Jennifer Garner Tài sản ròng 2026
Cập nhật lần cuối August 3, 2026
As of 2026, Jennifer Garner has an estimated net worth of $135.9 Million, computed film by film and year by year from public records and published rates. Every input, rate, and source behind the number is on this page.
Calculation
- Mức lương được tiết lộ và phần phụ trợ được ghi lại, mỗi phần đều có trích dẫn
- Các vai trò không được tiết lộ được mô phỏng từ những vai trò có thể so sánh được tiết lộ cho thời đại, mức ngân sách và giai đoạn sự nghiệp của họ
- Phần phụ trợ, chứng thực và tạo ra các khoản tín dụng ước tính từ mức trung bình được tiết lộ
Fast Facts
| Birthdate | April 17, 1972 |
|---|---|
| Birthplace | Houston |
| Breakthrough | Alias (2001) |
| Best Known | 13 Going on 30 (2004) |
Who Is Jennifer Garner?
Jennifer Garner was born April 17, 1972 in Houston, best known for 13 Going on 30 (2004). The earnings behind Jennifer's net worth come from film salaries, backend participation, producing and directing fees, endorsement deals, and the Once Upon a Farm stake.
The model tracks Jennifer's earning years from 1996 to 2026, with the biggest single year in 2007 at about $17.9 Million of gross income. After representation fees, taxes, and living costs, what stays invested compounds at market returns into an estimated $135.9 Million today.
Data
Mỗi dòng bên dưới được tính toán từ dữ liệu công khai và bảng giá được công bố trên trang của chúng tôi trang phương pháp. Sự tự tin: hạng C. Các số liệu được ghi lại chỉ bao gồm một phần nhỏ của con số này, vì vậy hầu hết nó được mô hình hóa từ các tỷ lệ đã công bố và các điểm so sánh (các điểm chạy từ A, hầu hết được ghi lại, đến C, chủ yếu được mô hình hóa).
The Calculation
| Line | Amount |
|---|---|
| Revenue | |
| Film pay, modeled lead roles (21 of 35 films) era and budget-band medians of disclosed lead salaries (winsorized, thin cells shrunk toward the era median), blended with this actor's disclosed quote history when available; soft breakthrough blend near the career break year | $79,249,653 |
| Film pay, modeled post-breakthrough supporting roles (7 of 35 films) 12.0% of lead cells: lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio | $10,302,326 |
| Film pay, modeled supporting and early roles (7 of 35 films) 2,5% mức trung bình của thời đại: tỷ lệ trước khi trở thành ngôi sao | $7,438,700 |
| Điểm phụ trợ, ước tính 12% of disclosed lead deals included points, at a median 2.6% of box office; expected value on 14 commercially viable undisclosed lead roles; cash spread over 3 years; documented-but-unquantified points use the median rate directly; 1 film(s) used band-specific box-office/budget multiples as a gross proxy | $8,955,294 |
| Chứng thực, ước tính (2 quan hệ đối tác thương hiệu) 2 named partnerships x the $4.0M annual fee from the median disclosed film deal x a 4-year term, spread across the deal years | $32,000,000 |
| Producer, director, and writer credits, estimated (3 credits) union-scale floor per credit, scaled to each era; post-breakthrough lead packages use a multiple of that floor; actual packages often run higher | $3,216,096 |
| Số dư, ước tính SAG residual rates on post-theatrical receipts assumed at half of box office, split by role share and spread over the ten years after each release; 3 film(s) used band-specific box-office proxies | $9,931,822 |
| Alias salary (2001-2005) Variety covered her mid-run raise; the series is booked from a reported $45K per episode early to $150K by the final season, interpolated between the documented endpoints (đa dạng.com) | $10,800,000 |
| Lợi tức đầu tư từ tiền tiết kiệm mixed portfolio: 55% actual 60/40 securities returns (taxed) + 45% US long-run home-price rate on the rest | $43,567,455 |
| Brentwood Park home appreciation, estimated documented $7,900,000 purchase in 2019, 6.0%/yr US-CA appreciation, net 7% selling costs; the purchase itself is already counted in savings | $3,147,172 |
| First Brentwood marital home appreciation, estimated documented $5,500,000 purchase in 2004, sold 2025 for a documented $10,800,000, actual sale price, net 7% selling costs; the purchase itself is already counted in savings (hellomagazine.com) | $4,544,000 |
| Once Upon a Farm stake equity, estimated co-founded 2017 with a documented 7% stake; the February 2026 IPO priced the company at $724M and Forbes valued her stake at $64M on the first trading day; $724,000,000 x 7% stake (forbes.com) | $50,680,000 |
| Expenses | |
| Phí đại diện đại lý 10% + luật sư 5% | -$24,118,160 |
| Taxes Tỷ lệ hiệu quả của US-CA, theo từng năm | -$60,309,267 |
| Chi tiêu cá nhân measured household savings rates by income, times a 88% entertainment-household factor | -$42,439,741 |
| Giá trị ròng ước tính | $135,859,189 |
Phim theo phim
| Film | Year | Role | Budget | Phòng vé | Tính lương |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Family Switch no disclosed fee: modeled on the $23.8M shrunk median for 2020s/large (n=2), capped at $10.5M | 2023 | Chì + P | $70,000,000 | – | $10,499,969 |
| The Adam Project no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $16.4M shrunk median for 2020s/tentpole (n=5) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio) | 2022 | Supporting | $116,000,000 | – | $1,971,419 |
| Yes Day no disclosed fee: modeled on the $25.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid), capped at $0.9M | 2021 | Chì + P | $6,000,000 | $2,000,000 | $899,997 |
| Wonder Park no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $20.0M shrunk median for 2010s/tentpole (n=12) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio) | 2019 | Supporting | $100,000,000 | $119,600,000 | $2,399,914 |
| Love, Simon no disclosed fee: modeled on the $5.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid), capped at $2.5M | 2018 | Lead | $17,000,000 | $66,300,000 | $2,549,786 |
| Peppermint no disclosed fee: modeled on the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3), capped at $3.8M | 2018 | Lead | $25,000,000 | $53,900,000 | $3,749,693 |
| A Happening of Monumental Proportions no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $5.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio) | 2017 | Supporting | $6,000,000 | $850,000 | $599,918 |
| The Tribes of Palos Verdes no disclosed fee: modeled on the $5.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid), capped at $0.8M | 2017 | Lead | $5,000,000 | $11,603 | $749,892 |
| Miracles from Heaven no disclosed fee: modeled on the $5.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid), capped at $2.1M | 2016 | Lead | $14,000,000 | $74,000,000 | $2,099,338 |
| Mother's Day no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio) | 2016 | Supporting | $25,000,000 | $48,800,000 | $1,319,650 |
| Nine Lives no disclosed fee: modeled on the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3), capped at $4.5M | 2016 | Lead | $30,000,000 | $57,800,000 | $4,498,583 |
| Wakefield no disclosed fee: modeled on the $5.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid), capped at $0.6M | 2016 | Lead | $4,000,000 | $874,187 | $599,841 |
| Danny Collins no disclosed fee: modeled on the $5.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid), capped at $1.5M | 2015 | Lead | $10,000,000 | $10,800,000 | $1,499,102 |
| Alexander and the Terrible, Horrible, No Good, Very Bad Day no disclosed fee: modeled on the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3), capped at $4.2M | 2014 | Lead | $28,000,000 | $100,600,000 | $4,195,011 |
| Draft Day no disclosed fee: modeled on the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3), capped at $3.8M | 2014 | Lead | $25,000,000 | $29,500,000 | $3,745,583 |
| Men, Women & Children no disclosed fee: modeled on the $5.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid), capped at $2.4M | 2014 | Lead | $16,000,000 | $2,200,000 | $2,397,108 |
| Dallas Buyers Club no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $5.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio) | 2013 | Supporting | $5,000,000 | $55,700,000 | $598,826 |
| The Odd Life of Timothy Green no disclosed fee: modeled on the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3), capped at $3.8M | 2012 | Lead | $25,000,000 | $56,000,000 | $3,733,303 |
| Arthur no disclosed fee: modeled on the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3), capped at $6.0M | 2011 | Lead | $40,000,000 | $48,100,000 | $5,946,666 |
| Butter no disclosed fee: modeled on the $5.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid), capped at $1.6M | 2011 | Chì + P | $10,800,000 | $175,706 | $1,606,073 |
| Valentine's Day no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $20.0M shrunk median for 2010s/large (n=8) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio) | 2010 | Supporting | $52,000,000 | $216,500,000 | $2,365,826 |
| Ghosts of Girlfriends Past no disclosed fee: modeled on the $19.4M shrunk median for 2000s/mid (n=2), capped at $5.6M | 2009 | Lead | $37,500,000 | $102,400,000 | $5,447,930 |
| The Invention of Lying no disclosed fee: modeled on the $18.8M median for its era and nearest band (mid), capped at $2.8M | 2009 | Lead | $18,500,000 | $32,700,000 | $2,695,561 |
| Juno no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $18.8M median for its era and nearest band (mid) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio), capped at 15% of budget | 2007 | Supporting | $7,500,000 | $231,400,000 | $1,046,773 |
| The Kingdom no disclosed fee: modeled on the $20.0M shrunk median for 2000s/large (n=18), capped at $10.9M | 2007 | Lead | $72,500,000 | $87,000,000 | $9,638,270 |
| Catch and Release soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.79): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $19.4M shrunk median for 2000s/mid (n=2), capped at $3.8M vs early terms | 2006 | Lead | $25,000,000 | $16,000,000 | $3,068,763 |
| Elektra soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.66): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $20.0M shrunk median for 2000s/large (n=18), capped at $9.8M vs early terms | 2005 | Lead | $65,000,000 | $57,000,000 | $6,611,996 |
| 13 Going on 30 soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.50): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $19.4M shrunk median for 2000s/mid (n=2), capped at $5.5M vs early terms | 2004 | Lead | $37,000,000 | $96,500,000 | $3,017,188 |
| Daredevil soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.34): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $20.0M shrunk median for 2000s/large (n=18), capped at $11.7M vs early terms | 2003 | Lead | $78,000,000 | $179,200,000 | $4,299,529 |
| Pearl Harbor no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $11.8M shrunk median for 2000s/tentpole (n=9) (pre-stardom rate) | 2001 | Supporting | $140,000,000 | $449,200,000 | $429,287 |
| Stealing Time no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $19.4M shrunk median for 2000s/mid (n=2) (pre-stardom rate); soft-breakthrough weight 0.12 | 2001 | Lead | $40,000,000 | – | $1,141,854 |
| Dude, Where's My Car? no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $18.8M median for its era and nearest band (mid) (pre-stardom rate) | 2000 | Supporting | $13,000,000 | $73,200,000 | $564,986 |
| Deconstructing Harry no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $14.4M shrunk median for 1990s/mid (n=6) (pre-stardom rate) | 1997 | Supporting | $20,000,000 | $10,600,000 | $372,097 |
| Mr. Magoo no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $14.4M shrunk median for 1990s/mid (n=6) (pre-stardom rate) | 1997 | Supporting | $30,000,000 | $28,900,000 | $372,097 |
| Washington Square no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $10.0M shrunk median for 1990s/small (n=1) (pre-stardom rate) | 1997 | Supporting | $15,000,000 | $1,900,000 | $258,850 |
Các số liệu được mô hình hóa hoạt động như thế nào. An undisclosed lead role after the breakthrough gets the median of disclosed lead salaries for its era and budget band, capped at 15% of the film’s budget. Supporting and pre-breakthrough roles get 2.5% of that median, the documented going rate for actors before stardom. Films with no reported budget are treated as small productions. Undocumented backend, endorsements, and producer or director credits enter as separate estimated lines in the calculation above, built from disclosed medians. Every median comes from the published tables on our trang phương pháp.
Tài sản ròng Over Time
Số dư theo mô hình vào cuối mỗi năm, phù hợp với bảng theo từng năm dưới đây.
Từng năm
| Year | Income | Phí đại diện | Thuế suất | Spent | Saved | Balance |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | $311,972 | $46,796 | 45% | $131,729 | $14,118 | $135,859,189 |
| 2025 | $470,405 | $70,561 | 45% | $173,468 | $46,446 | $75,936,192 |
| 2024 | $548,991 | $82,349 | 45% | $202,448 | $54,205 | $70,737,179 |
| 2023 | $8,890,581 | $1,333,587 | 45% | $2,290,978 | $1,865,368 | $65,449,410 |
| 2022 | $4,832,044 | $724,807 | 45% | $1,245,150 | $1,013,831 | $58,360,138 |
| 2021 | $2,623,004 | $393,451 | 45% | $675,911 | $550,343 | $61,539,287 |
| 2020 | $753,448 | $113,017 | 45% | $237,549 | $114,688 | $56,252,563 |
| 2019 | $2,226,416 | $333,962 | 45% | $573,716 | $467,133 | $52,255,111 |
| 2018 | $5,739,255 | $860,888 | 45% | $1,478,926 | $1,204,176 | $46,807,094 |
| 2017 | $3,417,529 | $512,629 | 47% | $848,626 | $690,971 | $45,338,143 |
| 2016 | $7,006,451 | $1,050,968 | 47% | $1,739,811 | $1,416,595 | $41,489,278 |
| 2015 | $4,136,789 | $620,518 | 47% | $1,027,229 | $836,394 | $38,092,845 |
| 2014 | $8,243,201 | $1,236,480 | 47% | $2,046,915 | $1,666,647 | $36,372,863 |
| 2013 | $4,092,268 | $613,840 | 47% | $1,016,174 | $827,393 | $32,709,005 |
| 2012 | $3,331,476 | $499,721 | 43% | $889,692 | $724,408 | $29,196,271 |
| 2011 | $8,175,735 | $1,226,360 | 43% | $2,183,382 | $1,777,761 | $26,689,535 |
| 2010 | $4,548,949 | $682,342 | 43% | $1,214,826 | $989,140 | $23,990,537 |
| 2009 | $9,046,165 | $1,356,925 | 43% | $2,415,836 | $1,967,031 | $21,530,715 |
| 2008 | $4,941,083 | $741,162 | 43% | $1,319,548 | $1,074,407 | $17,857,715 |
| 2007 | $17,898,527 | $2,684,779 | 43% | $4,779,916 | $3,891,920 | $18,449,278 |
| 2006 | $13,772,494 | $2,065,874 | 43% | $3,678,033 | $2,994,741 | $13,926,088 |
| 2005 | $17,234,015 | $2,585,102 | 43% | $4,602,454 | $3,747,426 | $10,249,824 |
| 2004 | $15,323,298 | $2,298,495 | 43% | $4,092,185 | $3,331,953 | $6,273,902 |
| 2003 | $6,237,522 | $935,628 | 43% | $1,665,770 | $1,356,309 | $2,790,369 |
| 2002 | $2,812,555 | $421,883 | 46% | $711,579 | $579,384 | $1,306,058 |
| 2001 | $2,116,301 | $317,445 | 46% | $535,426 | $435,956 | $749,249 |
| 2000 | $872,794 | $130,919 | 46% | $270,173 | $130,439 | $313,427 |
| 1999 | $175,457 | $26,319 | 46% | $63,526 | $17,009 | $180,142 |
| 1998 | $5,962 | $894 | 46% | $2,471 | $265 | $152,321 |
| 1997 | $702,131 | $105,320 | 46% | $217,344 | $104,934 | $137,569 |
| 1996 | $300,913 | $45,137 | 46% | $108,948 | $29,171 | $29,171 |
Model Notes
- salary comps: 2 disclosed lead fee(s) flagged as non-market outliers (scale / far-below-quote) and excluded from era medians
Phương pháp luận
We rebuild Jennifer’s career as a yearly time series. Disclosed salaries and documented backend enter as reported, with citations. Undisclosed lead roles get the median of disclosed salaries for their era and budget band, capped at 15% of the film’s budget. Supporting roles and roles from before the breakthrough get 2.5% of that median, the going-rate ratio measured from disclosed pre-stardom deals. Films with no reported budget are treated as small productions, and every role is estimated unless a source documents it was unpaid. Representation fees come out at sourced rates, taxes follow the eras actually lived through, spending follows measured household savings behavior unless court documents say otherwise, and what remains compounds at real market returns. Undocumented backend enters as an expected value from disclosed deals, endorsements at the median disclosed ambassador fee, and producer or director credits at union-scale floors.
Mô hình đầy đủ, mọi bảng giá và cách kiểm tra ước tính của chúng tôi so với các giao dịch thực đều có sẵn trên trang phương pháp.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is Jennifer Garner's net worth in 2026?
As of 2026, Jennifer Garner's net worth is an estimated $135.9 Million. The estimate is built film by film from disclosed salaries and documented backend, then year by year: income, minus representation fees and taxes, minus spending, compounded at real market returns.
How does Jennifer Garner make money?
Alias salaries built from Variety-covered raise reporting, plus film leads modeled from their budgets. Her Capital One campaign enters as an estimated endorsement line and her documented Juno points at the median disclosed backend rate; the Once Upon a Farm stake stays queued.
How is Jennifer Garner's net worth calculated?
Ngày trả lương được tiết lộ nhập như đã báo cáo, kèm theo trích dẫn. Các vai chính không được tiết lộ sử dụng mức lương trung bình được tiết lộ cho thời đại và ngân sách của họ, giới hạn ở mức 15% kinh phí của bộ phim và các vai phụ hoặc vai mới bắt đầu sự nghiệp sử dụng phần tiền nổi tiếng được ghi nhận của mức trung bình đó. Chúng tôi trừ đi các khoản phí đại diện có nguồn gốc, thuế trong những năm Jennifer thực sự làm việc và chi tiêu từ hành vi tiết kiệm được đo lường, sau đó gộp lại theo lợi nhuận thị trường thực. Phần phụ trợ, xác nhận và sản xuất tín dụng không có giấy tờ được nhập dưới dạng dòng ước tính từ mức trung bình được tiết lộ. Mọi tỷ lệ và nguồn đều được công bố.
How much does Jennifer Garner make per film?
Nó thay đổi tùy theo vai trò và thời đại, đồng thời bảng theo từng phim ở trên liệt kê mức thù lao được tính cho mỗi tựa phim. Ngày trả lương được tiết lộ nhập như đã báo cáo. Các vai diễn không được tiết lộ được mô phỏng từ những gì các diễn viên có thể so sánh kiếm được trong cùng thời đại và phạm vi ngân sách, với các vai chính sau bước đột phá kiếm được nhiều tiền nhất và các vai phụ hoặc vai phụ chỉ là một phần nhỏ trong số đó.
Tại sao thuế suất cao như vậy và các tác nhân không né tránh việc này với một công ty cho vay?
Thuế được tính theo mức hiệu quả tại nơi Jennifer sống mỗi năm, là mức được hiển thị trong bảng theo từng năm. Ở một tiểu bang có mức thuế cao như California, thuế thu nhập liên bang và tiểu bang kết hợp đạt gần một nửa thu nhập của người có thu nhập cao nhất, vì vậy những năm đó rơi vào khoảng giữa 40%. Một công ty cho vay, tập đoàn mà nhiều thành viên quản lý thu nhập của họ, không giảm thuế đối với số tiền họ mang về nhà. Ưu điểm thực sự của nó là khấu trừ các chi phí kinh doanh như phí đại lý, người quản lý và luật sư, đồng thời mô hình này đã trừ các chi phí đó thành một dòng riêng trước khi áp dụng bất kỳ khoản thuế nào. Những người có thu nhập cao cũng nằm ngoài khoản khấu trừ kinh doanh chuyển tiếp mà các chủ sở hữu công ty khác có thể yêu cầu, vì vậy họ không được giảm lãi suất.
Tại sao con số này khác với các trang web có giá trị ròng khác?
Most sites publish a single number with no way to check it. This estimate is built in the open: every salary, rate, and assumption is on the page, and the trang phương pháp lists every source.
Ước tính này chính xác đến mức nào?
Không có ước tính giá trị ròng nào cho một cá nhân là chính xác; đây là một mô hình được xây dựng từ dữ liệu công cộng. Sự khác biệt là bạn có thể xem nó được xây dựng như thế nào và kiểm tra từng bước. Mức độ tin cậy ở gần đầu phép tính cho biết con số dựa trên các con số được tiết lộ bao nhiêu và trang đánh dấu nơi con số dựa trên một giả định.
Is Jennifer Garner rich compared to the average person?
Yes. A net worth of $135.9 Million is far above the median American household, which sits near $193,000 according to Federal Reserve data.
What is Jennifer Garner's biggest source of wealth?
On this page it is film salaries, the largest line in the calculation at $79.2 Million. The full breakdown, with every other line and its source, is above.
How much does Jennifer Garner make from endorsements?
The model counts $32.0 Million in career endorsement income for Jennifer: 2 named partnerships x the $4.0M annual fee from the median disclosed film deal x a 4-year term, spread across the deal years. It is an estimate, since the individual deal values are not all public, and it sits as its own line in the calculation above.
What businesses does Jennifer Garner own?
The stake counted on this page is Once Upon a Farm stake. It is valued from a reported transaction or a revenue multiple, and shown as its own line in the calculation above with the basis next to it.
Khám phá các diễn viên khác
Giới thiệu về NetWorth Explained
We originally created NWE because nobody in the public-figure net worth space showed their work. Magazines and sites threw out big numbers while hiding behind vague claims of “proprietary algorithms” hoặc “insider knowledge.” That’s why we started the world’s only publication that transparently showed every assumption, every variable, and every calculation. We’re still the only ones who do it this way. Đọc thêm về NetWorth Explained.