Leonardo DiCaprio Tài sản ròng 2026
Cập nhật lần cuối August 3, 2026
As of 2026, Leonardo DiCaprio has an estimated net worth of $268.3 Million, computed film by film and year by year from public records and published rates. Every input, rate, and source behind the number is on this page.
Calculation
- Mức lương được tiết lộ và phần phụ trợ được ghi lại, mỗi phần đều có trích dẫn
- Các vai trò không được tiết lộ được mô phỏng từ những vai trò có thể so sánh được tiết lộ cho thời đại, mức ngân sách và giai đoạn sự nghiệp của họ
- Phần phụ trợ, chứng thực và tạo ra các khoản tín dụng ước tính từ mức trung bình được tiết lộ
Fast Facts
| Birthdate | November 11, 1974 |
|---|---|
| Birthplace | Los Angeles |
| Breakthrough | What's Eating Gilbert Grape (1993) |
| Best Known | Titanic (1997) |
Who Is Leonardo DiCaprio?
Leonardo DiCaprio was born November 11, 1974 in Los Angeles, best known for Titanic (1997). The earnings behind Leonardo's net worth come from film salaries, backend participation, and endorsement deals.
The model tracks Leonardo's earning years from 1990 to 2026, with the biggest single year in 1997 at about $41.8 Million of gross income. After representation fees, taxes, and living costs, what stays invested compounds at market returns into an estimated $268.3 Million today.
Data
Mỗi dòng bên dưới được tính toán từ dữ liệu công khai và bảng giá được công bố trên trang của chúng tôi trang phương pháp. Sự tự tin: hạng B. Các con số được ghi trong tài liệu chiếm một phần khá lớn trong con số này và các tỷ lệ được công bố mô hình hóa phần còn lại (các điểm chạy từ A, hầu hết được ghi lại, đến C, hầu hết được mô hình hóa).
The Calculation
| Line | Amount |
|---|---|
| Revenue | |
| Film pay with a disclosed figure (6 of 32 films) lương mỗi phim và phụ trợ từ báo cáo được trích dẫn | $160,000,000 |
| Film pay, modeled lead roles (18 of 32 films) era and budget-band medians of disclosed lead salaries (winsorized, thin cells shrunk toward the era median), blended with this actor's disclosed quote history when available; soft breakthrough blend near the career break year | $246,609,462 |
| Film pay, modeled post-breakthrough supporting roles (2 of 32 films) 12.0% of lead cells: lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio | $1,601,780 |
| Film pay, modeled supporting and early roles (6 of 32 films) 2,5% mức trung bình của thời đại: tỷ lệ trước khi trở thành ngôi sao | $3,517,943 |
| Điểm phụ trợ, ước tính 12% of disclosed lead deals included points, at a median 2.6% of box office; expected value on 16 commercially viable undisclosed lead roles; cash spread over 3 years | $13,857,430 |
| Chứng thực, ước tính (2 quan hệ đối tác thương hiệu) per-deal schedule: OPPO $5.0M/yr 2011-2011 | $5,000,000 |
| Số dư, ước tính SAG residual rates on post-theatrical receipts assumed at half of box office, split by role share and spread over the ten years after each release; 1 film(s) used band-specific box-office proxies | $46,464,141 |
| Lợi tức đầu tư từ tiền tiết kiệm mixed portfolio: 55% actual 60/40 securities returns (taxed) + 45% US long-run home-price rate on the rest | $138,145,981 |
| Bird Streets neighbor buyout appreciation, estimated documented $10,500,000 purchase in 2022, 6.0%/yr US-CA appreciation, net 7% selling costs; the purchase itself is already counted in savings (therealdeal.com) | $1,828,088 |
| Palm Springs midcentury (Dinah Shore house) appreciation, estimated documented $5,200,000 purchase in 2014, 6.0%/yr US-CA appreciation, net 7% selling costs; the purchase itself is already counted in savings (hollywoodreporter.com) | $4,530,982 |
| Malibu beach bungalow appreciation, estimated documented $1,700,000 purchase in 1998, sold 2021 for a documented $10,300,000, actual sale price, net 7% selling costs; the purchase itself is already counted in savings | $7,879,000 |
| Blue Whale Estates oceanfront, Malibu appreciation, estimated documented $13,800,000 purchase in 2021, 6.0%/yr US-CA appreciation, net 7% selling costs; the purchase itself is already counted in savings | $3,374,787 |
| Red Oak Manor, Los Feliz (from Moby) appreciation, estimated documented $4,190,000 purchase in 2018, sold 2022 for a documented $4,900,000, actual sale price, net 7% selling costs; the purchase itself is already counted in savings (forbes.com) | $367,000 |
| Los Feliz Spanish Colonial appreciation, estimated documented $7,100,000 purchase in 2021, 6.0%/yr US-CA appreciation, net 7% selling costs; the purchase itself is already counted in savings (manofmany.com) | $1,736,303 |
| Blackadore Caye island, Belize appreciation, estimated documented $1,750,000 purchase in 2005, 4.0%/yr Belize appreciation, net 7% selling costs; the purchase itself is already counted in savings (vi.wikipedia.org) | $1,958,695 |
| Bird Streets home (from Madonna) appreciation, estimated documented $2,500,000 purchase in 1999, 6.0%/yr US-CA appreciation, net 7% selling costs; the purchase itself is already counted in savings | $8,711,954 |
| Beverly Hills traditional appreciation, estimated documented $9,900,000 purchase in 2021, 6.0%/yr US-CA appreciation, net 7% selling costs; the purchase itself is already counted in savings (therealdeal.com) | $2,421,043 |
| Expenses | |
| Phí đại diện đại lý 10% + luật sư 5% | -$71,200,914 |
| Taxes Tỷ lệ hiệu quả của US-CA, theo từng năm | -$180,371,595 |
| Chi tiêu cá nhân measured household savings rates by income, times a 88% entertainment-household factor | -$123,221,399 |
| Greenwich Village eco condo sale result, documented documented $10,000,000 purchase in 2014, sold 2016 for a documented $8,000,000, actual sale price, net 7% selling costs; the purchase itself is already counted in savings (therealdeal.com) | -$2,560,000 |
| Giá trị ròng ước tính | $268,272,686 |
Phim theo phim
| Film | Year | Role | Budget | Phòng vé | Tính lương |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| One Battle After Another disclosed: reported $20M for the Paul Thomas Anderson film | 2025 | Lead | $130,000,000 | $196,000,000 | $20,000,000 |
| Killers of the Flower Moon disclosed: reported $30M (some later reports put it at $40M; earlier trade figure used and the range is noted) | 2023 | Lead | $200,000,000 | $158,800,000 | $30,000,000 |
| Don't Look Up disclosed: Variety: $30M streaming salary (Lawrence $25M on the same film) | 2021 | Lead | $75,000,000 | $791,863 | $30,000,000 |
| Once Upon a Time in Hollywood no disclosed fee: modeled on the $20.0M shrunk median for 2010s/large (n=8); blended 75% with this actor's disclosed quote history ($20.0M personal, n=1); cap raised to similar-budget personal max within 50% of budget ($20.0M) | 2019 | Lead | $96,000,000 | $374,600,000 | $19,999,996 |
| The Revenant disclosed: reported $20M | 2015 | Lead | $135,000,000 | $533,000,000 | $20,000,000 |
| The Great Gatsby no disclosed fee: modeled on the $20.0M shrunk median for 2010s/tentpole (n=12) | 2013 | Lead | $190,000,000 | $353,600,000 | $19,999,767 |
| The Wolf of Wall Street no disclosed fee: modeled on the $20.0M shrunk median for 2010s/tentpole (n=12), capped at $15.0M | 2013 | Lead | $100,000,000 | $406,000,000 | $14,999,826 |
| Django Unchained no disclosed fee: modeled on the $20.0M shrunk median for 2010s/tentpole (n=12), capped at $15.0M | 2012 | Lead | $100,000,000 | $425,400,000 | $14,999,662 |
| J. Edgar no disclosed fee: modeled on the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3), capped at $5.2M | 2011 | Lead | $35,000,000 | $84,900,000 | $5,249,774 |
| Hubble no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $5.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio) | 2010 | Supporting | $15,000,000 | $73,600,000 | $599,958 |
| Kẻ Đánh Cắp Giấc Mơ no disclosed fee: modeled on the $20.0M shrunk median for 2010s/tentpole (n=12) | 2010 | Lead | $160,000,000 | $836,800,000 | $19,998,276 |
| Shutter Island no disclosed fee: modeled on the $20.0M shrunk median for 2010s/large (n=8), capped at $12.0M | 2010 | Lead | $80,000,000 | $294,800,000 | $11,998,983 |
| Body of Lies no disclosed fee: modeled on the $20.0M shrunk median for 2000s/large (n=18); blended 75% with this actor's disclosed quote history ($20.0M personal, n=1); cap raised to similar-budget personal max within 50% of budget ($20.0M) | 2008 | Lead | $70,000,000 | $118,600,000 | $19,993,461 |
| Revolutionary Road no disclosed fee: modeled on the $19.4M shrunk median for 2000s/mid (n=2); blended 75% with this actor's disclosed quote history ($20.0M personal, n=1); cap raised to similar-budget personal max within 50% of budget ($17.5M), capped at $17.5M | 2008 | Lead | $35,000,000 | $76,000,000 | $17,494,294 |
| Blood Diamond no disclosed fee: modeled on the $11.8M shrunk median for 2000s/tentpole (n=9); blended 75% with this actor's disclosed quote history ($20.0M personal, n=1); cap raised to similar-budget personal max within 50% of budget ($20.0M) | 2006 | Lead | $100,000,000 | $171,700,000 | $17,932,100 |
| The Departed no disclosed fee: modeled on the $20.0M shrunk median for 2000s/large (n=18); blended 75% with this actor's disclosed quote history ($20.0M personal, n=1); cap raised to similar-budget personal max within 50% of budget ($20.0M) | 2006 | Lead | $90,000,000 | $291,500,000 | $19,975,215 |
| The Aviator no disclosed fee: modeled on the $11.8M shrunk median for 2000s/tentpole (n=9); blended 75% with this actor's disclosed quote history ($20.0M personal, n=1), capped at $16.5M | 2004 | Lead | $110,000,000 | $213,700,000 | $16,422,141 |
| Catch Me If You Can no disclosed fee: modeled on the $20.0M shrunk median for 2000s/large (n=18); blended 75% with this actor's disclosed quote history ($20.0M personal, n=1); cap raised to similar-budget personal max within 50% of budget ($20.0M) | 2002 | Lead | $52,000,000 | $352,100,000 | $19,649,269 |
| Gangs of New York no disclosed fee: modeled on the $11.8M shrunk median for 2000s/tentpole (n=9); blended 75% with this actor's disclosed quote history ($20.0M personal, n=1); cap raised to similar-budget personal max within 50% of budget ($20.0M) | 2002 | Lead | $100,000,000 | $193,800,000 | $17,636,925 |
| Don's Plum no disclosed fee: modeled on the $18.8M median for its era and nearest band (mid); personal blend cut to 18% on a smaller-than-usual budget; blended 18% with this actor's disclosed quote history ($20.0M personal, n=1); cap raised to similar-budget personal max within 50% of budget ($3.0M), capped at $3.0M | 2001 | Lead | $6,000,000 | $5,661 | $2,912,811 |
| The Beach disclosed: post-Titanic $20M quote, widely reported | 2000 | Lead | $50,000,000 | $144,100,000 | $20,000,000 |
| Celebrity soft-breakthrough supporting blend (w=0.79) | 1998 | Supporting | $12,000,000 | $5,100,000 | $1,001,822 |
| The Man in the Iron Mask soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.79): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $14.4M shrunk median for 1990s/mid (n=6), capped at $5.2M vs early terms | 1998 | Lead | $35,000,000 | $183,000,000 | $4,229,774 |
| Titanic disclosed: $2.5M upfront (pre-stardom casting) plus negotiated 1.8% of gross; total widely reported ~$40M as the film passed $2B | 1997 | Lead | $200,000,000 | $2,202,000,000 | $40,000,000 |
| Marvin's Room soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.50): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $14.4M shrunk median for 1990s/mid (n=6), capped at $3.5M vs early terms | 1996 | Lead | $23,000,000 | $12,800,000 | $1,904,688 |
| Romeo + Juliet soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.50): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $10.0M shrunk median for 1990s/small (n=1), capped at $2.2M vs early terms | 1996 | Lead | $14,500,000 | $147,600,000 | $1,212,500 |
| The Basketball Diaries soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.34): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $10.0M shrunk median for 1990s/small (n=1), capped at $1.2M vs early terms | 1995 | Lead | $8,000,000 | $2,400,000 | $572,281 |
| The Quick and the Dead soft-breakthrough supporting blend (w=0.34) | 1995 | Supporting | $35,000,000 | $47,000,000 | $822,655 |
| Total Eclipse soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.34): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $10.0M shrunk median for 1990s/small (n=1), capped at $1.2M vs early terms | 1995 | Lead | $7,992,942 | $340,139 | $571,922 |
| This Boy's Life no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $14.4M shrunk median for 1990s/mid (n=6) (pre-stardom rate); soft-breakthrough weight 0.12 | 1993 | Lead | $26,000,000 | $4,000,000 | $781,428 |
| What's Eating Gilbert Grape no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $10.0M shrunk median for 1990s/small (n=1) (pre-stardom rate) | 1993 | Supporting | $11,000,000 | $10,000,000 | $363,243 |
| Critters 3 no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $14.4M shrunk median for 1990s/mid (n=6) (pre-stardom rate) | 1991 | Supporting | $26,000,000 | – | $406,414 |
Các số liệu được mô hình hóa hoạt động như thế nào. An undisclosed lead role after the breakthrough gets the median of disclosed lead salaries for its era and budget band, capped at 15% of the film’s budget. Supporting and pre-breakthrough roles get 2.5% of that median, the documented going rate for actors before stardom. Films with no reported budget are treated as small productions. Undocumented backend, endorsements, and producer or director credits enter as separate estimated lines in the calculation above, built from disclosed medians. Every median comes from the published tables on our trang phương pháp.
Tài sản ròng Over Time
Số dư theo mô hình vào cuối mỗi năm, phù hợp với bảng theo từng năm dưới đây.
Từng năm
| Year | Income | Phí đại diện | Thuế suất | Spent | Saved | Balance |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | $433,734 | $65,060 | 45% | $159,945 | $42,825 | $268,272,686 |
| 2025 | $20,633,912 | $3,095,087 | 45% | $5,317,070 | $4,329,284 | $233,258,523 |
| 2024 | $633,912 | $95,087 | 45% | $199,861 | $96,493 | $213,385,991 |
| 2023 | $30,990,787 | $4,648,618 | 45% | $7,985,892 | $6,502,301 | $197,496,951 |
| 2022 | $1,243,475 | $186,521 | 45% | $392,045 | $189,279 | $175,303,014 |
| 2021 | $31,675,905 | $4,751,386 | 45% | $8,162,437 | $6,646,048 | $187,917,493 |
| 2020 | $2,358,673 | $353,801 | 45% | $607,797 | $494,883 | $167,193,964 |
| 2019 | $16,136,158 | $2,420,424 | 45% | $4,158,062 | $3,385,592 | $155,169,376 |
| 2018 | $7,869,283 | $1,180,392 | 45% | $2,027,804 | $1,651,086 | $137,185,467 |
| 2017 | $1,869,284 | $280,393 | 47% | $464,172 | $377,940 | $134,747,456 |
| 2016 | $2,144,425 | $321,664 | 47% | $532,494 | $433,569 | $124,865,561 |
| 2015 | $22,603,380 | $3,390,507 | 47% | $5,612,772 | $4,570,051 | $118,284,284 |
| 2014 | $3,164,655 | $474,698 | 47% | $785,833 | $639,844 | $111,017,345 |
| 2013 | $27,299,852 | $4,094,978 | 47% | $6,778,979 | $5,519,604 | $104,025,692 |
| 2012 | $24,251,170 | $3,637,675 | 43% | $6,476,430 | $5,273,262 | $90,209,064 |
| 2011 | $15,941,505 | $2,391,226 | 43% | $4,257,281 | $3,466,378 | $79,618,855 |
| 2010 | $26,674,580 | $4,001,187 | 43% | $7,123,617 | $5,800,217 | $73,336,361 |
| 2009 | $10,905,388 | $1,635,808 | 43% | $2,912,354 | $2,371,307 | $63,217,962 |
| 2008 | $27,834,426 | $4,175,164 | 43% | $7,433,362 | $6,052,418 | $55,540,776 |
| 2007 | $13,948,624 | $2,092,294 | 43% | $3,725,069 | $3,033,039 | $54,400,745 |
| 2006 | $29,275,745 | $4,391,362 | 43% | $7,818,275 | $6,365,823 | $49,140,182 |
| 2005 | $13,648,283 | $2,047,242 | 43% | $3,644,861 | $2,967,732 | $40,107,557 |
| 2004 | $14,202,018 | $2,130,303 | 43% | $3,792,740 | $3,088,138 | $35,834,725 |
| 2003 | $7,418,788 | $1,112,818 | 43% | $1,981,235 | $1,613,168 | $31,059,364 |
| 2002 | $28,268,217 | $4,240,233 | 46% | $7,151,881 | $5,823,230 | $26,817,877 |
| 2001 | $14,841,876 | $2,226,281 | 46% | $3,755,006 | $3,057,414 | $21,646,867 |
| 2000 | $22,592,142 | $3,388,821 | 46% | $5,715,830 | $4,653,963 | $18,597,449 |
| 1999 | $1,718,299 | $257,745 | 46% | $434,731 | $353,968 | $13,726,673 |
| 1998 | $5,421,680 | $813,252 | 46% | $1,371,689 | $1,116,862 | $12,486,332 |
| 1997 | $41,834,210 | $6,275,131 | 46% | $10,584,088 | $8,617,814 | $10,286,251 |
| 1996 | $2,351,484 | $352,723 | 46% | $594,927 | $484,404 | $1,491,334 |
| 1995 | $2,322,314 | $348,347 | 46% | $587,547 | $478,395 | $933,305 |
| 1994 | $600,414 | $90,062 | 46% | $185,858 | $89,732 | $400,619 |
| 1993 | $807,810 | $121,172 | 46% | $204,377 | $166,408 | $305,342 |
| 1992 | $349,942 | $52,491 | 36% | $128,384 | $61,984 | $131,248 |
| 1991 | $284,490 | $42,673 | 36% | $104,372 | $50,391 | $66,014 |
| 1990 | $121,924 | $18,289 | 36% | $52,319 | $14,008 | $14,008 |
Model Notes
- salary comps: 2 disclosed lead fee(s) flagged as non-market outliers (scale / far-below-quote) and excluded from era medians
Phương pháp luận
We rebuild Leonardo’s career as a yearly time series. Disclosed salaries and documented backend enter as reported, with citations. Undisclosed lead roles get the median of disclosed salaries for their era and budget band, capped at 15% of the film’s budget. Supporting roles and roles from before the breakthrough get 2.5% of that median, the going-rate ratio measured from disclosed pre-stardom deals. Films with no reported budget are treated as small productions, and every role is estimated unless a source documents it was unpaid. Representation fees come out at sourced rates, taxes follow the eras actually lived through, spending follows measured household savings behavior unless court documents say otherwise, and what remains compounds at real market returns. Undocumented backend enters as an expected value from disclosed deals, endorsements at the median disclosed ambassador fee, and producer or director credits at union-scale floors.
Mô hình đầy đủ, mọi bảng giá và cách kiểm tra ước tính của chúng tôi so với các giao dịch thực đều có sẵn trên trang phương pháp.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is Leonardo DiCaprio's net worth in 2026?
As of 2026, Leonardo DiCaprio's net worth is an estimated $268.3 Million. The estimate is built film by film from disclosed salaries and documented backend, then year by year: income, minus representation fees and taxes, minus spending, compounded at real market returns.
How does Leonardo DiCaprio make money?
Film salaries and backend participation, including a disclosed 1.8% of gross on Titanic worth about $40M and reported $20-30M paydays since. Undisclosed backend enters as an expected-value estimate; his production company stays queued until amounts are documented.
How is Leonardo DiCaprio's net worth calculated?
Disclosed paydays enter as reported, with citations. Undisclosed lead roles use the median of disclosed salaries for their era and budget band, capped at 15% of the film's budget, and supporting or early-career roles use the documented pre-stardom fraction of that median. We subtract sourced representation fees, taxes for the years Leonardo actually worked, and spending from measured savings behavior, then compound at real market returns. Undocumented backend, endorsements, and producing credits enter as estimated lines from disclosed medians. Every rate and source is published.
How much does Leonardo DiCaprio make per film?
Nó thay đổi tùy theo vai trò và thời đại, đồng thời bảng theo từng phim ở trên liệt kê mức thù lao được tính cho mỗi tựa phim. Ngày trả lương được tiết lộ nhập như đã báo cáo. Các vai diễn không được tiết lộ được mô phỏng từ những gì các diễn viên có thể so sánh kiếm được trong cùng thời đại và phạm vi ngân sách, với các vai chính sau bước đột phá kiếm được nhiều tiền nhất và các vai phụ hoặc vai phụ chỉ là một phần nhỏ trong số đó.
Tại sao thuế suất cao như vậy và các tác nhân không né tránh việc này với một công ty cho vay?
Tax comes out at the effective rate for where Leonardo lived each year, which is the rate shown in the year-by-year table. In a high-tax state like California, combined federal and state income tax reaches close to half of a top earner's income, so those years run in the mid-40s percent. A loan-out company, the corporation many actors run their income through, does not lower the tax on the money they take home. Its real advantage is deducting business costs such as agent, manager, and attorney fees, and the model already subtracts those as a separate line before any tax is applied. High-earning performers also fall outside the pass-through business deduction that other company owners can claim, so it buys them no rate cut.
Tại sao con số này khác với các trang web có giá trị ròng khác?
Most sites publish a single number with no way to check it. This estimate is built in the open: every salary, rate, and assumption is on the page, and the trang phương pháp lists every source.
Ước tính này chính xác đến mức nào?
Không có ước tính giá trị ròng nào cho một cá nhân là chính xác; đây là một mô hình được xây dựng từ dữ liệu công cộng. Sự khác biệt là bạn có thể xem nó được xây dựng như thế nào và kiểm tra từng bước. Mức độ tin cậy ở gần đầu phép tính cho biết con số dựa trên các con số được tiết lộ bao nhiêu và trang đánh dấu nơi con số dựa trên một giả định.
Is Leonardo DiCaprio rich compared to the average person?
Yes. A net worth of $268.3 Million is far above the median American household, which sits near $193,000 according to Federal Reserve data.
What is Leonardo DiCaprio's biggest source of wealth?
On this page it is film salaries, the largest line in the calculation at $246.6 Million. The full breakdown, with every other line and its source, is above.
How much does Leonardo DiCaprio make from endorsements?
The model counts $5.0 Million in career endorsement income for Leonardo: per-deal schedule: OPPO $5.0M/yr 2011-2011. It is an estimate, since the individual deal values are not all public, and it sits as its own line in the calculation above.
Khám phá các diễn viên khác
Giới thiệu về NetWorth Explained
We originally created NWE because nobody in the public-figure net worth space showed their work. Magazines and sites threw out big numbers while hiding behind vague claims of “proprietary algorithms” hoặc “insider knowledge.” That’s why we started the world’s only publication that transparently showed every assumption, every variable, and every calculation. We’re still the only ones who do it this way. Đọc thêm về NetWorth Explained.