$165.6 Million
Chris Rock Tài sản ròng 2026
Cập nhật lần cuối August 3, 2026
As of 2026, Chris Rock has an estimated net worth of $165.6 Million, computed film by film and year by year from public records and published rates. Every input, rate, and source behind the number is on this page.
Calculation
- Mức lương được tiết lộ và phần phụ trợ được ghi lại, mỗi phần đều có trích dẫn
- Các vai trò không được tiết lộ được mô phỏng từ những vai trò có thể so sánh được tiết lộ cho thời đại, mức ngân sách và giai đoạn sự nghiệp của họ
- Phần phụ trợ, chứng thực và tạo ra các khoản tín dụng ước tính từ mức trung bình được tiết lộ
Fast Facts
| Birthdate | không có |
|---|---|
| Birthplace | không có |
| Breakthrough | career breakthrough modeled at 1996 |
| Best Known | Saturday Night Live |
Who Is Chris Rock?
Chris Rock is best known for Saturday Night Live. The earnings behind Chris's net worth come from film salaries, backend participation, and endorsement deals.
The model tracks Chris's earning years from 1985 to 2026, with the biggest single year in 1998 at about $16.7 Million of gross income. After representation fees, taxes, and living costs, what stays invested compounds at market returns into an estimated $165.6 Million today.
Data
Mỗi dòng bên dưới được tính toán từ dữ liệu công khai và bảng giá được công bố trên trang của chúng tôi trang phương pháp. Sự tự tin: hạng C. Các số liệu được ghi lại chỉ bao gồm một phần nhỏ của con số này, vì vậy hầu hết nó được mô hình hóa từ các tỷ lệ đã công bố và các điểm so sánh (các điểm chạy từ A, hầu hết được ghi lại, đến C, chủ yếu được mô hình hóa).
The Calculation
| Line | Amount |
|---|---|
| Revenue | |
| Film pay, modeled lead roles (50 of 110 films) era and budget-band medians of disclosed lead salaries (winsorized, thin cells shrunk toward the era median), blended with this actor's disclosed quote history when available; soft breakthrough blend near the career break year | $190,676,312 |
| Film pay, modeled post-breakthrough supporting roles (42 of 110 films) 12.0% of lead cells: lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio | $73,940,546 |
| Film pay, modeled supporting and early roles (18 of 110 films) 2,5% mức trung bình của thời đại: tỷ lệ trước khi trở thành ngôi sao | $6,375,669 |
| Điểm phụ trợ, ước tính 12% of disclosed lead deals included points, at a median 2.6% of box office; expected value on 18 commercially viable undisclosed lead roles; cash spread over 3 years; 1 film(s) used band-specific box-office/budget multiples as a gross proxy | $4,803,158 |
| Chứng thực, ước tính (1 quan hệ đối tác thương hiệu) 1 named partnerships x the $4.0M annual fee from the median disclosed film deal x a 4-year term, spread across the deal years | $16,000,000 |
| Số dư, ước tính SAG residual rates on post-theatrical receipts assumed at half of box office, split by role share and spread over the ten years after each release; 2 film(s) used band-specific box-office proxies | $17,925,210 |
| TV: Himself Host; television special; guest default per credited year; network not identified, priced on the broadcast cell; priced from tv_episode_rates.csv (en.wikipedia.org) | $150,000 |
| Lợi tức đầu tư từ tiền tiết kiệm mixed portfolio: 55% actual 60/40 securities returns (taxed) + 45% US long-run home-price rate on the rest | $100,755,511 |
| Expenses | |
| Phí đại diện đại lý 10% + luật sư 5% | -$46,385,168 |
| Taxes Tỷ lệ hiệu quả của US-CA, theo từng năm | -$117,975,618 |
| Chi tiêu cá nhân measured household savings rates by income, times a 88% entertainment-household factor | -$80,011,932 |
| Giá trị ròng ước tính | $165,617,247 |
Phim theo phim
| Film | Year | Role | Budget | Phòng vé | Tính lương |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lorne no disclosed fee: modeled on the $25.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid); budget unreported, small-film terms | 2026 | Lead | – | $449,135 | $3,000,000 |
| To be announced no disclosed fee: modeled on the $25.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid); budget unreported, small-film terms | 2026 | Lead | – | – | $3,000,000 |
| Being Eddie no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $25.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio); budget unreported, small-film terms | 2025 | Supporting | – | – | $3,000,000 |
| The Simpsons no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $25.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio); budget unreported, small-film terms | 2025 | Supporting | – | – | $3,000,000 |
| Everybody Still Hates Chris no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $25.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio); budget unreported, small-film terms | 2024 | Supporting | – | – | $3,000,000 |
| Chris Rock: Selective Outrage no disclosed fee: modeled on the $25.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid); budget unreported, small-film terms | 2023 | Lead | – | – | $3,000,000 |
| Paw Patrol: The Mighty Movie no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $21.7M shrunk median for 2020s/mid (n=1) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio) | 2023 | Supporting | $30,000,000 | $205,000,000 | $2,600,000 |
| Rustin no disclosed fee: modeled on the $25.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid); budget unreported, small-film terms | 2023 | Lead | – | – | $3,000,000 |
| Amsterdam no disclosed fee: modeled on the $23.8M shrunk median for 2020s/large (n=2), capped at $12.0M | 2022 | Lead | $80,000,000 | $31,200,000 | $12,000,000 |
| Bad Trip no disclosed fee: modeled on the $25.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid); budget unreported, small-film terms | 2021 | Lead | – | – | $3,000,000 |
| Spiral no disclosed fee: modeled on the $21.7M shrunk median for 2020s/mid (n=1), capped at $3.0M | 2021 | Lead | $20,000,000 | $40,600,000 | $3,000,000 |
| The One and Only Dick Gregory no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $25.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio); budget unreported, small-film terms | 2021 | Supporting | – | – | $3,000,000 |
| Fargo no disclosed fee: modeled on the $25.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid), capped at $1.1M | 2020 | Lead | $7,000,000 | $60,611,975 | $1,050,000 |
| The Comedy Store no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $25.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio); budget unreported, small-film terms | 2020 | Supporting | – | – | $3,000,000 |
| The Witches no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $16.4M shrunk median for 2020s/tentpole (n=5) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio) | 2020 | Supporting | $100,000,000 | $26,900,000 | $1,971,428 |
| Dolemite Is My Name no disclosed fee: modeled on the $5.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid); budget unreported, small-film terms | 2019 | Lead | – | – | $2,999,999 |
| Old Town Road no disclosed fee: modeled on the $5.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid); budget unreported, small-film terms | 2019 | Lead | – | – | $2,999,999 |
| Chris Rock: Tamborine no disclosed fee: modeled on the $5.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid); budget unreported, small-film terms | 2018 | Lead | – | – | $2,999,999 |
| Kevin Can Wait no disclosed fee: modeled on the $5.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid); budget unreported, small-film terms | 2018 | Lead | – | – | $2,999,999 |
| Nobody's Fool no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $5.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio) | 2018 | Supporting | $19,000,000 | $33,700,000 | $600,000 |
| The Week Of no disclosed fee: modeled on the $5.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid); budget unreported, small-film terms | 2018 | Lead | – | – | $2,999,999 |
| Sandy Wexler no disclosed fee: modeled on the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3), capped at $3.6M | 2017 | Lead | $24,300,000 | – | $3,644,997 |
| A Very Murray Christmas no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $5.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio); budget unreported, small-film terms | 2015 | Supporting | – | – | $599,999 |
| Amy Schumer: Live at the Apollo no disclosed fee: modeled on the $5.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid); budget unreported, small-film terms | 2015 | Lead | – | – | $2,999,991 |
| Bitch I'm Madonna no disclosed fee: modeled on the $5.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid); budget unreported, small-film terms | 2015 | Lead | – | – | $2,999,991 |
| Broad City no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $5.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio); budget unreported, small-film terms | 2015 | Supporting | – | – | $599,999 |
| Empire no disclosed fee: modeled on the $5.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid); budget unreported, small-film terms | 2015 | Lead | – | – | $2,999,991 |
| The Eric Andre Show no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $5.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio); budget unreported, small-film terms | 2015 | Supporting | – | – | $599,999 |
| The Jim Gaffigan Show no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $5.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio); budget unreported, small-film terms | 2015 | Supporting | – | – | $599,999 |
| Top Five no disclosed fee: modeled on the $5.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid), capped at $1.8M | 2014 | Lead | $12,000,000 | $26,100,000 | $1,799,990 |
| A.N.T. Farm no disclosed fee: modeled on the $5.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid); budget unreported, small-film terms | 2013 | Lead | – | – | $2,999,966 |
| Comedians in Cars Getting Coffee no disclosed fee: modeled on the $5.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid); budget unreported, small-film terms | 2013 | Lead | – | – | $2,999,966 |
| Grown Ups 2 no disclosed fee: modeled on the $20.0M shrunk median for 2010s/large (n=8), capped at $12.0M | 2013 | Lead | $80,000,000 | $247,000,000 | $11,999,862 |
| Madly Madagascar no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $5.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio); budget unreported, small-film terms | 2013 | Supporting | – | – | $599,994 |
| Real Husbands of Hollywood no disclosed fee: modeled on the $5.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid); budget unreported, small-film terms | 2013 | Lead | – | – | $2,999,966 |
| 2 Days in New York no disclosed fee: modeled on the $5.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid), capped at $1.3M | 2012 | Lead | $8,800,000 | $4,099,999 | $1,319,972 |
| Madagascar 3: Europe's Most Wanted no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $20.0M shrunk median for 2010s/tentpole (n=12) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio) | 2012 | Supporting | $145,000,000 | $746,900,000 | $2,399,956 |
| Tosh.0 no disclosed fee: modeled on the $5.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid); budget unreported, small-film terms | 2012 | Lead | – | – | $2,999,933 |
| What to Expect When You're Expecting no disclosed fee: modeled on the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3), capped at $5.2M | 2012 | Lead | $35,000,000 | $84,400,000 | $5,249,884 |
| The Motherfucker with the Hat no disclosed fee: modeled on the $5.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid); budget unreported, small-film terms | 2011 | Lead | – | – | $2,999,869 |
| Death at a Funeral no disclosed fee: modeled on the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3), capped at $3.1M | 2010 | Lead | $21,000,000 | $49,100,000 | $3,149,746 |
| Grown Ups no disclosed fee: modeled on the $20.0M shrunk median for 2010s/large (n=8), capped at $11.2M | 2010 | Lead | $75,000,000 | $271,400,000 | $11,249,049 |
| Good Hair no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $18.8M median for its era and nearest band (mid) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio); budget unreported, small-film terms | 2009 | Supporting | – | $4,000,000 | $2,249,693 |
| Louie no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $18.8M median for its era and nearest band (mid) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio); budget unreported, small-film terms | 2009 | Supporting | – | – | $2,249,693 |
| Merry Madagascar no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $18.8M median for its era and nearest band (mid) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio); budget unreported, small-film terms | 2009 | Supporting | – | – | $2,249,693 |
| Why We Laugh: Black Comedians on Black Comedy no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $18.8M median for its era and nearest band (mid) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio); budget unreported, small-film terms | 2009 | Supporting | – | – | $2,249,693 |
| Chris Rock: Kill the Messenger no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $18.8M median for its era and nearest band (mid) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio); budget unreported, small-film terms | 2008 | Supporting | – | – | $2,249,403 |
| Madagascar: Escape 2 Africa no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $11.8M shrunk median for 2000s/tentpole (n=9) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio) | 2008 | Supporting | $150,000,000 | $603,900,000 | $1,417,805 |
| You Don't Mess with the Zohan no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $20.0M shrunk median for 2000s/large (n=18) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio) | 2008 | Supporting | $90,000,000 | $204,000,000 | $2,399,363 |
| Bee Movie no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $11.8M shrunk median for 2000s/tentpole (n=9) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio) | 2007 | Supporting | $150,000,000 | $293,500,000 | $1,417,449 |
| Hump de Bump no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $18.8M median for its era and nearest band (mid) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio); budget unreported, small-film terms | 2007 | Supporting | – | – | $2,248,837 |
| I Think I Love My Wife no disclosed fee: modeled on the $18.8M median for its era and nearest band (mid), capped at $1.6M | 2007 | Lead | $11,000,000 | $13,196,245 | $1,649,229 |
| Mr. Warmth: The Don Rickles Project no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $18.8M median for its era and nearest band (mid) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio), capped at 15% of budget | 2007 | Supporting | $500,000 | – | $75,000 |
| Everybody Hates Chris no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $18.8M median for its era and nearest band (mid) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio); budget unreported, small-film terms | 2005 | Supporting | – | – | $2,245,596 |
| Madagascar no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $20.0M shrunk median for 2000s/large (n=18) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio) | 2005 | Supporting | $75,000,000 | $558,000,000 | $2,395,302 |
| The Aristocrats no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $18.8M median for its era and nearest band (mid) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio); budget unreported, small-film terms | 2005 | Supporting | – | $6,400,000 | $2,245,596 |
| The Longest Yard no disclosed fee: modeled on the $20.0M shrunk median for 2000s/large (n=18), capped at $12.3M | 2005 | Lead | $82,000,000 | $191,500,000 | $12,270,823 |
| Chris Rock: Never Scared no disclosed fee: modeled on the $18.8M median for its era and nearest band (mid); budget unreported, small-film terms | 2004 | Lead | – | – | $2,987,838 |
| Paparazzi no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $19.4M shrunk median for 2000s/mid (n=2) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio) | 2004 | Supporting | $20,000,000 | $16,000,000 | $2,316,156 |
| The N-Word no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $18.8M median for its era and nearest band (mid) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio); budget unreported, small-film terms | 2004 | Supporting | – | – | $2,241,442 |
| Head of State no disclosed fee: modeled on the $19.4M shrunk median for 2000s/mid (n=2), capped at $5.2M | 2003 | Lead | $35,000,000 | $38,600,000 | $5,205,604 |
| Pauly Shore Is Dead no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $18.8M median for its era and nearest band (mid) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio); budget unreported, small-film terms | 2003 | Supporting | – | $11,000 | $2,233,406 |
| The Bernie Mac Show no disclosed fee: modeled on the $18.8M median for its era and nearest band (mid); budget unreported, small-film terms | 2003 | Lead | – | – | $2,976,419 |
| Bad Company no disclosed fee: modeled on the $20.0M shrunk median for 2000s/large (n=18), capped at $10.5M | 2002 | Lead | $70,000,000 | $66,000,000 | $10,320,138 |
| Comedian no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $18.8M median for its era and nearest band (mid) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio); budget unreported, small-film terms | 2002 | Supporting | – | $2,751,988 | $2,217,962 |
| A.I. Artificial Intelligence no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $20.0M shrunk median for 2000s/large (n=18) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio) | 2001 | Supporting | $95,000,000 | $235,900,000 | $2,334,554 |
| Down to Earth no disclosed fee: modeled on the $19.4M shrunk median for 2000s/mid (n=2), capped at $5.9M | 2001 | Lead | $39,500,000 | $71,200,000 | $5,737,597 |
| Jay and Silent Bob Strike Back no disclosed fee: modeled on the $19.4M shrunk median for 2000s/mid (n=2), capped at $3.3M | 2001 | Lead | $22,000,000 | $33,800,000 | $3,203,015 |
| Osmosis Jones no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $20.0M shrunk median for 2000s/large (n=18) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio) | 2001 | Supporting | $70,000,000 | $14,000,000 | $2,334,554 |
| Pootie Tang no disclosed fee: modeled on the $18.8M median for its era and nearest band (mid), capped at $1.1M | 2001 | Lead | $7,000,000 | $3,300,000 | $1,029,979 |
| DAG no disclosed fee: modeled on the $18.8M median for its era and nearest band (mid); budget unreported, small-film terms | 2000 | Lead | – | – | $2,835,547 |
| Nurse Betty no disclosed fee: modeled on the $19.4M shrunk median for 2000s/mid (n=2), capped at $3.8M | 2000 | Lead | $25,000,000 | $29,400,000 | $3,537,835 |
| Chris Rock: Bigger & Blacker no disclosed fee: modeled on the $10.0M shrunk median for 1990s/small (n=1); budget unreported, small-film terms | 1999 | Lead | – | – | $2,672,192 |
| Dogma no disclosed fee: modeled on the $10.0M shrunk median for 1990s/small (n=1), capped at $1.5M | 1999 | Lead | $10,000,000 | $45,000,000 | $1,350,996 |
| Jackie's Back no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $10.0M shrunk median for 1990s/small (n=1) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio); budget unreported, small-film terms | 1999 | Supporting | – | – | $1,086,757 |
| No Sex (In the Champagne Room) no disclosed fee: modeled on the $10.0M shrunk median for 1990s/small (n=1); budget unreported, small-film terms | 1999 | Lead | – | – | $2,672,192 |
| Torrance Rises no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $10.0M shrunk median for 1990s/small (n=1) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio); budget unreported, small-film terms | 1999 | Supporting | – | – | $1,086,757 |
| Dr. Dolittle soft-breakthrough supporting blend (w=0.79) | 1998 | Supporting | $71,500,000 | $294,400,000 | $1,462,660 |
| Vua đồi soft-breakthrough supporting blend (w=0.79) | 1998 | Supporting | – | – | $1,001,822 |
| Lethal Weapon 4 soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.79): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $12.8M shrunk median for 1990s/tentpole (n=1) vs early terms | 1998 | Lead | $125,000,000 | $285,400,000 | $10,223,119 |
| Mr. Show with Bob and David soft-breakthrough supporting blend (w=0.79) | 1998 | Supporting | – | – | $1,001,822 |
| "Champagne" soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.66): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $10.0M shrunk median for 1990s/small (n=1); budget unreported, small-film terms vs early terms | 1997 | Lead | – | – | $2,067,080 |
| Beverly Hills Ninja soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.66): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $10.0M shrunk median for 1990s/small (n=1), capped at $2.7M vs early terms | 1997 | Lead | $18,000,000 | $37,900,000 | $1,868,853 |
| Happily Ever After: Fairy Tales for Every Child soft-breakthrough supporting blend (w=0.66) | 1997 | Supporting | – | – | $877,719 |
| Howard Stern soft-breakthrough supporting blend (w=0.66) | 1997 | Supporting | – | – | $877,719 |
| The Chris Rock Show soft-breakthrough supporting blend (w=0.66) | 1997 | Supporting | – | – | $877,719 |
| Chris Rock: Bring the Pain soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.50): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $10.0M shrunk median for 1990s/small (n=1); budget unreported, small-film terms vs early terms | 1996 | Lead | – | – | $1,625,000 |
| Homicide: Life on the Street soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.50): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $10.0M shrunk median for 1990s/small (n=1); budget unreported, small-film terms vs early terms | 1996 | Lead | – | – | $1,625,000 |
| Martin soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.50): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $10.0M shrunk median for 1990s/small (n=1); budget unreported, small-film terms vs early terms | 1996 | Lead | – | – | $1,625,000 |
| Politically Incorrect soft-breakthrough supporting blend (w=0.50) | 1996 | Supporting | – | – | $725,000 |
| Saturday Night Live soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.50): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $10.0M shrunk median for 1990s/small (n=1); budget unreported, small-film terms vs early terms | 1996 | Lead | – | – | $1,625,000 |
| Sgt. Bilko soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.50): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $14.4M shrunk median for 1990s/mid (n=6), capped at $5.8M vs early terms | 1996 | Lead | $39,000,000 | $37,956,793 | $3,104,688 |
| Panther soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.34): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $10.0M shrunk median for 1990s/small (n=1), capped at $1.1M vs early terms | 1995 | Lead | $7,500,000 | $8,000,000 | $546,838 |
| The Fresh Prince of Bel-Air soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.34): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $10.0M shrunk median for 1990s/small (n=1); budget unreported, small-film terms vs early terms | 1995 | Lead | – | – | $1,182,920 |
| The Immortals soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.34): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $10.0M shrunk median for 1990s/small (n=1); budget unreported, small-film terms vs early terms | 1995 | Lead | – | – | $1,182,920 |
| The Moxy Show soft-breakthrough supporting blend (w=0.34) | 1995 | Supporting | – | – | $572,281 |
| HBO Comedy Half-Hour soft-breakthrough supporting blend (w=0.21) | 1994 | Supporting | – | – | $448,178 |
| CB4 no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $10.0M shrunk median for 1990s/small (n=1) (pre-stardom rate); soft-breakthrough weight 0.12 | 1993 | Lead | $6,000,000 | $17,900,000 | $327,482 |
| Boomerang no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $14.4M shrunk median for 1990s/mid (n=6) (pre-stardom rate); soft-breakthrough weight 0.06 | 1992 | Lead | $42,000,000 | $131,000,000 | $745,332 |
| New Jack City no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $10.0M shrunk median for 1990s/small (n=1) (pre-stardom rate); soft-breakthrough weight 0.03 | 1991 | Lead | $8,000,000 | $47,600,000 | $282,723 |
| Rob Base no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $4.1M shrunk median for pre1990/small (n=2) (pre-stardom rate); budget unreported, small-film terms; soft-breakthrough weight 0.01 | 1989 | Lead | – | – | $130,112 |
| Smooth Operator (Big Daddy Kane song) no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $4.1M shrunk median for pre1990/small (n=2) (pre-stardom rate); budget unreported, small-film terms | 1989 | Supporting | – | – | $106,776 |
| Who Is Chris Rock? no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $4.1M shrunk median for pre1990/small (n=2) (pre-stardom rate); budget unreported, small-film terms | 1989 | Supporting | – | – | $106,776 |
| Comedy's Dirtiest Dozen no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $4.1M shrunk median for pre1990/small (n=2) (pre-stardom rate); budget unreported, small-film terms | 1988 | Supporting | – | – | $105,008 |
| I'm Gonna Git You Sucka no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $2.8M median for its era and nearest band (small) (pre-stardom rate); soft-breakthrough weight 0.00 | 1988 | Lead | $3,000,000 | $13,000,000 | $70,582 |
| Beverly Hills Cop II no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $6.3M shrunk median for pre1990/mid (n=4) (pre-stardom rate); soft-breakthrough weight 0.00 | 1987 | Lead | $27,000,000 | $300,000,000 | $167,956 |
| In Living Color no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $4.1M shrunk median for pre1990/small (n=2) (pre-stardom rate); budget unreported, small-film terms; soft-breakthrough weight 0.00 | 1987 | Lead | – | – | $110,288 |
| Miami Vice no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $4.1M shrunk median for pre1990/small (n=2) (pre-stardom rate); budget unreported, small-film terms; soft-breakthrough weight 0.00 | 1987 | Lead | – | – | $110,288 |
| Saturday Night Live no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $4.1M shrunk median for pre1990/small (n=2) (pre-stardom rate); budget unreported, small-film terms; soft-breakthrough weight 0.00 | 1987 | Lead | – | – | $110,288 |
| Krush Groove no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $2.8M median for its era and nearest band (small) (pre-stardom rate) | 1985 | Supporting | $3,000,000 | $11,000,000 | $68,921 |
Các số liệu được mô hình hóa hoạt động như thế nào. An undisclosed lead role after the breakthrough gets the median of disclosed lead salaries for its era and budget band, capped at 15% of the film’s budget. Supporting and pre-breakthrough roles get 2.5% of that median, the documented going rate for actors before stardom. Films with no reported budget are treated as small productions. Undocumented backend, endorsements, and producer or director credits enter as separate estimated lines in the calculation above, built from disclosed medians. Every median comes from the published tables on our trang phương pháp.
Tài sản ròng Over Time
Số dư theo mô hình vào cuối mỗi năm, phù hợp với bảng theo từng năm dưới đây.
Từng năm
| Year | Income | Phí đại diện | Thuế suất | Spent | Saved | Balance |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | $4,342,574 | $651,386 | 45% | $1,119,021 | $911,133 | $165,617,247 |
| 2025 | $6,142,116 | $921,317 | 45% | $1,582,737 | $1,288,702 | $161,437,015 |
| 2024 | $4,057,619 | $608,643 | 45% | $1,045,592 | $851,345 | $149,274,974 |
| 2023 | $7,236,270 | $1,085,440 | 45% | $1,864,685 | $1,518,271 | $137,433,931 |
| 2022 | $11,499,745 | $1,724,962 | 45% | $2,963,323 | $2,412,807 | $124,749,175 |
| 2021 | $10,395,628 | $1,559,344 | 45% | $2,678,808 | $2,181,148 | $131,281,213 |
| 2020 | $7,519,675 | $1,127,951 | 45% | $1,937,715 | $1,577,733 | $119,074,195 |
| 2019 | $6,593,138 | $988,971 | 45% | $1,698,959 | $1,383,333 | $109,369,845 |
| 2018 | $9,218,192 | $1,382,729 | 45% | $2,375,399 | $1,934,106 | $97,600,546 |
| 2017 | $6,154,652 | $923,198 | 47% | $1,528,296 | $1,244,375 | $95,110,992 |
| 2016 | $1,799,959 | $269,994 | 47% | $446,958 | $363,924 | $87,227,432 |
| 2015 | $9,133,650 | $1,370,047 | 47% | $2,268,028 | $1,846,682 | $82,571,916 |
| 2014 | $5,906,630 | $885,994 | 47% | $1,466,708 | $1,194,228 | $78,810,725 |
| 2013 | $16,736,035 | $2,510,405 | 47% | $4,155,819 | $3,383,765 | $73,149,960 |
| 2012 | $15,889,480 | $2,383,422 | 43% | $4,243,387 | $3,455,066 | $63,889,890 |
| 2011 | $6,735,707 | $1,010,356 | 43% | $1,798,814 | $1,464,636 | $56,651,629 |
| 2010 | $11,851,079 | $1,777,662 | 43% | $3,164,907 | $2,576,941 | $53,146,179 |
| 2009 | $11,203,136 | $1,680,470 | 43% | $2,991,869 | $2,436,050 | $47,335,900 |
| 2008 | $7,626,171 | $1,143,926 | 43% | $2,036,618 | $1,658,262 | $40,984,545 |
| 2007 | $6,441,130 | $966,169 | 43% | $1,720,145 | $1,400,582 | $43,229,947 |
| 2006 | $2,474,026 | $371,104 | 43% | $660,704 | $537,961 | $40,015,464 |
| 2005 | $14,116,131 | $2,117,420 | 43% | $3,769,803 | $3,069,462 | $37,016,246 |
| 2004 | $11,537,183 | $1,730,577 | 43% | $3,081,078 | $2,508,687 | $32,753,887 |
| 2003 | $10,157,522 | $1,523,628 | 43% | $2,712,631 | $2,208,688 | $28,686,859 |
| 2002 | $12,533,210 | $1,879,982 | 46% | $3,170,912 | $2,581,831 | $24,114,772 |
| 2001 | $14,615,035 | $2,192,255 | 46% | $3,697,615 | $3,010,685 | $22,201,884 |
| 2000 | $9,625,819 | $1,443,873 | 46% | $2,435,340 | $1,982,911 | $19,199,454 |
| 1999 | $12,874,731 | $1,931,210 | 46% | $3,257,317 | $2,652,184 | $16,948,836 |
| 1998 | $16,747,610 | $2,512,142 | 46% | $4,237,159 | $3,449,994 | $13,349,037 |
| 1997 | $13,073,827 | $1,961,074 | 46% | $3,307,689 | $2,693,198 | $8,955,917 |
| 1996 | $13,658,903 | $2,048,835 | 46% | $3,455,713 | $2,813,723 | $5,597,937 |
| 1995 | $5,842,605 | $876,391 | 46% | $1,478,184 | $1,203,572 | $2,580,639 |
| 1994 | $1,663,440 | $249,516 | 46% | $420,852 | $342,667 | $1,212,720 |
| 1993 | $657,285 | $98,593 | 46% | $203,462 | $98,232 | $854,534 |
| 1992 | $835,758 | $125,364 | 36% | $250,604 | $204,048 | $714,466 |
| 1991 | $609,012 | $91,352 | 36% | $182,614 | $148,689 | $486,464 |
| 1990 | $272,323 | $40,848 | 36% | $99,908 | $48,236 | $302,865 |
| 1989 | $428,070 | $64,211 | 36% | $157,048 | $75,823 | $247,966 |
| 1988 | $405,796 | $60,869 | 36% | $148,876 | $71,877 | $154,272 |
| 1987 | $403,435 | $60,515 | 45% | $127,196 | $61,410 | $76,949 |
| 1986 | $151,230 | $22,684 | 55% | $45,628 | $12,217 | $14,991 |
| 1985 | $68,921 | $10,338 | 55% | $23,810 | $2,552 | $2,552 |
Model Notes
- PROXY CƯ TRÚ: nơi cư trú không có nguồn riêng lẻ cho đợt này; Mặc định US-CA được áp dụng cho đến khi được ghi lại
- salary comps: 2 disclosed lead fee(s) flagged as non-market outliers (scale / far-below-quote) and excluded from era medians
- Tín dụng hình ảnh: Wikimedia Commons via Wikipedia (Chris Rock)
Tái tạo số này. Ước tính giá trị ròng phải được tái tạo theo cách của một phát hiện khoa học: cùng một đầu vào công khai và cùng một tỷ lệ được công bố sẽ luôn đưa ra cùng một câu trả lời. Ngân sách phim và doanh thu phòng vé là báo cáo công khai. Mọi mức lương, mức phí, thuế suất, tỷ lệ tiết kiệm và lợi nhuận chuẩn được tiết lộ đều được công bố kèm theo trích dẫn trên trang web của chúng tôi. trang phương pháp. Undisclosed lead roles use the median of disclosed salaries for their era and budget band, capped at 15% of the film’s budget. Supporting and early-career roles use the documented pre-stardom fraction of that median. Undocumented backend, endorsements, and hyphenate credits enter as estimated lines from disclosed medians. Apply the rates year by year as shown above and you will land on $165.6 Million.
Phương pháp luận
We rebuild Chris’s career as a yearly time series. Disclosed salaries and documented backend enter as reported, with citations. Undisclosed lead roles get the median of disclosed salaries for their era and budget band, capped at 15% of the film’s budget. Supporting roles and roles from before the breakthrough get 2.5% of that median, the going-rate ratio measured from disclosed pre-stardom deals. Films with no reported budget are treated as small productions, and every role is estimated unless a source documents it was unpaid. Representation fees come out at sourced rates, taxes follow the eras actually lived through, spending follows measured household savings behavior unless court documents say otherwise, and what remains compounds at real market returns. Undocumented backend enters as an expected value from disclosed deals, endorsements at the median disclosed ambassador fee, and producer or director credits at union-scale floors.
Mô hình đầy đủ, mọi bảng giá và cách kiểm tra ước tính của chúng tôi so với các giao dịch thực đều có sẵn trên trang phương pháp.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is Chris Rock's net worth in 2026?
As of 2026, Chris Rock's net worth is an estimated $165.6 Million. The estimate is built film by film from disclosed salaries and documented backend, then year by year: income, minus representation fees and taxes, minus spending, compounded at real market returns.
How does Chris Rock make money?
Lương quay phim và sự tham gia phụ trợ được ghi lại.
How is Chris Rock's net worth calculated?
Ngày trả lương được tiết lộ nhập như đã báo cáo, kèm theo trích dẫn. Các vai chính không được tiết lộ sử dụng mức lương trung bình được tiết lộ cho thời đại và ngân sách của họ, giới hạn ở mức 15% kinh phí của bộ phim và các vai phụ hoặc vai mới bắt đầu sự nghiệp sử dụng phần tiền nổi tiếng được ghi nhận của mức trung bình đó. Chúng tôi trừ đi các khoản phí đại diện có nguồn gốc, thuế trong những năm Chris thực sự làm việc và chi tiêu từ hành vi tiết kiệm được đo lường, sau đó gộp lại theo lợi nhuận thị trường thực. Phần phụ trợ, xác nhận và sản xuất tín dụng không có giấy tờ được nhập dưới dạng dòng ước tính từ mức trung bình được tiết lộ. Mọi tỷ lệ và nguồn đều được công bố.
How much does Chris Rock make per film?
Nó thay đổi tùy theo vai trò và thời đại, đồng thời bảng theo từng phim ở trên liệt kê mức thù lao được tính cho mỗi tựa phim. Ngày trả lương được tiết lộ nhập như đã báo cáo. Các vai diễn không được tiết lộ được mô phỏng từ những gì các diễn viên có thể so sánh kiếm được trong cùng thời đại và phạm vi ngân sách, với các vai chính sau bước đột phá kiếm được nhiều tiền nhất và các vai phụ hoặc vai phụ chỉ là một phần nhỏ trong số đó.
Tại sao thuế suất cao như vậy và các tác nhân không né tránh việc này với một công ty cho vay?
Thuế được tính theo mức hiệu quả tại nơi Chris sống mỗi năm, là mức được hiển thị trong bảng từng năm. Ở một tiểu bang có mức thuế cao như California, thuế thu nhập liên bang và tiểu bang kết hợp đạt gần một nửa thu nhập của người có thu nhập cao nhất, vì vậy những năm đó rơi vào khoảng giữa 40%. Một công ty cho vay, tập đoàn mà nhiều thành viên quản lý thu nhập của họ, không giảm thuế đối với số tiền họ mang về nhà. Ưu điểm thực sự của nó là khấu trừ các chi phí kinh doanh như phí đại lý, người quản lý và luật sư, đồng thời mô hình này đã trừ các chi phí đó thành một dòng riêng trước khi áp dụng bất kỳ khoản thuế nào. Những người có thu nhập cao cũng nằm ngoài khoản khấu trừ kinh doanh chuyển tiếp mà các chủ sở hữu công ty khác có thể yêu cầu, vì vậy họ không được giảm lãi suất.
Tại sao con số này khác với các trang web có giá trị ròng khác?
Most sites publish a single number with no way to check it. This estimate is built in the open: every salary, rate, and assumption is on the page, and the trang phương pháp lists every source.
Ước tính này chính xác đến mức nào?
Không có ước tính giá trị ròng nào cho một cá nhân là chính xác; đây là một mô hình được xây dựng từ dữ liệu công cộng. Sự khác biệt là bạn có thể xem nó được xây dựng như thế nào và kiểm tra từng bước. Mức độ tin cậy ở gần đầu phép tính cho biết con số dựa trên các con số được tiết lộ bao nhiêu và trang đánh dấu nơi con số dựa trên một giả định.
Is Chris Rock rich compared to the average person?
Yes. A net worth of $165.6 Million is far above the median American household, which sits near $193,000 according to Federal Reserve data.
What is Chris Rock's biggest source of wealth?
On this page it is film salaries, the largest line in the calculation at $190.7 Million. The full breakdown, with every other line and its source, is above.
How much does Chris Rock make from endorsements?
The model counts $16.0 Million in career endorsement income for Chris: 1 named partnerships x the $4.0M annual fee from the median disclosed film deal x a 4-year term, spread across the deal years. It is an estimate, since the individual deal values are not all public, and it sits as its own line in the calculation above.
Khám phá các diễn viên khác
Chris Rock
Angelina Jolie
Bruce Willis
Christian Bale
Emma Watson
Hugh Jackman
Jason Statham
Jennifer Aniston
Jennifer Garner
Jodie Foster
Johnny Depp
Julia Roberts
Leonardo DiCaprio
Margot Robbie
Matt Damon
Mila Kunis
Morgan Freeman
Natalie Portman
Samuel L. Jackson
Sandra Bullock
Scarlett Johansson
Sylvester Stallone
Tom Hanks
Giới thiệu về NetWorth Explained
We originally created NWE because nobody in the public-figure net worth space showed their work. Magazines and sites threw out big numbers while hiding behind vague claims of “proprietary algorithms” hoặc “insider knowledge.” That’s why we started the world’s only publication that transparently showed every assumption, every variable, and every calculation. We’re still the only ones who do it this way. Đọc thêm về NetWorth Explained.