Dakota Fanning Tài sản ròng 2026
Cập nhật lần cuối August 3, 2026
As of 2026, Dakota Fanning has an estimated net worth of $204.1 Million, computed film by film and year by year from public records and published rates. Every input, rate, and source behind the number is on this page.
Calculation
- Mức lương được tiết lộ và phần phụ trợ được ghi lại, mỗi phần đều có trích dẫn
- Các vai trò không được tiết lộ được mô phỏng từ những vai trò có thể so sánh được tiết lộ cho thời đại, mức ngân sách và giai đoạn sự nghiệp của họ
- Phần phụ trợ, chứng thực và tạo ra các khoản tín dụng ước tính từ mức trung bình được tiết lộ
Fast Facts
| Birthdate | February 23, 1994 |
|---|---|
| Birthplace | Conyers |
| Breakthrough | I Am Sam (2001) |
| Best Known | War of the Worlds (2005) |
Who Is Dakota Fanning?
Dakota Fanning was born February 23, 1994 in Conyers, best known for War of the Worlds (2005). The earnings behind Dakota's net worth come from film salaries, backend participation, and endorsement deals.
The model tracks Dakota's earning years from 1999 to 2026, with the biggest single year in 2024 at about $37.4 Million of gross income. After representation fees, taxes, and living costs, what stays invested compounds at market returns into an estimated $204.1 Million today.
Data
Mỗi dòng bên dưới được tính toán từ dữ liệu công khai và bảng giá được công bố trên trang của chúng tôi trang phương pháp. Sự tự tin: hạng C. Các số liệu được ghi lại chỉ bao gồm một phần nhỏ của con số này, vì vậy hầu hết nó được mô hình hóa từ các tỷ lệ đã công bố và các điểm so sánh (các điểm chạy từ A, hầu hết được ghi lại, đến C, chủ yếu được mô hình hóa).
The Calculation
| Line | Amount |
|---|---|
| Revenue | |
| Film pay, modeled lead roles (58 of 74 films) era and budget-band medians of disclosed lead salaries (winsorized, thin cells shrunk toward the era median), blended with this actor's disclosed quote history when available; soft breakthrough blend near the career break year | $348,966,741 |
| Film pay, modeled post-breakthrough supporting roles (10 of 74 films) 12.0% of lead cells: lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio | $18,664,871 |
| Film pay, modeled supporting and early roles (6 of 74 films) 2,5% mức trung bình của thời đại: tỷ lệ trước khi trở thành ngôi sao | $14,133,096 |
| Điểm phụ trợ, ước tính 12% of disclosed lead deals included points, at a median 2.6% of box office; expected value on 48 commercially viable undisclosed lead roles; cash spread over 3 years; 23 film(s) used band-specific box-office/budget multiples as a gross proxy | $22,021,917 |
| Chứng thực, ước tính (1 quan hệ đối tác thương hiệu) 1 named partnerships x the $4.0M annual fee from the median disclosed film deal x a 4-year term, spread across the deal years | $16,000,000 |
| Số dư, ước tính SAG residual rates on post-theatrical receipts assumed at half of box office, split by role share and spread over the ten years after each release; 37 film(s) used band-specific box-office proxies | $46,428,076 |
| TV: ER Delia Chadsey; guest default per credited year; broadcast network family; priced from tv_episode_rates.csv (en.wikipedia.org) | $30,000 |
| TV: Ally McBeal Ally (5 years old); guest default per credited year; broadcast network family; priced from tv_episode_rates.csv (en.wikipedia.org) | $30,000 |
| TV: Strong Medicine Edie's Girl; guest default per credited year; cable network family; priced from tv_episode_rates.csv (en.wikipedia.org) | $30,000 |
| TV: CSI: Crime Scene Investigation Brenda Collins; guest default per credited year; broadcast network family; priced from tv_episode_rates.csv (en.wikipedia.org) | $30,000 |
| TV: The Practice Alessa Engel; guest default per credited year; broadcast network family; priced from tv_episode_rates.csv (en.wikipedia.org) | $30,000 |
| TV: Spin City Cindy; guest default per credited year; broadcast network family; priced from tv_episode_rates.csv (en.wikipedia.org) | $30,000 |
| TV: Malcolm in the Middle Emily; guest default per credited year; broadcast network family; priced from tv_episode_rates.csv (en.wikipedia.org) | $30,000 |
| TV: The Fighting Fitzgeralds Marie; guest default per credited year; broadcast network family; priced from tv_episode_rates.csv (en.wikipedia.org) | $30,000 |
| TV: Family Guy Little Girl; guest default per credited year; animation format tier; priced from tv_episode_rates.csv (en.wikipedia.org) | $24,000 |
| TV: The Ellen Show Young Ellen; guest default per credited year; broadcast network family; priced from tv_episode_rates.csv (en.wikipedia.org) | $30,000 |
| TV: Taken Allie Keys; stated episode count; network not identified, priced on the broadcast cell; priced from tv_episode_rates.csv (en.wikipedia.org) | $1,500,000 |
| TV: Kim Possible: A Sitch in Time Young Kim Possible; one engagement for a television film or special; animation format tier; priced from tv_episode_rates.csv (en.wikipedia.org) | $35,000 |
| TV: Justice League Unlimited Young Wonder Woman; guest default per credited year; animation format tier; priced from tv_episode_rates.csv (en.wikipedia.org) | $24,000 |
| TV: Friends Mackenzie; guest default per credited year; broadcast network family; priced from tv_episode_rates.csv (en.wikipedia.org) | $30,000 |
| TV: The Alienist Sara Howard; stated episode count; cable network family; priced from tv_episode_rates.csv (en.wikipedia.org) | $6,300,000 |
| TV: Gen:Lock Miranda Worth; stated episode count; animation format tier; priced from tv_episode_rates.csv (en.wikipedia.org) | $490,350 |
| TV: The First Lady Susan Ford Bales; stated episode count; network not identified, priced on the broadcast cell; priced from tv_episode_rates.csv (en.wikipedia.org) | $1,750,000 |
| TV: Ripley Marge Sherwood; stated episode count; streaming network family; priced from tv_episode_rates.csv (en.wikipedia.org) | $600,000 |
| TV: The Perfect Couple Abby Winbury; stated episode count; streaming network family; priced from tv_episode_rates.csv (en.wikipedia.org) | $450,000 |
| TV: Mastermind: To Think Like a Killer credited role; guest default per credited year; streaming network family; priced from tv_episode_rates.csv (en.wikipedia.org) | $30,000 |
| TV: Death in Apartment 603: What Happened to Ellen Greenberg? credited role; guest default per credited year; streaming network family; priced from tv_episode_rates.csv (en.wikipedia.org) | $30,000 |
| TV: All Her Fault Jenny Kaminski; stated episode count; streaming network family; priced from tv_episode_rates.csv (en.wikipedia.org) | $600,000 |
| TV: Margo's Got Money Troubles credited role; guest default per credited year; streaming network family; priced from tv_episode_rates.csv (en.wikipedia.org) | $30,000 |
| Lợi tức đầu tư từ tiền tiết kiệm mixed portfolio: 55% actual 60/40 securities returns (taxed) + 45% US long-run home-price rate on the rest | $105,013,464 |
| Expenses | |
| Phí đại diện đại lý 10% + luật sư 5% | -$70,206,657 |
| Taxes Tỷ lệ hiệu quả của US-CA, theo từng năm | -$176,997,164 |
| Chi tiêu cá nhân measured household savings rates by income, times a 88% entertainment-household factor | -$121,727,316 |
| Giá trị ròng ước tính | $204,126,706 |
Phim theo phim
| Film | Year | Role | Budget | Phòng vé | Tính lương |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Margo's Got Money Troubles no disclosed fee: modeled on the $23.8M shrunk median for 2020s/large (n=2), capped at $10.5M | 2026 | Lead | $70,000,000 | – | $10,499,999 |
| The Sun Never Sets no disclosed fee: modeled on the $23.8M shrunk median for 2020s/large (n=2), capped at $10.5M | 2026 | Lead | $70,000,000 | – | $10,499,999 |
| All Her Fault no disclosed fee: modeled on the $23.8M shrunk median for 2020s/large (n=2), capped at $10.5M | 2025 | Lead | $70,000,000 | – | $10,499,999 |
| Death in Apartment 603: What Happened to Ellen Greenberg? no disclosed fee: modeled on the $23.8M shrunk median for 2020s/large (n=2), capped at $10.5M | 2025 | Lead | $70,000,000 | – | $10,499,999 |
| Vicious no disclosed fee: modeled on the $23.8M shrunk median for 2020s/large (n=2), capped at $10.5M | 2025 | Lead | $70,000,000 | – | $10,499,999 |
| Mastermind: To Think Like a Killer no disclosed fee: modeled on the $23.8M shrunk median for 2020s/large (n=2), capped at $10.5M | 2024 | Lead | $70,000,000 | – | $10,499,998 |
| Ripley no disclosed fee: modeled on the $23.8M shrunk median for 2020s/large (n=2), capped at $10.5M | 2024 | Lead | $70,000,000 | – | $10,499,998 |
| The Perfect Couple no disclosed fee: modeled on the $23.8M shrunk median for 2020s/large (n=2), capped at $10.5M | 2024 | Lead | $70,000,000 | – | $10,499,998 |
| The Watchers no disclosed fee: modeled on the $21.7M shrunk median for 2020s/mid (n=1), capped at $4.5M | 2024 | Lead | $30,000,000 | $33,400,000 | $4,499,999 |
| The Equalizer 3 no disclosed fee: modeled on the $23.8M shrunk median for 2020s/large (n=2), capped at $10.5M | 2023 | Lead | $70,000,000 | $182,800,000 | $10,499,996 |
| The First Lady no disclosed fee: modeled on the $23.8M shrunk median for 2020s/large (n=2), capped at $10.5M | 2022 | Lead | $70,000,000 | – | $10,499,992 |
| Viena and the Fantomes no disclosed fee: modeled on the $23.8M shrunk median for 2020s/large (n=2), capped at $10.5M | 2020 | Lead | $70,000,000 | – | $10,499,969 |
| Once Upon a Time in Hollywood no disclosed fee: modeled on the $20.0M shrunk median for 2010s/large (n=8), capped at $13.9M | 2019 | Lead | $93,000,000 | $374,343,626 | $13,949,917 |
| Sweetness in the Belly no disclosed fee: modeled on the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3), capped at $6.0M | 2019 | Lead | $40,000,000 | – | $5,999,965 |
| Ocean's 8 no disclosed fee: modeled on the $20.0M shrunk median for 2010s/large (n=8), capped at $10.5M | 2018 | Lead | $70,000,000 | $297,718,711 | $10,499,880 |
| Please Stand By no disclosed fee: modeled on the $5.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid), capped at $0.1M | 2017 | Lead | $406,732 | $406,732 | $61,010 |
| Zygote no disclosed fee: modeled on the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3), capped at $6.0M | 2017 | Lead | $40,000,000 | – | $5,999,867 |
| American Pastoral no disclosed fee: modeled on the $5.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid), capped at $1.5M | 2016 | Lead | $10,000,000 | $1,700,000 | $1,499,938 |
| Brimstone no disclosed fee: modeled on the $5.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid), capped at $0.3M | 2016 | Lead | $2,100,000 | $2,100,000 | $314,991 |
| The Escape no disclosed fee: modeled on the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3), capped at $6.0M | 2016 | Lead | $40,000,000 | – | $5,999,740 |
| The Benefactor no disclosed fee: modeled on the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3), capped at $6.0M | 2015 | Lead | $40,000,000 | $2,100,000 | $5,999,494 |
| Effie Gray no disclosed fee: modeled on the $5.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid), capped at $1.6M | 2014 | Lead | $11,000,000 | $721,143 | $1,649,737 |
| Every Secret Thing no disclosed fee: modeled on the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3), capped at $6.0M | 2014 | Lead | $40,000,000 | $103,536 | $5,999,014 |
| Yellowbird no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $5.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio) | 2014 | Supporting | $13,285,008 | $3,800,000 | $599,918 |
| Night Moves no disclosed fee: modeled on the $5.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid), capped at $0.1M | 2013 | Lead | $858,513 | $858,513 | $128,776 |
| The Last of Robin Hood no disclosed fee: modeled on the $5.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid), capped at $0.0M | 2013 | Lead | $288,545 | $288,545 | $43,282 |
| Very Good Girls no disclosed fee: modeled on the $5.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid), capped at $0.0M | 2013 | Lead | $6,940 | $6,940 | $1,041 |
| Celia no disclosed fee: modeled on the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3), capped at $6.0M | 2012 | Lead | $40,000,000 | – | $5,996,262 |
| Now Is Good no disclosed fee: modeled on the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3), capped at $6.0M | 2012 | Lead | $40,000,000 | $2,300,000 | $5,996,262 |
| The Motel Life no disclosed fee: modeled on the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3), capped at $6.0M | 2012 | Lead | $40,000,000 | – | $5,996,262 |
| The Twilight Saga: Breaking Dawn – Part 2 no disclosed fee: modeled on the $20.0M shrunk median for 2010s/tentpole (n=12) | 2012 | Lead | $136,000,000 | $868,000,000 | $19,987,267 |
| The Runaways no disclosed fee: modeled on the $5.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid), capped at $1.5M | 2010 | Lead | $10,000,000 | $4,600,000 | $1,496,600 |
| The Twilight Saga: Eclipse no disclosed fee: modeled on the $20.0M shrunk median for 2010s/large (n=8), capped at $10.2M | 2010 | Lead | $68,000,000 | $699,000,000 | $10,176,016 |
| Coraline no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $20.0M shrunk median for 2000s/large (n=18) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio) | 2009 | Supporting | $60,000,000 | $188,100,000 | $2,390,871 |
| Coraline: The Game no disclosed fee: modeled on the $19.4M shrunk median for 2000s/mid (n=2), capped at $6.0M | 2009 | Lead | $40,000,000 | – | $5,973,499 |
| Push no disclosed fee: modeled on the $19.4M shrunk median for 2000s/mid (n=2), capped at $5.7M | 2009 | Lead | $38,000,000 | $48,900,000 | $5,674,940 |
| The Twilight Saga: New Moon no disclosed fee: modeled on the $20.0M shrunk median for 2000s/large (n=18), capped at $7.5M | 2009 | Lead | $50,000,000 | $712,000,000 | $7,466,367 |
| Winged Creatures no disclosed fee: modeled on the $19.4M shrunk median for 2000s/mid (n=2), capped at $6.0M | 2009 | Lead | $40,000,000 | $39,171 | $5,973,499 |
| The Secret Life of Bees (film) no disclosed fee: modeled on the $18.8M median for its era and nearest band (mid), capped at $1.6M | 2008 | Lead | $11,000,000 | $40,000,000 | $1,638,996 |
| Cutlass no disclosed fee: modeled on the $19.4M shrunk median for 2000s/mid (n=2), capped at $6.0M | 2007 | Lead | $40,000,000 | – | $5,900,795 |
| Hounddog no disclosed fee: modeled on the $18.8M median for its era and nearest band (mid), capped at $0.6M | 2007 | Lead | $4,000,000 | $131,961 | $597,639 |
| Charlotte's Web no disclosed fee: modeled on the $20.0M shrunk median for 2000s/large (n=18), capped at $12.8M | 2006 | Lead | $85,000,000 | $148,900,000 | $12,328,046 |
| Dreamer no disclosed fee: modeled on the $19.4M shrunk median for 2000s/mid (n=2), capped at $4.8M | 2005 | Lead | $32,000,000 | $39,500,000 | $4,519,617 |
| Hide and Seek no disclosed fee: modeled on the $19.4M shrunk median for 2000s/mid (n=2), capped at $3.8M | 2005 | Lead | $25,000,000 | $127,400,000 | $3,537,835 |
| Lilo & Stitch 2: Stitch Has a Glitch no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $19.4M shrunk median for 2000s/mid (n=2) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio) | 2005 | Supporting | $40,000,000 | – | $2,205,416 |
| Nine Lives no disclosed fee: modeled on the $18.8M median for its era and nearest band (mid), capped at $0.1M | 2005 | Lead | $500,000 | $1,500,000 | $75,000 |
| War of the Worlds no disclosed fee: modeled on the $11.8M shrunk median for 2000s/tentpole (n=9) | 2005 | Lead | $132,000,000 | $603,900,000 | $11,069,560 |
| Friends no disclosed fee: modeled on the $19.4M shrunk median for 2000s/mid (n=2), capped at $6.0M | 2004 | Lead | $40,000,000 | – | $5,342,521 |
| Gen:Lock no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $19.4M shrunk median for 2000s/mid (n=2) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio) | 2004 | Supporting | $40,000,000 | – | $2,105,592 |
| In the Realms of the Unreal no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $19.4M shrunk median for 2000s/mid (n=2) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio) | 2004 | Supporting | $40,000,000 | – | $2,105,592 |
| Justice League Unlimited no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $19.4M shrunk median for 2000s/mid (n=2) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio) | 2004 | Supporting | $40,000,000 | – | $2,105,592 |
| Man on Fire no disclosed fee: modeled on the $20.0M shrunk median for 2000s/large (n=18), capped at $10.5M | 2004 | Lead | $70,000,000 | $130,834,852 | $9,307,971 |
| My Neighbor Totoro no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $19.4M shrunk median for 2000s/mid (n=2) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio) | 2004 | Supporting | $40,000,000 | – | $2,105,592 |
| The Alienist no disclosed fee: modeled on the $19.4M shrunk median for 2000s/mid (n=2), capped at $6.0M | 2004 | Lead | $40,000,000 | – | $5,342,521 |
| Kim Possible: A Sitch in Time soft-breakthrough supporting blend (w=0.79) | 2003 | Supporting | $40,000,000 | – | $1,941,030 |
| The Cat in the Hat (2003 film) soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.79): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $11.8M shrunk median for 2000s/tentpole (n=9) vs early terms | 2003 | Lead | $109,000,000 | $134,000,000 | $9,414,443 |
| Uptown Girls soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.79): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $19.4M shrunk median for 2000s/mid (n=2), capped at $4.5M vs early terms | 2003 | Lead | $30,000,000 | $44,600,000 | $3,662,306 |
| Hansel and Gretel soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.66): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $18.8M median for its era and nearest band (mid), capped at $1.5M vs early terms | 2002 | Lead | $10,000,000 | $154,642 | $1,150,155 |
| Sweet Home Alabama soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.66): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $19.4M shrunk median for 2000s/mid (n=2), capped at $4.5M vs early terms | 2002 | Lead | $30,000,000 | $180,600,000 | $3,137,725 |
| Taken soft-breakthrough supporting blend (w=0.66) | 2002 | Supporting | $40,000,000 | – | $1,700,580 |
| Trapped soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.66): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $19.4M shrunk median for 2000s/mid (n=2), capped at $4.5M vs early terms | 2002 | Lead | $30,000,000 | $13,400,000 | $3,137,725 |
| Family Guy soft-breakthrough supporting blend (w=0.50) | 2001 | Supporting | $40,000,000 | – | $1,404,688 |
| Father Xmas soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.50): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $19.4M shrunk median for 2000s/mid (n=2), capped at $6.0M vs early terms | 2001 | Lead | $40,000,000 | – | $3,242,188 |
| I Am Sam soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.50): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $19.4M shrunk median for 2000s/mid (n=2), capped at $3.3M vs early terms | 2001 | Lead | $22,000,000 | $97,800,000 | $1,892,188 |
| Malcolm in the Middle soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.50): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $19.4M shrunk median for 2000s/mid (n=2), capped at $6.0M vs early terms | 2001 | Lead | $40,000,000 | – | $3,242,188 |
| The Ellen Show soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.50): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $19.4M shrunk median for 2000s/mid (n=2), capped at $6.0M vs early terms | 2001 | Lead | $40,000,000 | – | $3,242,188 |
| The Fighting Fitzgeralds soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.50): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $19.4M shrunk median for 2000s/mid (n=2), capped at $6.0M vs early terms | 2001 | Lead | $40,000,000 | – | $3,242,188 |
| Tomcats soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.50): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $18.8M median for its era and nearest band (mid), capped at $1.6M vs early terms | 2001 | Lead | $11,000,000 | $23,400,000 | $1,059,375 |
| Ally McBeal soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.34): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $19.4M shrunk median for 2000s/mid (n=2), capped at $6.0M vs early terms | 2000 | Lead | $40,000,000 | – | $2,355,516 |
| CSI: Crime Scene Investigation soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.34): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $19.4M shrunk median for 2000s/mid (n=2), capped at $6.0M vs early terms | 2000 | Lead | $40,000,000 | – | $2,355,516 |
| ER soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.34): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $19.4M shrunk median for 2000s/mid (n=2), capped at $6.0M vs early terms | 2000 | Lead | $40,000,000 | – | $2,355,516 |
| Spin City soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.34): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $19.4M shrunk median for 2000s/mid (n=2), capped at $6.0M vs early terms | 2000 | Lead | $40,000,000 | – | $2,355,516 |
| Strong Medicine soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.34): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $19.4M shrunk median for 2000s/mid (n=2), capped at $6.0M vs early terms | 2000 | Lead | $40,000,000 | – | $2,355,516 |
| The Practice soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.34): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $19.4M shrunk median for 2000s/mid (n=2), capped at $6.0M vs early terms | 2000 | Lead | $40,000,000 | – | $2,355,516 |
Các số liệu được mô hình hóa hoạt động như thế nào. An undisclosed lead role after the breakthrough gets the median of disclosed lead salaries for its era and budget band, capped at 15% of the film’s budget. Supporting and pre-breakthrough roles get 2.5% of that median, the documented going rate for actors before stardom. Films with no reported budget are treated as small productions. Undocumented backend, endorsements, and producer or director credits enter as separate estimated lines in the calculation above, built from disclosed medians. Every median comes from the published tables on our trang phương pháp.
Tài sản ròng Over Time
Số dư theo mô hình vào cuối mỗi năm, phù hợp với bảng theo từng năm dưới đây.
Từng năm
| Year | Income | Phí đại diện | Thuế suất | Spent | Saved | Balance |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | $17,342,422 | $2,601,363 | 45% | $4,468,899 | $3,638,683 | $204,126,706 |
| 2025 | $31,210,950 | $4,681,643 | 45% | $8,042,625 | $6,548,494 | $196,508,722 |
| 2024 | $37,372,786 | $5,605,918 | 45% | $9,630,444 | $7,841,334 | $177,062,796 |
| 2023 | $19,194,734 | $2,879,210 | 45% | $4,946,214 | $4,027,324 | $156,691,835 |
| 2022 | $13,771,645 | $2,065,747 | 45% | $3,548,760 | $2,889,484 | $140,121,982 |
| 2021 | $5,136,638 | $770,496 | 45% | $1,323,640 | $1,077,738 | $147,266,501 |
| 2020 | $12,070,089 | $1,810,513 | 45% | $3,110,293 | $2,532,474 | $134,835,791 |
| 2019 | $22,011,489 | $3,301,723 | 45% | $5,672,053 | $4,618,319 | $123,152,588 |
| 2018 | $17,534,863 | $2,630,229 | 45% | $4,518,489 | $3,679,060 | $107,133,836 |
| 2017 | $9,188,423 | $1,378,263 | 47% | $2,281,629 | $1,857,756 | $102,854,109 |
| 2016 | $9,057,294 | $1,358,594 | 47% | $2,249,067 | $1,831,244 | $93,852,882 |
| 2015 | $8,708,057 | $1,306,209 | 47% | $2,162,346 | $1,760,633 | $87,475,202 |
| 2014 | $10,966,806 | $1,645,021 | 47% | $2,723,229 | $2,217,317 | $83,681,730 |
| 2013 | $6,104,124 | $915,619 | 47% | $1,515,749 | $1,234,159 | $76,776,444 |
| 2012 | $30,381,442 | $4,557,216 | 43% | $8,113,559 | $6,606,250 | $69,179,469 |
| 2011 | $15,206,484 | $2,280,973 | 43% | $4,060,989 | $3,306,553 | $58,656,160 |
| 2010 | $11,856,454 | $1,778,468 | 43% | $3,166,342 | $2,578,110 | $53,302,781 |
| 2009 | $25,259,900 | $3,788,985 | 43% | $6,745,818 | $5,492,604 | $47,481,395 |
| 2008 | $11,193,777 | $1,679,067 | 43% | $2,989,370 | $2,434,015 | $38,327,333 |
| 2007 | $7,549,428 | $1,132,414 | 43% | $2,016,123 | $1,641,575 | $39,456,214 |
| 2006 | $13,204,473 | $1,980,671 | 43% | $3,526,339 | $2,871,228 | $36,174,834 |
| 2005 | $20,870,439 | $3,130,566 | 43% | $5,573,584 | $4,538,143 | $31,227,266 |
| 2004 | $31,748,706 | $4,762,306 | 43% | $8,478,695 | $6,903,553 | $25,751,262 |
| 2003 | $24,470,478 | $3,670,572 | 43% | $6,534,998 | $5,320,949 | $17,876,607 |
| 2002 | $17,484,338 | $2,622,651 | 46% | $4,423,551 | $3,601,760 | $11,434,960 |
| 2001 | $19,637,546 | $2,945,632 | 46% | $4,968,315 | $4,045,319 | $8,076,547 |
| 2000 | $15,270,666 | $2,290,600 | 46% | $3,863,491 | $3,145,745 | $4,032,962 |
| 1999 | $4,239,928 | $635,989 | 46% | $1,072,705 | $873,422 | $873,422 |
Model Notes
- PROXY CƯ TRÚ: nơi cư trú không có nguồn riêng lẻ cho đợt này; Mặc định US-CA được áp dụng cho đến khi được ghi lại
- salary comps: 2 disclosed lead fee(s) flagged as non-market outliers (scale / far-below-quote) and excluded from era medians
- Tín dụng hình ảnh: Wikimedia Commons via Wikipedia (Dakota Fanning)
Phương pháp luận
We rebuild Dakota’s career as a yearly time series. Disclosed salaries and documented backend enter as reported, with citations. Undisclosed lead roles get the median of disclosed salaries for their era and budget band, capped at 15% of the film’s budget. Supporting roles and roles from before the breakthrough get 2.5% of that median, the going-rate ratio measured from disclosed pre-stardom deals. Films with no reported budget are treated as small productions, and every role is estimated unless a source documents it was unpaid. Representation fees come out at sourced rates, taxes follow the eras actually lived through, spending follows measured household savings behavior unless court documents say otherwise, and what remains compounds at real market returns. Undocumented backend enters as an expected value from disclosed deals, endorsements at the median disclosed ambassador fee, and producer or director credits at union-scale floors.
Mô hình đầy đủ, mọi bảng giá và cách kiểm tra ước tính của chúng tôi so với các giao dịch thực đều có sẵn trên trang phương pháp.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is Dakota Fanning's net worth in 2026?
As of 2026, Dakota Fanning's net worth is an estimated $204.1 Million. The estimate is built film by film from disclosed salaries and documented backend, then year by year: income, minus representation fees and taxes, minus spending, compounded at real market returns.
How does Dakota Fanning make money?
Lương quay phim và sự tham gia phụ trợ được ghi lại.
How is Dakota Fanning's net worth calculated?
Disclosed paydays enter as reported, with citations. Undisclosed lead roles use the median of disclosed salaries for their era and budget band, capped at 15% of the film's budget, and supporting or early-career roles use the documented pre-stardom fraction of that median. We subtract sourced representation fees, taxes for the years Dakota actually worked, and spending from measured savings behavior, then compound at real market returns. Undocumented backend, endorsements, and producing credits enter as estimated lines from disclosed medians. Every rate and source is published.
How much does Dakota Fanning make per film?
Nó thay đổi tùy theo vai trò và thời đại, đồng thời bảng theo từng phim ở trên liệt kê mức thù lao được tính cho mỗi tựa phim. Ngày trả lương được tiết lộ nhập như đã báo cáo. Các vai diễn không được tiết lộ được mô phỏng từ những gì các diễn viên có thể so sánh kiếm được trong cùng thời đại và phạm vi ngân sách, với các vai chính sau bước đột phá kiếm được nhiều tiền nhất và các vai phụ hoặc vai phụ chỉ là một phần nhỏ trong số đó.
Tại sao thuế suất cao như vậy và các tác nhân không né tránh việc này với một công ty cho vay?
Tax comes out at the effective rate for where Dakota lived each year, which is the rate shown in the year-by-year table. In a high-tax state like California, combined federal and state income tax reaches close to half of a top earner's income, so those years run in the mid-40s percent. A loan-out company, the corporation many actors run their income through, does not lower the tax on the money they take home. Its real advantage is deducting business costs such as agent, manager, and attorney fees, and the model already subtracts those as a separate line before any tax is applied. High-earning performers also fall outside the pass-through business deduction that other company owners can claim, so it buys them no rate cut.
Tại sao con số này khác với các trang web có giá trị ròng khác?
Most sites publish a single number with no way to check it. This estimate is built in the open: every salary, rate, and assumption is on the page, and the trang phương pháp lists every source.
Ước tính này chính xác đến mức nào?
Không có ước tính giá trị ròng nào cho một cá nhân là chính xác; đây là một mô hình được xây dựng từ dữ liệu công cộng. Sự khác biệt là bạn có thể xem nó được xây dựng như thế nào và kiểm tra từng bước. Mức độ tin cậy ở gần đầu phép tính cho biết con số dựa trên các con số được tiết lộ bao nhiêu và trang đánh dấu nơi con số dựa trên một giả định.
Is Dakota Fanning rich compared to the average person?
Yes. A net worth of $204.1 Million is far above the median American household, which sits near $193,000 according to Federal Reserve data.
What is Dakota Fanning's biggest source of wealth?
On this page it is film salaries, the largest line in the calculation at $349.0 Million. The full breakdown, with every other line and its source, is above.
How much does Dakota Fanning make from endorsements?
The model counts $16.0 Million in career endorsement income for Dakota: 1 named partnerships x the $4.0M annual fee from the median disclosed film deal x a 4-year term, spread across the deal years. It is an estimate, since the individual deal values are not all public, and it sits as its own line in the calculation above.
Khám phá các diễn viên khác
Giới thiệu về NetWorth Explained
We originally created NWE because nobody in the public-figure net worth space showed their work. Magazines and sites threw out big numbers while hiding behind vague claims of “proprietary algorithms” hoặc “insider knowledge.” That’s why we started the world’s only publication that transparently showed every assumption, every variable, and every calculation. We’re still the only ones who do it this way. Đọc thêm về NetWorth Explained.