Ana de Armas Net Worth 2026
Last updated July 18, 2026
As of 2026, Ana de Armas has an estimated net worth of $28.8 Million, computed film by film and year by year from public records and published rates. Every input, rate, and source behind the number is on this page.
Calculation
- Disclosed salaries and documented backend, each with a citation
- Undisclosed roles modeled from disclosed comparables for their era, budget band, and career stage
- Backend, endorsements, and producing credits estimated from disclosed medians
Fast Facts
| Birthdate | April 30, 1988 |
|---|---|
| Birthplace | Havana |
| Breakthrough | Knives Out (2019) |
| Best Known | Knives Out (2019) |
Who Is Ana de Armas?
Ana de Armas was born April 30, 1988 in Havana, best known for Knives Out (2019). The earnings behind Ana's net worth come from film salaries, backend participation, and endorsement deals.
The model tracks Ana's earning years from 2006 to 2026, with the biggest single year in 2025 at about $30.3 Million of gross income. After representation fees, taxes, and living costs, what stays invested compounds at market returns into an estimated $28.8 Million today.
Data
Every line below is computed from public data and the published rate tables on our methodology page. Confidence: Grade C. Documented numbers cover only a small share of this figure, so most of it is modeled from published rates and comparables (grades run from A, mostly documented, to C, mostly modeled).
The Calculation
| Line | Amount |
|---|---|
| Revenue | |
| Film pay with a disclosed figure (1 of 25 films) per-film salaries and backend from cited reporting | $3,000,000 |
| Film pay, modeled lead roles (6 of 25 films) era and budget-band medians of disclosed lead salaries | $33,135,000 |
| Film pay, modeled supporting and early roles (18 of 25 films) 2.5% of era medians: the pre-stardom rate | $8,875,000 |
| Backend points, estimated 12% of disclosed lead deals included points, at a median 2.6% of box office; applied as an expected value to 3 undisclosed lead roles | $1,374,079 |
| Endorsements, estimated (4 brand partnerships) 4 named partnerships x the $5.5M annual fee from the median disclosed film deal x a 2.1-year term | $46,200,000 |
| Residuals, estimated SAG residual rates (3.6% of distributor receipts in the post-theatrical windows) on receipts assumed at half of box office, split by role share and spread over the ten years after each release | $4,425,291 |
| Spanish television (El Internado, Hispania) 56 episodes of El Internado (2007-2010) and 17 of Hispania (2010-11) at roughly EUR 2,000 per episode, the disclosed going rate for Spanish prime-time ensemble actors of the era (okdiario.com) | $198,000 |
| Investment returns on savings actual 60/40 portfolio returns each year, after tax | $4,706,357 |
| Woodstock, Vermont estate appreciation, estimated documented $7,200,000 purchase in 2022, 4.5%/yr US appreciation, net 7% selling costs; the purchase itself is already counted in savings (hellomagazine.com) | $785,105 |
| SoHo loft, New York appreciation, estimated documented $2,900,000 purchase in 2021, sold 2025 for a documented $3,500,000, actual sale price, net 7% selling costs; the purchase itself is already counted in savings (yahoo.com) | $355,000 |
| Havana area house, Cuba appreciation, estimated estimated $200,000 purchase in 2018 (no published price; entered at the top of the premium-Havana range Cuban outlets report), 3.0%/yr Cuba appreciation, net 7% selling costs; the purchase itself is already counted in savings (en.wikipedia.org) | $35,619 |
| Expenses | |
| Representation fees agent 10% + attorney 5% | -$14,297,024 |
| Taxes Spain then US-CA then US-NY then US-VT effective rates, year by year | -$35,177,370 |
| Personal spending measured household savings rates by income | -$22,927,388 |
| Estimated net worth | $28,793,794 |
Film by Film
| Film | Year | Role | Budget | Box office | Pay counted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ballerina no disclosed fee: modeled on the $25.0M median for its era and budget band, capped at 15% of budget | 2025 | Lead | $90,000,000 | $136,900,000 | $13,500,000 |
| Eden no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $25.0M median for its era and budget band | 2025 | Supporting | $70,000,000 | $2,800,000 | $625,000 |
| Ghosted disclosed: reported $2-5M for the Apple film, middle of the range used | 2023 | Lead | $70,000,000 | – | $3,000,000 |
| Blonde no disclosed fee: modeled on the $25.0M median for its era and budget band, capped at 15% of budget | 2022 | Lead | $22,000,000 | – | $3,300,000 |
| Deep Water no disclosed fee: modeled on the $25.0M median for its era and budget band, capped at 15% of budget | 2022 | Lead | $48,900,000 | – | $7,335,000 |
| The Gray Man no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $15.0M median for its era and budget band | 2022 | Supporting | $200,000,000 | $454,023 | $375,000 |
| No Time to Die no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $15.0M median for its era and budget band | 2021 | Supporting | $301,000,000 | $774,200,000 | $375,000 |
| Sergio no disclosed fee: modeled on the $20.0M era median, capped at 15% of budget | 2020 | Lead | $12,000,000 | – | $1,800,000 |
| The Night Clerk no disclosed fee: modeled on the $20.0M era median, capped at 15% of budget | 2020 | Lead | $8,000,000 | $302,127 | $1,200,000 |
| Knives Out no disclosed fee: modeled on the $20.0M median for its era and budget band, capped at 15% of budget | 2019 | Lead | $40,000,000 | $311,400,000 | $6,000,000 |
| The Informer no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $20.0M median for its era and budget band | 2019 | Supporting | $60,000,000 | $2,900,000 | $500,000 |
| Wasp Network no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $20.0M era median | 2019 | Supporting | $11,990,511 | $1,400,000 | $500,000 |
| Blade Runner 2049 no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $20.0M median for its era and budget band | 2017 | Supporting | $185,000,000 | $259,300,000 | $500,000 |
| Overdrive no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $20.0M median for its era and budget band | 2017 | Lead | $26,292,068 | $9,650,552 | $500,000 |
| Exposed no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $20.0M era median | 2016 | Lead | $6,000,000 | $260,000 | $500,000 |
| Hands of Stone no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $20.0M median for its era and budget band | 2016 | Supporting | $20,000,000 | $5,000,000 | $500,000 |
| War Dogs no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $20.0M median for its era and budget band | 2016 | Supporting | $50,000,000 | $86,200,000 | $500,000 |
| Anabel no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $20.0M era median | 2015 | Lead | $5,000,000 | – | $500,000 |
| Knock Knock no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $20.0M era median | 2015 | Lead | $10,000,000 | $6,300,000 | $500,000 |
| For a Handful of Kisses no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $20.0M median for its era and budget band | 2014 | Lead | $40,000,000 | – | $500,000 |
| Faraday no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $20.0M median for its era and budget band | 2013 | Lead | $40,000,000 | – | $500,000 |
| Blind Alley no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $20.0M median for its era and budget band | 2011 | Lead | $40,000,000 | – | $500,000 |
| Sex, Party and Lies no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $20.0M era median | 2009 | Lead | $4,065,600 | $5,700,000 | $500,000 |
| Madrigal no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $20.0M median for its era and budget band | 2007 | Supporting | $40,000,000 | – | $500,000 |
| Una rosa de Francia no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $20.0M median for its era and budget band | 2006 | Supporting | $40,000,000 | – | $500,000 |
How the modeled figures work. An undisclosed lead role after the breakthrough gets the median of disclosed lead salaries for its era and budget band, capped at 15% of the film’s budget. Supporting and pre-breakthrough roles get 2.5% of that median, the documented going rate for actors before stardom. Films with no reported budget are treated as small productions. Undocumented backend, endorsements, and producer or director credits enter as separate estimated lines in the calculation above, built from disclosed medians. Every median comes from the published tables on our methodology page.
Net Worth Over Time
Modeled balance at the end of each year, matching the year-by-year table below.
Year by Year
| Year | Income | Rep fees | Tax rate | Spent | Saved | Balance |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | $435,401 | $65,310 | 43% | $160,323 | $50,628 | $28,793,794 |
| 2025 | $30,301,750 | $4,545,262 | 43% | $7,193,787 | $7,487,411 | $27,567,442 |
| 2024 | $15,757,422 | $2,363,613 | 43% | $3,740,891 | $3,893,580 | $18,327,550 |
| 2023 | $18,757,422 | $2,813,613 | 43% | $4,453,106 | $4,634,865 | $13,020,351 |
| 2022 | $11,367,356 | $1,705,103 | 43% | $2,698,667 | $2,808,817 | $7,447,608 |
| 2021 | $620,871 | $93,131 | 45% | $182,862 | $107,395 | $5,526,977 |
| 2020 | $3,246,617 | $486,993 | 45% | $743,719 | $774,075 | $4,855,081 |
| 2019 | $8,017,313 | $1,202,597 | 45% | $1,836,566 | $1,911,528 | $3,715,816 |
| 2018 | $63,487 | $9,523 | 45% | $26,415 | $3,265 | $1,559,912 |
| 2017 | $1,020,415 | $153,062 | 47% | $289,609 | $170,088 | $1,598,529 |
| 2016 | $1,507,128 | $226,069 | 47% | $332,691 | $346,270 | $1,296,732 |
| 2015 | $1,003,386 | $150,508 | 47% | $284,776 | $167,249 | $898,629 |
| 2014 | $503,386 | $75,508 | 47% | $142,868 | $83,907 | $726,043 |
| 2013 | $503,386 | $75,508 | 43% | $153,651 | $90,239 | $597,781 |
| 2012 | $3,386 | $508 | 43% | $1,460 | $180 | $442,426 |
| 2011 | $525,386 | $78,808 | 43% | $160,366 | $94,183 | $406,061 |
| 2010 | $65,386 | $9,808 | 43% | $28,195 | $3,485 | $301,401 |
| 2009 | $538,000 | $80,700 | 43% | $164,216 | $96,445 | $272,808 |
| 2008 | $38,000 | $5,700 | 43% | $16,386 | $2,025 | $154,141 |
| 2007 | $538,000 | $80,700 | 43% | $164,216 | $96,445 | $190,382 |
| 2006 | $500,000 | $75,000 | 43% | $152,618 | $89,633 | $89,633 |
Methodology
We rebuild Ana’s career as a yearly time series. Disclosed salaries and documented backend enter as reported, with citations. Undisclosed lead roles get the median of disclosed salaries for their era and budget band, capped at 15% of the film’s budget. Supporting roles and roles from before the breakthrough get 2.5% of that median, the going-rate ratio measured from disclosed pre-stardom deals. Films with no reported budget are treated as small productions, and every role is estimated unless a source documents it was unpaid. Representation fees come out at sourced rates, taxes follow the eras actually lived through, spending follows measured household savings behavior unless court documents say otherwise, and what remains compounds at real market returns. Undocumented backend enters as an expected value from disclosed deals, endorsements at the median disclosed ambassador fee, and producer or director credits at union-scale floors.
The full model, every rate table, and how our estimates have checked out against real deals are on the methodology page.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is Ana de Armas's net worth in 2026?
As of 2026, Ana de Armas's net worth is an estimated $28.8 Million. The estimate is built film by film from disclosed salaries and documented backend, then year by year: income, minus representation fees and taxes, minus spending, compounded at real market returns.
How does Ana de Armas make money?
Film salaries since her 2019 Knives Out breakthrough, including a reported $3M for Ghosted and the Ballerina lead. Four documented brand partnerships (Estée Lauder, Louis Vuitton, Campari, Natural Diamond Council) and undisclosed backend enter as estimated lines built from disclosed comparables.
How is Ana de Armas's net worth calculated?
Disclosed paydays enter as reported, with citations. Undisclosed lead roles use the median of disclosed salaries for their era and budget band, capped at 15% of the film's budget, and supporting or early-career roles use the documented pre-stardom fraction of that median. We subtract sourced representation fees, taxes for the years Ana actually worked, and spending from measured savings behavior, then compound at real market returns. Undocumented backend, endorsements, and producing credits enter as estimated lines from disclosed medians. Every rate and source is published.
How much does Ana de Armas make per film?
It varies by role and era, and the film-by-film table above lists the pay counted for every title. Disclosed paydays enter as reported. Undisclosed roles are modeled from what comparable actors earned in the same era and budget range, with lead roles after the breakthrough earning the most and supporting or early roles a documented fraction of that.
Why is the tax rate so high, and don't actors avoid it with a loan-out company?
Tax comes out at the effective rate for where Ana lived each year, which is the rate shown in the year-by-year table. In a high-tax state like California, combined federal and state income tax reaches close to half of a top earner's income, so those years run in the mid-40s percent. A loan-out company, the corporation many actors run their income through, does not lower the tax on the money they take home. Its real advantage is deducting business costs such as agent, manager, and attorney fees, and the model already subtracts those as a separate line before any tax is applied. High-earning performers also fall outside the pass-through business deduction that other company owners can claim, so it buys them no rate cut.
Why is this figure different from other net worth sites?
Most sites publish a single number with no way to check it. This estimate is built in the open: every salary, rate, and assumption is on the page, and the methodology page lists every source.
How accurate is this estimate?
No net worth estimate for a private individual is exact; this one is a model built from public data. The difference is that you can see how it was built and check every step. The confidence grade near the top of the calculation shows how much of the figure rests on disclosed numbers, and the page flags where a number leans on an assumption.
Is Ana de Armas rich compared to the average person?
Yes. A net worth of $28.8 Million is far above the median American household, which sits near $193,000 according to Federal Reserve data.
What is Ana de Armas's biggest source of wealth?
On this page it is endorsements, the largest line in the calculation at $46.2 Million. The full breakdown, with every other line and its source, is above.
How much does Ana de Armas make from endorsements?
The model counts $46.2 Million in career endorsement income for Ana: 4 named partnerships x the $5.5M annual fee from the median disclosed film deal x a 2.1-year term. It is an estimate, since the individual deal values are not all public, and it sits as its own line in the calculation above.
Explore Other Actors
About NetWorth Explained
We originally created NWE because nobody in the public-figure net worth space showed their work. Magazines and sites threw out big numbers while hiding behind vague claims of “proprietary algorithms” or “insider knowledge.” That’s why we started the world’s only publication that transparently showed every assumption, every variable, and every calculation. We’re still the only ones who do it this way. Read more about NetWorth Explained.