2017, sold 2021 for a documented $8,000,000, actual sale price, net 7% selling costs; the purchase itself is already counted in savings (amlu.com) | $940,000 |
| Paris mansion, 7th arrondissement appreciation, estimated documented $16,500,000 purchase in 2023 (reported EUR 15.2M by Challenges via secondary coverage, converted), 4.0%/yr France appreciation, net 7% selling costs; the purchase itself is already counted in savings (graziamagazine.com) | $761,038 |
| Angel City FC founding stake equity, estimated the 2024 controlling-stake purchase valued the club at $250M; her exact founding stake was never disclosed, so a 1% non-operating co-founder share is assumed: $250,000,000 x 1% stake; 25% marketability discount applied (sportico.com) | $1,875,000 |
| Expenses | |
| Phí đại diện đại lý 10% + luật sư 5% | -$20,490,853 |
| Taxes US-CA then France then US-CA then France effective rates, year by year | -$51,507,746 |
| Chi tiêu cá nhân measured household savings rates by income, times a 88% entertainment-household factor | -$36,018,199 |
| Giá trị ròng ước tính | $66,791,855 |
Phim theo phim
| Film | Year | Role | Budget | Phòng vé | Tính lương |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May December no disclosed fee: modeled on the $21.7M shrunk median for 2020s/mid (n=1), capped at $3.0M | 2023 | Chì + P | $20,000,000 | $3,400,000 | $2,999,577 |
| Thor: Tình yêu và sấm sét disclosed: she revealed a $1.2M fee, far below her co-star's | 2022 | Supporting | $250,000,000 | $760,900,000 | $1,200,000 |
| Lucy in the Sky no disclosed fee: modeled on the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3), capped at $3.2M | 2019 | Lead | $21,400,000 | $325,950 | $3,202,743 |
| Annihilation no disclosed fee: modeled on the $20.0M shrunk median for 2010s/large (n=8), capped at $8.2M | 2018 | Lead | $55,000,000 | $43,100,000 | $8,212,763 |
| The Death & Life of John F. Donovan no disclosed fee: modeled on the $5.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid), capped at $1.4M | 2018 | Lead | $9,000,000 | $3,300,000 | $1,344,114 |
| Vox Lux no disclosed fee: modeled on the $5.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid), capped at $1.6M | 2018 | Chì + EP | $11,000,000 | $1,400,000 | $1,642,673 |
| Jackie no disclosed fee: modeled on the $5.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid), capped at $1.4M | 2016 | Lead | $9,000,000 | $36,600,000 | $1,327,967 |
| Planetarium no disclosed fee: modeled on the $5.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid), capped at $1.8M | 2016 | Lead | $12,000,000 | $530,515 | $1,769,873 |
| A Tale of Love and Darkness no disclosed fee: modeled on the $5.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid), capped at $1.8M | 2015 | Chì + D | $12,000,000 | $572,212 | $1,742,304 |
| Jane Got a Gun no disclosed fee: modeled on the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3), capped at $3.8M | 2015 | Chì + P | $25,000,000 | $3,800,000 | $3,630,303 |
| Knight of Cups no disclosed fee: modeled on the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3), capped at $3.0M | 2015 | Lead | $20,000,000 | $1,100,000 | $2,906,137 |
| The Heyday of the Insensitive Bastards no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $5.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio) | 2015 | Supporting | $15,000,000 | – | $583,639 |
| Thor: The Dark World no disclosed fee: modeled on the $20.0M shrunk median for 2010s/tentpole (n=12) | 2013 | Lead | $170,000,000 | $644,800,000 | $17,675,543 |
| No Strings Attached soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.66): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3), capped at $3.8M vs early terms | 2011 | Chì + EP | $25,000,000 | $149,200,000 | $2,571,128 |
| Thor soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.66): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $20.0M shrunk median for 2010s/tentpole (n=12) vs early terms | 2011 | Lead | $150,000,000 | $449,300,000 | $13,384,749 |
| Your Highness soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.66): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $20.0M shrunk median for 2010s/large (n=8), capped at $7.5M vs early terms | 2011 | Lead | $50,000,000 | $28,000,000 | $5,125,295 |
| Black Swan soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.50): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $5.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid), capped at $1.9M vs early terms | 2010 | Lead | $13,000,000 | $329,400,000 | $1,037,500 |
| Hesher soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.50): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $5.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid), capped at $1.1M vs early terms | 2010 | Chì + P | $7,000,000 | $449,702 | $587,500 |
| Anh em soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.34): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $19.4M shrunk median for 2000s/mid (n=2), capped at $3.9M vs early terms | 2009 | Lead | $26,000,000 | $43,500,000 | $1,643,104 |
| The Other Woman soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.34): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $18.8M median for its era and nearest band (mid), capped at $2.2M vs early terms | 2009 | Chì + EP | $15,000,000 | $1,400,000 | $1,073,028 |
| New York, I Love You soft-breakthrough supporting blend (w=0.21) | 2008 | Supporting + D | $14,000,000 | $9,700,000 | $809,043 |
| The Other Boleyn Girl soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.21): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $19.4M shrunk median for 2000s/mid (n=2), capped at $5.2M vs early terms | 2008 | Lead | $35,000,000 | $80,700,000 | $1,478,525 |
| Mr. Magorium's Wonder Emporium no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $20.0M shrunk median for 2000s/large (n=18) (pre-stardom rate); soft-breakthrough weight 0.12 | 2007 | Lead | $65,000,000 | $69,500,000 | $1,602,627 |
| My Blueberry Nights no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $18.8M median for its era and nearest band (mid) (pre-stardom rate) | 2007 | Supporting | $10,000,000 | $22,000,000 | $591,678 |
| The Darjeeling Limited no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $18.8M median for its era and nearest band (mid) (pre-stardom rate) | 2007 | Supporting | $17,500,000 | $35,000,000 | $681,080 |
| Goya's Ghosts no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $20.0M shrunk median for 2000s/large (n=18) (pre-stardom rate); soft-breakthrough weight 0.06 | 2006 | Lead | $50,000,000 | $9,448,082 | $954,784 |
| Paris, je t'aime no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $18.8M median for its era and nearest band (mid) (pre-stardom rate) | 2006 | Supporting | $13,000,000 | $17,500,000 | $564,986 |
| The Fountain no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $19.4M shrunk median for 2000s/mid (n=2) (pre-stardom rate); soft-breakthrough weight 0.06 | 2006 | Lead | $35,000,000 | $16,500,000 | $793,994 |
| Free Zone no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $18.8M median for its era and nearest band (mid) (pre-stardom rate), capped at 15% of budget; soft-breakthrough weight 0.03 | 2005 | Lead | $2,500,000 | $32,381 | $375,000 |
| V for Vendetta no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $20.0M shrunk median for 2000s/large (n=18) (pre-stardom rate); soft-breakthrough weight 0.03 | 2005 | Lead | $54,000,000 | $132,600,000 | $761,783 |
| Closer no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $19.4M shrunk median for 2000s/mid (n=2) (pre-stardom rate); soft-breakthrough weight 0.02 | 2004 | Lead | $27,000,000 | $115,500,000 | $548,507 |
| Garden State no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $18.8M median for its era and nearest band (mid) (pre-stardom rate), capped at 15% of budget; soft-breakthrough weight 0.02 | 2004 | Lead | $2,500,000 | $35,800,000 | $375,000 |
| Cold Mountain no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $20.0M shrunk median for 2000s/large (n=18) (pre-stardom rate) | 2003 | Supporting | $79,000,000 | $173,000,000 | $517,700 |
| Where the Heart Is no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $18.8M median for its era and nearest band (mid) (pre-stardom rate); soft-breakthrough weight 0.00 | 2000 | Lead | $15,000,000 | $40,000,000 | $471,014 |
| Anywhere but Here no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $14.4M shrunk median for 1990s/mid (n=6) (pre-stardom rate); soft-breakthrough weight 0.00 | 1999 | Lead | $23,000,000 | $23,600,000 | $361,393 |
| Beautiful Girls no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $14.4M shrunk median for 1990s/mid (n=6) (pre-stardom rate) | 1996 | Supporting | $26,000,000 | $10,600,000 | $359,496 |
| Everyone Says I Love You no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $14.4M shrunk median for 1990s/mid (n=6) (pre-stardom rate) | 1996 | Supporting | $20,000,000 | $9,800,000 | $359,496 |
| Mars Attacks! no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $14.6M shrunk median for 1990s/large (n=3) (pre-stardom rate) | 1996 | Supporting | $70,000,000 | $101,400,000 | $365,123 |
| Heat no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $14.6M shrunk median for 1990s/large (n=3) (pre-stardom rate) | 1995 | Supporting | $60,000,000 | $187,400,000 | $365,063 |
| Léon: The Professional no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $10.0M shrunk median for 1990s/small (n=1) (pre-stardom rate); soft-breakthrough weight 0.00 | 1994 | Lead | $16,000,000 | $46,100,000 | $250,050 |
Các số liệu được mô hình hóa hoạt động như thế nào. An undisclosed lead role after the breakthrough gets the median of disclosed lead salaries for its era and budget band, capped at 15% of the film’s budget. Supporting and pre-breakthrough roles get 2.5% of that median, the documented going rate for actors before stardom. Films with no reported budget are treated as small productions. Undocumented backend, endorsements, and producer or director credits enter as separate estimated lines in the calculation above, built from disclosed medians. Every median comes from the published tables on our trang phương pháp.
Tài sản ròng Over Time
Số dư theo mô hình vào cuối mỗi năm, phù hợp với bảng theo từng năm dưới đây.
Từng năm
| Year | Income | Phí đại diện | Thuế suất | Spent | Saved | Balance |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | $162,232 | $24,335 | 45% | $68,502 | $7,342 | $66,791,855 |
| 2025 | $167,957 | $25,194 | 45% | $70,919 | $7,601 | $57,162,039 |
| 2024 | $167,957 | $25,194 | 45% | $70,919 | $7,601 | $53,273,913 |
| 2023 | $3,720,685 | $558,103 | 45% | $958,768 | $780,652 | $49,322,326 |
| 2022 | $2,539,252 | $380,888 | 45% | $654,330 | $532,771 | $44,553,614 |
| 2021 | $811,520 | $121,728 | 45% | $255,858 | $123,528 | $47,239,507 |
| 2020 | $1,007,451 | $151,118 | 45% | $317,631 | $153,352 | $43,456,967 |
| 2019 | $3,275,848 | $491,377 | 45% | $844,140 | $687,319 | $40,308,530 |
| 2018 | $10,964,776 | $1,644,716 | 45% | $2,825,469 | $2,300,564 | $35,810,508 |
| 2017 | $4,501,592 | $675,239 | 47% | $1,117,816 | $910,152 | $33,315,382 |
| 2016 | $3,306,093 | $495,914 | 45% | $851,934 | $693,665 | $30,113,209 |
| 2015 | $11,108,724 | $1,666,309 | 45% | $2,862,563 | $2,330,766 | $27,966,037 |
| 2014 | $4,580,227 | $687,034 | 45% | $1,180,260 | $960,996 | $25,027,296 |
| 2013 | $18,547,367 | $2,782,105 | 47% | $4,605,600 | $3,749,988 | $22,681,375 |
| 2012 | $13,666,314 | $2,049,947 | 43% | $3,649,677 | $2,971,652 | $17,336,824 |
| 2011 | $23,820,362 | $3,573,054 | 43% | $6,361,380 | $5,179,585 | $13,465,918 |
| 2010 | $15,742,149 | $2,361,322 | 43% | $4,204,042 | $3,423,030 | $7,979,904 |
| 2009 | $3,004,903 | $450,735 | 43% | $802,479 | $653,397 | $4,265,513 |
| 2008 | $2,982,915 | $447,437 | 43% | $796,607 | $648,616 | $3,297,137 |
| 2007 | $2,948,319 | $442,248 | 43% | $787,368 | $641,093 | $2,911,422 |
| 2006 | $2,731,135 | $409,670 | 43% | $729,367 | $593,868 | $2,171,878 |
| 2005 | $1,686,965 | $253,045 | 43% | $450,515 | $366,820 | $1,479,628 |
| 2004 | $1,122,089 | $168,313 | 43% | $299,661 | $243,991 | $1,073,704 |
| 2003 | $749,129 | $112,369 | 43% | $244,775 | $118,177 | $786,963 |
| 2002 | $264,997 | $39,750 | 46% | $95,944 | $25,689 | $609,091 |
| 2001 | $109,687 | $16,453 | 46% | $45,473 | $4,874 | $601,526 |
| 2000 | $556,941 | $83,541 | 46% | $172,401 | $83,235 | $596,909 |
| 1999 | $433,301 | $64,995 | 46% | $134,128 | $64,757 | $505,687 |
| 1998 | $71,908 | $10,786 | 46% | $29,811 | $3,195 | $411,704 |
| 1997 | $71,908 | $10,786 | 46% | $29,811 | $3,195 | $369,588 |
| 1996 | $1,138,483 | $170,772 | 46% | $288,037 | $234,527 | $327,501 |
| 1995 | $392,446 | $58,867 | 46% | $121,482 | $58,651 | $86,176 |
| 1994 | $250,050 | $37,508 | 46% | $90,533 | $24,240 | $24,240 |
Model Notes
- salary comps: 2 disclosed lead fee(s) flagged as non-market outliers (scale / far-below-quote) and excluded from era medians
Phương pháp luận
We rebuild Natalie’s career as a yearly time series. Disclosed salaries and documented backend enter as reported, with citations. Undisclosed lead roles get the median of disclosed salaries for their era and budget band, capped at 15% of the film’s budget. Supporting roles and roles from before the breakthrough get 2.5% of that median, the going-rate ratio measured from disclosed pre-stardom deals. Films with no reported budget are treated as small productions, and every role is estimated unless a source documents it was unpaid. Representation fees come out at sourced rates, taxes follow the eras actually lived through, spending follows measured household savings behavior unless court documents say otherwise, and what remains compounds at real market returns. Undocumented backend enters as an expected value from disclosed deals, endorsements at the median disclosed ambassador fee, and producer or director credits at union-scale floors.
Mô hình đầy đủ, mọi bảng giá và cách kiểm tra ước tính của chúng tôi so với các giao dịch thực đều có sẵn trên trang phương pháp.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is Natalie Portman's net worth in 2026?
As of 2026, Natalie Portman's net worth is an estimated $66.8 Million. The estimate is built film by film from disclosed salaries and documented backend, then year by year: income, minus representation fees and taxes, minus spending, compounded at real market returns.
How does Natalie Portman make money?
Film salaries she has largely kept private: her own disclosure that Thor: Love and Thunder paid $1.2M shows how far below the comps medians her fees ran. Her Dior partnership enters at the median disclosed ambassador fee and her documented Black Swan points at the median disclosed backend rate.
How is Natalie Portman's net worth calculated?
Disclosed paydays enter as reported, with citations. Undisclosed lead roles use the median of disclosed salaries for their era and budget band, capped at 15% of the film's budget, and supporting or early-career roles use the documented pre-stardom fraction of that median. We subtract sourced representation fees, taxes for the years Natalie actually worked, and spending from measured savings behavior, then compound at real market returns. Undocumented backend, endorsements, and producing credits enter as estimated lines from disclosed medians. Every rate and source is published.
How much does Natalie Portman make per film?
Nó thay đổi tùy theo vai trò và thời đại, đồng thời bảng theo từng phim ở trên liệt kê mức thù lao được tính cho mỗi tựa phim. Ngày trả lương được tiết lộ nhập như đã báo cáo. Các vai diễn không được tiết lộ được mô phỏng từ những gì các diễn viên có thể so sánh kiếm được trong cùng thời đại và phạm vi ngân sách, với các vai chính sau bước đột phá kiếm được nhiều tiền nhất và các vai phụ hoặc vai phụ chỉ là một phần nhỏ trong số đó.
Tại sao thuế suất cao như vậy và các tác nhân không né tránh việc này với một công ty cho vay?
Tax comes out at the effective rate for where Natalie lived each year, which is the rate shown in the year-by-year table. In a high-tax state like California, combined federal and state income tax reaches close to half of a top earner's income, so those years run in the mid-40s percent. A loan-out company, the corporation many actors run their income through, does not lower the tax on the money they take home. Its real advantage is deducting business costs such as agent, manager, and attorney fees, and the model already subtracts those as a separate line before any tax is applied. High-earning performers also fall outside the pass-through business deduction that other company owners can claim, so it buys them no rate cut.
Tại sao con số này khác với các trang web có giá trị ròng khác?
Most sites publish a single number with no way to check it. This estimate is built in the open: every salary, rate, and assumption is on the page, and the trang phương pháp lists every source.
Ước tính này chính xác đến mức nào?
Không có ước tính giá trị ròng nào cho một cá nhân là chính xác; đây là một mô hình được xây dựng từ dữ liệu công cộng. Sự khác biệt là bạn có thể xem nó được xây dựng như thế nào và kiểm tra từng bước. Mức độ tin cậy ở gần đầu phép tính cho biết con số dựa trên các con số được tiết lộ bao nhiêu và trang đánh dấu nơi con số dựa trên một giả định.
Is Natalie Portman rich compared to the average person?
Yes. A net worth of $66.8 Million is far above the median American household, which sits near $193,000 according to Federal Reserve data.
What is Natalie Portman's biggest source of wealth?
On this page it is film salaries, the largest line in the calculation at $69.2 Million. The full breakdown, with every other line and its source, is above.
How much does Natalie Portman make from endorsements?
The model counts $16.0 Million in career endorsement income for Natalie: 1 named partnerships x the $4.0M annual fee from the median disclosed film deal x a 4-year term, spread across the deal years. It is an estimate, since the individual deal values are not all public, and it sits as its own line in the calculation above.
What businesses does Natalie Portman own?
The stake counted on this page is Angel City FC founding stake. It is valued from a reported transaction or a revenue multiple, and shown as its own line in the calculation above with the basis next to it.
Khám phá các diễn viên khác
Giới thiệu về NetWorth Explained
We originally created NWE because nobody in the public-figure net worth space showed their work. Magazines and sites threw out big numbers while hiding behind vague claims of “proprietary algorithms” hoặc “insider knowledge.” That’s why we started the world’s only publication that transparently showed every assumption, every variable, and every calculation. We’re still the only ones who do it this way. Đọc thêm về NetWorth Explained.