Al Pacino Tài sản ròng 2026
Cập nhật lần cuối August 3, 2026
As of 2026, Al Pacino has an estimated net worth of $416.0 Million, computed film by film and year by year from public records and published rates. Every input, rate, and source behind the number is on this page.
Calculation
- Mức lương được tiết lộ và phần phụ trợ được ghi lại, mỗi phần đều có trích dẫn
- Các vai trò không được tiết lộ được mô phỏng từ những vai trò có thể so sánh được tiết lộ cho thời đại, mức ngân sách và giai đoạn sự nghiệp của họ
- Phần phụ trợ, chứng thực và tạo ra các khoản tín dụng ước tính từ mức trung bình được tiết lộ
Fast Facts
| Birthdate | April 25, 1940 |
|---|---|
| Birthplace | Manhattan |
| Breakthrough | The Basic Training of Pavlo Hummel (1972) |
| Best Known | The Godfather (1972) |
Who Is Al Pacino?
Al Pacino was born April 25, 1940 in Manhattan, best known for The Godfather (1972). The earnings behind Al's net worth come from film salaries, backend participation, and endorsement deals.
The model tracks Al's earning years from 1966 to 2026, with the biggest single year in 2025 at about $39.9 Million of gross income. After representation fees, taxes, and living costs, what stays invested compounds at market returns into an estimated $416.0 Million today.
Data
Mỗi dòng bên dưới được tính toán từ dữ liệu công khai và bảng giá được công bố trên trang của chúng tôi trang phương pháp. Sự tự tin: hạng C. Các số liệu được ghi lại chỉ bao gồm một phần nhỏ của con số này, vì vậy hầu hết nó được mô hình hóa từ các tỷ lệ đã công bố và các điểm so sánh (các điểm chạy từ A, hầu hết được ghi lại, đến C, chủ yếu được mô hình hóa).
The Calculation
| Line | Amount |
|---|---|
| Revenue | |
| Film pay, modeled lead roles (96 of 111 films) era and budget-band medians of disclosed lead salaries (winsorized, thin cells shrunk toward the era median), blended with this actor's disclosed quote history when available; soft breakthrough blend near the career break year | $501,799,487 |
| Film pay, modeled post-breakthrough supporting roles (6 of 111 films) 12.0% of lead cells: lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio | $8,729,999 |
| Film pay, modeled supporting and early roles (9 of 111 films) 2,5% mức trung bình của thời đại: tỷ lệ trước khi trở thành ngôi sao | $2,194,678 |
| Điểm phụ trợ, ước tính 12% of disclosed lead deals included points, at a median 2.6% of box office; expected value on 76 commercially viable undisclosed lead roles; cash spread over 3 years; 47 film(s) used band-specific box-office/budget multiples as a gross proxy | $18,312,158 |
| Chứng thực, ước tính (1 quan hệ đối tác thương hiệu) 1 named partnerships x the $4.0M annual fee from the median disclosed film deal x a 4-year term, spread across the deal years | $16,000,000 |
| Số dư, ước tính SAG residual rates on post-theatrical receipts assumed at half of box office, split by role share and spread over the ten years after each release; 58 film(s) used band-specific box-office proxies | $37,749,754 |
| TV: N.Y.P.D. John James; guest default per credited year; broadcast network family; priced from tv_episode_rates.csv (en.wikipedia.org) | $150,000 |
| TV: Angels in America Roy Cohn; stated episode count; cable network family; priced from tv_episode_rates.csv (en.wikipedia.org) | $450,000 |
| TV: You Don't Know Jack Dr. Jack Kevorkian; one engagement for a television film or special; animation format tier; priced from tv_episode_rates.csv (en.wikipedia.org) | $35,000 |
| TV: Phil Spector Phil Spector; one engagement for a television film or special; network not identified, priced on the broadcast cell; priced from tv_episode_rates.csv (en.wikipedia.org) | $75,000 |
| TV: Paterno Joe Paterno; one engagement for a television film or special; network not identified, priced on the broadcast cell; priced from tv_episode_rates.csv (en.wikipedia.org) | $75,000 |
| TV: Hunters Meyer Offerman; stated episode count; network not identified, priced on the broadcast cell; priced from tv_episode_rates.csv (en.wikipedia.org) | $1,350,000 |
| Lợi tức đầu tư từ tiền tiết kiệm mixed portfolio: 55% actual 60/40 securities returns (taxed) + 45% US long-run home-price rate on the rest | $294,853,091 |
| Expenses | |
| Phí đại diện đại lý 10% + luật sư 5% | -$86,705,134 |
| Taxes Tỷ lệ hiệu quả của US-CA, theo từng năm | -$221,432,279 |
| Chi tiêu cá nhân measured household savings rates by income, times a 88% entertainment-household factor | -$148,799,727 |
| Giá trị ròng ước tính | $415,950,180 |
Phim theo phim
| Film | Year | Role | Budget | Phòng vé | Tính lương |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Father Joe no disclosed fee: modeled on the $23.8M shrunk median for 2020s/large (n=2), capped at $10.5M | 2026 | Lead | $70,000,000 | – | $10,500,000 |
| Killing Castro no disclosed fee: modeled on the $23.8M shrunk median for 2020s/large (n=2), capped at $10.5M | 2026 | Lead | $70,000,000 | – | $10,500,000 |
| Lear Rex no disclosed fee: modeled on the $23.8M shrunk median for 2020s/large (n=2), capped at $10.5M | 2026 | Lead | $70,000,000 | – | $10,500,000 |
| Maserati: The Brothers no disclosed fee: modeled on the $23.8M shrunk median for 2020s/large (n=2), capped at $10.5M | 2026 | Lead | $70,000,000 | – | $10,500,000 |
| Billy Knight no disclosed fee: modeled on the $23.8M shrunk median for 2020s/large (n=2), capped at $10.5M | 2025 | Lead | $70,000,000 | – | $10,500,000 |
| Dead Man's Wire no disclosed fee: modeled on the $25.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid), capped at $2.2M | 2025 | Lead | $15,000,000 | $2,500,000 | $2,250,000 |
| Easy's Waltz no disclosed fee: modeled on the $23.8M shrunk median for 2020s/large (n=2), capped at $10.5M | 2025 | Lead | $70,000,000 | – | $10,500,000 |
| In the Hand of Dante no disclosed fee: modeled on the $21.7M shrunk median for 2020s/mid (n=1), capped at $3.8M | 2025 | Lead | $25,000,000 | – | $3,750,000 |
| The Ritual (2025 film) no disclosed fee: modeled on the $23.8M shrunk median for 2020s/large (n=2), capped at $10.5M | 2025 | Lead | $70,000,000 | $5,700,000 | $10,500,000 |
| Modì, Three Days on the Wing of Madness no disclosed fee: modeled on the $23.8M shrunk median for 2020s/large (n=2), capped at $10.5M | 2024 | Lead | $70,000,000 | $492,740 | $10,500,000 |
| Knox Goes Away no disclosed fee: modeled on the $23.8M shrunk median for 2020s/large (n=2), capped at $10.5M | 2023 | Lead | $70,000,000 | $451,530 | $10,500,000 |
| American Traitor: The Trial of Axis Sally no disclosed fee: modeled on the $23.8M shrunk median for 2020s/large (n=2), capped at $10.5M | 2021 | Lead | $70,000,000 | – | $10,500,000 |
| House of Gucci no disclosed fee: modeled on the $23.8M shrunk median for 2020s/large (n=2), capped at $11.2M | 2021 | Lead | $75,000,000 | $153,300,000 | $11,250,000 |
| Once Upon a Time in Hollywood no disclosed fee: modeled on the $20.0M shrunk median for 2010s/large (n=8), capped at $13.9M | 2019 | Lead | $93,000,000 | $374,343,626 | $13,950,000 |
| The Irishman no disclosed fee: modeled on the $15.8M shrunk median for 2010s/blockbuster (n=11) | 2019 | Lead | $204,500,000 | $8,000,000 | $15,769,231 |
| Hunters no disclosed fee: modeled on the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3), capped at $6.0M | 2018 | Lead | $40,000,000 | – | $6,000,000 |
| Paterno no disclosed fee: modeled on the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3), capped at $6.0M | 2018 | Lead | $40,000,000 | – | $6,000,000 |
| Frank Serpico no disclosed fee: modeled on the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3), capped at $6.0M | 2017 | Lead | $40,000,000 | – | $6,000,000 |
| Hangman no disclosed fee: modeled on the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3), capped at $6.0M | 2017 | Lead | $40,000,000 | $104,503 | $6,000,000 |
| Julian Schnabel: A Private Portrait no disclosed fee: modeled on the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3), capped at $6.0M | 2017 | Lead | $40,000,000 | – | $6,000,000 |
| Tennessee Williams no disclosed fee: modeled on the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3), capped at $6.0M | 2017 | Lead | $40,000,000 | – | $6,000,000 |
| The Pirates of Somalia (film) no disclosed fee: modeled on the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3), capped at $6.0M | 2017 | Lead | $40,000,000 | – | $6,000,000 |
| Misconduct no disclosed fee: modeled on the $5.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid), capped at $1.6M | 2016 | Lead | $11,000,000 | $2,100,000 | $1,650,000 |
| Danny Collins no disclosed fee: modeled on the $5.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid), capped at $1.5M | 2015 | Lead | $10,000,000 | $10,800,000 | $1,500,000 |
| Manglehorn no disclosed fee: modeled on the $5.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid), capped at $0.6M | 2014 | Lead | $4,000,000 | $459,636 | $600,000 |
| The Humbling (film) no disclosed fee: modeled on the $5.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid), capped at $0.3M | 2014 | Lead | $2,000,000 | $400,000 | $300,000 |
| Phil Spector no disclosed fee: modeled on the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3), capped at $6.0M | 2013 | Lead | $40,000,000 | – | $6,000,000 |
| Salomé no disclosed fee: modeled on the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3), capped at $6.0M | 2013 | Lead | $40,000,000 | – | $6,000,000 |
| Casting By no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio) | 2012 | Supporting | $40,000,000 | – | $1,320,000 |
| Stand Up Guys no disclosed fee: modeled on the $5.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid), capped at $2.2M | 2012 | Lead | $15,000,000 | $5,100,000 | $2,250,000 |
| Jack and Jill no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $20.0M shrunk median for 2010s/large (n=8) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio) | 2011 | Supporting | $79,000,000 | $149,000,000 | $2,400,000 |
| The Son of No One no disclosed fee: modeled on the $5.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid), capped at $2.2M | 2011 | Lead | $15,000,000 | $1,100,000 | $2,250,000 |
| Wilde Salomé no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio) | 2011 | Supporting | $40,000,000 | – | $1,320,000 |
| You Don't Know Jack no disclosed fee: modeled on the $5.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid), capped at $2.7M | 2010 | Lead | $18,000,000 | – | $2,700,000 |
| I Knew It Was You no disclosed fee: modeled on the $19.4M shrunk median for 2000s/mid (n=2), capped at $6.0M | 2009 | Lead | $40,000,000 | – | $6,000,000 |
| Righteous Kill no disclosed fee: modeled on the $20.0M shrunk median for 2000s/large (n=18), capped at $9.0M | 2008 | Lead | $60,000,000 | $79,400,000 | $9,000,000 |
| 88 Minutes no disclosed fee: modeled on the $19.4M shrunk median for 2000s/mid (n=2), capped at $4.5M | 2007 | Lead | $30,000,000 | $32,600,000 | $4,500,000 |
| Brando no disclosed fee: modeled on the $19.4M shrunk median for 2000s/mid (n=2), capped at $6.0M | 2007 | Lead | $40,000,000 | – | $6,000,000 |
| Ocean's Thirteen no disclosed fee: modeled on the $20.0M shrunk median for 2000s/large (n=18), capped at $12.8M | 2007 | Lead | $85,000,000 | $311,312,624 | $12,750,000 |
| China Doll no disclosed fee: modeled on the $19.4M shrunk median for 2000s/mid (n=2), capped at $6.0M | 2006 | Lead | $40,000,000 | – | $6,000,000 |
| Glengarry Glen Ross no disclosed fee: modeled on the $19.4M shrunk median for 2000s/mid (n=2), capped at $6.0M | 2006 | Lead | $40,000,000 | – | $6,000,000 |
| Salome no disclosed fee: modeled on the $19.4M shrunk median for 2000s/mid (n=2), capped at $6.0M | 2006 | Lead | $40,000,000 | – | $6,000,000 |
| Scarface: The World is Yours no disclosed fee: modeled on the $19.4M shrunk median for 2000s/mid (n=2), capped at $6.0M | 2006 | Lead | $40,000,000 | – | $6,000,000 |
| The Merchant of Venice no disclosed fee: modeled on the $19.4M shrunk median for 2000s/mid (n=2), capped at $6.0M | 2006 | Lead | $40,000,000 | – | $6,000,000 |
| Orphans no disclosed fee: modeled on the $19.4M shrunk median for 2000s/mid (n=2), capped at $6.0M | 2005 | Lead | $40,000,000 | – | $6,000,000 |
| Two for the Money no disclosed fee: modeled on the $19.4M shrunk median for 2000s/mid (n=2), capped at $4.1M | 2005 | Lead | $27,500,000 | $30,500,000 | $4,125,000 |
| The Merchant of Venice (2004 film) no disclosed fee: modeled on the $19.4M shrunk median for 2000s/mid (n=2), capped at $4.5M | 2004 | Lead | $30,000,000 | $21,417,725 | $4,500,000 |
| Angels in America no disclosed fee: modeled on the $19.4M shrunk median for 2000s/mid (n=2), capped at $6.0M | 2003 | Lead | $40,000,000 | – | $6,000,000 |
| Gigli no disclosed fee: modeled on the $20.0M shrunk median for 2000s/large (n=18), capped at $11.3M | 2003 | Lead | $75,600,000 | $7,300,000 | $11,340,000 |
| Salome no disclosed fee: modeled on the $19.4M shrunk median for 2000s/mid (n=2), capped at $6.0M | 2003 | Lead | $40,000,000 | – | $6,000,000 |
| The Recruit (film) no disclosed fee: modeled on the $19.4M shrunk median for 2000s/mid (n=2), capped at $6.9M | 2003 | Lead | $46,000,000 | $101,200,000 | $6,900,000 |
| Insomnia no disclosed fee: modeled on the $19.4M shrunk median for 2000s/mid (n=2), capped at $6.9M | 2002 | Lead | $46,000,000 | $113,800,000 | $6,900,000 |
| People I Know no disclosed fee: modeled on the $19.4M shrunk median for 2000s/mid (n=2), capped at $6.0M | 2002 | Lead | $40,000,000 | $5,484,302 | $6,000,000 |
| Simone no disclosed fee: modeled on the $18.8M median for its era and nearest band (mid), capped at $1.5M | 2002 | Lead | $10,000,000 | $19,600,000 | $1,500,000 |
| The Resistible Rise of Arturo Ui no disclosed fee: modeled on the $19.4M shrunk median for 2000s/mid (n=2), capped at $6.0M | 2002 | Lead | $40,000,000 | – | $6,000,000 |
| Chinese Coffee no disclosed fee: modeled on the $19.4M shrunk median for 2000s/mid (n=2), capped at $6.0M | 2000 | Lead | $40,000,000 | – | $6,000,000 |
| AirPlay no disclosed fee: modeled on the $14.4M shrunk median for 1990s/mid (n=6), capped at $3.9M | 1999 | Lead | $26,000,000 | – | $3,900,000 |
| Any Given Sunday no disclosed fee: modeled on the $14.6M shrunk median for 1990s/large (n=3), capped at $8.2M | 1999 | Lead | $55,000,000 | $100,200,000 | $8,250,000 |
| Mark Taper Forum no disclosed fee: modeled on the $14.4M shrunk median for 1990s/mid (n=6), capped at $3.9M | 1999 | Lead | $26,000,000 | – | $3,900,000 |
| The Insider (film) no disclosed fee: modeled on the $14.6M shrunk median for 1990s/large (n=3), capped at $11.8M | 1999 | Lead | $79,000,000 | $60,300,000 | $11,850,000 |
| Donnie Brasco no disclosed fee: modeled on the $14.4M shrunk median for 1990s/mid (n=6), capped at $5.2M | 1997 | Lead | $35,000,000 | $124,900,000 | $5,250,000 |
| Pitch no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $14.4M shrunk median for 1990s/mid (n=6) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio) | 1997 | Supporting | $26,000,000 | – | $1,725,000 |
| The Devil's Advocate (1997 film) no disclosed fee: modeled on the $14.6M shrunk median for 1990s/large (n=3), capped at $8.6M | 1997 | Lead | $57,000,000 | $153,000,000 | $8,550,000 |
| Circle in the Square Theatre, Broadway no disclosed fee: modeled on the $14.4M shrunk median for 1990s/mid (n=6), capped at $3.9M | 1996 | Lead | $26,000,000 | – | $3,900,000 |
| City Hall no disclosed fee: modeled on the $14.4M shrunk median for 1990s/mid (n=6), capped at $6.0M | 1996 | Lead | $40,000,000 | $33,400,000 | $5,999,999 |
| Hughie no disclosed fee: modeled on the $14.4M shrunk median for 1990s/mid (n=6), capped at $3.9M | 1996 | Lead | $26,000,000 | – | $3,900,000 |
| Looking for Richard no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $14.4M shrunk median for 1990s/mid (n=6) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio) | 1996 | Supporting | $26,000,000 | $1,408,575 | $1,725,000 |
| Heat no disclosed fee: modeled on the $14.6M shrunk median for 1990s/large (n=3), capped at $9.0M | 1995 | Lead | $60,000,000 | $187,400,000 | $8,999,998 |
| Two Bits no disclosed fee: modeled on the $14.4M shrunk median for 1990s/mid (n=6), capped at $3.9M | 1995 | Lead | $26,000,000 | $26,282 | $3,899,999 |
| Carlito's Way no disclosed fee: modeled on the $14.4M shrunk median for 1990s/mid (n=6), capped at $4.5M | 1993 | Lead | $30,000,000 | $64,000,000 | $4,499,997 |
| Chinese Coffee no disclosed fee: modeled on the $14.4M shrunk median for 1990s/mid (n=6), capped at $3.9M | 1992 | Lead | $26,000,000 | – | $3,899,994 |
| Glengarry Glen Ross no disclosed fee: modeled on the $10.0M shrunk median for 1990s/small (n=1), capped at $1.9M | 1992 | Lead | $12,500,000 | $10,700,000 | $1,874,997 |
| Salome no disclosed fee: modeled on the $14.4M shrunk median for 1990s/mid (n=6), capped at $3.9M | 1992 | Lead | $26,000,000 | – | $3,899,994 |
| Scent of a Woman no disclosed fee: modeled on the $14.4M shrunk median for 1990s/mid (n=6), capped at $4.7M | 1992 | Lead | $31,000,000 | $134,100,000 | $4,649,993 |
| Frankie and Johnny no disclosed fee: modeled on the $14.4M shrunk median for 1990s/mid (n=6), capped at $4.3M | 1991 | Lead | $29,000,000 | $67,000,000 | $4,349,987 |
| Madonna: Truth or Dare no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $2.0M median for its era and nearest band (small) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio) | 1991 | Supporting | $4,500,000 | $29,000,000 | $239,999 |
| Dick Tracy no disclosed fee: modeled on the $14.4M shrunk median for 1990s/mid (n=6), capped at $6.9M | 1990 | Lead | $46,000,000 | $162,700,000 | $6,899,960 |
| The Godfather Part III no disclosed fee: modeled on the $14.6M shrunk median for 1990s/large (n=3), capped at $8.1M | 1990 | Lead | $54,000,000 | $136,900,000 | $8,099,952 |
| The Local Stigmatic no disclosed fee: modeled on the $14.4M shrunk median for 1990s/mid (n=6), capped at $3.9M | 1990 | Lead | $26,000,000 | – | $3,899,978 |
| Sea of Love no disclosed fee: modeled on the $4.1M shrunk median for pre1990/small (n=2), capped at $2.9M | 1989 | Lead | $19,000,000 | $110,900,000 | $2,849,967 |
| Julius Caesar no disclosed fee: modeled on the $4.1M shrunk median for pre1990/small (n=2), capped at $2.1M | 1988 | Lead | $14,000,000 | – | $2,099,953 |
| National Anthems no disclosed fee: modeled on the $4.1M shrunk median for pre1990/small (n=2), capped at $2.1M | 1988 | Lead | $14,000,000 | – | $2,099,953 |
| Revolution no disclosed fee: modeled on the $6.3M shrunk median for pre1990/mid (n=4), capped at $4.2M | 1985 | Lead | $28,000,000 | $358,574 | $4,199,304 |
| Duke of York's Theatre no disclosed fee: modeled on the $4.1M shrunk median for pre1990/small (n=2), capped at $2.1M | 1984 | Lead | $14,000,000 | – | $2,099,330 |
| Scarface no disclosed fee: modeled on the $6.3M shrunk median for pre1990/mid (n=4), capped at $4.5M | 1983 | Lead | $30,250,000 | $66,400,000 | $4,534,641 |
| Author! Author! no disclosed fee: modeled on the $4.1M shrunk median for pre1990/small (n=2), capped at $2.1M | 1982 | Lead | $14,000,000 | $13,100,000 | $2,097,462 |
| American Buffalo no disclosed fee: modeled on the $4.1M shrunk median for pre1990/small (n=2), capped at $2.1M | 1980 | Lead | $14,000,000 | – | $2,090,406 |
| Booth Theatre no disclosed fee: modeled on the $4.1M shrunk median for pre1990/small (n=2), capped at $2.1M | 1980 | Lead | $14,000,000 | – | $2,090,406 |
| Circle in the Square Theatre no disclosed fee: modeled on the $4.1M shrunk median for pre1990/small (n=2), capped at $2.1M | 1980 | Lead | $14,000,000 | – | $2,090,406 |
| Cruising no disclosed fee: modeled on the $4.1M shrunk median for pre1990/small (n=2), capped at $1.6M | 1980 | Lead | $11,000,000 | $17,300,000 | $1,642,568 |
| ...And Justice for All (film) no disclosed fee: modeled on the $2.8M median for its era and nearest band (small), capped at $0.6M | 1979 | Lead | $4,000,000 | $33,300,000 | $595,051 |
| Richard III no disclosed fee: modeled on the $2.8M median for its era and nearest band (small), capped at $0.5M | 1979 | Lead | $3,025,000 | – | $450,163 |
| Bobby Deerfield no disclosed fee: modeled on the $4.1M shrunk median for pre1990/small (n=2), capped at $1.0M | 1977 | Lead | $6,400,000 | $9,300,000 | $930,485 |
| The Basic Training of Pavlo Hummel no disclosed fee: modeled on the $2.8M median for its era and nearest band (small), capped at $0.5M | 1977 | Lead | $3,025,000 | – | $440,489 |
| Dog Day Afternoon no disclosed fee: modeled on the $2.8M median for its era and nearest band (small), capped at $0.6M | 1975 | Lead | $3,800,000 | $53,000,000 | $510,250 |
| The Resistible Rise of Arturo Ui no disclosed fee: modeled on the $2.8M median for its era and nearest band (small), capped at $0.5M | 1975 | Lead | $3,025,000 | – | $407,857 |
| The Godfather Part II soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.79): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $4.1M shrunk median for pre1990/small (n=2), capped at $1.9M vs early terms | 1974 | Lead | $13,000,000 | $93,000,000 | $1,564,726 |
| Richard III soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.66): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $2.8M median for its era and nearest band (small), capped at $0.5M vs early terms | 1973 | Lead | $3,025,000 | – | $323,141 |
| Scarecrow soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.66): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $2.8M median for its era and nearest band (small), capped at $0.5M vs early terms | 1973 | Lead | $3,025,000 | $4,000,000 | $323,141 |
| Serpico soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.66): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $2.8M median for its era and nearest band (small), capped at $0.5M vs early terms | 1973 | Lead | $3,300,000 | $29,800,000 | $350,397 |
| The Basic Training of Pavlo Hummel soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.50): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $2.8M median for its era and nearest band (small), capped at $0.5M vs early terms | 1972 | Lead | $3,025,000 | – | $261,250 |
| The Godfather soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.50): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $4.1M shrunk median for pre1990/small (n=2), capped at $1.0M vs early terms | 1972 | Lead | $6,500,000 | $270,500,000 | $539,062 |
| The Panic in Needle Park soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.34): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $2.8M median for its era and nearest band (small), capped at $0.2M vs early terms | 1971 | Lead | $1,645,000 | – | $129,135 |
| Camino Real soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.21): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $2.8M median for its era and nearest band (small), capped at $0.5M vs early terms | 1970 | Lead | $3,025,000 | – | $149,064 |
| Does a Tiger Wear a Necktie? no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $4.1M shrunk median for pre1990/small (n=2) (pre-stardom rate); soft-breakthrough weight 0.12 | 1969 | Lead | $15,000,000 | – | $359,039 |
| Me, Natalie no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $4.1M shrunk median for pre1990/small (n=2) (pre-stardom rate); soft-breakthrough weight 0.12 | 1969 | Lead | $15,000,000 | $1,900,000 | $359,039 |
| The Local Stigmatic no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $4.1M shrunk median for pre1990/small (n=2) (pre-stardom rate); soft-breakthrough weight 0.12 | 1969 | Lead | $15,000,000 | – | $359,039 |
| N.Y.P.D. no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $4.1M shrunk median for pre1990/small (n=2) (pre-stardom rate); soft-breakthrough weight 0.06 | 1968 | Lead | $15,000,000 | – | $242,606 |
| The Indian Wants the Bronx no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $4.1M shrunk median for pre1990/small (n=2) (pre-stardom rate); soft-breakthrough weight 0.06 | 1968 | Lead | $15,000,000 | – | $242,606 |
| America, Hurrah no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $4.1M shrunk median for pre1990/small (n=2) (pre-stardom rate); soft-breakthrough weight 0.03 | 1967 | Lead | $15,000,000 | – | $177,075 |
| Awake and Sing! no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $4.1M shrunk median for pre1990/small (n=2) (pre-stardom rate); soft-breakthrough weight 0.03 | 1967 | Lead | $15,000,000 | – | $177,075 |
Các số liệu được mô hình hóa hoạt động như thế nào. An undisclosed lead role after the breakthrough gets the median of disclosed lead salaries for its era and budget band, capped at 15% of the film’s budget. Supporting and pre-breakthrough roles get 2.5% of that median, the documented going rate for actors before stardom. Films with no reported budget are treated as small productions. Undocumented backend, endorsements, and producer or director credits enter as separate estimated lines in the calculation above, built from disclosed medians. Every median comes from the published tables on our trang phương pháp.
Tài sản ròng Over Time
Số dư theo mô hình vào cuối mỗi năm, phù hợp với bảng theo từng năm dưới đây.
Từng năm
| Year | Income | Phí đại diện | Thuế suất | Spent | Saved | Balance |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | $31,221,931 | $4,683,290 | 45% | $8,045,454 | $6,550,798 | $415,950,180 |
| 2025 | $39,862,579 | $5,979,387 | 45% | $10,272,029 | $8,363,727 | $401,273,592 |
| 2024 | $19,264,169 | $2,889,625 | 45% | $4,964,107 | $4,041,892 | $366,233,081 |
| 2023 | $11,892,957 | $1,783,943 | 45% | $3,064,648 | $2,495,309 | $335,373,546 |
| 2022 | $4,556,049 | $683,407 | 45% | $1,174,030 | $955,923 | $305,529,806 |
| 2021 | $16,865,928 | $2,529,889 | 45% | $4,346,113 | $3,538,708 | $326,843,355 |
| 2020 | $8,012,338 | $1,201,851 | 45% | $2,064,667 | $1,681,101 | $298,196,914 |
| 2019 | $22,053,089 | $3,307,963 | 45% | $5,682,772 | $4,627,047 | $276,007,362 |
| 2018 | $18,222,335 | $2,733,350 | 45% | $4,695,641 | $3,823,301 | $245,279,399 |
| 2017 | $25,379,592 | $3,806,939 | 47% | $6,302,149 | $5,131,358 | $240,054,182 |
| 2016 | $10,855,496 | $1,628,324 | 47% | $2,695,589 | $2,194,812 | $218,306,734 |
| 2015 | $2,441,403 | $366,210 | 47% | $606,238 | $493,614 | $205,434,661 |
| 2014 | $1,977,587 | $296,638 | 47% | $491,066 | $399,837 | $200,080,590 |
| 2013 | $9,707,036 | $1,456,055 | 47% | $2,410,409 | $1,962,611 | $188,189,879 |
| 2012 | $7,050,316 | $1,057,547 | 43% | $1,882,832 | $1,533,046 | $170,541,617 |
| 2011 | $6,240,491 | $936,074 | 43% | $1,666,563 | $1,356,955 | $158,428,702 |
| 2010 | $4,816,815 | $722,522 | 43% | $1,286,361 | $1,047,386 | $151,263,239 |
| 2009 | $6,620,029 | $993,004 | 43% | $1,767,921 | $1,439,483 | $140,611,228 |
| 2008 | $9,948,258 | $1,492,239 | 43% | $2,656,746 | $2,163,185 | $127,035,851 |
| 2007 | $20,770,499 | $3,115,575 | 43% | $5,546,895 | $4,516,412 | $137,267,963 |
| 2006 | $29,214,474 | $4,382,171 | 43% | $7,801,912 | $6,352,500 | $126,994,873 |
| 2005 | $17,267,961 | $2,590,194 | 43% | $4,611,519 | $3,754,808 | $113,120,828 |
| 2004 | $7,460,301 | $1,119,045 | 43% | $1,992,321 | $1,622,195 | $105,522,877 |
| 2003 | $24,131,350 | $3,619,703 | 43% | $6,444,431 | $5,247,208 | $98,547,344 |
| 2002 | $24,356,643 | $3,653,496 | 46% | $6,162,250 | $5,017,449 | $84,972,318 |
| 2001 | $7,156,124 | $1,073,419 | 46% | $1,810,505 | $1,474,156 | $82,438,749 |
| 2000 | $5,399,558 | $809,934 | 46% | $1,366,092 | $1,112,305 | $80,999,423 |
| 1999 | $22,658,524 | $3,398,779 | 46% | $5,732,625 | $4,667,638 | $78,644,922 |
| 1998 | $9,615,279 | $1,442,292 | 46% | $2,432,673 | $1,980,740 | $69,073,901 |
| 1997 | $12,132,502 | $1,819,875 | 46% | $3,069,533 | $2,499,286 | $60,700,901 |
| 1996 | $16,432,260 | $2,464,839 | 46% | $4,157,375 | $3,385,032 | $52,023,557 |
| 1995 | $14,456,233 | $2,168,435 | 46% | $3,657,438 | $2,977,972 | $45,082,194 |
| 1994 | $4,686,597 | $702,990 | 46% | $1,185,713 | $965,435 | $37,079,275 |
| 1993 | $4,036,429 | $605,464 | 46% | $1,021,220 | $831,501 | $35,469,710 |
| 1992 | $12,418,650 | $1,862,797 | 36% | $3,723,767 | $3,031,979 | $32,722,085 |
| 1991 | $8,391,236 | $1,258,685 | 36% | $2,516,136 | $2,048,697 | $28,296,760 |
| 1990 | $15,285,949 | $2,292,892 | 36% | $4,583,535 | $3,732,022 | $23,535,207 |
| 1989 | $7,947,456 | $1,192,118 | 36% | $2,383,067 | $1,940,349 | $19,284,960 |
| 1988 | $3,945,147 | $591,772 | 36% | $1,182,963 | $963,197 | $15,543,918 |
| 1987 | $1,384,804 | $207,721 | 45% | $356,844 | $290,551 | $13,617,145 |
| 1986 | $141,213 | $21,182 | 55% | $42,606 | $11,408 | $12,855,907 |
| 1985 | $3,181,636 | $477,245 | 55% | $670,797 | $546,179 | $11,817,624 |
| 1984 | $3,017,158 | $452,574 | 55% | $636,119 | $517,943 | $9,996,067 |
| 1983 | $4,057,985 | $608,698 | 55% | $855,561 | $696,618 | $8,958,046 |
| 1982 | $3,236,307 | $485,446 | 55% | $682,324 | $555,564 | $8,097,455 |
| 1981 | $1,075,109 | $161,266 | 55% | $226,670 | $184,560 | $7,392,199 |
| 1980 | $5,948,500 | $892,275 | 55% | $1,254,146 | $1,021,155 | $7,064,581 |
| 1979 | $3,460,423 | $519,063 | 55% | $729,575 | $594,037 | $5,923,476 |
| 1978 | $651,449 | $97,717 | 55% | $137,348 | $111,832 | $5,223,660 |
| 1977 | $1,367,905 | $205,186 | 55% | $288,401 | $234,823 | $5,010,368 |
| 1976 | $901,799 | $135,270 | 55% | $190,130 | $154,808 | $4,680,760 |
| 1975 | $5,137,538 | $770,631 | 55% | $1,083,168 | $881,941 | $4,436,120 |
| 1974 | $6,032,431 | $904,865 | 55% | $1,271,842 | $1,035,563 | $3,483,636 |
| 1973 | $5,711,906 | $856,786 | 55% | $1,204,264 | $980,540 | $2,399,483 |
| 1972 | $5,203,826 | $780,574 | 55% | $1,097,143 | $893,320 | $1,390,780 |
| 1971 | $394,729 | $59,209 | 55% | $83,222 | $67,762 | $487,586 |
| 1970 | $205,479 | $30,822 | 54% | $54,183 | $26,159 | $411,492 |
| 1969 | $839,544 | $125,932 | 54% | $180,938 | $147,324 | $377,684 |
| 1968 | $833,205 | $124,981 | 54% | $179,572 | $146,211 | $225,788 |
| 1967 | $393,468 | $59,020 | 54% | $84,800 | $69,046 | $77,997 |
| 1966 | $106,245 | $15,937 | 54% | $32,768 | $8,774 | $8,774 |
Model Notes
- PROXY CƯ TRÚ: nơi cư trú không có nguồn riêng lẻ cho đợt này; Mặc định US-CA được áp dụng cho đến khi được ghi lại
- salary comps: 2 disclosed lead fee(s) flagged as non-market outliers (scale / far-below-quote) and excluded from era medians
- Tín dụng hình ảnh: Wikimedia Commons via Wikipedia (Al Pacino)
Phương pháp luận
We rebuild Al’s career as a yearly time series. Disclosed salaries and documented backend enter as reported, with citations. Undisclosed lead roles get the median of disclosed salaries for their era and budget band, capped at 15% of the film’s budget. Supporting roles and roles from before the breakthrough get 2.5% of that median, the going-rate ratio measured from disclosed pre-stardom deals. Films with no reported budget are treated as small productions, and every role is estimated unless a source documents it was unpaid. Representation fees come out at sourced rates, taxes follow the eras actually lived through, spending follows measured household savings behavior unless court documents say otherwise, and what remains compounds at real market returns. Undocumented backend enters as an expected value from disclosed deals, endorsements at the median disclosed ambassador fee, and producer or director credits at union-scale floors.
Mô hình đầy đủ, mọi bảng giá và cách kiểm tra ước tính của chúng tôi so với các giao dịch thực đều có sẵn trên trang phương pháp.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is Al Pacino's net worth in 2026?
As of 2026, Al Pacino's net worth is an estimated $416.0 Million. The estimate is built film by film from disclosed salaries and documented backend, then year by year: income, minus representation fees and taxes, minus spending, compounded at real market returns.
How does Al Pacino make money?
Lương quay phim và sự tham gia phụ trợ được ghi lại.
How is Al Pacino's net worth calculated?
Disclosed paydays enter as reported, with citations. Undisclosed lead roles use the median of disclosed salaries for their era and budget band, capped at 15% of the film's budget, and supporting or early-career roles use the documented pre-stardom fraction of that median. We subtract sourced representation fees, taxes for the years Al actually worked, and spending from measured savings behavior, then compound at real market returns. Undocumented backend, endorsements, and producing credits enter as estimated lines from disclosed medians. Every rate and source is published.
How much does Al Pacino make per film?
Nó thay đổi tùy theo vai trò và thời đại, đồng thời bảng theo từng phim ở trên liệt kê mức thù lao được tính cho mỗi tựa phim. Ngày trả lương được tiết lộ nhập như đã báo cáo. Các vai diễn không được tiết lộ được mô phỏng từ những gì các diễn viên có thể so sánh kiếm được trong cùng thời đại và phạm vi ngân sách, với các vai chính sau bước đột phá kiếm được nhiều tiền nhất và các vai phụ hoặc vai phụ chỉ là một phần nhỏ trong số đó.
Tại sao thuế suất cao như vậy và các tác nhân không né tránh việc này với một công ty cho vay?
Tax comes out at the effective rate for where Al lived each year, which is the rate shown in the year-by-year table. In a high-tax state like California, combined federal and state income tax reaches close to half of a top earner's income, so those years run in the mid-40s percent. A loan-out company, the corporation many actors run their income through, does not lower the tax on the money they take home. Its real advantage is deducting business costs such as agent, manager, and attorney fees, and the model already subtracts those as a separate line before any tax is applied. High-earning performers also fall outside the pass-through business deduction that other company owners can claim, so it buys them no rate cut.
Tại sao con số này khác với các trang web có giá trị ròng khác?
Most sites publish a single number with no way to check it. This estimate is built in the open: every salary, rate, and assumption is on the page, and the trang phương pháp lists every source.
Ước tính này chính xác đến mức nào?
Không có ước tính giá trị ròng nào cho một cá nhân là chính xác; đây là một mô hình được xây dựng từ dữ liệu công cộng. Sự khác biệt là bạn có thể xem nó được xây dựng như thế nào và kiểm tra từng bước. Mức độ tin cậy ở gần đầu phép tính cho biết con số dựa trên các con số được tiết lộ bao nhiêu và trang đánh dấu nơi con số dựa trên một giả định.
Is Al Pacino rich compared to the average person?
Yes. A net worth of $416.0 Million is far above the median American household, which sits near $193,000 according to Federal Reserve data.
What is Al Pacino's biggest source of wealth?
On this page it is film salaries, the largest line in the calculation at $501.8 Million. The full breakdown, with every other line and its source, is above.
How much does Al Pacino make from endorsements?
The model counts $16.0 Million in career endorsement income for Al: 1 named partnerships x the $4.0M annual fee from the median disclosed film deal x a 4-year term, spread across the deal years. It is an estimate, since the individual deal values are not all public, and it sits as its own line in the calculation above.
Khám phá các diễn viên khác
Giới thiệu về NetWorth Explained
We originally created NWE because nobody in the public-figure net worth space showed their work. Magazines and sites threw out big numbers while hiding behind vague claims of “proprietary algorithms” hoặc “insider knowledge.” That’s why we started the world’s only publication that transparently showed every assumption, every variable, and every calculation. We’re still the only ones who do it this way. Đọc thêm về NetWorth Explained.