Jason Statham Net Worth 2026
Last updated July 18, 2026
As of 2026, Jason Statham has an estimated net worth of $155.4 Million, computed film by film and year by year from public records and published rates. Every input, rate, and source behind the number is on this page.
Calculation
- Disclosed salaries and documented backend, each with a citation
- Undisclosed roles modeled from disclosed comparables for their era, budget band, and career stage
- Backend, endorsements, and producing credits estimated from disclosed medians
Fast Facts
| Birthdate | July 26, 1967 |
|---|---|
| Birthplace | Shirebrook |
| Breakthrough | Lock, Stock and Two Smoking Barrels (1998) |
| Best Known | The Transporter (2002) |
Who Is Jason Statham?
Jason Statham was born July 26, 1967 in Shirebrook, best known for The Transporter (2002). The earnings behind Jason's net worth come from film salaries, backend participation, and producing and directing fees.
The model tracks Jason's earning years from 1998 to 2026, with the biggest single year in 2023 at about $50.0 Million of gross income. After representation fees, taxes, and living costs, what stays invested compounds at market returns into an estimated $155.4 Million today.
Data
Every line below is computed from public data and the published rate tables on our methodology page. Confidence: Grade C. Documented numbers cover only a small share of this figure, so most of it is modeled from published rates and comparables (grades run from A, mostly documented, to C, mostly modeled).
The Calculation
| Line | Amount |
|---|---|
| Revenue | |
| Film pay with a disclosed figure (3 of 43 films) per-film salaries and backend from cited reporting | $63,000,000 |
| Film pay, modeled lead roles (29 of 43 films) era and budget-band medians of disclosed lead salaries | $203,347,259 |
| Film pay, modeled supporting and early roles (11 of 43 films) 2.5% of era medians: the pre-stardom rate | $4,925,000 |
| Backend points, estimated 12% of disclosed lead deals included points, at a median 2.6% of box office; applied as an expected value to 29 undisclosed lead roles | $8,326,834 |
| Producer, director, and writer credits, estimated (3 credits) union-scale floor per credit, scaled to each era; actual hyphenate fees run higher, so this is a floor | $804,024 |
| Residuals, estimated SAG residual rates (3.6% of distributor receipts in the post-theatrical windows) on receipts assumed at half of box office, split by role share and spread over the ten years after each release | $29,900,846 |
| Investment returns on savings actual 60/40 portfolio returns each year, after tax | $75,191,000 |
| Rising Glen home, Hollywood Hills appreciation, estimated documented $2,700,000 purchase in 2015, sold 2021 for a documented $5,075,000, actual sale price, net 7% selling costs; the purchase itself is already counted in savings (francisyork.com) | $2,019,750 |
| Chelsea townhouse, London appreciation, estimated documented $9,600,000 purchase in 2020 (reported GBP 7.5M, converted at the 2020 average rate), 5.0%/yr UK appreciation, net 7% selling costs; the purchase itself is already counted in savings (telegrafi.com) | $2,364,374 |
| Hampshire coastal estate (land) appreciation, estimated documented $25,400,000 purchase in 2024 (reported GBP 20M land purchase, converted; the further ~GBP 5M build enters when documented), 5.0%/yr UK appreciation, net 7% selling costs; the purchase itself is already counted in savings (portsmouth.co.uk) | $643,255 |
| Expenses | |
| Representation fees agent 10% + attorney 5% | -$45,563,612 |
| Taxes UK then US-CA then UK effective rates, year by year | -$110,350,954 |
| Personal spending measured household savings rates by income | -$72,684,210 |
| Estimated net worth | $155,377,014 |
Film by Film
| Film | Year | Role | Budget | Box office | Pay counted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A Working Man no disclosed fee: modeled on the $25.0M median for its era and budget band, capped at 15% of budget | 2025 | Lead + P | $40,000,000 | $100,600,000 | $6,000,000 |
| The Beekeeper disclosed: reported $25M | 2024 | Lead + P | $40,000,000 | $162,600,000 | $25,000,000 |
| Expend4bles no disclosed fee: modeled on the $15.0M median for its era and budget band | 2023 | Lead + P | $100,000,000 | $51,000,000 | $15,000,000 |
| Fast X no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $15.0M median for its era and budget band | 2023 | Supporting | $340,000,000 | $704,900,000 | $375,000 |
| Meg 2: The Trench disclosed: reported $25M | 2023 | Lead | $129,000,000 | $397,400,000 | $25,000,000 |
| Operation Fortune: Ruse de Guerre no disclosed fee: modeled on the $25.0M median for its era and budget band, capped at 15% of budget | 2023 | Lead | $50,000,000 | $45,700,000 | $7,500,000 |
| Wrath of Man no disclosed fee: modeled on the $25.0M median for its era and budget band, capped at 15% of budget | 2021 | Lead | $40,000,000 | $104,000,000 | $6,000,000 |
| Fast & Furious Presents: Hobbs & Shaw disclosed: reported $13M plus EP credit | 2019 | Lead | $200,000,000 | $760,000,000 | $13,000,000 |
| The Meg no disclosed fee: modeled on the $20.0M median for its era and budget band | 2018 | Lead | $178,000,000 | $530,200,000 | $20,000,000 |
| The Fate of the Furious no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $20.0M median for its era and budget band | 2017 | Supporting | $270,000,000 | $1,236,000,000 | $500,000 |
| Furious 7 no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $20.0M median for its era and budget band | 2015 | Supporting | $250,000,000 | $1,516,000,000 | $500,000 |
| Spy no disclosed fee: modeled on the $20.0M median for its era and budget band, capped at 15% of budget | 2015 | Lead | $65,000,000 | $235,700,000 | $9,750,000 |
| Wild Card no disclosed fee: modeled on the $20.0M median for its era and budget band, capped at 15% of budget | 2015 | Lead | $30,000,000 | $6,700,000 | $4,500,000 |
| The Expendables 3 no disclosed fee: modeled on the $20.0M median for its era and budget band, capped at 15% of budget | 2014 | Lead | $100,000,000 | $214,700,000 | $15,000,000 |
| Homefront no disclosed fee: modeled on the $20.0M median for its era and budget band, capped at 15% of budget | 2013 | Lead | $22,000,000 | $51,700,000 | $3,300,000 |
| Hummingbird no disclosed fee: modeled on the $20.0M median for its era and budget band, capped at 15% of budget | 2013 | Lead | $20,000,000 | $12,600,000 | $3,000,000 |
| Safe no disclosed fee: modeled on the $20.0M median for its era and budget band, capped at 15% of budget | 2012 | Lead | $30,000,000 | $40,600,000 | $4,500,000 |
| The Expendables 2 no disclosed fee: modeled on the $20.0M median for its era and budget band, capped at 15% of budget | 2012 | Lead | $100,000,000 | $315,000,000 | $15,000,000 |
| Blitz no disclosed fee: modeled on the $20.0M median for its era and budget band, capped at 15% of budget | 2011 | Lead | $35,000,000 | $15,800,000 | $5,250,000 |
| Gnomeo & Juliet no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $20.0M median for its era and budget band | 2011 | Supporting | $36,000,000 | $193,900,000 | $500,000 |
| Killer Elite no disclosed fee: modeled on the $20.0M median for its era and budget band, capped at 15% of budget | 2011 | Lead | $70,000,000 | $56,400,000 | $10,500,000 |
| The Mechanic no disclosed fee: modeled on the $20.0M median for its era and budget band, capped at 15% of budget | 2011 | Lead | $40,000,000 | $76,300,000 | $6,000,000 |
| The Expendables no disclosed fee: modeled on the $20.0M median for its era and budget band, capped at 15% of budget | 2010 | Lead | $82,000,000 | $274,500,000 | $12,300,000 |
| Crank: High Voltage no disclosed fee: modeled on the $20.0M median for its era and budget band, capped at 15% of budget | 2009 | Lead | $20,000,000 | $34,600,000 | $3,000,000 |
| Death Race no disclosed fee: modeled on the $20.0M median for its era and budget band, capped at 15% of budget | 2008 | Lead | $65,000,000 | $76,000,000 | $9,750,000 |
| In the Name of the King no disclosed fee: modeled on the $20.0M median for its era and budget band, capped at 15% of budget | 2008 | Lead | $60,000,000 | $13,100,000 | $9,000,000 |
| The Bank Job no disclosed fee: modeled on the $20.0M median for its era and budget band, capped at 15% of budget | 2008 | Lead | $20,000,000 | $66,099,999 | $3,000,000 |
| Transporter 3 no disclosed fee: modeled on the $20.0M median for its era and budget band, capped at 15% of budget | 2008 | Lead | $41,102,852 | $109,000,000 | $6,165,428 |
| War no disclosed fee: modeled on the $20.0M median for its era and budget band, capped at 15% of budget | 2007 | Lead | $25,000,000 | $40,700,000 | $3,750,000 |
| Crank no disclosed fee: modeled on the $20.0M era median, capped at 15% of budget | 2006 | Lead | $12,000,000 | $42,900,000 | $1,800,000 |
| Chaos no disclosed fee: modeled on the $20.0M median for its era and budget band, capped at 15% of budget | 2005 | Lead | $24,746,578 | $7,000,000 | $3,711,987 |
| London no disclosed fee: modeled on the $20.0M median for its era and budget band, capped at 15% of budget | 2005 | Lead | $27,946,169 | $200,361 | $4,191,925 |
| Revolver no disclosed fee: modeled on the $20.0M median for its era and budget band, capped at 15% of budget | 2005 | Lead | $26,622,389 | $6,700,000 | $3,993,358 |
| Transporter 2 no disclosed fee: modeled on the $20.0M median for its era and budget band, capped at 15% of budget | 2005 | Lead | $32,469,540 | $89,100,000 | $4,870,431 |
| Cellular no disclosed fee: modeled on the $20.0M median for its era and budget band, capped at 15% of budget | 2004 | Lead | $25,000,000 | $57,700,000 | $3,750,000 |
| The Italian Job no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $20.0M median for its era and budget band | 2003 | Supporting | $60,000,000 | $176,100,000 | $500,000 |
| The Transporter no disclosed fee: modeled on the $20.0M era median, capped at 15% of budget | 2002 | Lead | $18,427,530 | $43,900,000 | $2,764,130 |
| Ghosts of Mars no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $20.0M median for its era and budget band | 2001 | Lead | $28,000,000 | $14,000,000 | $500,000 |
| Mean Machine no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $20.0M era median | 2001 | Lead | $3,571,429 | $7,300,000 | $500,000 |
| The One no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $20.0M median for its era and budget band | 2001 | Supporting | $49,000,000 | $78,000,000 | $500,000 |
| Snatch no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $20.0M era median | 2000 | Supporting | $10,000,000 | $83,600,000 | $500,000 |
| Turn It Up no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $20.0M era median | 2000 | Supporting | $13,000,000 | $1,200,000 | $500,000 |
| Lock, Stock and Two Smoking Barrels no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $2.0M median for its era and budget band | 1998 | Supporting | $1,400,000 | $28,100,000 | $50,000 |
How the modeled figures work. An undisclosed lead role after the breakthrough gets the median of disclosed lead salaries for its era and budget band, capped at 15% of the film’s budget. Supporting and pre-breakthrough roles get 2.5% of that median, the documented going rate for actors before stardom. Films with no reported budget are treated as small productions. Undocumented backend, endorsements, and producer or director credits enter as separate estimated lines in the calculation above, built from disclosed medians. Every median comes from the published tables on our methodology page.
Net Worth Over Time
Modeled balance at the end of each year, matching the year-by-year table below.
Year by Year
| Year | Income | Rep fees | Tax rate | Spent | Saved | Balance |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | $1,557,481 | $233,622 | 40% | $500,419 | $293,897 | $155,377,014 |
| 2025 | $8,436,162 | $1,265,424 | 40% | $2,108,197 | $2,194,246 | $150,055,738 |
| 2024 | $27,158,969 | $4,073,845 | 40% | $6,787,026 | $7,064,048 | $133,954,837 |
| 2023 | $49,973,357 | $7,496,004 | 40% | $12,488,342 | $12,998,070 | $113,510,612 |
| 2022 | $1,745,381 | $261,807 | 40% | $436,171 | $453,974 | $88,422,996 |
| 2021 | $8,118,290 | $1,217,743 | 40% | $2,028,761 | $2,111,567 | $104,812,371 |
| 2020 | $1,962,788 | $294,418 | 40% | $490,501 | $510,521 | $91,189,417 |
| 2019 | $14,531,901 | $2,179,785 | 45% | $3,328,895 | $3,464,768 | $81,935,997 |
| 2018 | $22,997,913 | $3,449,687 | 45% | $5,268,247 | $5,483,277 | $67,842,951 |
| 2017 | $1,720,089 | $258,013 | 47% | $379,701 | $395,199 | $64,037,456 |
| 2016 | $1,245,571 | $186,836 | 47% | $353,512 | $207,618 | $57,774,137 |
| 2015 | $16,436,941 | $2,465,541 | 47% | $3,628,373 | $3,776,469 | $54,427,161 |
| 2014 | $16,508,837 | $2,476,326 | 47% | $3,644,243 | $3,792,988 | $50,281,125 |
| 2013 | $7,335,323 | $1,100,298 | 47% | $1,619,236 | $1,685,327 | $43,276,985 |
| 2012 | $21,242,432 | $3,186,365 | 43% | $5,043,060 | $5,248,899 | $36,793,427 |
| 2011 | $23,265,833 | $3,489,875 | 43% | $5,523,425 | $5,748,871 | $29,084,020 |
| 2010 | $13,550,932 | $2,032,640 | 43% | $3,217,059 | $3,348,368 | $22,589,689 |
| 2009 | $3,495,560 | $524,334 | 43% | $829,863 | $863,735 | $17,695,203 |
| 2008 | $28,961,370 | $4,344,206 | 43% | $6,875,574 | $7,156,210 | $14,805,030 |
| 2007 | $4,087,181 | $613,077 | 43% | $970,317 | $1,009,922 | $9,572,991 |
| 2006 | $2,118,437 | $317,765 | 43% | $502,927 | $523,455 | $8,189,622 |
| 2005 | $17,209,045 | $2,581,357 | 43% | $4,085,513 | $4,252,269 | $7,071,621 |
| 2004 | $4,018,313 | $602,747 | 40% | $1,004,177 | $1,045,163 | $2,738,830 |
| 2003 | $566,218 | $84,933 | 40% | $181,926 | $106,845 | $1,613,692 |
| 2002 | $2,938,738 | $440,811 | 40% | $734,391 | $764,366 | $1,353,739 |
| 2001 | $1,516,258 | $227,439 | 40% | $378,913 | $394,379 | $648,804 |
| 2000 | $1,004,046 | $150,607 | 40% | $250,911 | $261,152 | $264,365 |
| 1999 | $4,046 | $607 | 40% | $1,837 | $227 | $3,239 |
| 1998 | $50,000 | $7,500 | 40% | $22,695 | $2,805 | $2,805 |
Model Notes
- RESIDENCE PROXY: UK resident through his early career, documented Los Angeles base since the mid-2000s
- UK filing check: attributable company net assets $540,616 (REME Enterprises Limited (03996313, GBP 432,477 at 2025-05-31, band mid 88%); REME (Featherman) Limited (07205679, GBP 521,335 at 2025-05-31, band mid 88%); AKA Films Limited (12615695, GBP -720 at 2025-05-31, band mid 88%); College Road Services Limited (12855073, GBP 100 at 2025-05-31, band mid 88%); Punch Palace Productions Limited (13933257, GBP -46,365 at 2025-05-31, band mid 88%); Punch Palace Limited (13968070, GBP 100 at 2025-05-31, band mid 88%); AENDS Limited (14229323, GBP -622,417 at 2025-05-31, band mid 62%); Little Marsh Construction Limited (15244000, GBP 24,150 at 2025-02-28, band mid 88%)) sit below the modeled balance; counted as a documented floor, not added
Methodology
We rebuild Jason’s career as a yearly time series. Disclosed salaries and documented backend enter as reported, with citations. Undisclosed lead roles get the median of disclosed salaries for their era and budget band, capped at 15% of the film’s budget. Supporting roles and roles from before the breakthrough get 2.5% of that median, the going-rate ratio measured from disclosed pre-stardom deals. Films with no reported budget are treated as small productions, and every role is estimated unless a source documents it was unpaid. Representation fees come out at sourced rates, taxes follow the eras actually lived through, spending follows measured household savings behavior unless court documents say otherwise, and what remains compounds at real market returns. Undocumented backend enters as an expected value from disclosed deals, endorsements at the median disclosed ambassador fee, and producer or director credits at union-scale floors.
The full model, every rate table, and how our estimates have checked out against real deals are on the methodology page.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is Jason Statham's net worth in 2026?
As of 2026, Jason Statham's net worth is an estimated $155.4 Million. The estimate is built film by film from disclosed salaries and documented backend, then year by year: income, minus representation fees and taxes, minus spending, compounded at real market returns.
How does Jason Statham make money?
Film salaries that climbed from $6K on his debut to disclosed $25M paydays for Meg 2 and The Beekeeper. His UK companies file publicly and are checked against the model; the register documents small production entities while the wealth sits elsewhere.
How is Jason Statham's net worth calculated?
Disclosed paydays enter as reported, with citations. Undisclosed lead roles use the median of disclosed salaries for their era and budget band, capped at 15% of the film's budget, and supporting or early-career roles use the documented pre-stardom fraction of that median. We subtract sourced representation fees, taxes for the years Jason actually worked, and spending from measured savings behavior, then compound at real market returns. Undocumented backend, endorsements, and producing credits enter as estimated lines from disclosed medians. Every rate and source is published.
How much does Jason Statham make per film?
It varies by role and era, and the film-by-film table above lists the pay counted for every title. Disclosed paydays enter as reported. Undisclosed roles are modeled from what comparable actors earned in the same era and budget range, with lead roles after the breakthrough earning the most and supporting or early roles a documented fraction of that.
Why is the tax rate so high, and don't actors avoid it with a loan-out company?
Tax comes out at the effective rate for where Jason lived each year, which is the rate shown in the year-by-year table. In a high-tax state like California, combined federal and state income tax reaches close to half of a top earner's income, so those years run in the mid-40s percent. A loan-out company, the corporation many actors run their income through, does not lower the tax on the money they take home. Its real advantage is deducting business costs such as agent, manager, and attorney fees, and the model already subtracts those as a separate line before any tax is applied. High-earning performers also fall outside the pass-through business deduction that other company owners can claim, so it buys them no rate cut.
Why is this figure different from other net worth sites?
Most sites publish a single number with no way to check it. This estimate is built in the open: every salary, rate, and assumption is on the page, and the methodology page lists every source.
How accurate is this estimate?
No net worth estimate for a private individual is exact; this one is a model built from public data. The difference is that you can see how it was built and check every step. The confidence grade near the top of the calculation shows how much of the figure rests on disclosed numbers, and the page flags where a number leans on an assumption.
Is Jason Statham rich compared to the average person?
Yes. A net worth of $155.4 Million is far above the median American household, which sits near $193,000 according to Federal Reserve data.
What is Jason Statham's biggest source of wealth?
On this page it is film salaries, the largest line in the calculation at $203.3 Million. The full breakdown, with every other line and its source, is above.
Explore Other Actors
About NetWorth Explained
We originally created NWE because nobody in the public-figure net worth space showed their work. Magazines and sites threw out big numbers while hiding behind vague claims of “proprietary algorithms” or “insider knowledge.” That’s why we started the world’s only publication that transparently showed every assumption, every variable, and every calculation. We’re still the only ones who do it this way. Read more about NetWorth Explained.