$387.3 Million
George Clooney Tài sản ròng 2026
Cập nhật lần cuối August 3, 2026
As of 2026, George Clooney has an estimated net worth of $387.3 Million, computed film by film and year by year from public records and published rates. Every input, rate, and source behind the number is on this page.
Calculation
- Mức lương được tiết lộ và phần phụ trợ được ghi lại, mỗi phần đều có trích dẫn
- Các vai trò không được tiết lộ được mô phỏng từ những vai trò có thể so sánh được tiết lộ cho thời đại, mức ngân sách và giai đoạn sự nghiệp của họ
- Phần phụ trợ, chứng thực và tạo ra các khoản tín dụng ước tính từ mức trung bình được tiết lộ
Fast Facts
| Birthdate | May 6, 1961 |
|---|---|
| Birthplace | Lexington |
| Breakthrough | ER (1994) |
| Best Known | Ocean's Eleven (2001) |
Who Is George Clooney?
George Clooney was born May 6, 1961 in Lexington, best known for Ocean's Eleven (2001). The earnings behind George's net worth come from film salaries, backend participation, endorsement deals, and the Casamigos tequila sale proceeds.
The model tracks George's earning years from 1971 to 2026, with the biggest single year in 2020 at about $30.7 Million of gross income. After representation fees, taxes, and living costs, what stays invested compounds at market returns into an estimated $387.3 Million today.
Data
Mỗi dòng bên dưới được tính toán từ dữ liệu công khai và bảng giá được công bố trên trang của chúng tôi trang phương pháp. Sự tự tin: hạng C. Các số liệu được ghi lại chỉ bao gồm một phần nhỏ của con số này, vì vậy hầu hết nó được mô hình hóa từ các tỷ lệ đã công bố và các điểm so sánh (các điểm chạy từ A, hầu hết được ghi lại, đến C, chủ yếu được mô hình hóa).
The Calculation
| Line | Amount |
|---|---|
| Revenue | |
| Film pay with a disclosed figure (1 of 98 films) lương mỗi phim và phụ trợ từ báo cáo được trích dẫn | $10,000,000 |
| Film pay, modeled lead roles (53 of 98 films) era and budget-band medians of disclosed lead salaries (winsorized, thin cells shrunk toward the era median), blended with this actor's disclosed quote history when available; soft breakthrough blend near the career break year | $421,223,455 |
| Film pay, modeled post-breakthrough supporting roles (15 of 98 films) 12.0% of lead cells: lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio | $27,881,416 |
| Film pay, modeled supporting and early roles (29 of 98 films) 2,5% mức trung bình của thời đại: tỷ lệ trước khi trở thành ngôi sao | $9,338,770 |
| Điểm phụ trợ, ước tính 12% of disclosed lead deals included points, at a median 2.6% of box office; expected value on 47 commercially viable undisclosed lead roles; cash spread over 3 years; 14 film(s) used band-specific box-office/budget multiples as a gross proxy | $19,224,225 |
| Chứng thực, ước tính (2 quan hệ đối tác thương hiệu) 2 named partnerships x the $4.0M annual fee from the median disclosed film deal x a 4-year term, spread across the deal years | $32,000,000 |
| Số dư, ước tính SAG residual rates on post-theatrical receipts assumed at half of box office, split by role share and spread over the ten years after each release; 52 film(s) used band-specific box-office proxies | $46,679,584 |
| ER salary network drama star pay mid-1990s; entered rising to roughly $100K/ep late ER seasons he headlined | $11,500,000 |
| Lợi tức đầu tư từ tiền tiết kiệm mixed portfolio: 55% actual 60/40 securities returns (taxed) + 45% US long-run home-price rate on the rest | $184,888,752 |
| Casamigos tequila sale proceeds (net retained) equity, estimated Diageo bought Casamigos for up to $1B; Clooney was a co-founder, one-third of the founder share modeled at $250M enterprise credit after co-founder split conservatism; $250,000,000 x 33% stake (forbes.com) | $82,500,000 |
| Expenses | |
| Phí đại diện đại lý 10% + luật sư 5% | -$85,778,211 |
| Taxes Tỷ lệ hiệu quả của US-CA, theo từng năm | -$218,327,555 |
| Chi tiêu cá nhân measured household savings rates by income, times a 88% entertainment-household factor | -$147,836,935 |
| Giá trị ròng ước tính | $387,300,791 |
Phim theo phim
| Film | Year | Role | Budget | Phòng vé | Tính lương |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Good Night, and Good Luck no disclosed fee: modeled on the $25.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid), capped at $1.1M | 2025 | Lead | $7,000,000 | $54,641,191 | $1,050,000 |
| Jay Kelly no disclosed fee: modeled on the $23.8M shrunk median for 2020s/large (n=2), capped at $10.5M | 2025 | Lead | $70,000,000 | – | $10,500,000 |
| Nespresso: The Detective no disclosed fee: modeled on the $23.8M shrunk median for 2020s/large (n=2), capped at $10.5M | 2025 | Lead | $70,000,000 | – | $10,500,000 |
| IF no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $16.4M shrunk median for 2020s/tentpole (n=5) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio) | 2024 | Supporting | $110,000,000 | $190,300,000 | $1,971,429 |
| Wolfs no disclosed fee: modeled on the $23.8M shrunk median for 2020s/large (n=2), capped at $10.5M | 2024 | Lead | $70,000,000 | – | $10,500,000 |
| The Boys in the Boat no disclosed fee: modeled on the $21.7M shrunk median for 2020s/mid (n=1), capped at $6.0M | 2023 | Lead | $40,000,000 | $55,500,000 | $6,000,000 |
| The Flash no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $18.0M shrunk median for 2020s/blockbuster (n=8) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio) | 2023 | Supporting | $220,000,000 | $270,633,313 | $2,160,000 |
| Norman Lear: 100 Years of Music & Laughter no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $23.8M shrunk median for 2020s/large (n=2) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio) | 2022 | Supporting | $70,000,000 | – | $2,850,000 |
| The Last Movie Stars no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $23.8M shrunk median for 2020s/large (n=2) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio) | 2022 | Supporting | $70,000,000 | – | $2,850,000 |
| Ticket to Paradise no disclosed fee: modeled on the $23.8M shrunk median for 2020s/large (n=2), capped at $9.0M | 2022 | Lead | $60,000,000 | $168,505,500 | $9,000,000 |
| Tuần trước Tối nay với John Oliver no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $23.8M shrunk median for 2020s/large (n=2) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio) | 2021 | Supporting | $70,000,000 | – | $2,850,000 |
| The Tender Bar no disclosed fee: modeled on the $23.8M shrunk median for 2020s/large (n=2), capped at $10.5M | 2021 | Lead | $70,000,000 | – | $10,499,999 |
| The Art of Political Murder no disclosed fee: modeled on the $23.8M shrunk median for 2020s/large (n=2), capped at $10.5M | 2020 | Lead | $70,000,000 | – | $10,499,999 |
| The Midnight Sky no disclosed fee: modeled on the $16.4M shrunk median for 2020s/tentpole (n=5), capped at $15.0M | 2020 | Lead | $100,000,000 | $3,000,000 | $14,999,998 |
| Trial by Media no disclosed fee: modeled on the $23.8M shrunk median for 2020s/large (n=2), capped at $10.5M | 2020 | Lead | $70,000,000 | – | $10,499,999 |
| Catch-22 no disclosed fee: modeled on the $5.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid), capped at $2.7M | 2019 | Lead | $18,000,000 | $24,900,000 | $2,699,999 |
| On Becoming a God in Central Florida no disclosed fee: modeled on the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3), capped at $6.0M | 2019 | Lead | $40,000,000 | – | $5,999,999 |
| My Next Guest Needs No Introduction with David Letterman no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio) | 2018 | Supporting | $40,000,000 | – | $1,320,000 |
| Suburbicon no disclosed fee: modeled on the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3), capped at $3.8M | 2017 | Lead | $25,000,000 | $12,800,000 | $3,749,997 |
| Hail, Caesar! no disclosed fee: modeled on the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3), capped at $3.3M | 2016 | Lead | $22,000,000 | $63,647,656 | $3,299,995 |
| Money Monster no disclosed fee: modeled on the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3), capped at $4.0M | 2016 | Lead | $27,000,000 | $93,282,604 | $4,049,994 |
| A Very Murray Christmas no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio) | 2015 | Supporting | $40,000,000 | – | $1,319,997 |
| Tomorrowland no disclosed fee: modeled on the $20.0M shrunk median for 2010s/tentpole (n=12) | 2015 | Lead | $190,000,000 | $209,154,322 | $19,999,938 |
| Text Santa 4 no disclosed fee: modeled on the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3), capped at $6.0M | 2014 | Lead | $40,000,000 | – | $5,999,965 |
| The Monuments Men no disclosed fee: modeled on the $20.0M shrunk median for 2010s/large (n=8), capped at $10.5M | 2014 | Lead | $70,000,000 | $154,984,035 | $10,499,939 |
| Gravity no disclosed fee: modeled on the $20.0M shrunk median for 2010s/tentpole (n=12), capped at $15.8M | 2013 | Lead | $105,000,000 | $723,000,000 | $15,749,818 |
| The Descendants no disclosed fee: modeled on the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3), capped at $3.0M | 2011 | Lead | $20,000,000 | $177,200,000 | $2,999,876 |
| The Ides of March no disclosed fee: modeled on the $5.0M median for its era and nearest band (mid), capped at $1.9M | 2011 | Lead | $12,500,000 | $76,300,000 | $1,874,921 |
| Hope for Haiti Now no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio) | 2010 | Supporting | $40,000,000 | – | $1,319,908 |
| Memphis Beat no disclosed fee: modeled on the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3), capped at $6.0M | 2010 | Lead | $40,000,000 | – | $5,999,494 |
| The American no disclosed fee: modeled on the $11.0M shrunk median for 2010s/mid (n=3), capped at $3.0M | 2010 | Lead | $20,000,000 | $67,900,000 | $2,999,759 |
| Fantastic Mr. Fox no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $19.4M shrunk median for 2000s/mid (n=2) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio) | 2009 | Supporting | $40,000,000 | $58,100,000 | $2,324,683 |
| The Men Who Stare at Goats no disclosed fee: modeled on the $19.4M shrunk median for 2000s/mid (n=2); personal blend cut to 42% on a smaller-than-usual budget; blended 42% with this actor's disclosed quote history ($10.0M personal, n=1); cap raised to similar-budget personal max within 50% of budget ($10.0M), capped at $10.0M | 2009 | Lead | $24,000,000 | $69,100,000 | $9,998,361 |
| Up in the Air no disclosed fee: modeled on the $19.4M shrunk median for 2000s/mid (n=2); personal blend cut to 44% on a smaller-than-usual budget; blended 44% with this actor's disclosed quote history ($10.0M personal, n=1); cap raised to similar-budget personal max within 50% of budget ($10.0M), capped at $10.0M | 2009 | Lead | $25,000,000 | $166,842,739 | $9,998,361 |
| Burn After Reading no disclosed fee: modeled on the $19.4M shrunk median for 2000s/mid (n=2); personal blend cut to 65% on a smaller-than-usual budget; blended 65% with this actor's disclosed quote history ($10.0M personal, n=1); cap raised to similar-budget personal max within 50% of budget ($10.0M), capped at $10.0M | 2008 | Lead | $37,000,000 | $163,800,000 | $9,996,809 |
| Leatherheads no disclosed fee: modeled on the $20.0M shrunk median for 2000s/large (n=18); blended 75% with this actor's disclosed quote history ($10.0M personal, n=1); cap raised to similar-budget personal max within 50% of budget ($10.0M), capped at $10.0M | 2008 | Lead | $58,000,000 | $41,300,000 | $9,996,814 |
| Darfur Now no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $19.4M shrunk median for 2000s/mid (n=2) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio) | 2007 | Supporting | $40,000,000 | – | $2,323,798 |
| Michael Clayton no disclosed fee: modeled on the $19.4M shrunk median for 2000s/mid (n=2); personal blend cut to 38% on a smaller-than-usual budget; blended 38% with this actor's disclosed quote history ($10.0M personal, n=1); cap raised to similar-budget personal max within 50% of budget ($10.0M), capped at $10.0M | 2007 | Lead | $21,500,000 | $93,000,000 | $9,993,787 |
| Ocean's Thirteen no disclosed fee: modeled on the $20.0M shrunk median for 2000s/large (n=18); blended 75% with this actor's disclosed quote history ($10.0M personal, n=1) | 2007 | Lead | $85,000,000 | $311,312,624 | $12,492,164 |
| Sand and Sorrow no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $19.4M shrunk median for 2000s/mid (n=2) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio) | 2007 | Supporting | $40,000,000 | – | $2,323,798 |
| The Good German no disclosed fee: modeled on the $19.4M shrunk median for 2000s/mid (n=2); personal blend cut to 56% on a smaller-than-usual budget; blended 56% with this actor's disclosed quote history ($10.0M personal, n=1); cap raised to similar-budget personal max within 50% of budget ($10.0M), capped at $10.0M | 2006 | Lead | $32,000,000 | $6,000,000 | $9,987,905 |
| Good Night, and Good Luck no disclosed fee: modeled on the $18.8M median for its era and nearest band (mid); personal blend cut to 12% on a smaller-than-usual budget; blended 12% with this actor's disclosed quote history ($10.0M personal, n=1); cap raised to similar-budget personal max within 50% of budget ($3.5M), capped at $3.5M | 2005 | Lead | $7,000,000 | $54,641,191 | $3,492,505 |
| Syriana no disclosed fee: modeled on the $20.0M shrunk median for 2000s/large (n=18); blended 75% with this actor's disclosed quote history ($10.0M personal, n=1); cap raised to similar-budget personal max within 50% of budget ($10.0M), capped at $10.0M | 2005 | Lead | $50,000,000 | $94,000,000 | $9,976,510 |
| Unscripted no disclosed fee: modeled on the $19.4M shrunk median for 2000s/mid (n=2); personal blend cut to 71% on a smaller-than-usual budget; blended 71% with this actor's disclosed quote history ($10.0M personal, n=1); cap raised to similar-budget personal max within 50% of budget ($10.0M), capped at $10.0M | 2005 | Lead | $40,000,000 | – | $9,976,471 |
| Ocean's Twelve no disclosed fee: modeled on the $11.8M shrunk median for 2000s/tentpole (n=9); blended 75% with this actor's disclosed quote history ($10.0M personal, n=1) | 2004 | Lead | $110,000,000 | $362,989,076 | $10,405,734 |
| Intolerable Cruelty no disclosed fee: modeled on the $20.0M shrunk median for 2000s/large (n=18); blended 75% with this actor's disclosed quote history ($10.0M personal, n=1); cap raised to similar-budget personal max within 50% of budget ($10.0M), capped at $10.0M | 2003 | Lead | $60,000,000 | $120,800,000 | $9,911,498 |
| K Street no disclosed fee: modeled on the $19.4M shrunk median for 2000s/mid (n=2); personal blend cut to 71% on a smaller-than-usual budget; blended 71% with this actor's disclosed quote history ($10.0M personal, n=1); cap raised to similar-budget personal max within 50% of budget ($10.0M), capped at $10.0M | 2003 | Lead | $40,000,000 | – | $9,911,353 |
| Spy Kids 3-D: Game Over no disclosed fee: modeled on the $19.4M shrunk median for 2000s/mid (n=2); personal blend cut to 67% on a smaller-than-usual budget; blended 67% with this actor's disclosed quote history ($10.0M personal, n=1); cap raised to similar-budget personal max within 50% of budget ($10.0M), capped at $10.0M | 2003 | Lead | $38,000,000 | $197,011,982 | $9,911,353 |
| Confessions of a Dangerous Mind no disclosed fee: modeled on the $19.4M shrunk median for 2000s/mid (n=2); personal blend cut to 53% on a smaller-than-usual budget; blended 53% with this actor's disclosed quote history ($10.0M personal, n=1); cap raised to similar-budget personal max within 50% of budget ($10.0M), capped at $10.0M | 2002 | Lead | $30,000,000 | $33,000,000 | $9,828,850 |
| Solaris no disclosed fee: modeled on the $19.4M shrunk median for 2000s/mid (n=2); blended 75% with this actor's disclosed quote history ($10.0M personal, n=1); cap raised to similar-budget personal max within 50% of budget ($10.0M), capped at $10.0M | 2002 | Lead | $47,000,000 | $30,000,000 | $9,828,850 |
| Welcome to Collinwood no disclosed fee: modeled on the $18.8M median for its era and nearest band (mid); personal blend cut to 18% on a smaller-than-usual budget; blended 18% with this actor's disclosed quote history ($10.0M personal, n=1); cap raised to similar-budget personal max within 50% of budget ($5.0M), capped at $5.0M | 2002 | Lead | $10,000,000 | $4,600,000 | $4,918,500 |
| Ocean's Eleven disclosed: reported $10M for Ocean's Eleven | 2001 | Lead | $85,000,000 | $450,717,150 | $10,000,000 |
| Spy Kids no disclosed fee: modeled on the $19.4M shrunk median for 2000s/mid (n=2); personal blend cut to 62% on a smaller-than-usual budget; blended 62% with this actor's disclosed quote history ($10.0M personal, n=1); cap raised to similar-budget personal max within 50% of budget ($10.0M), capped at $10.0M | 2001 | Lead | $35,000,000 | $147,900,000 | $9,672,232 |
| Fail Safe no disclosed fee: modeled on the $19.4M shrunk median for 2000s/mid (n=2); personal blend cut to 71% on a smaller-than-usual budget; blended 71% with this actor's disclosed quote history ($10.0M personal, n=1); cap raised to similar-budget personal max within 50% of budget ($10.0M), capped at $10.0M | 2000 | Lead | $40,000,000 | – | $9,381,778 |
| O Brother, Where Art Thou? no disclosed fee: modeled on the $19.4M shrunk median for 2000s/mid (n=2); personal blend cut to 46% on a smaller-than-usual budget; blended 46% with this actor's disclosed quote history ($10.0M personal, n=1); cap raised to similar-budget personal max within 50% of budget ($10.0M), capped at $10.0M | 2000 | Lead | $26,000,000 | $71,900,000 | $9,381,778 |
| The Perfect Storm no disclosed fee: modeled on the $11.8M shrunk median for 2000s/tentpole (n=9); blended 75% with this actor's disclosed quote history ($10.0M personal, n=1) | 2000 | Lead | $130,000,000 | $328,700,000 | $9,794,518 |
| Kilroy no disclosed fee: modeled on the $14.4M shrunk median for 1990s/mid (n=6), capped at $3.9M | 1999 | Lead | $26,000,000 | – | $3,477,947 |
| South Park: Bigger, Longer & Uncut no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $14.4M shrunk median for 1990s/mid (n=6) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio) | 1999 | Supporting | $21,000,000 | $83,100,000 | $1,562,214 |
| The Book That Wrote Itself no disclosed fee: post-breakthrough supporting at 12.0% of the $2.0M median for its era and nearest band (small) (lane_benchmarks role/post_breakthrough_supporting_ratio), capped at 15% of budget | 1999 | Supporting | $25,000 | – | $3,750 |
| Three Kings no disclosed fee: modeled on the $14.4M shrunk median for 1990s/mid (n=6), capped at $7.2M | 1999 | Lead | $48,000,000 | $107,700,000 | $6,384,578 |
| Murphy Brown soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.79): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $14.4M shrunk median for 1990s/mid (n=6), capped at $3.9M vs early terms | 1998 | Lead | $26,000,000 | – | $3,161,395 |
| Out of Sight soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.79): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $14.4M shrunk median for 1990s/mid (n=6), capped at $7.2M vs early terms | 1998 | Lead | $48,000,000 | $77,745,568 | $5,772,987 |
| The Thin Red Line soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.79): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $14.6M shrunk median for 1990s/large (n=3), capped at $7.8M vs early terms | 1998 | Lead | $52,000,000 | $98,100,000 | $6,248,996 |
| Waiting for Woody soft-breakthrough supporting blend (w=0.79) | 1998 | Supporting | $26,000,000 | – | $1,440,119 |
| Batman & Robin soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.66): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $12.8M shrunk median for 1990s/tentpole (n=1) vs early terms | 1997 | Lead | $125,000,000 | $238,000,000 | $8,588,547 |
| South Park soft-breakthrough supporting blend (w=0.66) | 1997 | Supporting | $26,000,000 | – | $1,261,720 |
| The Peacemaker soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.66): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $14.6M shrunk median for 1990s/large (n=3), capped at $7.5M vs early terms | 1997 | Lead | $50,000,000 | $110,400,000 | $5,079,497 |
| From Dusk till Dawn soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.50): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $10.0M shrunk median for 1990s/small (n=1), capped at $2.9M vs early terms | 1996 | Lead | $19,000,000 | $59,300,000 | $1,550,000 |
| One Fine Day soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.50): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $14.4M shrunk median for 1990s/mid (n=6), capped at $3.9M vs early terms | 1996 | Lead | $26,000,000 | $97,500,000 | $2,129,688 |
| Friends soft-breakthrough blend (w=0.34): no disclosed fee: modeled on the $14.4M shrunk median for 1990s/mid (n=6), capped at $3.9M vs early terms | 1995 | Lead | $26,000,000 | – | $1,560,509 |
| ER no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $14.4M shrunk median for 1990s/mid (n=6) (pre-stardom rate); soft-breakthrough weight 0.12 | 1993 | Lead | $26,000,000 | – | $781,428 |
| Sisters no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $14.4M shrunk median for 1990s/mid (n=6) (pre-stardom rate); soft-breakthrough weight 0.12 | 1993 | Lead | $26,000,000 | – | $781,428 |
| The Building no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $14.4M shrunk median for 1990s/mid (n=6) (pre-stardom rate); soft-breakthrough weight 0.12 | 1993 | Lead | $26,000,000 | – | $781,428 |
| The Harvest no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $14.4M shrunk median for 1990s/mid (n=6) (pre-stardom rate) | 1993 | Supporting | $26,000,000 | – | $522,161 |
| Without Warning: Terror in the Towers no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $14.4M shrunk median for 1990s/mid (n=6) (pre-stardom rate); soft-breakthrough weight 0.12 | 1993 | Lead | $26,000,000 | – | $781,428 |
| Bodies of Evidence no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $14.4M shrunk median for 1990s/mid (n=6) (pre-stardom rate); soft-breakthrough weight 0.06 | 1992 | Lead | $26,000,000 | – | $589,406 |
| Jack's Place no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $14.4M shrunk median for 1990s/mid (n=6) (pre-stardom rate); soft-breakthrough weight 0.06 | 1992 | Lead | $26,000,000 | – | $589,406 |
| Unbecoming Age no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $14.4M shrunk median for 1990s/mid (n=6) (pre-stardom rate); soft-breakthrough weight 0.06 | 1992 | Lead | $26,000,000 | – | $589,406 |
| Baby Talk no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $14.4M shrunk median for 1990s/mid (n=6) (pre-stardom rate); soft-breakthrough weight 0.03 | 1991 | Lead | $26,000,000 | – | $481,333 |
| Red Surf no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $4.1M shrunk median for pre1990/small (n=2) (pre-stardom rate); soft-breakthrough weight 0.01 | 1989 | Lead | $14,000,000 | – | $121,728 |
| Return of the Killer Tomatoes no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $2.8M median for its era and nearest band (small) (pre-stardom rate); soft-breakthrough weight 0.00 | 1988 | Lead | $1,000,000 | $5,000,000 | $69,140 |
| Hunter no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $4.1M shrunk median for pre1990/small (n=2) (pre-stardom rate); soft-breakthrough weight 0.00 | 1987 | Lead | $14,000,000 | – | $108,063 |
| Murder, She Wrote no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $4.1M shrunk median for pre1990/small (n=2) (pre-stardom rate); soft-breakthrough weight 0.00 | 1987 | Lead | $14,000,000 | – | $108,063 |
| Return to Horror High no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $2.8M median for its era and nearest band (small) (pre-stardom rate); soft-breakthrough weight 0.00 | 1987 | Lead | $1,000,000 | $1,200,000 | $68,951 |
| Roseanne no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $4.1M shrunk median for pre1990/small (n=2) (pre-stardom rate); soft-breakthrough weight 0.00 | 1987 | Lead | $14,000,000 | – | $108,063 |
| Sunset Beat no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $4.1M shrunk median for pre1990/small (n=2) (pre-stardom rate); soft-breakthrough weight 0.00 | 1987 | Lead | $14,000,000 | – | $108,063 |
| The Golden Girls no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $4.1M shrunk median for pre1990/small (n=2) (pre-stardom rate); soft-breakthrough weight 0.00 | 1987 | Lead | $14,000,000 | – | $108,063 |
| Combat Academy no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $4.1M shrunk median for pre1990/small (n=2) (pre-stardom rate); soft-breakthrough weight 0.00 | 1986 | Lead | $14,000,000 | – | $105,663 |
| Hotel no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $4.1M shrunk median for pre1990/small (n=2) (pre-stardom rate); soft-breakthrough weight 0.00 | 1986 | Lead | $14,000,000 | – | $105,663 |
| Throb no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $4.1M shrunk median for pre1990/small (n=2) (pre-stardom rate); soft-breakthrough weight 0.00 | 1986 | Lead | $14,000,000 | – | $105,663 |
| Vicious no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $4.1M shrunk median for pre1990/small (n=2) (pre-stardom rate); soft-breakthrough weight 0.00 | 1986 | Lead | $14,000,000 | – | $105,663 |
| Crazy Like a Fox no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $4.1M shrunk median for pre1990/small (n=2) (pre-stardom rate); soft-breakthrough weight 0.00 | 1985 | Lead | $14,000,000 | – | $104,429 |
| Street Hawk no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $4.1M shrunk median for pre1990/small (n=2) (pre-stardom rate); soft-breakthrough weight 0.00 | 1985 | Lead | $14,000,000 | – | $104,429 |
| The Facts of Life no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $4.1M shrunk median for pre1990/small (n=2) (pre-stardom rate); soft-breakthrough weight 0.00 | 1985 | Lead | $14,000,000 | – | $104,429 |
| Riptide no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $4.1M shrunk median for pre1990/small (n=2) (pre-stardom rate); soft-breakthrough weight 0.00 | 1984 | Lead | $14,000,000 | – | $103,795 |
| Grizzly II: Revenge no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $4.1M shrunk median for pre1990/small (n=2) (pre-stardom rate); soft-breakthrough weight 0.00 | 1983 | Lead | $14,000,000 | – | $103,469 |
| E/R no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $2.8M median for its era and nearest band (small) (pre-stardom rate); soft-breakthrough weight 0.00 | 1971 | Lead | $3,025,000 | – | $68,750 |
| The Uncle Al Show no disclosed fee: 2.5% of the $2.8M median for its era and nearest band (small) (pre-stardom rate); soft-breakthrough weight 0.00 | 1971 | Lead | $3,025,000 | – | $68,750 |
Các số liệu được mô hình hóa hoạt động như thế nào. An undisclosed lead role after the breakthrough gets the median of disclosed lead salaries for its era and budget band, capped at 15% of the film’s budget. Supporting and pre-breakthrough roles get 2.5% of that median, the documented going rate for actors before stardom. Films with no reported budget are treated as small productions. Undocumented backend, endorsements, and producer or director credits enter as separate estimated lines in the calculation above, built from disclosed medians. Every median comes from the published tables on our trang phương pháp.
Tài sản ròng Over Time
Số dư theo mô hình vào cuối mỗi năm, phù hợp với bảng theo từng năm dưới đây.
Từng năm
| Year | Income | Phí đại diện | Thuế suất | Spent | Saved | Balance |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | $1,507,662 | $226,149 | 45% | $475,339 | $229,493 | $387,300,791 |
| 2025 | $16,924,290 | $2,538,643 | 45% | $4,361,153 | $3,550,953 | $298,526,144 |
| 2024 | $16,664,236 | $2,499,635 | 45% | $4,294,140 | $3,496,390 | $274,947,724 |
| 2023 | $11,130,188 | $1,669,528 | 45% | $2,868,094 | $2,335,269 | $251,352,322 |
| 2022 | $14,519,157 | $2,177,873 | 45% | $3,741,383 | $3,046,322 | $228,558,444 |
| 2021 | $15,501,580 | $2,325,237 | 45% | $3,994,540 | $3,252,449 | $242,000,849 |
| 2020 | $30,712,801 | $4,606,920 | 45% | $7,914,259 | $6,443,976 | $220,207,278 |
| 2019 | $18,185,982 | $2,727,897 | 45% | $4,686,273 | $3,815,674 | $198,978,411 |
| 2018 | $5,005,206 | $750,781 | 45% | $1,289,772 | $1,050,162 | $176,392,303 |
| 2017 | $4,958,437 | $743,766 | 47% | $1,231,257 | $1,002,519 | $174,324,088 |
| 2016 | $8,347,366 | $1,252,105 | 47% | $2,072,781 | $1,687,707 | $161,062,536 |
| 2015 | $19,779,789 | $2,966,968 | 47% | $4,911,630 | $3,999,165 | $151,500,730 |
| 2014 | $20,465,249 | $3,069,787 | 47% | $5,081,841 | $4,137,754 | $144,003,363 |
| 2013 | $18,324,244 | $2,748,637 | 47% | $4,550,196 | $3,704,876 | $131,816,871 |
| 2012 | $6,516,986 | $977,548 | 43% | $1,740,403 | $1,417,077 | $117,321,309 |
| 2011 | $5,650,297 | $847,545 | 43% | $1,508,948 | $1,228,621 | $108,648,673 |
| 2010 | $11,019,768 | $1,652,965 | 43% | $2,942,899 | $2,396,178 | $103,447,662 |
| 2009 | $21,281,189 | $3,192,178 | 43% | $5,683,278 | $4,627,458 | $94,590,371 |
| 2008 | $23,027,659 | $3,454,149 | 43% | $6,149,684 | $5,007,217 | $82,118,071 |
| 2007 | $27,336,345 | $4,100,452 | 43% | $7,300,346 | $5,944,113 | $84,765,146 |
| 2006 | $17,523,757 | $2,628,564 | 43% | $4,679,831 | $3,810,429 | $75,403,014 |
| 2005 | $22,093,387 | $3,314,008 | 43% | $5,900,180 | $4,804,066 | $67,129,088 |
| 2004 | $16,597,800 | $2,489,670 | 43% | $4,432,549 | $3,609,085 | $60,134,909 |
| 2003 | $25,880,370 | $3,882,056 | 43% | $6,911,518 | $5,627,521 | $53,613,410 |
| 2002 | $28,193,623 | $4,229,043 | 46% | $7,133,009 | $5,807,864 | $43,702,746 |
| 2001 | $26,007,492 | $3,901,124 | 46% | $6,579,916 | $5,357,523 | $39,072,126 |
| 2000 | $24,551,834 | $3,682,775 | 46% | $6,211,634 | $5,057,658 | $33,729,107 |
| 1999 | $28,008,838 | $4,201,326 | 46% | $7,086,258 | $5,769,798 | $28,225,625 |
| 1998 | $26,875,220 | $4,031,283 | 46% | $6,799,452 | $5,536,274 | $20,967,403 |
| 1997 | $26,857,067 | $4,028,560 | 46% | $6,794,860 | $5,532,534 | $13,960,938 |
| 1996 | $17,763,156 | $2,664,473 | 46% | $4,494,093 | $3,659,196 | $7,533,735 |
| 1995 | $4,046,224 | $606,934 | 46% | $1,023,698 | $833,519 | $3,591,242 |
| 1994 | $1,627,644 | $244,147 | 46% | $411,795 | $335,293 | $2,428,601 |
| 1993 | $2,808,069 | $421,210 | 46% | $710,444 | $578,460 | $2,055,972 |
| 1992 | $2,505,731 | $375,860 | 36% | $751,350 | $611,767 | $1,395,778 |
| 1991 | $1,014,033 | $152,105 | 36% | $304,061 | $247,573 | $747,218 |
| 1990 | $291,035 | $43,655 | 36% | $106,773 | $51,550 | $448,004 |
| 1989 | $222,314 | $33,347 | 36% | $81,561 | $39,378 | $386,079 |
| 1988 | $219,051 | $32,858 | 36% | $80,364 | $38,800 | $310,708 |
| 1987 | $532,998 | $79,950 | 45% | $168,045 | $81,132 | $253,939 |
| 1986 | $653,082 | $97,962 | 55% | $168,468 | $81,336 | $166,703 |
| 1985 | $332,347 | $49,852 | 55% | $85,732 | $41,391 | $78,542 |
| 1984 | $113,325 | $16,999 | 55% | $39,151 | $4,196 | $32,947 |
| 1983 | $103,469 | $15,520 | 55% | $35,746 | $3,831 | $27,174 |
| 1982 | $0 | $0 | 55% | $0 | $0 | $22,880 |
| 1981 | $3,694 | $554 | 55% | $1,276 | $137 | $22,425 |
| 1980 | $3,694 | $554 | 55% | $1,276 | $137 | $21,846 |
| 1979 | $3,694 | $554 | 55% | $1,276 | $137 | $21,279 |
| 1978 | $3,694 | $554 | 55% | $1,276 | $137 | $20,722 |
| 1977 | $3,694 | $554 | 55% | $1,276 | $137 | $20,177 |
| 1976 | $3,694 | $554 | 55% | $1,276 | $137 | $19,642 |
| 1975 | $3,694 | $554 | 55% | $1,276 | $137 | $19,118 |
| 1974 | $3,694 | $554 | 55% | $1,276 | $137 | $18,605 |
| 1973 | $3,694 | $554 | 55% | $1,276 | $137 | $18,101 |
| 1972 | $3,694 | $554 | 55% | $1,276 | $137 | $17,608 |
| 1971 | $137,500 | $20,625 | 55% | $35,469 | $17,125 | $17,125 |
Model Notes
- PROXY CƯ TRÚ: nơi cư trú không có nguồn riêng lẻ cho đợt này; Mặc định US-CA được áp dụng cho đến khi được ghi lại
- salary comps: 2 disclosed lead fee(s) flagged as non-market outliers (scale / far-below-quote) and excluded from era medians
- Tín dụng hình ảnh: Wikimedia Commons via Wikipedia (George Clooney)
Tái tạo số này. Ước tính giá trị ròng phải được tái tạo theo cách của một phát hiện khoa học: cùng một đầu vào công khai và cùng một tỷ lệ được công bố sẽ luôn đưa ra cùng một câu trả lời. Ngân sách phim và doanh thu phòng vé là báo cáo công khai. Mọi mức lương, mức phí, thuế suất, tỷ lệ tiết kiệm và lợi nhuận chuẩn được tiết lộ đều được công bố kèm theo trích dẫn trên trang web của chúng tôi. trang phương pháp. Undisclosed lead roles use the median of disclosed salaries for their era and budget band, capped at 15% of the film’s budget. Supporting and early-career roles use the documented pre-stardom fraction of that median. Undocumented backend, endorsements, and hyphenate credits enter as estimated lines from disclosed medians. Apply the rates year by year as shown above and you will land on $387.3 Million.
Phương pháp luận
We rebuild George’s career as a yearly time series. Disclosed salaries and documented backend enter as reported, with citations. Undisclosed lead roles get the median of disclosed salaries for their era and budget band, capped at 15% of the film’s budget. Supporting roles and roles from before the breakthrough get 2.5% of that median, the going-rate ratio measured from disclosed pre-stardom deals. Films with no reported budget are treated as small productions, and every role is estimated unless a source documents it was unpaid. Representation fees come out at sourced rates, taxes follow the eras actually lived through, spending follows measured household savings behavior unless court documents say otherwise, and what remains compounds at real market returns. Undocumented backend enters as an expected value from disclosed deals, endorsements at the median disclosed ambassador fee, and producer or director credits at union-scale floors.
Mô hình đầy đủ, mọi bảng giá và cách kiểm tra ước tính của chúng tôi so với các giao dịch thực đều có sẵn trên trang phương pháp.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is George Clooney's net worth in 2026?
As of 2026, George Clooney's net worth is an estimated $387.3 Million. The estimate is built film by film from disclosed salaries and documented backend, then year by year: income, minus representation fees and taxes, minus spending, compounded at real market returns.
How does George Clooney make money?
Lương quay phim và sự tham gia phụ trợ được ghi lại.
How is George Clooney's net worth calculated?
Disclosed paydays enter as reported, with citations. Undisclosed lead roles use the median of disclosed salaries for their era and budget band, capped at 15% of the film's budget, and supporting or early-career roles use the documented pre-stardom fraction of that median. We subtract sourced representation fees, taxes for the years George actually worked, and spending from measured savings behavior, then compound at real market returns. Undocumented backend, endorsements, and producing credits enter as estimated lines from disclosed medians. Every rate and source is published.
How much does George Clooney make per film?
Nó thay đổi tùy theo vai trò và thời đại, đồng thời bảng theo từng phim ở trên liệt kê mức thù lao được tính cho mỗi tựa phim. Ngày trả lương được tiết lộ nhập như đã báo cáo. Các vai diễn không được tiết lộ được mô phỏng từ những gì các diễn viên có thể so sánh kiếm được trong cùng thời đại và phạm vi ngân sách, với các vai chính sau bước đột phá kiếm được nhiều tiền nhất và các vai phụ hoặc vai phụ chỉ là một phần nhỏ trong số đó.
Tại sao thuế suất cao như vậy và các tác nhân không né tránh việc này với một công ty cho vay?
Tax comes out at the effective rate for where George lived each year, which is the rate shown in the year-by-year table. In a high-tax state like California, combined federal and state income tax reaches close to half of a top earner's income, so those years run in the mid-40s percent. A loan-out company, the corporation many actors run their income through, does not lower the tax on the money they take home. Its real advantage is deducting business costs such as agent, manager, and attorney fees, and the model already subtracts those as a separate line before any tax is applied. High-earning performers also fall outside the pass-through business deduction that other company owners can claim, so it buys them no rate cut.
Tại sao con số này khác với các trang web có giá trị ròng khác?
Most sites publish a single number with no way to check it. This estimate is built in the open: every salary, rate, and assumption is on the page, and the trang phương pháp lists every source.
Ước tính này chính xác đến mức nào?
Không có ước tính giá trị ròng nào cho một cá nhân là chính xác; đây là một mô hình được xây dựng từ dữ liệu công cộng. Sự khác biệt là bạn có thể xem nó được xây dựng như thế nào và kiểm tra từng bước. Mức độ tin cậy ở gần đầu phép tính cho biết con số dựa trên các con số được tiết lộ bao nhiêu và trang đánh dấu nơi con số dựa trên một giả định.
Is George Clooney rich compared to the average person?
Yes. A net worth of $387.3 Million is far above the median American household, which sits near $193,000 according to Federal Reserve data.
What is George Clooney's biggest source of wealth?
On this page it is film salaries, the largest line in the calculation at $421.2 Million. The full breakdown, with every other line and its source, is above.
How much does George Clooney make from endorsements?
The model counts $32.0 Million in career endorsement income for George: 2 named partnerships x the $4.0M annual fee from the median disclosed film deal x a 4-year term, spread across the deal years. It is an estimate, since the individual deal values are not all public, and it sits as its own line in the calculation above.
What businesses does George Clooney own?
The stake counted on this page is Casamigos tequila sale proceeds. It is valued from a reported transaction or a revenue multiple, and shown as its own line in the calculation above with the basis next to it.
Khám phá các diễn viên khác
George Clooney
Angelina Jolie
Bruce Willis
Christian Bale
Emma Watson
Hugh Jackman
Jason Statham
Jennifer Aniston
Jennifer Garner
Jodie Foster
Johnny Depp
Julia Roberts
Leonardo DiCaprio
Margot Robbie
Matt Damon
Mila Kunis
Morgan Freeman
Natalie Portman
Samuel L. Jackson
Sandra Bullock
Scarlett Johansson
Sylvester Stallone
Tom Hanks
Giới thiệu về NetWorth Explained
We originally created NWE because nobody in the public-figure net worth space showed their work. Magazines and sites threw out big numbers while hiding behind vague claims of “proprietary algorithms” hoặc “insider knowledge.” That’s why we started the world’s only publication that transparently showed every assumption, every variable, and every calculation. We’re still the only ones who do it this way. Đọc thêm về NetWorth Explained.