Rupert Grint Net Worth 2026
Last updated July 17, 2026
As of 2026, Rupert Grint has an estimated net worth of $207.4 Million, computed film by film and year by year from public records and published rates. Every input, rate, and source behind the number is on this page.
Calculation
- Disclosed salaries and documented backend, each with a citation
- Undisclosed roles modeled from disclosed comparables for their era, budget band, and career stage
- Backend, endorsements, and producing credits estimated from disclosed medians
Fast Facts
| Birthdate | n/a |
|---|---|
| Birthplace | n/a |
| Breakthrough | career breakthrough modeled at 2001 |
| Best Known | CBGB |
Data
Every line below is computed from public data and the published rate tables on our methodology page. Confidence: Grade C. Documented numbers cover only a small share of this figure, so most of it is modeled from published rates and comparables (grades run from A, mostly documented, to C, mostly modeled).
The Calculation
| Line | Amount |
|---|---|
| Revenue | |
| Film pay, modeled lead roles (50 of 60 films) era and budget-band medians of disclosed lead salaries | $224,963,661 |
| Film pay, modeled supporting and early roles (10 of 60 films) 2.5% of era medians: the pre-stardom rate | $5,000,000 |
| Backend points, estimated 12% of disclosed lead deals included points, at a median 2.6% of box office; applied as an expected value to 17 undisclosed lead roles | $26,801,593 |
| Endorsements, estimated (1 documented brand partnerships) 1 named partnerships x the $5.5M median disclosed ambassador fee x the 2.1-year median disclosed term | $11,550,000 |
| Residuals, estimated SAG residual rates (3.6% of distributor receipts in the post-theatrical windows) on receipts assumed at half of box office, split by role share and spread over the ten years after each release | $51,975,245 |
| Investment returns on savings actual 60/40 portfolio returns each year, after tax | $126,386,021 |
| Expenses | |
| Representation fees agent 10% + attorney 5% | -$48,036,130 |
| Taxes UK effective rates, year by year | -$108,881,894 |
| Personal spending measured household savings rates by income | -$80,028,192 |
| Income tax on the Clay 10 payment, after the tribunal ruled against him he took GBP 4.5M out of Clay 10 in 2011 and treated it as capital; HMRC called it income. The First-tier Tribunal dismissed his appeal in November 2024 and put the bill at GBP 1,801,060 for the 2011/12 year. A separate appeal over the timing of his accounting date had already gone against him in 2019. | -$2,290,000 |
| Estimated net worth | $207,390,670 |
Film by Film
| Film | Year | Role | Budget | Box office | Pay counted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ebenezer: A Christmas Carol no disclosed fee: modeled on the $20.0M era median; budget unreported, small-film terms | 2026 | Lead | – | – | $3,000,000 |
| Nightborn no disclosed fee: modeled on the $20.0M era median; budget unreported, small-film terms | 2026 | Lead | – | – | $3,000,000 |
| A Little More (Ed Sheeran song) no disclosed fee: modeled on the $20.0M era median; budget unreported, small-film terms | 2025 | Lead | – | – | $3,000,000 |
| Knock at the Cabin no disclosed fee: modeled on the $25.0M median for its era and budget band, capped at 15% of budget | 2023 | Lead | $20,000,000 | – | $3,000,000 |
| Guillermo del Toro's Cabinet of Curiosities no disclosed fee: modeled on the $20.0M era median; budget unreported, small-film terms | 2022 | Lead | – | – | $3,000,000 |
| Harry Potter 20th Anniversary: Return to Hogwarts no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $20.0M era median; budget unreported, small-film terms | 2022 | Supporting | – | – | $500,000 |
| Pena De Prata no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $20.0M era median; budget unreported, small-film terms | 2021 | Supporting | – | – | $500,000 |
| Saleka no disclosed fee: modeled on the $20.0M era median; budget unreported, small-film terms | 2021 | Lead | – | – | $3,000,000 |
| Servant no disclosed fee: modeled on the $20.0M era median; budget unreported, small-film terms | 2021 | Lead | – | – | $3,000,000 |
| Servant no disclosed fee: modeled on the $20.0M era median; budget unreported, small-film terms | 2018 | Lead | – | – | $3,000,000 |
| The ABC Murders no disclosed fee: modeled on the $20.0M era median; budget unreported, small-film terms | 2018 | Lead | – | – | $3,000,000 |
| Sick Note no disclosed fee: modeled on the $20.0M era median; budget unreported, small-film terms | 2017 | Lead | – | – | $3,000,000 |
| Snatch no disclosed fee: modeled on the $20.0M era median, capped at 15% of budget | 2017 | Lead | $10,000,000 | $83,557,872 | $1,500,000 |
| Urban Myths no disclosed fee: modeled on the $20.0M era median; budget unreported, small-film terms | 2017 | Lead | – | – | $3,000,000 |
| Tracey Ullman's Show no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $20.0M era median; budget unreported, small-film terms | 2016 | Supporting | – | – | $500,000 |
| Enemy of Man no disclosed fee: modeled on the $20.0M era median; budget unreported, small-film terms | 2015 | Lead | – | – | $3,000,000 |
| Favorite Breakthrough Performance (Male) no disclosed fee: modeled on the $20.0M era median; budget unreported, small-film terms | 2015 | Lead | – | – | $3,000,000 |
| Favorite Funny Performance no disclosed fee: modeled on the $20.0M era median; budget unreported, small-film terms | 2015 | Lead | – | – | $3,000,000 |
| It's Only a Play no disclosed fee: modeled on the $20.0M era median; budget unreported, small-film terms | 2015 | Lead | – | – | $3,000,000 |
| Moonwalkers no disclosed fee: modeled on the $20.0M era median; budget unreported, small-film terms | 2015 | Lead | – | $135,622 | $3,000,000 |
| Tom Gates no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $20.0M era median; budget unreported, small-film terms | 2015 | Supporting | – | – | $500,000 |
| "Struck by Lightning" no disclosed fee: modeled on the $20.0M era median; budget unreported, small-film terms | 2014 | Lead | – | – | $3,000,000 |
| Harry Potter and the Escape from Gringotts no disclosed fee: modeled on the $20.0M era median; budget unreported, small-film terms | 2014 | Lead | – | – | $3,000,000 |
| Hogwarts Express no disclosed fee: modeled on the $20.0M era median; budget unreported, small-film terms | 2014 | Lead | – | – | $3,000,000 |
| It's Only a Play no disclosed fee: modeled on the $20.0M era median; budget unreported, small-film terms | 2014 | Lead | – | – | $3,000,000 |
| Postman Pat: The Movie no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $20.0M era median; budget unreported, small-film terms | 2014 | Supporting | – | – | $500,000 |
| Underdogs no disclosed fee: modeled on the $20.0M median for its era and budget band, capped at 15% of budget | 2014 | Lead | $21,000,000 | $32,768,940 | $3,150,000 |
| CBGB no disclosed fee: modeled on the $20.0M era median; budget unreported, small-film terms | 2013 | Lead | – | – | $3,000,000 |
| Charlie Countryman no disclosed fee: modeled on the $20.0M era median, capped at 15% of budget | 2013 | Lead | $424,404 | $424,404 | $63,661 |
| Mojo no disclosed fee: modeled on the $20.0M era median; budget unreported, small-film terms | 2013 | Lead | – | – | $3,000,000 |
| American Dad! no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $20.0M era median; budget unreported, small-film terms | 2012 | Supporting | – | – | $500,000 |
| Favourite Film Star ( under 25 ) no disclosed fee: modeled on the $20.0M era median; budget unreported, small-film terms | 2012 | Lead | – | – | $3,000,000 |
| Holidays at Home are Great no disclosed fee: modeled on the $20.0M era median; budget unreported, small-film terms | 2012 | Lead | – | – | $3,000,000 |
| Into the White no disclosed fee: modeled on the $20.0M era median; budget unreported, small-film terms | 2012 | Lead | – | $712,216 | $3,000,000 |
| National Space Centre (England) no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $20.0M era median; budget unreported, small-film terms | 2012 | Supporting | – | – | $500,000 |
| Over the Rainbow no disclosed fee: modeled on the $20.0M era median; budget unreported, small-film terms | 2012 | Lead | – | – | $3,000,000 |
| Come Fly with Me no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $20.0M era median; budget unreported, small-film terms | 2011 | Supporting | – | – | $500,000 |
| Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows – Part 2 no disclosed fee: modeled on the $20.0M median for its era and budget band | 2011 | Lead | $250,000,000 | $1,341,511,219 | $20,000,000 |
| IGN no disclosed fee: modeled on the $20.0M era median; budget unreported, small-film terms | 2011 | Lead | – | – | $3,000,000 |
| Lego House no disclosed fee: modeled on the $20.0M era median; budget unreported, small-film terms | 2011 | Lead | – | – | $3,000,000 |
| Red Nose Day 2011 no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $20.0M era median; budget unreported, small-film terms | 2011 | Supporting | – | – | $500,000 |
| Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows – Part 1 no disclosed fee: modeled on the $20.0M median for its era and budget band | 2010 | Lead | $250,000,000 | $976,536,918 | $20,000,000 |
| Harry Potter and the Forbidden Journey no disclosed fee: modeled on the $20.0M era median; budget unreported, small-film terms | 2010 | Lead | – | – | $3,000,000 |
| Wild Target no disclosed fee: modeled on the $20.0M era median, capped at 15% of budget | 2010 | Lead | $8,000,000 | $3,500,000 | $1,200,000 |
| Best Ensemble no disclosed fee: modeled on the $20.0M era median; budget unreported, small-film terms | 2009 | Lead | – | – | $3,000,000 |
| Cherrybomb no disclosed fee: modeled on the $20.0M era median; budget unreported, small-film terms | 2009 | Lead | – | – | $3,000,000 |
| Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince no disclosed fee: modeled on the $10.0M median for its era and budget band | 2009 | Lead | $250,000,000 | $933,959,197 | $10,000,000 |
| Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix no disclosed fee: modeled on the $10.0M median for its era and budget band | 2007 | Lead | $150,000,000 | $941,676,843 | $10,000,000 |
| Driving Lessons no disclosed fee: modeled on the $20.0M era median; budget unreported, small-film terms | 2006 | Lead | – | $1,300,000 | $3,000,000 |
| The Queen's Handbag no disclosed fee: modeled on the $20.0M era median; budget unreported, small-film terms | 2006 | Lead | – | – | $3,000,000 |
| Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire no disclosed fee: modeled on the $10.0M median for its era and budget band | 2005 | Lead | $150,000,000 | $895,921,036 | $10,000,000 |
| Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban no disclosed fee: modeled on the $10.0M median for its era and budget band | 2004 | Lead | $130,000,000 | $797,361,618 | $10,000,000 |
| BBC Radio 4 no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $20.0M era median; budget unreported, small-film terms | 2003 | Supporting | – | – | $500,000 |
| Harry Potter and the Chamber of Secrets no disclosed fee: modeled on the $10.0M median for its era and budget band | 2003 | Lead | $100,000,000 | $879,793,867 | $10,000,000 |
| British Critic's Circle no disclosed fee: modeled on the $20.0M era median; budget unreported, small-film terms | 2002 | Lead | – | – | $3,000,000 |
| Emma Watson no disclosed fee: modeled on the $20.0M era median; budget unreported, small-film terms | 2002 | Lead | – | – | $3,000,000 |
| Harry Potter and the Chamber of Secrets no disclosed fee: modeled on the $10.0M median for its era and budget band | 2002 | Lead | $100,000,000 | $879,793,867 | $10,000,000 |
| Thunderpants no disclosed fee: modeled on the $20.0M era median, capped at 15% of budget | 2002 | Lead | $7,000,000 | $3,000,000 | $1,050,000 |
| Harry Potter and the Philosopher's Stone no disclosed fee: modeled on the $10.0M median for its era and budget band | 2001 | Lead | $125,000,000 | $978,087,613 | $10,000,000 |
| Harry Potter and the Philosopher's Stone (film) no disclosed fee: modeled on the $20.0M era median; budget unreported, small-film terms | 2001 | Lead | – | – | $3,000,000 |
How the modeled figures work. An undisclosed lead role after the breakthrough gets the median of disclosed lead salaries for its era and budget band, capped at 15% of the film’s budget. Supporting and pre-breakthrough roles get 2.5% of that median, the documented going rate for actors before stardom. Films with no reported budget are treated as small productions. Undocumented backend, endorsements, and producer or director credits enter as separate estimated lines in the calculation above, built from disclosed medians. Every median comes from the published tables on our methodology page.
Net Worth Over Time
Modeled balance at the end of each year, matching the year-by-year table below.
Year by Year
| Year | Income | Rep fees | Tax rate | Spent | Saved | Balance |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | $6,049,633 | $907,445 | 40% | $1,511,803 | $1,573,510 | $207,390,670 |
| 2025 | $6,899,714 | $1,034,957 | 40% | $1,724,239 | $1,794,616 | $205,817,161 |
| 2024 | $3,919,179 | $587,877 | 40% | $979,403 | $1,019,378 | $184,833,836 |
| 2023 | $6,919,431 | $1,037,915 | 40% | $1,729,166 | $1,799,744 | $166,480,412 |
| 2022 | $3,569,854 | $535,478 | 40% | $892,106 | $928,519 | $144,873,046 |
| 2021 | $7,366,712 | $1,105,007 | 40% | $1,840,941 | $1,916,082 | $171,505,453 |
| 2020 | $1,448,853 | $217,328 | 40% | $362,068 | $376,847 | $150,580,670 |
| 2019 | $2,003,625 | $300,544 | 40% | $500,706 | $521,143 | $135,721,768 |
| 2018 | $8,003,625 | $1,200,544 | 40% | $2,000,106 | $2,081,743 | $115,547,399 |
| 2017 | $10,269,288 | $1,540,393 | 40% | $2,566,295 | $2,671,042 | $116,518,439 |
| 2016 | $3,014,120 | $452,118 | 40% | $753,229 | $783,973 | $102,539,727 |
| 2015 | $18,546,632 | $2,781,995 | 40% | $4,634,803 | $4,823,979 | $95,758,946 |
| 2014 | $19,250,757 | $2,887,614 | 40% | $4,810,764 | $5,007,122 | $90,215,051 |
| 2013 | $10,087,691 | $1,513,154 | 40% | $2,520,914 | $2,623,808 | $78,855,342 |
| 2012 | $17,548,868 | $2,632,330 | 40% | $4,385,462 | $4,564,461 | $66,776,748 |
| 2011 | $35,439,895 | $5,315,984 | 40% | $8,856,430 | $9,217,917 | $57,300,067 |
| 2010 | $30,950,548 | $4,642,582 | 40% | $7,734,542 | $8,050,238 | $46,526,311 |
| 2009 | $22,054,639 | $3,308,196 | 40% | $5,511,454 | $5,736,412 | $35,346,494 |
| 2008 | $3,193,899 | $479,085 | 40% | $798,155 | $830,733 | $25,755,737 |
| 2007 | $15,518,923 | $2,327,838 | 40% | $3,878,179 | $4,036,472 | $31,195,248 |
| 2006 | $8,637,753 | $1,295,663 | 40% | $2,158,574 | $2,246,680 | $26,202,895 |
| 2005 | $14,845,822 | $2,226,873 | 40% | $3,709,971 | $3,861,398 | $22,446,466 |
| 2004 | $14,070,300 | $2,110,545 | 40% | $3,516,168 | $3,659,685 | $18,157,992 |
| 2003 | $14,300,194 | $2,145,029 | 40% | $3,573,618 | $3,719,480 | $13,813,700 |
| 2002 | $20,335,004 | $3,050,251 | 40% | $5,081,717 | $5,289,134 | $9,068,565 |
| 2001 | $15,995,907 | $2,399,386 | 40% | $3,997,377 | $4,160,535 | $4,160,535 |
Model Notes
- RESIDENCE PROXY: Hertfordshire estate, so UK rates apply throughout
- UK filing check: attributable company net assets $33,477,181 (Clay 10 Limited (07724029, GBP 30,050,660 at 2025-03-31, band mid 88%); Eevil Plan Properties Limited (08571078, GBP 75,037 at 2025-03-31, band mid 88%)) sit below the modeled balance; counted as a documented floor, not added
- Image credit: Wikimedia Commons via Wikipedia (Rupert Grint)
Methodology
We rebuild Rupert’s career as a yearly time series. Disclosed salaries and documented backend enter as reported, with citations. Undisclosed lead roles get the median of disclosed salaries for their era and budget band, capped at 15% of the film’s budget. Supporting roles and roles from before the breakthrough get 2.5% of that median, the going-rate ratio measured from disclosed pre-stardom deals. Films with no reported budget are treated as small productions, and every role is estimated unless a source documents it was unpaid. Representation fees come out at sourced rates, taxes follow the eras actually lived through, spending follows measured household savings behavior unless court documents say otherwise, and what remains compounds at real market returns. Undocumented backend enters as an expected value from disclosed deals, endorsements at the median disclosed ambassador fee, and producer or director credits at union-scale floors.
The full model, every rate table, and how our estimates have checked out against real deals are on the methodology page.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is Rupert Grint's net worth in 2026?
As of 2026, Rupert Grint's net worth is an estimated $207.4 Million. The estimate is built film by film from disclosed salaries and documented backend, then year by year: income, minus representation fees and taxes, minus spending, compounded at real market returns.
How does Rupert Grint make money?
Film salaries and documented backend participation.
How is Rupert Grint's net worth calculated?
Disclosed paydays enter as reported, with citations. Undisclosed lead roles use the median of disclosed salaries for their era and budget band, capped at 15% of the film's budget, and supporting or early-career roles use the documented pre-stardom fraction of that median. We subtract sourced representation fees, taxes for the years Rupert actually worked, and spending from measured savings behavior, then compound at real market returns. Undocumented backend, endorsements, and producing credits enter as estimated lines from disclosed medians. Every rate and source is published.
How much does Rupert Grint make per film?
It varies by role and era, and the film-by-film table above lists the pay counted for every title. Disclosed paydays enter as reported. Undisclosed roles are modeled from what comparable actors earned in the same era and budget range, with lead roles after the breakthrough earning the most and supporting or early roles a documented fraction of that.
Why is the tax rate so high, and don't actors avoid it with a loan-out company?
Tax comes out at the effective rate for where Rupert lived each year, which is the rate shown in the year-by-year table. In a high-tax state like California, combined federal and state income tax reaches close to half of a top earner's income, so those years run in the mid-40s percent. A loan-out company, the corporation many actors run their income through, does not lower the tax on the money they take home. Its real advantage is deducting business costs such as agent, manager, and attorney fees, and the model already subtracts those as a separate line before any tax is applied. High-earning performers also fall outside the pass-through business deduction that other company owners can claim, so it buys them no rate cut.
Why is this figure different from other net worth sites?
Most sites publish a single number with no way to check it. This estimate is built in the open: every salary, rate, and assumption is on the page, and the methodology page lists every source.
How accurate is this estimate?
No net worth estimate for a private individual is exact; this one is a model built from public data. The difference is that you can see how it was built and check every step. The confidence grade near the top of the calculation shows how much of the figure rests on disclosed numbers, and the page flags where a number leans on an assumption.
Is Rupert Grint rich compared to the average person?
Yes. A net worth of $207.4 Million is far above the median American household, which sits near $193,000 according to Federal Reserve data.
Explore Other Actors
About NetWorth Explained
We originally created NWE because nobody in the public-figure net worth space showed their work. Magazines and sites threw out big numbers while hiding behind vague claims of “proprietary algorithms” or “insider knowledge.” That’s why we started the world’s only publication that transparently showed every assumption, every variable, and every calculation. We’re still the only ones who do it this way. Read more about NetWorth Explained.